>60s
Marvel
>70s
Marvel
>80s
DC
>90s
DC
>00s
Tie
>10s
Marvel
 Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
>60s
>60s
Marvel
>70s
Marvel
>80s
DC
>90s
DC
>00s
Tie
>10s
Marvel
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
|
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
I like both and console warring has always been gay.
I hate Cinemaphilensole wars too. I just thought those were the times each company had better output.
fair enough
>10s
Neither
>50s
DC
>40s
DC
DC dominated the 00s too, though. There was nothing good going on at Marvel besides Annihilation.
DC was killing it until that hack fraud Morrison brought Barry Allen back to life in Final Crisis.
>There was nothing good going on at Marvel besides Annihilation.
Chaos War, House of M, Civil War, Secret Invasion?
>DC was killing it until that hack fraud Morrison brought Barry Allen back to life in Final Crisis.
DC was terrible in the 00. Infinite Crisis and Identity Crisis were dogshit.
>Chaos War, House of M, Civil War, Secret Invasion?
hero versus hero, was the multiverse fatigue of 2000s, same goes for identity crisis
Annihilation and civil war are fricking terrible.
>There was nothing good going on at Marvel besides Annihilation.
Straczynski's Spider-Man.
Bendis' Daredeivl.
Brubaker's Captain America (I think it sucks but a lot of people like it)
Fraction's Iron Man
Straczynski's Thor
Morrison's and Whedon's X-Men
Pak's Hulk
I know FF also had some acclaimed runs
Basically every mainstream Marvel superhero in the 2000s had a notable acclaimed run.
Oh, and Ennis' Punisher, naturally.
Wade/Ringo and Hickman are both 2000s and both are all-time runs on FF.
>Bendis' Daredevil.
Do leftist comics really...?
It was at least a novelty at the time. Then it turned out that that's all Bendis knew how to do.
You could post anything from Bendis and you picked this. There's nothing wrong with this
too much text.
That concept is a meme for brainlets. Just because comics are visual doesn't mean that's the ONLY thing they are.
it's cumbersome storytelling. the images are irrelevant in all those panels. images and text should co-exist.
and it's not a "meme for brainlets". it's the very foundation of sequential art. if you simply write shit and the visuals are irrelevant then you might as well write a novel or something.
You're missing the point of the meme.
It's a visual medium, things shouldn't have to be described by words.
Is Bendis' DD worth reading? I like DD, but it just seems too... Bendis.
No. It's shit.
DC has more masterpieces overall.
It doesn't, and it certainly doesn't have works on the same level.
Unless you're counting Vertigo/BL titles (which are separate from DC's main continuity).
>It doesn't, and it certainly doesn't have works on the same level.
Yea, they do. They easily outnumber Marvel in actual masterpieces. Watchmen, Swamp Thing, The Sandman, Preacher, Hellblazer, TDKR, Year One, Planetary, Arkham Asylum, New Gods, etc. Majority of the most acclaimed comics of all time are from DC.
>inb4 the "b-but they are le Vertigo, not DC!" cope
it's part of the same company, now called DC Black Label.
>it's part of the same company, now called DC Black Label.
>Unless you're counting Vertigo/BL titles
Are you moronic?
>Watchmen, a comic published by DC Comics is not the same level as the dogshit published by Marvel every decade
kek
O'Neill's Question
Grell's Green Arrow
Ostrander's Suicide Squad
Giffen/DeMatteis JLI
Dematteis Dr Fate
Ostrander The spectre
Ostrander The Kents
Robinson's The Golden Age
Baron and Jones Deadman
Skreemer
Thriller
Wasteland
Arkham Asylum
Year One
DKRA
Long Halloween
Haunted Knight
Ego
Selina's Big Score
New Frontier
All Star Superman
For All Seasons
Secret Identity
Red Son
For the Man who has everything
Whatever Happened to the Man of Tomorrow
Gotham by Gaslight
Thrillkiller
Chaykin's Blackhawk
Twilight
Cosmic Odyssey
Jeff Smith's Shazam
Kyle Baker's Plastic Man
Moore's Saga of the Swamp Thing, Gaiman's Sandman and Morrison's exist in DC
Should I keep going?
Half of those titles are shit and underpreformed. Try again.
cope.
Cope more
Name more better Marvel th3n
>Cosmic Odyssey
>anti-life is a monster
>good
>Planetary
That was with Wildstorm. If that counts, then so does ABC. Other than that, I agree that DC has more masterpieces.
>Watchmen, Swamp Thing, The Sandman, Preacher, Hellblazer, TDKR, Year One, Planetary, Arkham Asylum, New Gods, etc. Majority of the most acclaimed comics of all time are from DC.
2/3rd of the titles you listed are out-of-continuity Vertigo/BL titles (most of which aren't even capeshit) and the rest range between bad to okay.
No one who has read the New Gods will ever recommend it because it's a shit story. Frick, it even got cancelled because of how bad the sales were. It's a wordy slog where nothing happens and the only reason people like to bring it up is because it's Darkseid's first appearance.
So you're sitting here recommending works you haven't even read.
>2/3rd of the titles you listed are out-of-continuity Vertigo/BL titles (most of which aren't even capeshit) and the rest range between bad to okay.
"Aren't even capeshit?" I named comics published by DC which are critical darlings. Your personal opinion little matters. DC outnumbers Marvel in quantity of masterpieces.
>I named comics published by DC which are critical darlings.
No shit, they're getting reprints every year.
>Your personal opinion little matters.
Says the dude presenting his own opinion.
With the exception of Hellblazer I've read all of the books you listed.
>No shit, they're getting reprints every year.
Just like classic novels get reprinted. Just like classic movies get 4K restorations.
>Says the dude presenting his own opinion.
Opinions of many publications, actually. In any top of all time, most of the good stuff is DC.
>With the exception of Hellblazer I've read all of the books you listed.
Good for you.
What Marvel comics are better than these, according to you?
The point I was that Marvel makes better capeshit.
The Phoenix Saga (first resurrected character), Infinity Gauntlet and Infinity War (the only good space operas), the coming of Galactus (the first introduction to the cosmic), Secret Wars, the Death of Captain Marvel, Miller's Daredevil, Ennis' Punisher, House of M, the Days of Future Past, etc.
There are also recent titles like the Immortal Hulk and House of X that are very good.
>The point I was that Marvel makes better capeshit.
That was never even the topic. You created your own argument and you answered it yourself. See:
>The Phoenix Saga (first resurrected character)
>The Phoenix Saga (first resurrected character),
missed it by 20 years, anon
https://www.cbr.com/when-we-first-met-who-was-the-first-superhero-to-come-back-from-the-dead/
Not the guy you're replying to, but Preacher and part of Sandman are Vertigo, and all the good parts of Hellblazer are pre-Vertigo. Watchmen and Moore Swamp Thing are pre-Vertigo. Aside from New Gods (haven't read it myself), not one of those is less than good.
Technically Vertigo started with Sandman. But you were talking about mature content labeled content that was later put under the Vertigo imprint.
New Gods suck, and that's no secret. Even the few people who recommend it will tell you to keep your expectations low and be patient with it.
The rest of the works (except for maybe Hellblazer) are good.
But most of these works are disconnected from the DC continuity. Yes there are cameos in Sandman and DC has tried to force Watchmen into the DCU (to capitalize on its success) but they were always their own separate stories.
Even the New Gods was originally written to be separate.
You're mistaking DC Universe with DC Comics. There's no reason why these comics you mention shouldn't be included.
I would like to know which Marvel comic is better than Watchmen.
>No one who has read the New Gods will ever recommend it because it's a shit story. Frick, it even got cancelled because of how bad the sales were. It's a wordy slog where nothing happens and the only reason people like to bring it up is because it's Darkseid's first appearance.
What a load of horseshit. New Gods is better than most Silver Age Marvel.
>What a load of horseshit. New Gods is better than most Silver Age Marvel.
I mean, I kinda agree. SA Marvel had a lot of lackluster, uninspired titles.
>Iron Man
>Human Torch
>(Gi)Ant-Man
>Daredevil
>X-Men
Most of these took years or even decades to find their true identity.
But how many of them were cancelled because of a lack of sales?
If sales is all you're concerned about, then by that logic all Silver Age Batman books are superior in quality to Silver Age marvel because Silver Age Batman outsold them
SA X-Men is underrated.
Reaction images aren't valid arguments, old man
So much talking....
Kind of like the "only good space opera" aka the infinity gaylet lmao
That's not Kirby's Fourth World.
Kirby's Thor and F4
Ditko's Spidey and Strange
Steranko's Nick Fury
Only redeemable Silver Age Marvel
I love Steranko, but Kirby’s SHIELD is pretty fricking good, too.
>out-of-continuity
why the frick does that make a difference?
does ultimate spider-man not count for marvel?
He's an idiot who thinks only continuity and sales matter
>sales indicate quality
>doesn't have works on the same level.
Correct, they're better.
I might actually like 70s DC better tbh.
>Jonah Hex
>LOSH
>Unknown Soldier
>Swamp Thing
>Green Lantern/Green Arrow
>Various horror anthologies
Marvel didn't really have that much except all their 60s books being worse than before.
However I would pick Marvel in the 80s instead of DC.
>However I would pick Marvel in the 80s instead of DC
Why? That's the most obvious one where DC is better.
Marvel peaked in the 70s
DC peaked in the 80s
>>60s
>Marvel
>>70s
>Marvel
>>80s
>DC
>>90s
>Manga
>>00s
>Manga
>>10s
>Manga
>>20s
>Manga
>>30s
>Manga
>>40s
>Manga
FTFY
Manga has always been superior to comics as far as we know.
Not only is what you're trying to convey based on a fully moronic metric, but you can also see that's it's only from 2004.
google can only track so much within the timeframe of its existence my friend
All this tells me is that Marvel > DC since 2012, and before that they were kind of even.
Nah, manga is shit that only gay morons like.
10s is a tie too since they were both at record low quality
everything Gardner Fox did in the 60s was golden but yeah Marvel in the 60s and 70s
I'd give the 10s as a tie for mediocrity.
Gardner Fox comics are boring as frick.
you are mistaken as my dubs are larger than yours
Doesn't matter. I'm right, you're wrong.
I accept your concession.
I like both equal, but realistic:
>60s
>Marvel
>70s
>Marvel
>>80s
>DC
>90s
>DC
>00s
>DC
>10s
>DC