When they drew him in pictures from the renaissance they coloured his skin white, which is where the confusion comes from. They did that with everyone though including Jesus and Greeks.
Ask yourself this; where exactly is a white man going to get so many Elephants from?
They are continually rewriting history in the popular mind to give blacks something to do. These films and shows are always terrible because everything is done for that purpose rather than to entertain or even inform, so they have the same feeling as a really corny after school special.
When they drew him in pictures from the renaissance they coloured his skin white, which is where the confusion comes from. They did that with everyone though including Jesus and Greeks.
Ask yourself this; where exactly is a white man going to get so many Elephants from?
okay baboon.
hannibal wasn't black. he was brown at best. the egyptians weren't black. they were brown at best.
y'all noggers were dickwashing slaves and you try so hard to rewrite history to please your fricking ego, you know well your race only ever made it out of the mud huts because tribal leaders sold your ancestors to the israelites and brought you in touch with a real civilization. you want to believe you'd be wakanda but you were only ever destined to become detroit.
nah, Hannibal was black, brown isn't a race dumbs, swarthiness derives from black ancestry, what you are referring to is a mutt and no, mutts dont define an identity but the destruction of one
Romace cultures derive from BLACK people, Spanish, Italian, French all derive from latin, a warm vibrant culture vastly different from the cold listless germanic counterpart defined by its lack there of,
new world hispanics by proxy are sloppy seconds of getting blacked, as the moors gave Spain the cultural revolution that kicked started the age of exploration and maps to reach the new world. Modern Arabs are mutts thug speak a black language and engage in ancient black culture
blacks are the foundation of history
germanic barbarians only became relevant during the dark ages and rewrote history tp suit them, backwashing doesn't exist, whitewashing however does,
5 months ago
Anonymous
Can0t tell if posts like this one are made by trolls or blackbrains
5 months ago
Anonymous
trolls make them and blacks believe them
TND
5 months ago
Anonymous
Fair enough
5 months ago
Anonymous
let me simplify it since most people get lost in the noise
there are only 3 races
black
mongoloid
germanic
everything else is a mutt, combination of th above of
black however have a larger pool of expression so you have a multifaceted image and can't be pinned down like the mongoloid or the germanic
pic related is ana example of such, a pedigree Polynesian, black but expressed epigenticlly for its own special circumstances
That real diversity, not fake modern data diversity created through jvjwt mixing
5 months ago
Anonymous
this for example is a real Arab
black, but epigenetically expressed to fit its special circumstances
No, back in those days the coasts in northen Africa were prime land for civilizations and cities., the feral spear chucking black man did not live by the ocean, they stayed in their mud huts down south.
man, it fricking sucks. If only black people had invented a form of writing, they could have recorded all the inventions and achievements they had made over millennia.
1000%, those were scribed during roman reign of Egypt, thats ta properly expressed phenotype of the region, not the mutts that exist there currently, that have retroactively become the face of a culture unrelated to them
They'll introduce Scipio as an even blacker Black person as the only one who can stop him after all the incompetent honkies fail.
Why else would he be called Africanus, goy?
>your capital city burned down >all your lands conquered >most of your people are death >those that survived are enslaved, forced to serve your enemy >2000 years later your greatest general gets portrayed as a Black person
The humiliation never ends.
>Hannibal, the good guy who's had enough with these monkey-fighting roman snakes in his five hundred to nine hundred human sacrificing city >romans will all be portrayed by incompetent and effeminate anglos >Scipio will be played by the black guy from Tenet/Creator >they'll have a bro moment where they have to fight each other but don't want to because white people made them do it >love interest for both of them are white women >rap music every time there's combat >random asian kung fu soldiers also appear >cgi elephants three stories high >final hand to hand combat between Hannibal and Scipio is on the back of an elephant that's rampaging through Rome >directed by Fuqua
modern meds are muted germnaics with native admixture, its not a race, but an almagmagtion which is why they look similar to Arabs since they suffer they same circumstance.
Andrew Tate looks Arab but descends from a black patriarch
same as the rock, this is the multigenerational effects of misgnation, obscuring paper phenotypes and creating a fake mean
Just popping in to point out that simping for Carthage is the mark of the true contrarian. I can understand feeling bad for Gaul or the Britons, but Carthage was just a rival slaving empire. They absolutely would have done to Rome what Rome did to them had the roles been reversed, and they came pretty close to doing just that, had Hannibal been less of a strategic moron and struck at Rome while he had the chance instead of raiding random towns and villages in the Italian countryside.
He had just made a decisive victory over the Roman army and had scattered their forces. Rome was right in front of him, ripe for the taking and practically undefended. His own fricking officers are documented to have been begging him to attack Rome while he could and were practically pulling their hair out when he decided to go sack some villages instead.
Bruh, Rome wasn't undefended. There were still more Roman legions in the field and the allies mostly stayed loyal. Hannibal had also lost a big portion of his army and couldn't settle in for a siege when new Roman forces could attack him from behind.
Hannibal like everyone else at the time fought one or two battles before peace talks happen. He hoped to whip the Romans a few times and then get a peace treaty. Rome on the other hand just keeps going when they lose.
>and they came pretty close to doing just that
Why are midwits so confident in their opinion after reading a Wikipedia article
+80% of Rome's forces were in Sicily, Hannibal wasn't enough of a threat to even recall them
Xanthippus got closer to defeating the Romans than Hannibal ever did
To remove the possibility of any goodwill between the sides, Spendius, encouraged by his fellow leader the Gaul Autaritus,[68] had 700 Carthaginian prisoners, including Gisco, tortured to death: they had their hands cut off, were castrated, had their legs broken and were thrown into a pit and buried alive.[65][69] The mercenary leader and skilled polyglot orator Autaritus is cited by Polybius as a chief instigator of this massacre. Hamilcar, in turn, killed his prisoners.
After a period of campaigning, the details of which are not clear in the sources, Hamilcar trapped the rebels in a pass or mountain range known as the Saw. Pinned against mountains and with their food exhausted, the rebels ate their horses, their prisoners and then their slaves, hoping that Matho would sortie from Tunis to rescue them. Eventually, the surrounded troops forced their leaders to parley with Hamilcar, but on a thin pretext, he took Spendius and his lieutenants prisoner. The rebels then attempted to fight their way out in the Battle of the Saw and were massacred to a man.[76][77]
It would make some sort of weird sense if Hannibal was a mercenary general, but he came from a ruling Carthaginian family, which implies that the ruling elite of Carthage were black.
current europeans are germanic invaders from the steeps, there main past time is stealing past identities and making shitty movies and casting themselves in roles they dont belong, that brings us herehavgp and it comes full circle
>Hannibal takes the long way round the sea via Gibraltar to get to Rome >Scipio does the same the other way round >both conquered everything in the way
How is this even possible? Were everyone else just shitters?
Small towns capitulate, allies defect or already moving along with Hannibal or Scipio on the opposite side of the Mediterranean, everything else is empty shit.
>Italy
>White
>Romans
>Italian
God cursed the Romans for killing Christ by turning them Italian
>Romans killing Christ
I wonder who could be behind this post
protestant = israelite without the hooked nose
>Italy
>Not white
If Italy is not white literally all white civilization is just mindless savages larping as civilized people.
Why is he old
ITT : Americans throwing a fit about le not-trve depiction of Italian history.
Why wouldn't they?
This shit come from them, and it's normal that americans are the first one embarassed by that
No. It's because they consider themselves directed related to historical Italians and Greeks. It's a kanging thing, not embarassment.
Nah
>opposing or making fun of we wuzzing is actually wewuzzing
That’s some Olympic level mental gymnastics
but phonecians aren't black
But Denzel is gonna phone it in
If he came from the continent of africa then he must have been as night you fucjing ignorant chud
Denzel's white though.
They are continually rewriting history in the popular mind to give blacks something to do. These films and shows are always terrible because everything is done for that purpose rather than to entertain or even inform, so they have the same feeling as a really corny after school special.
Hannibal was actually black.
When they drew him in pictures from the renaissance they coloured his skin white, which is where the confusion comes from. They did that with everyone though including Jesus and Greeks.
Ask yourself this; where exactly is a white man going to get so many Elephants from?
NAFRI, not black.
Lebanon isn't "nafri"
>Lebanon
He’s from Tunisia, smart one
Don't look up where the metropolises of the Punic city states were located.
okay baboon.
hannibal wasn't black. he was brown at best. the egyptians weren't black. they were brown at best.
y'all noggers were dickwashing slaves and you try so hard to rewrite history to please your fricking ego, you know well your race only ever made it out of the mud huts because tribal leaders sold your ancestors to the israelites and brought you in touch with a real civilization. you want to believe you'd be wakanda but you were only ever destined to become detroit.
nah, Hannibal was black, brown isn't a race dumbs, swarthiness derives from black ancestry, what you are referring to is a mutt and no, mutts dont define an identity but the destruction of one
wienersucker
Cope
thats right, cope
Lol ok blackwasher
Romace cultures derive from BLACK people, Spanish, Italian, French all derive from latin, a warm vibrant culture vastly different from the cold listless germanic counterpart defined by its lack there of,
new world hispanics by proxy are sloppy seconds of getting blacked, as the moors gave Spain the cultural revolution that kicked started the age of exploration and maps to reach the new world. Modern Arabs are mutts thug speak a black language and engage in ancient black culture
blacks are the foundation of history
germanic barbarians only became relevant during the dark ages and rewrote history tp suit them, backwashing doesn't exist, whitewashing however does,
Can0t tell if posts like this one are made by trolls or blackbrains
trolls make them and blacks believe them
TND
Fair enough
let me simplify it since most people get lost in the noise
there are only 3 races
black
mongoloid
germanic
everything else is a mutt, combination of th above of
black however have a larger pool of expression so you have a multifaceted image and can't be pinned down like the mongoloid or the germanic
pic related is ana example of such, a pedigree Polynesian, black but expressed epigenticlly for its own special circumstances
That real diversity, not fake modern data diversity created through jvjwt mixing
this for example is a real Arab
black, but epigenetically expressed to fit its special circumstances
>blackstory
Sure buddy, sure
whatever you say
I know this is bait but they didn't use sub-saharan elephants. Elephants used in war came from North Africa and India.
No, back in those days the coasts in northen Africa were prime land for civilizations and cities., the feral spear chucking black man did not live by the ocean, they stayed in their mud huts down south.
man, it fricking sucks. If only black people had invented a form of writing, they could have recorded all the inventions and achievements they had made over millennia.
Hannibal was black, as was the entire region,
deal with it
>pic unrelated
1000%, those were scribed during roman reign of Egypt, thats ta properly expressed phenotype of the region, not the mutts that exist there currently, that have retroactively become the face of a culture unrelated to them
You're suffering brain rot
your suffering imposter syndrome
is that elon's face on that woman
I love serena, that is all
they probably already tried that, probably darker in real life than what's depicted in the image
This is the portrait on your sarcophagus, the definitive representation of you in life that will form your image in the afterlife.
2000 years later, in the afterlife... "What the frick? Why has the word 'Alamy' appeared on y face???"
"Oh they own your 2000 year old painting now somehow, despite Steamboat Willy, Winnie the Pooh and Sherlock Holmes all being public domain."
They own that particular photo of the portrait, not the portrait
Not the aristocracy
Don’t care
I’ve been begging for a hannibal-kino as long as I can remember. If denzel is leading the frontlines, so be it. Could be way worse.
romans were black too
deal with it
WE
>tfw Cinemaphile still shilled him as the based black actor when he's been in raceswapped slop and has race mixed
What now?
I don't blame him for taking a paycheck on a bloated Ridley Scott project. There's no Crowe so this isn't really a sequel.
every feminists wet dream
They'll introduce Scipio as an even blacker Black person as the only one who can stop him after all the incompetent honkies fail.
Why else would he be called Africanus, goy?
more black on black violence smdh
>your capital city burned down
>all your lands conquered
>most of your people are death
>those that survived are enslaved, forced to serve your enemy
>2000 years later your greatest general gets portrayed as a Black person
The humiliation never ends.
They were cannibaals descended from the Canaanites. Of course Hollywood would make a movie glorifying them
Vae Victis. Scipio wins again!
Carthago kang'd est
>Denzel Washington Will Terrorize Rome
WTF IS HIS FRICKING PROBLEM
>Hannibal, the good guy who's had enough with these monkey-fighting roman snakes in his five hundred to nine hundred human sacrificing city
>romans will all be portrayed by incompetent and effeminate anglos
>Scipio will be played by the black guy from Tenet/Creator
>they'll have a bro moment where they have to fight each other but don't want to because white people made them do it
>love interest for both of them are white women
>rap music every time there's combat
>random asian kung fu soldiers also appear
>cgi elephants three stories high
>final hand to hand combat between Hannibal and Scipio is on the back of an elephant that's rampaging through Rome
>directed by Fuqua
will all be portrayed by incompetent and effeminate anglos
This is accurate at least
Will Tunisians throw a fit about this like Egyptians did about black Cleo, despite them not being Phoenicians either?
>are these defeated african monkeys living a better life then me?
>over my death body!!!!
>Black man slaughters
Hannibal was closer to med in complexion than sub-saharan and don't let afro-centric morons tell you otherwise
modern meds are muted germnaics with native admixture, its not a race, but an almagmagtion which is why they look similar to Arabs since they suffer they same circumstance.
Andrew Tate looks Arab but descends from a black patriarch
same as the rock, this is the multigenerational effects of misgnation, obscuring paper phenotypes and creating a fake mean
>semitic people are black
kek
Is there anything that cannot be blackwashed?
>WE
Hannibal wasn't black as in an african
>Hannibal is from Africa
>everyone knows blacks are from Africa
Checks out.
Like Elon Musk and Charlize Theron?
WE WUZ ELFANT RIDERS N SHEET YO!
DEEZ ROMANS AINT FINNA NO WHAT HIT EM
DEY GON BE GIT GUD
>Tall, dark and handsome
Next you're going to tell me dark doesn't mean black
Well according to these people Hermione being described as pale doesn't mean she must be white.
chudcel
No.
It has always been used for people like Sean Connery or Tyrone Power
It's just woketards who thinks about nothign but africans
Just popping in to point out that simping for Carthage is the mark of the true contrarian. I can understand feeling bad for Gaul or the Britons, but Carthage was just a rival slaving empire. They absolutely would have done to Rome what Rome did to them had the roles been reversed, and they came pretty close to doing just that, had Hannibal been less of a strategic moron and struck at Rome while he had the chance instead of raiding random towns and villages in the Italian countryside.
>just besiege a fortified city in hostile territory when your homeland is on the other side of an ocean
Shit or get off the pot.
He had just made a decisive victory over the Roman army and had scattered their forces. Rome was right in front of him, ripe for the taking and practically undefended. His own fricking officers are documented to have been begging him to attack Rome while he could and were practically pulling their hair out when he decided to go sack some villages instead.
Bruh, Rome wasn't undefended. There were still more Roman legions in the field and the allies mostly stayed loyal. Hannibal had also lost a big portion of his army and couldn't settle in for a siege when new Roman forces could attack him from behind.
Then why go there in the first place if it wasn't possible?
Hannibal like everyone else at the time fought one or two battles before peace talks happen. He hoped to whip the Romans a few times and then get a peace treaty. Rome on the other hand just keeps going when they lose.
I'm just glad Rome won. Otherwise the world might be ruled by Semitic cult slavers today
>and they came pretty close to doing just that
Why are midwits so confident in their opinion after reading a Wikipedia article
+80% of Rome's forces were in Sicily, Hannibal wasn't enough of a threat to even recall them
Xanthippus got closer to defeating the Romans than Hannibal ever did
>dude just besiege this massive city that you can't even encircle properly and will get its supplies from the harbor anyways
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercenary_War
To remove the possibility of any goodwill between the sides, Spendius, encouraged by his fellow leader the Gaul Autaritus,[68] had 700 Carthaginian prisoners, including Gisco, tortured to death: they had their hands cut off, were castrated, had their legs broken and were thrown into a pit and buried alive.[65][69] The mercenary leader and skilled polyglot orator Autaritus is cited by Polybius as a chief instigator of this massacre. Hamilcar, in turn, killed his prisoners.
After a period of campaigning, the details of which are not clear in the sources, Hamilcar trapped the rebels in a pass or mountain range known as the Saw. Pinned against mountains and with their food exhausted, the rebels ate their horses, their prisoners and then their slaves, hoping that Matho would sortie from Tunis to rescue them. Eventually, the surrounded troops forced their leaders to parley with Hamilcar, but on a thin pretext, he took Spendius and his lieutenants prisoner. The rebels then attempted to fight their way out in the Battle of the Saw and were massacred to a man.[76][77]
>Roman slave
>Spendius
Well we can be sure he wasn't israeli otherwise his name would be Hoardius
Why do americucks think north africans are black
Probably their shitty schools
They also still think Africa is a nation
It would make some sort of weird sense if Hannibal was a mercenary general, but he came from a ruling Carthaginian family, which implies that the ruling elite of Carthage were black.
Even if he wasn't black which the carthagenians weren't, Hannibal was in his 30s during the second Punic war
this is a real European
black, but epigenetically expressed to fit its special circumstances
current europeans are germanic invaders from the steeps, there main past time is stealing past identities and making shitty movies and casting themselves in roles they dont belong, that brings us herehavgp and it comes full circle
Carthagians were Phoenicians (Lebanese) they did not mix with Numidians (Berbers). Numidians were not Nubians.
>but but but muh berbers muh numidians
meanwhile tunisians, Algerians and Moroccans are holding pogroms against subsaharans
Berbers weren't black either
He was LYBIAN. L-Y-B-I-A-N. Descended from people from the LEVANT. Why is this so fricking hard for americans?
>Hannibal
>black
>Hannibal takes the long way round the sea via Gibraltar to get to Rome
>Scipio does the same the other way round
>both conquered everything in the way
How is this even possible? Were everyone else just shitters?
Small towns capitulate, allies defect or already moving along with Hannibal or Scipio on the opposite side of the Mediterranean, everything else is empty shit.
>Black actor is the le good guy
Everybody loves the white "bad" guy
>Black actor is the bad guy
Everybody loves the white good guy
>Black actor is both the bad and good guy
Everybody skips the movie
Jews cant win.
Also Hannibal was European and he probably never saw a dark skinned fellow in his life...
They said this 20 years ago and the movie was never made
Netflix wants to get sued by tunisia as well as egypt?