>I loved buzz light year star command, too bad Cinemaphile calls it pozzed if it came out today cause it has black people
if they are charismatic black people then nobody would give a frick
Actually quite surprising to me, I was expecting a billion dollars from this. Maybe if Disney had released this in August at a time with less competition it would've made the big bucks.
>force lesbians in a kids film >why is it flopping
The female lead is shown briefly visiting her wife and baby, because it's not just that everybody wanted to see lesbians, everybody wanted to see hideous monkey-ass Black person lesbians
Married Black person women who kiss and shit.
homosexuals are going to learn one way or another that they are neither welcome nor accepted.
They've been sliding by being tolerated, but that's wearing thin fast.
Thanks anons. Dang, I had at least a little hope for it because the redesigned Zurg and robots looked promising.
Disney's utterly and comprehensively fricked until further notice and/or collapse.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Trips don't lie.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Disney's utterly and comprehensively fricked until further notice and/or collapse.
Holy shit it's happening.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Disney's utterly and comprehensively fricked until further notice and/or collapse.
THE ENEMY IS STAGGERED
2 years ago
Anonymous
The only recent thing I liked from Disney was Luca last year, and before that it was Wreck it Ralph back in 2012. I think Luca was an accidentally good movie because I barely remember it being advertised like they wanted it to fail. I just don't understand.
Married Black person women who kiss and shit.
homosexuals are going to learn one way or another that they are neither welcome nor accepted.
They've been sliding by being tolerated, but that's wearing thin fast.
many token blacks from the '90s and '00s would be considered anti-white aggression now because the position of whites has gotten so much more precarious. Almost all whites in the '90s and '00s were ignorant enough to believe their status was not being rapidly eroded towards marginalization and so thought they could afford to be magnanimous.
Actually quite surprising to me, I was expecting a billion dollars from this. Maybe if Disney had released this in August at a time with less competition it would've made the big bucks.
Entertainment should relegate homo’s to musicals and low budget shit-tier comedies that only air on gay only tv channels. Gays don’t care about Buzz Lightyear. They only care about fricking kids and you don’t necessarily need a movie to accomplish that.
It was the perfect storm of factors >Pixar's reputation has been slipping for years >Didn't even ask Tim Allen to voice Buzz, negative PR right out the gate >Movie's trailers just look uninspired and boring >Seems almost intentionally not targeted at children who might actually want to see a Buzz Lightyear movie >Attempting to play the gay rep card right in the middle of LGBT grooming becoming a growing controversy with families >Releasing right alongside a runaway success unwoke summer blockbuster sensation
Not to mention that wokies hated this movie from the first screen shot because >he looks like a cop who finds excuses to pull over minorities
AKA he's a clean cut white man
Didn't Sing 2 and The Bad Guys do decently? Sonic did well. We shall see how Minions 2 performs considering that franchise overstayed it's welcome years ago and Despicable Me 3 didn't do that well either.
Good kids movies are still coming through, they're just surrounded by weird stuff like Lightyear that has no idea who the audience is.
Look at, say, Paddington 2. Endearing kids film with a layer of thing aimed at the adults that are stuck in the theatre with them. Smart. That's how you do a kids film. The Muppets (2011) is another good example.
I don't really watch many kids films but all you really have to do is ask - Who is this movie for? Who's the target audience here. Because for a good kids movie, it needs to be kids AND parents. Lightyear seems to be... neither.
I was forced to go to the movies to watch the new Jurassic park movie in "4d", all it was is water being sprayed at you as you were thrown about in your seat.
My niece loved it and was giggling the entire time. The movie itself was genuinely nothing, it was just stuff happening and no one was talking about the movie itself after everyone was talking about being thrown around and water being sprayed on them.
I don't want to see either but if someone said we have to see one of these movies tonight it would be Jurassic Park. At least I can see some people get eaten by dinosaurs.
>I...it was supposed to flop!
What kind of cope is this? Pixar films would regularly make a billion dollars. Toy Story is their biggest franchise. Maybe they didn't think this would be huge but I'm sure they aren't happy having a smaller opening than fricking Morbius
pretty much all films are way more leftist/"woke" than they were 10 years ago but they're still doing well.
"go woke go broke" is cope from centrists/conservatives who are powerless against US institutions that are legally required to go woke:
https://richardhanania.substack.com/p/woke-institutions-is-just-civil-rights
>go woke go broke" is cope from centrists/conservatives who are powerless against US institutions that are legally required to go woke: >Being out preform by the worse Jurassic park movie
/co/umblr Disney damage control struggles with lightyear flopping.
do you not understand that's written by a (almost certain) race realist conservative who is arguing that leftists wrote their anti-white bullshit into law? in other words he agrees with you.
and it's such an insidious thing too because leftists can frame any attempt to change the anti-whiteness as being "against civil rights".
Go woke go broke doesn’t apply to everything all the time but there is definitely a pattern to it. And Disney is spiraling down the drain. > by every measure their streaming service is a flop, terrible, predictable and underwhelming content, Low subscriber base, terrible app > Disney stock is in freefall despite good revenue numbers from their parks, investors are simply losing confidence > they lost their special privileges in Florida > leaked zoom meetings expose them for being child groomers with they’re “not so secret gay agenda“ > they no longer create magical stories because the riders are too focused on making sure to shove the liberal “message” down our throats instead of just giving us a fun story > they were once a company that both liberals and conservatives liked equally but since they entered the culture wars on the liberal side conservatives continue to sour on Disney. Remember that Paul a few months back where Disney had an abysmal approval rating… Something like 78%, or something embarrassing. > so in Disney’s case it does look like go woke go broke does apply. I cancelled Disney+ after Gina Carano got fired and the last two vacations I took were at Universal when we used to go on 2 Disney vacations a year
>leaked zoom meetings expose them for being child groomers
I hadn’t heard this one, what happened? Not that I don’t believe it, it sounds disgustingly on point.
I don't even care about it being woke, it's such a bizarre premise. They made a whole-ass movie that is a movie set inside of another movie? It made sense when Tropic Thunder did it but these dudes aren't being funny, they mean it.
>approachable moron lead who literally fights himself (aka the same shit they did in Wreck It Ralph 2) to learn a valuable lesson about toxic masculinity >woke
yes
In some unrelated news it turns out my fiance has been cheating on me for a very long time but, get this, most likely not by getting fricked by some Chad but rather by literally pissing on dudes who are into that sort of thing. Apparently they drink her piss aswell. It's a pretty surreal feeling tbh. My life is in shambles but it's also just so absurd.
Tzehehe. But really, they sent her messages where they ask her for bottles of her piss, asking her to film herself pissing but claim to enjoy it better straight from the source. What the frick is going on man, I'll fricking drink myself to death now. Have a good time bros
Doesnt seem like it from the messages, appears to be her fetish aswell even though she never indicated such a thing to me. I wouldn't have minded to at least try and have been timid or anything, so dunno what's going on tbh
Having had some experience with this sort of thing in the past, she was probably just deathly afraid and embarrassed about the idea of bringing it up to you and stuck to using strangers as an outlet for the peepee fetish. I can understand being mad, though personally I'd probably let it slide based on what you've said so far. Which again, is assuming she didn't actually have sex with anyone else.
I know it doesn’t feel this way, and it won’t for a long time, but it’s a good thing you found out and found out now before marriage and kids.
Pick yourself up, dust yourself off and move on. Cut all contact, delete any way to contact her and proceed as if she is dead to the world and you.
Firing Tim Allen was ultimate israelitery. Yet Tom Hanks can still dress up as Woody and sneak into children's bedrooms while their Greek parents sleep.
No idea who this is marketed towards.
The audience who would even presumably get hyped about "LIGHTYEAR" is the original Toy Story audience. They have completely moved on from the franchise after Toy Story 3 which had, fittingly, letting go of the past and growing up as major themes.
I can say with confidence that this particular group of people is also the last group that would be interested in pozzed wokeshit, having seen these concepts turn from a joke culture contained to tumblr to making its way into the government water supply.
Nobody else gives a shit besides funko-pop collecting manchildren and viral marketers pretending to be consumers.
I would say "Make mediocre movie, don't get much return". That kiss scene was another of those blink and you'll miss it thing that it could easily be cut out and it wouldn't change much, just like many Disney owned properties.
It just looks boring. All disney expanded universe shit is so soulless and mass produced. >come watch another lonely space man movie but with all the psychological edges sanded down to a 4th grade level.
literally all they had to do was make a decent movie length story with a cast like this, Buzz Lightyear's real VA, a bit of 90s x-treme awesome, and it would have done amazingly well
that's all they had to do
It's more that nobody care. Ffs nobody cared about Toy Story after the 2nd movie.
And since it's movie inside the movie it doesn't have any impact on the other movie. It's the best way to make sure that the last people who cared don't give a frick.
This has been Disney's strat since they bought Pixar, not just to crush them, but to humiliate them. They've taken the best talent and shifted them to Disney projects. Those that remain at Pixar are either stupid, or work for stupid execs. Once Pixar has enough flops, Disney can shut them down without too much backlash.
are animated movies as big as they used to be? it seems that disney has been going in with "live action remakes" of movies that would have been better off being completely animated.
Has nothing to do with "wokenss." I saw it this morning with my nephew. It's a shitty, boring, cliched film. My nephew is 7 and loves Toy Story and even he was bored.
It is shitty boring and cliché because it is made by woke people. Woke cultists are incapable of making good original art, they can only take older ideas and redo them with Gays and non-Whites.
No, that's not why. It's partly because this is a side story (or in-universe story or whatever) of a character that has already been featured in 4 full movies, TV series', etc. The character was once charming, but this movie lacks that charm. It's poorly written. The woke shit is barely noticeable since nothing in the movie registers.
And plenty of gay, minority, etc., artists are making good films. Don't paint with such a broad brush.
>Turning what should have been a bright and fun swashbuckling adventure against aliens and evil emperors into a dour lifeless existential crisis
Pixar just have their head up their asses because they believe their own hype as the "Deep" animation studio
Something something bo peep something something Woody wants to seperate from the toys something something
Pretty much had no real reason to be made other than money
The homosexual Spork isn't a toy so I didn't want to see that shit. Bo Peep goes from a fragile glass figure revered for her beauty to some action girl nonsense bullshit. I had zero interest in giving that a watch. Where being a woman is automatically better than anything a man is or can produce. Because it usually comes at the expense of the man's intensity, integrity and intelligence or all three.
>>"woke" has now lost all meaning to zoomers that it just means anytime there is a black person in a thing
blame corporations, now even if that's not their intentions everything with a black person in it is going to be consider "woke" it is your fault, homosexual
>>"woke" has now lost all meaning to zoomers that it just means anytime there is a black person in a thing
It's pretty easy to tell when the black person is there because of a creative spark from an artist or because it's the proper casting for the character. It's easy to tell when the casting is due to big corpo guidelines and diversity & inclusion initiatives for the purpose of propaganda.
Please explain, in your own moronic logic, what seeing a fiction black person DOES in an effort to (something something) with propaganda? I'm sure it will be a very well-reasoned answer!
The Church of Diversity is one of today's secular religions. See
Reminder that this woman has been promoted recently.
>what seeing a fiction black person DOES in an effort to (something something) with propaganda?
If it does nothing then why does Amazon have diversity & inclusion guidelines passed down from big corpo to the creatives in productions? It is of course propaganda. It's meant to present a specific image with a political agenda in mind. An anti-White political agenda. This diversity & inclusion did not come out of thin air. It was devised in university departments were virulently and explicitly anti-White ideology is taught.
It's all so smug white liberals, especially rich ones in charge of media, can nod smugly to each other about how Progressive and Diverse they're making the world. It is obvious to everyone, and everyone who is not a smug white liberal is sick of it.
>moronic ESL Muslim mad at gays in cartoons doesn't understand English
>furious Bangladeshi mad that he got exposed
Learn English, Ranjeep
2 years ago
Anonymous
>It's all so smug white liberals, especially rich ones in charge of media, can nod smugly to each other about how Progressive and Diverse they're making the world. It is obvious to everyone, and everyone who is not a smug white liberal is sick of it.
And who gives enough of a shit that this is happening? It does nothing to your life, you can in fact just simply ignore it, you understand this right?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>just ignore it
Laughing at its absolute collapse is more fun
Good Dinosaur ended up putting Disney in the hole -$85 million, this movie is doing similar business but had an even bigger budget
2 years ago
Anonymous
Lol oh no! 85 million??? How will one of the biggest distribution companies ever recover!
2 years ago
Anonymous
They've lost an entire decade's worth of financial growth within the last nine months lol
2 years ago
Anonymous
No they haven't you moron, you can't read graphs you don't understand.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>we didn't need that $94 billion of market cap
2 years ago
Anonymous
I'm sure Disney will go bankrupt any day now! I'm sure their record profits during the pandemic just were fake meme bucks or something
2 years ago
Anonymous
>this is how we win
2 years ago
Anonymous
Disney owns literally almost all of the highest grossing films of the last 20 years and you think they give a shit that a Pixar movie flopped?
2 years ago
Anonymous
Of course they give a shit. Any loss of profit is bad.
Not saying they're gonna go bankrupt but they obviously do care.
2 years ago
Anonymous
It's not like this flop is an accident. All their animated films flopped hard one after another. This has been going on for years. A film strarring Buzz Lightyear should have been an easy win.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>noooooooo! don't you understand? seeing all the heckin latinx PoCs makes me feel virtuous!
Everyone is sick of it, across all races and identiies except smug white liberals.
>you can in fact just simply ignore it, you understand this right?
Sounds like that's what audiences are doing lmao
2 years ago
Anonymous
You didn't answer my question as to why your own autistic fricking ass refuses to ignore it.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>You didn't answer my question as to why your own autistic fricking ass refuses to ignore it.
Why do it?
2 years ago
Anonymous
Cause its fun to poke fun at shit you funless gay.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Ahmed who can't read English pretending nobody else can write proper English
by Allah, what did he mean by this?
>what seeing a fiction black person DOES in an effort to (something something) with propaganda?
If it does nothing then why does Amazon have diversity & inclusion guidelines passed down from big corpo to the creatives in productions? It is of course propaganda. It's meant to present a specific image with a political agenda in mind. An anti-White political agenda. This diversity & inclusion did not come out of thin air. It was devised in university departments were virulently and explicitly anti-White ideology is taught.
they were buying it before just fine, so no i think is just straight up propaganda and if you're white i hope jamal and pedro rape you and your family
2 years ago
Anonymous
>they were buying it just fine
Except they weren't you drooling moron, you aren't thinking like an out of touch corporation, they don't give a single shit about your personal morals or leprroppaaaagandereaahhh, nobody with power cares about ideology. It's about money and making more money and doing/saying whatever you want to meet those goals. Learn that blackpill and stop posting here.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>It's about money and making more money
then why are they keep losing money and making the same mistakes? damn you're just as stupid as corpos
2 years ago
Anonymous
Because they actually aren't losing the amount of money you think they are in order to make them change their marketing narratives
EVERYTHING NEEDS TO BE ABOUT SAME SEX INTERCOURSE
THINK ABOUT SAME SEX INTERCOURSE
MAKE SURE YOUR CHILDREN ARE AWARE AND OFTEN THINKING ABOUT SAME SEX INTERCOURSE
>Disney tells Pixar to cut all the gay shit from their films >Pixar goes to press and publicly shits on Disney for this >Disney relents >entire conversation around the film revolves around the gay black characters >the whole "Disney is grooming children" thing happens
Who could have foreseen this movie flopping with families?
Is this board just gonna like or hate a movie because of their politic mindsets.
What happened to judging based on the the quality of the movie.
Of course you can criticize the messages of the film, but it's not the entire piece.
What about the characters, story, pacing, editing, soundtrack, acting and so on.
I'm not interested on this film, but come on.
Here is the thing.
Leftists have been lobbying for years about how evil and toxic white men are, how everything they represent and like is bad and wrong and must be erased and ridiculed in media so leftists started this whole culture war thing when people only wanted to watch some movie and relax.
Ever wonder why black people, strong woman were cool to watch in movies and everyone was ok with them back in the 90s?
Because there wasn't this divisiveness culture war bullshit. People were allowed to enjoy things without being preached on about how evil they and their culture are.
An attempt to brainwash the next generation.
Of course they fail to understand that if nobody's watching their propaganda, then the propaganda won't work.
Calling pixar fricking baby movies propaganda is going to make you embarrassed when your balls drop, you do know that right? Like, in some level you must know you're going to memory hole your stupid behavior in less than 5 years, right?
It's not bait you moron, "everything I don't like is le propeegander" is baby's first edgy post.
2 years ago
Anonymous
You're mad. Try making and supporting a good movie next time, israelite.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>literally crying about Disney baby films = not mad >people making fun of me for being an easily emotionally manipulated moron =mad
really makes you think
2 years ago
Anonymous
>oy vey!
it is mildly hilarious to see you would-be Marcuses try to dictate to people what they want, and what they want their kids to see, and then cry when nobody pays to see it
2 years ago
Anonymous
Nobody but you are crying, you made an entire fricking thread about it. You just pretend to have such a lack of self-awareness, right comrade?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>laughing at a flop that seemed almost deliberately engineered to fail at every stage of the creative process >crying
kekw
2 years ago
Anonymous
>laughing
yeah bro, you totally aren't having a b***hfit again about minorities in movies for the umpteenth time!
2 years ago
Anonymous
>y-you're not laughing at this shitty movie failing! >you're angry, somehow, because this thing that you wanted to happen is happening!
kek indeed, it is clearly me who is furious here
2 years ago
Anonymous
un-angry people don't make ten threads an hour about a gay cartoon character, anon. Nobody ever believes the "I'm just laughing" cope.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>dabbing on my side's failure just proves you're mad
Lightyear flopped lol
2 years ago
Anonymous
>my side
your brain is melted by politics, it's a fricking cartoon movie for children. We don't have a "side" in this argument you dumb fricking cretin.
2 years ago
Anonymous
your gay movie flopped and you are seething that Disney lost millions of dollars making this shit lol
2 years ago
Anonymous
>ten seconds of a cartoon gay kissing >"gay movie"
One day you'll have to realize how insane you sound.
2 years ago
Anonymous
that's how it always starts >it's only ten seconds! >it's only a minute! >it's only an hour! >it's only a franchise!
2 years ago
Anonymous
Oh no, there would be a franchise full of g-g-gays??? It's not like I can close my fricking eyes or something! That will literally ruin my life!
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Oh no, there would be a franchise full of g-g-gays??? It's not like I can close my fricking eyes or something! That will literally ruin my life!
lol doesn't look like there will be, given how much money they're losing on this one
nobody wants your deviant bullshit around kids
2 years ago
Anonymous
How what always starts? Gay people aren't allowed to have franchises?
2 years ago
Anonymous
No
2 years ago
Anonymous
If you can't reproduce you don't deserve a franchise, also stop having AIDs first.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>in the entire history of the AIDS epidemic, more straight people died from it
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Who was Dugas?
Your "people" proliferated this disease with your butt-fricking practices of sodomy, thanks to wild gay homosexuals like Dugas sex was ruined like his butthole after being penetrated more than 200 times a year.
2 years ago
Anonymous
I'm not gay, schizo. Just explaining to you that the majority of causalities to the AIDS outbreaks have been straight people. That is literally a fact.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Frick: casualties
2 years ago
Anonymous
>in the entire history of the AIDS epidemic, more straight people died from it
The CDC disagrees
https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/statistics/overview/ataglance.html
2 years ago
Anonymous
>HIV in 2019 is the same outbreak as the global fricking AIDS epidemic of the late 70s and 80s
anon...
2 years ago
Anonymous
Okay, give me your "more straight people get AIDS than gays" links or citations then
2 years ago
Anonymous
I'm not fricking spoon-feeding you, zoomie who lives at a Baptist boarding house. AIDS ravaged third world countries for over a decade, are you so stunted intellectually that you think the literal millions who died from it all over the world were just fricking asses?
2 years ago
Anonymous
I gave you my source proving the overwhelming majority of HIV cases are in fact due to homosexual men. You responded by throwing a fit and calling names. You lose, dude, because you made up your source.
2 years ago
Anonymous
The status of your anus is not for me to know, AIDs epidemic was caused by gay people, that is too a fact. It was and it is a fetish these sodomites have, in their uncontrollable perversion they seek to spread and receive this shit like a self-destructive cult, all of this pride movement is just a insult to normal people who see them is disdain.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>AIDs epidemic was caused by gay people, that is too a fact
No it wasn't you underage, it was caused from diseases being transferred from animals being eaten.
2 years ago
Anonymous
see
[...]
The CDC disagrees
https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/statistics/overview/ataglance.html
2 years ago
Anonymous
I gave you my source proving the overwhelming majority of HIV cases are in fact due to homosexual men. You responded by throwing a fit and calling names. You lose, dude, because you made up your source.
Spoon-feeding: >Sub-Saharan Africa is the region most affected by HIV. In 2018, an estimated 61% of new HIV infections occurred in this region,[11] and as of 2020, more than two thirds of those living with HIV are living in Africa.[3] HIV rates have been decreasing in the region: From 2010 to 2020, new infections in eastern and southern Africa fell by 38%.[9] Still, South Africa has the largest population of people with HIV of any country in the world, at 7.06 million,[12] 19.1%[13] of the population as of 2020
2 years ago
Anonymous
>en.m.wikipedia >.m. >disease-spreading homosexual is also a phoneposter
big surprise
>thinks because HIV jumped to humans through a human eating (hopefully) an ape that it wasn't spread by God-cursed homosexuals fricking each other in the ass
kek do you think the massive overrepresenation of HIV infection in gay men, from literally the beginning to today, is because gay mean eat a lot of ape meat?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>it was a magical curse against gays, praise Allah!
It has statistically been that Sub Saharan Africans have overrepresented the percentage of deaths in the entire fricking world statistic you knuckle dragging simpleton.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>It has statistically been that Sub Saharan Africans have overrepresented the percentage of deaths in the entire fricking world statistic you knuckle dragging simpleton.
>see, gays in New York dropping like flies throughout the 80s and 90s is because sub-Saharan Africans hunt and eat chimps! >why even use condoms at all?
lmao no wonder you degenerates are festering with disease
2 years ago
Anonymous
I'm saying that on a global statistic, for a worldwide fricking epidemic, it wasn't le gays doing the butt sex, that represents the majority of cases and deaths. What about this do you struggle with?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>it wasn't le gays doing the butt sex
It literally was and is. It still is today. It is here, and it is in Africa
...and nobody is actually arguing that, I'm saying that the net total of deaths, we're not homosexuals.
>I'm saying that the net total of deaths, we're not homosexuals. >total >we're
But in fact it is. The #1 risk factor for it, everywhere, for decades, has been engaging in unprotected anal sex.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>my pastor told me that nearly 40 million people died because of gay sex
2 years ago
Anonymous
>36 million deaths were because of gay sex
your brain is broken my dude, it's straight up broken.
Here's some sources about how the HIV epidemic in South Africa overwhelmingly affects homosexual men
...and nobody is actually arguing that, I'm saying that the net total of deaths, we're not homosexuals.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>my pastor told me that nearly 40 million people died because of gay sex
>the majority of US cases are homosexuals >and the majority of South African cases are also homosexuals >this proves it's the hetero's fault
holy frick dude
2 years ago
Anonymous
>>and the majority of South African cases are also homosexuals
they literally aren't.
2 years ago
Anonymous
They literally are. The slight difference is easily attributable to the fact that it's a lot safer to identify as gay here than in Africa, where homosexuality is still a criminal offense in a lot of jurisdictions.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>40 million people are all just gays doing butt sex
2 years ago
Anonymous
To be sure, there's a fair number of drug addicts, rape victims etc in there
And, like I said, a fair amount of black men fricking each other on the DL, getting infected, and then spreading it to unsuspecting black women. And various African traditional cultures holding that sex with a virgin cures anything, and thus you had children getting raped by HIV-infected Africans. But the #1 vector is STILL male-male anal sex.
If you've contracted HIV in the First World there's a better than 7 in 10 chance that you're a gay man, despite gay men making up about 1.5% of the overall population.
>4-44-40 million
That's about right, considering it's been around and killing people for more than 4 decades
2 years ago
Anonymous
AIDS has literally rotted that homosexual's brain
>2% of the population in America is 70% of the infected >and 2% of the population in Africa is 70% of the infected >therefore it's the 98% of the population that makes up 30% of the infected who are at fault
2 years ago
Anonymous
>therefore it's the 98% of the population that makes up 30% of the infected who are at fault
Take away bisexuals and intravenous drug users from that 30% and you'll find that the number of heterosexuals with HIV/AIDS is about 2% to 3% of the total HIV/AIDS population.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Spoon-feeding: >Sub-Saharan Africa is the region most affected by HIV. In 2018, an estimated 61% of new HIV infections occurred in this region,[11] and as of 2020, more than two thirds of those living with HIV are living in Africa.[3] HIV rates have been decreasing in the region: From 2010 to 2020, new infections in eastern and southern Africa fell by 38%.[9] Still, South Africa has the largest population of people with HIV of any country in the world, at 7.06 million,[12] 19.1%[13] of the population as of 2020
Your "sources" don't even mention sexual orientation at all, unlike the ones previously provided that show overwhelming skew towards homosexuality
What the frick kind of argument do you think you're making?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>36 million deaths were because of gay sex
your brain is broken my dude, it's straight up broken.
2 years ago
Anonymous
And yet you still fail to give a single cite that supports your position. Interdasting.... interdasting.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Spoon-feeding: >Sub-Saharan Africa is the region most affected by HIV. In 2018, an estimated 61% of new HIV infections occurred in this region,[11] and as of 2020, more than two thirds of those living with HIV are living in Africa.[3] HIV rates have been decreasing in the region: From 2010 to 2020, new infections in eastern and southern Africa fell by 38%.[9] Still, South Africa has the largest population of people with HIV of any country in the world, at 7.06 million,[12] 19.1%[13] of the population as of 2020
2 years ago
Anonymous
Sub-Saharan total case counts are proof that more heterosexuals are dying from HIV than homos? Is your reading comprehension that bad?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Confusing the crossing of the disease from apes to humans to the HUMAN EPIDEMIC OF AIDS caused by gay people butt-fricking each other into oblivion that spreed this disease across the US and most likely across the world.
Learn how to read.
2 years ago
Anonymous
See
Spoon-feeding: >Sub-Saharan Africa is the region most affected by HIV. In 2018, an estimated 61% of new HIV infections occurred in this region,[11] and as of 2020, more than two thirds of those living with HIV are living in Africa.[3] HIV rates have been decreasing in the region: From 2010 to 2020, new infections in eastern and southern Africa fell by 38%.[9] Still, South Africa has the largest population of people with HIV of any country in the world, at 7.06 million,[12] 19.1%[13] of the population as of 2020
Does Iran even have Cinemaphile where you live?
2 years ago
Anonymous
Do you even know how to read? Are we talking about Africa or the US and its epidemic of AIDs? Which was caused by gay people like Dugas. No one mentions AIDs in Africa in this context because the origin of their epidemic is different, it was not cause by black african gay people, but by people eating infected chimp meat.
In the US however, and some other regions of the globe, the epidemic of AIDs was caused by the lowest cast of people who abused drugs and had unprotected sex like wild animals.
2 years ago
Anonymous
non-brain-addled people when discussing a global epidemic, usually are talking about the entire globe, anon.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Where's your cite? Where's your proof? Should be easy for you to find, unless of course you're talking out your ass...
2 years ago
Anonymous
His delusion is almost awe-inspiring
>sure, 70% of the new cases every year here are gay men, who make up about 2% of the population >but look at how widely it's spread in Africa!!!! >Africa: highest infected populations are gay men
>my pastor told me that nearly 40 million people died because of gay sex
Yes. It's especially tragic when you look at the heterosexual stats for HIV in the USA -- the overwhelming majority of black Americans who contract HIV do so through male-to-male sex, even though more than half of new black male HIV patients identify as heterosexual. Though they're a tiny set compared to homosexuals, something like 80% of black female HIV cases get it through heterosexual sex, meaning down-lo black men are fricking each other and getting HIV, then spreading it to black women.
2 years ago
Anonymous
We are not, or at least we weren't, discussing a global epidemic, we were discussing how gay people caused the 80s epidemic and how gay people are more likely to have AIDs. The whole discussion started with this, the other anon, which I don't if it is you or not, tried to push in Africa into the talk to deflect the blame. I again make the point that, when discussing homosexuality and AIDs, no one mentions Africa's AIDs problem because the origin of their problem doesn't stems out of people having unprotected sex, especially homosexual people.
But when talk about gay people and AIDs, you cannot say that gay people did not played a important role in spreading it across the americas, another reason being the rampant drug use like meth. You cannot say that gay people don't have a fetish centred around having, spreading and receiving this disease, where they seek out strong loads in order to infect the most amount of people. Just see Dugas and his life style, a thousand or more sexual partners whom themselves must have had their own double digits sex partners.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>junkies >people
pick one butthole
2 years ago
Anonymous
Entire African nations are not just comprised of "junkies" moronanon. You realize AIDS was spreading in third worlds because of poor hygiene conditions and not le butt sex disease meme right?
2 years ago
Anonymous
It's the whole western media actually
2 years ago
Anonymous
and yet here you are, absolutely boiling over a shitty movie failing
2 years ago
Anonymous
Is this a GPT bot? The post makes absolutely zero fricking sense in context of the post it's replying to
2 years ago
Anonymous
un-angry people don't make ten threads an hour about a gay cartoon character, anon. Nobody ever believes the "I'm just laughing" cope.
>laughing
yeah bro, you totally aren't having a b***hfit again about minorities in movies for the umpteenth time!
>thread full of people who hated the movie, laughing and celebrating that the movie flopped >"ur just mad that the movie flopped"
2 years ago
Anonymous
No, you are clearly mad that a cartoon lesbian kissed another lesbian and hiding it under the cope of "the movie flopped so that reaffirms my beliefs" meme, when really, it was that the movie was marketed well and had no major interest in a era where people are just passively watching movies and less in theaters and nobody gives a shit about a Buzz Light-year origin story.
2 years ago
Anonymous
*wasn't marketed well
2 years ago
Anonymous
Holy shit dude, you fricking lost the ability to speak English halfway through that sentence. Wanna try again?
2 years ago
Anonymous
That was all grammatically correct English, Ahmed. You want to use Google translate?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>"it was that the movie was marketed well and had no major interest in a era where people are just passively watching movies and less in theaters and nobody gives a shit about a Buzz Light-year origin story" >That was all grammatically correct English
Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
2 years ago
Anonymous
Are...are you actually ESL? You are taking the piss, right?
2 years ago
Anonymous
Anon, if you wrote
No, you are clearly mad that a cartoon lesbian kissed another lesbian and hiding it under the cope of "the movie flopped so that reaffirms my beliefs" meme, when really, it was that the movie was marketed well and had no major interest in a era where people are just passively watching movies and less in theaters and nobody gives a shit about a Buzz Light-year origin story.
you really need to go back to school. This is a grammar trainwreck
2 years ago
Anonymous
>moronic ESL Muslim mad at gays in cartoons doesn't understand English
And this does, what exactly? How is this "propaganda"? Do you /misc/tards even know what the word means?
>the guy frantically defending the gay movie on Cinemaphile is also a blatant newbie
Wow, I'm astonished
2 years ago
Anonymous
>I'm not mad your themad-one, see icant even write right.
2 years ago
Anonymous
The irony.
2 years ago
Anonymous
The autism. Can't find the joke in there?
2 years ago
Anonymous
You /misc/cels literally give this movie the most SEO traction online because nobody fricking cares about this movie.
2 years ago
Anonymous
this might be the only time that i agree with a shazam troony
2 years ago
Anonymous
>un-angry people don't make ten threads an hour about a gay cartoon character, anon.
lmao we sure as frick do, especially when their shitty movie implodes and gentlemen such as yourself are left shrieking in fury
I will continue to laugh at this thing for the next few weeks until it drops out of theaters, and then I will make threads laughing at that
you're welcome to stick around and spew your impotent rage in those threads too kek
2 years ago
Anonymous
Oh I'm a troony too? You sure showed me.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>You sure showed me.
True, I did!
maybe you better go buy a dozen tickets to Lightyear and try to stop the bleeding
2 years ago
Anonymous
>and then I will make threads laughing at that
Do you not have real hobbies?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>s-s-stop
Is this a GPT bot? The post makes absolutely zero fricking sense in context of the post it's replying to
>b-b-b--b-b-bbot
HAHAHAHA THE HELPLESS ANGER
2 years ago
Anonymous
>un-angry people don't make ten threads an hour
You are clearly unfamiliar with the imageboard culture, reddit tourist, if you think thread spams only happen only over bad or unpleasant news, when in reality it's almost always the opposite. Plus you extremely exaggerate this boards attention towards an annual pixar woke flick, probably because you yourself take these discussions very personally and keep projecting yet again
2 years ago
Anonymous
Hello, newfriend.
2 years ago
Anonymous
This "u mad" tangent is mind-boggingly ineffective because the movie has flopped, Disney will lose millions of dollars for their homosexualry this week. Why would anyone be mad? Of course people are flexing and laughing about it.
Shit, the strawmen in your head would be mad if the movie was rocketing towards a billion dollars, but it's not.
It flopped lmao
Nobody is buying tickets to it
Nobody wanted to see it
2 years ago
Anonymous
un-angry people don't make ten threads an hour about a gay cartoon character, anon. Nobody ever believes the "I'm just laughing" cope.
2 years ago
Anonymous
You are the one who's crying here over globohomosexual propaganda rightfully getting flopped and anons just making fun of the fact. Keep projecting though, if this will help you sleep at night
Headlines from the last 48 hours: >Analysts estimate $100 million opening weekend for Lightyear >Lightyear box office prediction: eyeing a $80 million opening weekend >Box Office: Pixar's 'Lightyear' looks to blast off with $70 million opening weekend >Dinosaurs baring teeth: Lightyear looking at $55 million opening weekend, may come in second to Jurassic World
It's genuinely flopping lmao, $55 million puts it on track with The Good Dinosaur, a movie also known as "Pixar's first flop"
No Tim Allen is definitely a big factor... I have nothing against Chris and I'm nit really that big on toy story but not hearing Tim Allen's voice.. would be the same if they did a woody movie and not use Hanks
>it's been banned in 14 countries >it's getting the worst critical reviews of any Toy Story movie in spite of racking up massive Diversity Points >it's falling so far short of every box office projection that Pixar will likely end up losing millions of dollars on it, something that's only happened to them once before in their 30 year history
>Did we make a mistake? >no, the incels and Russians are responsible for this
lol
lmao
It's because of that lesbian kiss. Or rather because of any LGBT themes. Trannies pretty much took over the entire movement and reversed the trend of increasing tolerance to homosexuals.
Disney's arrogance thinking the Buzz Lightyear franchise is within reach of the Jurassic Park franchise is what caused this. Probably would have done much better had they chosen a better release date, let's not kid ourselves.
Shows like Euphoria and Umbrella Academy consistently do numbers. Sometimes a show is just shit, woke or not. If people were this anti-woke then social media services like twitter and reddit would've been already replaced by gab, parker, frank, truth, etc.
But they havent, because they work. On the flip side, it's the same reason SJWs/liberals still shop at chick fil a and amazon. This cultural war shit is dumb, and most normies dont give a shit.
>most normies dont give a shit.
Oh, they're starting to take the hint.
It's hitting the point where they can't ignore this gay shit anymore. Now it's affecting them and their children personally.
>Shows like Euphoria and Umbrella Academy consistently do numbers.
Except they don't. If you look at how streaming audiences are calculated, the company can claim whatever nice sounding number by whatever fake metric they please. They don't need an audience to manufacture a hit, they just need the illusion of one.
Hell, since they're open liars, there's nothing stopping them from taking numbers from one show and stitching them to one they prefer, streaming or otherwise.
When your propaganda backfires so hard that it completely dominates any and all conversation around your movie, you've fricked up HARD. Maybe Pixar should have focused more on making a fun adventure movie about a space cop who fights evil robots and less on making a computer program that tracks diversity in their films so they can make sure they're not giving white people too much screen time.
Kek theyre out of their fricking minds. Can't even have. White family with black neighbors and friends. No, the blacks have to BE the focus. Mind numbing shit. The only black sitcoms I think white people ever watched was Bernie Mac, Everybody Hates Chris, and that old 70s show about the old fricker that owned a junk yard.
Also >The Cosby Show >Fresh Prince of Bel Air >Family Matters >Sister Sister (at least it was popular for a little while)
It was kind of hard to even think of those shows because I don't even think of them as 'black' sitcoms, they are just sitcoms focused on families who happen to be black. That is something these diversity harpies seem to forget that race was a topic at times (just like most sitcoms), but was never the focus.
They didn't forget. The people making these pozzed movies and series don't come from art and creative world. They come from gender studies and politics. These are people who failed into journalist and political careers and ended up in the movie industry thanks to their connections. All they know about is demographics and marketing and subgroups, minorities etc... And they haven't not just been put in charge of selling those movies, they are making them in what they call "content marketing". Before these people you had creatives making the film, and then the marketing department created campaigns towards groups to incite them to watch the film. Now it's different, the film itself contains the marketing material. I believe this abomination started with the JJ Abrams production Cloverfield.
This obsession with obnoxious female Black folks is just sickening. It's like a weird fetish. It's literally a new porn category. The badass female Black character.
keep the faith and keep boycotting this shit. its working. if you dont see that its working, you are too pessimistic and you need to lighten up because we need you too, anon. keep the faith and keep boycotting this shit
I mean, who was this movie made for? A couple of people who grew up with Toy Story, and then decided to give Buzz Lightyear a diverse LGBT background. Kids barely care, most adjusted adults won't care, people who cared about story probably don't want to see this shit. So what's left? The woke twitter minority. And we all know they don't actually go see movies, they just complain about them for not being diverse enough.
I do wonder what goes on in the minds of Disney suits and their actors when this happens over and over again. Do they think they're the underdogs fighting against an army of evil racists? Do they think they're the good guys and brand everyone who doesn't think like them scum? I can see them having meetings and everyone's telling each other they did a good job and that they'll "keep fighting the good fight".
It makes sense when you realize those brain worm victims see the entire world through the lens of their political idea. Things are good or bad to the extent that they promote or hinder their politics.
Therefore,"losing money to spread the message = good, Rome wasn't built in a day, gotta keep working every day, this is a project that will take decades but it'll all be worth it"
I loved buzz light year star command, too bad Cinemaphile calls it pozzed if it came out today cause it has black people
It also has red, green, yellow, and blue peope
god i hate colored people
No that was a great show and in no way was it woke. Competent white man goes on adventures and saves the day. Pure kino
>I loved buzz light year star command, too bad Cinemaphile calls it pozzed if it came out today cause it has black people
if they are charismatic black people then nobody would give a frick
>force lesbians in a kids film
>why is it flopping
Is there really a lesbian couple in the movie? Or is it like two girls holding hands?
The female lead is shown briefly visiting her wife and baby, because it's not just that everybody wanted to see lesbians, everybody wanted to see hideous monkey-ass Black person lesbians
if they were white lesbians it would actually made a profit
Thanks anons. Dang, I had at least a little hope for it because the redesigned Zurg and robots looked promising.
Disney's utterly and comprehensively fricked until further notice and/or collapse.
Trips don't lie.
Holy shit it's happening.
THE ENEMY IS STAGGERED
The only recent thing I liked from Disney was Luca last year, and before that it was Wreck it Ralph back in 2012. I think Luca was an accidentally good movie because I barely remember it being advertised like they wanted it to fail. I just don't understand.
Married Black person women who kiss and shit.
homosexuals are going to learn one way or another that they are neither welcome nor accepted.
They've been sliding by being tolerated, but that's wearing thin fast.
There's actually a double anal dildo scene in a callback to Requiem for a Dream
many token blacks from the '90s and '00s would be considered anti-white aggression now because the position of whites has gotten so much more precarious. Almost all whites in the '90s and '00s were ignorant enough to believe their status was not being rapidly eroded towards marginalization and so thought they could afford to be magnanimous.
I love Morgan Freeman and I love Wesley snipes
I really really hate young woke blacks. So yeah
If there's gay, no pay
>If there's gay, no pay
gayitprop failures.
Actually quite surprising to me, I was expecting a billion dollars from this. Maybe if Disney had released this in August at a time with less competition it would've made the big bucks.
It's almost like people don't want to see homosexuals in their movies
Stop blami g the gays its pride month!
This the blacks fault, even gays dont want blacks in our movies
Toy Story 4 had a lesbian couple and that shit made like a billion dollars. Frick off with your cherry picking.
>Toy Story 4 had a lesbian couple
No it didn't
the frick you smoking no it didn’t
homosexual fatigue is real
>Toy Story 4 had a lesbian couple
really? damn i watched different movie then
They're barely in the movie to be fair
Entertainment should relegate homo’s to musicals and low budget shit-tier comedies that only air on gay only tv channels. Gays don’t care about Buzz Lightyear. They only care about fricking kids and you don’t necessarily need a movie to accomplish that.
It's a shame all countries don't do what japan does with gays - include them in their media but ridicule the shit out of them.
It was the perfect storm of factors
>Pixar's reputation has been slipping for years
>Didn't even ask Tim Allen to voice Buzz, negative PR right out the gate
>Movie's trailers just look uninspired and boring
>Seems almost intentionally not targeted at children who might actually want to see a Buzz Lightyear movie
>Attempting to play the gay rep card right in the middle of LGBT grooming becoming a growing controversy with families
>Releasing right alongside a runaway success unwoke summer blockbuster sensation
Not to mention that wokies hated this movie from the first screen shot because
>he looks like a cop who finds excuses to pull over minorities
AKA he's a clean cut white man
to play the gay rep card right in the middle of LGBT grooming becoming a growing controversy with families
/misc/ isn't real life you dumb homosexual.
>/misc/ isn't real life you dumb homosexual
>is a homosexual, calls other homosexuals
not very progressive
>everyone who makes fun of me is gay and stuff
>If I don't pay attention to it or hear it on liberal media then it's not real
>still no evidence presented
How much did it make
Budget was 200 mil and its only made 20 mil.
Nobody asked for this, understandable it flopped.
Kids movies seem to not be doing well in general because they're not whimsical enough. Nothing is just fun anymore.
Didn't Sing 2 and The Bad Guys do decently? Sonic did well. We shall see how Minions 2 performs considering that franchise overstayed it's welcome years ago and Despicable Me 3 didn't do that well either.
Nobody asks for movies dumby
Minions will make bank. Nobody wanted to see this because it looked like shit
Good kids movies are still coming through, they're just surrounded by weird stuff like Lightyear that has no idea who the audience is.
Look at, say, Paddington 2. Endearing kids film with a layer of thing aimed at the adults that are stuck in the theatre with them. Smart. That's how you do a kids film. The Muppets (2011) is another good example.
I don't really watch many kids films but all you really have to do is ask - Who is this movie for? Who's the target audience here. Because for a good kids movie, it needs to be kids AND parents. Lightyear seems to be... neither.
Oh yeah, even Dora was smart enough to target both kids and their coomer dads. The Lebanons in Lightyear weren't gonna scratch that same itch.
>Nobody asked for this
I wouldn't even know it existed if I didn't check tv once in a while.
>people would rather see another Jurassic Park sequel than your movie
I know they tanked hard, but damn.
I was forced to go to the movies to watch the new Jurassic park movie in "4d", all it was is water being sprayed at you as you were thrown about in your seat.
My niece loved it and was giggling the entire time. The movie itself was genuinely nothing, it was just stuff happening and no one was talking about the movie itself after everyone was talking about being thrown around and water being sprayed on them.
I don't want to see either but if someone said we have to see one of these movies tonight it would be Jurassic Park. At least I can see some people get eaten by dinosaurs.
This movie was never meant to blow the roof off the box office
lets count that bombing as a win
>I...it was supposed to flop!
What kind of cope is this? Pixar films would regularly make a billion dollars. Toy Story is their biggest franchise. Maybe they didn't think this would be huge but I'm sure they aren't happy having a smaller opening than fricking Morbius
>if you kill your enemies they win
pretty much all films are way more leftist/"woke" than they were 10 years ago but they're still doing well.
"go woke go broke" is cope from centrists/conservatives who are powerless against US institutions that are legally required to go woke:
https://richardhanania.substack.com/p/woke-institutions-is-just-civil-rights
>go woke go broke" is cope from centrists/conservatives who are powerless against US institutions that are legally required to go woke:
>Being out preform by the worse Jurassic park movie
/co/umblr Disney damage control struggles with lightyear flopping.
>being anti-White and pro-White genocide is just civil rights
we're onto you.
do you not understand that's written by a (almost certain) race realist conservative who is arguing that leftists wrote their anti-white bullshit into law? in other words he agrees with you.
and it's such an insidious thing too because leftists can frame any attempt to change the anti-whiteness as being "against civil rights".
read the article, moron
Go woke go broke doesn’t apply to everything all the time but there is definitely a pattern to it. And Disney is spiraling down the drain.
> by every measure their streaming service is a flop, terrible, predictable and underwhelming content, Low subscriber base, terrible app
> Disney stock is in freefall despite good revenue numbers from their parks, investors are simply losing confidence
> they lost their special privileges in Florida
> leaked zoom meetings expose them for being child groomers with they’re “not so secret gay agenda“
> they no longer create magical stories because the riders are too focused on making sure to shove the liberal “message” down our throats instead of just giving us a fun story
> they were once a company that both liberals and conservatives liked equally but since they entered the culture wars on the liberal side conservatives continue to sour on Disney. Remember that Paul a few months back where Disney had an abysmal approval rating… Something like 78%, or something embarrassing.
> so in Disney’s case it does look like go woke go broke does apply. I cancelled Disney+ after Gina Carano got fired and the last two vacations I took were at Universal when we used to go on 2 Disney vacations a year
>Go woke go broke doesn’t apply to everything all the time
In other words, there is no actual pattern and you cherrypick what films to focus on .
>leaked zoom meetings expose them for being child groomers
I hadn’t heard this one, what happened? Not that I don’t believe it, it sounds disgustingly on point.
I don't even care about it being woke, it's such a bizarre premise. They made a whole-ass movie that is a movie set inside of another movie? It made sense when Tropic Thunder did it but these dudes aren't being funny, they mean it.
>white male protagonist
>woke
Trump lost.
what does trump has to do with lightyear being a faliure
Both white men, both failures.
>approachable moron lead who literally fights himself (aka the same shit they did in Wreck It Ralph 2) to learn a valuable lesson about toxic masculinity
>woke
yes
Biden is white sadly
every other character is black
In some unrelated news it turns out my fiance has been cheating on me for a very long time but, get this, most likely not by getting fricked by some Chad but rather by literally pissing on dudes who are into that sort of thing. Apparently they drink her piss aswell. It's a pretty surreal feeling tbh. My life is in shambles but it's also just so absurd.
I'd rather be pissed off than pissed on.
Tzehehe. But really, they sent her messages where they ask her for bottles of her piss, asking her to film herself pissing but claim to enjoy it better straight from the source. What the frick is going on man, I'll fricking drink myself to death now. Have a good time bros
Stream it
Dude half of all people are women, they are all eminently replaceable, just go find another one.
Was she charging money? Honestly sounds a bit based assuming it was just piss play. Have her set up an Only Fans.
Doesnt seem like it from the messages, appears to be her fetish aswell even though she never indicated such a thing to me. I wouldn't have minded to at least try and have been timid or anything, so dunno what's going on tbh
how did you find out?
cheers fren, best of luck to you. just be thankful you found out before the wedding
Having had some experience with this sort of thing in the past, she was probably just deathly afraid and embarrassed about the idea of bringing it up to you and stuck to using strangers as an outlet for the peepee fetish. I can understand being mad, though personally I'd probably let it slide based on what you've said so far. Which again, is assuming she didn't actually have sex with anyone else.
But they saw her pusy 🙁
Looked but couldn't touch
I know it doesn’t feel this way, and it won’t for a long time, but it’s a good thing you found out and found out now before marriage and kids.
Pick yourself up, dust yourself off and move on. Cut all contact, delete any way to contact her and proceed as if she is dead to the world and you.
Hopefully those guys will beat you up and steal your wallet.
Why would you make up lies on the internet for anonymous strangers?
It's actually true man.
>aswell
it's two words, ESL. you deserve it.
Let's see her feet.
Firing Tim Allen was ultimate israelitery. Yet Tom Hanks can still dress up as Woody and sneak into children's bedrooms while their Greek parents sleep.
Should've made a movie about the potato guy's origin story instead. Nobody cares about how Buzz Lightyear, a generic white male, ended up as a toy.
There isn't even a camrip out for this yet, that's how you know no one watched it.
No idea who this is marketed towards.
The audience who would even presumably get hyped about "LIGHTYEAR" is the original Toy Story audience. They have completely moved on from the franchise after Toy Story 3 which had, fittingly, letting go of the past and growing up as major themes.
I can say with confidence that this particular group of people is also the last group that would be interested in pozzed wokeshit, having seen these concepts turn from a joke culture contained to tumblr to making its way into the government water supply.
Nobody else gives a shit besides funko-pop collecting manchildren and viral marketers pretending to be consumers.
Isn't it R rated in Mexico?
Nobody here knows this movie even exists outside of political twitter circles and guys who sell pirated movies.
>Pixar:
>"Alright fine, here's the first movie in decades about a white male protagon-SYKE!!!! Enjoy your BLACK DYKES IN SPACE you chuds!!"
>syke
it's "psych"
It's SIKE actually.
Imagine making a movie that's supposed to be set in 1995 so the Toy Story 1 kid can be a fan of it
deciding not to cast Tim Allen because he likes drumpf
and then NOT casting /ourguy/ Brendan Fraser
In-universe it is obviously a pozzed live action adaptation of the Buzz cartoon that Andy watched as a kid
Even better, if it was the 90s then that movie would've starred Brendan Fraser
Deep lore
It's all just a front, next movie it's Andy uploading a 8 and a half hour review/takedown of the in-universe remake
its like disney doesnt want to make money, just groom kids into being gays and trannies
I would say "Make mediocre movie, don't get much return". That kiss scene was another of those blink and you'll miss it thing that it could easily be cut out and it wouldn't change much, just like many Disney owned properties.
Even without Disney moronic woke shit like a kids movie from 1995 having gays. No one want to watch a buzz lightyear movie without Tim Allen period.
why do people call it woke? Is it because if the black character?
it's a film for kids and has rugmunchers kissing.
More like it just seemed stupid to retcon shit like they did when we had the cartoon already. Could have just did more with that.
It's clearly more about the narrative than the money this time.
How embarrassing that Disney's lqbtq movie is getting curbstomped by the worst Jurassic Park movie during pride month.
>deciding not to cast Tim Allen because he likes drumpf
Garbage decisions such as this are going to kill kino, it’s all social engineering.
>Garbage decisions such as this are going to kill kino, it’s all social engineering.
Strange to think that, at some point, investors are going to put a stop to it. You can see why these guys hate the free market so much
Investors (hedge funds like black rock) are the ones who want this.
This dude lost money on GME because he thought it would stop israelites from putting gays in video games.
I made 37k off gme though
It just looks boring. All disney expanded universe shit is so soulless and mass produced.
>come watch another lonely space man movie but with all the psychological edges sanded down to a 4th grade level.
Should have included all the characters instead of some other randos
literally all they had to do was make a decent movie length story with a cast like this, Buzz Lightyear's real VA, a bit of 90s x-treme awesome, and it would have done amazingly well
that's all they had to do
That would be logical. We can't have that
Cruise wins again
I'm so glad I've lived long enough to see Pixar fall.
>Cosmicbook.com
>puts up a blatantly biased narrative setting headline
What a shocker.
Deadline is also calling it a flop
It's more that nobody care. Ffs nobody cared about Toy Story after the 2nd movie.
And since it's movie inside the movie it doesn't have any impact on the other movie. It's the best way to make sure that the last people who cared don't give a frick.
Pretty based of Pixar to thumb their noses at various world governments and release the movie they want.
Chris "Micropenis Biden Voter" Evans
This has been Disney's strat since they bought Pixar, not just to crush them, but to humiliate them. They've taken the best talent and shifted them to Disney projects. Those that remain at Pixar are either stupid, or work for stupid execs. Once Pixar has enough flops, Disney can shut them down without too much backlash.
Whats the endgame
are animated movies as big as they used to be? it seems that disney has been going in with "live action remakes" of movies that would have been better off being completely animated.
For reference
Woah Disney is surely done for now!
Has nothing to do with "wokenss." I saw it this morning with my nephew. It's a shitty, boring, cliched film. My nephew is 7 and loves Toy Story and even he was bored.
It is shitty boring and cliché because it is made by woke people. Woke cultists are incapable of making good original art, they can only take older ideas and redo them with Gays and non-Whites.
No, that's not why. It's partly because this is a side story (or in-universe story or whatever) of a character that has already been featured in 4 full movies, TV series', etc. The character was once charming, but this movie lacks that charm. It's poorly written. The woke shit is barely noticeable since nothing in the movie registers.
And plenty of gay, minority, etc., artists are making good films. Don't paint with such a broad brush.
>Turning what should have been a bright and fun swashbuckling adventure against aliens and evil emperors into a dour lifeless existential crisis
Pixar just have their head up their asses because they believe their own hype as the "Deep" animation studio
Here's your deep movie bro
who would want their kids to be brainwashed
>Disney exec wants to halve Disney's income by the end of year
george soros will make up the shortfall
George Soros will die within the week of old age.
Not with his steady supply of baby foreskin injections
most zoomers are minorities, they might still produce kino but only if they find their sovl again
Why did they get rid of based and red pulled Tim Taylor for that soi boy actor from the Marvel movies?
I haven't even seen Toy Story 4.
What's the point? Toy Story 3 was the ending.
Something something bo peep something something Woody wants to seperate from the toys something something
Pretty much had no real reason to be made other than money
The homosexual Spork isn't a toy so I didn't want to see that shit. Bo Peep goes from a fragile glass figure revered for her beauty to some action girl nonsense bullshit. I had zero interest in giving that a watch. Where being a woman is automatically better than anything a man is or can produce. Because it usually comes at the expense of the man's intensity, integrity and intelligence or all three.
Remove gays from major roles in films, or remove them entirely, and movies will become more successful.
It's that simple.
Rated G , gay
>"woke" has now lost all meaning to zoomers that it just means anytime there is a black person in a thing
get a life.
>>"woke" has now lost all meaning to zoomers that it just means anytime there is a black person in a thing
blame corporations, now even if that's not their intentions everything with a black person in it is going to be consider "woke" it is your fault, homosexual
>it's everyone else's fault that I'm a fringe psychotic who has been mind melted by panic identity politics on Twitter
>>"woke" has now lost all meaning to zoomers that it just means anytime there is a black person in a thing
It's pretty easy to tell when the black person is there because of a creative spark from an artist or because it's the proper casting for the character. It's easy to tell when the casting is due to big corpo guidelines and diversity & inclusion initiatives for the purpose of propaganda.
Please explain, in your own moronic logic, what seeing a fiction black person DOES in an effort to (something something) with propaganda? I'm sure it will be a very well-reasoned answer!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokenism
And this does, what exactly? How is this "propaganda"? Do you /misc/tards even know what the word means?
>How is this "propaganda"?
The Church of Diversity is one of today's secular religions. See
It's all so smug white liberals, especially rich ones in charge of media, can nod smugly to each other about how Progressive and Diverse they're making the world. It is obvious to everyone, and everyone who is not a smug white liberal is sick of it.
>furious Bangladeshi mad that he got exposed
Learn English, Ranjeep
>It's all so smug white liberals, especially rich ones in charge of media, can nod smugly to each other about how Progressive and Diverse they're making the world. It is obvious to everyone, and everyone who is not a smug white liberal is sick of it.
And who gives enough of a shit that this is happening? It does nothing to your life, you can in fact just simply ignore it, you understand this right?
>just ignore it
Laughing at its absolute collapse is more fun
Good Dinosaur ended up putting Disney in the hole -$85 million, this movie is doing similar business but had an even bigger budget
Lol oh no! 85 million??? How will one of the biggest distribution companies ever recover!
They've lost an entire decade's worth of financial growth within the last nine months lol
No they haven't you moron, you can't read graphs you don't understand.
>we didn't need that $94 billion of market cap
I'm sure Disney will go bankrupt any day now! I'm sure their record profits during the pandemic just were fake meme bucks or something
>this is how we win
Disney owns literally almost all of the highest grossing films of the last 20 years and you think they give a shit that a Pixar movie flopped?
Of course they give a shit. Any loss of profit is bad.
Not saying they're gonna go bankrupt but they obviously do care.
It's not like this flop is an accident. All their animated films flopped hard one after another. This has been going on for years. A film strarring Buzz Lightyear should have been an easy win.
>noooooooo! don't you understand? seeing all the heckin latinx PoCs makes me feel virtuous!
Everyone is sick of it, across all races and identiies except smug white liberals.
>you can in fact just simply ignore it, you understand this right?
Sounds like that's what audiences are doing lmao
You didn't answer my question as to why your own autistic fricking ass refuses to ignore it.
>You didn't answer my question as to why your own autistic fricking ass refuses to ignore it.
Why do it?
Cause its fun to poke fun at shit you funless gay.
>Ahmed who can't read English pretending nobody else can write proper English
by Allah, what did he mean by this?
>It's all so smug white liberals,
>what seeing a fiction black person DOES in an effort to (something something) with propaganda?
If it does nothing then why does Amazon have diversity & inclusion guidelines passed down from big corpo to the creatives in productions? It is of course propaganda. It's meant to present a specific image with a political agenda in mind. An anti-White political agenda. This diversity & inclusion did not come out of thin air. It was devised in university departments were virulently and explicitly anti-White ideology is taught.
Or it's just performative PR to get minorities to buy products you fricking moronic incel.
they were buying it before just fine, so no i think is just straight up propaganda and if you're white i hope jamal and pedro rape you and your family
>they were buying it just fine
Except they weren't you drooling moron, you aren't thinking like an out of touch corporation, they don't give a single shit about your personal morals or leprroppaaaagandereaahhh, nobody with power cares about ideology. It's about money and making more money and doing/saying whatever you want to meet those goals. Learn that blackpill and stop posting here.
>It's about money and making more money
then why are they keep losing money and making the same mistakes? damn you're just as stupid as corpos
Because they actually aren't losing the amount of money you think they are in order to make them change their marketing narratives
UH OH
EVERYTHING NEEDS TO BE ABOUT SAME SEX INTERCOURSE
THINK ABOUT SAME SEX INTERCOURSE
MAKE SURE YOUR CHILDREN ARE AWARE AND OFTEN THINKING ABOUT SAME SEX INTERCOURSE
Correct
>Disney tells Pixar to cut all the gay shit from their films
>Pixar goes to press and publicly shits on Disney for this
>Disney relents
>entire conversation around the film revolves around the gay black characters
>the whole "Disney is grooming children" thing happens
Who could have foreseen this movie flopping with families?
What are you people even talk about? What grooming?
Whatever made up thing they saw in an infographic today.
Conservatives believe telling children that gay people exist is priming them for sexual exploitation.
>gay people exist
>let's give lessons to 5 year olds on anal sex
These things are not equivalent lessons.
Timestamp for this scene in Buzz Lightyear?
Who said this happened in the movie?
Leftists actually want to show literal gay pornography to 5 year old children.
Source? Your ass?
Current Children teaching books.
Photos of children on literal trans strip clubs.
So your ass? Ok.
Is this board just gonna like or hate a movie because of their politic mindsets.
What happened to judging based on the the quality of the movie.
Of course you can criticize the messages of the film, but it's not the entire piece.
What about the characters, story, pacing, editing, soundtrack, acting and so on.
I'm not interested on this film, but come on.
>What happened to judging based on the the quality of the movie.
That ended in 2016. This entire site is stupid boomers airing political grievances.
2014 was the last decent year in this website
Here is the thing.
Leftists have been lobbying for years about how evil and toxic white men are, how everything they represent and like is bad and wrong and must be erased and ridiculed in media so leftists started this whole culture war thing when people only wanted to watch some movie and relax.
Ever wonder why black people, strong woman were cool to watch in movies and everyone was ok with them back in the 90s?
Because there wasn't this divisiveness culture war bullshit. People were allowed to enjoy things without being preached on about how evil they and their culture are.
>here's the thing, da leftists...
stopped reading right there because you need to be 18 to post here.
Ok but this is exactly what you wanted so don't go crying when people don't go to watch your movies.
>Politically charged movie
>Quality
pick one and only one
Why do they keep doing woke shit when the movies continuously flop when they do it?
An attempt to brainwash the next generation.
Of course they fail to understand that if nobody's watching their propaganda, then the propaganda won't work.
Calling pixar fricking baby movies propaganda is going to make you embarrassed when your balls drop, you do know that right? Like, in some level you must know you're going to memory hole your stupid behavior in less than 5 years, right?
Propaganda can easily be aimed at children, and often is.
Or you know, it's just a children's movie and most people aren't from Saudi Arabia and have meltdowns if there are gays in cartoons.
You replied to obvious bait
It's not bait you moron, "everything I don't like is le propeegander" is baby's first edgy post.
You're mad. Try making and supporting a good movie next time, israelite.
>literally crying about Disney baby films = not mad
>people making fun of me for being an easily emotionally manipulated moron =mad
really makes you think
>oy vey!
it is mildly hilarious to see you would-be Marcuses try to dictate to people what they want, and what they want their kids to see, and then cry when nobody pays to see it
Nobody but you are crying, you made an entire fricking thread about it. You just pretend to have such a lack of self-awareness, right comrade?
>laughing at a flop that seemed almost deliberately engineered to fail at every stage of the creative process
>crying
kekw
>laughing
yeah bro, you totally aren't having a b***hfit again about minorities in movies for the umpteenth time!
>y-you're not laughing at this shitty movie failing!
>you're angry, somehow, because this thing that you wanted to happen is happening!
kek indeed, it is clearly me who is furious here
un-angry people don't make ten threads an hour about a gay cartoon character, anon. Nobody ever believes the "I'm just laughing" cope.
>dabbing on my side's failure just proves you're mad
Lightyear flopped lol
>my side
your brain is melted by politics, it's a fricking cartoon movie for children. We don't have a "side" in this argument you dumb fricking cretin.
your gay movie flopped and you are seething that Disney lost millions of dollars making this shit lol
>ten seconds of a cartoon gay kissing
>"gay movie"
One day you'll have to realize how insane you sound.
that's how it always starts
>it's only ten seconds!
>it's only a minute!
>it's only an hour!
>it's only a franchise!
Oh no, there would be a franchise full of g-g-gays??? It's not like I can close my fricking eyes or something! That will literally ruin my life!
>Oh no, there would be a franchise full of g-g-gays??? It's not like I can close my fricking eyes or something! That will literally ruin my life!
lol doesn't look like there will be, given how much money they're losing on this one
nobody wants your deviant bullshit around kids
How what always starts? Gay people aren't allowed to have franchises?
No
If you can't reproduce you don't deserve a franchise, also stop having AIDs first.
>in the entire history of the AIDS epidemic, more straight people died from it
>Who was Dugas?
Your "people" proliferated this disease with your butt-fricking practices of sodomy, thanks to wild gay homosexuals like Dugas sex was ruined like his butthole after being penetrated more than 200 times a year.
I'm not gay, schizo. Just explaining to you that the majority of causalities to the AIDS outbreaks have been straight people. That is literally a fact.
Frick: casualties
The CDC disagrees
https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/statistics/overview/ataglance.html
>HIV in 2019 is the same outbreak as the global fricking AIDS epidemic of the late 70s and 80s
anon...
Okay, give me your "more straight people get AIDS than gays" links or citations then
I'm not fricking spoon-feeding you, zoomie who lives at a Baptist boarding house. AIDS ravaged third world countries for over a decade, are you so stunted intellectually that you think the literal millions who died from it all over the world were just fricking asses?
I gave you my source proving the overwhelming majority of HIV cases are in fact due to homosexual men. You responded by throwing a fit and calling names. You lose, dude, because you made up your source.
The status of your anus is not for me to know, AIDs epidemic was caused by gay people, that is too a fact. It was and it is a fetish these sodomites have, in their uncontrollable perversion they seek to spread and receive this shit like a self-destructive cult, all of this pride movement is just a insult to normal people who see them is disdain.
>AIDs epidemic was caused by gay people, that is too a fact
No it wasn't you underage, it was caused from diseases being transferred from animals being eaten.
see
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epidemiology_of_HIV/AIDS
Fricking morons.
Spoon-feeding:
>Sub-Saharan Africa is the region most affected by HIV. In 2018, an estimated 61% of new HIV infections occurred in this region,[11] and as of 2020, more than two thirds of those living with HIV are living in Africa.[3] HIV rates have been decreasing in the region: From 2010 to 2020, new infections in eastern and southern Africa fell by 38%.[9] Still, South Africa has the largest population of people with HIV of any country in the world, at 7.06 million,[12] 19.1%[13] of the population as of 2020
>en.m.wikipedia
>.m.
>disease-spreading homosexual is also a phoneposter
big surprise
>thinks because HIV jumped to humans through a human eating (hopefully) an ape that it wasn't spread by God-cursed homosexuals fricking each other in the ass
kek do you think the massive overrepresenation of HIV infection in gay men, from literally the beginning to today, is because gay mean eat a lot of ape meat?
>it was a magical curse against gays, praise Allah!
It has statistically been that Sub Saharan Africans have overrepresented the percentage of deaths in the entire fricking world statistic you knuckle dragging simpleton.
>It has statistically been that Sub Saharan Africans have overrepresented the percentage of deaths in the entire fricking world statistic you knuckle dragging simpleton.
>see, gays in New York dropping like flies throughout the 80s and 90s is because sub-Saharan Africans hunt and eat chimps!
>why even use condoms at all?
lmao no wonder you degenerates are festering with disease
I'm saying that on a global statistic, for a worldwide fricking epidemic, it wasn't le gays doing the butt sex, that represents the majority of cases and deaths. What about this do you struggle with?
>it wasn't le gays doing the butt sex
It literally was and is. It still is today. It is here, and it is in Africa
>I'm saying that the net total of deaths, we're not homosexuals.
>total
>we're
But in fact it is. The #1 risk factor for it, everywhere, for decades, has been engaging in unprotected anal sex.
>my pastor told me that nearly 40 million people died because of gay sex
Here's some sources about how the HIV epidemic in South Africa overwhelmingly affects homosexual men
https://www.aidsmap.com/news/jun-2009/hiv-prevalence-among-south-african-msm-twice-high-general-population
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3566358/
https://www.ucsf.edu/news/2009/08/96784/high-hiv-infection-rate-among-soweto-township-gays
...and nobody is actually arguing that, I'm saying that the net total of deaths, we're not homosexuals.
>the majority of US cases are homosexuals
>and the majority of South African cases are also homosexuals
>this proves it's the hetero's fault
holy frick dude
>>and the majority of South African cases are also homosexuals
they literally aren't.
They literally are. The slight difference is easily attributable to the fact that it's a lot safer to identify as gay here than in Africa, where homosexuality is still a criminal offense in a lot of jurisdictions.
>40 million people are all just gays doing butt sex
To be sure, there's a fair number of drug addicts, rape victims etc in there
And, like I said, a fair amount of black men fricking each other on the DL, getting infected, and then spreading it to unsuspecting black women. And various African traditional cultures holding that sex with a virgin cures anything, and thus you had children getting raped by HIV-infected Africans. But the #1 vector is STILL male-male anal sex.
If you've contracted HIV in the First World there's a better than 7 in 10 chance that you're a gay man, despite gay men making up about 1.5% of the overall population.
>4-44-40 million
That's about right, considering it's been around and killing people for more than 4 decades
AIDS has literally rotted that homosexual's brain
>2% of the population in America is 70% of the infected
>and 2% of the population in Africa is 70% of the infected
>therefore it's the 98% of the population that makes up 30% of the infected who are at fault
>therefore it's the 98% of the population that makes up 30% of the infected who are at fault
Take away bisexuals and intravenous drug users from that 30% and you'll find that the number of heterosexuals with HIV/AIDS is about 2% to 3% of the total HIV/AIDS population.
Your "sources" don't even mention sexual orientation at all, unlike the ones previously provided that show overwhelming skew towards homosexuality
What the frick kind of argument do you think you're making?
>36 million deaths were because of gay sex
your brain is broken my dude, it's straight up broken.
And yet you still fail to give a single cite that supports your position. Interdasting.... interdasting.
Sub-Saharan total case counts are proof that more heterosexuals are dying from HIV than homos? Is your reading comprehension that bad?
>Confusing the crossing of the disease from apes to humans to the HUMAN EPIDEMIC OF AIDS caused by gay people butt-fricking each other into oblivion that spreed this disease across the US and most likely across the world.
Learn how to read.
See
Does Iran even have Cinemaphile where you live?
Do you even know how to read? Are we talking about Africa or the US and its epidemic of AIDs? Which was caused by gay people like Dugas. No one mentions AIDs in Africa in this context because the origin of their epidemic is different, it was not cause by black african gay people, but by people eating infected chimp meat.
In the US however, and some other regions of the globe, the epidemic of AIDs was caused by the lowest cast of people who abused drugs and had unprotected sex like wild animals.
non-brain-addled people when discussing a global epidemic, usually are talking about the entire globe, anon.
Where's your cite? Where's your proof? Should be easy for you to find, unless of course you're talking out your ass...
His delusion is almost awe-inspiring
>sure, 70% of the new cases every year here are gay men, who make up about 2% of the population
>but look at how widely it's spread in Africa!!!!
>Africa: highest infected populations are gay men
Yes. It's especially tragic when you look at the heterosexual stats for HIV in the USA -- the overwhelming majority of black Americans who contract HIV do so through male-to-male sex, even though more than half of new black male HIV patients identify as heterosexual. Though they're a tiny set compared to homosexuals, something like 80% of black female HIV cases get it through heterosexual sex, meaning down-lo black men are fricking each other and getting HIV, then spreading it to black women.
We are not, or at least we weren't, discussing a global epidemic, we were discussing how gay people caused the 80s epidemic and how gay people are more likely to have AIDs. The whole discussion started with this, the other anon, which I don't if it is you or not, tried to push in Africa into the talk to deflect the blame. I again make the point that, when discussing homosexuality and AIDs, no one mentions Africa's AIDs problem because the origin of their problem doesn't stems out of people having unprotected sex, especially homosexual people.
But when talk about gay people and AIDs, you cannot say that gay people did not played a important role in spreading it across the americas, another reason being the rampant drug use like meth. You cannot say that gay people don't have a fetish centred around having, spreading and receiving this disease, where they seek out strong loads in order to infect the most amount of people. Just see Dugas and his life style, a thousand or more sexual partners whom themselves must have had their own double digits sex partners.
>junkies
>people
pick one butthole
Entire African nations are not just comprised of "junkies" moronanon. You realize AIDS was spreading in third worlds because of poor hygiene conditions and not le butt sex disease meme right?
It's the whole western media actually
and yet here you are, absolutely boiling over a shitty movie failing
Is this a GPT bot? The post makes absolutely zero fricking sense in context of the post it's replying to
>thread full of people who hated the movie, laughing and celebrating that the movie flopped
>"ur just mad that the movie flopped"
No, you are clearly mad that a cartoon lesbian kissed another lesbian and hiding it under the cope of "the movie flopped so that reaffirms my beliefs" meme, when really, it was that the movie was marketed well and had no major interest in a era where people are just passively watching movies and less in theaters and nobody gives a shit about a Buzz Light-year origin story.
*wasn't marketed well
Holy shit dude, you fricking lost the ability to speak English halfway through that sentence. Wanna try again?
That was all grammatically correct English, Ahmed. You want to use Google translate?
>"it was that the movie was marketed well and had no major interest in a era where people are just passively watching movies and less in theaters and nobody gives a shit about a Buzz Light-year origin story"
>That was all grammatically correct English
Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
Are...are you actually ESL? You are taking the piss, right?
Anon, if you wrote
you really need to go back to school. This is a grammar trainwreck
>moronic ESL Muslim mad at gays in cartoons doesn't understand English
islamophobic ALERT islamophobic ALERT islamophobic ALERT islamophobic ALERT islamophobic ALERT islamophobic ALERT islamophobic ALERT islamophobic ALERT islamophobic ALERT islamophobic ALERT islamophobic ALERT islamophobic ALERT islamophobic ALERT islamophobic ALERT
>the guy frantically defending the gay movie on Cinemaphile is also a blatant newbie
Wow, I'm astonished
>I'm not mad your themad-one, see icant even write right.
The irony.
The autism. Can't find the joke in there?
You /misc/cels literally give this movie the most SEO traction online because nobody fricking cares about this movie.
this might be the only time that i agree with a shazam troony
>un-angry people don't make ten threads an hour about a gay cartoon character, anon.
lmao we sure as frick do, especially when their shitty movie implodes and gentlemen such as yourself are left shrieking in fury
I will continue to laugh at this thing for the next few weeks until it drops out of theaters, and then I will make threads laughing at that
you're welcome to stick around and spew your impotent rage in those threads too kek
Oh I'm a troony too? You sure showed me.
>You sure showed me.
True, I did!
maybe you better go buy a dozen tickets to Lightyear and try to stop the bleeding
>and then I will make threads laughing at that
Do you not have real hobbies?
>s-s-stop
>b-b-b--b-b-bbot
HAHAHAHA THE HELPLESS ANGER
>un-angry people don't make ten threads an hour
You are clearly unfamiliar with the imageboard culture, reddit tourist, if you think thread spams only happen only over bad or unpleasant news, when in reality it's almost always the opposite. Plus you extremely exaggerate this boards attention towards an annual pixar woke flick, probably because you yourself take these discussions very personally and keep projecting yet again
Hello, newfriend.
This "u mad" tangent is mind-boggingly ineffective because the movie has flopped, Disney will lose millions of dollars for their homosexualry this week. Why would anyone be mad? Of course people are flexing and laughing about it.
Shit, the strawmen in your head would be mad if the movie was rocketing towards a billion dollars, but it's not.
It flopped lmao
Nobody is buying tickets to it
Nobody wanted to see it
You are the one who's crying here over globohomosexual propaganda rightfully getting flopped and anons just making fun of the fact. Keep projecting though, if this will help you sleep at night
This. If installing Biden as president wasn't clue enough, the left is fricking moronic lmao
>installing
Do you mean voting? Because the other billionaire moron literally tried to coup the newly elected government.
>reality is "bait" because you literally need to be divorced from the consequences of an actual insurrection to think someone is being disingenuous
Headlines from the last 48 hours:
>Analysts estimate $100 million opening weekend for Lightyear
>Lightyear box office prediction: eyeing a $80 million opening weekend
>Box Office: Pixar's 'Lightyear' looks to blast off with $70 million opening weekend
>Dinosaurs baring teeth: Lightyear looking at $55 million opening weekend, may come in second to Jurassic World
It's genuinely flopping lmao, $55 million puts it on track with The Good Dinosaur, a movie also known as "Pixar's first flop"
>$200 million production
>$100 million advertising
Lmao
>The Good Dinosaur
I forgot that was even a thing, it felt more like a 3rd world cgi companies attempt at a pixar-like movie than a Pixar movie
>Make movie for children
>Put gay shit in it
>No longer suited for children
What were they thinking?
No Tim Allen is definitely a big factor... I have nothing against Chris and I'm nit really that big on toy story but not hearing Tim Allen's voice.. would be the same if they did a woody movie and not use Hanks
>it's been banned in 14 countries
>it's getting the worst critical reviews of any Toy Story movie in spite of racking up massive Diversity Points
>it's falling so far short of every box office projection that Pixar will likely end up losing millions of dollars on it, something that's only happened to them once before in their 30 year history
>Did we make a mistake?
>no, the incels and Russians are responsible for this
lol
lmao
>>it's been banned in 14 countries
Awesome of Disney to stick to their guns and not let governments tell them what movies to make.
> how does this help us sell our movies?
I don't know who you're quoting because no one in this thread sells movies so no one in this thread should care.
Unironically based. All artists should put conviction before money.
>movies?
>we love gays more than we love money
Nice capitalism you have there
I just had no interest in a dramatic Toy Story.
It's because of that lesbian kiss. Or rather because of any LGBT themes. Trannies pretty much took over the entire movement and reversed the trend of increasing tolerance to homosexuals.
That's because gay people literally do not like trans people. Transgenders will constantly get berated at gay clubs. I've seen it first hand.
>troons going apeshit because child-aimed propaganda piece #2103984 failed yet again
lol 5
Checked.
HOLY BASED
truly the king of games. I kneel.
checked but not based
went to pride today
was awesome
you'll never meet friendlier people
This post is a troonkiller.
Checked.
They're trying to blame Chris Evans, lmao
Disney's arrogance thinking the Buzz Lightyear franchise is within reach of the Jurassic Park franchise is what caused this. Probably would have done much better had they chosen a better release date, let's not kid ourselves.
Holy frick the troon seething in this thread.
Is there a rope shortage? Somebody help these trannies kill themselves!
Minions will frick this in the ass so hard that it's creators will be jealous
GOOD.
Heard it had Black folk and same sex kissing. That has no place in a fricking cartoon for children.
>Go woke go broke
Explain The Northman
>because its woke
Odd that those pushing the whole "woke thing kills content" ignore all the award-winning super woke shows.
Awards are a poor substitute for asses in seats.
They're just masturbation and marketing.
Shows like Euphoria and Umbrella Academy consistently do numbers. Sometimes a show is just shit, woke or not. If people were this anti-woke then social media services like twitter and reddit would've been already replaced by gab, parker, frank, truth, etc.
But they havent, because they work. On the flip side, it's the same reason SJWs/liberals still shop at chick fil a and amazon. This cultural war shit is dumb, and most normies dont give a shit.
>consistently do numbers
Nobody watches that shit, especially not Umbrella academy. I haven't heard from that turn in years.
>most normies dont give a shit.
Oh, they're starting to take the hint.
It's hitting the point where they can't ignore this gay shit anymore. Now it's affecting them and their children personally.
>Shows like Euphoria and Umbrella Academy consistently do numbers.
Except they don't. If you look at how streaming audiences are calculated, the company can claim whatever nice sounding number by whatever fake metric they please. They don't need an audience to manufacture a hit, they just need the illusion of one.
Hell, since they're open liars, there's nothing stopping them from taking numbers from one show and stitching them to one they prefer, streaming or otherwise.
>Woke shows get awarded by woke people
Shocker
FYI The movie is barely woke outside of the gay couple. Izzy the black sidekick fricks up constantly and has to be bailed out by Buzz
>damage control rat shill in panic mode
Let's make a movie that panders to a minority populous who still may or may not even be interested in Toy Story. That'll truly rake in the numbers
chuds itt malding lmfao
Disney deserved this for trying to push LGBTQ+ onto children.
>Go woke go broke
>Everyone I don't like is a nazi.
What are your thoughts on the Holocaust?
An horrible tragedy.
Why?
Russia lost
>thought they could compete with Morbius
Kek
Nice link homosexual
>it bombed because it's progressive
Then explain Jurassic World, genius
propaganda > profits
When your propaganda backfires so hard that it completely dominates any and all conversation around your movie, you've fricked up HARD. Maybe Pixar should have focused more on making a fun adventure movie about a space cop who fights evil robots and less on making a computer program that tracks diversity in their films so they can make sure they're not giving white people too much screen time.
Would it have been better if it was a Woody origin movie? I just feel Buzz has been done to death.
Besides the Black folk and gay kissing shit it just looks so lifeless and souless. It's like a PS3 tech demo.
Reminder that this woman has been promoted recently.
Let's just hope and pray that it keeps failing
Kek theyre out of their fricking minds. Can't even have. White family with black neighbors and friends. No, the blacks have to BE the focus. Mind numbing shit. The only black sitcoms I think white people ever watched was Bernie Mac, Everybody Hates Chris, and that old 70s show about the old fricker that owned a junk yard.
you are thinking of Sanford and Son. ive heard The Jeffersons isn't bad either. Also, the motherfricking Cosby Show rules
And fresh prince.
Okay, there's a hand full. But still. In a lot of those shows the black people act white anyway.
Also
>The Cosby Show
>Fresh Prince of Bel Air
>Family Matters
>Sister Sister (at least it was popular for a little while)
It was kind of hard to even think of those shows because I don't even think of them as 'black' sitcoms, they are just sitcoms focused on families who happen to be black. That is something these diversity harpies seem to forget that race was a topic at times (just like most sitcoms), but was never the focus.
They didn't forget. The people making these pozzed movies and series don't come from art and creative world. They come from gender studies and politics. These are people who failed into journalist and political careers and ended up in the movie industry thanks to their connections. All they know about is demographics and marketing and subgroups, minorities etc... And they haven't not just been put in charge of selling those movies, they are making them in what they call "content marketing". Before these people you had creatives making the film, and then the marketing department created campaigns towards groups to incite them to watch the film. Now it's different, the film itself contains the marketing material. I believe this abomination started with the JJ Abrams production Cloverfield.
This obsession with obnoxious female Black folks is just sickening. It's like a weird fetish. It's literally a new porn category. The badass female Black character.
>It's literally a new porn category
"Ebony" is not a new category.
Watching you all argue about why this flopped is pretty funny since I didn't even know it was coming out
keep the faith and keep boycotting this shit. its working. if you dont see that its working, you are too pessimistic and you need to lighten up because we need you too, anon. keep the faith and keep boycotting this shit
homosexual FLOPPED
I read the plot synopsis, I think this movie is trying to be too clever and will just end up confusing the kids who are its main audience.
I mean, who was this movie made for? A couple of people who grew up with Toy Story, and then decided to give Buzz Lightyear a diverse LGBT background. Kids barely care, most adjusted adults won't care, people who cared about story probably don't want to see this shit. So what's left? The woke twitter minority. And we all know they don't actually go see movies, they just complain about them for not being diverse enough.
I do wonder what goes on in the minds of Disney suits and their actors when this happens over and over again. Do they think they're the underdogs fighting against an army of evil racists? Do they think they're the good guys and brand everyone who doesn't think like them scum? I can see them having meetings and everyone's telling each other they did a good job and that they'll "keep fighting the good fight".
It makes sense when you realize those brain worm victims see the entire world through the lens of their political idea. Things are good or bad to the extent that they promote or hinder their politics.
Therefore,"losing money to spread the message = good, Rome wasn't built in a day, gotta keep working every day, this is a project that will take decades but it'll all be worth it"
go homosexual no baggy
They should have made the movie more like the show. With epic space adventures and action.
Not some Christopher Nolan time travel bologna.
It bombed because it is literally a remake of the 1998 Lost in Space movie that no one asked for.