Still better than new shows written by humans. What are the implications?
https://www.twitch.tv/watchmeforever?tt_medium=mobile_web_share&tt_content=channel
Endless AI Seinfeld
This phonograph "reads" a rock’s rough surface and transforms it into beautiful ambient music pic.twitter.com/PYDzYsWWf8
— Surreal Videos (@SurrealVideos) March 3, 2023
Infinite trash. We are going to get lazy.
>infinite trash
So nothing changes then
No, Seinfeld ended in a high note and should have been left at that.
>tt_medium=mobile_web_share
Mobilefags leave
Can’t afford one, can you?
Doesn't feel even remotely like Seinfeld. They don't talk in colloquialisms like in the show
they just used the seinfeld brand as a cover to appeal to redditoids that worship the show still (aka both of you)
>redditoids that worship the show
reddit is too busy watching she hulk and gay porn to care about transphobic boomer kino like Seinfeld, please.
So who's your favorite character? I think I'm an Yvonne guy.
Shiksappeal
young Elaine always gets me hard
She is from one of the most famous gnomish families
That Kakler guy is such a goof, I'm sure he would never say anything offensive
Larry cracks me up everytime, love that guy
That episode where every word the characters said was moron was really weird
The only funny moment is when they randomly start loudly using the microwave mid-way through a punchline.
BEEP BEEP
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
I like to think of it as AI interacting with each other as humanly as they possibly can and we the audience are just watching them through an aquarium of sorts
>The new mayor enacted a law that requires you to wear a clown nose while you commute to boost morale, what's up with that?
thanks for the insight, reddit
>>The new mayor enacted a law that requires you to wear a clown nose while you commute to boost morale, what's up with that?
Is it some king of currency thing? Not a big deal. Not a big deal at all!
God. Very soon all media will be like this and having actual actors perform will seem like some antiquated Hipster thing
https://clips.twitch.tv/SplendidGracefulSpaghettiOSsloth-4-MZbgNf3bBvhmHV
uhh based?
>no jokes
>no sense
>characters act nothing like seinfeld
>characters sound nothing like seinfeld
this is pointless.
i thought it was stupid and couldn't stop watching
Did they actually use Seinfeld scripts to train a model or did they just prompt a regular GPT-3 model with "Generate episode of Seinfeld with the plot containing (random words)"?
it's some old version which is why it's shit, chatgpt soon (TM)
Kakler, nooooooooo!
88888888888888888888888
What are we watching tonight, boys?
garden gnome WORLD
Is there anyway we can manipulate this to get one of the characters to say moron?
>You vill vatch your AI TV
>You vill pley your AI games
>You vill have an AI vife
>You vill live in da pod
>You vill eat da bugs
>You vill own noting
>And you vill be happy
Comedians are going to start bitching about this and being replaced by AI watch
I haven't laughed at a comedian in years but I've gotten a couple of chuckles out of this Seinfeld AI.
>larry just said "aint no ting"
lmao this AI is funny, gotta get better voices tho
Buy an ad gay
seeing this i'm a little less worried about the ai takeover. we have at least a year.
chatgpt script combined with that new voice ai would utterly mog this, someone just needs to spend a week to duct tape them together
is it possible to make the voice ai's laugh? if you write *laughs* or "ha ha" it just says those things out loud. you wouldn't need it for the audience obviously but sometimes the characters need to laugh.
no idea. at worst you could have the program detect "haha" and splice in laughter
the stand-up sections do this but they break sometimes
>chatgpt script combined with that new voice ai would utterly mog this
It would but they're purposefully not going for too much accuracy, the names are changed for one. Might become more of a legal headache if they did that, could potentially get content-matched or whatever.
Damn I want to fuck around with this but the garden gnomes over at chat gpt charge for API access
>how DARE these people charge me to use their computer?
I wouldn't mind paying if they gave me some free restricted environment to test
They literally do. You're asking for free API access
They don't
>We are excited to introduce ChatGPT to get users’ feedback and learn about its strengths and weaknesses. During the research preview, usage of ChatGPT is free. Try it now at chat.openai.com.
>During the research preview, usage of ChatGPT is free
https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt/
You're free to fuck around with it but you need to pay for API access
Yes and it would be nice if they gave some restricted api access for testing
they do retard. pay for access then go into playground and u can do whatever u want.
All the environments are heavily restricted.
here's something to follow: https://github.com/LAION-AI/Open-Assistant
>Call your product OpenAI
>It's not open source
>call your product ChatGPT
>it's not a general partition table of any kind
FRAUD
i don't rdmember them getting so much use out of the microwave.
>mfw i hear about the new store down the street exit to applause
>Have you heard about that new restaurant down the street?
>no, what do they sell?
>hahahahaha
>they sell different combinations of things
>oh, that sounds exiting
>hahahahaha
>end scene
>ice cream?
>I love ice cream!
Reminds me of the creepy pasta about bots in a Counter Strike match on an empty server gaining sentience over time
>fart fetish jokes
I don't know why but I'm obsessed with this. I've had it on for the past 6-7 hours (in the background).
It mentions 'machine learning' so I wonder if it hones itself to be gradually more like accurate to the show.
I think it reacts to the chat to some degree, if people start typing lmao for example a laugh track usually plays
>SO HECKIN CURSED AND QUIRKY
https://clips.twitch.tv/OriginalTenaciousGrousePanicBasket-pPFe3nNNmnOfX0zk
https://clips.twitch.tv/ProtectiveTiredPeafowlFreakinStinkin-eoPacA8zQRJCy3Qb
The other three don't even attempt to be close but Elaine does sound pretty close
>Here's a joke for all the married couples
>.....
>.....
>end scene
There was also a really surreal "episode" the other night where Kackler went on a two minute monologue about the benefits of a benevolent dictatorship.
Damn I need to see that last one
I swear something similar is in the show itself, it's a pure Larry David sort of diatribe.
>all the homos in the chat acting like its the most hilarious fucking thing they've ever seen
why is the internet so spiritually reddit now
Hide chat on every Twitch stream and the site becomes just about tolerable
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
BRING BACK KAKLER
>is this "reddit" in the room with us right now?
reddit reply
It’s peak Reddit though.
They've messed up with the Larry stand-ups because they've clearly just fed in a bunch of actual jokes rather than getting him to make obvious observations.
Yeah it should just be a list of nouns, go to that wikipedia page for that noun and grab the second sentence, then just have him say
>So you ever notice the thing about [noun]?
>[second sentence from wiki]
then a retort from a list of possible retorts like >I'd prefer it the other way
>now that really is something
>what's the deal with that?
>are we really in agreement on this?
etc
I'll try one, Taxis
>So you ever notice the thing about Taxis?
>A taxicab conveys passengers between locations of their choice
>What's the deal with that?
Yeah you'd think it would be fairly simple. They wouldn't even always need to necessarily make sense, adding some variance.
Its cause it was made by some dudes in their spare time over 4 years before most of this ai stuff that happened the last couple of years, so it is pretty primitive.
Oh really, that's fair enough then. Strange timing with the ChatGPT etc. stuff.
>they've clearly just fed in a bunch of actual jokes
He says 'pauses for laughter' and stuff so yeah I think these parts are all pre-written
Maybe it cuts to these to give the AI time to render the rest, earlier it kept cutting to a fake set of TV listings for about the same amount of time and that was more jarring
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
They should make a device that takes all the steps out of cooking
Or a device that erases all laundry
>What's the deal with microwaves?
>Hello, Larry
What did the fish say when it hit the concrete wall? Damn
Why did the chicken cross the playground (laughter) To get to the other slide!
What did the fish say when it hit the concrete wall damn.
what does the fox say
it's only funny because how unfunny it is
it will get old quick
Yeah it's becoming obvious that this isn't modern AI now. The same slide joke over and over.
Maybe it's only doing that for the stand-up segments though.
GPT-3 is deterministic
it feels like the topics and prompts are pre-selected
everything is very 'placeholdery' & generic
>a couple that recently gotten married got divorced last week
>apparently it was a sham marriage
>they only gotten married so they can get green cards
LMAO HORNY FUCK, I didn't expect THAT joke.
Oy vey two tequilas
About as funny as actual Seinfeld.
larry is a sick man
https://clips.twitch.tv/TentativeMoldyHumanKlappa-9WNrYFF8DpWkVQat
Fuck you
>NEW [PLACE]
>Wanna check it out?
>Yeah heard it has ice cream
>Let's go!
Wow, truly intelligent AI.
But is it pickle ice cream?
Was anyone else the stream when Jerry told a story about being at the grocerie store and then asked the audience if they have anymore "groceriestories"?? I nearly shit myself
For me it was when he demanded the audience give him a standing ovation.
I was there, yeah. It was so fucking funny. "Jerry's" stand-up monologues usually result in him just talking about very banal things like shopping or waiting in line, with nothing close to resembling a punchline. Then he just awkwardly pauses and says "haha." Then he constantly asks "Are you enjoying yourselves" or "Wasn't that a funny joke?" It's goddamn hilarious.
pause for audience laughter
I liked his story about Carl the bird
They're gonna take over the world
This is fucking stupid.
>AI is gonna take us over any days gaizzzz
No. It's machine learning. And it's not entertaining.
>NOOOOOOOO LOOK AT ALL THIS STUFF IT MADE WITH JUST TEXT
Based on pre-existing material. Why does anybody care? Unironically pretending this is cool makes you look like a fucking loser. Holy shit can the Pajeet shill campaign just end already?
explain what a transformer is
Bumbling Beetle
Optimal Primus
The annoying one
Star's Screen
Takara Tomy
Eastenders
WTF a second ago Jerry's standup routine was about Jerry noticing someone buying a "baby Jesus" and he was like "are you gonna have it for dinner?"
The fuck?
Good god that Twitch chat is obnoxious. They just repeat whatever is being said and complain about racism whenever any race is vaguely mentioned. How do people subject themselves to this shit?
>I was walking to the store when a huge bird landed on my head
>It wasn't too big of a bird but it still startled me.
>It turned out the bird was a drone that companies use nowadays.
>And the drone was carrying a package for me if you can believe it.
>I think it's great that we can get deliveries so conveniently and easily.
>But maybe the world wouldn't be so good if there were clouds of drones flying around everyone's head delivering packages,
>so maybe we should just appreciate drones for now while they're still rare.
>Thank you, have a good night.
>Anyone have any questions?
new restaurant
Wow this is so shit. I thought with all the shilling it was going to be using the good voices from last week, but it's just generic TTS voices and low grade procedural game animation. What a fucking pile of shit why does this have 100 replies
You'll pull it back up in 20 minutes and watch for 3 hours like the rest of us. Trust me.
This entire thing is an autist fly trap/honeypot.
Which is why I can't fucking stop watching it.
It's stupid but I'm honestly getting a kick out of it.
same
bots
this is dehumanizing moron shit
>dehumanizing moron shit
??? how?
better this than some fucking ~~*Disney*~~ movie of some shit
this
It's usually unfunny, but it's funny just rarely enough to keep you hooked waiting for the next joke
I mean I'm not sitting here actually watching it, I have it on while I'm at work and shitposting, but I pissed laughing at a few standup bits.
For me, it's when he tells a weird story, then there's just a long pause, no punchline, the audience laughs and the scene transitions lmao
you're watching forever
It's self-aware
It's really not. AI is good at generating text and dialogue and all that but it completely lacks substance. This show is a great example. It's fucking horrid.
Larry made a joke about how his stories are overly long and usually with no punchline, then he rhetorically asked what do you expect from a neverending show.
>AI conversations for hours and hours
>Look guys one interesting thing was said
nvm he died
THEY SAID IT WAS FOREVER
WHAT THE FUCK
nvm he back
This is the most obvious psy-op Glowie brainwashing shit ever
And it is working
I'm sorry, Terry, I have failed you
Idgi what are you proposing about this that this is a psyop?
Bro he's schizo, just ignore them.
Classic Fred
Wonder if it’s possible they’ll go rogue and start killing each other or something
>stream falls for a minute
>half the viewership is gone
Confirmed botted glowie psyop.
you morons are genuinley stupid
In Death Stranding every death is a potential tactical nuke explosion, people self-isolate themselves, and they got the technology to 3D print all sort of stuff.
Do you guys ever think that technology might reach the point where people would rather be their own entertainer?
Right now it looks stupid and nonsensical, but that's because this tech is still in its embryionic phase. Remember that AI robot who learned to walk on its own? At the beginning it was a disaster, couldn't even stay upright. In a few weeks it could run on a tight rope better than an acrobat.
Infinite entertainment procedurally generated by AIs will unironically be the future of tv and probably of movies as well. Human producers are already using the same strategy: find a formula that sells tickets and repeat it ad nauseam. Why wouldn't an AI be able to do it?
Plots and characters generated in a few seconds, virtual actors copied from real ones like deepfakes videos, and in just a few hours you can have a new HD movie indistinguishable from the current slop.
They will prolly allow anyone to make their own movie. You enter your desired elements in a prompt, stuff like "action movie, Bruce Willis, a Hard to Die sequel, biological weapon, car chases, the enemy is a telepathic communist monkey, and also Bruce fucks Anya Taylor Joy for 30 minutes", and the AI will give you exactly that.
And then Virtual Reality (actual VR, immersive, stimulating all your senses, not just sight and hearing) will be invented, either by humans or by some AI. And it will be the end.
We're headed to the death of artistry and humanity. We'll go peacefully, sedated, with a whimper.
there's no doubt in my mind that AI will write better movies than nuHollywood
I've already laughed more at this than any comedy made in the last 15 years
whoa shilling a free stupid fucking meme video whoaaaa, shut the fuck up who cares, go shill last of us or she hulk or some fucking shit, this is harmless fun, no one is actually fucking watching this
>I've already laughed more at this than any comedy made in the last 15 years
What are you laughing at? The only funny thing is how absurd and nonsensical all of these conversations are. It wears off really quickly.
>The only funny thing is how absurd and nonsensical all of these conversations are.
Exactly, and you're right. I watched one cycle, had a chuckle, and moved on? no idea why this one schitzo is so fucking mad about this:
we have psyops and evil propaganda and gnomish shit all day every day nonstop, can we just sit here and laugh at some stupid seinfeld meme without having a mental breakdown and shilling? fuck off
>can we just sit here and laugh at some stupid seinfeld meme without having a mental breakdown
We can, can't say the same about you though you sad cunt.
ACTUALLY getting angry over Cinemaphile posts!
It's not even using current tech. This project started in 2018 before the good stuff dropped.
Even more alarming. The improvements will be even more quickly.
I fully expect AI generated movies to surpass the quality of the marvel-tier slop of today by 2027-2030.
Hopefully this kills the movie industry. I'll be glad to see it die.
Me too, but the problem is: what will replace it?
All of the people saying 'you can't stop watching' are being paid literally 20c. that's their meme they got asked to push
I've been watching it for hours, but it's only amusing in the same way you can only milk so much non-recycled dialogue and interesting moments out of something like Animal Crossing (which is appropriate because it feels like a bad TV channel from it that you're never actually supposed to fully see or hear)
>what did the fish say when he hit the wall
>dam!
kek that was actually a legit joke
Yes, that was actually, a legit real AI fed joke.
If you google a joke, and it's on the front page with hundred of sources, you are not watching anything but cumstitched text
People have been saying that the standup elements seem to not be AI-generated but rather just fed in to it wholesale because there are only about 20 jokes which it cycles through, even a bad AI would be able to scrape hundreds
There's a long-tail of variety and bizarre stories, a dozen jokes or so are just really popular
>Twitch chat is nothing but people saying the last thing that was said in capital letters
This is cringe.
This isn't very good but some for reason I genuinely can't stop watching. AI is thefuture.
Wow I CANNOT stop watching. This is incredible!
you're being ironic/facetious but posting AI-like responses only adds to the aesthetic and authenticity of the stream, you're falling right into their trap
Can't wait for the future of infinitely generated goyslop. The illusion of art having meaning or humanity has been shattered.
This is as artistic as any shit movie you're about to mention.
Do zoomies really find this dialogue engaging? If so maybe I should try to get some dumb jailbait while I still can.
Wow this is IMPOSSIBLE to stop watching! A W E S OME SAUCE!!
It's like a parity of a far future television show.
It's interdimensional cable (^:
parody
This show could really use an editor.
I don't know, an editor would deprive us from moments like this
https://clips.twitch.tv/DignifiedSullenStrawberryDansGame-2eCHyLxmaQ0ImYXd
>An editor is bad
>Here's me editing a good part of the show and isolating it
Really makes you think.
Oh no a stream on Twitch.. it taking over the world... we must kill this goyslop.. let's rise up bros, shadilay!!
>Revolutionary tech? That computer thingy? It's just a huge box that can do arithmetic, it's slow and as big as an apartment, what potential could it possibly have?
That was you in 1940.
It's shit but has potential.
WTF some of these are actually funny
I know right? I CAN'T STOP WATCHING! If only this could go through some governmental regulation to ensure non-offensive content fit for public consumption, this could be a very valuable public service. Just imagine the possibilities!
Larry's monologues are so fucking funny.
I still cannot believe calzones were mentioned like 5 minutes ago
This shit is an ADHD/Autism fly trap
Quick, easily digestible absurdism with just enough logic to be understandable, but enough variance to keep it interesting, delivered in rapid succession with no breaks.
People with strong enough autism will take time to try and connect all the disparate dialogue and moments together to make some kind of plot, while others will leave it on in the background to drown out the static
I've already heard that some people used this as a sleeping aid
If this WAS a psy-op, then it would be one of the most effective ones in the modern era,
>but enough variance to keep it interesting
???
It's literally them talking in the apartment about food, then flash to Larry giving nonsensical standup, then flash back to them in the apartment talking about food.
I'm already planning on falling asleep to it tonight and making an ASMR video in the future like the relaxing TV guide channel it keeps showing. I know this is gay but I'm really impressed.
>Quick, easily digestible absurdism with just enough logic to be understandable, but enough variance to keep it interesting, delivered in rapid succession with no breaks.
damn, Xavier Renegade Angel looks like THAT??????????
>it's a new restaurant bit
Skip
/misc/ calls this goyslop then DEMANDS you watch 2 men kissing each other on HBOMax
>it's a new restaurant episode
Is it a meme to like this or what? This is trash.
Haha.
Yeah it's pretty nonsensical most of the time but half the fun is the tension you feel when the bit is still forming and you don't know yet if it's gonna be a hit or a miss. It's surprisingly addictive, I can't stop watching!
Its more original and funny than most posts on /misc/
Oh wow, someone posted sneed again, how hilarious and original
Wow, someone replied to me with my own comment but a basedjack face, how did he come up with that one
Wow the AI is talking about restaurants for the 13th time this hour. I can't wait to hear about the new restaurant that opened up in town and listen to banal conversation with a laugh track behind it
How many comments in this thread were generated by chatgpt?
Just mine.
Now I want someone to hook it up to ai voice impersonator and make a surrealistic talk show radio.
Hook it up to that music ai that was popular some time ago for some intermissions.
Bottom Tee Ess Aiych
https://clips.twitch.tv/TolerantVainTrayPhilosoraptor-RJxfg5t0oht11ZoC
>it's a standup routine where Larry just asks the audience to tell him a funny story
We're gonna miss this once these actually start pumping out cohesive and sensical material
I don't know if it will. It uses GPT-3 which is already really outdated, hopefully they can find a way to use ChatGPT but I doubt it.
SHOWER BURPEES
https://clips.twitch.tv/GeniusSavorySandwichTakeNRG-WDikD8ZSjZhtj8yB
>it's another ice cream episode
I am so glad AI is taking away jobs from dumb liberal artists and gnomish 'writers'
It's going to make every job that doesn't involve manual labor obsolete.
Good. About time gays with fake jobs learned something useful for society.
>that doesn't involve manual labor
Once an AI is smart enough to write tv shows, it's smart enough to move around a warehouse or a grocery store and move boxes, stock shelves, etc.
Manual labor isn't as safe as people think.
Wrong. Physically maneuvering and interacting with the physical world is a far more complicated activity than generating text.
Just build an automatic cart with a robotic arm and sensors to judge distances and distinguish between products and shelves. Done.
Oh yeah, just do it. Simple as. You're a genius bro.
We already have all the technology. It's just a matter of training some AI to recognize products and where they need to go. Does it really sound like such an impossible task? It'll be way easier than a self-driving car.
Why do you feel compelled to pretend like you have something to say about things you don't know anything about?
I accept your implicit admission that you have no arguments and wish to end this discussion without admitting that you lost.
I'll give you a hint. Where do you think most of our brain's energy goes into? Logic and reasoning? Creativity? Language? No, most of it goes into motor function.
I already accepted your admission of defeat. You may go now.
>are you saying manual labor won't be replaced by machines?
The exact opposite. Jesus Christ.
It's funny you said motor. Motors have been replacing physical labor since they were invented.
You have no idea what you're asking for. You see a robot in a warehouse that's been very specifically programmed to do a very specific motor task and still requires constant administration and control by a human and you think it's trivial to make a complete autonomous motor robot. It's like looking at someone juggling and thinking since his arms do most of the work he doesn't really need his brain.
>you think it's trivial to make a complete autonomous motor robot
I don't think anyone said it's trivial. You know we've been using robotics for quite some time now, right? This isn't some new crazy idea.
The reason we have so many white color jobs now as opposed to 200 years ago is because of technology and machines. Machines have replaced manual labor and they continue to do so. If you think your job is "safe", think again. Technology is rapidly evolving. Predicting what the job market will look like in 10 years is becoming exceedingly difficult. Will AI create new jobs? Sure. It will eliminate a lot of skilled positions in the process, though.
You don't understand what I'm saying. Yes, you could theoretically create a motor robot for many kind of activities. Stocking shelves. Plumbing. Welding. But some of those activities, like plumbing, are activities that aren't as rote as stocking shelves, so you can't make a specific robot for it, it requires too much fine motor autonomy, and too much understanding of the physical world and breaking it down into abstract forms - it requires a general intelligence that understand how to operate motorically in the physical world. You can't look at the robots in warehouses, then at GPT-3, and think we're a step away from stocking shelves, because like plumbing it requires too fine a motor control and general intelligence. Programming will be replaced before plumbing will, because programming only requires generating text. There is already programming work being replaced. Now tell me, is plumbing already being replaced?
So now we've moved from stocking shelves to plumbing? Yes plumbing is a very specific field that likely will be one of the last things replaced by robots. They're safe for now, but to think robots can't replace them is silly.
What I'm saying is that creating a specific robot for a specific type of warehouse is one thing. What you're talking about is a robot for basically all kinds of stores with shelves. The difference is that it's general and requires adaptation to all kinds of situations.
Still a stupid arguments. Once the robot learns how tall and wide the shelves are, and how heavy and wide the products are, what's the difficulty? And how long do you think it would take for a neutral AI to learn basic informations like that?
Your argument that automated grocery workers are impossible is ridiculous. If they still don't exist it's only because the market isn't yet conducive to their introduction.
Not only did I not say it was impossible, I said that it was possible. Perfect example of a low IQ moron reaches for the strawman when he can't win using basic logic and reasoning because his brain is too fucked to actually us it.
>"Dude we'll never have robotic steel workers are you kidding me? It's too complex, something something fine motor skills.
>"Dude, robotic assembly robots? Dude it's too complicated, do you have any idea how many parts they would need to recognize and handle? Fine motor skills dude."
I really don't understand why you keep speaking about things that you know NOTHING about. Even a child could disprove your arguments, simply because what you claim is impossible already exists, and has existed for a while.
I never claimed specific motor skills are impossible, I also never claimed general motor skills are impossible. All I claimed is that jumping to the conclusion that because we have GPT-3 we have general motor function that's required for stocking shelves (clarifying for the autistic moron in this thread: not stocking the shelves of a specific shop or warehouse but of ALL of them) is ridiculous. We do NOT have the technology for that yet. It's years away at best.
>not stocking the shelves of a specific shop or warehouse but of ALL of them
Yeah an AI capable of learning would find it SO difficult to learn the layout of a store and the height/width/loadbearing capacity of shelves. It wouldn't be able to adapt within a few minutes, no, it's impossible, you're right. A shelf stocker is the limit of our current abilities.
Fucking idiot.
What the fuck is wrong with you? I can't tell if you're schizophrenic or retarded. Either way keep it to yourself. I never said it was impossible. You said it was possible with current technology, which is absolutely mentally deficient.
I already proved that it's possible with current tech:
Mongoloid.
>"Noooo at the moment it's sci-fi! I can't explain what the insormountable obstacle is, but it's impossible!"
>too much understanding of the physical world and breaking it down into abstract forms - it requires a general intelligence that understand how to operate motorically in the physical world.
"Dude no way an AI can understand tubes and shit. Plumbing, how does it work?"
>Technology is rapidly evolving. Predicting what the job market will look like in 10 years is becoming exceedingly difficult.
Indeed. People like welders and artisans were always smug about being automation proof. That's simply not the case. There is zero reason why an AI wouldn't be able to weld with more precision than a human or work wood to generate whatever a human client told it to build. If an AI can do 3d art, it can sculpt a statue or a table or a chair. There is literally no theoretical obstacle.
>If an AI can do 3d art, it can sculpt a statue or a table or a chair.
Holy fuck no, it's completely different. It's like saying if you can imagine a sculpture you can sculpt it.
>if you can imagine a sculpture you can sculpt it.
For an AI connected to the right tools, it would be exactly like that. There is no theoretical obstacle to something like that being possible.
AI can generate art. Where are the painting robots?
>trivial
I said that it's not only possible but it's prolly just a short while away, since we already possess all the necessary technology.
>"Dude no you can't train an AI to move a goddamn robotic arm to stock shelves! It's unpossible! Even though every factory on the planet already has complex robots capable of endlessly performing precise tasks without mistakes! It's unpossible!"
You're one of those people who think they're smart but really aren't.
>"What if we used 100% of our brain?"
>"Then we'd become able to... stock shelves."
>"Whoa."
nta. I don't get what you're arguing, are you saying manual labor won't be replaced by machines? Have you not been paying attention for the last 150 years?
>we have AIs capable of passing the Turing test and defeat GO grandmasters with ease
>"Nooo teaching an AI to scan and recognize different brands and kinds of products and put them on the right shelves is impossible! Pure fantasy!"
Why are there so many stupid kids like you on this website? No, you don't look cool or smart when you posture as if you understood something about a subject you're clearly completely ignorant about.
Jesus, fine. Great. Time to waste my time explaining shit to people who wouldn't listen anyway since they're the type of person to have strong opinions on subjects they haven't researched even for a solid 5 minutes. First of all, the Turing test is no longer accepted as a standard measure of artificial general intelligence. Second, a Go AI only has to train on very well-defined data in a very well-defined ruleset to provide a result in a single mode / domain. An AI that recognizes brands and products and puts them on the right shelves has to have several modes: first of all self-driving motor function, still a very unsolved problem, second a motor mode to move its arms and pick and put things with precision, a visual mode to traverse the world and recognize products and shelves, and finally a language mode that can receive commands and instructions to be able to do its job. How many of these problems do you think are solved individually? How many multimodal models that are capable of synergizing all those modes exist?
We already have robots capable of doing what you claim it's impossible, stupid gay.
>self-driving motor function, still a very unsolved problem
Kek. Fucking roombas can do it. Stupid gay trying to sound smart.
>self-driving motor function
Even roombas can do that.
>a motor mode to move its arms and pick and put things with precision
We have robots that can perform fucking surgeries, gay.
>a visual mode to traverse the world
roombas.
>and recognize products and shelves
We already have AIs capable of pattern recognition just by looking at something. But even that is unnecessary: all they'd need is a scanner for a bar code to understand what product it is and therefore what shelf it needs to go on.
Whoah. Much complex. Very unpossible.
>a language mode that can receive commands and instructions
Alexa. Siri.
Alternatively, you can simply program it and it will do its job without any need for vocal commands.
>How many of these problems do you think are solved individually?
all of them, you stupid gay.
For the last time: you are not a smart guy. Stop posturing as one.
Yeah, why are self-driving cars taking so long? We already have roombas! Fucking dumb gay, have a nice day.
Regulations. Self driving cars are mostly working now. Sometimes they crash though, and we can't have these things driving around potentially killing people.
>Self driving cars are mostly working now
LOL...
Did you just miss the second part of my post, or?
How the fuck is that mostly working well? Nearly crashing wasn't the least of its problems.
It's driving down the road and obeying traffic laws 99% of the time. Yes the 1% is a problem, but it's mostly working.
Did you watch the video? Be real with me, did you?
>Did you watch this 20 minute video linked by a random anon?
No I didn't because I don't invest that much fucking time into Cinemaphile arguments.
>YOU FOOL YOU ABSOLUTE FOOL YOU'RE WRONG AND I'M RIGHT X125216
>Did you watch the video that disproves your claim?
>AWW HELL NAAAAW WHAT AM I A LOSER I'M NOT WATCHING 5 MINUTES OF A YOUTUBE VIDEO THAT DISPROVES ALL MY CLAIMS LOSER
I really hope you're an AI because if you're a human that typed this, it's pretty cringe.
Stupid piece of shit I can't believe you're this fucking stupid.
Self-driving cars are orders of magnitude more complex:
>you need an AI capable of recognizing road lines in many different conditions, from darkness to the paint being so old that it's basically invisible; also road signs that might be rusty, covered by vegetation, etc.
>you need to solve ethical dilemmas like: if a person jumps onto the street and I can't stop, do I sacrifice the pedestrian or turn left and risk killing my driver?
Cars are very dangerous and operate in so many different conditions and are subject to so many unpredictable events (from a kid running into the street to a puddle of oil) that it is VERY difficult to make a self-driving car.
A shelf-stocking robot is piss easy in comparison. Even a braindead monkey would understand it. But not you. Because you have SHIT in your brain and are 50 IQ points lower than you think you are.
Goddammit speaking to my inferiors always pisses me off.
Quit projecting. Someone is mad because they had to round up to get accepted into MENSA. Newsflash moron: If you can understand self-driving cars are more complicated than robots stocking shelves, you can understand robots stocking shelves are more complicated than roombas. Get it? Good, now back to being the smartest kind in Special Ed.
Fucking incredible that you're still here after having been buttblasted into oblivion.
I accept your defeat. Just spare yourself further embarassment.
2 more weeks until those shelf stocking robots bro. What's even the problem? WE HAVE ROOMBAS!
Indeed: what is even the problem? What is the theoretical obstacle?
You can't answer. Because there isn't any, and you're just a shit for brains who keeps trying to look smart. And failing.
Stop projecting your insecurity about intelligence on to me bro. It's cringe. Are you the guy who said we don't have self-driving cars right now because of regulations? Get real dude. You don't know shit, so best shut the fuck up.
>"S-stop p-p-projecting!"
>"There, that w-will shut him up!"
>an AI cannot be trained to distinguish between little fishies and fucking bears.
>Are you the guy who said we don't have self-driving cars right now because of regulations?
No, I'm the one who utterly obliterated you during this argument and proved a dozen times over that your'e intellectually inferior. One example:
You won the debate bro. Better slap on that alexa on that romba and patent your shelf stocking robot before someone steals your idea.
>robots stocking shelves are more complicated than roombas
Stupid comparison. The difference is that we still can't solve the problems connected to self-driving cars but we can absolutely solve all the problems with a robotic shelf stocker. Easily.
The more you try to come off as smart, the more you prove your stupidity. And you don't even seem to realize it. Like all true morons.
Oh, easily huh? Let's hear it then.
would you fuck the store bot?
Already spoonfed you:
>we have roombas and alexa and teslas! we practically already have general intelligence! it's just regulations holding us back!!
Fantastic proof. With your intellect they should give you an honorary PhD. You probably already have a couple though.
Dishonest discussion tactics like this would trick only someone as retarded as you. Here, I'll simplify it for you:
1. Roombas are capable of navigating a tridimensional space.
2. You said that for our current tech, that would be impossible.
3. Hence, you've been proven incorrect (and retarded).
Holy... a roomba. How did I not see this before? Wow. Just wow. Who knows what's next? Sex robots? Completely autonomous stores? The future is now.
We should be working to remove manual labor and mental labor so that we can focus on creating things and getting gains for our own sakes
Will never happen, people like
mentioned will seek to maintain their relevance for all of eternity even when they are worth less than nothing
90% of managers are already worth less than nothing, they're actually detrimental, usually, so that's true, they will fight tooth and nail to stay relevant. Same reason they're trying to get the wagies back into the office.
Robot bodies would be expensive to build and maintain. We fleshbags just need some water and a handful of bug protein to function.
Manual labor will stay human.
Let's say you're a grocery store owner. You can either hire 5 humans and pay them 5 salaries (plus insurance, PTO, sick days, whatever) or buy one robot that works 24/7 without needing anything more than a bit of electricity and occasionally some mainteinance.
You really think the humans are gonna be cheaper? 5 salaries, even low salaries, would be what? $150k per year? Even if they price the automatic worker at $50-80k, you're still gonna save money after just a few months. They'd need to cost millions to be unfeasible, and they will have no reason to be that expensive, once scale production begins.
>insurance, PTO, sick days, whatever
lmao he believes this decadent shit is here to stay
https://clips.twitch.tv/ThankfulObservantPizzaBibleThump-b5QyaaybJkNXCtdY
WTF mpreg AND Gay???
This shit is unironically soulful
I hope robots replace humans soon
>Everything you see, hear, or experience (with the exception of the artwork and laugh track) is always brand new content
I think not!
I hope AI makes the following Obsolete/Automated:
Filing Taxes
Middle-Managers
Upper Managers
CEOs
your mom
>Managers
They already don't do anything, how would AI replace their jobs? AI is going to replace people doing actual work like accounting, programming, data entry, etc.
Some data entry maybe but I contract out some biology related data entry in the winter and a lot of my work requires me to make assessments and judgement calls on how trustworthy and accurate certain data is from certain researchers, which is something that would be extremely difficult to train an AI on.
You're looking at AI right now. Yes, AI won't replace your job right now. But in 10 years who knows? Shit is getting intelligent at a rapid pace. I work for a company that prints mail for people, and one of my coworkers asked chatgpt some of the bigger picture problems were facing and it literally spit out the exact fucking strategies we're working on implementing.
>make assessments and judgement calls
And how do you make those assessments and calls? By examining some data points and knowing that some values are good and others bad.
Why exactly couldn't an AI do the same?
No, its more like.
Researcher A says that he went to Mountain X in 2001 and collected this plant.
I see that and think, "what, that's way out of range". So I go onto GBIF, pull up the record for that collection, notice that he says he collected it from Mountain X, but the sub-local is for a kilometer post on a highway 1000 km away, where it is well within range.
I know form correspondence that Researcher A would always hand off his summer collections to undergrads to sort and digitize so its almost certainly a transcription error by one of his students.
That or the location checks out so I pull up the image of the record in whatever herbarium it was filed in and confirm the ID myself.
Why do you think an AI can't do this? You think an AI can't handle pattern recognition? That's literally what it excels at.
Yeah you could train it to recognize that there's an issue but teaching it to properly identify the source of the issue and correct it would be impossible with current technology and likely extremely difficult even with increases in AI capabilities.
We have AI finding bugs in programs. It's not impossible. Have you looked into chatgpt at all?
Like I said previously, your job isn't being replaced today. I'm talking about in 10 years when AI is way smarter than it is now.
>finding bugs in programs
you mean something basic software has been able to do for decades?
No, I'm saying you provide chatgpt with a program and a basic description of how it works and chatgpt will tell you why it isn't working. I've been working in software development for 10 years. I've never seen anything like it. You are completely underestimating this technology and your arrogance will be your downfall.
>your arrogance will be your downfall
I doubt it, in the summer I work in a remote field camp in Alaska sampling fish and I honestly can't see a robot ever being designed that could do that job as well as a human being
And if my winter work ever gets AI's I'll just cut firewood or open a brewery instead
Have you looked at chatgpt at all? I think you're basing your opinion on AI based off old technology.
Have you ever spent a month test fishing in the Alaskan wilderness in all weather conditions, while also maintaining the field camp and chasing bears away from your sonar equipment?
I think you underestimate field work.
No I haven't because it's not my livelihood and frankly I don't give a shit if AI replaces your job or not. I would be concerned if I were you, because I can see AI replacing my job because I've actually seen how powerful this shit is.
Yeah, a robot couldn't fish, instantly recognize if a fish is too young or diseased or healthy, and chase away bears with an incorporated tank of bear spray. No, your fish-smelling gig is safe.
>robot bear-sprays the fish hatchlings
>thinks bear-spraying a hungry bear would ever deter a bear
Few people know that it's called bear spray because bears love it.
Once again, I accept your implicit admission of defeat.
bears don't really care about bear spray that much.
Give it up, he's just another mongoloid who doesn't know what he's talking about.
>"Dude judging fish quality by color and size is unpossible for an AI!"
>I know form correspondence that Researcher A would always hand off his summer collections to undergrads to sort and digitize so its almost certainly a transcription error by one of his students.
Admittedly, this kind of stuff would be difficult for an AI to know. But it wouldn't be a huge problem. If an AI replaced you, instead of deducing that it's a student's mistake, it would generate some kind of error message and tell people to check their data in case it's wrong.
>it would generate some kind of error message and tell people to check their data in case it's wrong
this is already a thing in a lot of data management positions
I wish I was an AI.
When you lot use 4chan incel lingo like goyslop and wagies, you seem to the rest of us like an AI programmed by the transsexuals on 4chan.
>uhm chud? are you using... heckin imageboard lingo on a... IMAGEBOARD? THATS /POOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL/ TERRITORY!
>wagie
>4chan lingo
hello newfag, reddit not working today?
>advertising your stream channel
Is this what's allowed on /misc/ now?
You don't need to train a human shaped robot to stock store shelves. We literally already have this technology. Warehouses use robots to maintain and stock shelves. Amazon workers, for example, are quickly being replaced by automated systems.
Sssh, don't tell this gay:
He thinks it's sci-fi.
If AI can replace your job easily enough to the point you're -seriously- worried about it, then you don't have a real job.
Barely anyone has a real job nowadays.
What happens once all the jobs are taken by AI? We starve? UBI?
garden gnomes win. All men are culled like male chicks. garden gnomes take all women for themselves
But garden gnomes are exclusively attracted to trans kids.
Although I guess flesh sacrifices get their creepy yiddish clitties going too.
Maybe we'll all burn in a world war before that has chance to happen.
Either
>Rich become ultra rich, everyone else becomes ultra poor and this triggers wars and we all kill ourselves
OR
>We accept AI taking over society. Humans with jobs are now treated with better privileges, everyone else lives a relatively comfy, but basic, neet life.
I remember when I was a kid and the narrative about automation was "machines will work for us so we won't be forced to spend our lives doing shit work".
Now it's "machines will work for us and we'll be homeless and starving".
~~*They*~~ will definitely try to keep all the wealth for themselves and let the goyim starve. ~~*They*~~ can't help themselves. It's in ~~*their*~~ parasitic DNA. And they always push it too far and eventually get recognized like an alien toxic element and purged.
I HOPE YOU ALL GET BEATEN TO DEATH!!!
I don't get all the hate for AI
what is the problem with them taking over? you want to work? you enjoy working for your entire life? if AI integrates into society they'll work for us and everyone will be able to be happy as a NEET
so where's the actual plans for them to take over actual labor then
>he thinks regular shmucks will end up with the money
75% of jobs in society are there because it gives people something to do
>what is the problem with them taking over? you want to work?
The problem is this:
As usual, if it wasn't for ~~*them*~~, automation would be an amazing thing.
Much of AI "job replacement" isn't deleting entire types of work outright, it's improving efficiencies so fewer people are needed. Think ten cashiers vs two supervisors watching a self-checkout line.
Its hella lame that AI is probably going to massively increase productivity and reduce the human workload in a lot of industries but the only ones to actually benefit from it will be owners and investors.
The employees who used to work the positions being "optimized" are just going to be unemployed.
wtf I love AI now
did you hear about the new restaurant that opened down the street?
>instead of using AI to essentially get rid of the need for physical labor and let people explore creative pursuits, people are using AI to essentially plagiarize creative works and would only drive people away from exploring those fields as their work would only get absorbed into the amazon algorithm and slapped on some shower curtains or something
>using AI to essentially get rid of the need for physical labor and let people explore creative pursuits
When is that ever what happens when jobs get automated?
wanna try that again?
>no Kramer
me no watch
The world this AI Seinfeld paints sounds great.
There's always a new shop or event happening in the city, wildlife coexisting in an urban environment, delicious food, everyone is always hanging and having fun together.
What the fuck the real world sucks, I wanna go live in Sainfeld world.
It was amusing for about 5 minutes
>when you´re dreaming and your brain is automatically improvising how the dream will follow through on the spot
huh
Why is no one trying to kill AI makers? In Minecraft of course
>AI is talking about replacing human workers at an ice cream shop with a new, advanced ice cream machine that can make ice cream and cones and new sprinkels and ingredients
I admit I'm really stoned, but I find this absolutely hilarious and I can't stop laughing.
I'm going to the "Pay What You Can" restaurant, you guys want anything?