Ad Astra is an okay film that had obvious issues during editing but I am certain there's a cut somewhere around that makes it on par with something like Bladerunner.
the original script is readily available online. basically they changed the entire last third of the film to make it more action-y and less nihilistic. deleted scenes are on the home video release but no director's cut, which is annyoing.
>the date we're collecting isn't matching our model >let's invent a new thing that takes up 96% of all matter that's invisible instead of saying our model is wrong
That's the whole point of "dark matter". It's a placeholder name for whatever the reason is that data doesn't match the model. Undetectable matter is just one possible explanation.
Another possible explanation is the model is incorrect. Why does science institution assume dark matter must be real and not that the model is invalidated and a new model is needed?
they already tested for all kinds of explanations, including that the entire model of gravity is wrong, but the most plausible explanation is still some kind of matter that doesnt interact with anything at all except that it exerts a lot of gravity and has always been there, even very distant galaxies in the early universe had very high dark matter concentrations that affected their gravitational binding, so it doesnt even dillute or clump up with eachother like normal matter would
The problem with the current models is Einstein's theory of relativity. Scientists have known for 50 years that it's not completely right because it conflicts with quantum mechanics, and dark matter is just an extension of that. Sure, it could be an invisible alien empire or some higher dimension material, but there's no way to know for sure until the next great scientist comes along with a unifying theory that actually explains it all precisely how it is
2 years ago
Anonymous
Too bad Dirac is dead. If anyone was going to mathematically explain all that shit as a unified equation, it was probably that autist.
time's flow isnt affected by gravity, speed, mass or light
the information is
like the information from school not reaching your brain cause you're the slow one
>It's been tested and documented
strapping two clocks to two different airplanes and then wondering why one is ever so slightly out of sync isn't a real experiment that proves anything anon lol
Particles moving at the speed of light reach their destination instantly. Time literally does not pass for the particle. The faster, or more dense, you are the closer you get to time not existing.
This is moronic thinking tbh. Like scientists really believe it’s gonna be something mindblowingly unfathomable? Ok. Sure. It’s definitely gonna be some kind of sentient animal. Even if it’s not carbon based it’ll have to fuel itself and reproduce so right there that limits it from being something totally unimaginable? What do you think, “IT” will show up? Even that alien from the gay ass nope movie is still like a creature on earth in every single way
It doesn't have to be an animal, it doesn't need to eat to fuel itself, necessarily, and it doesn't need to reproduce, not if it were like those jellyfish that get younger and then older indefinitely, only splitting into 2 jellyfish when it wants to. It could be so unrecognizable that you could look at it and not think it is life. We aren't even sure of the mental capacities of other things on this planet.
It would take us 4.3 years to get to the nearest star to our system if we traveled at light speed, the fastest we ever went in space was 3.7% of lightspeed. In all of our exploration of the nearest stars we have yet to find a trace of alien life. Even if we find it, we will never be able to communicate with them, let alone meet them because of how far away they would be. FTL transportation is science fiction, period.
To be fair, technological advances can go in strange ways. What is possible now could be seen as magic to people centuries ago. So you never know. Even though it looks impossible now. Human beings are just bad at predicting the future.
We're decent at projecting linear growth, but that's not how advancement in tech works. Someone comes up with a breakthrough and it changes everything, and no one can predict those because then they would be the one who came up with it.
The calculations were made, it's not possible to accelerate an object with mass to the speed of light because that would require infinite eneregy, and thats not even talking about going faster. The only viable proposition in the field right now is Alcubierre drive, and that requires negative energy, which is not a thing. Other drives require the mass equivalent energy of the entire Jupiter. Also not going to start on how astonishingly stupid
>bro even if there is something on the other side of the ocean, we could never swim there. It would take years and you would get exhausted. Even if you used a raft it would still sink and there’s no way you’d be able to get back home.
comparasion to the ocean is, educate yourself on the scale of the universe and if you cant comprehend it stop trying to sound smart.
>educate yourself on the scale of the universe
We don't need to cross the entire universe dipshit. Just the portion we need to get to where alien life is
2 years ago
Anonymous
You still don't understand, you don't need to look at the WHOLE universe to see that its unfathomably huge. Even getting to the aliens that are "close" in space terms means a couple generations of astronouts on a space ship making babies and raising them to make babies that will someday get to the destination.
2 years ago
Anonymous
No, I get it. Space travel is still unfeasible given our current technology. What your ignoramus brain keeps refising to acknowledge is the possibility, the likelihood, of technology evolving to make space travel feasible.
2 years ago
Anonymous
But technology advancements cant break physics. There is no such thing as infinite energy, and will never be, and that is required to take an object with mass accelerate to the speed of light in a vacuum.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>and that is required to take an object with mass accelerate to the speed of light in a vacuum
but that is only theorized. it may be incorrect and based flawed assumptions, since it cant be tested
2 years ago
Anonymous
doesn't e=mc squared prove this?
2 years ago
Anonymous
no
2 years ago
Anonymous
The laws of physics are interpretations of our observations. As such, they are not absolute. Dreamless morons such as yourself are useless
2 years ago
Anonymous
I'm not sure how we invent technology that allows us to travel faster than the speed of light. I'm all and willing to acknowledge technology always evolves but that's a bit far fetched at the moment. The only way we're ever getting anywhere else in the universe is if somehow wormholes or space tears exist.
You fricking moron.
The anon was comparing you to the luddites who, many hundreds of years ago, thought of the ocean as an insurmountable force of nature. Technology advanced beyond their current comprehension. Now we cross the oceans every day. We do it most often through the air, another travel method thought impossible up until even more recently.
"FTL" may be physically impossible, but functionally FTL is likely. You don't sound smart by repeating the same line that has been said endlessly since the dawn of recorded history.
"We will never achieve X for Y reason."
The universe is our birth right, and it will be claimed in the name of humanity.
Today we ponder interstellar travel, tomorrow it will be intergalactic. What's beyond that I'm not sure, but we will rise to meet that challenge all the same.
>bro even if there is something on the other side of the ocean, we could never swim there. It would take years and you would get exhausted. Even if you used a raft it would still sink and there’s no way you’d be able to get back home.
It has to do with the expansion of space. Even if we knew where aliens were AND could somehow travel at lightspeed it would still be impossible to reach anyone due to everything being so far away and ever expanding farther.
depends how far away they are, within this galaxy would easily be reachable. even neighboring galaxies.
space expands only at about 2 inches per lightyear per second, this expansion only becomes critical at distances in the millions of lightyears
>the fastest we ever went in space was 3.7% of lightspeed
what the hell are you talking about? no man made spacecraft has even reached 0.05% of the speed of light yet
The speed of light means that the further you get from earth the further you are looking into the past. A civilisation would need to be immensely more advanced than us just so we could even detect them, and this increases exponentially the further you get away from Earth. Our galaxy is 100,000 light years across, and we can barely look at other systems even 100 light years away with any detail. Even if by some miracle we detected an alien civilisation, communication with them would be another issue entirely.
he's a fricking grower not a shower are you a female by any chance you fricking roastie prostitute some men are GROWERS and we grow BIG you know the rules b***h
If someone had been there to capture the mass-energy conversion that occurred when Black Science Man was annihilated by this tweet, our energy problems would be solved.
A GRAIN OF SAND AT ARMS LENGTH
A GRAIN OF SAND AT ARMS LENGTH
A GRAIN OF SAND AT ARMS LENGTH
A GRAIN OF SAND AT ARMS LENGTH
A GRAIN OF SAND AT ARMS LENGTH
>So this is uh touched up right?
Yes the colors are fake since the images are taken in the infrared by the telescope.
It's photoshopped from some country (I forget which, Argentina maybe)? What's scary is that NASA passed it off as real.
>It's photoshopped from some country (I forget >What's scary is that NASA passed it off as real.
Take your meds. How can anyone believe such bullshit and function in their everyday life ?
It is a large amount of photos edited together, taken on top of a sky tracker tripod mount (to counteract the rotation of the earth), with a special camera lens that lets in more color and dissipates heat, and finally long exposures of multiple minutes + to capture more light (tripod prevents star trails in this regard). It can't be seen with the naked eye like this, but the image is still harvested using light travel.
humans cant exist in space and have never been outside the atmosphere. even the 'international SPACE station' is literlaly inside the atmosphere. not even close to the outer edge and inside thermosphere. these billionaire flights to 'space' didnt even come close to the ISS and were also inside the atmosphere by every conceivable definition.
wtf is wrong with you it's not about the atmosphere it's just because of the radiation belt, outside of that place the solar system is fairly survivable (supposedly), it's just that we have no business sending people nowhere
>made by the people who fumbled the biggest show ever and have been doing nothing since
Yeah I’m very excited too anon. Can’t wait to check it out on Netflix
Just because you have no experience with something negative, doesn't mean it isn't negative. You haven't been attacked by a hippopotamus, but you probably wouldn't want to get attacked by a hippopotamus.
>GoT was fumbled because they ran out of source material. > the series I'm looking to should be okay because the source material is complete.
You know nothing
This kinda creeps me out. I think clear pictures of the milky way are beautiful and wish I lived somewhere in the country so I could see it more often, but this picture is too much. It's like they're all staring at me.
>Space >Beautiful
In a eldritch kind of way that causes you to reflect on your smallness, perhaps. But if there is a god, I would argue it shows that he's not one we actually know or could understand.
Look man, when you're talking about space...*lights a cig*...I mean it's all numbers right? It's a numbers game, I mean let's face it, we're talking about a new age here, this is a new age. Thank you, next question
There is virtually no way to prove this image is legit >Just trust nasa bro
A company spends unfathomable ammounts of money, launches a rocket into space and places an artificial satelite on an orbit around l2 that you can spot yourself with a quality enough telescope and then proceedes to create physically and astronomically accurate space images from scratch for... what exactly? Just to frick with people and let the few that see through their lies feel more important?
People a lot smarter than me that have no association to nasa whatsoever looked at these pictures and haven't found a single detail out of place that would contradict the common knowledge. The relations between stars, gas clouds and whatever frickery they also see are explainable with aready existing explanations and calculations. This proves the images are accurate.
No they are not, the coloring and 3D rendering is entirely made up. There is no part of the universe that looks even remotely like that.
they are IR images that got normal color values assigned to different IR values by an alghoritm. No 3d rendering was used so idk where did you get that. Just because data is represented in a way thats easier for us to use its still the same data. The universe looks exactly like that when viewed in IR, apart from the colors. Nothing you said refutes the fact that the images are accurate physically and astronomically.
I believe what Bob Lazar says about the alien ships creating like a bubble around themselves in which they have no mass and kind of skating along as fast as they like on some kind of maglev effect with gravity.
The calculations were made, it's not possible to accelerate an object with mass to the speed of light because that would require infinite eneregy, and thats not even talking about going faster. The only viable proposition in the field right now is Alcubierre drive, and that requires negative energy, which is not a thing. Other drives require the mass equivalent energy of the entire Jupiter. Also not going to start on how astonishingly stupid [...] comparasion to the ocean is, educate yourself on the scale of the universe and if you cant comprehend it stop trying to sound smart.
the new Brian Cox docu-series Universe (2021) has some awesome cg sequences that are actually a bit unsettling, the visuals
and sound/music combined with Cox's perfect narration/cadence
>take picture of air >assign color so you can see the temperature differences >ummm akshually there is nothing there, it's all CGI, air literally does not exist
You'd have to be pretty fricking moronic to not believe the Holy Bible as fact, it covers every single known fact about the Universe and Earth with perfect accuracy.
>You'd have to be pretty fricking moronic to not believe the Holy Bible as fact
Which Bible? You realise there have been many different version with many different books, right?
Which generation of people got the right version?
Why the frick is every generation short-sighted and egotistical enough to think they're the ones born at just the right time? Every fricking time. Humans are moronic, man.
Ahahaha, they couldn't even get the Roman Emperors of the time correct. The Bible is cobbled-together horseshit mashed together with that homosexual Augustine's headcanon.
Watch a simulation of falling into a black hole. But Reddit moment aside, we are roughly as close to the largest object in the universe in size as the smallest. We have trillions of cells, billions of bacteria, complex brains, etc, we are a hyper complex system more fascinating than any galaxy.
Very cringe when people look to the sky and think we're small. We are like the gods of Olympus, and if there is a God the vast empty beauty of the universe exists for our pleasure alone.
The Holy Bible tells you: how the universe came to be, how the Earth came to be, how Man came to be, how animals came to be, what our purpose is and what goals and pursuits we should strive for.
Science: Has no idea how the universe formed. Has no idea why the Earth has water. Has no idea how life began. Invents invisible matter to fudge all their numbers. Claims aliens exist without proof, but for some reason this is not considered faith. Thinks life has no meaning or purpose but not the conviction to kill themselves, what are they afraid of?
>bronze age sheperds wrote that god created man from clay >scientists: hey wait a minute, it looks like it was more complicated than th- >YOU SCIENTISTS DONT HAVE ALL THE ANSWERS, WHY DONT YOU have a nice day
Not Cinemaphile but Outer Wilds (The indie game, not the gay Space RPG Obsidian made) is the one media I had where I felt it really captured the horrors of space and how inconsequential you are in it
It seemed so simple and childish I gave up and went back to Star Citizen before even leaving the planet. I’ll reinstall and check it out again based off your post.
