Can you believe it only took a few slides of AI slop to sink this entire movie's momentum?

Can you believe it only took a few slides of AI slop to sink this entire movie's momentum?

CRIME Shirt $21.68

Black Rifle Cuck Company, Conservative Humor Shirt $21.68

CRIME Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    what movie?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Don't care, the possessed girl is cute.

      Late night with the Devil

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Evil shit

      Some evil trash. It has smoking

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    why did they even announce that they did it? with the massive pushback against using AI-content in commercial capacities why did they even think it would be received positively?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      they didn't announce it. They responded to people complaining

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >why did they even announce that they did it?
      They didn't; someone who watched it pointed it out.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      They didn't. They listened, and that's what no one did.

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It doesn't really matter. I am still going to see it, but who cares if it is successful or not?

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It wasn't worth it and they had the time to remove it knowing that the entire industry went on strike over this shit. It was a monumentally dumb decision.

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    What momentum?

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    OOF

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Theres hate in my heart for these insipid c**ts

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      they are literally getting mad about three still graphics that appear on the screen for few seconds

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        no ones actually mad or seething he just said people should be mad but arent because you'll eat the slop regardless, like your tofu steak and bug burgers, like the good little boy you are

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >artroony trying to call other people slop eaters
          lmao

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Once you accept it, it will be used more and more. Sure in this it's just three images but letting this slide will ALWAYS lead to more and more and more use of it

        The slippery slope is real. Look at what happened after legalizing gay marriage. At first it was just gay marriage which is no big deal. But now men are cheating on women's sports and using the bathroom with vulnerable girls.

        Accepting the least of something will always lead to grander overall acceptance.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >womp womp
      god I hate these fricks down to their cores. why do they speak like this ?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        It was a meme several years ago. Politicians were using it a lot.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Listen.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Dunno anon, but now that the dust has settled, who will play xer in the biopic?
        I'll be kino iregardless

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I hope AI kills off "artists" for good.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >There's AI all over this
      it's like three graphics that are onscreen for a combined total of about 40 seconds max

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >There's AI all over this in the cutaways and the "We'll be right back" network messages
        Why did you remove most of the text? Can't you come up with an argument without being disingenuous?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          You're fighting a losing battle.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Womp womp

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      To be fair, AI is about the only way to create the look of old analog graphics without bothering the single 100 year old man that maintains the ONLY functional system remaining on planet Earth.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        thats not true at all and that image was most likely a clean, new looking image before they put it through a filter afterwards but were still too moronic to notice everything wrong with it

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Ah, I thought they were talking about classic motion graphics from that time period. Those you can't even make look convincing with CG (and only a trained AI could mimic).

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Oh, so now they think "slippery slope" is an actual thing. Imagine that.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Luddite homosexualry will never win

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/2duQf3j.jpg

      Can you believe it only took a few slides of AI slop to sink this entire movie's momentum?

      How is this different than having an intern watch old tv shows or google some tv cards and creating a new one based on those? Its literally the same shit the AI does.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Because you're paying at least one less person.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          I doubt the director himself prompted the image. Someone with a salary did (he should have also fixed manually the fingers, or tried again until it got good enough).
          But whats the reasoning with you are paying someone? Should they transport the gear in backpacks so they could pay 40 people more instead of a trucker and 2 guys?
          Should they stop wifi so they could use messengers like in the old time?

          This is incredibly moronic. And I dont even like AI most of times. But this is exactly a fair use of it. To make a generic image based on stuff that exists already.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >This is incredibly moronic. And I dont even like AI most of times. But this is exactly a fair use of it.
            it's not moronic. most likely some artist would have gotten paid to design those frames if it weren't for AI. artists are complaining about AI for the same rational reason farmhands complained about tractors and other machinery becoming widely used in farming. back then there were still obvious "next jobs" to move on to. a human still had tremendous intrinsic value as basic needs were barely being met for everyone except the equivalent of a modern billionaire. now? all basic needs are met even for the poor and most people are already working BULLSHIT JOBS. it's out of sheer decadence that we still have enough capital circulating around to keep most people feeling like their effort is rewarded, but the median person's wealth has been eroding for decades and now AI is accelerating that process hard. it threatens the end of most of the demand for human workers, in an economic system that requires every human to be a worker or be a cursed "loser". logically if nothing is done about it almost all people will slip into welfare, too much time and no hope to ever improve your situation, forming gangs, taking drugs, joining cults etc.
            at one point 90% of the population was working in agriculture. now it's single digits, if even that. at a later point knowing how to operate basic computer programs got you a highly paid career. now you need a degree, prior experience and decent interviewing skills just to earn an unremarkable wage and these jobs are already disappearing. even the very people developing the AI have to figure out what to do with their lives 5-10 years from now. technology is transforming the job market at a rate that is dangerous to the whole system.

            I'm still conflicted about what legislation we need to slow down the takeover of entire job fields by AI but can it be denied that we need some ASAP?

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >I'm still conflicted about what legislation we need to slow down the takeover of entire job fields by AI but can it be denied that we need some ASAP?
              None, just get a real job.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Good, a movie crew should be as small as possible

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Right, so fire the artists, and hire more middle managers.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Right

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        You don't understand. AI scanning art to create art is totally like heckin' theft even though that's what all artists who have ever existed have done.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        because the intern would've done a better job

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      AI is going to free us from pozzed Hollywood shit and it terrifies them.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        the pozzed Hollywood shit does not originate from contracted artists or tradespeople at the bottom of the industry hierarchy. the people who make it into the credits somewhere before or after CGI Pajeet are not the ones ruining the medium.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          This right here, the artisans like prop makers, camera operators, graphic designers, set builders and even some CGI outfits are quality people who have passion in making the dreams of film come true. The problems with the writers, actors directors producers and a bunch of the beurocrats behind the scenes making everything worse

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Oh, so now they think "slippery slope" is an actual thing. Imagine that.

      Isn't the complete lack of awareness and utter disregard of logic by leftists impressive?
      Remember the whole "horse paste" thing? And how they were telling roasties to eat horse abortion pills just a few weeks later?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I don't get it, how can you even tell or care that a title card is AI? It's just words on a screen

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        The figures are all fricked up and have random bits sticking out of them, and also there are indistinct blobs that don't look like anything, because the movie was produced two years ago so the AI images are even more janky.

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >satanic movie
    >uses satanic anti-human technology
    >this surprises anyone

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >moron describes everything he doesn't like as "satanic"
      I am indeed not surprised

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Words that I don't like don't actually mean anything
        >You are moronic for using words that I don't like

        Relativistic moron.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Tell everyone how computer chips summon demons, moronic frogposter.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        That's the fricking theme of the movie, sorry you were molested by a priest.

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Why use AI?

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It literally didn’t. You just made constant threads because you’re butthurt you can’t find photoshop work in palookaville.

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    If only he called up his buddy James and got Mike Matei to draw the title cards instead.

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Pic?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      A picture of a skeleton with fricked up fingers appears on screen for a few seconds, the movie is canceled.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        They could have easily tried harder. You can fix that with ai in seconds.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous
      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        They could have easily licensed cheap stock art vs. that AI abomination that they ended up actually using. The laziness and lack of effort is what gets me the most. Not one person took a look at that and said hold up, that looks like a steaming pile of dogshit? Anyway it's not nearly as low budget as you think. Look up the producers of the movie.

        Who cares

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Artists need to realize how much pain in the ass it is to deal with. A simple image like this would take over a month to get.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          This, and not only a month but at least a dozen whiny emails exchanging feedback and drafts

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Artists need to realize how much pain in the ass it is to deal with. A simple image like this would take over a month to get.

            I literally work with an artist as part of my job (he does character designs and merch designs) and it usually only takes him a day or two for a draft and is very receptive to notes, you people are morons

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          This, and not only a month but at least a dozen whiny emails exchanging feedback and drafts

          >and i base this on absolutely nothing

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Leave it to autists to make a mountain out of a goddamn mole hill.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        wow that looks really fricking bad. Would it have been that hard to just draw your own version of this?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          it's a movie with a limited budget which was in production way before the hollywood strike even begun, i'm sure producers just thought in saving a few bucks by generating an image that shows up for 5 seconds in the movie. it's not worth going to war over it.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            AI slop is actually visible on stage anytime the show logo is on screen. It's just not the title cards.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Big deal.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Pay a graphic designer 500 dollars to make this
        >sink your entire movie with an AI controversy
        Damned if you do damned if you dont

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I'm certain you could pay someone on one of those sites like Fiver to paint that for you, and it wouldn't even be pricy. Why even risk the bad press?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Product movies are constantly looking for ways to cut corners

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Some of these guys work for pennies. It's not even worth the bad press to risk using AI right now. I don't get it.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Plus, struggling artists will "work for exposure", and a movie is exposure. You could probably have someone do it for free, if you're that desperate.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        doesnt even look 70s. looks like some faux retro vaporwave crap

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        this is like some dall-e 2 shit lol at movies taking so long to make (a year?) you're using a generation back tech which looks laughable

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I hate leftists so I mostly hate artists so by virtue of that I support AI art

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Ruins your career over 2 seconds of a fake AI poster as a gag
    KWAB

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I was excited for it.
    AI means I'm never paying for your movie. I'm just gonna watch on Shudder since I already have it for Joe Bob and Creepshow.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I had to bail after they started holding the hat out for BLM in 2020. Joe Bob’s kind of shit now anyway, because it feels like Shudder is constantly passing him notes to add “celebrity” guests and make Darcy his co-host, completely missing the point of why we watched MonsterVision back in the day. The 24-hour marathon was peak though.

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Did true detective doing this cause this much of a stink?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      They got a pass since theyre all DEI aligned

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The showrunner came up with some bullshit explanation like, "Uh actually, it was on purpose, the guy is such a loser he spends time in his room creating fake AI generated posters because um, he's such a white male chud incel shut in loser".

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      They were too busy calling critics of the show racist misogynists to notice.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        The showrunner came up with some bullshit explanation like, "Uh actually, it was on purpose, the guy is such a loser he spends time in his room creating fake AI generated posters because um, he's such a white male chud incel shut in loser".

        They got a pass since theyre all DEI aligned

        I suppose I also want to know the difference in budgets between productions. Because I understand how useful ai can be as a tool for no budget productions, but I also understand and empathize with graphic artists that could’ve used the handful of dollars this would’ve been for them. Shudder using it is a meh to me, but a big budget HBO show using it in a far more pathetic and egregious manner is actually idiotic and short sighted

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          There's plenty of decent artists that would've probably done this for exposure bucks if the producers really wanted to be that cheap.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I know man it’s a shitty thing they did and I wish they just fricking hired a guy as well. This is a massive discussion that needs to continue to happen I’m appalled by attacks on artisans like this, but should we discount the whole of the movie simply because of a misstep like this. I’m honestly astonished they didn’t get someone to fix the card in photoshop after it was made to make this not quite as obvious

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              It's just such a ridiculously unnecessary own-goal. Like, a few hundred bucks to a real artist and everyone would be fricking psyched about this movie and the whole shit storm would be avoided.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              You sound like an artist scared of AI. As someone who is not I don't give a shit about movies using it. Especially such a minor thing like this.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                It's just such a ridiculously unnecessary own-goal. Like, a few hundred bucks to a real artist and everyone would be fricking psyched about this movie and the whole shit storm would be avoided.

                I’m not, I just don’t want an entire career to die simply because of greedy producers but I also understand how useful a tool AI can be. As I said when I entered this thread I want major corporations to be held accountable for this just as much as I want smaller production companies to. I found the AI art found in true detective far more egregious than this and normies mostly swept it under the rug

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              That's the other thing, if you're going to use AI, at least spend some time cleaning it up so it's not so blatantly obvious.

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Nope, still hyped.

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It's so funny that Twitter morons think that a small-budget horror/thriller would have hired an illustrator to make bespoke artwork for those shots rather than just find a royalty-free image and frick around a bit in photoshop.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      They could have easily licensed cheap stock art vs. that AI abomination that they ended up actually using. The laziness and lack of effort is what gets me the most. Not one person took a look at that and said hold up, that looks like a steaming pile of dogshit? Anyway it's not nearly as low budget as you think. Look up the producers of the movie.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Nooooo you can't just buy a car, you need to build your own wagon from scratch
        The tech is here to stay. It's not going away. It's easy and cheap and convenient. Sure it lacks a lot of fine-tuning that an artisan product would have, but in this context it really doesn't seem like a big deal. It's not like this took a really valuable job from an illustrator, if the tech didn't exist they'd have just found cheap/free art somewhere on the Internet anyway

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          I'm not anti-AI. The complete lack of effort bothers me more. I know the tools back when they generated the image weren't what they are today, but c'mon. It looks like total shit. You can't put that in your movie.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            It's a low budget found footage movie, and period pieces are notoriously expensive. It's perfectly functional for how they use it in the movie

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              It's not that fricking low budget. Stop pretending like this is a $10,000 Kickstarter project. It's got goddamn UAE oil money funding. There's plenty of cheap, licensable stock art that looks 1000x better than the garbage they went with. Lazy, low effort slop.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                It’s fricking hilarious that you’re this mad.
                I’m going to buy the dvd just so I can jerk off to the parts that are busting your buttholes.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I just find the disingenuous arguments people like you put forth lazy as frick. I'm not even some anti-AI zealot. But I wasn't going to see the movie either way. If you like it and want to watch it, great. Hope you enjoy it.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >oy vey, do you know how much it costs to run photoshop for ten minutes?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Small budget
      Fricking lmao, look up who's producing it.
      Also for a TV board, Cinemaphile still thinks "small budget" means it was made with 1200 dollars and a couple favours. Your shittiest run of the mill movie to play in theathers nowadays will NOT cost less than 4 million.

      Dinner with Andre, a movie from fricking 87 that is entirely filmed in 2 camera angles inside a small room with 2 actors, one of which is the director, costed 500.000. They could pay an artist 80 dolars for a still lol

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >small-budget
      No, it fricking isn't. Small budget is indie trash that will show at festivals and maybe a theater local to the crew then go on tubi

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    does anyone have screenshots of the AI scene? where did they use it?

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    They've also got a fricking 2019 jack o lantern from Costco in a movie that's ostensibly set in 1977. Low effort slop.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >oh no movies are fake and cheap
      Get a life.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >oh no, a horror movie that is set on a cheesy 70s nightshow talkshowset uses items that are not handcrafted by WETA

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    WHO THE FRICK
    I MEAN THE FRICK
    CARES IF A PIECE OF COMMERCIAL ART IS MADE BY SOME FRICKING MEAT BAG OR A FRICKING AI???
    I don't give a frick about lefty whiners
    I don't give a frick about unironic corporatists cheering for the death of human art
    I just.... DON'T CARE!!!
    I can't fricking draw. I can't fricking use Photoshop. It has no fricking effect on me or my life.

    so just shut the frick up and frick the frick off with your incessant whining and culture warring about popular thing you saw on reddit already.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >WHO THE FRICK
      >I MEAN THE FRICK
      >CARES IF A PIECE OF COMMERCIAL ART IS MADE BY SOME FRICKING MEAT BAG OR A FRICKING AI???
      The meat bags who create art, for one

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        ok, so no-one important

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          the dumb, lazy slop coming from TV and movie studios is only going to get dumber and lazier if you replace actual artists with AI, you know that right?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            nta but I haven't watched anything produced after 2012 so this doesn't affect me at all.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >Yeah, I just post on a movie/tv discussion site every day
              >I haven’t watched anything in over a decade
              >But I’m not wasting my life because I’m calling out hypocrisy in the media, and that’s a worthy past time
              Favorite movie?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >I haven’t watched anything in over a decade
                Not what I said at all, but your absolute butt-devastation of a reply has made me smile.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            yeah, luckily for us there's nothing lazy going on in tv and movie studios at the moment

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Starving artists who think they're entitled to your money.

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    When does this come out?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      In theaters today, hits streaming in a month.

  22. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Why is THIS (the sort of thing people were touting as a good use of AI) what's blasting people's asses whilst Marvel used AI for the intro sequence to that Secret Invasion show that would have been worth millions of dollars to a VFX company

  23. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Why are people so pissed at artists mad about AI, it was journoscum telling truckers to learn2code not artists

  24. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Ghostwatch remains king.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Inside No. 9 also did it better too

  25. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    it's moronic, did people cry like this when CGI was debuted?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      They should have, CGI has become an absolute blight on the industry.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        no it didn't. Cgi is actually pretty great but due to survivorship bias everyone thinks it's bad. Plenty of movies have cgi but it's so good you don't see it. You only notice it when it's bad

  26. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Heh

  27. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I can tell people like OP are the ones scared of AI and are trying to make this small use of AI in the movie a huge deal when it isn't. You just want to make any movie with even a tiny amount of AI fail to scare any future film makers from using it, don't you?

  28. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I will watch it five times just to stick it to all the morons boycotting it.

  29. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Why is this image so blurry?
    Is the whole movie like that?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The seventies were a blurry time.

  30. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    ITT buttblasted "artists"

    Can't wait to watch this movie

  31. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I really don't see the big deal. It sounds like what they did was take a still image, run it thru AI to enhance its "70s aesthetic", and then they manually touched that image up even further. I mean, it's not like they used an AI to write and process entire swaths of the movie. Nobody gets pissed off about artificial digital "particle effects" in movies. The director has an image of exactly how he wants the smoke or fog in a scene to look, he uses digital technology to give it just the right look, and as long as it looks real nobody in the audience b***hes about "Hey, he didn't use real smoke!". Using AI the way this crew did to give an image a "70s feel" is really no different than using digital EQ to make the audio sound "70s" or using a Saturation/desaturation filter to make the film look "retro" like so many other period movies have done. They used AI to augment, not create. And The AI didn't replace anybody's job. back in the 90s when CGI blew up, All the practical effects and stop motion artists complained that CGI was stealing their jobs. And it did. And it also allowed for Kino that never could've been made to come into existence (LOTR, Jurassic Park, etc). AI will help vfx artists speed up their workflow. Like imagine in Pirates of The Carribean Dead Man's Chest, Instead of painstakingly animating each of Davey Jones tentacles, you can use AI to automatically generate convincing octopus-like movements for each tentacle, and then the artists can manually tweak and add whatever specific things the want into the performance.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      the image has been posted, they didn't clean anything up or start off with anything, obviously, moron. It's a shitty basic b***h generation. But it's just a gay ass movie so who gives a shit about how they made it?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >I really don't see the big deal. It sounds like what they did was take a still image, run it thru AI to enhance its "70s aesthetic", and then they manually touched that image up even further.
      They didn't do any touching up, which is why it's obviously an AI image.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Yes, Ozone is a tool that music producers use to master their music. Surprise, it has AI elements as a TOOL. So nobody fricking bats an eye because they don't even know the difference, but suddenly now they need to be keyboard warriors because MUH INTEGRITY. It doesn't matter if they didn't manually touch it up, it's not like the entire product is the result of AI. When used as a tool to compliment the hard work of people, nobody should care this much.

  32. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    i see that hivemind already decided this movie is bad wihout watching it. Late night with the devil is over party

  33. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I don't see the issue. AI art is kino

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      it's a filter, if you think that slop is great you are probably some third world pajeet or just low IQ

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I'm so glad AI is taking your job you useless homosexual. Run back to letterboxd

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous
  34. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Pay $50 to some trans weeaboo on twitter to draw something, or generate it for free in 30 seconds...hmmm

  35. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    AI is a good thing though.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >"Gender distribution across occupations reflects society's bias"
      >Women choosing (given) well-paid, cushy office jobs? Not a problem until we can identify disparate impacts that new technology poses to those occupations. Then it become a failure of society for forcing women into those endangered positions.

      It's crazy how supposed anti-wokesters cite Bloomberg as an unbiased economic journal.

  36. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >True Detective uses one AI generated poster for one frame
    >HOW FRICKING DARE HER THAT FRICKING bawd, WOMEN ARE prostituteS WHO ONLY FRICK buttholeS
    >Other people complain about blatant use of AI in a movie
    >LOL WHY ARE THESE SOIKEKS SO MAD? JUST A COUPLA SLIDES, THEY'RE SO PATHETIC, AI IS LE BASED XD

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      meds

  37. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Why didn’t they just say they did it on purpose to be subliminally uncanny and liminal analog horror which zoomers all adore

  38. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    AI defenders deserve the rope

  39. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    the films states pretty clearly that the on stage sections are are almost exactly like a demonic possession

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *