>commits war crimes

>commits war crimes

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Rape and murder is le hecking awesome if the person being raped or killed doesn't share my neo-liberal views

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      When I was a kid I knew so many WWII vets who served in Japan and Europe and they don't share those Neo-lib views either.
      In High School I worked at a nursing home at this one old ass man who served at Iwo Jima told me that he thinks all the blacks should be sent half-way back to Africa without parachutes lmao

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Sure but they weren't supposed to take prisoners in the first place.

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    He is doing it for trans women and St. Floyd though so it's okay

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >the actual state of western leftists

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      israeli propaganda like this is why we think that our war crimes were limited to this mild sort of transgression, of shooting a few prisoners that moments before were trying to kill you.
      How about US soldiers going from home to home in Germany and the Pacific raping women and girls with impunity? Sometimes mutilating them, torturing them, killing them after.
      Or fire-bombing Dresden and murdering 25,000 civilians.
      How about torturing the U-546 crew to death?

      I love how all these years later juvenile wehraboos found out about Band of Brothers and believe they can make people dislike it because it hurts their precious feelings.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >juvenile
        love it when you bioleninists throw this npc buzzword as if being braindead propaganda churning orifices is a sign of adulthood to be proud of, hilarious

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Its objectively an exploitative and ahistorical show. What they did to Sobel, Blythe and Dike was unforgivable. It's like a fanfiction of the well documented war of Easy Company where they just decided to write people in as bad guys or cowards because the intended viewer was too stupid to appreciate complex characters.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Which is why The Pacific is better.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Sometimes they didn't have the information at the time and sometimes Ambrose didn't like some people he interviewed or tried to interview like Shames.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            There is no excuse for them not looking up service records, exspecially for main characters. Blythe got a whole episode and they didn't even know he went on to fight and get decorated in Korea. Dike got painted as an inexperienced coward and he had been previously awarded medals for gallantry prior to Foy.
            It just reeks of scummyness and the need to rewrite people's contributions for entertainment.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >Blythe got a whole episode and they didn't even know he went on to fight and get decorated in Korea.
              Blithe likely fabricated large parts of his service and was photographed wearing unauthorised awards.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              The military is honestly kind of scummy when it comes to how they gossip about each other. Chances are the more demonized members of the unit would have their own opinions and stories about the others that are much less flattering. For example Sobel as far as I know never really said much about his side of the events we see, and we’ll never know if he would’ve truly been bad in the field, sometimes people demonstrate their strengths at different times. It reminds me of Generation Kill and how everyone shit on Kasem but then later many of the people that did said they saw him again later and he was a great leader, but in the show he’s treated like a complete dumbass.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Winters shat on a lot of people he had petty grievances with. He really was a c**t and was aloof form the men for decades - aside from Nixon whose family was going to give him a job.

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    israeli propaganda like this is why we think that our war crimes were limited to this mild sort of transgression, of shooting a few prisoners that moments before were trying to kill you.
    How about US soldiers going from home to home in Germany and the Pacific raping women and girls with impunity? Sometimes mutilating them, torturing them, killing them after.
    Or fire-bombing Dresden and murdering 25,000 civilians.
    How about torturing the U-546 crew to death?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >How about US soldiers going from home to home in Germany and the Pacific raping women and girls with impunity? Sometimes mutilating them, torturing them, killing them after.
      That was the Soviets
      >Or fire-bombing Dresden and murdering 25,000 civilians.
      The Brits.
      >How about torturing the U-546 crew to death?
      Seems like the crime was killing a few prisoners who very recently were trying to kill them.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Imagine feeling sympathy for literally an U boat crew
        You’d fricking hate the shit out of any submariner if you were a traditional sailor at the time, they floated around blowing shit up

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Everyone hates everyone in war. Imagine thinking that only one side tortured, mutilated, raped, stole, and acted like humans.
          Oh, I forgot, the Nazis were LE EVIL

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >they floated around blowing shit up

          Is there something I'm not understanding about Naval warfare for the past 500 years?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah the part where U boats where new, and struck without even being seen, it was a terrifying prospect, and a lot of the time they didn’t care what they targeted so long as they blew up something
            So I can perfectly understand if some sailors got a hold of a u boat crew they’d make it personal. I would, only a coping homosexual wouldn’t.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >need to torture artillery crews due to "muh indiscriminate"
              >need to torture pilots due to "muh unfair"
              >need to torture sumbariners due to "can't see you"

              Just torture people. Stop having to justify it through a lens of fair vs unfair. Is it fair to use guns against illiterate natives with bows and spears?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Most natives used guns as soon as they got their hands on them, they were primitive but not moronic anon.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                So replace it with drones vs insurgents for a modern analogy.

                The point is that any military will use every conceivable resource possible to maximize enemy casualties and minimize their own. The feelings of enemy combatants should never enter the equation.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                No, the only reason you continue to seethe and post is because you cannot control how others perceive things. Nazis were homosexuals that lost and you losers continue to seethe 80+ years later. This isn’t a real argument about ethics, continue to shit self, no one cares.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I'm not the anon that is seething about nazis and allied warcrimes. Do whatever you want to do in war.

                I was just e-girlng at the fact that submariners are considered especially hateable and deserving of torture. How reality works is that soilders decide to torture already and then justify it during/after the fact.
                >capture nazi sailors
                >torturing them because your crew is unhinged
                >someone is uneasy about it
                >"it's okay petty officer these guys were submariners"

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Lol what do you not understand about context at the time? I can understand why a 1940s sailor would really fricking hate a U boat crew, it’s not hard to understand why they’d hate them with such intensity they’d torture them. That is what I said. It’s very, very easy to understand it.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                So in the original context of the thread and the OP, why did spears gun down those Germans? Were they submariners? Were they artillery crew?

                Torture/Warcrimes happen and doesn't need a justification for it.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Dunno, I just said I can understand why people in a situation who see something like a U boat crew might get the inclination to torture them when the opportunity arises. Someone else brought up U boat torture as an allied war crime, but imo I can understand why someone might do it. They targeted anyone and anything if they thought it would cause disruption of supply. The sailors of the time would’ve absolutely despised them, and they did not restrict their targeting to military vessels. Basically asking to be tortured if they were ever caught.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >U boats where new
              They were not. Submarine warfare was very important during WWI.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          How fortunate are we that in all of recorded history, it has always been the good guys that won?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            what about when Russia didn't lose WW2?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Clearly it was both moron. Anglo-Americans hugely exaggerate the Soviet rapes and hugely downplay their own. It's something any army in enemy territory is going to do.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Dresden was a valid military target.

      Cope

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        homie the firebombs and the tactic of waiting for firetrucks to come out so they could be hit was absolutely a war crime. They couldn't get away with that in Iraq.
        I get we all want to own the nazis but don't be a moron when you do it

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        if Dresden was a valid target, then so was Birmingham.
        homosexual.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          It absolutely was, same way punching a guy in the face is a valid move, just don't start crying it's not fair when he pulls a flamethrower on you

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >How about US soldiers going from home to home in Germany and the Pacific raping women and girls with impunity?
      german girls sucking dick for pantyhoses and chocolate is not really the same as some barbarian horde terrorizing germany

      >fire-bombing Dresden and murdering 25,000 civilians
      the germans were bombing the shit out of the brits and murdered 40,000 civilians

      >How about torturing the U-546 crew to death?
      beating the shit out of the enemy for information and then shooting them in the head happens. you make it sound like they're cackling whilst applying blowtorches to the toes of the poor innocent germans

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The Nazis entered this war under the rather childish delusion that they were going to bomb everyone else, and nobody was going to bomb them. At Rotterdam, London, Warsaw, and half a hundred other places, they put their rather naive theory into operation. They sowed the wind, and now they are going to reap the whirlwind.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        GETTEM AGAIN, BOMBER!

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Britain and France started the war, after Germany went to liberate germans in Poland, after Poland, a country that did not exist for almos 100 years, started a aggression war with the soviets, lithuanians and czechs.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          You're responding to an 80 year old quote, I'm not sure Bomber Harris is that interested in your rebuttal.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >israeli propaganda like this is why we think that our war crimes were limited to this mild sort of transgression, of shooting a few prisoners that moments before were trying to kill you.
      Stop talking out your mouth Black person. israelites have no problem portraying americans as rapist violent bastards. Brad pitt was a violent rapist in fury.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      war is Hell, trannies. now kys so we can put you in a grave marked with your male name.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      does any of what you said sense if all those shit happened because israelites called the shots on those descicions?

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >hahaha gas all the Black folk israelites and chinks
    >when our time comes everyone will fear the white man
    >well kill ‘em all
    >what?! noooooo please don’t just shoot me like a dog in the street no I’m actually heckin honorable chudirino it’s just a difference of opini-ACK

  6. 1 year ago
    DO IT AGAIN BOMBER HARRIS
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      DO IT AGAIN

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    would you have survived the siege of bastogne?

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >The charges, officer?

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    They accepted cigarettes. They were going to die from cancer anyway.

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    /tv/ros why is the M1928 such a sexy fun
    Can you imagine what it's like to hold one?
    I bet they cost like 5k each and you can only find them in museums

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      A Tommy gun.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        why do they call him gun

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          That colloquialism comes from the inventor.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I know it's a tommy gun. I mean the specific 1928 variant which fixed a lot of the issues and uglyness of the other earlier variants.

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >mutt viewers clap and cheer

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It was kinda standard for airborne troops to do this. They simply couldn’t take prisoners because they’re way behind enemy lines and couldn’t let them go because their position could be revealed. Same thing happens in Saving Private Ryan with the argument over steamboat Willie. Both shows do a shit job of explaining why they end up killing prisoners.

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    What was the purpose of moving the charging handle from the top to the side?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The old models were complicated and took too long to build. The M1A1 was a simplified design. Also, there was consistency with the charging handle being on the right for other US military firearms.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      have you ever fired a gun with two hands?

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Are they ever going to make this?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You mean Memphis Belle? Or 12 O' Clock high?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Catch-22

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      already made,

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Did this actually even happen though? It's just one guy who claimed he saw it.

    The show should have left it ambiguous

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Winters stated that Speirs was alleged on one occasion to have killed six German prisoners of war with a Thompson submachine gun and that the battalion leadership must have been aware of the allegations, but chose to ignore the charges because of the pressing need to retain qualified combat leaders. Winters concluded that in today's army, Speirs would have been court-martialed and charged with atrocities, but at the time officers like Speirs were too valuable because they were not afraid to engage the enemy.

    It was a different time.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      No it wasn't, it's that same old trick of we totally wouldntdo this thing we used to do now while not actually stopping it. Same as how the CIA gets so much bullshit, things come to light lat enough people think eh I couldn't happen these days.

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >WW2
    Who cares?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >curse you grandpa you betrayed our race

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        *hits grandpa in the balls* oorah

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous
  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It's only a war crime when you lose. The winners rarely (if ever) get charged with crimes unless it's too politically charged to ignore.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      it's a fricking war not a volleyball game

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Exactly my point. War crimes that any Allied servicemen did is excused or ignored because they were the good guys and they won the war.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Do you think it's because you never investigated any of the trials of Allied servicemen? How many years have you spent, disproving your initial view? You are an expert on war crimes, right?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >servicemen
            Always a few bones of no we totally do the right thing see we punished what we swear is totally an extreme minority but oh certainly not any of our leadership did anything wrong.
            Meanwhile Tojo gets the noose for???

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Here's the truth: you don't know, because you haven't taken the time to, cause ultimately, you don't care.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >it's a fricking war not a volleyball game
        Wars still have rules homosexual, otherwise America would just agent orange everything and be done with it. Americans even have lasers that blind you instantly. You wanna fight against that?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >America would just agent orange everything and be done with it.
          We did do that. We just can't get away with it anymore because the political fallout from our voters found out US troops were exposed to it as well as international condemnation amongst the First World made it not feasible anymore.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Wars still have rules
          not anymore. if you're sitting in the trenches getting shelled there might be some rules about gas and what type of bullet a doughboy can get shot with. but modern warfare has nothing to do with raising a flag over some territory. it is all non linear warfare: an endless economic/cultural manipulation from all sides involved. wars are no longer fought with tanks and planes but with perception management and sabotage

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Then why are exploding and poisoned bullets banned? Why are chemical weapons banned?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Because the other side was using it as well and by mutual agreement we don't want to reach a war of attrition with that kind of decimation.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >The winners rarely (if ever) get charged with crimes unless it's too politically charged to ignore.

      If you're especially bold, you actually blame the losers for crimes you committed (Soviets and Katyn forest)

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    it was for the greater good

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Reminder that war crime reprisals are considered legal. So taking into account what the wehrmacht got up to I guess you can legally do whatever the frick you want to them.

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Why did Britain get involved in ww2 and why didn't Churchill accept any of Germanys' peace settlements?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      because the germans already broke every agreement made earlier and they offered peace on the condition they could invade russia.
      churchill was a fat drunken bong but not that stupid he'd trust hitler

  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Wasn't it implied this never happened and it became a myth? The story changes each time, the character is weird he's basically captain america god mode.

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    why dont you take it to the war judge

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *