i dont even know what oled means or how tvs work like the phyusics of photons making colors and the light hitting your eyes or like the electonics of the oled normal tv vs led light like the really briught light on cars siomtimes
My brother in law has it, I can't describe it but the animal documantaries look absolutely kino, everything else look so fucking artificial its awful. Overexposed and over saturated, like the gamma on my shitty monitor turned to 1000%, also it has this built in frame upscaling I think, because all the movies look like they were recorded on gopro
The picture is oddly perfect. Like, no projector in any cinema will ever match that contrast. This is good in ways but also almost off for some films. They weren't intended to be that sharp. It helps with modern digital trash that's shot lazily, and of course it's better than cheap led tvs at showing them. It's miles better.
It's still very noticeable compared to top led tvs, but the top led tvs are still very watchable for cinema when they have good local dimming (top usually do).
However why I sold my oled tv is motion. The motion makes my eyes want to vomit into my mouth. The soap opera effect happens everywhere. There are other effects without names, but they make motion choppy, then smooth, then fast, it's all over the place. I'm of the Quentin Tarantino school that film is 24 fps, it is a dreamlike cadence that does not perfectly mimic real life motion, but represents reality in a dramatic way. Same as lighting and dialogue shouldn't reflect reality perfectly, but theatrically heighten it.
My current tv is a cheapo Samsung led because of, partly price, but also motion. It actually has slow enough processors to give more of a 24 fps look than any other tvs I've tested, regardless the source. My ideal tv them would be contrast at the highest end of led tvs, good lit room performance like an led, and slower deliberate processing like on cheap tvs to preserve filmic cadence and motion. Would it suffer for games and sports tv? Yes, but idgaf.
Apparently some old plasmas have this going on, like the old Panasonic kuro. But they are small, dim, expensive, aging, and by this point almost unobtanium. The best kept ones will die soon, and they are never to be manufactured again.
I forgot about short throws. They are interesting, they are essentially a tv form factor because they don't need set back. I'd have to see their motion and contrast in person to tell. I also love their ability to go big. If I bought another tv it would be 75 inch because widescreen movies are pitifully small on my 55. I want the damn theater experience.
Sounds like an issue with the settings more than the tv hardware. Every one of these new tvs I run into has their settings set to all sorts of retarded shit.
I don't know if the one that boosts fps with fake frames or the one for "sharpness" is the one I despise most, but doing things like running contrast, brightness, saturation, etc. at 100% is also common.
They get mogged by entry level short throw 4k laser projectors for the same money and you get a vastly bigger screen
Gross
As someone with a projector, projectors are mostly a meme. Those OLED televisions LG pumps out every year, C whatever and its siblings, mog the shit out of any projector+screen combo you can get for the same price.
But for a proper room designed for a projector and with a massive space ready to be projected on, sure, a projector is nice.
The picture is oddly perfect. Like, no projector in any cinema will ever match that contrast. This is good in ways but also almost off for some films. They weren't intended to be that sharp. It helps with modern digital trash that's shot lazily, and of course it's better than cheap led tvs at showing them. It's miles better.
It's still very noticeable compared to top led tvs, but the top led tvs are still very watchable for cinema when they have good local dimming (top usually do).
However why I sold my oled tv is motion. The motion makes my eyes want to vomit into my mouth. The soap opera effect happens everywhere. There are other effects without names, but they make motion choppy, then smooth, then fast, it's all over the place. I'm of the Quentin Tarantino school that film is 24 fps, it is a dreamlike cadence that does not perfectly mimic real life motion, but represents reality in a dramatic way. Same as lighting and dialogue shouldn't reflect reality perfectly, but theatrically heighten it.
My current tv is a cheapo Samsung led because of, partly price, but also motion. It actually has slow enough processors to give more of a 24 fps look than any other tvs I've tested, regardless the source. My ideal tv them would be contrast at the highest end of led tvs, good lit room performance like an led, and slower deliberate processing like on cheap tvs to preserve filmic cadence and motion. Would it suffer for games and sports tv? Yes, but idgaf.
Apparently some old plasmas have this going on, like the old Panasonic kuro. But they are small, dim, expensive, aging, and by this point almost unobtanium. The best kept ones will die soon, and they are never to be manufactured again.
I played with every setting imaginable. Still shit.
What you're talking about with 24p has nothing to do with OLED. Every sample and hold tech handles it the same way and is more dependent on the TVs processing than anything.
Plasma can handle 24p better if you don't want any judder reduction whatsoever but I find 24p judder just as distracting as over processing creating the soap opera effect. There's a happy medium.
It has everything to do with the oled. You are retarded.
What you're talking about with 24p has nothing to do with OLED. Every sample and hold tech handles it the same way and is more dependent on the TVs processing than anything.
Plasma can handle 24p better if you don't want any judder reduction whatsoever but I find 24p judder just as distracting as over processing creating the soap opera effect. There's a happy medium.
I played with every setting imaginable. Still shit.
[...]
It has everything to do with the oled. You are retarded.
[...]
Brown hands typed this.
were you using it as a monitor or something, i turned off all motion smoothing by setting my refresh rate to 24hz in windows then going through the clarity settings
Depends on what you're watching. For high res sports, it's fucking fantastic. Movies/tv are gonna be very reliant on how they were shot, and where in the transfer process your copy comes from. Entirely possible everything you watch will look like shit.
I have a Samsung QD OLED and its way better than any of the LG offerings. Literal night and day difference. Don't fall for the LG shills, the colors are dull as fuck, White Oled sucks compared to QD.
don't be afraid to buy samsung, Sony is considered the best and they use the same panel
if you play on an xbox or playstation or just watch movies burn in is a complete non issue. "gaming features" like what? It has HDR10, VRR, different modes for different game genres.
Skill issue if you're some incel sitting at a PC home screen or shitposting all day.
>if you play on an xbox or playstation or just watch movies burn in is a complete non issue.
absolutely not true, there are tons of reviews from people who use their QD-OLED only for gaing and get burn-in after a month > "gaming features" like what?
only has 60hz BFI
No just get a good computer and top of the line monitor and speakers for the same price as 1 TV.
I'm an incel btw
if you watch or play a ton of HDR content or play competitive multiplayer then yes, otherwise no
especially no if you want to use it as a monitor
top of the line OLED monitors cost more than OLED tvs you retarded zoomer
>bloom central
fuck no
i dont even know what oled means or how tvs work like the phyusics of photons making colors and the light hitting your eyes or like the electonics of the oled normal tv vs led light like the really briught light on cars siomtimes
yes, if you like watching movies and have the room for it
Yeah, I've seen the reviews for the new lineup for this year and they are fucking insane.
whats the new lineup?
Yeah
My brother in law has it, I can't describe it but the animal documantaries look absolutely kino, everything else look so fucking artificial its awful. Overexposed and over saturated, like the gamma on my shitty monitor turned to 1000%, also it has this built in frame upscaling I think, because all the movies look like they were recorded on gopro
just turn it off in the settings
They get mogged by entry level short throw 4k laser projectors for the same money and you get a vastly bigger screen
Gross
who wants a projector though?
I forgot about short throws. They are interesting, they are essentially a tv form factor because they don't need set back. I'd have to see their motion and contrast in person to tell. I also love their ability to go big. If I bought another tv it would be 75 inch because widescreen movies are pitifully small on my 55. I want the damn theater experience.
>that opinion from the anus
now say sorry to everyone
Sounds like an issue with the settings more than the tv hardware. Every one of these new tvs I run into has their settings set to all sorts of retarded shit.
I don't know if the one that boosts fps with fake frames or the one for "sharpness" is the one I despise most, but doing things like running contrast, brightness, saturation, etc. at 100% is also common.
As someone with a projector, projectors are mostly a meme. Those OLED televisions LG pumps out every year, C whatever and its siblings, mog the shit out of any projector+screen combo you can get for the same price.
But for a proper room designed for a projector and with a massive space ready to be projected on, sure, a projector is nice.
Just google it retard, your blacked porn will be burned on screen.
Yep. Only poorfags will disagree with their copium.
Cathode-ray tube is better but nobody builds them anymore, so OLED is second best
c1 owner here. yes.
is QD OLED better than regular OLED?
The picture is oddly perfect. Like, no projector in any cinema will ever match that contrast. This is good in ways but also almost off for some films. They weren't intended to be that sharp. It helps with modern digital trash that's shot lazily, and of course it's better than cheap led tvs at showing them. It's miles better.
It's still very noticeable compared to top led tvs, but the top led tvs are still very watchable for cinema when they have good local dimming (top usually do).
However why I sold my oled tv is motion. The motion makes my eyes want to vomit into my mouth. The soap opera effect happens everywhere. There are other effects without names, but they make motion choppy, then smooth, then fast, it's all over the place. I'm of the Quentin Tarantino school that film is 24 fps, it is a dreamlike cadence that does not perfectly mimic real life motion, but represents reality in a dramatic way. Same as lighting and dialogue shouldn't reflect reality perfectly, but theatrically heighten it.
My current tv is a cheapo Samsung led because of, partly price, but also motion. It actually has slow enough processors to give more of a 24 fps look than any other tvs I've tested, regardless the source. My ideal tv them would be contrast at the highest end of led tvs, good lit room performance like an led, and slower deliberate processing like on cheap tvs to preserve filmic cadence and motion. Would it suffer for games and sports tv? Yes, but idgaf.
Apparently some old plasmas have this going on, like the old Panasonic kuro. But they are small, dim, expensive, aging, and by this point almost unobtanium. The best kept ones will die soon, and they are never to be manufactured again.
>I sold my tv because I didn't know how to access the settings
ISHYGDDT
I played with every setting imaginable. Still shit.
It has everything to do with the oled. You are retarded.
Brown hands typed this.
>I played with every setting imaginable. Still shit.
you're just grossly incompetent
What you're talking about with 24p has nothing to do with OLED. Every sample and hold tech handles it the same way and is more dependent on the TVs processing than anything.
Plasma can handle 24p better if you don't want any judder reduction whatsoever but I find 24p judder just as distracting as over processing creating the soap opera effect. There's a happy medium.
>words
were you using it as a monitor or something, i turned off all motion smoothing by setting my refresh rate to 24hz in windows then going through the clarity settings
Enjoy your burn-in
Yes also all oleds burn in. It's the technology, you can't avoid shit motion or burn in.
Depends on what you're watching. For high res sports, it's fucking fantastic. Movies/tv are gonna be very reliant on how they were shot, and where in the transfer process your copy comes from. Entirely possible everything you watch will look like shit.
OLED screens are planned obsolescence that degrade over time.
I have a Samsung QD OLED and its way better than any of the LG offerings. Literal night and day difference. Don't fall for the LG shills, the colors are dull as fuck, White Oled sucks compared to QD.
don't be afraid to buy samsung, Sony is considered the best and they use the same panel
>even worse burn-in and worse gaming features
lol
if you play on an xbox or playstation or just watch movies burn in is a complete non issue. "gaming features" like what? It has HDR10, VRR, different modes for different game genres.
Skill issue if you're some incel sitting at a PC home screen or shitposting all day.
>if you play on an xbox or playstation or just watch movies burn in is a complete non issue.
absolutely not true, there are tons of reviews from people who use their QD-OLED only for gaing and get burn-in after a month
> "gaming features" like what?
only has 60hz BFI
cope, LG color is dogshit
LG reds are dogshit, everything else is fine
Samsungs has no Dolby Vision and their factory calibration is too vibrant and bright against mastering monitors.
t. saw a Lg shill youtube video and parrots that opinion . No one cares about dolby vision
>No one cares about dolby vision
People who actually watching kino do.
OLED TVs "do" look better - if you are watching a room with low ambient light, and you spend the money on a quality display like LG or Sony.
In a room with lots of ambient light, I think you're better off with an LED TV (like a Samsung Crystal LED, etc) and those will usually cost less too.
Looks like shit honestly