no, nothing he does is really good, hes very annoying and is constantly fake screaming and shit like that.
that being said, i actually think hes a good guy irl tho.
oh i don't know probably because it actively destroyed kenobi's character, bottom of the barrel writing, laughable sequences like leia chase scene, trench coat hiding leia thing, was a blatant cash grab that presented absolutely nothing worthwhile other than le epic lightsaber fights that are somehow worse than the sequel trilogy fights, introduced the confusing and pointless character of reva that they wanted us to feel bad for even though she did nothing to redeem herself etc etc
I don't get it, there is no school that one needs to attend to become a """reviewer""" so why does anyone take these "people" seriously? Is this really all Ebert's fault?
Most youtube movie review/analysis stuff is just to have something on in the background while working on something else, don't think most really take it all that serious
Whats his name again?
Seven Dollar Sanchez
Ragin Rodriguez
angry anus analyzer
hostile hernando
Nagging Sanchez
Mad Miguel
it's just normal people talking about a movie
Why does he have the emotional and mental maturity of a 15-year-old? His old reviews don't hold up.
>name is Angry Joe
>usually acts like an angry moron in his reviews
That was his thing, its why he became famous. So its basically just his gimmick and that's why he does it.
he mostly isnt angry. he has apleb tier taste giving utter shit 10/10
His reactions are an act but he does bave the mind of a 13 years old, he thinks capeshit is the height of cinema
For the most part his reviews are pretty good. The skits can be cringe as frick, but I usually agree with his actual reviews.
no, nothing he does is really good, hes very annoying and is constantly fake screaming and shit like that.
that being said, i actually think hes a good guy irl tho.
He was decent. His friends have better taste and are more critical.
As a group it definitely works. It's good to see them not being unanimous all the time.
the tall guy usually has the worst takes.
always thought thats joes brother.
his wife is hot af too.
To me it seems like he probably just reads some article/reddit thread to get his main takes
really. I thought he was ok.
Does he even review games anymore? Do they even make games still?
>Loved Mandalorian
>Hated Kenobi
?
this makes perfect sense. what's so confusing?
>loves one shitty di$ney corporate product
>hates similar shitty di$ney corporate product
Gee I wonder why he’s a hypocrite?
oh i don't know probably because it actively destroyed kenobi's character, bottom of the barrel writing, laughable sequences like leia chase scene, trench coat hiding leia thing, was a blatant cash grab that presented absolutely nothing worthwhile other than le epic lightsaber fights that are somehow worse than the sequel trilogy fights, introduced the confusing and pointless character of reva that they wanted us to feel bad for even though she did nothing to redeem herself etc etc
actual bait
Mandalorian is also boring, nonsensical, 10 year tier and spins its wheels.
normie taste and normie opinions. Literally an average joe. Just slightly more critical than most though.
I don't get it, there is no school that one needs to attend to become a """reviewer""" so why does anyone take these "people" seriously? Is this really all Ebert's fault?
Most youtube movie review/analysis stuff is just to have something on in the background while working on something else, don't think most really take it all that serious
Peeved Pedro
doesnt seem likely, clicked on his the boys s3 review and said he liked it