>that will not get it anyway
Whats there to "get"? We're talking about cgi. Its completely visual, theres no meaning or subtext you are just looking at pretty computer generated colours.
Just go in December to proper cinema like IMAX 3D or Dolby and see yourself anon.
Arguing on jpgs or 2D webms will not change the fact that 2-minute underwater 3D scene from Avatar 2 blow away any visuals in any blockbuster in last 15 years and I can say it because I saw these underwater scenes at end credits of re-release of first Avatar in IMAX 3D
No. Shills tried this with the first Avatar saying that the IMAX experience was way better than what we were seeing in jpgs and I fell for it. It wasn't nearly that impressive in person and Avatar 2 will be the same shit.
Extremely high-def cartoons aren't interesting anymore, and the first movie was just an extremely high-def cartoon stapled to a shitty rip-off of a story that had been done to death as of 10 years prior. It was so tone-deaf and sci-fi illiterate that the magical substances was referred to in the script as 'unobtanium.'
Nobody is going to give a shit about the new movie's high-def cartoonery. The only question is whether or not the script is Ferngully II: Dances With Cats, where our heroes have to recover The MacGuffin without getting shot by the pistol that the villain, Chekov, put in a drawer in the first act.
The smart money is saying it's trash. It gives every indication of a production that didn't feel like it needed to learn any lessons from the first one because they made a bunch of money.
>It was so tone-deaf and sci-fi illiterate that the magical substances was referred to in the script as 'unobtanium.'
Yeah because real undiscovered or rare elements sound so much "realistic" >Europium >Americium >Moscovium >Einsteinium >Tenessine >Californium >Dubnium
dumbass
You win at showing everyone you encounter just how much your mother drank when you were in the womb
1 year ago
Anonymous
1 year ago
Anonymous
That is still a preprogrammed response you realize this right?
No of course you don't you lack any semblance of self awareness.
You're still wrong about unobtanium as well, embarrassing.
1 year ago
Anonymous
I already won bro. Keep on coping
1 year ago
Anonymous
Well I have seen the scene, you haven't
you're judging based off a still picture
keep telling yourself it looks like a video game, but don't surprised in a few weeks when people start having their mind blown
1 year ago
Anonymous
>keep telling yourself it looks like a video game
Did you really have this entire conversation thinking that was my position
> Unobtanium is a real term used in engineering to refer to a hypothetical.
You are very very close to understanding why the characters actually calling it “unobtanium” is extremely stupid.
>Ferngully II: Dances With Cats, where our heroes have to recover The MacGuffin without getting shot by the pistol that the villain, Chekov, put in a drawer in the first act.
I TOLD YOU HOMOS THAT BY THE TIME THIS PIECE OF SHIT RELEASED THAT THE CGI WOULD BE DATED. But over the years you guys just replied "stfu moron, no it won't"
yet here we are 🙂 frick avatar btw
Yeah I have seen this scene on a big screen
it's literally the best CGI you have ever seen, but keep complaining and nitpicking
you won't have to take my word for it when people start seeing it
>Titanic was released 25 years ago >the director, one of the greatest living filmmakers, has dedicated his entire quarter century on earth since then focusing all of his time and effort on a generic cgi Fern Gully adaptation >will also waste his talents on this franchise for the next 10 years at least
I used to think Philip Seymour Hoffman's premature death was the biggest waste of potential in cinema, but I think Jimmy has surpassed him in sheer magnitude of squandered talent
>CGI isn't impressive these days
Because it all shit these days
The only CGI that has stood the test of time is Davy Jones in the pirates movies and that's because he was wet. Guess what the way of water has? Water and as we all know water is wet.
Have we all stipped pretending to be impressed by the original Avatars janky PS3 cutscene looking graphics yet?
This looks like a marginal improvement, still never going to see it
This movie is the closest I can get to that colonial scifi space marine shit
the closest I can get to a sequel to space marines from aliens or titanfall 2 colonial space life
Very funny Cameron. I bet you put that there just for me to look at and say boy that sure looks like a dick
It looks more like an antennae thing that got chopped.
it looks great in motion in IMAX 3D
but you are moron that will not get it anyway
>that will not get it anyway
Whats there to "get"? We're talking about cgi. Its completely visual, theres no meaning or subtext you are just looking at pretty computer generated colours.
Just go in December to proper cinema like IMAX 3D or Dolby and see yourself anon.
Arguing on jpgs or 2D webms will not change the fact that 2-minute underwater 3D scene from Avatar 2 blow away any visuals in any blockbuster in last 15 years and I can say it because I saw these underwater scenes at end credits of re-release of first Avatar in IMAX 3D
no thanks I dont enjoy shallow cgi films
>just shell out your money, trust me!!!
No. Shills tried this with the first Avatar saying that the IMAX experience was way better than what we were seeing in jpgs and I fell for it. It wasn't nearly that impressive in person and Avatar 2 will be the same shit.
I'm not watching a 3 hour cartoon in IMAX.
Of course the character wearing the skimpiest clothing is the child...
well yeah, that's how it is in all native communities, because no one cares about kid parts but obsessed Americans
How does this look good? Everything outside of the iris is out of focus.
Video-game graphics have come a long way.
Extremely high-def cartoons aren't interesting anymore, and the first movie was just an extremely high-def cartoon stapled to a shitty rip-off of a story that had been done to death as of 10 years prior. It was so tone-deaf and sci-fi illiterate that the magical substances was referred to in the script as 'unobtanium.'
Nobody is going to give a shit about the new movie's high-def cartoonery. The only question is whether or not the script is Ferngully II: Dances With Cats, where our heroes have to recover The MacGuffin without getting shot by the pistol that the villain, Chekov, put in a drawer in the first act.
The smart money is saying it's trash. It gives every indication of a production that didn't feel like it needed to learn any lessons from the first one because they made a bunch of money.
>It was so tone-deaf and sci-fi illiterate that the magical substances was referred to in the script as 'unobtanium.'
Yeah because real undiscovered or rare elements sound so much "realistic"
>Europium
>Americium
>Moscovium
>Einsteinium
>Tenessine
>Californium
>Dubnium
dumbass
Google the word 'unobtainium,' fat kid.
So I'm right and based.
Got it
thanks, cucklet
Can you try communicate for once without preprogrammed responses you've absorbed by osmosis? It makes you look like a spastic moron.
cope more, monkey
>Cope
You failed, not surprisingly.
I win
You win at showing everyone you encounter just how much your mother drank when you were in the womb
That is still a preprogrammed response you realize this right?
No of course you don't you lack any semblance of self awareness.
You're still wrong about unobtanium as well, embarrassing.
I already won bro. Keep on coping
Well I have seen the scene, you haven't
you're judging based off a still picture
keep telling yourself it looks like a video game, but don't surprised in a few weeks when people start having their mind blown
>keep telling yourself it looks like a video game
Did you really have this entire conversation thinking that was my position
Unobtanium is a real term used in engineering to refer to a hypothetical.
Your several-standard-deviations-lower-than-the-norm is showing
> Unobtanium is a real term used in engineering to refer to a hypothetical.
You are very very close to understanding why the characters actually calling it “unobtanium” is extremely stupid.
You have this saved as a text file to post every time don't you? Not because it's a witty pasta but because you're so incredibly proud of it
L O L
O
L
Don't post again
>the absolute copelet replies
>The smart money is saying it's trash.
Everytime the 'smart money' bets against Cameron, they lose.
>Ferngully II: Dances With Cats, where our heroes have to recover The MacGuffin without getting shot by the pistol that the villain, Chekov, put in a drawer in the first act.
heh
>13 years
lol no. they started filming like only couple years ago
Handled by only the best in Mumbai
I TOLD YOU HOMOS THAT BY THE TIME THIS PIECE OF SHIT RELEASED THAT THE CGI WOULD BE DATED. But over the years you guys just replied "stfu moron, no it won't"
yet here we are 🙂 frick avatar btw
The cultural legacy of Avatar is it being a good movie to watch at Best Buy to see if a tv is good or not
It looks great to me.
ppl had realized 13years ago that still images don't do the effects justice.
Yeah I have seen this scene on a big screen
it's literally the best CGI you have ever seen, but keep complaining and nitpicking
you won't have to take my word for it when people start seeing it
>Titanic was released 25 years ago
>the director, one of the greatest living filmmakers, has dedicated his entire quarter century on earth since then focusing all of his time and effort on a generic cgi Fern Gully adaptation
>will also waste his talents on this franchise for the next 10 years at least
I used to think Philip Seymour Hoffman's premature death was the biggest waste of potential in cinema, but I think Jimmy has surpassed him in sheer magnitude of squandered talent
The titanic sucked too, you gay homosexual
>One of the greatest living filmmakers
Lmao, he hasn't had a good film since T2
The bad thing about 13 years in production is that you're also releasing footage using 13 year old tech.
can't wait for this to flop in relation to the first
first one was a glorified tech demo that was just pocahontas in space
CGI isn't impressive these days and there is no 3D gimmick
people want real fricking props, sets and stunts in their movies, as evidenced by top gun
>CGI isn't impressive these days
Because it all shit these days
The only CGI that has stood the test of time is Davy Jones in the pirates movies and that's because he was wet. Guess what the way of water has? Water and as we all know water is wet.
I wanna frick Kate Winslet so bad bros
Have we all stipped pretending to be impressed by the original Avatars janky PS3 cutscene looking graphics yet?
This looks like a marginal improvement, still never going to see it
I refuse to believe this is a real image from the movie.
One of the goofiest things I have ever seen.
>CGI is 13 yrs old old
hehe cute dicky cgi
This movie is the closest I can get to that colonial scifi space marine shit
the closest I can get to a sequel to space marines from aliens or titanfall 2 colonial space life