>Many generations after the passing of Caesar, ape societies thrive among the remnants of what was once human civilization. The only humans left are nothing more than rudimentary pests, feral, and rarely seen. Meanwhile, apes are entering their Bronze Age, and difterent ape Cultures are beginning to emerge. While some ape societies have never even heard of Caesar, others have completely perverted his teachings for their own gain. PROXIMUS CAESAR, a powerful Ape leader, is at the verge of a breakthrough for his blossoming kingdom – he has discovered the last vestiges of human technology but its seealed away beneath the earth and will require enlisting many apes to excavate its treasures. Proximus sends a team of marauders, led by SYLVA, on a mission to bring him the ape-power needed to make his dreams a reality. NOA, a youg ape trom the idyllic and peaceful Eagle Clan, watches as his village is destroyed and his people taken by these marauders. Noa embarks on a journey to liberate his people, and along the way teams up with a wise orangutan, RAKA, and a human, who may not be who she seems. While Noa will expand his world-view and embark on self-discovery of his own, he could never predict what this human is capable of, for Mae has a goal of her own stop Proximus at all costs and do whatever it takes to keep the human species going..and plant the seeds for the return of human dominance…
https://fullcirclecinema.com/2022/06/13/planet-of-the-apes-plot-description-teases-ties-matt-reeves-trilogy/
jumping the shark of the planet of the apes
Planet of the Apes as a franchise is literally nothing but a succession of constant shark jumps
The Andy Serkis trilogy is an outlier, literally every other film besides the original is dogshit, and I guess there's about 20 minutes of an interesting film in Beneath. Other than that they all suck
I remember the Tim Burton one being ok, but it has been a while since I watched it
Was the Tim Burton one okay
Or did you just really, really wanna frick Helena Bonham Monke
Tim Roth was fricking scary in that one. Michael Clarke Duncan was based as the gorilla.
Was Shooter a good movie
Tbf Burton one was fun and had some amazing make up, Tim Roth nails it so good its fricking scary, costume desing of the armors is great, but the downsides are Le ebbin time paradox ending, and some of Matt's acting. Feel like the feel got more shit than it deserved because Kevin Smith was still salty at Burton, funny how Kevin now is a basedcuck that keeps crying on twitter because people didnt like his shitty He-Man show while Burton got to frick both Helena and Eva Green
Conquest has some good stuff
The first one is only really good when it’s the only one. I can’t enjoy it knowing that the other movies exist since they all give away the twist just by existing.
THE JUMPING OF THE SHARK OF THE RISING OF THE KINGDOM OF THE LEGEND OF THE PLANET OF THE APES
im gonna need sauce on the image
This comic. J Scott Campbell cover.
thanks anon but before i invest anymore time with it please tell me if there are any ape on human action (by action i mean hard fricking)
>J. Scott Campbell
Knew it, fricking kino.
That bed better be just right.
Please donate, fanx
I liked that he married one of his drawing basically
it was always funny to me how a guy with such an ugly and limited artstyle could have this much of success just because his pictures are sexually charged
BBC
BUILT FOR BAC
Gorillas have famously small penises
Source on that pic?
See
is hack reeves returning
Why do apes have to start back at the bronze age, they are surrounded by the remnants of human civilization everywhere
sounds kinda cool. i'm gonna watch it and cheer for the humans to slaughter as many of those goddamn dirty fricking apes as possible.
>he literally confused the Kate Mara thread with the Planet of the Apes thread
Can't say I blame you
I don't understand why anyone would want to watch a flick about apes ruling over humans. What level of cuckery is that? Same with all the xeno-centric media. Who gets enjoyment out of being defeated? Do people hate their kind that much?
Maybe you're an actual autist. The original had Heston trapped in an insane nightmare scenario - a variant of the protagonist being the only sane man in the room because every other human is an animal and the apes think he's insane/some mutant freak before revealing this is all some dysopian scenario when the bombs go off because it's a Cold War movie. You're the weirdo with a "UGH, is this some cuck shit!?" spin on it
>the original
Black person did you miss the entire franchise spun off that since then that is mostly focused on the apes?
The recent trilogy of movies that focused on the apes as underdogs and discovering a new way of life, not some weird ape dominating humans cuckshit you allude to. The latest one had the apes as the oppressed prisoners of wars of human mercs. Even in the movies where humns are at the mercy of the apes and in movies where humans in general fighting an alien aggressor and on the ropes, it still harkens back to the fact the fact we like underdog stories. What the frick is the alternative? Stories of humans being both the aggressors and protagonists? Humans being the aggressors but the underdogs non-humans are the protagonists? What the frick is the point of that, you stupid homosexual? You tried to come across as le enlightened super smart jaded man with your worthless fricking "insight" but instead exposed yourself as an autistic dipshit.
Because we're in a culture war.
I love all the Planet of the Apes movies but this one is sure to be woke crap.
After seeing Batman I don't expect anything good from Hack Reeves
Kino
I don't like any of the POTA movies besides the 1st original ones because honestly frick apes and the moronic concept that makes it so they end up as the top species on the planet. The new movies just seems like a bunch of humans bad apes good you should be happy that the pure apes are taking over the earth. Frick em.