It was though. It's a reference to Macbeth. Macbeth believes that he can't be killed by anyone born of a woman, only to be killed by a man born of a C-section.
Absolutely not. It was a narrative device to further hammer in the idea that evil will falter due to its own hubris, not some silly attempt to push an out of place, unrelated, political point.
She married and become cute feminine women in the end, so it's not woke.
She thought Men were 100% going to lose and she was going to die anyway, so she wanted to die with a sword in her hand rather than spread her legs for the orcs when they come-a-rapin' in the aftermath. Once she didn't think it was hopeless anymore she reverted to based tradfu.
She was basically the opposite of a modern woman, who will say that she wants to fight the orcs until the opportunity presents itself, at which point she will run away, then spread her legs for the orcs afterwards.
Literally, just imagine what a modern woman would do and it's the opposite of what Eowyn did.
You're right. The reason it wasn't woke is because the character earned that moment through bravery.
What leftist fricktards don't realize is criticism of Mary Sue writing isn't just misogyny. What truly gets under people's skin is female characters accomplishing things they havent suffered to achieve or demonstrated gradual effort towards before achieving.
Correct. It is woke.
So many people don't know what woke is.
I had morons on Reddit try and tell me that the Witcher novels were woke lol, only one guy in the comments knew what he was talking about and agreed with me.
The books paint the situation a little different, it all comes from a premonition from Glorfindel, not that the Witch-King is impervious to damage from creatures with XY chromosomes. He basically tells a dude "leave him be, you aren't the one who is going to kill him, that person will be a woman in the future"
Also Merry literally stabs him in the knee with a blade precisely forged to damage the Witch-King seconds before Eowyn delivers the final blow
That's nothing compared to the overuse of the army of the dead, they were supposed to just take the ships off the corsairs and be released by Aragorn, not fight in the big battle against the elaphants.
if it was woke, she would have headbutted the witch king after an incompetent man tried to intervene before being one shotted by the witch king. The witch king then cowardly calls the king's guard to protect him where Eyowyn takes down all 6 of them by herself. King tries to escape but Eyowyn channels the power of love into her sword in the form of a lightning bolt and is cat walking away with her back turned as it strikes
>Females are inherently political and woke.
This is why you will never get laid, lil chud. I know you'll just handwave this and maybe post an epic meme but 30 years from now you'll think back to this and say "he was right, I should have listened."
This isn't woke, you insufferable moron.
wasn't in the books
woke trash. always was. always will be.
christopher tolkien was right.
I repeat myself, you insufferable moron.
It was though. It's a reference to Macbeth. Macbeth believes that he can't be killed by anyone born of a woman, only to be killed by a man born of a C-section.
way to put that little shit in his place
It was in the books. And Tolkien didn't put it in for wokeness, he did it for love of autistic prophecies.
It was, a hobbit and a women kill him.
What an absolutely fricking pathetic false flag.
have a nice day and boost that 50% just a little bit higher
cope incel
It was. I can forgive PJ because its a relatively minor part of the movies, but he knew he had to pay the woke tax even back then.
Absolutely not. It was a narrative device to further hammer in the idea that evil will falter due to its own hubris, not some silly attempt to push an out of place, unrelated, political point.
It is poltard, cope
Nope.
>This isn't woke
It is. Just because you liked it doesn't make it non-woke.
Your shallow view of wokism undoes you.
How about this?
this would be the subject of a thousand bait Cinemaphile threads if PJ included this entire dialogue
Reminder that later on Eowyn admits that this was basically a depressive episode and renounces to all those warrior lady ideas.
She thought Men were 100% going to lose and she was going to die anyway, so she wanted to die with a sword in her hand rather than spread her legs for the orcs when they come-a-rapin' in the aftermath. Once she didn't think it was hopeless anymore she reverted to based tradfu.
She was basically the opposite of a modern woman, who will say that she wants to fight the orcs until the opportunity presents itself, at which point she will run away, then spread her legs for the orcs afterwards.
Literally, just imagine what a modern woman would do and it's the opposite of what Eowyn did.
if this exact same scene came out today literally everyone on this board would be sperging out about how woke it is don't even pretend otherwise
You're right. The reason it wasn't woke is because the character earned that moment through bravery.
What leftist fricktards don't realize is criticism of Mary Sue writing isn't just misogyny. What truly gets under people's skin is female characters accomplishing things they havent suffered to achieve or demonstrated gradual effort towards before achieving.
Correct. It is woke.
So many people don't know what woke is.
I had morons on Reddit try and tell me that the Witcher novels were woke lol, only one guy in the comments knew what he was talking about and agreed with me.
>attractive white woman who struggles and barely succeeds at a task
>woke
Pick one.
>attractive
The books paint the situation a little different, it all comes from a premonition from Glorfindel, not that the Witch-King is impervious to damage from creatures with XY chromosomes. He basically tells a dude "leave him be, you aren't the one who is going to kill him, that person will be a woman in the future"
Also Merry literally stabs him in the knee with a blade precisely forged to damage the Witch-King seconds before Eowyn delivers the final blow
thats literally what happened in the movie. He stabbed him with a elven dagger and she finished him in the head.
The scene in Two Towers Extended edition where she sings was cringe lol
That's nothing compared to the overuse of the army of the dead, they were supposed to just take the ships off the corsairs and be released by Aragorn, not fight in the big battle against the elaphants.
Uhhh....chudbros....?
We read the books...r-right..?
one scene. not the whole fricking franchise.
Not one person understands what ‘woke’ even means. They just apply it to any old shit
if it was woke, she would have headbutted the witch king after an incompetent man tried to intervene before being one shotted by the witch king. The witch king then cowardly calls the king's guard to protect him where Eyowyn takes down all 6 of them by herself. King tries to escape but Eyowyn channels the power of love into her sword in the form of a lightning bolt and is cat walking away with her back turned as it strikes
>This isn't woke, you insufferable moron.
I'm not watching your moronic TV series, Amazon.
She married and become cute feminine women in the end, so it's not woke.
>gets married by choice
>"heh, not so woke now"
what
women belong in the kitchen
Everything to do with Rohan and Minas Tirith was boring / shit / irrelevant. Fellowship was great, then the only good stuff is Frodo & Gollum.
The best bait post I've seen in weeks, Bravo anon
>Females are inherently political and woke.
This is why you will never get laid, lil chud. I know you'll just handwave this and maybe post an epic meme but 30 years from now you'll think back to this and say "he was right, I should have listened."
>In 30 years you'll remember this reply to your bait post
The saddest cope
>but 30 years from now you'll think back to this and say "he was right, I should have listened.
Holy projection, Batman