Lynch's Dune movie perfectly encapsulates it. From the desert planets horrifying environment itself to the wildly alien cultures that humans evolved on different planets in isolation. It probably wasn't the intention of the film but it illustrates the very one sided relationship we have with the universe. No matter how hard we wish otherwise, we will change to accommodate its whimsy and there can never be peace because the universe itself isn't peaceful.
>You'd have to be pretty fricking moronic to not believe the Holy Bible as fact, it covers every single known fact about the Universe and Earth with perfect accuracy.
ad astra
Does it really? I've been looking for a modern space kino and I never knew what that was about . One of those movies that's name damaged its publicity
how exactly?
Loneliness is represented very well in the film. It's the theme of the movie.
Ad Astra is absolute garbage.
Frick you, Moon Pirates are cool.
This movie is Marvel 2.0. Skip it if you have a brain. Terrible movie.
>we went as far out as Neptune and determined that there are no aliens anywhere in the universe
fricking stupid movie
both of you are moronic
Ad Astra is an okay film that had obvious issues during editing but I am certain there's a cut somewhere around that makes it on par with something like Bladerunner.
the original script is readily available online. basically they changed the entire last third of the film to make it more action-y and less nihilistic. deleted scenes are on the home video release but no director's cut, which is annyoing.
Cringe movie but the shots of Neptune are actually pretty kino
ohnonononononono
?t=41
Absolute shit.
>"Accidentally" kills an entire crew
>No son, there isn't any life we checked the entire visible universe somehow
SHIT
space isn't real sweaty
here's your bingo card for the next 50 years
>the date we're collecting isn't matching our model
>let's invent a new thing that takes up 96% of all matter that's invisible instead of saying our model is wrong
this. I always hated this lazy explanation.
they're gonna find dark matter.
two more weeks.
well I dont't know about that, but i found some dank matter
IN YO MAMA'S ASS
That's the whole point of "dark matter". It's a placeholder name for whatever the reason is that data doesn't match the model. Undetectable matter is just one possible explanation.
Another possible explanation is the model is incorrect. Why does science institution assume dark matter must be real and not that the model is invalidated and a new model is needed?
they already tested for all kinds of explanations, including that the entire model of gravity is wrong, but the most plausible explanation is still some kind of matter that doesnt interact with anything at all except that it exerts a lot of gravity and has always been there, even very distant galaxies in the early universe had very high dark matter concentrations that affected their gravitational binding, so it doesnt even dillute or clump up with eachother like normal matter would
The problem with the current models is Einstein's theory of relativity. Scientists have known for 50 years that it's not completely right because it conflicts with quantum mechanics, and dark matter is just an extension of that. Sure, it could be an invisible alien empire or some higher dimension material, but there's no way to know for sure until the next great scientist comes along with a unifying theory that actually explains it all precisely how it is
Too bad Dirac is dead. If anyone was going to mathematically explain all that shit as a unified equation, it was probably that autist.
>It's a placeholder name
so it is God? Might as well just give up on science and go for Hinduism.
lots of assumptions there
time's flow isnt affected by gravity, speed, mass or light
the information is
like the information from school not reaching your brain cause you're the slow one
Time is most definitely affected by speed, dummy. It's been tested and documented
Time is not affected by anything. Gravity, speed, etc. alters the perception of time.
>It's been tested and documented
strapping two clocks to two different airplanes and then wondering why one is ever so slightly out of sync isn't a real experiment that proves anything anon lol
moron
Time isn't real
Entropy is; time is just how we measure its progress.
Particles moving at the speed of light reach their destination instantly. Time literally does not pass for the particle. The faster, or more dense, you are the closer you get to time not existing.
>likely impossible to detect or contact them
gonna need a sourceroni on that claimerino.
we have no idea what an alien species would look like. expecting them to function anything like us is just moronic
This is moronic thinking tbh. Like scientists really believe it’s gonna be something mindblowingly unfathomable? Ok. Sure. It’s definitely gonna be some kind of sentient animal. Even if it’s not carbon based it’ll have to fuel itself and reproduce so right there that limits it from being something totally unimaginable? What do you think, “IT” will show up? Even that alien from the gay ass nope movie is still like a creature on earth in every single way
It doesn't have to be an animal, it doesn't need to eat to fuel itself, necessarily, and it doesn't need to reproduce, not if it were like those jellyfish that get younger and then older indefinitely, only splitting into 2 jellyfish when it wants to. It could be so unrecognizable that you could look at it and not think it is life. We aren't even sure of the mental capacities of other things on this planet.
It would take us 4.3 years to get to the nearest star to our system if we traveled at light speed, the fastest we ever went in space was 3.7% of lightspeed. In all of our exploration of the nearest stars we have yet to find a trace of alien life. Even if we find it, we will never be able to communicate with them, let alone meet them because of how far away they would be. FTL transportation is science fiction, period.
To be fair, technological advances can go in strange ways. What is possible now could be seen as magic to people centuries ago. So you never know. Even though it looks impossible now. Human beings are just bad at predicting the future.
We're decent at projecting linear growth, but that's not how advancement in tech works. Someone comes up with a breakthrough and it changes everything, and no one can predict those because then they would be the one who came up with it.
The calculations were made, it's not possible to accelerate an object with mass to the speed of light because that would require infinite eneregy, and thats not even talking about going faster. The only viable proposition in the field right now is Alcubierre drive, and that requires negative energy, which is not a thing. Other drives require the mass equivalent energy of the entire Jupiter. Also not going to start on how astonishingly stupid
comparasion to the ocean is, educate yourself on the scale of the universe and if you cant comprehend it stop trying to sound smart.
the only solution is to move shit around it?
>educate yourself on the scale of the universe
We don't need to cross the entire universe dipshit. Just the portion we need to get to where alien life is
You still don't understand, you don't need to look at the WHOLE universe to see that its unfathomably huge. Even getting to the aliens that are "close" in space terms means a couple generations of astronouts on a space ship making babies and raising them to make babies that will someday get to the destination.
No, I get it. Space travel is still unfeasible given our current technology. What your ignoramus brain keeps refising to acknowledge is the possibility, the likelihood, of technology evolving to make space travel feasible.
But technology advancements cant break physics. There is no such thing as infinite energy, and will never be, and that is required to take an object with mass accelerate to the speed of light in a vacuum.
>and that is required to take an object with mass accelerate to the speed of light in a vacuum
but that is only theorized. it may be incorrect and based flawed assumptions, since it cant be tested
doesn't e=mc squared prove this?
no
The laws of physics are interpretations of our observations. As such, they are not absolute. Dreamless morons such as yourself are useless
I'm not sure how we invent technology that allows us to travel faster than the speed of light. I'm all and willing to acknowledge technology always evolves but that's a bit far fetched at the moment. The only way we're ever getting anywhere else in the universe is if somehow wormholes or space tears exist.
You fricking moron.
The anon was comparing you to the luddites who, many hundreds of years ago, thought of the ocean as an insurmountable force of nature. Technology advanced beyond their current comprehension. Now we cross the oceans every day. We do it most often through the air, another travel method thought impossible up until even more recently.
"FTL" may be physically impossible, but functionally FTL is likely. You don't sound smart by repeating the same line that has been said endlessly since the dawn of recorded history.
"We will never achieve X for Y reason."
The universe is our birth right, and it will be claimed in the name of humanity.
Today we ponder interstellar travel, tomorrow it will be intergalactic. What's beyond that I'm not sure, but we will rise to meet that challenge all the same.
>bro even if there is something on the other side of the ocean, we could never swim there. It would take years and you would get exhausted. Even if you used a raft it would still sink and there’s no way you’d be able to get back home.
It has to do with the expansion of space. Even if we knew where aliens were AND could somehow travel at lightspeed it would still be impossible to reach anyone due to everything being so far away and ever expanding farther.
depends how far away they are, within this galaxy would easily be reachable. even neighboring galaxies.
space expands only at about 2 inches per lightyear per second, this expansion only becomes critical at distances in the millions of lightyears
>the fastest we ever went in space was 3.7% of lightspeed
what the hell are you talking about? no man made spacecraft has even reached 0.05% of the speed of light yet
im at work so i might have gotten wrong data or fricked up simple math, sorry
they used dual nitrous setup
>FTL transportation is science fiction, period.
General relativity and quantum theory have not been successfully unified, period.
Only a nonwhite would have such limited scope of imagination
The speed of light means that the further you get from earth the further you are looking into the past. A civilisation would need to be immensely more advanced than us just so we could even detect them, and this increases exponentially the further you get away from Earth. Our galaxy is 100,000 light years across, and we can barely look at other systems even 100 light years away with any detail. Even if by some miracle we detected an alien civilisation, communication with them would be another issue entirely.
>folds piece of paper
problem?
The universe is constantly expanding at effectively faster than the speed of light.
Right now, you would already have to travel significantly faster than the speed of light to get anywhere
The more time passes, the further everything gets from each other, and the harder it is to travel.
In a few billion years it will be impossible to leave the galaxy at all.
Real life isn't sci-fi.
Life rare as frick, universe big as frick, odds of winning drastic go down
Scientists are hacks, thanks for confirming
>don't know how
>don't know why
>dont know what
>not exatcly
>somehow
>may
>believe
Yeah, trust the science goys
Black personMAN HELP ME
>There was no "before" the Big Bang. Time came into existence with it
Augustine figured this shit out 1500 years ago my guy
>blackhole's contain universe's
There's no way any scientist worth their snuff would ever seriously say something that stupid
I HECKING LOVE SCIENCE
>godless universe?
literally god there touching Adam's finger
holy shit. Is god molesting those babies?!
he's a small guy
he's a fricking grower not a shower are you a female by any chance you fricking roastie prostitute some men are GROWERS and we grow BIG you know the rules b***h
those are beef curtains
Adam was a trans F to M
>literally god there touching Adam's finger
>literally
>touching
>literally
you blind?
talking about the nebula which isnt a static image, you moron. The pic is a reference for faithless fools like you.
me on the left
>Me to the left of the upper left Cherub’s buttcheek.
God looks so comfy in his robe. Where do I get one?
I'd fricking shoot the fricker who posts Alien and thinks himself for it.
Special
But Alien is unironically the only movie that successfully does it.
None, because space will never inspire man in the same way God has, only when the two are reconciled will you get your spacekino
Event horizon has hell
Doesn't matter, had sex
Akshually its The Warp
Aniara
Poor captain.
gay homies from outta space
This scene from 2001: A Space Odyssey.
Neil btfo'd but Matt failed that ratio.
what ratio
I still have no idea what this means. Fricking zoomers.
>failed that ratio
???
pretty deep for Norm
Norm was actually one of the smartest person ever
A modern Diogenes
Just discovered him huh?
Well? What's the word?
If someone had been there to capture the mass-energy conversion that occurred when Black Science Man was annihilated by this tweet, our energy problems would be solved.
ASTRONOMICLY WE ARE LESS THAN A GRAIN OF SAND
AAAAA I'M GOING INSANE
>godless universe
Proof?
lack of evidence
There is a mountain of evidence, atheists just have various copes to handwave them away as illusions
The universe is the evidence
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Checkmate, atheist shitter.
A GRAIN OF SAND AT ARMS LENGTH
A GRAIN OF SAND AT ARMS LENGTH
A GRAIN OF SAND AT ARMS LENGTH
A GRAIN OF SAND AT ARMS LENGTH
A GRAIN OF SAND AT ARMS LENGTH
that picture looks worse than space believer amateur cgi
So this is uh touched up right? It doesn't look that beautiful, right?
It's photoshopped from some country (I forget which, Argentina maybe)? What's scary is that NASA passed it off as real.
>So this is uh touched up right?
Yes the colors are fake since the images are taken in the infrared by the telescope.
>It's photoshopped from some country (I forget >What's scary is that NASA passed it off as real.
Take your meds. How can anyone believe such bullshit and function in their everyday life ?
>oy vey shut it down
NASA is a billion-dollar corporation. Whether or not this pic is fake or real is irrelevant, you should always be questioning these massive entities.
>it's shopped because it has to be
so you admit that NASA doctors pictures for the public
you literally couldn't see anything if it weren't.
>you literally couldn't see anything if we didn't have photoshopped pictures
woah... keep digging that hole troon
the pictures are taken in infrared which human eyes can't see without alteration.
Lol “trust us , it’s there”
do you not believe atoms exist?
This is Cinemaphile anon barely any of us can function in a normal social environment
It is a large amount of photos edited together, taken on top of a sky tracker tripod mount (to counteract the rotation of the earth), with a special camera lens that lets in more color and dissipates heat, and finally long exposures of multiple minutes + to capture more light (tripod prevents star trails in this regard). It can't be seen with the naked eye like this, but the image is still harvested using light travel.
I know this is the moronic atheist vs larping christian thread but can we just discuss space horror movies
WHERE IS THE DELTED FOOTAGE FROM EVENT HORIZON?
>godless universe
yes goyim space is real look at our pretty photoshopped pictures
le space is le big and you are le insignificant hehehe
humans cant exist in space and have never been outside the atmosphere. even the 'international SPACE station' is literlaly inside the atmosphere. not even close to the outer edge and inside thermosphere. these billionaire flights to 'space' didnt even come close to the ISS and were also inside the atmosphere by every conceivable definition.
Even the Moon is technically enveloped in Earth's atmosphere.
wtf is wrong with you it's not about the atmosphere it's just because of the radiation belt, outside of that place the solar system is fairly survivable (supposedly), it's just that we have no business sending people nowhere
I want to fight that guy. Like in a parking lot.
Be honest how many of you made this into your Desktop Background ?
the first JWST image with the gravitational lensing is mine
got a pic of comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko
>thing big.........therefore thing scary
gigasoy
This, also gigasoy is the "this make me feel so insignificant, we're just a speck" meme
>amorphous gaseous blob
>hey guys it's 500 million light years wide trust us
>it's not fake haha lol, as if
True and based.
Not space but cosmic horror for sure: episode 2 of Chernobyl
I can't wait for Three Body Problem.
>made by the people who fumbled the biggest show ever and have been doing nothing since
Yeah I’m very excited too anon. Can’t wait to check it out on Netflix
Never saw that show, so I have no experience with them. The source material is there, so unlike season 8 of GoT, it should be good.
Just because you have no experience with something negative, doesn't mean it isn't negative. You haven't been attacked by a hippopotamus, but you probably wouldn't want to get attacked by a hippopotamus.
>GoT was fumbled because they ran out of source material.
> the series I'm looking to should be okay because the source material is complete.
You know nothing
the show or nihilists betraying humanity?
this looks great thx
aniara for sure anon. It doesnt look like much but its what youre looking for
>godless universe
Cringe. Frick off, atheist trannie. Also, everyone please post photos in this thread containing lots of stars (pic related).
This kinda creeps me out. I think clear pictures of the milky way are beautiful and wish I lived somewhere in the country so I could see it more often, but this picture is too much. It's like they're all staring at me.
>It's like they're all staring at me.
w-what if they are??
Frick off, coward.
A true alpha would stare right back, the first to break eye contact isa b***h
A game called "Observation." https://store.steampowered.com/app/906100/Observation/
The beauty of space proves there is a god.
Appeal to incredulity fallacy
Space isn't beautiful those are all drawings by artists
might wanna look at the nigh sky sometimes
you being ugly proves what then
Ugly men end up gettimg older and never move out of their parrnts house. But you already knew that.
>Space
>Beautiful
In a eldritch kind of way that causes you to reflect on your smallness, perhaps. But if there is a god, I would argue it shows that he's not one we actually know or could understand.
Alien/Aliens
>THE UNKNOWN IS… LE BIG AND SCARY
soulless brown citybound cretins, have you no soul of adventure
>he says on website with the same threads posted every day
I've been to space AMA
what do you think about trannies?
Look man, when you're talking about space...*lights a cig*...I mean it's all numbers right? It's a numbers game, I mean let's face it, we're talking about a new age here, this is a new age. Thank you, next question
prove it
You mean movies that capture the wonder of a God filled universe.
which one XD
Annie Hall
*tips fedora*
Fake cgi
A company spends unfathomable ammounts of money, launches a rocket into space and places an artificial satelite on an orbit around l2 that you can spot yourself with a quality enough telescope and then proceedes to create physically and astronomically accurate space images from scratch for... what exactly? Just to frick with people and let the few that see through their lies feel more important?
>proceedes to create physically and astronomically accurate space images
no way to verify if their fantasy images are real
Ok, lets assume they are not real, they still are 100% accurate in terms of physics and astronomy so whats your point
explain what is accurate about the OP pic. what other references do you have to judge its "100% accuracy"?
People a lot smarter than me that have no association to nasa whatsoever looked at these pictures and haven't found a single detail out of place that would contradict the common knowledge. The relations between stars, gas clouds and whatever frickery they also see are explainable with aready existing explanations and calculations. This proves the images are accurate.
they are IR images that got normal color values assigned to different IR values by an alghoritm. No 3d rendering was used so idk where did you get that. Just because data is represented in a way thats easier for us to use its still the same data. The universe looks exactly like that when viewed in IR, apart from the colors. Nothing you said refutes the fact that the images are accurate physically and astronomically.
No they are not, the coloring and 3D rendering is entirely made up. There is no part of the universe that looks even remotely like that.
I believe what Bob Lazar says about the alien ships creating like a bubble around themselves in which they have no mass and kind of skating along as fast as they like on some kind of maglev effect with gravity.
You sound like you have a Phd in quantum physics. There's no way you could be wrong, let's believe together.
Its called Alcubierre drive and
talked about it itt
There is virtually no way to prove this image is legit
>Just trust nasa bro
the new Brian Cox docu-series Universe (2021) has some awesome cg sequences that are actually a bit unsettling, the visuals
and sound/music combined with Cox's perfect narration/cadence
>take picture of air
>assign color so you can see the temperature differences
>ummm akshually there is nothing there, it's all CGI, air literally does not exist
>just trust people bro
Just trust the experts
Don't ask questions
True. The world is flat, frick what the nerds say.
Friendly reminder that the existence of a creator does not make your flavour of man made ~~*religion*~~ true
You'd have to be pretty fricking moronic to not believe the Holy Bible as fact, it covers every single known fact about the Universe and Earth with perfect accuracy.
>god said water will put out fire look what happens when we do it
>"OH MY GOD IT'S ALL REAL BECAUSE WATER PUTS OUT FIRE"
Strawman. Try again.
sub-95 IQ
why are religiousgays on Cinemaphile
Ad hominem, now. I win. Close the tab. You lost. God bless, anon.
>goes along with your logic
>gets mad when he does so
Stop posting any time
>You'd have to be pretty fricking moronic to not believe the Holy Bible as fact
Which Bible? You realise there have been many different version with many different books, right?
Which generation of people got the right version?
Why the frick is every generation short-sighted and egotistical enough to think they're the ones born at just the right time? Every fricking time. Humans are moronic, man.
>you’d have to be pretty moronic not to follow the religion I’m currently following
Gee really?
Ahahaha, they couldn't even get the Roman Emperors of the time correct. The Bible is cobbled-together horseshit mashed together with that homosexual Augustine's headcanon.
event horizon for some 40k kino
Watch a simulation of falling into a black hole. But Reddit moment aside, we are roughly as close to the largest object in the universe in size as the smallest. We have trillions of cells, billions of bacteria, complex brains, etc, we are a hyper complex system more fascinating than any galaxy.
Very cringe when people look to the sky and think we're small. We are like the gods of Olympus, and if there is a God the vast empty beauty of the universe exists for our pleasure alone.
religibros...we lost
everything is meaningless...we are insignificant...aliens aren't real
>le wacky smart man
>only knowledgeable providing the current model is correct
>don't know if it is
its a religion
Let's be objective.
The Holy Bible tells you: how the universe came to be, how the Earth came to be, how Man came to be, how animals came to be, what our purpose is and what goals and pursuits we should strive for.
Science: Has no idea how the universe formed. Has no idea why the Earth has water. Has no idea how life began. Invents invisible matter to fudge all their numbers. Claims aliens exist without proof, but for some reason this is not considered faith. Thinks life has no meaning or purpose but not the conviction to kill themselves, what are they afraid of?
Hmm... real tough choice here.
>bronze age sheperds wrote that god created man from clay
>scientists: hey wait a minute, it looks like it was more complicated than th-
>YOU SCIENTISTS DONT HAVE ALL THE ANSWERS, WHY DONT YOU have a nice day
>all the answers
*any
>muh bible
what makes your fairy tales any more real than all the others? who's to say buddhism or hindusim isn't the truth?
>written by…
>atheist sees something bigger than himself that makes it clear how little his ego matters
>AGGHHHHHH IM GOING INSANE NOOOOOOO THIS IS SCARY
sad
what is with the fedora shilling lately?
Ad hominem attacks, ignore them
Not Cinemaphile but Outer Wilds (The indie game, not the gay Space RPG Obsidian made) is the one media I had where I felt it really captured the horrors of space and how inconsequential you are in it
God tier game if you like space and exploration.
It seemed so simple and childish I gave up and went back to Star Citizen before even leaving the planet. I’ll reinstall and check it out again based off your post.
remote viewing will solve the distance problem
basewd
I can see God right there in your pic.
I can see the Hulk and Abomination
Lynch's Dune movie perfectly encapsulates it. From the desert planets horrifying environment itself to the wildly alien cultures that humans evolved on different planets in isolation. It probably wasn't the intention of the film but it illustrates the very one sided relationship we have with the universe. No matter how hard we wish otherwise, we will change to accommodate its whimsy and there can never be peace because the universe itself isn't peaceful.
God created the universe and the atoms in your body.
Creates*
It's an ongoing process
how do you cope with eternal return? you're just another iteration of yourself in an infinite cycle
I come back stronger every time. Soon my victory shall be complete.
>if only they knew
>Archons
>Holding a candle to a buddha
>your fairy tales
>You'd have to be pretty fricking moronic to not believe the Holy Bible as fact, it covers every single known fact about the Universe and Earth with perfect accuracy.
>people ITT still believe in evolution
holy shit c'mon guys it doesnt even stand up to the smallest of scrutiny