>The film will begin immediately after the mid-credits scene from "Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness", which featured Doctor Strange heading into the Dark Dimension with the sorceress Clea, played by Charlize Theron, to fix an incursion that he caused. The upcoming threequel will reveal that Clea is part of a multiversal order of sorcerers that is headquartered within the space of two dead universes caused by an incursion. They task Strange and Clea with finding the source of the incursions which have left the Multiverse on the brink of collapse, putting Strange on a collision course with the Coucil of Kangs, the looming threat that will bring the Avengers back together in 2026's "Avengers: The Kang Dynasty."
>Along the way, Strange must also reckon with the revelation that he is also one of the most dangerous threats to the Multiverse, with several of his variants having caused universe-destroying incursions, and once again face off against from the dark god Dormammu, who seeks to take advantage of the weakened barriers between realities to assimilate all of existence.
https://www.cbr.com/doctor-strange-3-adapt-time-runs-out-storyline-rumor/
 It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
 Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
doctor strange meet doctor steal
Too much shit happening to shove into just one movie. Confirmed poopoo caca.
> Charlize Theron
Hard pass. After what she did to her sons she doesn’t deserve to be in movies anymore. Fricking freak.
Explain
she made them transition
Why do you care what some celebrity weirdo does? Pratt gives to some billionaire hate-preacher, half the cast are Scientologists, half the directors signed the 1992 Polanski petition, the producers are all boofing adrenochrome out of Disneyland fairground actors' buttholes, and the whole thing is controlled by Walt's frozen head.
At what point in the evil Disney scheme to turn children into money did you get on your fricking high horse, anon? This shit's been evil since 1953.
This. Either don't watch the movie or just pirate, bro. But the truth is Hollywood's always been an evil institution with (formerly) very good PR.
Why do people now act like 95% of the people involved in the music and film industries being utterly reprehensible is some kind of revelation? It always just used to be a given.
The efforts of PR departments.
The masses generally wanting to turn their brains off, not think and get their dopamine hit from consooming (franchise) and supporting (big name) after work.
Other people being financially invested in covering up their bullshit for their own careers.
Take your pick, bro. In another decade or two people will forget that the mafia used to be involved with moviemaking to the extent that Don Corleone starred next to an actual mafioso that got to play a gangster meeting him
Sounds cool.
The second movie was so unbelievable bad I'll nver watch it.
When are they replacing the kang Kang actor with another Kang
So every Avenger gets to kill a Kang now?
If they’re bringing back Raimi and let him do his thing, then I’ll watch it
Are the Black priests going to be created by a variant of Strange? Or perhaps our version of Strange but in the future? This seems to be a strange way to introduce them.
>to fix an incursion that he caused
Is it me or do the heroes of the MCU CAUSE more problems than they solve?
They're much better about it than the actual comics. I mean, they didn't cause Thanos, and Thanos was the crux of everything happening up to Endgame.
We are, unfortunately, reaching the point where the movies aping the comics has become a bad thing.
>Strange...BAD
Also are we still pretending like Wanda massacring people remorselessly just because she wanted two specific children the schizo saw in a dream (while barely thinking about Vision himself at all, or pausing to think about how she GOT those kids) is somehow justified? As opposed to, say, Strange breaking the universe in that one What If? episode?
"Strange is bad because he has the potential for universal destruction in a few really shitty timelines" is as moronic as arguing that because Tony is a flawed person and a drunk butthole, the world would have been better off without Iron Man
I liked DS1 a lot more than most but 2 was a huge mess. Everything involving Kang has also been a huge mess. The MCU has a been a horror story these last few years.
DS1 was a strange experience for me. My first watch of it had me tremendously disappointed by how blatant the quip moments were inserted. In my second watchthrough I actually liked the underlying plot. It was still fricked over by the quips, but I liked the original idea they were clearly going for before someone clearly decided it had to be more "funny" to not intimidate the most pea-brained audience members.
But yeah, everything about 2 and Kang has been absolute horseshit except for the handful of scenes in 2 directed by Raimi where Wanda operates like a horror movie character instead of another generic glowing energy blaster. There is absolutely nothing impressive about Kang though. There is no coming back from jobbing to fricking ANTS
It just seems like they don't have a plan anymore. Everything up to Infinity War / Endgame had that feeling of building up to something greater. Now you have a bunch of spread out (movie, streaming) products which kind of milled about with and now you are seeing some patchwork multiverse plots that don't all fit together. It feels rudderless. Like why Black Widow? Why Eternals? Shang Chi? And that's skipping the D+ series that aren't Loki or Wandavision. They don't seem to add anything.
I think the MCU hit a point where Feige and the suits thought they could do no wrong and were huffing their own farts (hence all the prestige projects,) or Chadwick's death really, REALLY fricked things over and they still haven't fixed the ship.
>or Chadwick's death really, REALLY fricked things over and they still haven't fixed the ship.
Little bit of column A, little bit of column B if you believe Black Panther's What If? episode maybe. Assuming you buy that it was made before Chadwick's death it seems like they were always intending to make T'challa out to be basically Wakandan Jesus given how hard they wanked his all-round competence even without being raised in Wakanda, a far cry from the angry young man slowly developing into a realistic but compassionate monarch in what was seen of his initial arc.
Chadwick seems alright for an actor and honestly MCU Black Panther is leagues better than his comics version simply because in his first movie he goes out of his way to open up Wakanda instead of withholding cancer cures, but it does feel like they were very accelerationist about wanting to exaggerate his character into a flawless do-it-all
Why keep putting Kang or versions of Kang in shit? Has no one considered that if you keep putting them in movies and shows where they lose to individual heroes and their c-list sidekicks that the threat of the villain for an Avengers movie where a team of heroes is working together his threat is diminished in the eyes of the audience. The next Avengers movie starts, Kang Reveals himself as the source of all the chaos and half the fricking team points and says in unison "Hey, didn't I kick your ass?", then they look at each other once again in unison "You too?", then Ant-Man say"jinx".
>The next Avengers movie starts, Kang Reveals himself as the source of all the chaos and half the fricking team points and says in unison "Hey, didn't I kick your ass?", then they look at each other once again in unison "You too?", then Ant-Man say"jinx".
KEK, they should actually do that just to scrap Kang and introduce a better villain. Frick, make Dormammu the main villain for all I care, even a glowing CGI head has more stage presence than Kang.
Frankly the High Evolutionary was a better villain than Kang even though he was also the most smalltime main Guardians villain. At least, compared to a Kree with an Infinity Stone and a fricking Celestial.