>DUDE AN HOUR OF WATCHING EMPTY ROOMS THROUGH A SLOWLY PANNING CAMERA FEED...

>DUDE AN HOUR OF WATCHING EMPTY ROOMS THROUGH A SLOWLY PANNING CAMERA FEED... IM GOING INSANE
>DID THAT CHAIR JUST MOVE SLIGHTLY???

How the frick did this 'horror' format even succeed in the first place? Jesus Christ.

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    it's cheap as frick to make. even cheaper than other horror slop.

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Hard agree. When it came out back then I remember I was still a /b/tard, and it was being propped up as the scariest movie ever ever with viral marketing. The amount of morons that fell for it I still can't understand, it's so so bad. Can't even say it was groundbreaking for its time due to the script or cinematography or acting or whatever and it's dated now, nope, it was always a terrible movie.

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >5 million dollar budget
    >100 million box office guaranteed, every time

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      how do you blow 5 million to this shit?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      how do you blow 5 million to this shit?

      It was made for $15k.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >5 million dollar budget
        >100 million box office guaranteed, every time

        >$15000 budget
        >200 million box office

        Is that the best return on budget in the history of cinema?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          yes

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          yes

          wrong kid

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Made me scared in my room after watching it so it did something also BAZONKAS!!!

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    the ones after the third movie are some of the most godawful trash I've ever watched

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Tatas

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Pretty much all horror fans hated these but for some reason normies lapped it up. I thought the first one was pretty decent.

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It makes you think something scary and spooky will happen at any minute or a jump scare but then nothing happens for 90% of the movie, it was a one trick pony which is why each sequel got worse.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      this. people were being bombarded with jumpscare shit and this preyed on that reflex

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    considering the small budget they did well with the hand they were dealt with tbh, the movie's not scary at all but it also has no competition, compared to other shitty horrorslop movies out there which launched it ahead of other films

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    That b***h had some sexy fricking thighs. Nice big breasts too.

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Millennial morons thought it was real unironically.

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >wife watching ghost adventures
    >realizing just how much easier it was to digest when it was a weekly show you sometimes saw
    >being bombarded with concentrated zak 3+ episodes in a row is like being punched directly in the part of the brain that processes cringe

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      ok mike

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Your wife is a homosexual, I've watched 120 episodes of ghost adventures in the last two months.

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Holy moly look at these milktrucks.

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I thought the lore they tried to establish around the two main sisters and Grandma Lois had potential but they never explored it satisfactorily.

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It's low-budget 2000s kino and so are 2 and 3. Great moments in each. 4 and beyond are bad, though

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    as a third worlder all I remember from those movies is wanting a mcmansion like americans

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    milk

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I rewatched Paranormal Activity last night, how did you know? Also how are 2 and 3?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Not OP, but the second one is a bit better.
      Th third one is the best one, but I missed big-titty girl.
      The fourth one sucked.
      The Ghost Dimension was ok.
      Next of Kin was just some other movie with the PA name slapped on it. It was avarege at best.

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    That movie and all sequels with Katie in it never scared me because i was to distracted by the boner in my pant.

    What a fricking goddess.

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Deep Throat
    $25K - $22M
    Paranormal Activity
    450K - 89M

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    god i want to impregnate her so badly its unreal

  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It's the expectations of horror that makes it scary. You just don't understand the art of film making

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I saw the first one in a movie theater full of black people and I've never heard so much screaming and hollering. They where legitimately terrified

  24. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    it was essential normalgay viewing for weekend kinoplex trips

  25. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It inverts a number of normal horror tropes with a lot of building anticipation but no scaring, which makes the actual startle parts that much more alarming. Further the found-footage nature of it sort of capitalized on the early trends of digital room recording/baby monitor stuff that was coming into play.

    I'm not going to say it was above average but it was doing something distinctly different from a lot of the horror films at the time, and it's set in a very unassuming place to unassuming people, using a topic many people are scared of (ghosts) without it relying on some shitty CGI ghosts like Ghost Ship or House on Haunted Hill.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *