>Disney test the waters to going back to traditional animation.
>Goofy How to Stat at Home
>Pixar’s movies are going to streaming.
>Lightyear flops.
>101 Dalmatians X Givenchy commercial.
>Strange World is definitely going to flop.
Makes all too much sense to me.
 |
 CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
|
how high were you when you typed this
not high enough,
OP don't be a b***h, and blast that shit
More like Disney is going kill theaters, like 50 percent of shit in theater are own by Disney, imagine 50 of movies going to shit and no body watching them, theaters are already struggling not half of their revenue disappearing? It over.
Disney is going to kill us all
Hopefully Disney just fricking dies and gets bought up by Amazon or some shit.
This. Amazon isn’t an evil company like Disney.
>Amazon isn’t an evil company like Disney.
lol
>Disney is going to kill CG just to bring back 2D
Good.
Would be the only based thing they’ve done since Tarzan
you just know
Damn that woman’s sexy
The blonde too
It such a rarity to not be disappointed by Cinemaphile these days.
have a nice day, coping Mouse shill.
>disney is going to kill an industry they brought up by bringing back an industry they had killed off
Ah yes the Dalmations shilling fashion the whole reason Cruella wanted to kill them. Fricking morons
Trust the Disney Plan, guys!
Disney took those Blackrock dollars to shill diversity and Buzz as a trick white villain, and is now realizing the hard way you don't just get your viewers trust back.
Where did this “black rock” thingamajig meme come from anyway? I know it’s a major money company but don’t tell me people got it from that “why the woke won’t go broke” post on /misc/ because I’m honestly convinced it’s a ploy by them just to get more users on that board in general , it’s fricking /misc/ for crying out loud.
Anyway back on topic
I don’t think they’re gonna kill CG entirely but we are most certainly at the point were people kind of want to see more traditional animation again and not like those adult comedies on adult swim or FOX.
They're demanding businesses and even entire countries conform to woke ideology to receve investment. Divide-and-rule by globohomo
Those countries are starting to go bankrupt so it's clear that they're setting them up to be one of the big scapegoats along with the WEF. Elites might be fricked in the head but even they were traumatized by Misc Pot enough to make sure they don't create more of him
How is the WEF a scapegoat and not genuninely responsible? As long as the national leaders who were eager scions of it are included are not allowed to plead innocence.
The CEO is israeli.
That's all it takes.
Black rock is a company that holds a majority portion of shares in basically every major company in the world, either directly, or with proxy companies. Because of this, they have a handle on almost every major industry, from media to manufacturing.
>holds a majority portion of shares in basically every major company in the world
lol. lmao even.
Blackrock's total assets are 177bn. That's enough to buy 10% of Microsoft and that's it. You moronic kids hear someone call something big and you just extrapolate that it means they own literally everything, probably because it makes the world easier to understand.
My bad, adding up everything Blackrock's assets are valued at 10tn, which if it was all in stock (it isn't, far from it), would be enough to be majority shareholders of all the companies under the Nasdaq umbrella. That's a lot, but what it's not is anything under the Dow Jones umbrella or any company that's not American.
Black rock injects investments into organizations that go full tilt into PC/SJW/DEI stuff. They don't actually care about brown/gay people though. This is especially clear since the economic policies blackrock pushes for will crush third worlders and middle-class/poor first worlders.
>waaaah /misc/
you don't need to be a /misc/tard to know how evil Blackrock is, Cinemaphilemblr
So, a big evil corporation and all the greedy homosexuals who collaborate with it are to blame for the state the world's in? I don't know whether to laugh or cry.
It's a "public-private" thing, like all the evil shit nowadays.
Is there no pushback against this? No conservative corporations, no right-leaning billionaires?
Treasure Planet killed western 2D films not based on cartoons. It flopped at box office and wasn't that great of a film (too many comic reliefs and slightly dull 2nd half)
Riddle me this anon
Say by some miracle theatrical 2D does come back, what worthwhile movies do you think Disney is gonna make?
They're not gonna wanna do anything unique and different with it and at best are just gonna wanna try to re-create the renaissance era without understanding what made the movies from that era good.
The issue isn't "2D good 3D bad", it's that modern Disney lacks an idenitity and soul.
But "3D bad" is part of the issue.
>re-create the renaissance
I’d rather they recreate the Gold and Silver era.
The reason Princess and the Frog didn’t do that hot was because it wasn’t far before they released those cheap DTV cheapquels and Home on the Range (Ariel’s Beginning a year before).
Had they released PatF little later than it could have done well.
How about Hansel and Gretel?
They already do.
>The issue isn't "2D good 3D bad", it's that modern Disney lacks an idenitity and soul.
Hmm, good point, ratposter. I've wanted 2D for a long time now, but actually 2D western animation looks god awful and at least we're masters of 3D animation. I think we should just let the Japanese have 2D for now.
If they made a 2D movie now, it wouldn't be white, good, or possibly even straight. It'd probably be about like a black girl who's just Dipper Pines in some form of the CalArts style.
Lowpoly rat, awesome
Dog thread?
Why did they give the b***h a fatass? Babyweight?
She pumped out literally dozens of puppies
>Had they released PatF little later than it could have done well.
There's a pretty high probability PatF and Pooh 2011 only exist because Iger wanted to garner favor from Roy Disney, who died in 2009.
The fact they can even reconsider their situation is a hopeful sign. When you realize you're going down the wrong road, the smartest thing to do is turn back.
Can’t wait to see braindead millennials and zoomers piss and moan about CG movies dying for 2D and call it cheap.
I'm legitimately surprised it hasn't happened already. You'd think with how much Hollywood and audiences love nostalgia, that they would've made another 2D animated princess movie. Like the anon said, Princess and the Frog would have been perfect for today.
And yeah, Strange World WILL flop, mark my words.
>nostalgia for princess movies
You're thinking of the merchandising brand that didn't exist before 2005. The only time Disney had real "princess saturation" in their animated films was from Little Mermaid to Pocahontas, a 6 year period within their 70 year history of releasing 2D animated features. For most of Disney's existence "princess nostalgia" was not a thing.
It won’t
As
said, they don't do it because they literally can't.
Frick off with your out-dated bait.
This seems like an interesting read, where can I find the rest?
It's from this, something every animation student in America is required to study from. Turns out art school ain't so useless after all.
Depends on whether or not they actually do so.
>muh realism is not realistic enough
Sure, boomer.
Don't they work CG animators to the bone while paying them peanuts? I don't think they can do the same with 2D animators.
CG being cheaper than 2D is a gigantic meme. Also, 2D animators can and do get shafted.
anon, you are delusional
You may not have liked Turning Red (neither did I) or Lightyear, but those were actual movies where the creator thought they were doing a good job and anyone with a brain can tell that
nothing they've made at either Pixar or WDAS has come close to the absolute dumpster fire of Home on the Range which was actually, legitimately intentionally made to be bad and not just /misc/schizo conspiracy theory
>Home on the Range was made to be intentionally bad
Proof? What's the story behind it?
_ ____ __ ____ ____ ___.
>Disney will die any day now
>the MCU will die any day now
>too big to fail
Nu-Disney does not have the talent to bring back the golden age quality. Best they can do when it comes to 2D is something in the lines of that cheap Lion King flash cartoon for toddlers.
That show looked anything but cheap. The Disney shows with their Korean hand-drawn artistry don't look half as good.
>Strange World is definitely going to flop.
It stole its name from a 2019 paranormal investigation TV show
The problem of going back to 2D is it will inevitably be digitally drawn. All digital animation is shit. It needs to be ink and paint, done entirely by hand, and it needs to be animated on 1s. The only way Disney will make a comeback with animation is BTFO every cartoon made in history. They need to create a real work of art and originality, a modern legacy, that ignites the industry the same way it happened in the early 20th century. If this isn't accomplished, it will be SHIT and a failure like everything else they've done for at least 30 years. CG is and always will be garbage, computers belong in landfills.
>computers belong in landfills.
Throw yours away then, so you could stop posting on Cinemaphile and help make this board an ounce less stupider.
>digital is shit
Cinemaphile must be shit too then since it’s digital.
Cinemaphile already is shit, what's your point
>New Bad
>Old le Good
Because frick technology. We should just throw away our TVs, cars, and our lightbulbs if that’s the case.
And stick to just rubbing sticks together, living in a cave, and hunt animals.
With no growth or improvement.
>New Bad
>Old le Good
That's right, homosexual.
Last time they put art before profit trying to btfo everything (Sleeping Beauty) they almost went bankrupt. And that only happened in the first place because Walt wanted it, now that they're firmly a massive stockholder invested company there's no fricking chance. You're looking at the wrong people (industrialists) to advance art. moronic boomer larper.
Good. 2D should make a comeback
Anyone compared the Cuphead video game animation to the Cuphead Netflix animation? What the actual frick is Netflix's problem? All you need to do is add a filter to make it look like it's animated on cels. What the frick is wrong with them? Funnily enough Netflix's Cuphead has a higher framerate in certain scenes than the video game, but the movement still doesn't look like those old timey cartoons like the video game easily reproduced.
The directors behind Netflix need a belt on the ass to conform to standards outside their circlejerk, that's what they need. It's exactly like beating up a kid who refuses to do the homework correctly. It's exactly like beating up a Mexican kid who refuses to stop eating sugar straight from the cupboard.
they didn't easily reproduce the style in the video game, they went through the entire traditional process which takes a lot of time and effort, you are a moron
None of the people who praise Cuphead as a renaissance of animation have a clue how it was made and why it couldn't translate to cartoons.
>None of the people who praise Cuphead as a renaissance of animation have a clue how it was made and why it couldn't translate to cartoons.
Then why do we still utilize Koreans who literally almost do the same thing when making tv cartoon animation, albeit slightly less skilled? No, this isn't rhetorical either.
Oh look a little zoomer trying to act like he knows what he's talking about. Shut the frick up, you don't know shit.
>Disney is going to kill CG just to bring back 2D
Never gonna happen. 2-D is too specialized and time-intensive now while 3-D is a revolving door of burnt out VFX artists that can easily recycle shit.
I'm 100% sure that Disney will use the flop the Chip n Dale movie was to justify once again that 2D is outdated and no one wants it.
You know it's true.
That movie was almost entirely CGI, you moron.
It's the 10% in 2D part that will be used to condemn 2D