13 years for CGI like this

  1. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Very funny Cameron. I bet you put that there just for me to look at and say boy that sure looks like a dick

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      It looks more like an antennae thing that got chopped.

  2. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    it looks great in motion in IMAX 3D
    but you are retard that will not get it anyway

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >that will not get it anyway
      Whats there to "get"? We're talking about cgi. Its completely visual, theres no meaning or subtext you are just looking at pretty computer generated colours.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Just go in December to proper cinema like IMAX 3D or Dolby and see yourself anon.

        Arguing on jpgs or 2D webms will not change the fact that 2-minute underwater 3D scene from Avatar 2 blow away any visuals in any blockbuster in last 15 years and I can say it because I saw these underwater scenes at end credits of re-release of first Avatar in IMAX 3D

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          no thanks I dont enjoy shallow cgi films

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          >just shell out your money, trust me!!!

          No. Shills tried this with the first Avatar saying that the IMAX experience was way better than what we were seeing in jpgs and I fell for it. It wasn't nearly that impressive in person and Avatar 2 will be the same shit.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          I'm not watching a 3 hour cartoon in IMAX.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Of course the character wearing the skimpiest clothing is the child...

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        well yeah, that's how it is in all native communities, because no one cares about kid parts but obsessed Americans

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      How does this look good? Everything outside of the iris is out of focus.

  3. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Video-game graphics have come a long way.

  4. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Extremely high-def cartoons aren't interesting anymore, and the first movie was just an extremely high-def cartoon stapled to a shitty rip-off of a story that had been done to death as of 10 years prior. It was so tone-deaf and sci-fi illiterate that the magical substances was referred to in the script as 'unobtanium.'
    Nobody is going to give a shit about the new movie's high-def cartoonery. The only question is whether or not the script is Ferngully II: Dances With Cats, where our heroes have to recover The MacGuffin without getting shot by the pistol that the villain, Chekov, put in a drawer in the first act.
    The smart money is saying it's trash. It gives every indication of a production that didn't feel like it needed to learn any lessons from the first one because they made a bunch of money.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >It was so tone-deaf and sci-fi illiterate that the magical substances was referred to in the script as 'unobtanium.'
      Yeah because real undiscovered or rare elements sound so much "realistic"
      >Europium
      >Americium
      >Moscovium
      >Einsteinium
      >Tenessine
      >Californium
      >Dubnium
      dumbass

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Google the word 'unobtainium,' fat kid.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          So I'm right and based.
          Got it
          thanks, cucklet

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous
          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Can you try communicate for once without preprogrammed responses you've absorbed by osmosis? It makes you look like a spastic moron.

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              cope more, monkey

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >Cope
                You failed, not surprisingly.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                I win

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                You win at showing everyone you encounter just how much your mother drank when you were in the womb

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous
              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                That is still a preprogrammed response you realize this right?
                No of course you don't you lack any semblance of self awareness.
                You're still wrong about unobtanium as well, embarrassing.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                I already won bro. Keep on coping

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                Well I have seen the scene, you haven't
                you're judging based off a still picture
                keep telling yourself it looks like a video game, but don't surprised in a few weeks when people start having their mind blown

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >keep telling yourself it looks like a video game
                Did you really have this entire conversation thinking that was my position

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Unobtanium is a real term used in engineering to refer to a hypothetical.
      Your several-standard-deviations-lower-than-the-norm is showing

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        > Unobtanium is a real term used in engineering to refer to a hypothetical.
        You are very very close to understanding why the characters actually calling it “unobtanium” is extremely stupid.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      You have this saved as a text file to post every time don't you? Not because it's a witty pasta but because you're so incredibly proud of it
      L O L
      O
      L

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Don't post again

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >the absolute copelet replies

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >The smart money is saying it's trash.
      Everytime the 'smart money' bets against Cameron, they lose.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >Ferngully II: Dances With Cats, where our heroes have to recover The MacGuffin without getting shot by the pistol that the villain, Chekov, put in a drawer in the first act.

      heh

  5. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >13 years
    lol no. they started filming like only couple years ago

  6. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Handled by only the best in Mumbai

  7. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    I TOLD YOU HOMOS THAT BY THE TIME THIS PIECE OF SHIT RELEASED THAT THE CGI WOULD BE DATED. But over the years you guys just replied "stfu retard, no it won't"
    yet here we are 🙂 fuck avatar btw

  8. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    The cultural legacy of Avatar is it being a good movie to watch at Best Buy to see if a tv is good or not

  9. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    It looks great to me.

  10. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    ppl had realized 13years ago that still images don't do the effects justice.

  11. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah I have seen this scene on a big screen
    it's literally the best CGI you have ever seen, but keep complaining and nitpicking
    you won't have to take my word for it when people start seeing it

  12. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >Titanic was released 25 years ago
    >the director, one of the greatest living filmmakers, has dedicated his entire quarter century on earth since then focusing all of his time and effort on a generic cgi Fern Gully adaptation
    >will also waste his talents on this franchise for the next 10 years at least
    I used to think Philip Seymour Hoffman's premature death was the biggest waste of potential in cinema, but I think Jimmy has surpassed him in sheer magnitude of squandered talent

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      The titanic sucked too, you gay gay

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >One of the greatest living filmmakers
      Lmao, he hasn't had a good film since T2

  13. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    The bad thing about 13 years in production is that you're also releasing footage using 13 year old tech.

  14. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    can't wait for this to flop in relation to the first
    first one was a glorified tech demo that was just pocahontas in space

    CGI isn't impressive these days and there is no 3D gimmick
    people want real fucking props, sets and stunts in their movies, as evidenced by top gun

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >CGI isn't impressive these days
      Because it all shit these days
      The only CGI that has stood the test of time is Davy Jones in the pirates movies and that's because he was wet. Guess what the way of water has? Water and as we all know water is wet.

  15. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    I wanna fuck Kate Winslet so bad bros

  16. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Have we all stipped pretending to be impressed by the original Avatars janky PS3 cutscene looking graphics yet?
    This looks like a marginal improvement, still never going to see it

  17. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    I refuse to believe this is a real image from the movie.
    One of the goofiest things I have ever seen.

  18. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >CGI is 13 yrs old old
    hehe cute dicky cgi

  19. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    This movie is the closest I can get to that colonial scifi space marine shit
    the closest I can get to a sequel to space marines from aliens or titanfall 2 colonial space life

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *