They look all fleshy in these pictures, I imagined them more mechanical and colorful when I read Ezekiel as a kid, like I thought the "eyes" were like orbs and mechanical.
Historically speaking yes, Angels are terrifying and almost incomprehensible to the human eye. You'll see their light and their purity though, and even lucifer cannot mimick it. That's how you can differentiate a demon or an extra dimensional creature from an angel.
Satan is in the bible
and believing only in scripture is heresy as well, be careful
Satan and Christ are evenly matched and equal power. I saw an angel and it could hardly make contact before being swallowed by the sea of sin and all it could impart upon me was how surrounded by evil we were before disappearing.
False
The gyroscope drawings are cringe. Ophanim is linked. They're interlocking golden wheels. It's a chain, not a gyroscope.
Is this the thing John sees at the beginning of Revelation?
Ezekiel sees them in his vision
they are the wheels of the divine chariot
"A house divided upon itself will surely fall" so says the Lord thy God. Any shift from the balance of power would simply lead to one side destroying the other completely. Without contrast there can be no good or evil.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Also false
Angels are lower than God
Jesus Christ is God
therefor Satan is beneath him
your logic is also flawed
a spirit cannot be destroyed, it would go against God's infinite justice to do so
2 years ago
Anonymous
A house divided upon itself will surely fall, so says the Lord thy God. Do not argue the word of God.
2 years ago
Anonymous
I don't need to argue with what you are saying, it is eisegesis and thus inherently wrong
2 years ago
Anonymous
A house divided upon itself will surly fall so says the Lord thy God. Cease your blasphemous contradictions.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Argument by assertion, fallacy
2 years ago
Anonymous
A house divided upon itself shall surely fall so says the Lord thy God.
2 years ago
Anonymous
I never said that
2 years ago
Anonymous
Keep on crying and screaming, you'll never be right.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>a spirit cannot be destroyed
I have a little friend called Colt and I want you to meet him.
2 years ago
Anonymous
I remember being a kid and being hype for a new episode of Supernatural every Monday
He's right thought there's no "Lucifer" in the bible, it's just a reference to how Judah rejected Jesus, Satan appears in the book of Job but he is still talking with God, so he can't have "fallen", so yeah Lucy is a catholic church OC.
Lucifer and Satan are the same, >O Lucifer. O day-star. All this, according to the letter, is spoken of the king of Babylon. It may also be applied, in a spiritual sense, to Lucifer, the prince of devils, who was created a bright angel, but fell by pride and rebellion against God. (Challoner) (Luke x. 18.) (Calmet) --- He fell by pride, as Nabuchodonosor did. (Worthington) --- Homer (Iliad xix.) represents the demon of discord hurled down by Jupiter to the miserable region of mortals.
Why are you quoting everything except the books themselves? Satan in the book of job he's in heaven talking with God, while "Lucifer" supposedly betrayed God and was cast out of heaven, how can they even be the same character? There's no big bad in the bible, the moral of the story is that evil comes from within man, but a medieval peasant couldn't really understand this type of thing so the church made up "Lucifer" to scare the peasants into accepting it.
2 years ago
Anonymous
I am quoting people who are educated and qualified to analyze scripture, among whom you are not.
Satan and Lucifer are the same person
Satan is evil.
Are your beliefs at variance with this?
the fall is described in revelation following the ascension, Christ dying and resurrecting is Him snatching the keys of death and hell from the cohorts of the adversary, it's why there are provably evil people serving satan, they still think when they die satan and his ilk will be in charge down there, they think they'll find leniency from them like how it was before
>Lucifer is fanfiction
The absolute state of protestants. As expected from a soulless husk of a faith that takes the Bible at surface level. This is no better than following the Torah. Let go of this nonsense before it's too late.
Satan and Christ are evenly matched and equal power. I saw an angel and it could hardly make contact before being swallowed by the sea of sin and all it could impart upon me was how surrounded by evil we were before disappearing.
in the vision the gyroscopes are at the bottom of the structure and the function they're chronicled to be serving is moving the structure in all directions without needing to turn
gyroscope makes sense, your pic related doesn't
Satan is in the bible
and believing only in scripture is heresy as well, be careful
[...]
False
[...]
[...]
Ezekiel sees them in his vision
they are the wheels of the divine chariot
No, these are not accurate depictions.
Angels probably don't have wings at all.
I think these descriptions in the Bible should not be interpreted literally.
I think I read somewhere that back then, when people (like Ezekiel) used to see something hardly describable, they would focus on their own feelings.
As if they characterized Angels based on their subjective feeling towards the Angels' behavior,
e.g. if they felt that the Angel's eyesight was piercing them, they would describe it by writing about the Angel as if he had a thousand eyes.
Imagine how would Ezekiel would describe the Large Hadron Collider from CERN.
Ezekiel's description of the angels includes both literal descriptions of what he was seeing as well as subjective descriptions which involved use of simile.
So your post doesn't make sense.
But that's how it is. Same with numbers. Some numbers cannot be taken literally (see e.g. biblestudy[dot]o r g[slash]bibleref[slash]meaning-of-numbers-in-bible[slash]0[dot]h t m l).
Some things are literal, some are not. That's how people communicated back then, whether you like it or not.
>"Anything I don't like is allegory". >"The parts I do like? Those are entirely literal".
I don't know where you get that idea from
Know this among this swill of blasphemy that a house divided upon itself will surly fall, so says the Lord thy God. Carry with you the truth of the lord wherever he meets you and never doubt those truths you feel inside your soul.
Imagine being a smug reddit atheist who's disdained the bible his entire life, never reads any literature and just watches anime all day, and then becoming autistically obsessed with some obscure bible passage because it has MUH LOVECRAFTIAN ELEMENTS
Imagine being so obsessed with a book about magic sky fairies to the point that you use it to justify your oppression of LGBTQ people. have a nice day you tradlarping chud.
>biblically accurate angels >mature anime >lost media >unconventional christmas movies >uncanny valley >liminal spaces >strangely familiar places >junji ito >akira >neon evangilion >serial experiment lain >so bad its good >the pope exists in the car universe >prequel memes >gaslighting >Cinemaphilecore >trust the science >just let people enjoy things >sus >techwear >creed aventus >based >who would win walter white or tony soprano >pirating indie games is immoral >its fun with friends >its a good X game but it falls flat as a Y game >japanese movie posters >this scene of Vito from The Sopranos kind of looks like Star Wars! >Cinemaphile is a bad board >copium >racism outside /b/ not allowed >christianity/mormonism/scientology is just like a cult >lofi hip hop >plastic love >captain america lifting thor's hammer >john lennon was a wife beater >nobody: >who hurt you >I don't really care about politics, it makes me unhappy >misinformation spreads quicker than real information >Penguinz0 >frankenstein is the scientist not the monster >y'all >reporting soijak spammers isnt reddit >Ed Edd n Eddy took place in purgatory >gaslighting
You are now realize that the Bible was specifically written in such way that it would have morons arguing about the depictions of utter nonsense for thousands of years.
>Angels
FRICKING SHOW ME ONE
You have better chances to find Pope's shit in the woods.
>art/video of an "biblically accurate angel" >it's not a biblically accurate angel at all and instead it's just some shitty obnoxious "le creepy" design with over the top eyes and fleshy texture
redditors ruin everything
If anyone here is genuinely interested in the subject A Dark Song is the best movie I know depicting a john dee esque angel summoning ritual. An it has actual accurate angels not just the cherubim and shit.
We don't look anything like that.
That's right, we are BLAKK
No, ANGELS.
Not one of the animals on Noah's ark.
This guy again. You literally have to be the OP making this same thread just so you can do this
Yes.
Hnnnng
When I first saw this I fell in love and got rrrreally worried. Then I learned that it truly was female and was SO fricking relieved.
Constantine is a blessed movie.
They look all fleshy in these pictures, I imagined them more mechanical and colorful when I read Ezekiel as a kid, like I thought the "eyes" were like orbs and mechanical.
The “eyes” are metaphors for stars. He’s describing constellations. Biblically accurate angels is reddit tier nonsense.
As if “muh bible is actually le metaphor” isn’t even more reddit midwit nonsense.
Historically speaking yes, Angels are terrifying and almost incomprehensible to the human eye. You'll see their light and their purity though, and even lucifer cannot mimick it. That's how you can differentiate a demon or an extra dimensional creature from an angel.
>lucifer
Bible only please, not your fanfiction OCs.
Satan is in the bible
and believing only in scripture is heresy as well, be careful
False
Ezekiel sees them in his vision
they are the wheels of the divine chariot
>false
Well I'm a prophet of the Lord God I really advise you to not go against me when I am acting on behalf of your God.
False
"A house divided upon itself will surely fall" so says the Lord thy God. Any shift from the balance of power would simply lead to one side destroying the other completely. Without contrast there can be no good or evil.
Also false
Angels are lower than God
Jesus Christ is God
therefor Satan is beneath him
your logic is also flawed
a spirit cannot be destroyed, it would go against God's infinite justice to do so
A house divided upon itself will surely fall, so says the Lord thy God. Do not argue the word of God.
I don't need to argue with what you are saying, it is eisegesis and thus inherently wrong
A house divided upon itself will surly fall so says the Lord thy God. Cease your blasphemous contradictions.
Argument by assertion, fallacy
A house divided upon itself shall surely fall so says the Lord thy God.
I never said that
Keep on crying and screaming, you'll never be right.
>a spirit cannot be destroyed
I have a little friend called Colt and I want you to meet him.
I remember being a kid and being hype for a new episode of Supernatural every Monday
Galatians 1:8, you stupid Black person.
I don't care what the Galatians said because I am telling you what God says right now.
He's right thought there's no "Lucifer" in the bible, it's just a reference to how Judah rejected Jesus, Satan appears in the book of Job but he is still talking with God, so he can't have "fallen", so yeah Lucy is a catholic church OC.
Lucifer and Satan are the same,
>O Lucifer. O day-star. All this, according to the letter, is spoken of the king of Babylon. It may also be applied, in a spiritual sense, to Lucifer, the prince of devils, who was created a bright angel, but fell by pride and rebellion against God. (Challoner) (Luke x. 18.) (Calmet) --- He fell by pride, as Nabuchodonosor did. (Worthington) --- Homer (Iliad xix.) represents the demon of discord hurled down by Jupiter to the miserable region of mortals.
Why are you quoting everything except the books themselves? Satan in the book of job he's in heaven talking with God, while "Lucifer" supposedly betrayed God and was cast out of heaven, how can they even be the same character? There's no big bad in the bible, the moral of the story is that evil comes from within man, but a medieval peasant couldn't really understand this type of thing so the church made up "Lucifer" to scare the peasants into accepting it.
I am quoting people who are educated and qualified to analyze scripture, among whom you are not.
Satan and Lucifer are the same person
Satan is evil.
Are your beliefs at variance with this?
the fall is described in revelation following the ascension, Christ dying and resurrecting is Him snatching the keys of death and hell from the cohorts of the adversary, it's why there are provably evil people serving satan, they still think when they die satan and his ilk will be in charge down there, they think they'll find leniency from them like how it was before
>Lucifer is fanfiction
The absolute state of protestants. As expected from a soulless husk of a faith that takes the Bible at surface level. This is no better than following the Torah. Let go of this nonsense before it's too late.
Satan and Christ are evenly matched and equal power. I saw an angel and it could hardly make contact before being swallowed by the sea of sin and all it could impart upon me was how surrounded by evil we were before disappearing.
did you take a picture?
>Satan and Christ are evenly matched and equal power
Absolute blasphemy read the Bible
Christ is as powerful as you allow him to be in your life
It's a sin to make any image of things from heaven. Stop now.
The gyroscope drawings are cringe. Ophanim is linked. They're interlocking golden wheels. It's a chain, not a gyroscope.
Is this the thing John sees at the beginning of Revelation?
Ezekiel
in the vision the gyroscopes are at the bottom of the structure and the function they're chronicled to be serving is moving the structure in all directions without needing to turn
gyroscope makes sense, your pic related doesn't
No, these are not accurate depictions.
Angels probably don't have wings at all.
I think these descriptions in the Bible should not be interpreted literally.
I think I read somewhere that back then, when people (like Ezekiel) used to see something hardly describable, they would focus on their own feelings.
As if they characterized Angels based on their subjective feeling towards the Angels' behavior,
e.g. if they felt that the Angel's eyesight was piercing them, they would describe it by writing about the Angel as if he had a thousand eyes.
Imagine how would Ezekiel would describe the Large Hadron Collider from CERN.
>Hmm, these metal tunnels sure stretch on for a long time
Like that
>metal
What are you talking about Jacob
Ezekiel's description of the angels includes both literal descriptions of what he was seeing as well as subjective descriptions which involved use of simile.
So your post doesn't make sense.
Typical apologetic nonsense.
>"Anything I don't like is allegory".
>"The parts I do like? Those are entirely literal".
But that's how it is. Same with numbers. Some numbers cannot be taken literally (see e.g. biblestudy[dot]o r g[slash]bibleref[slash]meaning-of-numbers-in-bible[slash]0[dot]h t m l).
Some things are literal, some are not. That's how people communicated back then, whether you like it or not.
>"Anything I don't like is allegory".
>"The parts I do like? Those are entirely literal".
I don't know where you get that idea from
>>"Anything I don't like is allegory".
>>"The parts I do like? Those are entirely literal".
You are projecting. For you it's more like
>>"Everything is made up"
>>"... but the things which show Catholics in a bad light are literal and real"
The famous: "I'm rubber and you're glue" argument. The only that can defeat the anti-Catholic conspiracy.
>Typical apologetic nonsense.
Oh wow, that was a great argument.
>"Anything I don't like is allegory".
>"The parts I do like? Those are entirely literal".
And that's 'ad personam' bullshit.
Are you brain dead?
Your retort was ad personam.
>oh the bible is supposed to be entrely literal? So when it says the Eucharist is Christ's Blood and Body that's literal?
>*insert protestant cope*
>>"Anything I don't like is allegory".
>>"The parts I do like? Those are entirely literal".
yes
>It was as if I were gazing into very rectum of Satan himself.
Don’t mind me, just waiting for the pasta
the traditional image of an angel is more appealing
>le heckin' biblically accurate angels
God (in the abrahamic sense) is not real.
Don't follow the bible cult blindly, anons
The ninth circle of Hell awaits you, israelite. The Lord condemns those who do not see His light. Your day of judgement is coming.
cope
The israelites and muslims are just as wrong
LUMINOUS BODIES
There an entire ongoing series
>ongoing
it is ongoing
It's a literal bootleg made by a grifter and a bunch of sweatshop assistants.
It's had three chapters in the past two months, anon
The are continuing it.
The work continues without Miura, cuck
Know this among this swill of blasphemy that a house divided upon itself will surly fall, so says the Lord thy God. Carry with you the truth of the lord wherever he meets you and never doubt those truths you feel inside your soul.
>he couldn't win an argument so he appeals to the five solae as if that doesn't make him more wrong
Imagine being a smug reddit atheist who's disdained the bible his entire life, never reads any literature and just watches anime all day, and then becoming autistically obsessed with some obscure bible passage because it has MUH LOVECRAFTIAN ELEMENTS
Imagine being this mad for being confronted with the fact that angels arent le pretty floating white people
Imagine being so obsessed with a book about magic sky fairies to the point that you use it to justify your oppression of LGBTQ people. have a nice day you tradlarping chud.
>justify your oppression of LGBTQ people
id tell you to kys but youll do it yourself anyway troony
>m-muh DARKIES AND REPRESENTATION. ITS 2022 WE NEED BLACK ELVES
I hope you sjw homosexuals in a fire.
You raging spergs
>redditcally accurate angels
What are some kinos about demons living amongst us?
>vast majority of angelic ranks in the bible are described as "human with wings"
>the minority are the ones called "biblically accurate"
why?
they never read the book + white people make them seethe
evangelion
for me, its scientifically accurate parasites
Bane?
moses 1995
not angels but there is a cool scene where moses ask god to show himself to his people
>biblically accurate angels
>biblically accurate angels
>mature anime
>lost media
>unconventional christmas movies
>uncanny valley
>liminal spaces
>strangely familiar places
>junji ito
>akira
>neon evangilion
>serial experiment lain
>so bad its good
>the pope exists in the car universe
>prequel memes
>gaslighting
>Cinemaphilecore
>trust the science
>just let people enjoy things
>sus
>techwear
>creed aventus
>based
>who would win walter white or tony soprano
>pirating indie games is immoral
>its fun with friends
>its a good X game but it falls flat as a Y game
>japanese movie posters
>this scene of Vito from The Sopranos kind of looks like Star Wars!
>Cinemaphile is a bad board
>copium
>racism outside /b/ not allowed
>christianity/mormonism/scientology is just like a cult
>lofi hip hop
>plastic love
>captain america lifting thor's hammer
>john lennon was a wife beater
>nobody:
>who hurt you
>I don't really care about politics, it makes me unhappy
>misinformation spreads quicker than real information
>Penguinz0
>frankenstein is the scientist not the monster
>y'all
>reporting soijak spammers isnt reddit
>Ed Edd n Eddy took place in purgatory
>gaslighting
>unconventional christmas movies
Is this a new thing?
Something like this?
nah that's you
seethe he a river, moron
>spooky eyes meme
Stale meme
Harvey, 1950 w jimmy stewart
You are now realize that the Bible was specifically written in such way that it would have morons arguing about the depictions of utter nonsense for thousands of years.
>Angels
FRICKING SHOW ME ONE
You have better chances to find Pope's shit in the woods.
It's called DMT.
>art/video of an "biblically accurate angel"
>it's not a biblically accurate angel at all and instead it's just some shitty obnoxious "le creepy" design with over the top eyes and fleshy texture
redditors ruin everything
It's just a Bayonetta rip off by hacks.
>/film/
>uwu
>MPV
>Star Wars
>jazz
>shared ride
>midwit
>Christina Hendricks
>Epic Rap Battles of History
>stand-up comedy
>dental floss
>ganja
>ASMR
>bro
>.io
>veggies
>he monke
>Saturday Night Live
>The charges, Officer
>Pawn Stars
>cursed images
>Storage Wars
>fun fact
>PUTA
>classic Paul Dano
>fact check
>Marvel Cinematic Universe
>Eurovision
>musical
>Enbie
>wasted years
>oof
>in the middle of the pandemic
>vlog
>INTJ
>Call an ambulance, but not for me!
>Manic Pixie Dream Girl
>creepypasta
an interpretation from movie NOAH
If anyone here is genuinely interested in the subject A Dark Song is the best movie I know depicting a john dee esque angel summoning ritual. An it has actual accurate angels not just the cherubim and shit.