>AAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHH THE CYBORGS ARE MAKING ME GO INSAAAAAAAAANE!!!!

>AAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHH THE CYBORGS ARE MAKING ME GO INSAAAAAAAAANE!!!!

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Cinemaphileirgins everytime they see a pride flags next month

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      How the frick do you even know which month is pride month?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        already saw seething threads about it

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Why would you approve of it?

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            approve of what?

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Promoting/homosexualry and troony shit in general.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                freedom of speech, not illegal, I don't care

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >indoctrinate and molest kids all you want queers, I don't care.
                have a nice day troony enabler.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                false premise, dishonest as usual

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You think a state and corporate sponsored month of gay and troony shilling is "free speech". You're either a fricking moron or a disingenuous troony enabler.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                corporations want to sell more product to a market of growing minorities, it's not a conspiracy, it's called capitalism

                most kids are and have always been molested by their own non-rainbow flag waving family members, to pretend this isn't the case is simply dishonest

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Disingenuous troony enabler it is.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Corporations don't want to sell anything anymore, they want access to revenue streams from investment funds and government grants, society is completely fraudulent.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                This is more nuanced troony shilling than the normal posters. It’s more likely an Israeli than an American discord troon.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It absolutely is free speech you absolute moron. If only speech that didn’t piss you off was protected, it wouldn’t be free speech at all

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        is it the month with a lot of gay flags or is it the month with a ton of gay flags?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          is the month where all corporations ONLY give you the option to buy their product in troony flag colors exclusively as opposed to suggesting you buy it exclusively.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >gays take the rainbow and the best summer month
        Won't be a tear in sight when the militas make them bite the curb.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >he doesn't have an unremovable reminder thing on his calendar app
        does the iphone calendar not have this? or are you some bum that doesn't have a need for a calendar? its enough to make me switch tbh

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Thankfully I'm not an igay.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You can turn off holidays and shit like that on your calendar and possibly just make your own custom one synced from your email.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      But that does trick people into going insane? Why else would so many people be cutting their dicks off?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >pedocrats when they see the age of consent

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    There were about 10 layers of approval given to these photos before they were released. Crazy stuff.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The actors & director were extremely pissed off about the marketing of this film, noting that the studio managed it all. For those who don't know, but the twist was spoiled in both the trailer and the movie poster.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        That twist was moronic and a betrayal.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >betrayal
          Not as bad as Terminator: Dark Fate

