AI WILL TAKE OVER ANIMATIO-

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I hate pajeets so god damn much

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      https://vocaroo.com/128D0TJi6BhS

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous
    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Why shouldn't I? Before AI they were nothing more than funny in comedy cartoons at worse scammers on credit card calls. Now since AI happened they are unironically everywhere, more than any western woke movement

      >Amerika Birleşik Devletleri written under the video
      >Put it into google translate
      >Auto detect picks up Turkish
      You guys memed yourselves so hard about Indians and AI you didn't even take the first step to actually check and make sure that this video was made by Indians. India isn't the only third world shithole producing this garbage you mongs.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        It's literally the Turkish name of the USA. People on Cinemaphile don't bother to check things anymore, they just make presumptions and get mad about them.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >You guys memed yourselves so hard about Indians and AI you didn't even take the first step to actually check and make sure that this video was made by Indians.
        Ok? You're acting like homosexuals across the world isn't using this shit? That doesn't mean shit about my statement about pajeets being the people SHILLING IT N MASS and behind the funding/support of it in the first place. Actually do YOUR resource and you'll see they are fricking everywhere, every each of Ai links right back to them.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          No, my point is that homosexuals across the world ARE using this shit, and just because a lot of them are Indian doesn't mean that literally every single AI video that comes out is made by Indians. Given your grammar I sincerely doubt that point got through to you though, since you're LITERALLY agreeing with me.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            >and just because a lot of them are Indian doesn't mean that literally every single AI video that comes out is made by Indians.
            And yet, everyone blames Black folk and israelites for the destruction of humanity. You can't exempt this line of critical thinking from pajeets just because you either are one yourself (because only they care about grammar being correct as a scapegoat from being called out) or you're siding with them because you're pro ai yourself.

            Pic related. Stop using this site if you don't understand how discourse works on here.

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              >Only Indians care about grammar on Cinemaphile
              I don't think I've ever seen someone out themselves as a newbie this hard this fast, get the frick out.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                I don't think that making sweeping generalizations about races is "critical thinking" anon. And I'm not pro AI, I literally called it garbage produced by third world shitholes, like India. I attacked your grammar because I strongly suspect you're ESL since you seem to not be able to pick up on any of the points that I'm saying. I'm anti-AI and pointing out that other countries are engaging in the same terrible practices that Indians are, and I think that scapegoating Indians for the entire issue could actually give them more wiggle room in the long-term since it deflects attention away from them.

                >Pic related. Stop using this site if you don't understand how discourse works on here.
                Your discourse is shit, that's not a Cinemaphile problem. That's a (You) problem.

                Sorry, but you're not stopping anyone from shitting on shitskins, so cope and kys.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous
            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              I don't think that making sweeping generalizations about races is "critical thinking" anon. And I'm not pro AI, I literally called it garbage produced by third world shitholes, like India. I attacked your grammar because I strongly suspect you're ESL since you seem to not be able to pick up on any of the points that I'm saying. I'm anti-AI and pointing out that other countries are engaging in the same terrible practices that Indians are, and I think that scapegoating Indians for the entire issue could actually give them more wiggle room in the long-term since it deflects attention away from them.

              >Pic related. Stop using this site if you don't understand how discourse works on here.
              Your discourse is shit, that's not a Cinemaphile problem. That's a (You) problem.

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              >And yet, everyone blames Black folk and israelites for the destruction of humanity.
              This is true, but most anons call someone a "Black person" or a "jew" as an insult and/or to describe someone, and I imagine is the same with calling someone a pajeet. In the end is very funny so I don't mind at all.
              Ex: you could be white and still be a Black person because of the way you act.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Hell, I haven't actually heard of an Indian content farm. 5 Minute Crafts is Russian, Blossom is Thai, Elsagate was mostly vietnamese.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          >Elsagate was mostly vietnamese
          Who knew the Vietnam War wasn't over?

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            War is never over. If we weren't at war we wouldn't need borders.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          India's responsible for all the Johnny Johnny Yes Papa and Mickey on a Railway shit.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          girlgames is 100% indian, there's even a picture of their team floating around

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        /pol/tards just want to say the words

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    why is patrick a pink sponge?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      He forgot to use the regional prompter extension.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      I wouldn't be surprised if that's the same problem as miraculous ladybug, all training material name the hero or the show (which are the same) but not individual characters. the mc is in evrey pics so he tends to become the show, but the sides are just all blurred together. So in the same way Marinette is always in her dot costume and sometime has chat noir's blonde hair, spongebob is often accompanied by something pink or squidlike, but it' spart of him, it's not a separate key word.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        What?

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          to train an AI you need to show it many pictures of what you want it to learn, and each picture must have a list of keywords to recognize. It's likely that nobody took care about nameing Patrick and bob as separate entities, so the AI king have a global vision of the characters together to be "spongebob". bob is more visible because he's likely to be in every picture, while the sidekicks are only there sometime.

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What the frick is this shit?

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Unfettered progression of AI supremacy, brought on by morons kept spouting trust the science but didn't realize it would affect their porn artists livlihoods and tried to pump the brakes.
      Accelerate. Starve and leave aliens the strangest fricking anomalies of media for them to comb through of human history is what I say.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >AI-generated post

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      man man horrors made beyond your comprehension

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why even waste time parallaxing those piece of shit incomprehensible stills? Just rip stills from the show and parallax them.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I'm assuming third worlders made this, specifically stupid Indians because this looks "cutting edge" to them, saar.

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    New Elsagate trend?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      AI is just as lazy as the people who use it. To think this is revolutionary shit is just laughable. There's an animation studio in central London trying to get in on this AI action, I hope to see it flop soon. And I think Aardman (the claymation studio who made Wallace & Gromit) is testing the waters with this too...

      Yes. Kinda... I have a feeling that they might make softcore porn fetish videos with AI and masquerade them as "Kids content" on the platform. Already happening with Digital Circus.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Already happening with Digital Circus.

        I already had a feeling you were a seething homosexual, but now I have proof.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Wat?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Anon, they're not seething over TADC. They're talking about how TADC has been absorbed by content slop farms. Even the creator of TADC is pissed about that.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Ah.
            I take back my homosexualry accusation then.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >And I think Aardman (the claymation studio who made Wallace & Gromit) is testing the waters with this too...
        For what fricking reason? Artificial Intelligence can't replicate stop motion animation.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          They ran out of clay

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            HOW THE FRICK CAN YOU RUN OUT OF CLAY!!!??? FRICKING buttholeS, GO DIG FOR SOME!

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          See what I said here

          [...]
          This, 100%. AI animation, AI art in general today, is in its "madly hallucinating something" phase. There is no connections happening inside the box beyond tokens being activated. It's extremely scattershot yes. The best comparison I heard is that contemporary AI is Tesla's "Level 2" self-driving cars
          > , the car can act autonomously, but requires the driver to monitor the driving at all times and be prepared to take control at a moment's notice.
          And yet you constantly see Teslacucks sitting back watching movies acting like their car can drive itself from one place to another fully autonomously. That's basically AI right now. It's at a level 2 autonomy where it can generate stuff, but it's not supposed to generate the final product, and yet AIbros keep thinking that a single prompt output is true art.
          Yet in the actual research labs, you have people who already figured out how to get to level 4 self-driving with agent-driven AIs that can actually draw full stop and even do their own research (the latter is more what we're worried about; drawing cute girls is a side effect). But no one's popularized that, and it's still largely in training and testing, unless you know how to get a self-operating computer agent workflow running.
          The AIbros don't even want to attempt to wait unfortunately.

          Greedy capitalist types get told by AI researchers that generative AI is basically "digital molecular assemblers" that can do anything (true) but the technology to actually realize that in the form of real life holodeck tech isn't here yet (also true). "AI slop" looks the way it does because that's the result of Proompters not even attempting to put in any effort and just prompting "masterpiece, 4k, beautiful, amazing quality" instead of anything creative (why else would they be using AI lol) but in actuality, there is nothing a generative AI program can't create with a good bit of effort, just like a molecular assembler. But this is like version 0.2 of a molecular assembler, and we're nowhere near an actually ready product.

          Capitalists don't hear most of that. They just hear "I can cut all labor costs now" and rush to exploit it. So they do it. "AI can do anything [in 20 years] so let's make it do horrifyingly unready things today."

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >greedy capitalists
            I'm not a very hateful woman. I really am not. But I am getting really suspicious and sick of how many times these "greedy capitalists" turn out to be Indian. I've never seen an entire race of people embrace something so shitty like AI with such open arms so quicky before, and it's baffling to me. Japanese don't like or dislike it. Chinese are okay with it. Americans either hate it or love it.
            But every single Indian I've ever encountered speaks of AI like it's the Second Coming of Jesus. It's literally always been Indians, every single time, and I just don't get why.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Source? I didn't notice such unusual number of indians in any thread or forum about it. The vast majority of AI hype and debate is from communists that want to know how to use it to reach post scarcity and lead to the colapse of the capitalist system while making sure worker rights don't get purged in the meantime.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It's more anecdotal evidence, but a lot of anecdotes keep bringing up this preponderance of Indian AIbros and tech companies run by Indians obsessed with AI.
                Outside of Cinemaphile and Xitter shitflinging about "AI is the future, cope and go extinct, luddite!" and "AI is theft, every AIbro should be arrested/shot", the actual debate about AI is pretty much rooted in a few truths
                1: current AI is sloppy, a potemkin village of capability that falls apart on the slightest touch because techbros focused entirely on scale
                2: it doesn't have to be this way. There are ways to radically reinforce AI capability RIGHT NOW to make it practical and capable, but the AI companies are led by cultists who don't even know how to code (Sam Altman is the prime example, he's not a computer scientist at all). Some already know how to generalize AI further and even tested it out and showed the results, but the big companies just want scale.
                3: AI will be worth it when it can solve disease and do work for us. Some are angry that AI is drawing pictures and writing poems while we work for pennies when it should be the other way around (technically speaking, AI drawing pictures is a side effect of AI learning to understand what is in a picture; see ImageNet from 2011-2012, and this generative AI shit is a stepping stone to getting to models that can understand the real world enough to DO the drudgery shit we want AI to do)
                4: India's currently hard right wing right now (Hindutva) and escaping poverty, so you have hundreds of millions of English-speaking Indians now getting internet-capable computers looking to make money, and AI's the easiest way to do that it seems
                5: We really need basic income as a first step to alleviate anxieties about unemployment, but the capitalist powers aren't doing shit yet, and AI companies are run by those cultists who just want AGI now (yet keep ignoring the tech that could generalize AI because "sCaLe iS aLl YoU nEeD!!!!")

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                The CEO of Stability AI was an Indian that hired Indian bot farms to spread this shit as hard as possible. Funny thing is he was also an idiot that ran his entire company to the ground recently, so a lot of the usual fervor you saw with AIshit just sort of disappeared immediately.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >i'm not a hateful woman
              >woman
              >rants about pajeets and the tech sector
              doubt.jpg

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              >I'm not a very hateful woman. I really am not
              You're a woman. You're hateful by default.

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              Indians essentially are AI made flesh. They all have a very rote understanding of everything, no creativity, and only really do anything when ordered too.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >AI is basically "digital molecular assemblers" that can do anything (true)
            there's no evidence for this. tech bros high on shitty sci-fi think it's inevitable and fast-approaching because they've created a damn AI religion and believe they're about to build god by scaling the number of sides on and weights in a set of weighted dice. they're moronic.

            what's being called 'AI' right now - largely to dupe venture capitalists, who have been morons... well, always - is literally just weighted adjacency probability calculators. that goes for image generators and text generators. the weights are what transformer architectures merely encode (that architecture is only used for training - nobody knows how to do real-time training, BTW) - but it's not understanding; it's adjacency probability in a high-dimensional space, which still boils down to probability.

            once the weights are encoded (statically, once per model version) based on probability distributions (that's all these things can actually read/replicate) within the training data, the actual operation is just a bog-standard feed-forward neural net system - a series of consecutive unidirectional bipartite graphs - which is provably just a function output approximator (i.e. it copies what's in the training window and can't actually extrapolate), and tech we've had since the fricking 1980s.

            will it disrupt creative fields? already has... but is petering out. will it supplant them? it is staggering how much it is struggling to do so, given its speed and scale. quality matters, and it just can't get there with existing scale. EVEN WITH TEXT. and we've already hit diminishing returns. AND run out of pristine training data to use.

            fun fact: feed-forward NN tech already hit identical barriers to scaling (needing orders of magnitude more computing power just to function at a fraction of the capabilities of biological systems) in the 1990s, which was followed by the AI Winter. we've danced this dance before.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Only people who support AI are people focused on making more content with as little effort as possible. Or bitter people who think all artists "deserve" to be replaced because they stalk specific people's twitters and disagree with them politically.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Only people who support AI are people focused on making more content with as little effort as possible.
                This is me. I'm a writer, and I want to cut out the studios and whatnot in making my own animations. Just need to upgrade my graphics card, and I should be good to go for the most of it.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Good.
                All of your content will be complete shit.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Then I will already be a vast improvement over current shit!

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                As much as you hate the shows today they still won't be nearly as bad as AI generated shit.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            >Greedy capitalist types
            So people who live in reality.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Don't they only have enough excess clay for like one more Wallace and Gromit short? Their go-to clay supplier went out of business a while back.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            I think they're found a new supplier

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Remember the one that copied Vampire Hunter D Bloodlust.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Oh those Corridor fricks? I do now...

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I think of it anytime AI gets brought up as the future of animation and have yet to see anyone defend it.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              The entire drawback to literally ANY AI animation or art right now and defending it as "the future" is rooted in the fact that AI is still not capable enough of coherency. AIbros jumped onto this trend like NFTs because of the profit potential, since unlike NFTs there's an actual technology here. However, AIbros are content with "good enough" (except it's not even good enough, it's just barely coherent at all)
              "It'll be good one day" is a valid argument, but there's no precedent unless you want to use other technologies like the internet
              >tries uploading images and playing a video game on Usenet in 1989
              >"I swear it'll be amazing one day"

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                In fact, the methods that can fix almost all the problems AI has with coherency aren't even a secret, they're just only recently understood

                > If there is actual multi-dimensional "conceptual understanding" in transformer-based Auto-Regressive Large Language Models, why do they hallucinate, make mistakes in reasoning, and appear to be regurgitating their training data?

                > The reason this occurs is because the transformer architecture is a mathematical construct based on what the field hoped would create "intelligence", but not on what the true, final, most efficient and performant, AGI-correct algorithm will be. This architecture has been chosen and continually developed on in the past 5 years because it outperformed all previous methods, and so, the field decided to continue using the architecture, irrespective of any failure modes, because it still provided results, that continue to improve with scale. The fact that performance continues to improve with scale, led to this becoming the dominant architecture.

                AI right now is sloppy (fitting term) because the AIbros who made these algorithms just cared about scale and nothing else. They care about "parameter count"

                And when AI isn't sloppy anymore, well HOPEFULLY "AI can make perfect cartoons" is largely a moot topic because we'll be up to our skulls in much bigger debates about what AI can do.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >And I think Aardman (the claymation studio who made Wallace & Gromit) is testing the waters with this too...
        For what fricking reason? Artificial Intelligence can't replicate stop motion animation.

        Speaking of Aardman... This same channel made a cheap AI story of Shaun the sheep LOL

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Jewbacca

    >AI still not concept-anchored to ground it and prevent hallucinations
    >all AIs lack agency and tree search
    >higher dimensional concepts so scattered even in larger models that prompting remains a crapshoot
    >Memory still short, would require much more advanced dynamic context windows to properly keep knowledge and consistency
    Maybe in a few years yeah, but contemporary AI is not capable. The key to it will be iterative agentic workflow loops.
    You could resolve most hallucinations with an adversarial agent workflow right. I even told this to my e/acc project lead. Bizarrely little has been done with this yet.
    You could have agent swarms manage to draw manually in Krita, learning from raw visual input. Yet the field is still obsessed with diffusion-based models.

    So maybe one day soon, but we're not there yet, and the reactions against this stuff are warranted when it looks like a bad DMT trip.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Thanks but perhaps some of us don't want all the world's water to disappear

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I mean, the water isn't annihilated, they either reuse it or throw it away so there's still the same amount of water on the planet.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Thanks but perhaps some of us don't want all the world's water to disappear
        sez u

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Let me also buck the trend to say that various people in the field know how to reach general intelligence agents. It's very much possible now, but the full breadth of how to get there only recently came into view. So I don't doubt that we'll go from shitty bizarro nonsense one year to AI generated economies the next.

      The biggest secret was concept anchoring in propositional logic. Brute forcing agency with agent swarms is almost unnecessary.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Jewbacca

        Aye.
        I've no idea when we'll see the first GI-agent be shown off, though. Current AI's gotten boring.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Let me also buck the trend to say that various people in the field know how to reach general intelligence agents. It's very much possible now, but the full breadth of how to get there only recently came into view. So I don't doubt that we'll go from shitty bizarro nonsense one year to AI generated economies the next.

      The biggest secret was concept anchoring in propositional logic. Brute forcing agency with agent swarms is almost unnecessary.

      This, 100%. AI animation, AI art in general today, is in its "madly hallucinating something" phase. There is no connections happening inside the box beyond tokens being activated. It's extremely scattershot yes. The best comparison I heard is that contemporary AI is Tesla's "Level 2" self-driving cars
      > , the car can act autonomously, but requires the driver to monitor the driving at all times and be prepared to take control at a moment's notice.
      And yet you constantly see Teslacucks sitting back watching movies acting like their car can drive itself from one place to another fully autonomously. That's basically AI right now. It's at a level 2 autonomy where it can generate stuff, but it's not supposed to generate the final product, and yet AIbros keep thinking that a single prompt output is true art.
      Yet in the actual research labs, you have people who already figured out how to get to level 4 self-driving with agent-driven AIs that can actually draw full stop and even do their own research (the latter is more what we're worried about; drawing cute girls is a side effect). But no one's popularized that, and it's still largely in training and testing, unless you know how to get a self-operating computer agent workflow running.
      The AIbros don't even want to attempt to wait unfortunately.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >agency
      >tree research
      >higher dimensional concepts
      >scattered
      >larger models
      >memory length
      >dynamic context window

      explain this like i'm a 1800 industrial worker struggling to feed his family of 6

      • 2 weeks ago
        Jewbacca

        >explain this like i'm a 1800 industrial worker struggling to feed his family of 6

        The machines that the business lords are trying to replace you with theoretically could be run to produce everything and more and, hypothetically, you ought to get either much cheaper food to feed your family among other things or you could revolt and take control of those machines right when they are basically able to make you and everyone in your slum live like a literal French aristocrat, but the business lords don't actually know how to make the machines and are telling the people making the machines to make them bigger and faster instead of better and more capable, all so they can sell them to other business lords as a hot new thing, while the actual engineers probably plan to kill those business lords at some point and create a mass techno-aristocracy that may or may not include you depending on who wins (the techno-fully auto luxury communists or the Thiel-techno feudalists)

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          kek i meant actually give a qrd on those concepts

          • 2 weeks ago
            Jewbacca

            Sorry, just used to a lot of people being insincere when it comes to explaining AI.
            It's actually really complicated, but I'll do my best

            >agency
            Current hot new thing in AI labs are "agents", which performs tasks and uses tools on behalf of a user. All the AI you use now don't use agents, or at most can browse the internet badly using spiders. Agents can act autonomously, and the more capable the base model, the more capable the agents.
            > tree search
            Referring to Monte Carlo tree search. Step by step planning, basically. Generative AI doesn't do this. It's all zero shot, like making someone write an essay in one single pass with no time to think or backspace, or draw an image in one line without thinking about what it looks like.
            >higher dimensional concepts
            This one's super mathy, A "concept" in a transformer-based auto-regressive LLM is a coherent neuronal state or activation pattern across the neural network's layers that forms a multi-dimensional numeric representation of what us humans know as an "idea" or "concept", in terms of human-written language, which itself is a lower resolution projection space of "concepts" in human-spoken language, which itself is a lower resolution projection space of thought. That sounds esoteric, but it's really just machine learning statistical modeling stuff, nothing magical

            >larger models
            OpenAI and their ilk want to add more parameters to their models because new abilities seem to emerge from scaling. A 100 billion parameter model out of the box can do things that even a fine-tuned 1-billion parameter model can't.
            >memory length/context window
            How many tokens (a set of characters) can be recalled directly by the model. Cinemaphile allows 2,000 characters per message, so assuming each character = token (not common), an AI with a context window of 2,000 tokens would only be able to recall this post, and a second post would cause catastrophic forgetting

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >This one's super mathy, A "concept" in a transformer-based auto-regressive LLM is a coherent neuronal state or activation pattern across the neural network's layers that forms a multi-dimensional numeric representation of what us humans know as an "idea" or "concept"

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              agents seem like a QoL / automation improvement
              >ai lacks tree research
              but isn't this done by iterating over previous results? or you meant that the algorithm should only return something that's already iterated partially and internally as it [does stuff] that results in a more accurate to prompt return?
              >activation pattern across the neural network's layers that forms a multi-dimensional numeric representation of what us humans know as an "idea" or "concept"
              you mean how the AI create it's uuh internal reference database? "this prompt is 0.9 proximity points to this number so i'm using this pattern"
              >How many tokens (a set of characters) can be recalled directly by the model.
              i have no idea how this relates to anything else. you mean the size of the prompt it can process or how much information it can turn into patterns in one go?

              please be gentle i've got uuuh 3 and a half webdev certificates on freecodecamp

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        it just a Cinemaphile ai-jeet buzzwords, nothing important or valuable for average person.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Those are def not AIjeet buzzwords. AIbros don't know even a quarter of those terms. I'm more not making the connection of what they have to do with AIslop

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous
    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I can’t tell how much of this is genuinely accurate and how much of this is tripBlack person schizo rambling

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        It's right about the issues, but the solution is dumb for the same reason that self-driving cars are dumb. Why bother paying technicians to maintain and clean up after an expensive machine that can still break down and would be prohibitive to any profit when paying more people slightly less to work on something works fine? Besides, it won't be able to veer into any interesting territory or correct itself, which is why those cars fail because they misunderstand the point of knowledge. This will just create a macro for drawing the same thing over and over.

        The real way to do it, which is also not going to be profitable, is going to be grids. Just build models based on specific parts of images that can generate your image in a grid form and then bash them together.

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    AI doesn’t know how to draw Patrick?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Probably needs a LoRA for it.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      if the word "spongebob" is in the prompt, half of the characters are going to look like him. there will even be multiple spongebobs in the same image

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Pajeets and Californians in the Mud

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >that patrick
    my sides

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    AI can be kinda neat as a reference generator (As in, kinda seeing parts of your idea take form so that you can fix it before you put pen to paper) but anyone who uses it for an entire process are dumb as shit.
    It's like those shitty AI 4k remasters.

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    A human being thought this looked okay and threw it on YouTube. They couldn't be to assed to make their own logo so they used AI to make it.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      If people are going to accept it then they'll make it, not caring how shitty it looks, because all they want is money and nothing more.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >A human being
      I looked at the channel and it uploads like 10 of these abominations PER DAY, so either it's automated or it's some indian barely looking at the result and throwing it in there. Seems to be working too, looking at popular some of the videos have 10k+ views.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Youtube Kids on autoplay without parent supervision.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        They don't even watch what AI spit out. Just enter prompt and upload whatever it made with aggressive SEO description and tags.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Nobody ever thought this looked ok. This was made by empty husks of people.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yes anon we already established Indians made this

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      To be fair, the person who uploaded it probably didn't watch it themselves. They were too busy writing prompts for the next video

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      To be fair, the person who uploaded it probably didn't watch it themselves. They were too busy writing prompts for the next video

      it's 100% automated

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        This gets me worried that one day there will be more AI-generated content on Youtube, or even the internet, than things made by humans. It can spit out endless amounts of slop for free and never get tired.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >one day
          give it 2 years and i'm being optimistic. they didn't need AI to make bot videos.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            They at least had to make their own foundation for shit like finger families. They had to draw the hand correctly and place nodes where their swapped google images would be. Regardless, there was still a fraction of THEIR content in it, even if recycled hundreds of times. Now they don't even need to do that.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It could be even worse than that. AI will eventually be trained on erroneous AI content, which then AI will consider is correct, rather than failing to meet the correct way of doing things.
          For example, AI will consider it normal for people to have a variable amount of fingers on their hands than trying to make it five, then failing, so it won't even try to make hands correct.
          It's going to be AI training AI deluding itself it's common mistakes are correct.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          Anon there's already more AI generated images than there are photos taken by humans since the 1980s. This shit is flooding the internet is an exponential rate, and something's gotta give.

  12. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >ITT

  13. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >gets lazy and just loops the images

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      as if the entire fricking thing isn't the laziest shit ever to make money

  14. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Will toddlers growing up with this literal nonsense over shit like Arthur and Franklin have consequences?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They're viewing this confusing stuff during their formative years, which will have lifetime consequences. That's why preschool shows typically focus on the basics of being a good person, dealing with problems and life, and foundational aspects of education. The aim was to prepare kids for the real world. Since AI is often wrong and confusing at best and nightmare fuel at worst, they're going to grow up thinking it's how the real world works.
      In short, gen alpha is 100% fricked and nobody cares.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It already is, considering there's a whole generation that thinks watching PBS over cable toy commercials means you're poor or a hick.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Preschool vs. Elementary school shows.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Arthur
          >Preschool
          Sorry, you've got brainrot too.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Just the way they speak indicates it's a preschool show. Sorry anon.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >the way they speak
              Oh, you mean like a fable? I guess you also think the Brothers Grimm and Aesop are for preschoolers.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                No they speak in a very clear manner so the audience can't misconstrue what they're saying.
                It also aired on the same block as Sesame Street and Barney.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Oh, you mean like how writing's supposed to be done?

                >same block

                Demonstrably untrue. But then I bet you love feeling superior to pay more for less because it means you don't have to deal with a public service.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I don't know why you're so defensive. In the late 90s when I was 6 or 7 was when everyone my same age was done with PBS kids and moved on to Nickelodeon or toy commercials. If you watched it at an older age there's nothing wrong with it, but facts are facts.

  15. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Baby Shark aficionados are going to be all over this

  16. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Will AI get to the point that is could essentially make an episode of a low budget show that aired on TV for you? Something like Johnny Test on its later seasons.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Wasn't there a GPT powered South Park experiment that was churning out storylines and doing bare minimum animation?

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        I saw that. The plot was an incoherent mess, the staging was a disaster, and the characters said nothing interesting and even repeated boring things three or four times.
        They even lied by doing some post production work. People need to stop faking AI tech demos. They're also trying it again with this: https://twitter.com/fablesimulation/status/1796245808066740274

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          AI Generated South Park would still be funnier than anything Trey Parker could come up with, since there'd be less Randy.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            No not really

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              >episode is about deepfakes
              Subtlety is dead.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        I saw that. The plot was an incoherent mess, the staging was a disaster, and the characters said nothing interesting and even repeated boring things three or four times.
        They even lied by doing some post production work. People need to stop faking AI tech demos. They're also trying it again with this: https://twitter.com/fablesimulation/status/1796245808066740274

        AI Generated South Park would still be funnier than anything Trey Parker could come up with, since there'd be less Randy.

        South Park allegedly used AI to write part of an episode as a joke in the AI episode where Stan decides to solve his problems using AI at the end of the episode and it spits out a cliche happy ending (which actually happens).

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          If it's plot-dependent and part of the joke, then I see no problem with it.

  17. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    nuke india.

  18. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    AI firms are running out of VC capital. For all it can do, there is no clear use case for it yet. Running AI requires large data centres, and running GPU's at full power almost 24 (the equivalent of running a microwave all day to make funny images).

  19. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's really cool how they gave the scenes depth, I've never really seen it done that well actually.

  20. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    pajeets have zero ability to feel shame

  21. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    wtf

  22. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    the fricking AI can't draw SpongeBob right

  23. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    lol

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >pajeet profile picture
      >uploads AI slop
      Every fricking time lmao

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Hey thats not funny. delete that offensive pic. Indjins are just making use of legally available tools. Also have a deep rich culture and territory to be proud of. Jealous much?

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          I thought Chinks were progressing faster when it comes to tech.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          Yes, I am very jealous of their designated shitting on the streets and at the beach.

  24. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    GOOD MORNING SIR!
    >*shits in New Delhi street*

  25. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    AI comics when?

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >AI generated comic
      >converges on Batman reference
      prescient in more ways than one

  26. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Honestly shit like Novelai really does make me think it's gonna be so over for irl artists in a couple of years, i say this as a drawgay myself..
    Granted pic related isn't perfect, but it's weird and blackpilling that i can just ape a particular artists whole style with enough training data

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >Granted pic related isn't perfect, but it's weird and blackpilling that i can just ape a particular artists whole style with enough training data
      Not really, I feel like most people don’t actually know how an art style works tbh, though between Cinemaphile and Cinemaphile over the years I’m genuinely surprised the vast majority of people don’t get how animation works either

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >though between Cinemaphile and Cinemaphile over the years I’m genuinely surprised the vast majority of people don’t get how animation works either

        Some of the people on Cinemaphile are bitter about the current state of animation and desperately want it to fall a part because they think it'll help get back at a specific group of artists they don't like and if other artists have to suffer then so be it
        Cinemaphile is full of ironic weebs who give no shits about the current state of their industry and simply want to consume slop after slop so long as they think the slop makes Westerners seethe
        And then you have the few artists within these circles who are moronic because they got into the art business thinking they'd make bank and didn't realize they're be competition and effort involved

        So there's a group of people in circles that overlap that have no idea how Ai works and in some cases want it to succeed because of they're own bitterness

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          It comes down to politics and assuming if the opposite was making the shows they'd automatically be good.
          Mr. Birchum proved that to be false. Two sides of the same shit coin.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            It also wasn't a Comedy first, which is detrimental to any Comedy.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            The political west needs to completely and utterly die holy shit. This black vs white left vs right us vs them shit needs to become globally outlawed for the sake of actual normal, sane people to not have to deal with this level of autism.

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              >This black vs white left vs right us vs them shit needs to become globally outlawed
              Only if Isreal becomes globally outlawed.

  27. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    gah

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Brains in a treasure chest.. Almost like it could inspire a new fromsoft mimic

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >brain in a box
      This is a self portrait of the artist.

  28. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Shit like this actually makes me feel sorry for the kids that stumble upon garbage like this. Like there's a part of me that wants to make an entertaining show for children that won't overstimulate their minds unlike shit like Cocomelon.

    Granted I think the average kid who's on YouTube all day would look at this AI garbage and just click off of it in an instant.

  29. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    I’m not the sharpest tool in the crayon box, but I feel like this shit has to hit some kind of breaking point when it comes to bandwidth/hosting
    I don’t know if any of you guys have came across what I’m talking about, but I’ve seen Deviantart accounts that have anywhere from a couple thousand to THIRTY-FIVE THOUSAND generations, this can’t actually be viable for companies when dudes are clearly just generating and uploading shit just for the sake of it, right?
    And when resolutions/file sizes get larger, shits only going to get worse on that end

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Youtube was already considering deleting inactive accounts to save on storage

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >Techjeets uploading hundreds of 4K60FPS AI “animations” a day
      >Youtube completely implodes because the storage can’t handle it
      Mega kek

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        in an ideal future, there would be a single AI model that could hold billions of movies by itself, and it would barely take a few thousands megs of data

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      you are absolutely correct, and for more than just storage reasons - AI slop has among the lowest audience draws of anything on their sites. it takes up staggering amounts of storage for very little ad revenue and very poor retention of viewers (since they can generally just... AI slop their own stuff). nobody really wants the end product now that they've seen its real-world limitations and the hype has died down, and the quality... has hit a plateau.

      that plateau is from another bandwidth problem: these models are running up against the hard limits of what can be trained using existing data, and what can be computed with existing tech. scaling is not an endless magic bullet (we just flat out don't have infinite data to train with, for one thing), and we're moving out of the phase where hype from stuff like DallE was enough by itself to garner enough VC funding to run GPU farms for staggering losses.

      remember - this is what crypto bros pivoted to. they're doing the 'line go up' thing again. it's literally all they ever do.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        It's crazy how AI generated slop has flood EVERY site thay doesn't ban it, even then some shit slides through and they managed to have over tens of millions of images in months compared to the average collection by multiple people over a decade. When is the breaking point because even the most profitable websites are trying to save as much bandwidth as they can. And over what? Incestuous AI

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Maybe this can be the bottleneck that will kill off shitty AIslop? Right now the biggest issue is most people are just too uneducated to accurately tell what looks dogshit and what looks soulful by humans, but most can usually "feel" genuineness when they see it so as more and more dogshit Ai gets shitted out despite the tech "improving" more and more people will started telling the difference between quality and dogshit so the viewership of ai crap will drop further and further, and will force these prompters to either start making actual quality content aka takes time aka will go against their philosophy even using AI in the first place aka they quit and stop flooding the internet with their slop, or have all of their dogshit deleted to keep from having the internet itself crash from their bloat.

        It's the only way I can see things working out for us all in the end.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          >most people are just too uneducated to accurately tell what looks dogshit and what looks soulful
          give them time. there's an instinctual response, as you mentioned with 'feel', and it's generally accurate - most normies haven't been trained to spot AI generated slop easily yet because it's still so new, but many have already reached that point (and staggeringly quickly, too - the ability for people to recognize AI generated stuff has happened much, MUCH faster than AI generated slop has increased in quality; human audiences adapting to it wasn't really something the early hype of "you can't tell it's AI" accounted for)

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      It's like how taking a photograph is faster and cheaper than painting an illustration times a million, because the camera doesn't exist in physical space and it requires no input on the user end apart from writing some text
      It's ludicrous that art sites accepted it into their fold in the first place, it's like if Newgrounds one day accepted people uploading 240p cellphone videos and it drowned out all the original content into oblivion, like what happened to early youtube

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Wow, when you say it like this, aibros plese keep making shitty sloppa so youtube and israelitegle can finally stop pouring tons of money into you and ban you off their sites

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      I think the crazy part is that AIgays will jump through any hoops to make their stuff not look AIgenned or even just take the lazy option and not list their stuff as AI on sites with that marker, so this is probably going to be an inevitability since it’ll probably get to a point where there’s no real way to tell, even with some kind of detecting technology (because it’ll probably never look “perfect”, but will fall into some ambiguous level of human-ish error)

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      I really hope that kemono party bans slop soon for this reason

  30. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    May chaos take the world

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >implying AI isn't the chaos

  31. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >bot farms will be endlessly generating content that gets likes and shares from more bots who reply with botted comments
    Can we make an Internet 2 now, current internet fricking sucks

  32. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Wait until you find out that AI fundamentally contradicts the Logos and is therefore impossible under the will of this universe

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >Wait until you find out that AI fundamentally contradicts the Logos
      I’m not brainmaxxed enough to understand that

  33. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Why is everyone in this thread blaming indians?

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Every single activist of tech and AI has been indian
      I just recently went into trying to learn how to make a website and literally 99% of videos I found on the topic was the most broken engrish pajeet scam marketer type of people, both men and women, behind those videos. It's just factual they are involved in all this.

  34. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >Ai images
    >Ai voice
    Probably automated

  35. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Why is this thread so racist towards India?

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Part-/pol/, part that one weird propaganda "film" about pajeets.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Why shouldn't I? Before AI they were nothing more than funny in comedy cartoons at worse scammers on credit card calls. Now since AI happened they are unironically everywhere, more than any western woke movement

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Because those Ed-boys are always up to scams

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      should have realized that Apu was possibly the best representation India ever had

  36. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    I don't see what the fuss is all about.
    You frickers constantly b***h about animation being made in sweatshops somewhere in asia and now that there's a potential solution you get all pissy about it because it looks "soulless"?

    You morons need to realize entertainment jobs are the least important irl. They produce nothing vital like food or resources and there's virtually no guarantee you're gonna get a return in your investment, so it makes sense people don't wanna invest in animation.

    AI literally fixes this by doing the unimportant jobs for free.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >CEOs be like

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Because AI generated content is fricking dogshit.

        You're sacrificing a job that no one but you stating they don't want with an implication that produces shit no one wants to look at. We don't like looking at humans making dogshit, but 99% of the time that's thanks to your exec overlords you keep whiteknighting as never doing wrong when there's ample proof of quality content out there without the use of AI, and fair treatment to the team of people doing the "inbetween" work.

        Stop with this bullshit. The system is the problem, removing the works with machines isn't fixing the problem, it's only putting it in overdrive to produce the same shitty slop but 1000 times faster.

        You morons need to realize entertainment products like animation are way less likely to get a return of investment than essential products like food or water. The success of non-essential shit is bound to the whim of the masses. It makes zero sense to give your money to produce something that's most likely gonna bomb.

        Money talks, no matter how much you b***h and whine.

        >You morons need to realize entertainment jobs are the least important irl.
        why do sportsgays get so much money

        >why do sportsgays get so much money
        Because it's an illusion. Only 1% of all athletes in the world are actually millionaires. The rest have to scrape for leftovers. Why do you think there's so many athletes going bankrupt?

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          >It's ok if literal dogshit is mass produced because money.
          Don't you have some angel investors to harass about your "revolutionary" idea that's going to change everything?

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          Oh well, if it's for the worthy cause of making the funny imaginary numbers go up I guess I can let it slide.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          >You morons need to realize entertainment products like animation are way less likely to get a return of investment than essential products like food or water.
          Then that literally means all entertainment should get the Aislopage treatment too, like sports, music, etc. If "survival" is the only reason for ai to be allowed to exist, then my question is, why did we not need AI millions of years ago? What about humans back then made living without AI work but not now? What changed?

          >It makes zero sense to give your money to produce something that's most likely gonna bomb.
          Funny, you gays said the same about NFTs yet here we are.

          >Money talks, no matter how much you b***h and whine.
          You don't have any money to be making this argument.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          The funny part is that people actually believe this nonsense.

          Replacing artists only requires a computer, since especially most art is done digitally anyway even if it's done by humans. Replacing a janitor not only requires a computer, but also a robot body to do the actual work. Add to this the simple fact that human janotors get paid jack shit to begin with, and it should be easy to understand to anyone with half a brain that it's both easier and more financially viable to replace the artist. Assuming AI keeps up its pace of development and doesn't hit some unforseen hard cap at some point, all of the jobs that are going to be replaced by AI are exactly the ones that are (relatively) expensive when done by humans and which require zero physical labour. Programmers, artists, writers, musicians, investors, CEOs, lawyers, consultants, analyists, the list goes on... If your job requires you to physically do shit and doesn't pay much, there is basically zero incentive to replace you with AI.

          Just look at jobs that could easily be replaced 100% even with today's technology if you need further proof. Why do most stores still use human cashiers when we've had self check-out counters for years and in most cases they work very well? Because you can pay a human a starvation wage and they'll still smile and pack your groceries for you.

          Who the frick cares about if it's economically viable if it results in everything being dogshit? It doesn't matter how cheap it is to produce if nobody ends up consuming it because it's too low-quality.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            the part they never talk about is the product has no mass appeal, and in fact all evidence points STRONGLY towards it having mass un-appeal - there's no market for the product.

            meaning the whole "it's economical" thing is just fricking moronic. it doesn't matter if it's cheaper if it can't replicate the same demand. cardboard is cheaper than wood, but nobody's buying cardboard houses. cardboard houses need to be more than just "cheaper and more efficient to produce" to be economical.

            oh, and they also don't tell you how much AI generated stuff is discarded and essentially waste (even for AIgay standards), which has to be sifted through by actual people still. the tech demos are never, EVER done in one shot.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >You morons need to realize entertainment jobs are the least important irl.
      why do sportsgays get so much money

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Because AI generated content is fricking dogshit.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      You're sacrificing a job that no one but you stating they don't want with an implication that produces shit no one wants to look at. We don't like looking at humans making dogshit, but 99% of the time that's thanks to your exec overlords you keep whiteknighting as never doing wrong when there's ample proof of quality content out there without the use of AI, and fair treatment to the team of people doing the "inbetween" work.

      Stop with this bullshit. The system is the problem, removing the works with machines isn't fixing the problem, it's only putting it in overdrive to produce the same shitty slop but 1000 times faster.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >it's only putting it in overdrive to produce the same shitty slop but 1000 times faster
        this shit is the worst. it's so bad that its been fricking with people's search engine results because of how bloated every site has gotten with absolute trash

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Outsourcing to sweatshops wouldn't be a thing if corporations weren't cheap bastards to begin with

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Animating right here in America was the standard until around the 70's, which I consider the worst decade of animation.
        As bad as things are now, they're still a far cry from then.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      AI was supposed to do boring menial stuff and give us time to make art, not the exact inverse.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        The funny part is that people actually believe this nonsense.

        Replacing artists only requires a computer, since especially most art is done digitally anyway even if it's done by humans. Replacing a janitor not only requires a computer, but also a robot body to do the actual work. Add to this the simple fact that human janotors get paid jack shit to begin with, and it should be easy to understand to anyone with half a brain that it's both easier and more financially viable to replace the artist. Assuming AI keeps up its pace of development and doesn't hit some unforseen hard cap at some point, all of the jobs that are going to be replaced by AI are exactly the ones that are (relatively) expensive when done by humans and which require zero physical labour. Programmers, artists, writers, musicians, investors, CEOs, lawyers, consultants, analyists, the list goes on... If your job requires you to physically do shit and doesn't pay much, there is basically zero incentive to replace you with AI.

        Just look at jobs that could easily be replaced 100% even with today's technology if you need further proof. Why do most stores still use human cashiers when we've had self check-out counters for years and in most cases they work very well? Because you can pay a human a starvation wage and they'll still smile and pack your groceries for you.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          that sucks though
          that's inimical to life
          that needs to be stopped

  37. 1 week ago
    Anonymous
  38. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    I'm not Indian, I'm just pointing out that the video wasn't made by Indians. I don't get this recent trend on Cinemaphile where denying a blatant lie makes you part of X group.

  39. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    sorry mang, I’m not getting in the factory no matter how much you complain

  40. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Yeah but this channel

    lol

    is undoubtedly Indian judging by the profile icon.

  41. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Nikola Tesla was right.

  42. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    What is it with tech guys attempting to get money with technology that is either worse for consumers than the already existing stuff or has no use case at all?

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Get rich quick schemes, wanting to get as much money as possible before jumping ship without any regard for how it effects consumers.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Get rich quick schemes, wanting to get as much money as possible before jumping ship without any regard for how it effects consumers.

      The industry is a pump and dump. There are no passionate studio owners anymore, they all use talent to promote their mediocre friends. Theres even wallstreet/blackrock money involved. These mediocre friends drive talent away and now you have a collapsing industry and the morons who did it at the top. The only future is rich kids making terrible israeli animation, or talented people moving somewhere cheap so they can make good stuff.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >There are no passionate studio owners anymore
        This is so true, they're all cowards who use artists

  43. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Its inevitable, as time goes on animation has only gotten worse, the cheaper, the lazier the less skill required for animating, the more artists latch onto it.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      You already see this happening in real time. AI generated content is actively making people lazier and dumber, and only emboldening those who are already incredibly lazy and dumb. You can't say this shit is a "tool" when it's exclusively used as a crutch for the most worthless dregs society has to offer.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Lol. Those are usually high school and college kids too.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        The problem is that they're not coding in rust.

  44. 1 week ago
    Anonymous
  45. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    UNCIRCUMCISED SPONGE DICK

  46. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >Gold dublins

  47. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Give AI some time, by 2026 AI will improve dramatically.

  48. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    They are remaking old Mangas with AI

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >Doraemon is getting less futuristic each year

      AI comics when?
      grim

  49. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    what if you morons posted AI shit with actual practical uses instead of scrying the depths of youtube for bottom of the barrel pajeetslop?

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Because the internet discussion about AI has been well poisoned to focus almost exclusively on artists, despite the technology having incredibly broad-reaching implications for everything from medicinal fields by figuring out new chemical combinations to restorative fields like the example you just posted. Art is flashy and has a wow factor and it creates a discourse around which people can debate, and people online are desperate to debate fricking anything these days. I don't even like AI art myself but the degree to which it's soaked up the entire conversation is absurd, AI could be used to save fricking trillions of manhours in any field that requires large amounts of sorting and help push several fields to new heights, but no, it's gotta be all about art and artists and third world scamming shit.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Lets see... The thread would be met with a lot of scorn because AI is considered bad around these parts or something. No matter how many examples of what good AI can do, it's not going to change the minds of many here, especially on a comics and cartoon board.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        The bad severely outway the good. What good can nuclear power give us if evil people create nukes with it on average?

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >"real use case"
      >literally just copy-pasting walk cycles
      >nobody in the comments knows

      we've already had the "60fps cartoon" fad. nobody gives a shit about this 'useful' tool because it's not actually useful (output isn't nearly tunable enough to be worthwhile for animators, and that's a fundamental limitation of all of these AI tools without architecture breakthroughs)

      Lets see... The thread would be met with a lot of scorn because AI is considered bad around these parts or something. No matter how many examples of what good AI can do, it's not going to change the minds of many here, especially on a comics and cartoon board.

      AI gays have no idea how the things they're trying to 'replace' actually work, which is why everybody shits on them - they deserve it.

      they did the SAME EXACT THING when they were all still crypto gays

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        *>nobody in the comments knows why you would use different walk cycles or understands that animation isn't just frame-to-frame interpolation

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      That still looks like slop. This should only be used for moments that has nothing to do with emotions, because it looks like these characters become deer in highlights like it doesn't know how to express emotion, because it can't, it's not human.

      Typical physics based movements could do with AI since the focus is just timing but all human interactions should be done only by humans.

  50. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    This thread is a cruel reminder of how many indians there are online, and how Cinemaphile is suffering from this just as bad as anywhere else.

    I wonder what percentage of posts these days are from some kind of third worlder.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Didn't we already establish that picrel is Turkish?

  51. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    https://youtube.com/shorts/FlNmwgLPoRI?si=BBG3fBRjIdwSpVvO

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *