Batman Begins is a terrible movie and the Nolans are hacks. >Bad guy uses a "microwave emitter" that causes water to instantly vaporize / boil in UNDERGROUND PIPES from >100 feet in the air >Somehow, this device has no impact on blood in the human body, which is (>50% water) or the human body in general which is 60% water) >You can stand right next to it and the microwaves do nothing to a human >Somehow, despite Scarecrow's men dumping the toxin into the water for WEEKS, not a single person in Gotham ever boiled water to make food thus exposing them to the toxin.
Fricking moronic piece of shit movie. and yes, shit like this matters because it shows that the writers couldn't be bothered to think critically about the slop they write. I can't stand when writers are just fricking lazy.
they literally show it in the movie just vaporizing everything around it, that's what it was designed to do. It doesn't aim at anything and it's never specified to be aimed at anything in the movie.
Also, you never rebutted the fact that Scarecrow is dumping his toxin into the water supply for days / weeks and yet no one in Gotham City boiled water or heated up water hot enough to cause the toxin to vaporize during that time period lol
Batman Begins weapon is based on the weapon from the original Batman movie, which actually was used to vaporize people. It would turn them into piles of dust.
There’s a few nods to the 60s Batman in pretty much every Batman movie. The museum scene in Batman (1989) is based on the episode Pop Goes The Joker, and the mayoral campaign in Batman Returns is based on Hizzonner the Penguin. Jokers mask in the heist scene in The Dark Knight is the same as a mask Joker wore in the episode The Joker Is Wild. Some people also say the bomb sequence in The Dark Knight Rises is based on the “someday you just can’t get rid of a bomb” scene, but I don’t know if that’s intentional or just coincidence. Joker (2019) had a scene where Bruce does a spinning slide down a fireman pole, The Batman (2022) had a Shakespeare bust in the background, and there’s definitely more stuff like that I’m forgetting.
The Nolan films all have absolutely bizarre shit in them >Ras Al Ghoul has some weird accelerationism plan instead of extortion or whatever >Cillian Murphy is in all the films despite having no significant role >Bruce Wayne as a playboy alter ego is never really explored >TDK has two third acts, neither of which are really satisfying >Batman is hunted at the end of TDK because nobody thinks about blaming Joker for Harvey's death >Bane continues Ras Al Ghoul's plans instead of having his own >A plotpoint in TDKR is that Bane goes to the stock market and forces Glenn Powell to put billions of Bruce Waynes stocks on a thumbdrive and it makes him flat broke for some reason >Every single cop is sent into one tunnel and Bane blows it closed and then weeks later all of them emerge still in uniform, then they all charge to melee fight Banes army who doesn't mow them down with guns >Bane is anti-climatically killed by Catwoman
Murphy is in all the films despite having no significant role
I liked that Jackstraw was still around Gotham. If you are gonna have side characters and villains, might as well have reoccuring ones. I wish more Batman films had lower tier villians still arou dGotham mucking about. Itbis a crime ridden shithole after all.
>BB
its a ok movie up until the end which is completely botched. i don't know what happens exactly but the movie turns into garbage >TDK
absolute perfection. every second is a fine tuned masterpiece time with the precision of a swiss timepiece >TDKR
thats just moronic but bane is goated
>absolute perfection. every second is a fine tuned masterpiece time with the precision of a swiss timepiece
It really is, and honestly the monologues that they put into Joker and Two Faces' dialogue at the end... that was so great, it's such a shame that Scarecrow, Bane and Talia never got that Billy Shakes treatment, killing off Ras quick made sense but they just repeated that rather than developing better closing dialogue.
and obviously you could say Scarecrow, Bane and Talia weren't as profound, but a screenwriter would still have to demonstrate their human presence, or what made them iconic as villains and it can't be done entirely through visuals. Murphy's Scarecrow was developing some nice opening monologues so it's surprising that he's just reading legal jargon to close out in TDKR. Maybe it segued nicely into Oppenheimer somehow but I think there was a conscious creative decision to focus more exclusively on the role of positive characters which often maligns some necessary character arcs, like Cobb's wife in Inception might be another example, a lot of the villains are just 'shades'.
8================D~~~~
Batman Begins is a terrible movie and the Nolans are hacks.
>Bad guy uses a "microwave emitter" that causes water to instantly vaporize / boil in UNDERGROUND PIPES from >100 feet in the air
>Somehow, this device has no impact on blood in the human body, which is (>50% water) or the human body in general which is 60% water)
>You can stand right next to it and the microwaves do nothing to a human
>Somehow, despite Scarecrow's men dumping the toxin into the water for WEEKS, not a single person in Gotham ever boiled water to make food thus exposing them to the toxin.
Fricking moronic piece of shit movie. and yes, shit like this matters because it shows that the writers couldn't be bothered to think critically about the slop they write. I can't stand when writers are just fricking lazy.
He aimed it at the pipes, not people. Dumbass.
they literally show it in the movie just vaporizing everything around it, that's what it was designed to do. It doesn't aim at anything and it's never specified to be aimed at anything in the movie.
Also, you never rebutted the fact that Scarecrow is dumping his toxin into the water supply for days / weeks and yet no one in Gotham City boiled water or heated up water hot enough to cause the toxin to vaporize during that time period lol
literally the mcguflin
Batman Begins weapon is based on the weapon from the original Batman movie, which actually was used to vaporize people. It would turn them into piles of dust.
There’s a few nods to the 60s Batman in pretty much every Batman movie. The museum scene in Batman (1989) is based on the episode Pop Goes The Joker, and the mayoral campaign in Batman Returns is based on Hizzonner the Penguin. Jokers mask in the heist scene in The Dark Knight is the same as a mask Joker wore in the episode The Joker Is Wild. Some people also say the bomb sequence in The Dark Knight Rises is based on the “someday you just can’t get rid of a bomb” scene, but I don’t know if that’s intentional or just coincidence. Joker (2019) had a scene where Bruce does a spinning slide down a fireman pole, The Batman (2022) had a Shakespeare bust in the background, and there’s definitely more stuff like that I’m forgetting.
>why comic book movie about flying rich man not more real
The Nolan films all have absolutely bizarre shit in them
>Ras Al Ghoul has some weird accelerationism plan instead of extortion or whatever
>Cillian Murphy is in all the films despite having no significant role
>Bruce Wayne as a playboy alter ego is never really explored
>TDK has two third acts, neither of which are really satisfying
>Batman is hunted at the end of TDK because nobody thinks about blaming Joker for Harvey's death
>Bane continues Ras Al Ghoul's plans instead of having his own
>A plotpoint in TDKR is that Bane goes to the stock market and forces Glenn Powell to put billions of Bruce Waynes stocks on a thumbdrive and it makes him flat broke for some reason
>Every single cop is sent into one tunnel and Bane blows it closed and then weeks later all of them emerge still in uniform, then they all charge to melee fight Banes army who doesn't mow them down with guns
>Bane is anti-climatically killed by Catwoman
Murphy is in all the films despite having no significant role
I liked that Jackstraw was still around Gotham. If you are gonna have side characters and villains, might as well have reoccuring ones. I wish more Batman films had lower tier villians still arou dGotham mucking about. Itbis a crime ridden shithole after all.
I love BB and TDK and I enjoy TDKR, flaws and memes and all.
That's the order the films were released in, yeahj
>BB
its a ok movie up until the end which is completely botched. i don't know what happens exactly but the movie turns into garbage
>TDK
absolute perfection. every second is a fine tuned masterpiece time with the precision of a swiss timepiece
>TDKR
thats just moronic but bane is goated
>absolute perfection. every second is a fine tuned masterpiece time with the precision of a swiss timepiece
It really is, and honestly the monologues that they put into Joker and Two Faces' dialogue at the end... that was so great, it's such a shame that Scarecrow, Bane and Talia never got that Billy Shakes treatment, killing off Ras quick made sense but they just repeated that rather than developing better closing dialogue.
and obviously you could say Scarecrow, Bane and Talia weren't as profound, but a screenwriter would still have to demonstrate their human presence, or what made them iconic as villains and it can't be done entirely through visuals. Murphy's Scarecrow was developing some nice opening monologues so it's surprising that he's just reading legal jargon to close out in TDKR. Maybe it segued nicely into Oppenheimer somehow but I think there was a conscious creative decision to focus more exclusively on the role of positive characters which often maligns some necessary character arcs, like Cobb's wife in Inception might be another example, a lot of the villains are just 'shades'.
Batman is fricking gay
everything you like is gay
>defending a superhero
bruh you're double gay
>The Batman
>TDK
>Batman 89
Rest can frick off to hell.
Yeah, The Batman was a good cartoon
I know, I felt the same way. It had so much of BTAS in it. It was about time we finally got a good adaptation.
I agree, it renders them merely good compared to it's greatness. Without The Batman, they'd be great themselves.
>it renders them merely good compared to it's greatness. Without The Batman, they'd be great themselves.
They're all bad movies, mate.
I'm sorry you feel that way.
So sad.
The Batman makes the Nolan films look good.
>Batman 66
>Batman 89
>Batman Begins
All you ever need
Take out Begins and replace it with The Batman and I agree.
>All you ever need
Nah Mask of the Phantasm's great too
Mask Of The Phantasm is the best Batman film. So glad I saw it in theaters when it came out.
Agreed, but Forever > Returns > 89 > BB > TDK > TDKR
Breaking bad, turducken, turducken rises?
BB is really boring, TDKR is the best for obvious reasons
frick off. TDK is way better than the other two. I'm dunheir
TDK >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BB >>>>> TDKR