Brosbros this cant be happening not like this

Brosbros… this can’t be happening… not like this…

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

CRIME Shirt $21.68

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Don’t care. It was epic

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    They made this movie specifically so it would flop and OP could make the "Brosbros" joke.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/mWGjilD.jpg

      Brosbros… this can’t be happening… not like this…

      >They made this movie specifically so it would flop and OP could make the "Brosbros" joke.
      kek

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah but they wouldn't need to make it a flop. "brosbros, we did it" or "oh nononono anitbrosbros we got too wienery" works just as well, but actually it's even better because you don't need to lose millions of dollars on a shitty gay movie either.

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >movie attacking straight men outright
    >it flops
    >blame straight men

    Its like the very people they pander to do even care for the products they are producing. hmmmmmmmmmmmmm

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I’m gay as frick and even I or my friends weren’t interested in this shit from the trailer. It’s pandering to the most niche subset of gays.

    Also Billy Eichner is just insufferable

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      same, I couldn't make it through the trailer and I'm a sucker for trailers in general. as a gaygay, I had 0 interest in this. doesn't seem remotely broey or comfy at all, let alone an interesting or compelling relationship.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >as a gaygay
        This made me laugh way more than it should.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          as a gaygatron, as a homopilled androphile, as a twinkbender, etc.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            wiener Jockey is the preferred nomenclature.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Surely it’s feces and blood connoisseur

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          gaygay wouldve been funnier

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Hello fello Gaybro

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          keep your hands where I can see them, Kevin

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I don't feel like reading the worthless opinion of a homosexual, care to remove yourself to

      [...]

      ?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        or, conversely, you can just leave the thread about a homosexual movie to avoid opinions from homosexuals. moronic homosexual. lol

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Stop making homosexual threads.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            nah. seethe.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      same, I couldn't make it through the trailer and I'm a sucker for trailers in general. as a gaygay, I had 0 interest in this. doesn't seem remotely broey or comfy at all, let alone an interesting or compelling relationship.

      Why don't you gays just leave planet Earth? I hear Alpha Centauri a is good for the gays.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >I’m gay as frick and even I or my friends weren’t interested in this shit from the trailer. It’s pandering to the most niche subset of gays.
      same and i know, and i hate that american media is now exploiting gayness so heavily, i refuse to support them ruining one of the last things that are sacred in life after what they did to star wars

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Explain to me why you don't feel attracted to girls, their breasts and pussys and their bodys.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Because I'm attracted to men, their pecs, and their butts and their bodys.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          A good ending to a nice gay thread

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Doesn’t this actually have them joking about shitting on each other’s dicks? Yeah big surprise

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >dude I just laid a log on your dong bro haha
      >I know broski lol that shit nasty af haha no homosexual tho

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous
      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        lmao isn't that guy orangepeanut? they doing my homie dirty fr fr

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          no hes our lord and savior who deepthroated a week's load of boba

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It’s too soon, not enough gay people

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Give me a movie with the hunk; get rid of the old israelite.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Lmao she's seething

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        She’s probably freaking out that she could have aids

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        where can I find homophobic gf these days?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          That's (secretly) most women.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      where is this from? I've seen this webmd multiple times and still don't know

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Pretty sure I'm the only one who ever posts it.
        Thing is, I have no idea where it's from. I saved it from Cinemaphile.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          so no idea of the full context? makes me curious

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            search touching people's hand on youtube

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >makes me curious
            Easy tiger.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Looks like some prank or social experiment video but I don't really know.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      He's thinking about going to the gay side, and she knows it.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >thinking about
        did you see him, dude's already a full on homosexual.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      God I hate women so much. I wish I was gay, bros.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Do women actually get that mad if a gay hits on their guy? Kek

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      She’s so fricking mad from just one little touch kek. Thank god I don’t have to deal with women

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Do women actually get that mad if a gay hits on their guy? Kek

        He's thinking about going to the gay side, and she knows it.

        Morons. The joke is that he’s secretly down low and the two gays clearly had a history with him and recognized him and waved

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          sounds like you have to be a homosexual to get the joke.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      stupid c**t has to ruin everything

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >that was weird
      >but not weirder than the camera following me and my genuine reaction down the stairs. that one was random lol
      you demented zoomers are genuinely mentally impaired

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        The guys going up are the prankers, yes, that's their genuine reaction.

        Pretty good as far as pranks go.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Dude looks like he needed the ego boost

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      He’s gay, she knows it, they sensed it.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >gay men never have to deal with female hysteria

      i wish i knew what it was like

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        their entire persona is based on feminine autism dude

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Maybe the walking stereotype ones, but you'd be an idiot to get anywhere near one in the first place.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      He's thinking about going to the gay side, and she knows it.

      He’s gay, she knows it, they sensed it.

      He definitely looks like a gay already, something about the stance or mannerism.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I hope I never get pranked like this because I'd physically recoil like I touched a hot stove. Not because I hate gays but just cause I hate people touching me, but I'd look like a gay hater.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Her internal "logic" must be screaming
      >but I have an butthole too!

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      He's too good for that dumb fat b***h

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    gay bros... did we just lose???

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      only in western media. asian media has exploded in popularity with gay/bl movies and shows, there's even franchises kek.

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    who were they even making this movie for?
    like, what was the target audience?
    men don't tend to like romcoms and straight men aren't generally too fond of gay shit

    women idk, but i think the ones that actually do like romcoms wanna see a woman who has to choose between two chads fighting over her
    the minority of women that are into gay shit like 2d boys or androgynous twinks, not macho masc/normal type guys

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      It’s the perfect movie for middle-aged women to take their gay friend too and that’s about it.

      Pretty much every gay guy I know from the trailer thought this shit sucked, most notably because the main characters are just the most boring basic masculine straight-passing actors Hollywood could find and the script just reads of out of touch writers picking out buzzwords to talk about instead of just making a funny romcom with 2 guys

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >boring basic masculine straight-passing actors
        what trailer were you watching? they weren't straight-passing and, in fact, are mocking gay guys that do because of the usual seething resentment.

  10. 2 years ago
    Grant Richardson

    Brobrosbros bros, not like this bros.
    bro.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Brobrosbros bros, DID WE GET TOO wienerY!?!?!?

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Will we ever overcome homophobia?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      No, because it's LITERALLY human-nature to be disgusted by gays..

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Sure babe

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    What is gay?

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    dude remember gay people?

    they had a nice run.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      they have been replaced by trannies
      and trannies are in the process of being replaced by hrt femboys

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        finally

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        what a time to be alive

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        finally

        what a time to be alive

        honestly making a distinction between gays/troons/"femboys"/etc. is just splitting hairs...

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Hey if a homosexual wants to get dolled up and fricked like a woman but is sane enough to not chop off their dick and balls I respect that far more than these trannies and their rotten stinkholes.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            For me, I don't care if they cut their dicks off or not. I don't want gays wearing dresses and making out with each other in public/in front of children.
            So I'd respect a closet troon that presents itself normally as himself IRL and fists his rot hole at home in private than some intact creep in a dress running around the mall.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          you forgot tranners (troony + Cinemaphileners)
          our own /lgbt/ has a special breed of troony that has been crossed with /misc/ for added racism and has a visceral hatred for reddit troons

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            No idea what you're talking about. Gas all troons.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >trannies are in the process of being replaced by hrt femboys
        Their ultimate form, how many more straight men are we going to lose now, women adorer bros?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          More straight women for us bros.. it's a good thing.. I don't give a frick about if anyone cares that I'm a normal straight.man. who needs attention from normie morons anyway

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I fricking wish, maybe they actually pass well enough I can't tell but anytime I see one of their ilk in public its some square jaw linebacker looking fella with pigtails or some garish child-molesting abomination who will wear a dress and heels but keep the beard.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Glad their reign of terror is over now

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      yeah hopefully monkeypox will take care of the rest

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        It's unironically already over. There are like 0.00001% of them who got unlucky and will carry some gnarly scars but that's it.

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Brobros... I thought this would go hard but it just flopped out, did we get too wienery?

  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Completely unrealistic.
    That absolutely mensch on the left would want nothing to do with that homosexual on the right.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      im not homophobic but it is interesting how most gay relationships seem like expressions of some kind of fetish
      there are just not a lot of normal gay couples out there

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        It's almost like homosexuality as an "orientation" isn't real and it's just molestation victims and perverts seeking ever-more degenerate ways to acquire dopamine rushes

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          It's almost like heterosexuality as an "orientation" isn't real and it's just molestation victims and perverts seeking ever-more degenerate ways to aquire dopamine rushes

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        It's almost like homosexuality as an "orientation" isn't real and it's just molestation victims and perverts seeking ever-more degenerate ways to acquire dopamine rushes

        It's not that deep. They're just body types. It only makes sense that they'd aim for the same body type they're attracted to.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Why so different from straight people?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            It's not so different. Straight men would kill to be an attractive woman but unfortunately that's impossible. Not even trooning would reach the same result.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Straight men and women both are attracted to something that looks very different from them.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah I'm aware, what's your point?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      What the frick is a cub?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Underaged boy

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        a young version of a bear (chubby/hair/muscular older gay guy)

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >What the frick is a cub?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Is "chaser" what I think it is

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        it could mean either "bug chaser" (fetish for stds)
        or "troony chaser" (fetish for trannies)

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      w-what is a gym bunny?
      >captcha: PSY0P2

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Where is skinny fat?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      muscle pup?!

  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    What did they think was going to happen?
    >Oh man I can't wait to watch this movie about two gays gayging about
    - Nobody, not even actual gays

  17. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I thought this was some indie bullshit being viraled here
    >from Judd Apatow
    >$20 million budget
    lmfao Hollywood has literally forgotten how to make money

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >$20 million budget
      >for a gay romcom
      What the frick did they spend $20m on? Anal lube?
      So this was a tax write-off from the start wasn't it?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >from Judd Apatow
      I didn't know that. Good I hope he mortgage his house to do it. It would only feel better if I fricked his daughters.

      >$20 million budget
      >for a gay romcom
      What the frick did they spend $20m on? Anal lube?
      So this was a tax write-off from the start wasn't it?

      >What the frick did they spend $20m on? Anal lube?
      20 million is almost nothing these days. Fun Fact: studios actually budget for bad movie loss so they won't pay too much in taxes at the end of the year.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >>from Judd Apatow
        >I didn't know that. Good I hope he mortgage his house to do
        I doubt he funded most of it. He likely threw them 2 million, and his name, and maybe helped with casting a little

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Which one has a dick?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Neither. gay

      • 2 years ago
        single white female

        they cute

  18. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >movie about pedophile sodomy fetishists
    >no one wants to watch it
    shocker

  19. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >OY VEY, WHY DON'T THEY LIKE OUR HOMOSEXUAL PROPAGANDA?
    >GET MY COUSIN DAVID ON THE PHONE, TELL HIM TO DOUBLE THE NUMBER OF gayS IN HIS COMMERCIALS

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      homosexual is so last century, it's all about transexuality and self mutilation these days

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        homos and lesbos got pushed out of the lgbtqaifkjfkj3094 side-show anyway, by the big money troony lobby. https://suedonym.substack.com/p/inauthentic-selves-the-modern-lgbtq

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Oy gevalt, these meshugeenehs are giving so much extra work!

  20. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Why didn't all the pro-gay people go see this? Are you telling me that all these virtue signaling people don't really fricking care? Color me surprised.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Even as a gay this movie looked too gay for me.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        also it's another seething, catty ode to resentment against gays who don't assimilate to cancerous gay culture like good little drones.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >pro-gay
      They are called the prolapsed sweaty

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/mWGjilD.jpg

      Brosbros… this can’t be happening… not like this…

      It seems like a shit test by israelites. They've been shoehorning homosexuals into every other movie, but in supporting roles. They wanted to see how a full-fledged homosexual flick would do, and unfortunately the goyim haven't been brow-beaten enough.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >It seems like a shit test by israelites
        >shit test
        it's just a taste test among gay communities

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Sure, anon.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      This is what "go woke go broke" actually means. The people on social media who cream their pants over woke media, whether it be video games or movies, don't actually support it with their money. Just signalling support is enough for them to feel good about themselves.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Or, hear me out, it's because it's a bad movie written by the same unfunny people that wrote Trainwreck.
        Meanwhile, Heartstopper is doing really well.

  21. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >releasing this in the middle of a monkey pox epidemic
    very homophobic

  22. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Dahmer is doing well at least

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Dahmer is no longer classified as an Elgeebeetee tho

  23. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    4.8 million seems like a lot for some gay shit, no? I was hoping the opening would be sub 1 mil. Frick gays

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      4.8 million/ 20 dollar ticket price per adult
      240,000 homosexuals watched this shit
      There are, being conservative here, 350 million people.
      So 1.458% of the population are flaming homosexuals

      Somehow I find that comforting to know that while vocal they are a tiny fraction of the population, almost the same percentage of the population, as say, israelites.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        90% of the people who watched this are straight women

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          This
          it was a gay hag movie.
          The lisping gay who mentions Broadway, is a dead stereotype now to real gay people.
          It only lives on in the minds of gay hag white women.

  24. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Those ones get the rope first, creep.
    The ones we don't know are gays/are discreet get to live.
    The ones prancing around like strippers on TikTok and the library are gonna burn at the stake.

  25. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Why is it that cute girls kissing has mass appeal, but everybody is disgusted by boys kissing, even cute ones?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >why are people fine with girls kissing but are disgusted by media portraying ass groping breasts sucking monkey pox spreading 10 minutes uncensored anal sex scene

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Tons of fat, smelly, hambeast weeb girls love the cute boy homosexual genre though

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      One man can knock up 10 girls in one frick session.
      A pile of men "fricking" results only in bloody diarrhea and bile.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Lesbians are hot and homos are gross, simple as

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        No lesbians are rarely even hot. It's usually some ugly man faced butch dyke with some ugly millatto

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        even the bulldykes have been replaced in the lesbian category by trannies

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >yfw this is the average "lesbian" in the year of our lord 2022

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      lesbians are gay, anon. They don't like straight men and they don't like penetration
      And let me remind you that you will never be a women or a cute anime girl for that matter

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        stop being such a transphobic
        it's 2022 ffs, lesbians can have dicks too, chud

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Why is reddit so fricking pathetic? Seriously I think it's the worst congregation of cultist leftist and dumb troony's I've ever seen .. can't even go to my cities reddit sub without nonstop leftist smarmy bullshit everywhere

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >doesnt look like a woman
          >doesnt act like a woman
          >doesn't talk like a woman
          yep, must be a troony

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          God I fricking love trannies just for stuff like this. Get fricked femoids.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            It's pathetic. People try so fricking hard to impress a bunch of loser scumbag normies esp on fricking reddit. Why would I care about these incel.loser mentally ill leftist fricks.. they can go kill themselves

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              I don't care about them either, I just love every bit of damage they cause to females. Karma is a b***h, how ironic.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Oh I know.. I agree with you.. just tired of every fricking moron especially zoomers being such try hard cringey attention prostitutes. It's like go fricking have a nice day

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            stop being such a transphobic
            it's 2022 ffs, lesbians can have dicks too, chud

            Can i as male say I identify as a female and start dating lesbians? If they say i don't look like a woman I just call them a transphobe reinforcing gender stereotypes, womyn can have penises and men can have veganas. So they're basically forced to take wiener or be called a transphobe and cancelled on twitter.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Just remember everyone, this shit only exploded because they literally just ban all dissent. Everywhere. Its the primary purpose of socalled anti-bigotry rules.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        It's almost like every TV show and movie are written by men hating feminists.. like they pick militant activists to write all movies and tv shows now

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Apparently it's vice-versa for women, just look at fujos

  26. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    why is regular/masculine guys with twinks so fricking hot.

  27. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    As an extreme homosexual this movie turned me straight.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      you're still on Cinemaphile so I doubt you're straight

  28. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >$4.8 million
    that's still too much

  29. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Are all gay men so obnoxious and take on those homosexual affectations?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      No

      is being a gay cool?

      Yes

  30. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Why do dumb frick teenagers think it's so cool to dress cute and feminine? It's just stupid as frick and cringey

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      cause they get rewarded for it big time

      what do you get for being just a dude? nothing at all

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        The 'look at me' attention seeking bullshit is fricking tiresome as frick

  31. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >all webms but 1 deleted
    ????

  32. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    is being a gay cool?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I think it's cool

  33. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    We'll get 'em next time with the Romcom starring Hunter Schafer about how fricking trannies isn't gay

  34. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Why does every TV show and movie have a tough female character who is the main protagonist and she is always a lesbian or at least has a friend who is a lesbian. I rarely even see gay men it's all lesbian shit 99% of the time now

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Because straight men are disgusted by gay men, but nobody gives a frick about lesbians.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Implying anyone care about what straight men want.
        They'll watch whatever their wives tell them to kek

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      It is to trick straight men in to watching it wishing for a lez out scene that never comes.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      It's part of the practice of identity replacement. Writers want to write strong women, so they remove all the weak traits of women and replace those with male traits. That means women who are more physically strong, women who are confident to the point of narcissism, and women who don't need the support of men and instead seek out the attention of women.

  35. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I'm straight and I think billy is funny

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Bros might have had a better chance at the box office if they paired Andy Dick up with Billy Eichner

  36. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >these gay uncle toms trying to impress edgy/misc/ teenagers

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >if you don't like shitty gay films or their tired attempt at tearing down gays who don't assimilate, you must be an uncle tom
      way to prove the point, moron.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Anyone who uses that uncle Tom term is a moronic homosexual leftist that should die

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >be moronic leftist
          >use racist term to gatekeep who's allowed to be considered a "valid" member of a marginalized community
          >screech about inclusion and freedom of choice on twitter
          yeah they're not the most self-aware either

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            If they were self-aware they wouldn't be leftists

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      why yes, I am homosexual and I'm absolutely disgusted by public homosexuals and I constantly spread homophobia and post studies and evidence encouraging disgust and hatred of homosexuals.
      How could you tell?

  37. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    How is Sarasota fileld with such fricking homosexual smarmy moron leftists. I wonder what these people look like

    https://www.reddit.com/r/sarasota/comments/xsv2a2/to_the_people_of_sarasota/

    Herrrr derr stop complaining (yet complains worse than the people who are unhappy they just survived a bad hurricane)

  38. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The demand for gayness isn't as big as the supply.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Thought that little frosted mini wheat was Spongebob with HIV/AIDS

  39. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    This is going to kill homosexual films for at least the next 20 years.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      God I hope so

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Of course it won’t

  40. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    BALD IM KINO

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >isnt bald
      >isnt kino
      wtf

    • 2 years ago
      single white female

      why is he holding his bro like that?

  41. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Dahmer
    Mega gay, super success

    >Bros
    Mega gay, a flop

    Why?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      People would rather see serial killer shit than 2 moronic fake gay gays fricking each other for 90mins

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        As far as I understand, most of the cast is actually gay

  42. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Hey white boy, why your apartment stink so much?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Hey black boy why are your neighborhoods such full of garbage and infested with scumbags

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >it must be the corpses

  43. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Straightbros, we won.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Hot

  44. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Bros GETS AIDS and DIES at the box office
    Gee these titles are getting kinda crazy

  45. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >box office mojo article saying bros flopped
    >needs to dance around the fact nobody wanted to see an overtly gay romcom
    >"ummm maybe comedy is a dead genre...."
    BOM has has always had the most moronic takes

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >nobody wanted to see an overtly gay romcom
      maybe if it wasn't complete garbage

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        B-b-b-but anon it has a 90+ cinema score!!!

  46. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    i've dated men
    i've dated women
    i honestly prefer being with a guy

  47. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    What if this was the cast?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Then a running joke would be that the buff guy is the bottom and the twink has a monster energy can penis

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        No problem with the shorter guy having a big or bigger dick, just for me personally it wouldn't be hot if he was the top. Maybe because I'm straight I prefer the roles to be traditional.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I'd watch that.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          these two should be crucified.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            post body

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              doesn't make them any less gay, Cinemaphilegay

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Now without the shorts

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                it was a trick all along

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          The right dude looks like that one gun youtuber

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        that's how they try to ruin it now. hate that shit.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        kino

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I love when gay porn subverts expectations like this

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >twink has a monster energy can penis
        hung traps and big dick femboys aren't even gay, just wonders of the world. Although I prefer them fricking and breeding women, even varbie dolls.

    • 2 years ago
      single white female

      Intercrural sex is the only form of gay sex that is acceptable, and it has to be between an older man and a young twink. otherwise, its absolutely degenerate.

  48. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It's Brover

  49. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Looks like a homosexual movie

  50. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Peter and Paul are in a throuple with Marty.
    >Bobby wins an award for "best cis male gay man".
    >After a brief argument, Bobby goes to Aaron’s apartment to hook up, but it’s mostly them kissing while two other guys go down on Aaron.
    Totally relatable and not at all degenerate, guys!

  51. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Why didn't the Elegy Beaty community turn out to see it?

  52. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
  53. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >American institute of bisexuality
      How horrifying

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        *How ghastly!

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >The American Institute of Bisexuality (AIB) is a charity founded on July 23, 1998, by sex researcher, psychiatrist and bisexual rights activist Fritz Klein
        >Klein was born in Vienna, Austria, to Orthodox israeli parents. He and his family fled to New York City when he was a child, to escape antisemitism.[2]
        huh, weird

        • 2 years ago
          single white female

          dont ask questions goy

  54. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    its heartening to know that their social engineering doesnt work, and that the state of globohomosexual mirrors how the USSR was in the 80's

  55. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Brosbros
    Cant believe this day came so soon kek

  56. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >91% critic score
    >92% audience score
    Might go see it if it's this good. Wish I had a boyfriend to see it with me.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      i'll buy the tickets u buy the lube (and i wont complain if you're too cheap to buy it 😉 )

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Maybe you'll see another guy sitting alone there :3

    • 2 years ago
      single white female

      every gay's you boyfriend.
      you can just all meet at the movie and jerk each other off.
      homosexual

  57. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    what was the budget?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      22 million, pretty cheap for movies these days tbh

  58. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Shocking. Who could’ve seen this coming
    >seriously goys! EVERYONE ABSOLUTELY LOVES gayS!! I’LL WAGER 70 MILLION DOLLARS ON IT!!

  59. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    it just doesn't look funny

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      god damn i love himbo twunks

  60. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    What is Armond White’s fricking problem?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Based gayBlack person Armond doing the reverse buck-breaking.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >As Hollywood displays its ongoing artistic bankruptcy, we see the people responsible for this glut of unoriginality for what they really are morally and politically. That was the case last week with Olivia Wilde’s Don’t Worry Darling and now with Judd Apatow’s production of the Billy Eichner project Bros. The latest in Apatow’s series of vulgar introductory films (Knocked Up for Seth Rogan, Trainwreck for Amy Schumer, The King of Staten Island for Pete Davidson), Bros defends stunt-provocateur Eichner’s singularly hideous personality.

      >Bros sells the only thing Eichner’s got to offer: his political identity as a white gay male. It has been the media’s excuse for tolerating his unapologetic boorishness as shtick. You may never have heard of Eichner, one of those minor cable-TV aberrations (shows such as Billy on the Street, in which he accosted passersby) who was marketed into Hollywood acceptance as a “comedian.” In the gratingly unfunny Bros, Eichner plays Bobby Leiber, a podcaster — which explains how an obnoxious blowhard makes a living, a podcaster being tantamount to a cultural influencer.

      >Bobby gets an employment upgrade to curate an LGBTQ museum, which sets him up for another social gain: a romantic partner to certify his status. Goofy, smug, and insecure Bobby meets Aaron (Luke Macfarlane), a smiley, straight-appearing stereotype chosen for the film’s pretense of redefining all masculinity.

      >Through the title “Bros,” Hollywood — already a distinct political enclave — markets a protected social group. The film’s proper title could have been cultish –“Girls,” “Queens,” “Ladies,” even “Guys” — except that Apatow and director Nicholas Stoller (co-writing with Eichner) presume to instruct the public on its outmoded ideas of manhood. They want credit for being neither homophobic nor heteronormative (although the lamest jokes ridicule the latter). Witless Hollywood needs to flaunt its progressivism.

      >In those terms, Bros looks like a landmark, but not for its content (despite reviewers dutifully repeating the film’s dishonest sales pitch that it’s Hollywood’s first openly gay rom-com). Fact is, Bros is notable only for its surrounding context, a cultural low-water mark.

      >At a time when the only American who cannot offer a definition of a male homosexual is probably the disingenuous Ketanji Brown Jackson, Apatow, Stoller, and Eichner deal in the deliberate confusion of today’s sexual-equity circus — which derived from Hollywood liberalism as much as from the old Human Rights Campaign, now warped into the leading trans-activism organization.

      >The context in which Bros is released as a major studio project is the trans sexualization now threatening children, gender roles, social privilege, and political preference. In this light, Bros presents a fairly mild version of Eichner’s street harangues. The scene of Bobby leaving Aaron to a sexual threesome is like a safe, pre-monkeypox, Disney-certified orgy. The erotic tension in the Jackass movies is more daring.

      >Armond White confirmed for not having the guts to say it

  61. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    4.8 million
    Honestly sounds high.
    A bet a lot of people bought tickets not knowing it was a gay show

  62. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >As Hollywood displays its ongoing artistic bankruptcy, we see the people responsible for this glut of unoriginality for what they really are morally and politically. That was the case last week with Olivia Wilde’s Don’t Worry Darling and now with Judd Apatow’s production of the Billy Eichner project Bros. The latest in Apatow’s series of vulgar introductory films (Knocked Up for Seth Rogan, Trainwreck for Amy Schumer, The King of Staten Island for Pete Davidson), Bros defends stunt-provocateur Eichner’s singularly hideous personality.

    >Bros sells the only thing Eichner’s got to offer: his political identity as a white gay male. It has been the media’s excuse for tolerating his unapologetic boorishness as shtick. You may never have heard of Eichner, one of those minor cable-TV aberrations (shows such as Billy on the Street, in which he accosted passersby) who was marketed into Hollywood acceptance as a “comedian.” In the gratingly unfunny Bros, Eichner plays Bobby Leiber, a podcaster — which explains how an obnoxious blowhard makes a living, a podcaster being tantamount to a cultural influencer.

    >Bobby gets an employment upgrade to curate an LGBTQ museum, which sets him up for another social gain: a romantic partner to certify his status. Goofy, smug, and insecure Bobby meets Aaron (Luke Macfarlane), a smiley, straight-appearing stereotype chosen for the film’s pretense of redefining all masculinity.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Through the title “Bros,” Hollywood — already a distinct political enclave — markets a protected social group. The film’s proper title could have been cultish –“Girls,” “Queens,” “Ladies,” even “Guys” — except that Apatow and director Nicholas Stoller (co-writing with Eichner) presume to instruct the public on its outmoded ideas of manhood. They want credit for being neither homophobic nor heteronormative (although the lamest jokes ridicule the latter). Witless Hollywood needs to flaunt its progressivism.

      >In those terms, Bros looks like a landmark, but not for its content (despite reviewers dutifully repeating the film’s dishonest sales pitch that it’s Hollywood’s first openly gay rom-com). Fact is, Bros is notable only for its surrounding context, a cultural low-water mark.

      >At a time when the only American who cannot offer a definition of a male homosexual is probably the disingenuous Ketanji Brown Jackson, Apatow, Stoller, and Eichner deal in the deliberate confusion of today’s sexual-equity circus — which derived from Hollywood liberalism as much as from the old Human Rights Campaign, now warped into the leading trans-activism organization.

      >The context in which Bros is released as a major studio project is the trans sexualization now threatening children, gender roles, social privilege, and political preference. In this light, Bros presents a fairly mild version of Eichner’s street harangues. The scene of Bobby leaving Aaron to a sexual threesome is like a safe, pre-monkeypox, Disney-certified orgy. The erotic tension in the Jackass movies is more daring.

      >Context being everything, Bros matches the announcement by the producer of the James Bond series: “Bond is evolving as men are evolving.” But the attempt to normalize Eichner by imitating the rom-com formula is what makes Bros bogus. Apatow and Stoller can’t domesticate their unruly pet, but they also lack the honesty to admit that Eichner’s insufferable bachelorhood actually exemplifies his own unevolved sense of entitlement — typical Hollywood narcissism.

      >More context: The rom-com premise of treating gay males like Norah Ephron clichés narrows gay life to the Buttigieg, Obergefell standard. In the same year that Terence Davies’s Benediction boldly revealed the heartache behind gay male sexual self-sufficiency, Bros proffers trivializing comedy. This insults those gay filmmakers outside Hollywood, from Bruce La Bruce to Patrik-Ian Polk to James Sweeney, who struggled to honestly express their wit and acknowledge our common sexuality.

      >Bros pretends to satirize Bobby’s fear of commitment, but the contempt Eichner showed to his on-the-street video victims has not been transformed into charm. Eichner bluffs his way through rom-com skits, unlike real actors Richard Burton and Rex Harrison putting themselves on the line in Staircase, the remarkably empathetic 1969 comedy revealing the depths of an aged gay couple’s unsettled needs and desires.

      >The hateful museum-board-meeting scene mocking homosexual privilege (Bisexuals vs. Lesbians) is a disgraceful update of those Gay 101 lessons that writer Paul Rudnick provided in Jeffrey and In & Out. And nothing in Bros compares to that moment in James Sweeney’s brilliant Straight Up when Rory (Katie Findlay) observed: “I have a theory that Millennials overshare because we’re the most godless generation, so that’s why we confess everything on social media. It’s sort of our way to cling to some kind of permanence.”

      >Apatow and Stoller can’t make a star of resentful, hang-dog Eichner. The real goal is to substantiate their industry’s agenda regarding sex, identity, and social position. (“Gay men are my jam,” boasts a moronic straight-girl character, one among the film’s celebrity-endorsement cameos by Debra Messing, Kristen Chenoweth, and Harvey Fierstein.) Stoller shows no interest in sensuality as broached in Straight Up or that Julián Hernández makes vivid in his romantic new short Dos entre muchos (Two Among Many). The fake rom-com of Bros makes light of gay male sensibility. It’s crude and dislikable.

      He really is the king of Cinemaphile.

  63. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Through the title “Bros,” Hollywood — already a distinct political enclave — markets a protected social group. The film’s proper title could have been cultish –“Girls,” “Queens,” “Ladies,” even “Guys” — except that Apatow and director Nicholas Stoller (co-writing with Eichner) presume to instruct the public on its outmoded ideas of manhood. They want credit for being neither homophobic nor heteronormative (although the lamest jokes ridicule the latter). Witless Hollywood needs to flaunt its progressivism.

    >In those terms, Bros looks like a landmark, but not for its content (despite reviewers dutifully repeating the film’s dishonest sales pitch that it’s Hollywood’s first openly gay rom-com). Fact is, Bros is notable only for its surrounding context, a cultural low-water mark.

    >At a time when the only American who cannot offer a definition of a male homosexual is probably the disingenuous Ketanji Brown Jackson, Apatow, Stoller, and Eichner deal in the deliberate confusion of today’s sexual-equity circus — which derived from Hollywood liberalism as much as from the old Human Rights Campaign, now warped into the leading trans-activism organization.

    >The context in which Bros is released as a major studio project is the trans sexualization now threatening children, gender roles, social privilege, and political preference. In this light, Bros presents a fairly mild version of Eichner’s street harangues. The scene of Bobby leaving Aaron to a sexual threesome is like a safe, pre-monkeypox, Disney-certified orgy. The erotic tension in the Jackass movies is more daring.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >The context in which Bros is released as a major studio project is the trans sexualization now threatening children, gender roles, social privilege, and political preference. In this light, Bros presents a fairly mild version of Eichner’s street harangues.
      This is also my problem with Everything Everywhere. A bland homosexual couple is not transgressive in 2022. It's not very relatable to me that this is what the films think is pushing the boundaries of the culture. It's the equivalent of a movie being made about interracial marriage and wanting kudos for being daring and brave. I've never heard of this guy, but he seems based.

  64. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Context being everything, Bros matches the announcement by the producer of the James Bond series: “Bond is evolving as men are evolving.” But the attempt to normalize Eichner by imitating the rom-com formula is what makes Bros bogus. Apatow and Stoller can’t domesticate their unruly pet, but they also lack the honesty to admit that Eichner’s insufferable bachelorhood actually exemplifies his own unevolved sense of entitlement — typical Hollywood narcissism.

    >More context: The rom-com premise of treating gay males like Norah Ephron clichés narrows gay life to the Buttigieg, Obergefell standard. In the same year that Terence Davies’s Benediction boldly revealed the heartache behind gay male sexual self-sufficiency, Bros proffers trivializing comedy. This insults those gay filmmakers outside Hollywood, from Bruce La Bruce to Patrik-Ian Polk to James Sweeney, who struggled to honestly express their wit and acknowledge our common sexuality.

    >Bros pretends to satirize Bobby’s fear of commitment, but the contempt Eichner showed to his on-the-street video victims has not been transformed into charm. Eichner bluffs his way through rom-com skits, unlike real actors Richard Burton and Rex Harrison putting themselves on the line in Staircase, the remarkably empathetic 1969 comedy revealing the depths of an aged gay couple’s unsettled needs and desires.

    >The hateful museum-board-meeting scene mocking homosexual privilege (Bisexuals vs. Lesbians) is a disgraceful update of those Gay 101 lessons that writer Paul Rudnick provided in Jeffrey and In & Out. And nothing in Bros compares to that moment in James Sweeney’s brilliant Straight Up when Rory (Katie Findlay) observed: “I have a theory that Millennials overshare because we’re the most godless generation, so that’s why we confess everything on social media. It’s sort of our way to cling to some kind of permanence.”

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Is it actually good? Any more gay kino?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Yes and above all it's actually entertaining
        Happy Together is one of the best but saddest gay films ever made
        Terrence Davies has made like four good gay films
        Tom of Finland for obvious reasons
        Gods Own Country
        basically anything Armond writes about on his OUT account https://www.out.com/armond-white
        Which they cancelled for him not fellating certain films

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          doesn't armond cum every time snyder makes a reference to christianity in his movies? how does he reconcile being fudgepacker with that?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            because christianity isn't anti gay and the whole narrative was invented by german pedophiles in the clergy so they could redirect the mob's hatred away from them towards gays

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Bruce La Bruce
      Armond was a degenerate all along, go figure.

  65. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Apatow and Stoller can’t make a star of resentful, hang-dog Eichner. The real goal is to substantiate their industry’s agenda regarding sex, identity, and social position. (“Gay men are my jam,” boasts a moronic straight-girl character, one among the film’s celebrity-endorsement cameos by Debra Messing, Kristen Chenoweth, and Harvey Fierstein.) Stoller shows no interest in sensuality as broached in Straight Up or that Julián Hernández makes vivid in his romantic new short Dos entre muchos (Two Among Many). The fake rom-com of Bros makes light of gay male sensibility. It’s crude and dislikable.

  66. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    As an occasional homosexual I have literally zero interest in seeing a bunch of flaming homos prancing around in my movies.

  67. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >LGBT movie bombs at the box office
    Great, I can’t wait for all of us to be called homophobes for not seeing this surprisingly competently made movie

  68. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    We love asian men here
    If the movie was asian bl it would be a box office hit

  69. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    when the frick will they get the message that gay shit doesn't sell

  70. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Why did this fail butt Call Me by Your Name suckseeded?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      CMBYN has two cute leads with chemistry. Bros has you believe a 10/10 Cinemaphileizen would be interested in the main gay. Not believable.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Call Me By Your Name is what horny girls imagine gay people as (cute, androgynous boy + older, handsome man). This is what girls get off to, it's why they read BL manga. Pic related basically.

      Bros is what gay people are actually like. Two hairy, 30-year old guys making out. Completely alien to girls.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Bro has one of the worst actors alive though
        It'd be like trying to make a movie where Adam Friedland was the super charismatic lead

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Horny girls have infinitely better taste than gay men then. This is yet another example of 2D > 3D.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Liking strong hairy men is unironically less degenerate than being into borderline trannies (that also haooen to look like kids)

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            I don't care about real life anymore.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            the more bi i become the less i dislike androgyny and appreciate distinct gender signifiers like huge breasts and curvy hips/waists contrasting with strong, muscled torsos

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >Horny girls have infinitely better taste than gay men then.
          Nope.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Straight women drawing straight men is the same left image. Women just have different tastes.

  71. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I want a dick inside me but I'm feeling insecure rn because of my pimples

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Don't be gay

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Can't stop

  72. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    How does a movie like this flop with 5 million? How much money can something like this possibly take to make? Do directors just have no fricking idea how to budget or do anything?

  73. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    This would make money in America is the gaybros were Black folk

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      They already made brokebuck mountain nobody watched it they just gave it a lot of awards

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I watched it, it was good

  74. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    That ads for this movie are the most revolting I've seen for any film ever.

    Gay films have succeeded - Brokeback, In & Out, for example.

    This one looks so soullessly priapic it's neither funny nor dramatic.

  75. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    the fact that it got more than 0 dollar alone is already a problem, when will scientists admit that the lgbt is mental illness?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      trump lost

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        obsessed

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >suddenly burger's politic
        the absolute state of amerimutts, no wonder the rainbow cult can control your people

  76. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >it is the year 2030
    >being gay is mainstream and boring, completely mundane
    >your child doesn't have a "dad, I'm gay now!" phase because it isn't even considered shocking or rebellious any more
    >sexbots basically wipe out the entire "prison gay" population (incels turning themselves gay or into trannies)
    Straightbros... we're going home

  77. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Gods own country bros, our gaykino reins supreme once again

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      In Josh we trust!

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >reins

  78. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    A film targeted at the tiny minority of ass-bandits and the only "non-gay" audience who would see it encounter this shit on a day to day basis because they live in San Francisco flops. Who would have thought?

  79. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Gaybros of Cinemaphile, is it fair to say Billy Eichner is the Amy Schumer of gay men? Because that's how he appears to me.

    And, if so, no fricking shit it flopped.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Yes he's ugly and not funny but they keep trying to put him in everything.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Eichner is worse. Eichner is aggressively loud and is inserted into everything. Feels like I never watch a show or turn on the TV and see her yet Eichner will take bit parts in anything where he always plays the loudest and most obnoxious person they can write him to be.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Eichner gives me psychotic, evil vibes somehow. (not because he's a israelite)

  80. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    This was a good thread gay bros

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      So we all agree it's a bad idea to create content around a niche group?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        No that's not a bad idea, that's how all great content is created, you just have to hyper focus on who you're trying to cater to, not half ass it and blindly appeal to "the mainstream".

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Sure, they probably should've made it more accessible to other groups of people like more successful gay shows

  81. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I watched a comedy on Netflix recently with NPH about him fricking a bunch of dudes after his boyfriend leaves him. It was pretty kewl. Won't go sit in a theater and watch a full length movie about it though.

  82. 2 years ago
    single white female

    will while use this as evidence at the show trial

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *