a lot of those listeneres are LGbatC++ cucks that hear it because gays tell them to support gay artists.
im not saying Queen isnt good, but Beatles is definitely better, by a lot more.
Why is this comparaison even being made? The Beatles and Queen aren’t alike at all. The traditional rivalry was between the Beatles fans and the Rolling Stones fans btw.
the thing with Queen is that they have a ton of great songs but those often make up 2/12 tracks on their actual studio albums (with everything else being completely forgettable filler)
Look at the top music. Queen has a few good ones. Meanwhile all studio albums from the Beatles will triumph any common queen song. You can't compare them. Even Billy Squier has better songwriting than Freddie.
there are so many audio snippets available online that it would be hard too pick particular events but I really dislike how they edited Paul out when George and John were discussing about releasing solo albums and still continuing as a group, George talking about Bonnie & Delaney or even The Band and how they sounded better live because that group worked together, which was cut out from the conversation that he was having with Paul about The White Album. The flowerpot conversation is also not complete, Linda & Yoko are removed etc etc.
Why is Here Comes The Sun their most played song?
its on every spotify playlist ever, was released as b side so not that overplayed plus its a great song
>And it's a shame there's no footage of the time George lost his shit at her.
Now that would've been kino. The part when Yoko sits on George's blue cushion and starts screaming is also so funny
theres this one queen song that i cant find and its driving me crazy, its not like their typical songs and i rember it having a real cool almost zepplin like intro or something but now i cant find it and its driving me nuts
the beatles suck dick its literally like la lalala lala loo lo lady love me forever babyyyy oh tahts a maybe lalallala lo lo lo dont you let me know babe dont let me go for every one of their songs its a bunch of moronic hippie shit now ZEP there is a real band
Paul is undoubtedly talented but he is so soulless its unreal
He made the most moronic decision imaginable in marrying Heather Mills and I say this as someone from the North East of England who knows people who know her.
remember that yoko went to him first and he sent her johns way
[...]
He made the most moronic decision imaginable in marrying Heather Mills and I say this as someone from the North East of England who knows people who know her.
Did anyone get totally burned out by the Beatles? I was a superfan like 10 years ago. finally listened to some Beach Boys, thought I'd give the Beatles a listen again while I was at it. They're good but seem far more edgy/obnoxious than I remembered.
The fact that so many books still name the Beatles as "the greatest or most significant or most influential" rock band ever only tells you how far rock music still is from becoming a serious art. Jazz critics have long recognized that the greatest jazz musicians of all times are Duke Ellington and John Coltrane, who were not the most famous or richest or best sellers of their times, let alone of all times. Classical critics rank the highly controversial Beethoven over classical musicians who were highly popular in courts around Europe. Rock critics, instead, are still blinded by commercial success. The Beatles sold more than anyone else (not true, by the way), therefore they must have been the greatest. Jazz critics grow up listening to a lot of jazz music of the past, classical critics grow up listening to a lot of classical music of the past. Rock critics are often totally ignorant of the rock music of the past, they barely know the best sellers. In a sense, the Beatles are emblematic of the status of rock criticism as a whole: too much attention paid to commercial phenomena and too little to the merits of real musicians. If somebody composes the most divine music but no major label picks him up and sells him around the world, most rock critics will ignore him. If a major label picks up a musician who is as stereotyped as can be but launches her or him worldwide, your average critic will waste rivers of ink on her or him. This is the sad status of rock criticism: rock critics are basically publicists working for major labels, distributors and record stores. They simply highlight what product the music business wants to make money from. Hopefully, one not-too-distant day, there will be a clear demarcation between a great musician like Tim Buckley, who never sold much, and commercial products like the Beatles.
>"movie"
it's a flick about a boyband anon. queen is much better anyway
this is the single gayest post on Cinemaphile right now
I find that hard to believe
right nobody cares about beatles outside of US/UK
>outside of US/UK
lol who gives a shit
those two countries btw are literally where 99% of all the music worth mentioning is made
>zoomers are homosexuals aswell
shocking
holy frick this thread
well im saying it in terms of popularity
queen is more well known at the current year
Queen suck. The original reddit band for proto-redditors.
then go to the thread about the brian singer queen movie
>its more popular on spotify so its better
i think queen has surpassed the beatles
talk to any zoomer and they do not care about the beatles
the lead singer literally died from being gay
imagine being this massive of a homosexual
a lot of those listeneres are LGbatC++ cucks that hear it because gays tell them to support gay artists.
im not saying Queen isnt good, but Beatles is definitely better, by a lot more.
nice bait
>queen
more like queer
you joke, but probably there is some truth on it about how the name was picked.
you know spotify only accounts for plays on spotify right?
Why is this comparaison even being made? The Beatles and Queen aren’t alike at all. The traditional rivalry was between the Beatles fans and the Rolling Stones fans btw.
stones were less talented but made more interesting music
other than drumming, watts was a better drummer
Brain Jones > Every Beatle
who?
>other than drumming, watts was a better drummer
Don’t get me wrong, I think the Stones suck dick. I was just pointing out that the Queen comparaison makes no sense, temporally or stylistically.
The Stones are just rich kiddies pretending to be tough
what is it about drugs that give you that haggard weirdo look?
Cardi B has more plays than Queen
What's your point
Taytay>>>both
Spotify is for gays confirmed
Why is Here Comes The Sun their most played song?
This is reddit, this is memes
the thing with Queen is that they have a ton of great songs but those often make up 2/12 tracks on their actual studio albums (with everything else being completely forgettable filler)
Both of them are overrated shit.
We got a real refined adult here.
Look at the top music. Queen has a few good ones. Meanwhile all studio albums from the Beatles will triumph any common queen song. You can't compare them. Even Billy Squier has better songwriting than Freddie.
>paying for music
Beatles catalog wasn’t in spotify until relatively recently. Queen had years head start.
it's monthly listeners not total
based
>hackson cuts out everything and makes paul look better
Get Back (2021) and its consequences have a been a disaster for the human race
What did he cut out which shouldn't have, in your opinion?
there are so many audio snippets available online that it would be hard too pick particular events but I really dislike how they edited Paul out when George and John were discussing about releasing solo albums and still continuing as a group, George talking about Bonnie & Delaney or even The Band and how they sounded better live because that group worked together, which was cut out from the conversation that he was having with Paul about The White Album. The flowerpot conversation is also not complete, Linda & Yoko are removed etc etc.
its on every spotify playlist ever, was released as b side so not that overplayed plus its a great song
If anything he cut out a shitton to make Yoko look good. The whole movie has basically whitewashed fricking Yoko Ono.
It's weird how they left in references to Yoko doing something that pissed everyone off but didn't include what actually happened.
And it's a shame there's no footage of the time George lost his shit at her.
>And it's a shame there's no footage of the time George lost his shit at her.
Now that would've been kino. The part when Yoko sits on George's blue cushion and starts screaming is also so funny
theres this one queen song that i cant find and its driving me crazy, its not like their typical songs and i rember it having a real cool almost zepplin like intro or something but now i cant find it and its driving me nuts
prophets song, found it
the beatles suck dick its literally like la lalala lala loo lo lady love me forever babyyyy oh tahts a maybe lalallala lo lo lo dont you let me know babe dont let me go for every one of their songs its a bunch of moronic hippie shit now ZEP there is a real band
If Zep were born 30 years later they would have been singing about Harry Potter
kek
This. They sing about Gollum and LotR. They would have been all over HP. Or make songs about Berserk, probably.
you don't know what you're talking about
what's your favorite zeppelin song?
You sound like a homosexual high schooler. Both bands have good songs.
is pauls latest gimmick kino or just dishonesty?
Paul is undoubtedly talented but he is so soulless its unreal
He made the most moronic decision imaginable in marrying Heather Mills and I say this as someone from the North East of England who knows people who know her.
Paul has a terrible track record with women, and people would be more aware of it if Yoko hadn’t existed to take the bad wife heat off him.
remember that yoko went to him first and he sent her johns way
got any hot goss for us?
>remember that yoko went to him first and he sent her johns way
Yeah. What a great friend.
its because he had the tiniest dick in the band, like its microscopic lmao
I don't know, Linda and him were sweet
Did anyone get totally burned out by the Beatles? I was a superfan like 10 years ago. finally listened to some Beach Boys, thought I'd give the Beatles a listen again while I was at it. They're good but seem far more edgy/obnoxious than I remembered.
Honestly, Brian Wilson shits on The Beatles hard. Listen to the incomplete Smiles Sessions to see the grand ideas that blow out Sgt Peppers.
>Beatles
Overrated.
Pic related is everything the Beatles wished they could have been.
this but unironically
its the other way around
he literally built his career of making beatles fanfic music its great and amazing, but thats what it is
The fact that so many books still name the Beatles as "the greatest or most significant or most influential" rock band ever only tells you how far rock music still is from becoming a serious art. Jazz critics have long recognized that the greatest jazz musicians of all times are Duke Ellington and John Coltrane, who were not the most famous or richest or best sellers of their times, let alone of all times. Classical critics rank the highly controversial Beethoven over classical musicians who were highly popular in courts around Europe. Rock critics, instead, are still blinded by commercial success. The Beatles sold more than anyone else (not true, by the way), therefore they must have been the greatest. Jazz critics grow up listening to a lot of jazz music of the past, classical critics grow up listening to a lot of classical music of the past. Rock critics are often totally ignorant of the rock music of the past, they barely know the best sellers. In a sense, the Beatles are emblematic of the status of rock criticism as a whole: too much attention paid to commercial phenomena and too little to the merits of real musicians. If somebody composes the most divine music but no major label picks him up and sells him around the world, most rock critics will ignore him. If a major label picks up a musician who is as stereotyped as can be but launches her or him worldwide, your average critic will waste rivers of ink on her or him. This is the sad status of rock criticism: rock critics are basically publicists working for major labels, distributors and record stores. They simply highlight what product the music business wants to make money from. Hopefully, one not-too-distant day, there will be a clear demarcation between a great musician like Tim Buckley, who never sold much, and commercial products like the Beatles.
When will they get a biopic?
For every good single, they made a shit ton of garbage music
>For every good single, they made a shit ton of garbage music
I mean, has there ever been a band that was consistently good?
dont you think theres enough gay movies?