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The Genisys twist actually comes from the original John Brancato and Michael Ferris Terminator 3 draft, before the studio held a gun to his head and made him rewrite it as a Terminator 2 retread. (Brancato despises Terminator 2, feeling it ruined the original Terminator, and took this pretty badly, hence the "frick you, and especially frick Terminator 2" ending in Terminator 3.)
          >The producers had offices in a grafittied single-story building in Santa Monica. The pair in charge had foreign accents, Ferraris and elaborate facial hair. Their underlings were more familiar development types, although one had almost sued me over rights to that last spec script of ours. This braintrust had decided on a series of givens: Arnold had to play a good terminator (again), the bad terminator had to be a female (robots have genders?), John Connor had to be a successful executive (and not Eddy Furlong). These were potentially fatal handicaps, but we still managed to come up with some ideas. Trusting Mostow's recommendation more than seemed wise, they said sure, here's a deal, go write a first draft.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Arnold shows up and tries to kill rich, smug John Connor. A female terminator, a nanotech assemblage of micro-bots, strives to protect him. Yet it turns out Arnold was sent by the Resistance-- and the nano-chick is Skynet's most nefarious creation of all. See, after the first two pairs of terminators were sent back from 2029 for the first two movies, JC revealed himself to be evil-- a Skynet deep-cover agent. He destroyed/will destroy the human resistance from within. This is all because the female nano-terminator supposedly defending him actually infects him in the present day, with a nanobot that bores deep into his brain. So after Connor betrays humanity in 2032, his mortified wife Kate sends Arnold back to kill John Connor in 2003. (Sarah Connor is already dead of cancer, by the way.) In the film's action, the Arnold terminator fails, nano-b***h kills true love Kate-- but Judgment Day seems to have been prevented yet again (although Connor still has a scrap of Skynet inside his head, the-end-or-is-it?). This script was, admittedly, pretty insane, trippy and multiversive. We were out to conjure some of the dizzy absurdity of the first Terminator. I was happy with the script.
            >It nearly got us fired. Thanks to Mostow's desperate lobbying on our behalf, we were given a few weeks for one last chance. To hell with integrity. Mike and I worked frantically to cobble together what was wanted, namely a far more predictable script. A typically good Arnold saves a down-and-out JC from a Swiss-Army knife terminatrix, etc. It felt safe, expected, paint-by-numbers. We quickly realized the only possible saving grace, the one thing that could begin to justify the film's existence, would be to end the world in the last scenes-- and so return the franchise to the fatalistic integrity of the original "Terminator." I never imagined this would fly.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >The "development process" involved the usual dumbing and watering down, cutting for budget, gutting character moments, turning anything shaded into black and white. We were told to throw back in elements from the script we were first handed, such as "She'll be back" and stupid sunglasses. We refused to write in a Chili's endorsement, though we suggested "I'll be baby-back, baby-back, baby-back ribs." Another writer came in at the last minute and threw in a few more clunky lines and cringe-worthy moments. The shoot had some near-disasters, including a major part recast after a week of filming, and a budget shortfall that required a cash loan from Schwarzenegger. Mostow actually shot plates for a time bubble arriving in the fallout shelter with yet another Arnold to avert Judgment Day at the last second, just in case focus groups demanded it.
              >When I saw the finished product, I was pretty bummed. The casting choices were dubious, the look too brightly-lit and TV-ish, the campy comedic bits painful to watch. Subtleties that somehow survived development were sacrificed to overly-aggressive editing. Incredibly, the movie did keep our ending. Critics were kinder to "T3" than I'd expected, and while the domestic box office was middling, it did well overseas.
              He also wrote Terminator Salvation because his writing partner needed money and fricking hates "McNugget" the director. Brancato's original screenplay was a soulless cashgrab he didn't want to write, but it was way better than the final product.
              https://imsdb.com/scripts/Terminator-Salvation.html

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Contrary to what McG claimed in interviews, the original ending of Salvation is this pic related. All that stuff about Marcus/John getting up off the operating table as a shocking, mean spirited ending was HIS bullshit. The original writers never submitted that.

                When the studio changed the ending Brancato felt that it ruined the film. He felt that Salvation was a boring premise. A movie that didn't need to be made. The only thing that made the movie worthwhile was the idea of a Terminator choosing to pick up John Connor's mantle. The idea that the symbol of John Connor is so unstoppable that even killing the flesh and blood man can't extinguish it. It would have been a controversial ending, but an incredibly effective one, and one heck of a religious motif. (Because JC has always had religious implications.)
                >"I was blind. But now I see."

                I honestly feel sad because look at Terminator 3. The really standout part of that film is the ending. The director (Jonathan Mostow) had the stones to believe in that ending despite studio pressure to make something less downbeat. But with McG, he just threw out the ending Brancato wrote, and created a film that feels tonally hollow because... what was the point of all this? We watched John Connor waddle around the post-apocalypse for 2 hours. How thrilling.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >future war movie
                >barely any night scenes
                >no purple lasers
                moronic fricks.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >The really standout part of that film is the ending.
                Yep.
                Too many apocalyptic movies and shows never show the downfall.
                Walking dead had the mc ask what happened(he was in a comma because you can easily survive not being fed for several months) and he was told "first the dead came back and then the world turned to shit.
                Is there anything worth watching that shows the downfall?
                Here is a cute pic because this thread is making people upset.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >He felt that Salvation was a boring premise. A movie that didn't need to be made. The only thing that made the movie worthwhile was the idea of a Terminator choosing to pick up John Connor's mantle.

                He's wrong, since T2 came out people have wanted a movie set in the future where JC battled Terminators.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >people have wanted a movie set in the future where JC battled Terminators
                Still kind of a boring premise tbhq, Terminators are only super scary when you don't have easy access to plasma weapons.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The skeleton style ones, sure. But ilthe infiltration units were a thing still plus I wanted to see how humanity beat Skynet in the future.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Could have been cool for a 1980s-1990s animated series for kids

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Arnold shows up and tries to kill rich, smug John Connor. A female terminator, a nanotech assemblage of micro-bots, strives to protect him. Yet it turns out Arnold was sent by the Resistance-- and the nano-chick is Skynet's most nefarious creation of all. See, after the first two pairs of terminators were sent back from 2029 for the first two movies, JC revealed himself to be evil-- a Skynet deep-cover agent. He destroyed/will destroy the human resistance from within. This is all because the female nano-terminator supposedly defending him actually infects him in the present day, with a nanobot that bores deep into his brain. So after Connor betrays humanity in 2032, his mortified wife Kate sends Arnold back to kill John Connor in 2003. (Sarah Connor is already dead of cancer, by the way.) In the film's action, the Arnold terminator fails, nano-b***h kills true love Kate-- but Judgment Day seems to have been prevented yet again (although Connor still has a scrap of Skynet inside his head, the-end-or-is-it?). This script was, admittedly, pretty insane, trippy and multiversive. We were out to conjure some of the dizzy absurdity of the first Terminator. I was happy with the script.
            >It nearly got us fired. Thanks to Mostow's desperate lobbying on our behalf, we were given a few weeks for one last chance. To hell with integrity. Mike and I worked frantically to cobble together what was wanted, namely a far more predictable script. A typically good Arnold saves a down-and-out JC from a Swiss-Army knife terminatrix, etc. It felt safe, expected, paint-by-numbers. We quickly realized the only possible saving grace, the one thing that could begin to justify the film's existence, would be to end the world in the last scenes-- and so return the franchise to the fatalistic integrity of the original "Terminator." I never imagined this would fly.

            >The "development process" involved the usual dumbing and watering down, cutting for budget, gutting character moments, turning anything shaded into black and white. We were told to throw back in elements from the script we were first handed, such as "She'll be back" and stupid sunglasses. We refused to write in a Chili's endorsement, though we suggested "I'll be baby-back, baby-back, baby-back ribs." Another writer came in at the last minute and threw in a few more clunky lines and cringe-worthy moments. The shoot had some near-disasters, including a major part recast after a week of filming, and a budget shortfall that required a cash loan from Schwarzenegger. Mostow actually shot plates for a time bubble arriving in the fallout shelter with yet another Arnold to avert Judgment Day at the last second, just in case focus groups demanded it.
            >When I saw the finished product, I was pretty bummed. The casting choices were dubious, the look too brightly-lit and TV-ish, the campy comedic bits painful to watch. Subtleties that somehow survived development were sacrificed to overly-aggressive editing. Incredibly, the movie did keep our ending. Critics were kinder to "T3" than I'd expected, and while the domestic box office was middling, it did well overseas.
            He also wrote Terminator Salvation because his writing partner needed money and fricking hates "McNugget" the director. Brancato's original screenplay was a soulless cashgrab he didn't want to write, but it was way better than the final product.
            https://imsdb.com/scripts/Terminator-Salvation.html

            Based credible anon

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          What was the twist? I only watched till Salvation

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            John Connor is a terminator.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >For those who don't know, but the twist was spoiled in both the trailer and the movie poster.

        That was deliberate. The people who made Salvation had a meltdown when their "John Conner is a terminator" plot point leaked and panic rewrote the movie, so for Genisys they were trying to own it and get ahead of leaks

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >The people who made Salvation had a meltdown when their "John Conner is a terminator" plot point leaked and panic rewrote the movie
          Bear in mind those people didn't actually write the original Salvation script. The people who wrote Terminator 3 wrote the OG script then McG and his people took it and then sorta tried to take credit for it. It was weird. But apparently people freaked out over the script leak, which is mentioned here

          Contrary to what McG claimed in interviews, the original ending of Salvation is this pic related. All that stuff about Marcus/John getting up off the operating table as a shocking, mean spirited ending was HIS bullshit. The original writers never submitted that.

          When the studio changed the ending Brancato felt that it ruined the film. He felt that Salvation was a boring premise. A movie that didn't need to be made. The only thing that made the movie worthwhile was the idea of a Terminator choosing to pick up John Connor's mantle. The idea that the symbol of John Connor is so unstoppable that even killing the flesh and blood man can't extinguish it. It would have been a controversial ending, but an incredibly effective one, and one heck of a religious motif. (Because JC has always had religious implications.)
          >"I was blind. But now I see."

          I honestly feel sad because look at Terminator 3. The really standout part of that film is the ending. The director (Jonathan Mostow) had the stones to believe in that ending despite studio pressure to make something less downbeat. But with McG, he just threw out the ending Brancato wrote, and created a film that feels tonally hollow because... what was the point of all this? We watched John Connor waddle around the post-apocalypse for 2 hours. How thrilling.

          and the original writer was very upset with the final movie because that ending was the heart and soul of the movie.

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >of shit, we forgot to do promo shots for our movie, what do we do?
    >let's go out onto the parking lot

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What's he shooting at?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      his finger slipped

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The T-1000 is doing its puddle on the ground trick

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      his acting ability

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      lol

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >how do I quickscope?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        he is obviously shooting at the ~~*MP*~~

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      God.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        moron. He's shooting down, so he's shooting at Satan.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      As he should.

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why can't we have cool shit anymore?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      He stole all the ponytails.
      Now he's coming for your birthday

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Main characters get arrested and take mugshots
    >Bad boys (Theme from cops) starts playing

    Which boomer fricking producer made them put that in there?

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'm pretty sure the same company made some of the Resident Evil: The Final Chapter posters. There's some noticeable stylistic similarities in the form of "character head on a photoshopped body holding a gun for some reason".

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Remember that time when they put Ruby Rose in everything and then just poof gone

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        What's interesting is Ruby's Rose's character has a handful of lines, her name is never given, and she gets sucked into a turbine. I can't tell if this was intentional or the film got cut down. Whenever I see a movie that is 100 minutes long or thereabouts I often think about what had to get cut to get it down to that runtime. When you're making genre films -- horror, comedy, stuff like that, studios often like the runtime to be shorter if possible.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        She has a striking and marketable "look" but apparently she's an absolute nightmare to work with.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I remember reading she broke, or at least seriously injured her spine making Batwoman. Never liked her in movies but i absolutely would. Same as kristen Stewart she has that 'lesbian who just needs a good dicking to be set straight' vibe.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You can tell it's photoshop because, bless her, Milla's breasts are not that big.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Ali Larter is so hot, unnnffff.

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Not even aiming
    >Gun pointed at the ground
    >Totally missing whatever the target is
    These promo shots always make me laugh. They obviously put in just as much effort into these pictures as they did the movie. Which is to say: minimal

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Happier and With Your Mouth Open

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why do the guns have gas canisters at the bottom? Is it paintball?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Not american can anyone explain what this "blob clip" magazine is on the top right?

      Plasma.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Blood Gun. Nice.

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Emilia cute. Terrible movie though.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Did they HAVE to give her a Deagle? It's such a big gun and it looks ENORMOUS compared to her.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        She's a 5' 1" hobbit. Everything looks big compared to her.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >He doesn't like big guns on petite women

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          only if they fly backwards with their hat still floating where they were when they try to fire them

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            What if they spin around so hard that their clothes are on backwards?

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous
    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Movie is okay during the quiet parts.

  12. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Genisys is unironically the 3rd best terminator film.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It's homosexual shit

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Genisys is unironically the 3rd best terminator film.

      I watched the whole series recently and completely agree.

  13. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >get in, homosexual.
      >We're making skynet great again

  14. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    So trying to fight robots makes your head taller?

  15. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Not american can anyone explain what this "blob clip" magazine is on the top right?

  16. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Lol

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >tfw terminator is plowing wife

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Matt Smith is so fricking awful

      Why are a bunch of English actors in this film based in LA anyway? Frick off

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Why are a bunch of English actors in this film based in LA anyway? Frick off
        Do you realise how many bongs are in our movies? almost every movie has at least one putting on an accent its weird. Even our Spidermen are bongs.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >AAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHH

  17. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Genysis was a good movie.

  18. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    "Skynets could be anywhere", they said out loud to themselves.

  19. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Those ARs would jam if the dust cover, for some reason, stays closed like that while firing.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *