>0/5

>0/5
Trash
>1/5
Bad
>2/5
Okay
>3/5
Good
>4/5
Great
>5/5
Masterpiece

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    for me it's a 3-star rating scale

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >conflating things that are good with things that are masterpieces
      horrible

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        don't care. My opinion is the only one that matters

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          If your opinion is so good, you should want it conveyed in a clear and understandable way. How are people supposed to know whether the thing you rated 3-stars is actually good or actually a masterpiece?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            by partitioning each star by 5. It's literally that easy. Only eternal cucks rely on other peoples' metrics/opinions

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >3 stars partitioned into 5 pieces
              that's just a 15 scale with extra autism

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    quantitative reviews should be totally ignored in favor of qualitative reviews

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Numeric ratings are completely arbitrary. I rate films by either recommending that people watch it or recommending that people don't.

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    the superior rating scale, I kneel

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    This is the system I use. For once OP isn't a homosexual troony homosexual and is actually right.

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >0/10
    Rotten
    >1/10
    Rotten
    >2/10
    Rotten
    >3/10
    Rotten
    >4/10
    Rotten
    >5/10
    Rotten
    >6/10
    Rotten
    >7/10
    Fresh
    >8/10
    Fresh
    >9/10
    Fresh
    >10/10
    Fresh
    unironically how rt works

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      What's worse is 1 to 10 scale rating systems where a 5 is average. Fricking frick it's so annoying. Everybody knows on a scale of 1 to 10 a 7 is average. NOT A FRICKING FIVE YOU moronic FRICKS

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        that literally makes no sense and that is why the 10-point scale is useless.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          7 is 70% of 10. A 70 is a 'C'. A 'C' is average. It makes perfect sense to anyone that's not moronic.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            In what sense is a C average.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >In what sense is a C average

              In every sense of western civilization.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >but school told me!
            get to bed anon, you don't want to be late tomorrow, maybe do a little bed time reading of the dictionary and look up the word "average"

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        If anything 6/10 is average in the sense that most movies you see will be 6s. But that doesn't change the fact that 5/10 is true middle of the road quality. Maybe 6 should be the new 5. Calling anything but 5 average seems moronic actually.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          A 6 is below average. If your girl is a 6,,/10 it means she's below average but not bog ugly. A 7 is average and any girl that's an 8 is considered hot.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >in the sense that most movies you see will be 6s
          the absolute state of this board

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          The quickest way to spot an autist is if they make a 5 average on a 1 to 10 scale. It's the most anti common sense thing a person can do.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        We found the games journalist

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      What's worse is 1 to 10 scale rating systems where a 5 is average. Fricking frick it's so annoying. Everybody knows on a scale of 1 to 10 a 7 is average. NOT A FRICKING FIVE YOU moronic FRICKS

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I also rate like that
    do you have ans letterboxeds accounte? I would like to follow your accounte OP

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Not OP but I rate movies like that and my letterboxd is katccat. I give most movies 3 stars and I don't have a ton of 1 and 2 stars because I avoid watching shitty movies.

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >"Okay" is lower than half the max score
    That's too counterintuitive.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      i'd replace "ok" with "meh"

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    having a 5 point scale just leads to a lot of fence sitting with 3s. Its better off with 6
    >Extremely Good
    >Very Good
    >Kinda Good
    >Kinda Bad
    >Very Bad
    >Extremely Bad

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      if you include 0 like OP did it is a 6 point scale

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    0-3 - unwatchable
    4 - watchable but that's it
    5 - mediocre
    6- slightly good
    7 - good
    8 - very good
    9 - great
    10 - kino

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >0, 1, 2 and 3 all mean the same thing
      then why differentiate?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        0 movie has noting good in it
        3 movie has something good but it's still unwatchable and you drop it 40 min in

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          if the final point is that it's unwatchable, then separating them like this is unnecessary, especially when you've also got 1 and 2 in between there somewhere.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >then separating them like this is unnecessary
            that's my personal rating system for my use only

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    do people really not use the 10 point rating system?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      anything being 5 is arbitrary

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >2/5
    >Okay
    that ain't right

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    numerical ratings in general are arbitrary autistic horse shit.
    did you like it? why or why not? numbers don't say shit and ratings gathered by aggregate polls are just popularity contests, no indication of quality.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      That is extremely reductive. OP's 5 star system can tell a lot about a movie if someone with no knowledge is looking for a "good" to "great" movie to watch

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >0/5
    complete garbage with not even a smidgen of ironic entertainment value
    >1/5
    Shit
    >2/5
    Pretty bad, maybe it had some neat ideas but the execution wasn't there at all
    >3/5
    Average, nothing great but nothing notably shit either
    >4/5
    Great, had some room for improvement but generally a knockout
    >5/5
    Nearly perfect, only complaints are "it ended" or very minor things

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >letterboxd ratings are a near perfect bell curve
    >just want to watch films I know I am probably gonna like now but will ruin the integrity of the curve
    I think my ratings days are over bros...

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *