it'll be funny to watch you retards scream cry and shit yourself in response to something that is as bad as harry potter always was to everyone who didn't grow up on it
I didn't grow up with it and I think like half of the movies are solid. I really liked the 3rd one and the last one had some great moments
Of course people are going to pretend the most popular book series in the world was always shit so it doesn't matter the adaption sucks because the author said trannies are perverts or something
Will Gen alpha even give a shit about this? Who will this be for when it releases in 5+ years? Is it just going to be old millennials with sprinkles of old zoomers watching this show about an 11 year old boy going to school?
>Is it just going to be old millennials with sprinkles of old zoomers watching this show about an 11 year old boy going to school?
No, they'll be watching this show about an 11 year old GIRL going to school bigot
Of course it will be re written this is not even a HP thing it happened to Tolkien already. Writers today are shit and want to steal other peoples stories and put their little identity politics in where there was none before. Their method of separating from the author is by injecting their little soapbox instead of a cool alternate story.
I'm curious, where the hell do they believe there's any transphobia in the books themselves? You would think if it was in the books, Rowling's opinions on it wouldn't have come as such a shock to these lunatics.
>What is Rita Skeeta and Aunt Marge both clearly being intended as transwomen? >What is Voldemort being deadnamed constantly by Dumbledore?
Rita is portrayed as being exceedingly feminine in both dress and temperament though, and no way would the ever prim and proper Dursley's accept aunt Marge if she were anything other than that.
>Voldemort deadnamed
Voldemort isnt a tranny
'i am lord Voldemort'
'tom marvolo riddle'
its a name he gave himself when he was an edgy teen that stuck and became what people call him, that isnt the same as some dude deciding to be called Jessica
what utter fucking nonsense, like the rest of the tranny movement
no it's not the same, it involves someone changing their name so it looks similar but isn't, just a guy giving himself a nickname, like calling the fonz Arthur isnt dead naming him
I'm curious, where the hell do they believe there's any transphobia in the books themselves? You would think if it was in the books, Rowling's opinions on it wouldn't have come as such a shock to these lunatics.
But there's nothing transphobic in the books. There's nothing even about trannies to begin with. JK Rowling only became known by troons for her gender politics on twitter. It's got nothing to do with the books, so what is there to rewrite?
Trans and enby characters need to be included in the plot to offset Rowling's horrifying transphobia. And they need to be main characters as well, not just background ones.
I don't think rewriting one of the mentally strongest female characters (and a fan favorite) to be male is going to go over well with the idiots pushing for trans representation. They don't want their favorites to be changed, they want the ones they don't care about to be sacrificed on their unholy altar.
JK practically had her hand down her pants when writing Thatcher stand-in Umbridge, she's only considered evil and fascist now because of genderspecial shit and current year goblin discourse, because she was your standard bonglib prior
Rowling is a crusty old feminist who hates men. Harry Potter was always globalist neoliberal propaganda. Let the hags and troons duke it out. Not my problem.
It's so lame, because the game itself has a prominent trans character voiced by a tranny, so they did everything they could to kowtow to the insane mob, while the insane mob boycut their game.
there was no transphobia in Harry Potter, there's no evidence Rowling even knew what a trans person was prior to 2017-2018
and no, Rita Skeeter having "mannish hands" doesn't count as transhpobia
JK Rowling has the final say on everything. The only reason a tranny was in the video game is because she gave it the okay and made the creature humiliating and called “Sir-ona Ryan”
She won’t let them, she is a based tranny destroyer.
She will let them fill it with homosexuals and naggers though because she isn’t that based.
Literally nobody saw a strain of transphobia in Harry Potter while the primary audience of it was growing up and adored the books. Now the same people have grown up to be super woke trannies, and they are seething that the author of subject of their childhood admiration decided to double down on being reasonable after her woke episode.
it'll be funny to watch you retards scream cry and shit yourself in response to something that is as bad as harry potter always was to everyone who didn't grow up on it
>seething troon detected
>t. seething samefag chud
I didn't grow up with it and I think like half of the movies are solid. I really liked the 3rd one and the last one had some great moments
Of course people are going to pretend the most popular book series in the world was always shit so it doesn't matter the adaption sucks because the author said trannies are perverts or something
>You HAVE to like the goyslop
I preferred Septemus Heap sorry, Hairy Pooper was boring.
ywnbaw
our tranny in the bathroom meme will become real?
Will Gen alpha even give a shit about this? Who will this be for when it releases in 5+ years? Is it just going to be old millennials with sprinkles of old zoomers watching this show about an 11 year old boy going to school?
>Is it just going to be old millennials with sprinkles of old zoomers watching this show about an 11 year old boy going to school?
No, they'll be watching this show about an 11 year old GIRL going to school bigot
I hope so.
It's harry potter, by default any change will be good.
>Marix Lopez (she/him)
>(she/him)
I bet they're using a form fill for the pronoun part and forgot to remove one
Of course it will be re written this is not even a HP thing it happened to Tolkien already. Writers today are shit and want to steal other peoples stories and put their little identity politics in where there was none before. Their method of separating from the author is by injecting their little soapbox instead of a cool alternate story.
Isn’t Rowling closely involved with yay or nay powers in this show?
Rewritten how? He who must not be deadnamed?
Dumbledore will now ensure he never deadnames Voldemort by calling him Tom
>(SHE/HIM)
>Marix
Latinx has progressed to names now?
'it' was unironically probably going for that
>mario
>maria
>marix
Fuck I was trying to shitpost, don't tell me I actually was right.
What transphobia? I get it. They hate JK. But there isn’t really any transphobia in Harry Potter. Now pro-slavery and eugenics? That exists.
>What is Rita Skeeta and Aunt Marge both clearly being intended as transwomen?
>What is Voldemort being deadnamed constantly by Dumbledore?
How the hell are those bitches trans at all?
Trannies immediately assume masculine women are trannies.
It's like pottery
Rita is portrayed as being exceedingly feminine in both dress and temperament though, and no way would the ever prim and proper Dursley's accept aunt Marge if she were anything other than that.
Any type of portrayal can be construed to be seen as ""transphobic"" given enough mental gymnastics.
>Voldemort deadnamed
Voldemort isnt a tranny
'i am lord Voldemort'
'tom marvolo riddle'
its a name he gave himself when he was an edgy teen that stuck and became what people call him, that isnt the same as some dude deciding to be called Jessica
what utter fucking nonsense, like the rest of the tranny movement
>its a name he gave himself when he was an edgy teen
So he's just like a tranny?
no it's not the same, it involves someone changing their name so it looks similar but isn't, just a guy giving himself a nickname, like calling the fonz Arthur isnt dead naming him
I get deadnamed everytime somebody doesn't call me by my gamertag I made back in 2003. I feel his pain.
I'm curious, where the hell do they believe there's any transphobia in the books themselves? You would think if it was in the books, Rowling's opinions on it wouldn't have come as such a shock to these lunatics.
But there's nothing transphobic in the books. There's nothing even about trannies to begin with. JK Rowling only became known by troons for her gender politics on twitter. It's got nothing to do with the books, so what is there to rewrite?
Trans and enby characters need to be included in the plot to offset Rowling's horrifying transphobia. And they need to be main characters as well, not just background ones.
I'll put a tenner on Luna getting rewritten as trans first.
I don't think rewriting one of the mentally strongest female characters (and a fan favorite) to be male is going to go over well with the idiots pushing for trans representation. They don't want their favorites to be changed, they want the ones they don't care about to be sacrificed on their unholy altar.
Strangely, your argument just makes me more certain that is the character they'd change first.
Honestly in 2023 we should have a main trans character like Harry or Hermione
JK practically had her hand down her pants when writing Thatcher stand-in Umbridge, she's only considered evil and fascist now because of genderspecial shit and current year goblin discourse, because she was your standard bonglib prior
Rowling is a crusty old feminist who hates men. Harry Potter was always globalist neoliberal propaganda. Let the hags and troons duke it out. Not my problem.
Trannies so mad they can't stop Rowling from making money from her own work or force her to sold all her rights to Yidney, I love it.
Meant to post pic rel but that still works.
wtf that's literally me
Rowling wants a nagger Hermione and she made Dumbledore a homosexual.
Don't care, I just want to see troons lose.
It's so lame, because the game itself has a prominent trans character voiced by a tranny, so they did everything they could to kowtow to the insane mob, while the insane mob boycut their game.
It just tells you never give in, it's never enough.
Troons must eradicated
there was no transphobia in Harry Potter, there's no evidence Rowling even knew what a trans person was prior to 2017-2018
and no, Rita Skeeter having "mannish hands" doesn't count as transhpobia
Correct. It's just sexist writing.
Women are currently worse than trannies right now so I'm supporting them.
the morons who write this shit realize Rowling would actually have to sign off on something like that right?
JK Rowling has the final say on everything. The only reason a tranny was in the video game is because she gave it the okay and made the creature humiliating and called “Sir-ona Ryan”
She won’t let them, she is a based tranny destroyer.
She will let them fill it with homosexuals and naggers though because she isn’t that based.
If that's what they want, they can wait until 80 some years after she dies.
Granted that's about ten times their life expectancy, but still.
>stain of transphobia
what stain? the author doesn't like troons, that isn't within the books
Harry>HarSHE
Hermione>Hermione
Ron>'Roon
You mean Hormione
Literally nobody saw a strain of transphobia in Harry Potter while the primary audience of it was growing up and adored the books. Now the same people have grown up to be super woke trannies, and they are seething that the author of subject of their childhood admiration decided to double down on being reasonable after her woke episode.
>Being the original authoer should not give the right to veto good changes.
Reminder trannies want to control every aspect of creativity and creation. They should be hanged and burned.
Isn't the series set in the late 80s and early 90s? So that is their out.