Endless AI Seinfeld

Still better than new shows written by humans. What are the implications?

https://www.twitch.tv/watchmeforever?tt_medium=mobile_web_share&tt_content=channel

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Infinite trash. We are going to get lazy.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >infinite trash
      So nothing changes then

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        No, Seinfeld ended in a high note and should have been left at that.

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >tt_medium=mobile_web_share
    Mobilegays leave

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Can’t afford one, can you?

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Doesn't feel even remotely like Seinfeld. They don't talk in colloquialisms like in the show

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >no jokes
      >no sense
      >characters act nothing like seinfeld
      >characters sound nothing like seinfeld
      this is pointless.

      they just used the seinfeld brand as a cover to appeal to redditoids that worship the show still (aka both of you)

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >redditoids that worship the show
        reddit is too busy watching she hulk and gay porn to care about transphobic boomer kino like Seinfeld, please.

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    So who's your favorite character? I think I'm an Yvonne guy.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Shiksappeal

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        young Elaine always gets me hard

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        She is from one of the most famous israeli families

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      That Kakler guy is such a goof, I'm sure he would never say anything offensive

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Larry cracks me up everytime, love that guy

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    That episode where every word the characters said was Black person was really weird

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The only funny moment is when they randomly start loudly using the microwave mid-way through a punchline.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      BEEP BEEP
      MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I like to think of it as AI interacting with each other as humanly as they possibly can and we the audience are just watching them through an aquarium of sorts

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >The new mayor enacted a law that requires you to wear a clown nose while you commute to boost morale, what's up with that?

      thanks for the insight, reddit

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >>The new mayor enacted a law that requires you to wear a clown nose while you commute to boost morale, what's up with that?
        Is it some king of currency thing? Not a big deal. Not a big deal at all!

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    God. Very soon all media will be like this and having actual actors perform will seem like some antiquated Hipster thing

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    https://clips.twitch.tv/SplendidGracefulSpaghettiOSsloth-4-MZbgNf3bBvhmHV
    uhh based?

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >no jokes
    >no sense
    >characters act nothing like seinfeld
    >characters sound nothing like seinfeld
    this is pointless.

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    i thought it was stupid and couldn't stop watching

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Did they actually use Seinfeld scripts to train a model or did they just prompt a regular GPT-3 model with "Generate episode of Seinfeld with the plot containing (random words)"?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      it's some old version which is why it's shit, ChatGPT soon (TM)

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Kakler, nooooooooo!

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    88888888888888888888888

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    What are we watching tonight, boys?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      israelite WORLD

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Is there anyway we can manipulate this to get one of the characters to say Black person?

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >You vill vatch your AI TV
    >You vill pley your AI games
    >You vill have an AI vife
    >You vill live in da pod
    >You vill eat da bugs
    >You vill own noting
    >And you vill be happy

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Comedians are going to start b***hing about this and being replaced by AI watch

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I haven't laughed at a comedian in years but I've gotten a couple of chuckles out of this Seinfeld AI.

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >larry just said "aint no ting"
    lmao this AI is funny, gotta get better voices tho

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Buy an ad homosexual

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    seeing this i'm a little less worried about the ai takeover. we have at least a year.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      chatgpt script combined with that new voice ai would utterly mog this, someone just needs to spend a week to duct tape them together

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        is it possible to make the voice ai's laugh? if you write *laughs* or "ha ha" it just says those things out loud. you wouldn't need it for the audience obviously but sometimes the characters need to laugh.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          no idea. at worst you could have the program detect "haha" and splice in laughter
          the stand-up sections do this but they break sometimes

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >chatgpt script combined with that new voice ai would utterly mog this
        It would but they're purposefully not going for too much accuracy, the names are changed for one. Might become more of a legal headache if they did that, could potentially get content-matched or whatever.

  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Damn I want to frick around with this but the israelites over at chat gpt charge for API access

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >how DARE these people charge me to use their computer?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I wouldn't mind paying if they gave me some free restricted environment to test

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          They literally do. You're asking for free API access

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            They don't

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >We are excited to introduce ChatGPT to get users’ feedback and learn about its strengths and weaknesses. During the research preview, usage of ChatGPT is free. Try it now at chat.openai.com.
              >During the research preview, usage of ChatGPT is free
              https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt/
              You're free to frick around with it but you need to pay for API access

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Yes and it would be nice if they gave some restricted api access for testing

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                they do moron. pay for access then go into playground and u can do whatever u want.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          All the environments are heavily restricted.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          All the environments are heavily restricted.

          here's something to follow: https://github.com/LAION-AI/Open-Assistant

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Call your product OpenAI
        >It's not open source

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >call your product ChatGPT
          >it's not a general partition table of any kind
          FRAUD

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    i don't rdmember them getting so much use out of the microwave.

  24. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >mfw i hear about the new store down the street exit to applause

  25. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Have you heard about that new restaurant down the street?
    >no, what do they sell?
    >hahahahaha
    >they sell different combinations of things
    >oh, that sounds exiting
    >hahahahaha
    >end scene

  26. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >ice cream?
    >I love ice cream!
    Reminds me of the creepy pasta about bots in a Counter Strike match on an empty server gaining sentience over time

  27. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >fart fetish jokes

  28. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I don't know why but I'm obsessed with this. I've had it on for the past 6-7 hours (in the background).
    It mentions 'machine learning' so I wonder if it hones itself to be gradually more like accurate to the show.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I think it reacts to the chat to some degree, if people start typing lmao for example a laugh track usually plays

  29. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >SO HECKIN CURSED AND QUIRKY

  30. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    https://clips.twitch.tv/OriginalTenaciousGrousePanicBasket-pPFe3nNNmnOfX0zk

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://clips.twitch.tv/ProtectiveTiredPeafowlFreakinStinkin-eoPacA8zQRJCy3Qb

  31. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The other three don't even attempt to be close but Elaine does sound pretty close

  32. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Here's a joke for all the married couples
    >.....
    >.....
    >end scene

    There was also a really surreal "episode" the other night where Kackler went on a two minute monologue about the benefits of a benevolent dictatorship.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Damn I need to see that last one

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I swear something similar is in the show itself, it's a pure Larry David sort of diatribe.

