>implying you ever worked with film
It's a nightmare to process, pointless in this day and age and you're a nostalgiagay who doesn't know what he's talking about.
"Physical media" is just a visceral stunt that adds value for a limited audience, same as taping a banana to a wall. If you're trying to attain a visual result, you're better off using a digital medium.
you ever worked with film >It's a nightmare to process, pointless in this day and age and you're a nostalgiagay who doesn't know what he's talking about
Digital killed movies for me. No digital movie has really made me feel anything with its visuals. It's sterile and flat with no texture and emotion. Film makes you feel things digital just shows you things.
You're a fricking moron if you don't realize both have pros and cons. Digital is preferred these days because handling/storing/transporting a physical medium is costly and digital is superior for post-production changes which movies made by committee love because they can alter any detail they want at any point based on the whims of their board of directors and sponsors.
Lynch is one of the very rare exceptions to artists who are aging but take up newer technologies. Inland Empire looks like almost nothing else in the world, its incredible.
Nolan btfo.
He said that but he never explored digital cameras. He barely works
>he never explored digital cameras
And boy does it look shit compared to film
>implying you ever worked with film
It's a nightmare to process, pointless in this day and age and you're a nostalgiagay who doesn't know what he's talking about.
i guess digital art also made physical media pointless right?
"Physical media" is just a visceral stunt that adds value for a limited audience, same as taping a banana to a wall. If you're trying to attain a visual result, you're better off using a digital medium.
you ever worked with film
>It's a nightmare to process, pointless in this day and age and you're a nostalgiagay who doesn't know what he's talking about
Ever tried to work with film, gay? I have.
>Ever tried to work with film, gay? I have
So what?
Ever tried to do brain surgery?
Its not my work since Im not a filmmaker getting paid loads of money
filtered
Digital killed movies for me. No digital movie has really made me feel anything with its visuals. It's sterile and flat with no texture and emotion. Film makes you feel things digital just shows you things.
Are you trying to kiss some boomer professor's ass writing fruity shit like that?
>texture and emotion
>from flat images projected onto a screen
>ishygddt
Can you elaborate on that?
>Record something on digital camera
>call it a film
>record something on film
>then record that film digitally
>still call it a film instead of a video of a film
Inland Empire proved digital can be art, but while digital can succeed film it’ll never be superior
and then he wants to lecture people watching movies on their phones
what an idiot
Twin Peaks season 3 looked like ass and Im sick of pretending it didn't
lynched
>posts only the darkest images so you can't tell how shitty they are
kek
Case in point
Also, "lynched", yet the first two seasons of Twin Peaks is my favorite tv series of all time
Film is inferior objectively, it's only superior subjectively
You're a fricking moron if you don't realize both have pros and cons. Digital is preferred these days because handling/storing/transporting a physical medium is costly and digital is superior for post-production changes which movies made by committee love because they can alter any detail they want at any point based on the whims of their board of directors and sponsors.
Lynch is one of the very rare exceptions to artists who are aging but take up newer technologies. Inland Empire looks like almost nothing else in the world, its incredible.