How did he mean by this?
https://www.nationalreview.com/2022/07/snydergate-a-film-and-media-scandal/
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
How did he mean by this?
https://www.nationalreview.com/2022/07/snydergate-a-film-and-media-scandal/
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
did Armond White have a white ancestor? Or is his Black person ancestor an autist who named himself white?
Don't you know they got their surnames from the owners of their slave ancestors?
Then why are they all named "king"?
i cant disagree
I really don't understand this man. He really seems like a Cinemaphile shitposter.
There are people who are so smart that it bends back around and they are really smart half the time and incoherently stupid the other half of the time because they're thinking on such a different level they go off the tracks.
Per usual he is correct
Armond is a gay so he loves Snyder movies which are filled with homoeroticism. Armond wrote an entire paragraph about how horny he was for Aquaman in his justice league review
I feel obligated to support Snyder because he adapts a lot of shit by Frank Miller which gives his movies a right-wing feeling
The only reviewer i will ever read. Everything else is cringe. Other reviewers base their judgements on objective aesthetic qualities, screenwriting etc. White literally just bases his reviews on his own totally impenetrable inner logic which is divorced from any external reality. I love it, it's so much better than fricking Rex Reed or whatever affirming every normie by giving the MCU good reviews
Snyder and Miller are both libertarians who love Ayn Rand. They do not hold thorough right wing beliefs, and even Miller has pulled back from the islamophobia in recent years. He also supports gays and transgenders, has multiple such characters as heroes in sin city. Both are just idit reactionaries they dont really believe in it.
>Other reviewers base their judgements on objective aesthetic qualities, screenwriting etc. White literally just bases his reviews on his own totally impenetrable inner logic which is divorced from any external reality.
Scariffi approved
>Other reviewers base their judgements on objective aesthetic qualities, screenwriting etc. White literally just bases his reviews on his own totally impenetrable inner logic which is divorced from any external reality.
This, he literally doesn't give a frick
>feel obligated to support Snyder because he adapts a lot of shit by Frank Miller which gives his movies a right-wing feeling
That’s the whole reason Armond White jerks off Snyder so much. National review is a conservative magazine. He’s told by his publishers and editors to say the shit he does
I mean obviously
Its the fricking National Review who do you expect them to hire for movie reviews
They dont exactly have any top talent to pick from. Armond White is easily the best right wing media critic because he can actually craft a compelling and winkingly funny sentence, unlike the likes of Shapiro who just sperg out humorlessly
National review doesn't make shit up like the New York times
they got a Pulitzer for linking trumps campaign and Russia , and another for proving hunters laptop was Russian disinfo
/ourguy/ he remains
Still /our guy/
He has a point. Snyder single handedly elevated super hero movies to a place of artistic legitimacy.
I would pay good money to see Armond White fight Scott Mendehlson
Armond White is one of my favorite critics. His reviews cause constant debate over whether they're serious. You can read, and sure enough detect sincerity behind his words, but is it all an act? I don't think so. The Thumbs Up israelites (Ebert, Siskel) and this guy are all I care about hearing from...sometimes Mike.
>elite media demonizing synder
the same media which supported ray fisher claims his skin color was altered and booyaa?
>One Of The Best Films of Century
GOOD FRICKING MORNING SIRS!
>White is known for his provocative, idiosyncratic[2] and often contrarian reviews, which have made him a controversial figure in film criticism.[3] These include negative reviews of widely acclaimed movies such as The Dark Knight, There Will Be Blood, Up, Toy Story 3, and Get Out. He has championed critically disliked films such as G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra, Jonah Hex, Grown Ups, and I Now Pronounce You Chuck & Larry, the latter of which he indicated as being a better gay-themed film than Brokeback Mountain. His work led film critic Roger Ebert to label White as a "smart and knowing [...] troll."[4]
>I Now Pronounce You Sneed (Formerly Chuck) & Larry
Pathetic self-hating gay. Biggest claim to fame is getting kicked out of some award show.
Armond is the only gay who has actual pride. He recognizes that gays in media are minstrels.
Shut Up Rian
I like Zack Snyder but I can't take White's support of him seriously, he's just being contrarian. He liked the theatrical cut of Justice League.
>he didn't appreciate voluptuous aquaman
I mean you shouldnt take anything the National Review publishes seriously, that shit is like unironic The Onion
Where is the article he's referring to? It sounds more interesting than old man yelling at clouds
Wait a fricking second, didn't Armond praise Josstice League and disliked the Snydercut?
Nope
He praised josstice league at the time
The King has spoken.