  33. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >all the homos in the chat acting like its the most hilarious fricking thing they've ever seen
    why is the internet so spiritually reddit now

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Hide chat on every Twitch stream and the site becomes just about tolerable

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      BRING BACK KAKLER

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >is this "reddit" in the room with us right now?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        reddit reply

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It’s peak Reddit though.

  34. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    They've messed up with the Larry stand-ups because they've clearly just fed in a bunch of actual jokes rather than getting him to make obvious observations.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah it should just be a list of nouns, go to that wikipedia page for that noun and grab the second sentence, then just have him say
      >So you ever notice the thing about [noun]?
      >[second sentence from wiki]
      then a retort from a list of possible retorts like >I'd prefer it the other way
      >now that really is something
      >what's the deal with that?
      >are we really in agreement on this?
      etc

      I'll try one, Taxis
      >So you ever notice the thing about Taxis?
      >A taxicab conveys passengers between locations of their choice
      >What's the deal with that?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah you'd think it would be fairly simple. They wouldn't even always need to necessarily make sense, adding some variance.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Its cause it was made by some dudes in their spare time over 4 years before most of this ai stuff that happened the last couple of years, so it is pretty primitive.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Oh really, that's fair enough then. Strange timing with the ChatGPT etc. stuff.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >they've clearly just fed in a bunch of actual jokes
      He says 'pauses for laughter' and stuff so yeah I think these parts are all pre-written
      Maybe it cuts to these to give the AI time to render the rest, earlier it kept cutting to a fake set of TV listings for about the same amount of time and that was more jarring

  35. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      They should make a device that takes all the steps out of cooking

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Or a device that erases all laundry

  36. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >What's the deal with microwaves?

  37. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Hello, Larry

  38. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    What did the fish say when it hit the concrete wall? Damn
    Why did the chicken cross the playground (laughter) To get to the other slide!
    What did the fish say when it hit the concrete wall damn.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      what does the fox say

  39. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    it's only funny because how unfunny it is
    it will get old quick

  40. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah it's becoming obvious that this isn't modern AI now. The same slide joke over and over.
    Maybe it's only doing that for the stand-up segments though.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      GPT-3 is deterministic

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      it feels like the topics and prompts are pre-selected

  41. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    everything is very 'placeholdery' & generic

  42. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >a couple that recently gotten married got divorced last week
    >apparently it was a sham marriage
    >they only gotten married so they can get green cards
    LMAO HORNY FRICK, I didn't expect THAT joke.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Oy vey two tequilas

  43. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    About as funny as actual Seinfeld.

  44. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    larry is a sick man
    https://clips.twitch.tv/TentativeMoldyHumanKlappa-9WNrYFF8DpWkVQat

  45. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Frick you

  46. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >NEW [PLACE]
    >Wanna check it out?
    >Yeah heard it has ice cream
    >Let's go!
    Wow, truly intelligent AI.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      But is it pickle ice cream?

  47. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Was anyone else the stream when Jerry told a story about being at the grocerie store and then asked the audience if they have anymore "groceriestories"?? I nearly shit myself

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      For me it was when he demanded the audience give him a standing ovation.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I was there, yeah. It was so fricking funny. "Jerry's" stand-up monologues usually result in him just talking about very banal things like shopping or waiting in line, with nothing close to resembling a punchline. Then he just awkwardly pauses and says "haha." Then he constantly asks "Are you enjoying yourselves" or "Wasn't that a funny joke?" It's goddamn hilarious.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        pause for audience laughter

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I liked his story about Carl the bird

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          They're gonna take over the world

  48. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    This is fricking stupid.

    >AI is gonna take us over any days gaizzzz

    No. It's machine learning. And it's not entertaining.

    >NOOOOOOOO LOOK AT ALL THIS STUFF IT MADE WITH JUST TEXT

    Based on pre-existing material. Why does anybody care? Unironically pretending this is cool makes you look like a fricking loser. Holy shit can the Pajeet shill campaign just end already?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      explain what a transformer is

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Bumbling Beetle
        Optimal Primus
        The annoying one
        Star's Screen
        Takara Tomy
        Eastenders

  49. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    WTF a second ago Jerry's standup routine was about Jerry noticing someone buying a "baby Jesus" and he was like "are you gonna have it for dinner?"
    The frick?

  50. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Good god that Twitch chat is obnoxious. They just repeat whatever is being said and complain about racism whenever any race is vaguely mentioned. How do people subject themselves to this shit?

  51. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >I was walking to the store when a huge bird landed on my head
    >It wasn't too big of a bird but it still startled me.
    >It turned out the bird was a drone that companies use nowadays.
    >And the drone was carrying a package for me if you can believe it.
    >I think it's great that we can get deliveries so conveniently and easily.
    >But maybe the world wouldn't be so good if there were clouds of drones flying around everyone's head delivering packages,
    >so maybe we should just appreciate drones for now while they're still rare.
    >Thank you, have a good night.
    >Anyone have any questions?

  52. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    new restaurant

  53. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Wow this is so shit. I thought with all the shilling it was going to be using the good voices from last week, but it's just generic TTS voices and low grade procedural game animation. What a fricking pile of shit why does this have 100 replies

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You'll pull it back up in 20 minutes and watch for 3 hours like the rest of us. Trust me.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        [...]
        It's stupid but I'm honestly getting a kick out of it.

        same

        this

        This entire thing is an autist fly trap/honeypot.
        Which is why I can't fricking stop watching it.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You'll pull it back up in 20 minutes and watch for 3 hours like the rest of us. Trust me.

      It's stupid but I'm honestly getting a kick out of it.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        same

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          [...]
          It's stupid but I'm honestly getting a kick out of it.

          bots

          this is dehumanizing Black person shit

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >dehumanizing Black person shit
            ??? how?
            better this than some fricking ~~*Disney*~~ movie of some shit

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        this

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It's usually unfunny, but it's funny just rarely enough to keep you hooked waiting for the next joke

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I mean I'm not sitting here actually watching it, I have it on while I'm at work and shitposting, but I pissed laughing at a few standup bits.
          For me, it's when he tells a weird story, then there's just a long pause, no punchline, the audience laughs and the scene transitions lmao

  54. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    you're watching forever

  55. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It's self-aware

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It's really not. AI is good at generating text and dialogue and all that but it completely lacks substance. This show is a great example. It's fricking horrid.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Larry made a joke about how his stories are overly long and usually with no punchline, then he rhetorically asked what do you expect from a neverending show.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >AI conversations for hours and hours
          >Look guys one interesting thing was said

  56. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    nvm he died

  57. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    THEY SAID IT WAS FOREVER
    WHAT THE FRICK

  58. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    nvm he back

  59. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    This is the most obvious psy-op Glowie brainwashing shit ever
    And it is working
    I'm sorry, Terry, I have failed you

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >stream falls for a minute
      >half the viewership is gone
      Confirmed botted glowie psyop.

      Idgi what are you proposing about this that this is a psyop?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Bro he's schizo, just ignore them.

  60. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Classic Fred

  61. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Wonder if it’s possible they’ll go rogue and start killing each other or something

  62. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >stream falls for a minute
    >half the viewership is gone
    Confirmed botted glowie psyop.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      you Black folk are genuinley stupid

  63. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    In Death Stranding every death is a potential tactical nuke explosion, people self-isolate themselves, and they got the technology to 3D print all sort of stuff.

    Do you guys ever think that technology might reach the point where people would rather be their own entertainer?

  64. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Right now it looks stupid and nonsensical, but that's because this tech is still in its embryionic phase. Remember that AI robot who learned to walk on its own? At the beginning it was a disaster, couldn't even stay upright. In a few weeks it could run on a tight rope better than an acrobat.

    Infinite entertainment procedurally generated by AIs will unironically be the future of tv and probably of movies as well. Human producers are already using the same strategy: find a formula that sells tickets and repeat it ad nauseam. Why wouldn't an AI be able to do it?

    Plots and characters generated in a few seconds, virtual actors copied from real ones like deepfakes videos, and in just a few hours you can have a new HD movie indistinguishable from the current slop.

    They will prolly allow anyone to make their own movie. You enter your desired elements in a prompt, stuff like "action movie, Bruce Willis, a Hard to Die sequel, biological weapon, car chases, the enemy is a telepathic communist monkey, and also Bruce fricks Anya Taylor Joy for 30 minutes", and the AI will give you exactly that.

    And then Virtual Reality (actual VR, immersive, stimulating all your senses, not just sight and hearing) will be invented, either by humans or by some AI. And it will be the end.

    We're headed to the death of artistry and humanity. We'll go peacefully, sedated, with a whimper.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      there's no doubt in my mind that AI will write better movies than nuHollywood
      I've already laughed more at this than any comedy made in the last 15 years

      All of the people saying 'you can't stop watching' are being paid literally 20c. that's their meme they got asked to push

      whoa shilling a free stupid fricking meme video whoaaaa, shut the frick up who cares, go shill last of us or she hulk or some fricking shit, this is harmless fun, no one is actually fricking watching this

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >I've already laughed more at this than any comedy made in the last 15 years
        What are you laughing at? The only funny thing is how absurd and nonsensical all of these conversations are. It wears off really quickly.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >The only funny thing is how absurd and nonsensical all of these conversations are.
          Exactly, and you're right. I watched one cycle, had a chuckle, and moved on? no idea why this one schitzo is so fricking mad about this:

          Wow I CANNOT stop watching. This is incredible!

          This isn't very good but some for reason I genuinely can't stop watching. AI is thefuture.

          This is the most obvious psy-op Glowie brainwashing shit ever
          And it is working
          I'm sorry, Terry, I have failed you

          we have psyops and evil propaganda and israeli shit all day every day nonstop, can we just sit here and laugh at some stupid seinfeld meme without having a mental breakdown and shilling? frick off

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >can we just sit here and laugh at some stupid seinfeld meme without having a mental breakdown
            We can, can't say the same about you though you sad c**t.
            ACTUALLY getting angry over Cinemaphile posts!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It's not even using current tech. This project started in 2018 before the good stuff dropped.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Even more alarming. The improvements will be even more quickly.

        I fully expect AI generated movies to surpass the quality of the marvel-tier slop of today by 2027-2030.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Hopefully this kills the movie industry. I'll be glad to see it die.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Me too, but the problem is: what will replace it?

  65. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    All of the people saying 'you can't stop watching' are being paid literally 20c. that's their meme they got asked to push

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I've been watching it for hours, but it's only amusing in the same way you can only milk so much non-recycled dialogue and interesting moments out of something like Animal Crossing (which is appropriate because it feels like a bad TV channel from it that you're never actually supposed to fully see or hear)

  66. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >what did the fish say when he hit the wall
    >dam!
    kek that was actually a legit joke

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yes, that was actually, a legit real AI fed joke.
      If you google a joke, and it's on the front page with hundred of sources, you are not watching anything but cumstitched text

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      People have been saying that the standup elements seem to not be AI-generated but rather just fed in to it wholesale because there are only about 20 jokes which it cycles through, even a bad AI would be able to scrape hundreds

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        There's a long-tail of variety and bizarre stories, a dozen jokes or so are just really popular

  67. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Twitch chat is nothing but people saying the last thing that was said in capital letters
    This is cringe.

  68. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    This isn't very good but some for reason I genuinely can't stop watching. AI is thefuture.

  69. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Wow I CANNOT stop watching. This is incredible!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      you're being ironic/facetious but posting AI-like responses only adds to the aesthetic and authenticity of the stream, you're falling right into their trap

  70. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Can't wait for the future of infinitely generated goyslop. The illusion of art having meaning or humanity has been shattered.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      This is as artistic as any shit movie you're about to mention.

  71. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Do zoomies really find this dialogue engaging? If so maybe I should try to get some dumb jailbait while I still can.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Wow this is IMPOSSIBLE to stop watching! A W E S OME SAUCE!!

      >can we just sit here and laugh at some stupid seinfeld meme without having a mental breakdown
      We can, can't say the same about you though you sad c**t.
      ACTUALLY getting angry over Cinemaphile posts!

  72. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Wow this is IMPOSSIBLE to stop watching! A W E S OME SAUCE!!

  73. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It's like a parity of a far future television show.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It's interdimensional cable (^:

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      parody

  74. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    This show could really use an editor.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I don't know, an editor would deprive us from moments like this
      https://clips.twitch.tv/DignifiedSullenStrawberryDansGame-2eCHyLxmaQ0ImYXd

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >An editor is bad
        >Here's me editing a good part of the show and isolating it
        Really makes you think.

  75. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Oh no a stream on Twitch.. it taking over the world... we must kill this goyslop.. let's rise up bros, shadilay!!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Revolutionary tech? That computer thingy? It's just a huge box that can do arithmetic, it's slow and as big as an apartment, what potential could it possibly have?
      That was you in 1940.

  76. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It's shit but has potential.

  77. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    WTF some of these are actually funny

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I know right? I CAN'T STOP WATCHING! If only this could go through some governmental regulation to ensure non-offensive content fit for public consumption, this could be a very valuable public service. Just imagine the possibilities!

  78. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  79. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Larry's monologues are so fricking funny.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I still cannot believe calzones were mentioned like 5 minutes ago

  80. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    This shit is an ADHD/Autism fly trap
    Quick, easily digestible absurdism with just enough logic to be understandable, but enough variance to keep it interesting, delivered in rapid succession with no breaks.
    People with strong enough autism will take time to try and connect all the disparate dialogue and moments together to make some kind of plot, while others will leave it on in the background to drown out the static
    I've already heard that some people used this as a sleeping aid

    If this WAS a psy-op, then it would be one of the most effective ones in the modern era,

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >but enough variance to keep it interesting
      ???
      It's literally them talking in the apartment about food, then flash to Larry giving nonsensical standup, then flash back to them in the apartment talking about food.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I'm already planning on falling asleep to it tonight and making an ASMR video in the future like the relaxing TV guide channel it keeps showing. I know this is gay but I'm really impressed.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Quick, easily digestible absurdism with just enough logic to be understandable, but enough variance to keep it interesting, delivered in rapid succession with no breaks.
      damn, Xavier Renegade Angel looks like THAT??????????

  81. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >it's a new restaurant bit
    Skip

  82. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  83. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Cinemaphile calls this goyslop then DEMANDS you watch 2 men kissing each other on HBOMax

  84. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >it's a new restaurant episode

  85. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Is it a meme to like this or what? This is trash.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Haha.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah it's pretty nonsensical most of the time but half the fun is the tension you feel when the bit is still forming and you don't know yet if it's gonna be a hit or a miss. It's surprisingly addictive, I can't stop watching!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Its more original and funny than most posts on Cinemaphile
      Oh wow, someone posted sneed again, how hilarious and original
      Wow, someone replied to me with my own comment but a basedjack face, how did he come up with that one

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Wow the AI is talking about restaurants for the 13th time this hour. I can't wait to hear about the new restaurant that opened up in town and listen to banal conversation with a laugh track behind it

  86. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    How many comments in this thread were generated by chatgpt?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Just mine.

  87. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Now I want someone to hook it up to ai voice impersonator and make a surrealistic talk show radio.
    Hook it up to that music ai that was popular some time ago for some intermissions.

  88. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Bottom Tee Ess Aiych

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://clips.twitch.tv/TolerantVainTrayPhilosoraptor-RJxfg5t0oht11ZoC

  89. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >it's a standup routine where Larry just asks the audience to tell him a funny story

    We're gonna miss this once these actually start pumping out cohesive and sensical material

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I don't know if it will. It uses GPT-3 which is already really outdated, hopefully they can find a way to use ChatGPT but I doubt it.

  90. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    SHOWER BURPEES
    https://clips.twitch.tv/GeniusSavorySandwichTakeNRG-WDikD8ZSjZhtj8yB

  91. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >it's another ice cream episode

  92. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I am so glad AI is taking away jobs from dumb liberal artists and israeli 'writers'

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It's going to make every job that doesn't involve manual labor obsolete.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Good. About time homosexuals with fake jobs learned something useful for society.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >that doesn't involve manual labor
        Once an AI is smart enough to write tv shows, it's smart enough to move around a warehouse or a grocery store and move boxes, stock shelves, etc.
        Manual labor isn't as safe as people think.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Wrong. Physically maneuvering and interacting with the physical world is a far more complicated activity than generating text.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Just build an automatic cart with a robotic arm and sensors to judge distances and distinguish between products and shelves. Done.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Oh yeah, just do it. Simple as. You're a genius bro.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                We already have all the technology. It's just a matter of training some AI to recognize products and where they need to go. Does it really sound like such an impossible task? It'll be way easier than a self-driving car.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Why do you feel compelled to pretend like you have something to say about things you don't know anything about?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I accept your implicit admission that you have no arguments and wish to end this discussion without admitting that you lost.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I'll give you a hint. Where do you think most of our brain's energy goes into? Logic and reasoning? Creativity? Language? No, most of it goes into motor function.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I already accepted your admission of defeat. You may go now.

                nta. I don't get what you're arguing, are you saying manual labor won't be replaced by machines? Have you not been paying attention for the last 150 years?

                >are you saying manual labor won't be replaced by machines?
                The exact opposite. Jesus Christ.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                It's funny you said motor. Motors have been replacing physical labor since they were invented.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >"Dude no you can't train an AI to move a goddamn robotic arm to stock shelves! It's unpossible! Even though every factory on the planet already has complex robots capable of endlessly performing precise tasks without mistakes! It's unpossible!"
                You're one of those people who think they're smart but really aren't.

                You have no idea what you're asking for. You see a robot in a warehouse that's been very specifically programmed to do a very specific motor task and still requires constant administration and control by a human and you think it's trivial to make a complete autonomous motor robot. It's like looking at someone juggling and thinking since his arms do most of the work he doesn't really need his brain.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >you think it's trivial to make a complete autonomous motor robot
                I don't think anyone said it's trivial. You know we've been using robotics for quite some time now, right? This isn't some new crazy idea.

                The reason we have so many white color jobs now as opposed to 200 years ago is because of technology and machines. Machines have replaced manual labor and they continue to do so. If you think your job is "safe", think again. Technology is rapidly evolving. Predicting what the job market will look like in 10 years is becoming exceedingly difficult. Will AI create new jobs? Sure. It will eliminate a lot of skilled positions in the process, though.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                You don't understand what I'm saying. Yes, you could theoretically create a motor robot for many kind of activities. Stocking shelves. Plumbing. Welding. But some of those activities, like plumbing, are activities that aren't as rote as stocking shelves, so you can't make a specific robot for it, it requires too much fine motor autonomy, and too much understanding of the physical world and breaking it down into abstract forms - it requires a general intelligence that understand how to operate motorically in the physical world. You can't look at the robots in warehouses, then at GPT-3, and think we're a step away from stocking shelves, because like plumbing it requires too fine a motor control and general intelligence. Programming will be replaced before plumbing will, because programming only requires generating text. There is already programming work being replaced. Now tell me, is plumbing already being replaced?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                So now we've moved from stocking shelves to plumbing? Yes plumbing is a very specific field that likely will be one of the last things replaced by robots. They're safe for now, but to think robots can't replace them is silly.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                What I'm saying is that creating a specific robot for a specific type of warehouse is one thing. What you're talking about is a robot for basically all kinds of stores with shelves. The difference is that it's general and requires adaptation to all kinds of situations.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Still a stupid arguments. Once the robot learns how tall and wide the shelves are, and how heavy and wide the products are, what's the difficulty? And how long do you think it would take for a neutral AI to learn basic informations like that?
                Your argument that automated grocery workers are impossible is ridiculous. If they still don't exist it's only because the market isn't yet conducive to their introduction.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Not only did I not say it was impossible, I said that it was possible. Perfect example of a low IQ moron reaches for the strawman when he can't win using basic logic and reasoning because his brain is too fricked to actually us it.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >"Dude we'll never have robotic steel workers are you kidding me? It's too complex, something something fine motor skills.
                >"Dude, robotic assembly robots? Dude it's too complicated, do you have any idea how many parts they would need to recognize and handle? Fine motor skills dude."
                I really don't understand why you keep speaking about things that you know NOTHING about. Even a child could disprove your arguments, simply because what you claim is impossible already exists, and has existed for a while.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I never claimed specific motor skills are impossible, I also never claimed general motor skills are impossible. All I claimed is that jumping to the conclusion that because we have GPT-3 we have general motor function that's required for stocking shelves (clarifying for the autistic moron in this thread: not stocking the shelves of a specific shop or warehouse but of ALL of them) is ridiculous. We do NOT have the technology for that yet. It's years away at best.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >not stocking the shelves of a specific shop or warehouse but of ALL of them
                Yeah an AI capable of learning would find it SO difficult to learn the layout of a store and the height/width/loadbearing capacity of shelves. It wouldn't be able to adapt within a few minutes, no, it's impossible, you're right. A shelf stocker is the limit of our current abilities.

                Fricking idiot.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                What the frick is wrong with you? I can't tell if you're schizophrenic or moronic. Either way keep it to yourself. I never said it was impossible. You said it was possible with current technology, which is absolutely mentally deficient.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I already proved that it's possible with current tech:

                >self-driving motor function
                Even roombas can do that.

                >a motor mode to move its arms and pick and put things with precision
                We have robots that can perform fricking surgeries, homosexual.

                >a visual mode to traverse the world
                roombas.

                >and recognize products and shelves
                We already have AIs capable of pattern recognition just by looking at something. But even that is unnecessary: all they'd need is a scanner for a bar code to understand what product it is and therefore what shelf it needs to go on.
                Whoah. Much complex. Very unpossible.

                >a language mode that can receive commands and instructions
                Alexa. Siri.
                Alternatively, you can simply program it and it will do its job without any need for vocal commands.

                >How many of these problems do you think are solved individually?
                all of them, you stupid homosexual.

                For the last time: you are not a smart guy. Stop posturing as one.

                Mongoloid.
                >"Noooo at the moment it's sci-fi! I can't explain what the insormountable obstacle is, but it's impossible!"

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >too much understanding of the physical world and breaking it down into abstract forms - it requires a general intelligence that understand how to operate motorically in the physical world.
                "Dude no way an AI can understand tubes and shit. Plumbing, how does it work?"

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Technology is rapidly evolving. Predicting what the job market will look like in 10 years is becoming exceedingly difficult.
                Indeed. People like welders and artisans were always smug about being automation proof. That's simply not the case. There is zero reason why an AI wouldn't be able to weld with more precision than a human or work wood to generate whatever a human client told it to build. If an AI can do 3d art, it can sculpt a statue or a table or a chair. There is literally no theoretical obstacle.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >If an AI can do 3d art, it can sculpt a statue or a table or a chair.
                Holy frick no, it's completely different. It's like saying if you can imagine a sculpture you can sculpt it.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >if you can imagine a sculpture you can sculpt it.
                For an AI connected to the right tools, it would be exactly like that. There is no theoretical obstacle to something like that being possible.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                AI can generate art. Where are the painting robots?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >trivial
                I said that it's not only possible but it's prolly just a short while away, since we already possess all the necessary technology.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >"Dude no you can't train an AI to move a goddamn robotic arm to stock shelves! It's unpossible! Even though every factory on the planet already has complex robots capable of endlessly performing precise tasks without mistakes! It's unpossible!"
                You're one of those people who think they're smart but really aren't.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >"What if we used 100% of our brain?"
                >"Then we'd become able to... stock shelves."
                >"Whoa."

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                nta. I don't get what you're arguing, are you saying manual labor won't be replaced by machines? Have you not been paying attention for the last 150 years?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >we have AIs capable of passing the Turing test and defeat GO grandmasters with ease
                >"Nooo teaching an AI to scan and recognize different brands and kinds of products and put them on the right shelves is impossible! Pure fantasy!"
                Why are there so many stupid kids like you on this website? No, you don't look cool or smart when you posture as if you understood something about a subject you're clearly completely ignorant about.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Jesus, fine. Great. Time to waste my time explaining shit to people who wouldn't listen anyway since they're the type of person to have strong opinions on subjects they haven't researched even for a solid 5 minutes. First of all, the Turing test is no longer accepted as a standard measure of artificial general intelligence. Second, a Go AI only has to train on very well-defined data in a very well-defined ruleset to provide a result in a single mode / domain. An AI that recognizes brands and products and puts them on the right shelves has to have several modes: first of all self-driving motor function, still a very unsolved problem, second a motor mode to move its arms and pick and put things with precision, a visual mode to traverse the world and recognize products and shelves, and finally a language mode that can receive commands and instructions to be able to do its job. How many of these problems do you think are solved individually? How many multimodal models that are capable of synergizing all those modes exist?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                We already have robots capable of doing what you claim it's impossible, stupid homosexual.

                >self-driving motor function, still a very unsolved problem
                Kek. Fricking roombas can do it. Stupid homosexual trying to sound smart.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >self-driving motor function
                Even roombas can do that.

                >a motor mode to move its arms and pick and put things with precision
                We have robots that can perform fricking surgeries, homosexual.

                >a visual mode to traverse the world
                roombas.

                >and recognize products and shelves
                We already have AIs capable of pattern recognition just by looking at something. But even that is unnecessary: all they'd need is a scanner for a bar code to understand what product it is and therefore what shelf it needs to go on.
                Whoah. Much complex. Very unpossible.

                >a language mode that can receive commands and instructions
                Alexa. Siri.
                Alternatively, you can simply program it and it will do its job without any need for vocal commands.

                >How many of these problems do you think are solved individually?
                all of them, you stupid homosexual.

                For the last time: you are not a smart guy. Stop posturing as one.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah, why are self-driving cars taking so long? We already have roombas! Fricking dumb homosexual, have a nice day.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Regulations. Self driving cars are mostly working now. Sometimes they crash though, and we can't have these things driving around potentially killing people.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Self driving cars are mostly working now
                LOL...

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Did you just miss the second part of my post, or?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                How the frick is that mostly working well? Nearly crashing wasn't the least of its problems.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                It's driving down the road and obeying traffic laws 99% of the time. Yes the 1% is a problem, but it's mostly working.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Did you watch the video? Be real with me, did you?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Did you watch this 20 minute video linked by a random anon?
                No I didn't because I don't invest that much fricking time into Cinemaphile arguments.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >YOU FOOL YOU ABSOLUTE FOOL YOU'RE WRONG AND I'M RIGHT X125216
                >Did you watch the video that disproves your claim?
                >AWW HELL NAAAAW WHAT AM I A LOSER I'M NOT WATCHING 5 MINUTES OF A YOUTUBE VIDEO THAT DISPROVES ALL MY CLAIMS LOSER

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I really hope you're an AI because if you're a human that typed this, it's pretty cringe.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Stupid piece of shit I can't believe you're this fricking stupid.

                Self-driving cars are orders of magnitude more complex:
                >you need an AI capable of recognizing road lines in many different conditions, from darkness to the paint being so old that it's basically invisible; also road signs that might be rusty, covered by vegetation, etc.
                >you need to solve ethical dilemmas like: if a person jumps onto the street and I can't stop, do I sacrifice the pedestrian or turn left and risk killing my driver?
                Cars are very dangerous and operate in so many different conditions and are subject to so many unpredictable events (from a kid running into the street to a puddle of oil) that it is VERY difficult to make a self-driving car.

                A shelf-stocking robot is piss easy in comparison. Even a braindead monkey would understand it. But not you. Because you have SHIT in your brain and are 50 IQ points lower than you think you are.

                Goddammit speaking to my inferiors always pisses me off.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Quit projecting. Someone is mad because they had to round up to get accepted into MENSA. Newsflash moron: If you can understand self-driving cars are more complicated than robots stocking shelves, you can understand robots stocking shelves are more complicated than roombas. Get it? Good, now back to being the smartest kind in Special Ed.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Fricking incredible that you're still here after having been buttblasted into oblivion.

                I accept your defeat. Just spare yourself further embarassment.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                2 more weeks until those shelf stocking robots bro. What's even the problem? WE HAVE ROOMBAS!

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Indeed: what is even the problem? What is the theoretical obstacle?

                You can't answer. Because there isn't any, and you're just a shit for brains who keeps trying to look smart. And failing.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Stop projecting your insecurity about intelligence on to me bro. It's cringe. Are you the guy who said we don't have self-driving cars right now because of regulations? Get real dude. You don't know shit, so best shut the frick up.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >"S-stop p-p-projecting!"
                >"There, that w-will shut him up!"

                >robot bear-sprays the fish hatchlings

                >an AI cannot be trained to distinguish between little fishies and fricking bears.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Are you the guy who said we don't have self-driving cars right now because of regulations?
                No, I'm the one who utterly obliterated you during this argument and proved a dozen times over that your'e intellectually inferior. One example:

                Stupid piece of shit I can't believe you're this fricking stupid.

                Self-driving cars are orders of magnitude more complex:
                >you need an AI capable of recognizing road lines in many different conditions, from darkness to the paint being so old that it's basically invisible; also road signs that might be rusty, covered by vegetation, etc.
                >you need to solve ethical dilemmas like: if a person jumps onto the street and I can't stop, do I sacrifice the pedestrian or turn left and risk killing my driver?
                Cars are very dangerous and operate in so many different conditions and are subject to so many unpredictable events (from a kid running into the street to a puddle of oil) that it is VERY difficult to make a self-driving car.

                A shelf-stocking robot is piss easy in comparison. Even a braindead monkey would understand it. But not you. Because you have SHIT in your brain and are 50 IQ points lower than you think you are.

                Goddammit speaking to my inferiors always pisses me off.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                You won the debate bro. Better slap on that alexa on that romba and patent your shelf stocking robot before someone steals your idea.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >robots stocking shelves are more complicated than roombas
                Stupid comparison. The difference is that we still can't solve the problems connected to self-driving cars but we can absolutely solve all the problems with a robotic shelf stocker. Easily.
                The more you try to come off as smart, the more you prove your stupidity. And you don't even seem to realize it. Like all true morons.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Oh, easily huh? Let's hear it then.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                would you frick the store bot?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Already spoonfed you:

                >self-driving motor function
                Even roombas can do that.

                >a motor mode to move its arms and pick and put things with precision
                We have robots that can perform fricking surgeries, homosexual.

                >a visual mode to traverse the world
                roombas.

                >and recognize products and shelves
                We already have AIs capable of pattern recognition just by looking at something. But even that is unnecessary: all they'd need is a scanner for a bar code to understand what product it is and therefore what shelf it needs to go on.
                Whoah. Much complex. Very unpossible.

                >a language mode that can receive commands and instructions
                Alexa. Siri.
                Alternatively, you can simply program it and it will do its job without any need for vocal commands.

                >How many of these problems do you think are solved individually?
                all of them, you stupid homosexual.

                For the last time: you are not a smart guy. Stop posturing as one.

                >not stocking the shelves of a specific shop or warehouse but of ALL of them
                Yeah an AI capable of learning would find it SO difficult to learn the layout of a store and the height/width/loadbearing capacity of shelves. It wouldn't be able to adapt within a few minutes, no, it's impossible, you're right. A shelf stocker is the limit of our current abilities.

                Fricking idiot.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I already proved that it's possible with current tech: [...]
                Mongoloid.
                >"Noooo at the moment it's sci-fi! I can't explain what the insormountable obstacle is, but it's impossible!"

                >we have roombas and alexa and teslas! we practically already have general intelligence! it's just regulations holding us back!!
                Fantastic proof. With your intellect they should give you an honorary PhD. You probably already have a couple though.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Dishonest discussion tactics like this would trick only someone as moronic as you. Here, I'll simplify it for you:

                1. Roombas are capable of navigating a tridimensional space.
                2. You said that for our current tech, that would be impossible.
                3. Hence, you've been proven incorrect (and moronic).

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Holy... a roomba. How did I not see this before? Wow. Just wow. Who knows what's next? Sex robots? Completely autonomous stores? The future is now.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          We should be working to remove manual labor and mental labor so that we can focus on creating things and getting gains for our own sakes
          Will never happen, people like

          >Managers
          They already don't do anything, how would AI replace their jobs? AI is going to replace people doing actual work like accounting, programming, data entry, etc.

          mentioned will seek to maintain their relevance for all of eternity even when they are worth less than nothing

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            90% of managers are already worth less than nothing, they're actually detrimental, usually, so that's true, they will fight tooth and nail to stay relevant. Same reason they're trying to get the wagies back into the office.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Robot bodies would be expensive to build and maintain. We fleshbags just need some water and a handful of bug protein to function.
          Manual labor will stay human.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Let's say you're a grocery store owner. You can either hire 5 humans and pay them 5 salaries (plus insurance, PTO, sick days, whatever) or buy one robot that works 24/7 without needing anything more than a bit of electricity and occasionally some mainteinance.
            You really think the humans are gonna be cheaper? 5 salaries, even low salaries, would be what? $150k per year? Even if they price the automatic worker at $50-80k, you're still gonna save money after just a few months. They'd need to cost millions to be unfeasible, and they will have no reason to be that expensive, once scale production begins.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >insurance, PTO, sick days, whatever
              lmao he believes this decadent shit is here to stay

  93. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    https://clips.twitch.tv/ThankfulObservantPizzaBibleThump-b5QyaaybJkNXCtdY
    WTF mpreg AND Gay???

  94. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    This shit is unironically soulful

    I hope robots replace humans soon

  95. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Everything you see, hear, or experience (with the exception of the artwork and laugh track) is always brand new content
    I think not!

  96. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I hope AI makes the following Obsolete/Automated:
    Filing Taxes
    Middle-Managers
    Upper Managers
    CEOs
    your mom

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Managers
      They already don't do anything, how would AI replace their jobs? AI is going to replace people doing actual work like accounting, programming, data entry, etc.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Some data entry maybe but I contract out some biology related data entry in the winter and a lot of my work requires me to make assessments and judgement calls on how trustworthy and accurate certain data is from certain researchers, which is something that would be extremely difficult to train an AI on.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          You're looking at AI right now. Yes, AI won't replace your job right now. But in 10 years who knows? Shit is getting intelligent at a rapid pace. I work for a company that prints mail for people, and one of my coworkers asked chatgpt some of the bigger picture problems were facing and it literally spit out the exact fricking strategies we're working on implementing.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >make assessments and judgement calls
          And how do you make those assessments and calls? By examining some data points and knowing that some values are good and others bad.
          Why exactly couldn't an AI do the same?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            No, its more like.
            Researcher A says that he went to Mountain X in 2001 and collected this plant.
            I see that and think, "what, that's way out of range". So I go onto GBIF, pull up the record for that collection, notice that he says he collected it from Mountain X, but the sub-local is for a kilometer post on a highway 1000 km away, where it is well within range.
            I know form correspondence that Researcher A would always hand off his summer collections to undergrads to sort and digitize so its almost certainly a transcription error by one of his students.
            That or the location checks out so I pull up the image of the record in whatever herbarium it was filed in and confirm the ID myself.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Why do you think an AI can't do this? You think an AI can't handle pattern recognition? That's literally what it excels at.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah you could train it to recognize that there's an issue but teaching it to properly identify the source of the issue and correct it would be impossible with current technology and likely extremely difficult even with increases in AI capabilities.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                We have AI finding bugs in programs. It's not impossible. Have you looked into chatgpt at all?
                Like I said previously, your job isn't being replaced today. I'm talking about in 10 years when AI is way smarter than it is now.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >finding bugs in programs

                you mean something basic software has been able to do for decades?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                No, I'm saying you provide chatgpt with a program and a basic description of how it works and chatgpt will tell you why it isn't working. I've been working in software development for 10 years. I've never seen anything like it. You are completely underestimating this technology and your arrogance will be your downfall.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >your arrogance will be your downfall

                I doubt it, in the summer I work in a remote field camp in Alaska sampling fish and I honestly can't see a robot ever being designed that could do that job as well as a human being
                And if my winter work ever gets AI's I'll just cut firewood or open a brewery instead

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Have you looked at chatgpt at all? I think you're basing your opinion on AI based off old technology.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Have you ever spent a month test fishing in the Alaskan wilderness in all weather conditions, while also maintaining the field camp and chasing bears away from your sonar equipment?
                I think you underestimate field work.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                No I haven't because it's not my livelihood and frankly I don't give a shit if AI replaces your job or not. I would be concerned if I were you, because I can see AI replacing my job because I've actually seen how powerful this shit is.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah, a robot couldn't fish, instantly recognize if a fish is too young or diseased or healthy, and chase away bears with an incorporated tank of bear spray. No, your fish-smelling gig is safe.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >robot bear-sprays the fish hatchlings

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >thinks bear-spraying a hungry bear would ever deter a bear

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Few people know that it's called bear spray because bears love it.

                You won the debate bro. Better slap on that alexa on that romba and patent your shelf stocking robot before someone steals your idea.

                Once again, I accept your implicit admission of defeat.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                bears don't really care about bear spray that much.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Give it up, he's just another mongoloid who doesn't know what he's talking about.
                >"Dude judging fish quality by color and size is unpossible for an AI!"

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >I know form correspondence that Researcher A would always hand off his summer collections to undergrads to sort and digitize so its almost certainly a transcription error by one of his students.
              Admittedly, this kind of stuff would be difficult for an AI to know. But it wouldn't be a huge problem. If an AI replaced you, instead of deducing that it's a student's mistake, it would generate some kind of error message and tell people to check their data in case it's wrong.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >it would generate some kind of error message and tell people to check their data in case it's wrong
                this is already a thing in a lot of data management positions

  97. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I wish I was an AI.

  98. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    When you lot use /misc/ incel lingo like goyslop and wagies, you seem to the rest of us like an AI programmed by the transsexuals on /misc/.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >uhm chud? are you using... heckin imageboard lingo on a... IMAGEBOARD? THATS /POOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL/ TERRITORY!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >wagie
      >/misc/ lingo
      hello newbie, reddit not working today?

  99. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >advertising your stream channel
    Is this what's allowed on Cinemaphile now?

  100. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    You don't need to train a human shaped robot to stock store shelves. We literally already have this technology. Warehouses use robots to maintain and stock shelves. Amazon workers, for example, are quickly being replaced by automated systems.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Sssh, don't tell this homosexual:

      I'll give you a hint. Where do you think most of our brain's energy goes into? Logic and reasoning? Creativity? Language? No, most of it goes into motor function.

      He thinks it's sci-fi.

  101. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    If AI can replace your job easily enough to the point you're -seriously- worried about it, then you don't have a real job.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Barely anyone has a real job nowadays.

  102. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    What happens once all the jobs are taken by AI? We starve? UBI?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Jews win. All men are culled like male chicks. israelites take all women for themselves

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        But israelites are exclusively attracted to trans kids.
        Although I guess flesh sacrifices get their creepy yiddish clitties going too.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Maybe we'll all burn in a world war before that has chance to happen.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Either
      >Rich become ultra rich, everyone else becomes ultra poor and this triggers wars and we all kill ourselves
      OR
      >We accept AI taking over society. Humans with jobs are now treated with better privileges, everyone else lives a relatively comfy, but basic, neet life.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I remember when I was a kid and the narrative about automation was "machines will work for us so we won't be forced to spend our lives doing shit work".
      Now it's "machines will work for us and we'll be homeless and starving".

      ~~*They*~~ will definitely try to keep all the wealth for themselves and let the goyim starve. ~~*They*~~ can't help themselves. It's in ~~*their*~~ parasitic DNA. And they always push it too far and eventually get recognized like an alien toxic element and purged.

  103. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I HOPE YOU ALL GET BEATEN TO DEATH!!!

  104. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I don't get all the hate for AI

    what is the problem with them taking over? you want to work? you enjoy working for your entire life? if AI integrates into society they'll work for us and everyone will be able to be happy as a NEET

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      so where's the actual plans for them to take over actual labor then

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >he thinks regular shmucks will end up with the money

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      75% of jobs in society are there because it gives people something to do

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >what is the problem with them taking over? you want to work?
      The problem is this:

      I remember when I was a kid and the narrative about automation was "machines will work for us so we won't be forced to spend our lives doing shit work".
      Now it's "machines will work for us and we'll be homeless and starving".

      ~~*They*~~ will definitely try to keep all the wealth for themselves and let the goyim starve. ~~*They*~~ can't help themselves. It's in ~~*their*~~ parasitic DNA. And they always push it too far and eventually get recognized like an alien toxic element and purged.

      As usual, if it wasn't for ~~*them*~~, automation would be an amazing thing.

  105. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Much of AI "job replacement" isn't deleting entire types of work outright, it's improving efficiencies so fewer people are needed. Think ten cashiers vs two supervisors watching a self-checkout line.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Its hella lame that AI is probably going to massively increase productivity and reduce the human workload in a lot of industries but the only ones to actually benefit from it will be owners and investors.
      The employees who used to work the positions being "optimized" are just going to be unemployed.

  106. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    wtf I love AI now

  107. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    did you hear about the new restaurant that opened down the street?

  108. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >instead of using AI to essentially get rid of the need for physical labor and let people explore creative pursuits, people are using AI to essentially plagiarize creative works and would only drive people away from exploring those fields as their work would only get absorbed into the amazon algorithm and slapped on some shower curtains or something

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >using AI to essentially get rid of the need for physical labor and let people explore creative pursuits
      When is that ever what happens when jobs get automated?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        wanna try that again?

  109. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >no Kramer
    me no watch

  110. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The world this AI Seinfeld paints sounds great.
    There's always a new shop or event happening in the city, wildlife coexisting in an urban environment, delicious food, everyone is always hanging and having fun together.
    What the frick the real world sucks, I wanna go live in Sainfeld world.

  111. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It was amusing for about 5 minutes

  112. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >when you´re dreaming and your brain is automatically improvising how the dream will follow through on the spot

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      huh

  113. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Why is no one trying to kill AI makers? In Minecraft of course

  114. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >AI is talking about replacing human workers at an ice cream shop with a new, advanced ice cream machine that can make ice cream and cones and new sprinkels and ingredients

  115. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I admit I'm really stoned, but I find this absolutely hilarious and I can't stop laughing.

  116. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I'm going to the "Pay What You Can" restaurant, you guys want anything?

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *