DCbros we have been made...
 Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
 DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
DCbros we have been made...
DCbros we have been made...
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
Nooooooo shit.
>Twitter is full of bots!
>There are no bots on Twitter, no proof
>This director that suits don't like got popular
>It was all those bots on Twitter
>I thought there weren't any?
>Yes. No. Maybe.
Who are you quoting?
>Who are you quoting?
Stfu you little c**t
>DC
Restore the sneederverse
>He thinks there are "real" accounts
Ngmi
>Nooooo, it's all Snyder's fault!
Alright, what the frick is going on there?
You need a scapegoat, never ever admit your own wrongdoing
Cinemaphile has known this for years. Happens here everyday as a matter of fact.
bots and pajeets
what a fricking embarrassment
how does that explain HBOmax/go subscriptions and views?
Well it turned out just fine, HBO Max had twice as many app sessions as Disney+ the weekend ZSJL came out. Disney+ is a massive failure but still impressive
I am not a robot.
hi pajeet
I've heard that before.
What now Rolling Stone?
Kek. Gottem.
This is different. For social media accounts you need x-amount of followers at various intervals to unlock features and to remove restrictions. If you have a deadline to reach certain company goals some opt to just do that.
Snyder himself put them on the spot about their claims. He basicalky said, "If this is all as artificial as you claim, then why can't media giants such as yourselves drum up similar hype? If itxs fake, you should hire them, because they're better at their hobby than your marketing department is at their jobs." It was fricking hilarious.
No it's not hilarious. Large companies don't use bots that can easily be traced back to them or at least don't use them in that manner. They have the money to pay real media outlets to support their interests while (you) are hiring pajeets and using bots that a first year programmer and legit morons on forums can detect with ease.
>our botfarm is better than your botfarm because its harder to detect
the absolute state of social media
>Large companies don't use bots that can easily be traced back to them or at least don't use them in that manner.
Riiiiiiiight.
I disagree. It’s pretty fricking hilarious. I guess some of us just aren’t as blinded by irrational hatred as you.
>genuine fans with genuine hype bad because some are shitskins
>Billion dollar corp paying clickbait sites to make biased news good!
>then why can't media giants such as yourselves drum up similar hype?
You mean like the dozen or so shill threads on Cinemaphile right now?
Or the honestly hilarious shillposting in youtube comments sections for upcoming Hollywood films?
Who the frick do you think you're talking to?
why would anyone shill on Cinemaphile I will concede however some threads are very artificial but a lot of "shill" threads are just shows that came out that week or ironic shitposting
>why would anyone shill on Cinemaphile
Because of "visibility" and also because it's basically free. Shills use Cinemaphile for shitting on competing products more than actual shilling though but there's some of that too
How many DC shill threads you see up at any given time? Are you that fricking stupid that you couldn’t infer from context that that’s who he was talking about?
Did they think all of those Indians were going to pay for it to stream it on HBO Max for it's US release weekend?!? LOLOLOLOLOL
Zack lost.
It all worked out in the end so who cares