that gay little dragonfly vehicle they stole outright from Jodorowsky that the filmmakers pointlessly tried to build tension with as they tried to start it 3 times like a knackered old morris marina.
This is like accusing starship troopers of stealing power armor as a concept from fallout. But I don't know why I expected your average film moron on Cinemaphile to know anything about books
The American Psycho weaponized autism is evidence of that, but some people have read the book and actually don’t have to ask stupid questions and it doesn’t go a mile over their heads
>Denis Villeneuve
what did you expect? You get what you always get. Long movie because long movies make people think its good. Effort justification, meaning you make yourself think its good because you put time in it. One hour story, and two hours are filled with staring into nothing, walking and traveling.
good summary.
I'm almost certain that washed out colours make normies instinctively regard a movie as more serious. it's the only explanation for the style becoming so ubiquitous.
Better in every way
the characters are so generic it hurts. The book can't be that bad. The setting is great, the story sounds good, but holy shit was anyone supposed to feel anything at all seeing a faction get annihilated that we knew nothing about? Like the Red Wedding where we don't know about the Starks or Lannisters.
>misunderstanding soft scifi
Soft scifi in general isn't meant to be enjoyed by adults. It has zero substance and only focuses on character building rather than introducing complex and interesting sci-fi concepts or some unforgettable ending. These movies aren't bad, you just weren't meant to enjoy them.
>Denis Villeneuve
what did you expect? You get what you always get. Long movie because long movies make people think its good. Effort justification, meaning you make yourself think its good because you put time in it. One hour story, and two hours are filled with staring into nothing, walking and traveling.
I'm almost certain that washed out colours make normies instinctively regard a movie as more serious. it's the only explanation for the style becoming so ubiquitous.
>washed out colours make normies instinctively regard a movie as more serious.
Video games were doing this for a few years to make themselves seem more realistic.
They did that shit with The Batman too. It could’ve been an otherwise decent movie, but they really were trying too hard to top TDK. So you got a bloated, boring movie that was way too long with characters spending lots of time just walking and staring slowly.
>“He was walking with an assistant, very slowly,” Villeneuve told the Wall Street Journal. “It was like seeing Jesus walking into a temple. Everybody became super silent, and there was a kind of sacred moment. Everyone was in awe. It was so beautiful and powerful—I was moved to tears."
Him on Leto in 2049. >"She is an autonomous creative force. A cultural icon in the making. A person driven by pure inspiration, empathy, and respect for her craft, who uses authenticity as a new superpower"
Him on Zendaya.
No, I'm a big Lynch and Dune fan as well. The only thing is that it's more accurate to the books, as in it doesn't cut out a bunch of scenes like the Villeneuve film but I still prefer the new one.
Yes. It's of course pretty bad for his standard, but it's still much better than contemporary popcorn blockbusters, even though the second half was completely butchered in editing.
the characters are so generic it hurts. The book can't be that bad. The setting is great, the story sounds good, but holy shit was anyone supposed to feel anything at all seeing a faction get annihilated that we knew nothing about? Like the Red Wedding where we don't know about the Starks or Lannisters.
it's early YA ficion where Paul is a Marty Stu who gets to be emperor of the universe at 18 and have two women lusting after his boypenis. in the second book there is even a plot point where his actions lead to the off-screen deaths of tens of billions but the main emphasis is that we should feel sorry for him because it makes him feel sad. it's one of those books whose fans reveal their lack of critical thinking ability.
They are still mostly generic in the books (they are all superhumans) but when you strip of them the context, they look a bit too simple
paul is supposed to be a (possible) future messiah, duke is an extremely charismatic leader who makes everyone a devotee of him, jessica belongs to the most important religious organization of the universe whose members exist only to serve them and she breaks their code (or does she?), duncan and gurney are (for now) merely the greatest warriors of the universe, the harkonen are masterful deceivers. If there's more nuanced drama, that only exists in two dune books (the sequel to dune and god emperor) but these are interesting characters who live in an extremely complex situation. But if you remove that complexity, they do look kinda boring.
I enjoyed it as a fan of the book. Better than that Lynch trainwreck and had more of a budget than the miniseries. Not bad on the whole, that fact that Cinemaphile seethes so much over it is icing on the cake.
>part 2 is where all cool things happen
It literally is not. All the character building and exposition happen in the first half of the book, as do the political intrigue and drama. Almost all the narrative tension is in there, almost none in the second half, which only works as a payoff to the first. A payoff to all the things Villenew skipped.
Great analogy
The desert never felt so cool, nobody was sweaty, dirty, everyone had perfect makeup, it really was a commercial.
I remember Villeneuve saying in an interview «we wanted to make you feel the heat of the desert, the sky is white, not blue, it’s not a postcard» fricking lies
the sky was blue in fury road, but at least we could feel the heat, sweat and dirt.
Arrakeen just looks like some fricking hotel in dubai
>I remember Villeneuve saying in an interview «we wanted to make you feel the heat of the desert, the sky is white, not blue, it’s not a postcard» fricking lies
they should have used cinnamon colors for the movie. They film is way too white.
It's literally written in the first book that Arrakis has a pale white, ill looking, almost unnatural atmosphere because of its star. Even the royal palace has yellow colored stained glass to make the natural light look a bit healthier. Frank literally calls it Pale and Silvery
the secret is that its necessary for space navigation. Melange, until the final pages of dune, is a geriatric spice. Highly valuable because it extends life.
>the characters are really well developed within the context in which they are placed >but uhh the characters are actually shit if you remove the context in which they are supposed to exist
Do you sad little cynics even grasp the level of mental gymnastics you are undertaking in your cringe attempts to shit on this movie? This thread is so sad.
Slightly better, if only because it somewhat competently ripped off the visual aesthetics from the original Bladerunner, whereas DUNC only looks like your average postapocalyptic science fiction, but less imaginative ans vibrant.
All of his “films” are bombarded with pseudo imitations of other directors: Prisoners is a blatant remake of David Fincher’s Zodiac. Enemy borrows elements from Alfonso Cuaron’s Prisoner of Azkaban, and Arrival, the biggest offender of all, plagiarizes the moody peril that comfortably resided in Christopher Nolan’s Insomnia. Don’t forget about Sicario either, which is a shamelessly nuanced attempt to hijack the cinematic language of Michael Bay’s Bad Boys 2.
Denis Villeneuve doesn’t contain a single original thought. Blade Runner 2049 was a culmination of hackery and evident of the intellectual dullness of his previous films. The man is simply a proficient illusionist. He knows who to surround himself with. For instance, he employs the likes of Roger Deakins to photograph his movies with IMDBlike sensibilities in order to hijack the approval of impressionable film buffs looking for the next piece of “cinema” to fawn over. Then he calls up Ryan Gosling, still enjoying the indie spoils of his Drive fame, in order to drown 2049 in arthouse approval.
A mix of Star Wars' naturalist aestherics and simplisic architecture with Mad Max's vast empty spaces and scale, with a lot of capeshit camerawork and choreography. Of course, he misses the point of all of those.
morons like OP whose only enjoyment in life is hating NY recent movies and calling them 'capeshit', mean while he pretends to like 1930s black & white and arthouse films because it makes him sound smart. Never mind how disinterested his family and friends (if he has any) seem when he talks about his superior taste
>Watch this with my family >Say it was boring and I didn't get it >3 of them agree >1 of them start saying I was supposed to read a book or watch a YouTube to get it
Wife? How do you write a movie and expect for people to do background research for your movie? I couldn't they just make it coherent?
It's totally spineless casting. Entirely driven by a trend chasing committee, hence why you have people like Zendaya, Florence Pugh, and now the guy who's playing Elvis in that new movie because they have some popularity and social media currency in CURRENT YEAR. It's pathetic, it's cowardly, it's contemptible. Even guys I like like Brolin is a total miscast.
>Entirely driven by a trend chasing committee, hence why you have people like Zendaya, Florence Pugh, and now the guy who's playing Elvis in that new movie because they have some popularity and social media currency in CURRENT YEAR.
This is how casting has always worked you homosexual
Kyle MacLachlan was a literal noname.
And Prochnow and von Sydow were not some meme overhyped social media stars, they were accomplished actors with over two decades of experience.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>were not some meme overhyped social media stars
Social media didn't exist back then, Black personbrains
2 years ago
Anonymous
Yes. Hence why shitters like Zendaya and Tomophy and Aquaman didn't exist.
2 years ago
Anonymous
I swear to God nuHollywood feels closed off the talented good looking but unconnected new blood. Like Pitt, Cruise, DiCaprio, and Depp all broke in because they were good looking and could act but all came from middling/poorgay families (to the best of my knowledge). It feels like nowadays you need a richdaddy to break - you have no shot even if amazing looking and capable of acting
2 years ago
Anonymous
>foreigner >junkie mother >grew up in foster homes >not even attractive >now starring in Marvel and DC movies
It still happens
This movie was great for me
As my first experience of the Dune universe, I loved the sci-fi concepts. Sci-fi has been done to death but somehow this movie's setting felt original and refreshing.
The story clearly has a lot of biblical inspirations, with the main character, Paul (biblical name) being seemingly the messiah, and going through the desert with his mother performing miracles etc.
Not sure why people say the characters are boring. Even though the main character is a Gary Stu, I find him quite compelling. There are really interesting characters like the psychic witch, the soldier who is friends with the main character, the cyborg. I like a lot of the characters and I am always interested to find out more about each of them.
The movie didn't seem slow to me, I liked the suspense and scale of it.
Not sure why there's an entire thread of people saying opinions that I find hard to believe someone would genuinely have.
Considering the shit you people consume from streaming sites, I'm surprised this movie isn't good enough for you. Maybe the main problem is these little netflix serieses have rendered your attention-span so short that you will always be bored unless the movie is 30 minutes long and has cheap shock value like a tiny man entering another man's penis
Virtually all the characters had their best elements from the book removed and the book sucked too. >halleck doesnt qoute shit or play baliset >lady jessica being suspected to be the traitor is sort of implied in a two minute scene instead of being a significant sub plot for the entire first act. >thufir hawat doesnt suspect jessica and create that aforementioned subplot. Or do anything for that matter. Doesnt even have blue eyes because the relationship between spice and mentats is appearently too complex for audiences >baron doesnt frick boys >no feyd ruatha at all >piter is a completely dickless nobody that the baron isnt intimidated by at all >everything between leto losing the crawler and getting killed is shafted so that we see none of the strain that arrakis puts on leto. >yueh is hardly in the film and the lack of internal monologue makes his betrayal come completely out of the blue
The characters are even less compelling than in the book and they were soulless robots already. The best scene was seeing the sardaukar on salus secundus and that was pointless and out of sequence.
You redditors certainly do love DUNC and Vile Neuf.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Who is Vile Neuf? But if you believe Reddit loves Dune, I see now why you people have to desperately make us reasons to dislike it. It must suck letting Reddit determine what you're allowed to like.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>you people
So now you openly admit that you don't belong here. Good. That's progress.
2 years ago
Anonymous
I've just witnessed a thread full of morons making shit up for the sake of being contrarian. Of course I'm not part of that.
I'm not from reddit though. This might be a scary concept for you but I'm not actually part of any hivemind, I make my own opinions.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>contrarian
Yes. You are indeed a redditor. Congrats.
herbert wrote pretty well. his language is enjoyable to read. when you remove that part from dune you remove the part that makes the entire thing function.
It did feel like a car commercial to me.
Name a single vehicle used in the film
that gay little dragonfly vehicle they stole outright from Jodorowsky that the filmmakers pointlessly tried to build tension with as they tried to start it 3 times like a knackered old morris marina.
Okay, where can I go and get one of those, then, anon?
This is like accusing starship troopers of stealing power armor as a concept from fallout. But I don't know why I expected your average film moron on Cinemaphile to know anything about books
The American Psycho weaponized autism is evidence of that, but some people have read the book and actually don’t have to ask stupid questions and it doesn’t go a mile over their heads
>misunderstanding soft scifi
Soft scifi in general isn't meant to be enjoyed by adults. It has zero substance and only focuses on character building rather than introducing complex and interesting sci-fi concepts or some unforgettable ending. These movies aren't bad, you just weren't meant to enjoy them.
Please jump off a bridge
>Denis Villeneuve
what did you expect? You get what you always get. Long movie because long movies make people think its good. Effort justification, meaning you make yourself think its good because you put time in it. One hour story, and two hours are filled with staring into nothing, walking and traveling.
good summary.
I'm almost certain that washed out colours make normies instinctively regard a movie as more serious. it's the only explanation for the style becoming so ubiquitous.
Has Villeneuve created the first anti-spectacle epic? A film on an epic scale with NOTHING worth looking at?
>washed out colours make normies instinctively regard a movie as more serious.
Video games were doing this for a few years to make themselves seem more realistic.
They did that shit with The Batman too. It could’ve been an otherwise decent movie, but they really were trying too hard to top TDK. So you got a bloated, boring movie that was way too long with characters spending lots of time just walking and staring slowly.
>“He was walking with an assistant, very slowly,” Villeneuve told the Wall Street Journal. “It was like seeing Jesus walking into a temple. Everybody became super silent, and there was a kind of sacred moment. Everyone was in awe. It was so beautiful and powerful—I was moved to tears."
Him on Leto in 2049.
>"She is an autonomous creative force. A cultural icon in the making. A person driven by pure inspiration, empathy, and respect for her craft, who uses authenticity as a new superpower"
Him on Zendaya.
>One hour story, and two hours are filled with staring into nothing, walking and traveling.
kind of like lord of the rings
>kind of like lord of the rings
without any of the soul
An ugly, drab mess of half a movie. Villeneuve is nothing without Roger Deakins
Boring, slow, drab, colorless, dusty, ugly. Yep its dune.
Filtered.
I enjoyed the original Dune movie but felt nothing when watching this one. Maybe it was my fault for being hyped and expecting more.
Is Lynch's Dune really good? No jokes or memes pls.
No, I'm a big Lynch and Dune fan as well. The only thing is that it's more accurate to the books, as in it doesn't cut out a bunch of scenes like the Villeneuve film but I still prefer the new one.
Yes. It's of course pretty bad for his standard, but it's still much better than contemporary popcorn blockbusters, even though the second half was completely butchered in editing.
I liked it. I had time to breathe and enjoy the characters. I thought only zoomers had adhd ? There's nothing wrong with a long ass movie.
I think it was pretty entertaining.
But then again, I'm not trying to make a controversial post for attention
Better in every way
/thread
the characters are so generic it hurts. The book can't be that bad. The setting is great, the story sounds good, but holy shit was anyone supposed to feel anything at all seeing a faction get annihilated that we knew nothing about? Like the Red Wedding where we don't know about the Starks or Lannisters.
>The book can't be that bad.
it's early YA ficion where Paul is a Marty Stu who gets to be emperor of the universe at 18 and have two women lusting after his boypenis. in the second book there is even a plot point where his actions lead to the off-screen deaths of tens of billions but the main emphasis is that we should feel sorry for him because it makes him feel sad. it's one of those books whose fans reveal their lack of critical thinking ability.
Filtered.
They are still mostly generic in the books (they are all superhumans) but when you strip of them the context, they look a bit too simple
paul is supposed to be a (possible) future messiah, duke is an extremely charismatic leader who makes everyone a devotee of him, jessica belongs to the most important religious organization of the universe whose members exist only to serve them and she breaks their code (or does she?), duncan and gurney are (for now) merely the greatest warriors of the universe, the harkonen are masterful deceivers. If there's more nuanced drama, that only exists in two dune books (the sequel to dune and god emperor) but these are interesting characters who live in an extremely complex situation. But if you remove that complexity, they do look kinda boring.
I enjoyed it as a fan of the book. Better than that Lynch trainwreck and had more of a budget than the miniseries. Not bad on the whole, that fact that Cinemaphile seethes so much over it is icing on the cake.
Kek.
Pathetic samegay
agreed. Dennis is pretentious but he clearly made an adaptation that's far above the bar set by previous attempts.
I think part 2 will make the first one even better the way it feels very incomplete now + part 2 is where all cool things happen
>part 2 is where all cool things happen
It literally is not. All the character building and exposition happen in the first half of the book, as do the political intrigue and drama. Almost all the narrative tension is in there, almost none in the second half, which only works as a payoff to the first. A payoff to all the things Villenew skipped.
>Villlenueve continues to filter Cinemaphile
Based
DO IT AGAIN DENNY
>the monthly Cinemaphile spergs out about DUNC thread is back
see you morons in july and can't wait for DUNC 2
It was very nice to look at. Didn’t care at all about what was happening in the story. I don’t think anyone did.
>Dennis Villanueve
>Robert eggers
>ari aster
It must fricking suck being a zoomer movie fan when these are your generations most important directors
Yes i envy you boomers so fricking much you guys actually got good movies instead of capeshit or woke trash or BOTH
I really didn't care for It Begins Dunc
>A perfume commercial on steroids.
great line
Zimmer’s music was fricking cringe also
I can’t stand those wonder women wails
Dude is a hack, really, «we created instruments» bullshit, nothing sounded original
Great analogy
The desert never felt so cool, nobody was sweaty, dirty, everyone had perfect makeup, it really was a commercial.
I remember Villeneuve saying in an interview «we wanted to make you feel the heat of the desert, the sky is white, not blue, it’s not a postcard» fricking lies
the sky was blue in fury road, but at least we could feel the heat, sweat and dirt.
Arrakeen just looks like some fricking hotel in dubai
>I remember Villeneuve saying in an interview «we wanted to make you feel the heat of the desert, the sky is white, not blue, it’s not a postcard» fricking lies
they should have used cinnamon colors for the movie. They film is way too white.
It's literally written in the first book that Arrakis has a pale white, ill looking, almost unnatural atmosphere because of its star. Even the royal palace has yellow colored stained glass to make the natural light look a bit healthier. Frank literally calls it Pale and Silvery
I don't remember that tbh
movie was good. seethe
Why did they cut sex with Zendaya?
name one thing that Villanueva did wrong when adapting this inadaptable book
reveal the secret of spice
they never mention that spice comes from worms in part 1 since it gets reveled in the later half of Dune. So what does this post even mean
the secret is that its necessary for space navigation. Melange, until the final pages of dune, is a geriatric spice. Highly valuable because it extends life.
Literally everybody already knows that spice is used for space travel, there's no point pretending to hide it.
He made this movie
/thread
>the characters are really well developed within the context in which they are placed
>but uhh the characters are actually shit if you remove the context in which they are supposed to exist
Do you sad little cynics even grasp the level of mental gymnastics you are undertaking in your cringe attempts to shit on this movie? This thread is so sad.
what was bladerunner2? a bubblegum commercial?
is br2049 a better or worse movie than dune?
Slightly better, if only because it somewhat competently ripped off the visual aesthetics from the original Bladerunner, whereas DUNC only looks like your average postapocalyptic science fiction, but less imaginative ans vibrant.
It's the best movie ever made
Acting is just glorified modelling these days, it seems.
>A perfume commercial on steroids
I enjoyed the movie but I can't deny the accuracy of this
How was it alienating? Because black people?
Probably because the movie just tosses you into Dune's world without boring exposition to explain every detail
>X on [insert drugs]
Maybe the worse thing that media criticism has ever given us.
this, lynchsisters. so much this
>Alienating
What do you mean by that?
Denis The Dishonest claims another victim.
I have to ask, what did you expect?
All of his “films” are bombarded with pseudo imitations of other directors: Prisoners is a blatant remake of David Fincher’s Zodiac. Enemy borrows elements from Alfonso Cuaron’s Prisoner of Azkaban, and Arrival, the biggest offender of all, plagiarizes the moody peril that comfortably resided in Christopher Nolan’s Insomnia. Don’t forget about Sicario either, which is a shamelessly nuanced attempt to hijack the cinematic language of Michael Bay’s Bad Boys 2.
Denis Villeneuve doesn’t contain a single original thought. Blade Runner 2049 was a culmination of hackery and evident of the intellectual dullness of his previous films. The man is simply a proficient illusionist. He knows who to surround himself with. For instance, he employs the likes of Roger Deakins to photograph his movies with IMDBlike sensibilities in order to hijack the approval of impressionable film buffs looking for the next piece of “cinema” to fawn over. Then he calls up Ryan Gosling, still enjoying the indie spoils of his Drive fame, in order to drown 2049 in arthouse approval.
>Don’t forget about Sicario either, which is a shamelessly nuanced attempt to hijack the cinematic language of Michael Bay’s Bad Boys 2.
What does he immitates with dune? I really liked it and would probably like the "original".
A mix of Star Wars' naturalist aestherics and simplisic architecture with Mad Max's vast empty spaces and scale, with a lot of capeshit camerawork and choreography. Of course, he misses the point of all of those.
>Star Wars' naturalist aestherics
wut
Long establishing landscape shots, static cameras or horizontal pans. In particular, he films his desert like Lukas filmed Tatooine, but also Hoth.
>lots of sand
>naturalistic aesthetic
if you say so
It's about camerawork, moron. Go back to your youtube "film criticism".
my what?
Fricking kek I knew it was Reddit nail making these threads. Remember when people found out who you were and hid your Twitter account?
Take your meds
>Alienating, boring trash.
I disagree.
>A perfume commercial on steroids.
Kek
>Alienating,
And who was it supposed to alienate?
morons like OP whose only enjoyment in life is hating NY recent movies and calling them 'capeshit', mean while he pretends to like 1930s black & white and arthouse films because it makes him sound smart. Never mind how disinterested his family and friends (if he has any) seem when he talks about his superior taste
I don't think OP even knows what that word means. He's just using it as a generic derogatory adjective.
maybe the wooden acting wouldn't have been to bad if everything wasn't flat and grey
>Watch this with my family
>Say it was boring and I didn't get it
>3 of them agree
>1 of them start saying I was supposed to read a book or watch a YouTube to get it
Wife? How do you write a movie and expect for people to do background research for your movie? I couldn't they just make it coherent?
He should get back to his suspense movies like Prisoners, Enemy, Sicario.... same with Fincher. Anyways Fincher is more talented.
genuinely might be the worst cast i've ever seen in a film and i know almost nothing about the book
It's totally spineless casting. Entirely driven by a trend chasing committee, hence why you have people like Zendaya, Florence Pugh, and now the guy who's playing Elvis in that new movie because they have some popularity and social media currency in CURRENT YEAR. It's pathetic, it's cowardly, it's contemptible. Even guys I like like Brolin is a total miscast.
>Entirely driven by a trend chasing committee, hence why you have people like Zendaya, Florence Pugh, and now the guy who's playing Elvis in that new movie because they have some popularity and social media currency in CURRENT YEAR.
This is how casting has always worked you homosexual
This is not how casting worked for 1983 Dune.
>Jurgen Prochnow
>Max von Sydow
>fricking Sting
Kyle MacLachlan was a literal noname.
And Prochnow and von Sydow were not some meme overhyped social media stars, they were accomplished actors with over two decades of experience.
>were not some meme overhyped social media stars
Social media didn't exist back then, Black personbrains
Yes. Hence why shitters like Zendaya and Tomophy and Aquaman didn't exist.
I swear to God nuHollywood feels closed off the talented good looking but unconnected new blood. Like Pitt, Cruise, DiCaprio, and Depp all broke in because they were good looking and could act but all came from middling/poorgay families (to the best of my knowledge). It feels like nowadays you need a richdaddy to break - you have no shot even if amazing looking and capable of acting
>foreigner
>junkie mother
>grew up in foster homes
>not even attractive
>now starring in Marvel and DC movies
It still happens
It’s for Stan Twitter
Dune always sucked. Book is like catnip for psueds.
This movie was great for me
As my first experience of the Dune universe, I loved the sci-fi concepts. Sci-fi has been done to death but somehow this movie's setting felt original and refreshing.
The story clearly has a lot of biblical inspirations, with the main character, Paul (biblical name) being seemingly the messiah, and going through the desert with his mother performing miracles etc.
Not sure why people say the characters are boring. Even though the main character is a Gary Stu, I find him quite compelling. There are really interesting characters like the psychic witch, the soldier who is friends with the main character, the cyborg. I like a lot of the characters and I am always interested to find out more about each of them.
The movie didn't seem slow to me, I liked the suspense and scale of it.
Not sure why there's an entire thread of people saying opinions that I find hard to believe someone would genuinely have.
Considering the shit you people consume from streaming sites, I'm surprised this movie isn't good enough for you. Maybe the main problem is these little netflix serieses have rendered your attention-span so short that you will always be bored unless the movie is 30 minutes long and has cheap shock value like a tiny man entering another man's penis
Virtually all the characters had their best elements from the book removed and the book sucked too.
>halleck doesnt qoute shit or play baliset
>lady jessica being suspected to be the traitor is sort of implied in a two minute scene instead of being a significant sub plot for the entire first act.
>thufir hawat doesnt suspect jessica and create that aforementioned subplot. Or do anything for that matter. Doesnt even have blue eyes because the relationship between spice and mentats is appearently too complex for audiences
>baron doesnt frick boys
>no feyd ruatha at all
>piter is a completely dickless nobody that the baron isnt intimidated by at all
>everything between leto losing the crawler and getting killed is shafted so that we see none of the strain that arrakis puts on leto.
>yueh is hardly in the film and the lack of internal monologue makes his betrayal come completely out of the blue
The characters are even less compelling than in the book and they were soulless robots already. The best scene was seeing the sardaukar on salus secundus and that was pointless and out of sequence.
>the cyborg
what the frick are you talking about?
Someone post the Lynch-box please. I need a good laugh.
Cope, seethe and dilate
Why do the checkmarks stop so suddenly? What happened?
It looked terrible from the first trailer. Yeezy season 5 music video tier combined with terrible new-age starwars over produced throw away cgi
>new-age starwars
Say about Disney SW what you will, but they do easily look way better than DUNC.
how can you say this
is this board insane??
This is not /r/eddit, anon.
yeah, reddit hates star wars...
is this the opposite day thread or something?
You redditors certainly do love DUNC and Vile Neuf.
Who is Vile Neuf? But if you believe Reddit loves Dune, I see now why you people have to desperately make us reasons to dislike it. It must suck letting Reddit determine what you're allowed to like.
>you people
So now you openly admit that you don't belong here. Good. That's progress.
I've just witnessed a thread full of morons making shit up for the sake of being contrarian. Of course I'm not part of that.
I'm not from reddit though. This might be a scary concept for you but I'm not actually part of any hivemind, I make my own opinions.
>contrarian
Yes. You are indeed a redditor. Congrats.
countless hate threads on the board filled with the worst taste in film have convinced me that this film is excellent
This is what contrarians claim is "sovl".
The disc of DUNC is already marked down to $14.
THE 4K VERSION
What a shitshow.
One word: stupid.
herbert wrote pretty well. his language is enjoyable to read. when you remove that part from dune you remove the part that makes the entire thing function.
It wasn't a whole movie