It's a good movie and unquestionably an astounding box office hit: >projected to gross around $50 million from 3,550 theaters in its opening weekend.[2]The film made $10.3 million from Thursday night previews, the biggest-ever for a film with a simultaneous streaming release.
Have they? Honest critics just rate fast-food within fast-food parameters unlike movie critics who see the absence of esg/diversity hiring nonsense as a motive to be unfairly harsh. But FNAF shows less and less ppl trust critics
It sucks, it tries too hard to be LE SERIOUS TIMELIFE DRAMA BUT ALSO LE GAME LORE, Wily's Wonderland did it better because it knows the premise of ghost animatronics is fucking stupid and decided to have fun with it.
Every movie is bombing nowadays, unlike prepandemic where even the stupidest, shittiest movie cleared 700m WW. Making money is back to being a good metric.
Not really, Cinemaphile is first and foremost chinless contrarians escaped from /misc/. So if le evil DA JOOOOOOOOS at Rottentomatoes say the movie stinks, their contrarianism kicks in and they start saying it's the greatest movie ever.
There's actual responses to this post of anons saying >yes making money means a film is good
These same retards shit on The Avengers
Lol u can't make this shit up
It would have been better if they didn't show it during the trailers. Cory's fantastic, in fact he's one of my favorite youtubers. I think Matt is just so tied to FNAF in particular that it was especially surprising and funny to see him in the movie.
They could have easily made scary horror with the premise of FNAF. Souless robots are scary, just like the terminator. But they decided that making 3+ bullshit is better for the merchandise and attraction if toddlers. Sad
the first half was nice. it wasnt scary but I liked the campy horror feel and it was what I was expecting of it. the second half went to shit with the whole plot but it wasnt unbearable. its good if you played the games when you were younger and want to spend a night with friends but dont know what to do.
>FIVE NIGHTS AT FREDDY'S MEANS ALSO FIVE DAYS SOMEWHERE ELSE, AND THEY COULD NOT THINK OF ANYTHING GOOD FOR THAT >THE MOVIE COULD BE 1 HOUR SHORTER >its 1h45m
The only people here defending this are zoomers or people that are politically obsessed and will say it's good cause the creator is right leaning. I'm a rightoid myself but letting politics be rent free in your head to that extent is pathetic, it was nice the movie was all white people but aside from that, and the set design / lack of CGI it was garbage.
Watched it last night, I’d give it a 5/10.
The critics are right that it would honestly benefit from an R rating. The fact that all of the deaths are offscreen is tragic, and the MC’s acting is just… sleepy. It’s a pretty damn safe film, which is what most video game movies are, and the last 20 or so minutes was better.
Needed more William Afton.
Needed more gore.
Probably needed a shorter plot line for the MC, I really didn’t care for the dream sequences and the MC’s relationship with his sister.
Aunt subplot >goes nowhere only serves as a mcguffin to get him to work there >kills her off offscreen in the beginning of the 3rd act and it’s never touched on again despite dying in his house
Max and the bad guys breaking into Freddy’s >they all get brutally murdered >never touched upon again
Afton for some reason hiring people to guard Freddy’s
The dream subplot doesn’t do anything but soak runtime and introduce an anime fight between the kids and protag >playing around with the animatronics which just takes all the suspense out of the movie >leaving your little sister with murder robots for even a second just so you can flirt
>Afton for some reason hiring people to guard Freddy’s
Rewatch the movie and watch Aftons face when he reads Mikes last name. He instantly remembers that he killed his brother and wants to kill him too. As to why he would hire people other than Mike is to just kill people he doesn't like, he's a mentally ill serial killer.
Playing around with the animatronics show that the robots are just 5 year old kids stuck in purgatory, neither in hell or heaven just stuck somewhere. He already left his little sister alone with the robots when she was getting tickled by them.
Wait, the animatronics were practical effects?
Holy kino. I didnt realise and assumed they were CGI.
That makes the film 10x better than I had thought it was (and I enoyed it).
Yeah they did an amazing job with the animatronics. They had a suit version for some specific scenes, but otherwise was all animatronics. At the 6:45 minute mark here you can see them behind the scenes:
Vanessa 100% works with her dad, when she's about to get stabbed Afton says that she had only one job. I'm guessing she is the one that covers up the murders that happen with the security guards, they don't leave, they get killed.
I feel like we're going to see her in the Vanny suit and fully developed Springtrap only in the third movie. Second one is going to be a prequel with fnaf 2 and showing the bite of 87, or maybe the first pizzeria that was opened by Henry and Afton and how he became a serial killer.
the original game is super simple but builds tension so effectively that the jump scare will get you ever time
can't comment on any of the other games
It was a simple yet compelling concept I think it would’ve worked best as a horror short with a little less story; also I thought spring trap was the scariest character in the series personally so I’ve always like 3 the best
Why is everyone asking for more gore and violence when it was never that way in the games? If you were into the source material you knew good and well you weren't going to get anything explicit since it was always more about tell, don't show.
Certified garbage on par with M3gan or that shitty live action Death Note.
Can't believe you zoomers will stomach this kind of bland crap.
Don't care
RECORD BOX OFFICE PROFITS BABY!
Haven't seen this but M3gan was great and only contrarians on Cinemaphile didn't like it, so you're not helping your case.
joyless sack of lard detected
M3gan was based
Agreed
Both M3gan and FNAF are good movies in different.ways
It's a good movie and unquestionably an astounding box office hit:
>projected to gross around $50 million from 3,550 theaters in its opening weekend.[2]The film made $10.3 million from Thursday night previews, the biggest-ever for a film with a simultaneous streaming release.
That means making 250% of its budget (USD 20 mil) in three days btw
They've already said that the Peacock deal made it break even already, so this is just all pure profit.
Exactly. At least 2 sequels are already a certainty. And critics have shown once again how out of touch-- if not deliberately dishonest-- they are
Out of touch food critics have slated McDonalds food despite it making record profits
Have they? Honest critics just rate fast-food within fast-food parameters unlike movie critics who see the absence of esg/diversity hiring nonsense as a motive to be unfairly harsh. But FNAF shows less and less ppl trust critics
It sucks, it tries too hard to be LE SERIOUS TIMELIFE DRAMA BUT ALSO LE GAME LORE, Wily's Wonderland did it better because it knows the premise of ghost animatronics is fucking stupid and decided to have fun with it.
Video game movies can’t stop winning
it was okay pretty much what I expected from a 5 nights at Freddy's movie and definitely better than that low budget nic cage one
yeah gran turismo was pretty solid too
A film making money means it's "le good"?
/tv/... you've changed
Every movie is bombing nowadays, unlike prepandemic where even the stupidest, shittiest movie cleared 700m WW. Making money is back to being a good metric.
>Cinemaphile... you've changed
Not really, Cinemaphile is first and foremost chinless contrarians escaped from /misc/. So if le evil DA JOOOOOOOOS at Rottentomatoes say the movie stinks, their contrarianism kicks in and they start saying it's the greatest movie ever.
I simply enjoyed the movie for what it is, not a masterpiece but fun with excellent production values
There's actual responses to this post of anons saying
>yes making money means a film is good
These same retards shit on The Avengers
Lol u can't make this shit up
It's got good audience ratings too. People are liking the movie.
Yes, a movie is really good if the audience likes it but critics don't.
>FNAF 20%
>Megan 80%
Just ignore critics in general and judge by yourself.
I unironically soijaked in the theater when MatPat came on screen
>when MatPat came on screen
Oh yeah I forgot he showed on screen too
I soijacked a few times:
"I ALWAYS COME BACK"
Ella springlock costume
Sparky/Fetch costume
I love FNAF so much
Funny how that one black youtuber made multiple cameos and nobody even talks about him.
It would have been better if they didn't show it during the trailers. Cory's fantastic, in fact he's one of my favorite youtubers. I think Matt is just so tied to FNAF in particular that it was especially surprising and funny to see him in the movie.
They could have easily made scary horror with the premise of FNAF. Souless robots are scary, just like the terminator. But they decided that making 3+ bullshit is better for the merchandise and attraction if toddlers. Sad
>Is asleep for half the movie
It kinda makes sense, they wanted to bring the fnaf minigames to the movie and they did it through his dreams which was a good idea
the first half was nice. it wasnt scary but I liked the campy horror feel and it was what I was expecting of it. the second half went to shit with the whole plot but it wasnt unbearable. its good if you played the games when you were younger and want to spend a night with friends but dont know what to do.
Them going 100% practical for the animatronics was perfect, I imagine they each cost a small fortune though
It was worth it since they made their money back anyway and then some
animatronics are cheaper than cgi
Maybe in 1990
i watch it for she
heard statement
>FIVE NIGHTS AT FREDDY'S MEANS ALSO FIVE DAYS SOMEWHERE ELSE, AND THEY COULD NOT THINK OF ANYTHING GOOD FOR THAT
>THE MOVIE COULD BE 1 HOUR SHORTER
>its 1h45m
It was extremely mediocre.
The only people here defending this are zoomers or people that are politically obsessed and will say it's good cause the creator is right leaning. I'm a rightoid myself but letting politics be rent free in your head to that extent is pathetic, it was nice the movie was all white people but aside from that, and the set design / lack of CGI it was garbage.
Watched it last night, I’d give it a 5/10.
The critics are right that it would honestly benefit from an R rating. The fact that all of the deaths are offscreen is tragic, and the MC’s acting is just… sleepy. It’s a pretty damn safe film, which is what most video game movies are, and the last 20 or so minutes was better.
Needed more William Afton.
Needed more gore.
Probably needed a shorter plot line for the MC, I really didn’t care for the dream sequences and the MC’s relationship with his sister.
Aunt subplot
>goes nowhere only serves as a mcguffin to get him to work there
>kills her off offscreen in the beginning of the 3rd act and it’s never touched on again despite dying in his house
Max and the bad guys breaking into Freddy’s
>they all get brutally murdered
>never touched upon again
Afton for some reason hiring people to guard Freddy’s
The dream subplot doesn’t do anything but soak runtime and introduce an anime fight between the kids and protag
>playing around with the animatronics which just takes all the suspense out of the movie
>leaving your little sister with murder robots for even a second just so you can flirt
>Afton for some reason hiring people to guard Freddy’s
Rewatch the movie and watch Aftons face when he reads Mikes last name. He instantly remembers that he killed his brother and wants to kill him too. As to why he would hire people other than Mike is to just kill people he doesn't like, he's a mentally ill serial killer.
Playing around with the animatronics show that the robots are just 5 year old kids stuck in purgatory, neither in hell or heaven just stuck somewhere. He already left his little sister alone with the robots when she was getting tickled by them.
Wait, the animatronics were practical effects?
Holy kino. I didnt realise and assumed they were CGI.
That makes the film 10x better than I had thought it was (and I enoyed it).
Yes, this movie actually has animatronics + suits.
Yeah they did an amazing job with the animatronics. They had a suit version for some specific scenes, but otherwise was all animatronics. At the 6:45 minute mark here you can see them behind the scenes:
Yup im thinking kino
Vanessa 100% works with her dad, when she's about to get stabbed Afton says that she had only one job. I'm guessing she is the one that covers up the murders that happen with the security guards, they don't leave, they get killed.
Yeah no shit. Wouldn’t surprise me if she is stuck in one of the suits in movie two while in a coma
I feel like we're going to see her in the Vanny suit and fully developed Springtrap only in the third movie. Second one is going to be a prequel with fnaf 2 and showing the bite of 87, or maybe the first pizzeria that was opened by Henry and Afton and how he became a serial killer.
You can see the Vanny suit in the opening with the drawings too.
just looked up the game for this and it’s bad. just looking left and right and then at your security cameras for 10 minutes a night. pretty boring
the original game is super simple but builds tension so effectively that the jump scare will get you ever time
can't comment on any of the other games
It was a simple yet compelling concept I think it would’ve worked best as a horror short with a little less story; also I thought spring trap was the scariest character in the series personally so I’ve always like 3 the best
here you go
Why is everyone asking for more gore and violence when it was never that way in the games? If you were into the source material you knew good and well you weren't going to get anything explicit since it was always more about tell, don't show.
because they watched the VHS fan-made tapes and thought that's FNAF