Good movie, but...

The entire premise makes zero sense

>Need to strike not-Iran's underground nuclear facility
>magical "GPS" jammers somehow keep 5th gen fighters away which make no sense
>magic GPS jammers somehow don't stop mass tomahawk strike even though they're GPS-guided
>SAM systems somehow prevent high-flying aircraft even though they're shitty S-125's which every Westernized air force has been mogging since the 1970s
>Need to do low-level Death Star trench run for some reason, enemy has no AAA or MANPAD's to remedy this which is the common counter to low-flying aircraft
>Use navy aircraft which are rarely used for strategic strike
>Don't use EW attack to shut down enemy air defenses even though lesser countries like Israel has done it vs. Syria multiple times
>Don't hit any other targets to draw away enemy response units
Why didn't they just send in some tomahawks and F-15E's to SEAD the area then send in some B-2's with MOAB's to destroy target as tomahawk and limited strikes are carried out on other targets in country to sow disarray. Would have been ez.

And don't let me start on the F-14 using AAM's despite not having its radar operational

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    don't care, it's bob time

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Him wearing glasses in the wienerpit was way less believable to me than anything OP mentioned

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Bob was a WSO. They can have glasses. Pilots need perfect vision or correctable via lasik. WSOs along for the ride.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          who was Tom Cruises WSO?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            He was in a single seater this time. (Yes I know how it was filmed).

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          incorrect, pilots can wear glasses as long as their vision w/ glasses is corrected to 20/20, the meme about needing perfect vision hasn't been true since like the 70s

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          nah fighter pilots can't get lasik because the Gs can make their eyeballs pop

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      he fricked the shit out of Phoenix when they got back to the carrier

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I mean, wouldn’t you?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I would violate every article of the UCMJ just for one sniff of her unwashed flight suit.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I'd rail her. But ain't no way a b***h is doing 200 actual pushups in any sort of reasonable timeframe.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            calisthenics isnt the hardest thing for women bro

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              You don't know shit. Females fricking suck at pushups.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I'm calling it - a breakout role. We will see her in at least half a dozen more movies after this.

          Even the super douche guy was great at playing his character. Maybe too good.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >orchestral rendition of Danger Zone plays while they gear up for the mission

      ?t=159
      Pure fricking kino.

      I had seriously thought he was going to be revealed to be a trannoid. He kept being paired with the woman in all scenes, and having their troony name as their callsign is something one would totally do.
      Also, what's with the glasses? Isn't 20/20 vision required to be a military pilot? Is that only Air Force?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        the soundtrack was great, kept a lot of the same themes as the original and didn't stray too far from it until the very end of the movie with the Lady Gaga song. Even then that was fine.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah. The original's soundtrack was excellent, but Maverick's was used a lot more tastefully.
          There's no full instrumental of Take My Breath Away almost every time Maverick and Penny share a scene.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            that cheesiness worked in the 80s, it wouldn't have worked in a modern film

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            I kinds of wish they would've played Take My Breath Away at least one. Either instrumental or voice version kind of like you only hear Highway to the Danger Zone once instead of off and on throughout the movie like in the original.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              I too wanted Berlin to be playing on the juke at least once.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Also, what's with the glasses? Isn't 20/20 vision required to be a military pilot? Is that only Air Force?
        If you didnt need glasses before you enrolled and trained, and acquired them afterwards, you may still be allowed to fly within a limit

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Also, what's with the glasses? Isn't 20/20 vision required to be a military pilot? Is that only Air Force?
        He's a WSOp, not a pilot

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        He doesn't fly. He's the weapons operations officer. He sits in the back and works the target guidance tech. Don't need 20/20 vision for that.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Yo, Bob, what's your sign?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Yo, Bob, what's your sign?

      Bags
      Over
      Bitches

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Literally did not read any of that, going to see the movie a 2nd time this thursday

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I can’t comprehend people paying to see a movie twice. Unless there was some serious problem the first time you saw it like kids screeching or technical issues or something it just doesn’t make sense

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I saw the first F&F in the theater 8 times.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Based. 3 times so far for me

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Ok but it was fun.

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >GPS jammers
    there were no such jammers in the movie

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Most people overlook this

      The higher ups were trying to get Maverick killed, and show that the bad guys had killed an american to start a war

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Haven't seen the movie but I'm gonna call bullshit, unless you mean to tell me that the US airforce enjoys watching themselves be portrayed as pieces of shits.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          it's not the Airforce, dipshit

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >tom cruise movie
          >shits on Christianity and the USA
          >
          >you cannot name a more iconic duo

          ~~*Paul Newman*~~ fricked up Tom Cruise real good. Newman had the talk with young Cruise about his pro-America flicks and lured him to the dark side resulting in openly condemning Christianity, the USA, and starting making flicks such as Born on the Fourth of July.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            tom cruise made a deal with satan to retain his youth

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              That deal must have ran out so Cruise is a good guy again

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              I mean something must have happened to him, he looks 30 years younger than val kilmer

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >and starting making flicks such as Born on the Fourth of July.
            Pretty sure Oliver Stone, actual Vietnam veteran writing that movie has more influence than whatever schizo take you may have.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        And shift America towards drones which is what Ed Harris (the villain of the first five minute of the movie) wants.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Top gun skies unknown

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        holy shit I didn't consider this angle. That's why the Mad Men guy went along with Mav's plan despite the risk to his career.

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Seething gamma male detected
    No woman will ever love you

    Plane go woosh

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      this, the only other modern movie to get dogfights right was Dunkirk

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        You mean the movie where the fighter planes leisurely swung back and forth trying to evade one another? Try to watch some War Thunder gameplay, shit game but the air combat maneuvers are quite realistic

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    GOODNESS GRACIOUS

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    > picking apart a summer action Tom Cruise movie

    Feel good? Feel like you accomplished something here? Good for you buddy. Its a no thinking, fun summer blockbuster movie, its your fault for actually thinking about it.

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >survives plane crash at mach 10

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      he ejected, you numbskull, don't you pay attention?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I know its fictional but can someone actually eject at that speed and live? The fricking aircraft was basically melting

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          He morbed

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Top kek

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >survives plane crash at mach 10

          Yes he could easily survive. He was 250 thousand feet in the air, with that air density it wouldn't be that big of a deal. We've had a guy survive an sr71 crash without even ejecting, the plane broke apart midair, and that was at 80 thousand feet at mach 3.4, which would actually be a lot more felt drag because of how much denser the air is at that altitude.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Tell that to the columbia astronauts

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              They didn't eject numbnuts

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            they should have explained that because I thought it was dumb too

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            None of this is even remotely right, did you fricking miss the part where there was enough air friction on the skin of the plane it was glowing? Even at that altitude ANY fricking issue at that speed would mean instant death and they would be finding bits and pieces of “Mavs” helmet with bits of flesh fused into it spread over 6 fricking states. There is absolutely no way to eject at that speed. That Mach 3 ejection was a fricking fluke miracle and it killed his copilot. You fricking zoomers are getting dumber by the fricking day.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Maverick is actually killed in that scene. The rest of the movie is Air Valhalla.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >the whole movie is actually about Maverick seeking redemption in purgatory
                holy kino
                LOST: the movie

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              who cares, the scene was kino

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Air friction is fake and gay, imagine dying to air.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Isn’t it possible that the plane slowed down between him hitting that speed and him ejecting?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                It wouldn't need to slow down, the air is so thin at that altitude that air friction isn't that big of a problem

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              homie do you know how heat works? I can stick my hand over a flame for a second and be fine, but if I keep my hand over a flame for 10 minutes itll be cooked. Speed ONLY matters relative to the air density, if the air is thin, it affects you less.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Yes he could easily survive his plane exploding at Mach 10.3
            oh ok I stand corrected lmao

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Yes, because he ejected.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Ejecting at mach 10 is just as moronic. Unless it was an ejection pod like the F111 maybe, but the movie didn't bother to show us that. Also what even was the point of the Darkstar scenes? I thought it was going to set up Tom Cruise flying into the enemy area in a Darkstar to save everyone by BTFOing the Su-57s with it.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >YAY! Thanks Mav, you saved the project.
      >Oh but now you've crashed the only prototype and there's no way in hell they'll give us the budget to make another one, so it's cancelled again.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      It was a Chuck Yeager reference.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Chuck Yeager

        >seethed hard and got super hoes mad whenever it was brought up he wasnt the first person to break mach one

        Dude is a big baby.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          The only other candidate I remember was a WWII pilot who said he broke it but there's no way to verify this even though it was technically possible.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >but there's no way to verify this

            >his detailed description of what happened in his flight log is the exact thing that happens to your plane when your break the sound barrier

            >no way to verify

            They only deny him the honour of being first because hes a Luftwaffe pilot and Germany in the 50s (when they found it in storage) was still going through serious denazification.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Debunked. Fastest speed Welch achieved was Mach .93 at 100.8% engine power, two weeks before Yeager. Welch never even made the claim, it was based on someone else theorizing.

          Cope, seethe and dilate

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >welch
            >two weeks before Yeager

            It was a 262 pilot who locked up in a dive in 45 lmao

            Go to bed Yaeger

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Debunked. Fastest speed Welch achieved was Mach .93 at 100.8% engine power, two weeks before Yeager. Welch never even made the claim, it was based on someone else theorizing.

          Cope, seethe and dilate

          >welch
          >two weeks before Yeager

          It was a 262 pilot who locked up in a dive in 45 lmao

          Go to bed Yaeger

          Felix Baumgartner was the first man to break the sound barrier. Prove me wrong.

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    GPS jammers somehow don't stop mass tomahawk strike even though they're GPS-guided

    Wrong.
    Tomahawks use inertia guidance and terrain contour mapping.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous
      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Literally never used in actual real-world usage, precicely because it's so easy to jam.
        It's why there's half a dozen differeny acronyms after it, because they have multiple redundant navigation systems.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Real life fighter pilots have ripped the Iran strike scene apart (as well as many other things) because of how fricking stupid it is, the entire premise including the 'gps jamming' is just moronic.

          The reality is they needed to come up with excuses as to why they couldn't use 5th gens, stealth aircraft, ect. The problem is everything they came up is just too much to bear for the average person with any ounce of real world aviation knowledge. This is in complete opposite and diametrically opposed to the original Top Gun, whose premise was entirely realistic and down to earth, with the script being based off what was actually happening in the world in the 70s and 80s and written by actual Top Gun pilots based on their experiences.

          The original Top Gun is nothing more than BFM training over the desert followed by a deployment to the Indian ocean where some 3rd world shitty MiGs are splashed after flying too close to the carrier group. That's it. That's the A to Z for the script.

          Top Gun 2's script on the other hand is a fricking mess that clearly went through several rewrites and had scenes tacked on to it that almost feel like they were intended for other movies. The entire Sr72 scene feels like it was supposed to be a Hal Jordan origin scene for a Green Lantern reboot. The rest movie was written by a committee none of which were of Top Gun pilots. It's just a bad movie all around. Not worthy of being titled a Top Gun sequel.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            They can't use F35 because F35 specs are still classified. If they could, you can bet Tom Cruise would have found a way to strap himself into one.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              It's more that the F-35 is single seat only. They needed two seaters for the flight sequences with the actors
              They could have done better though, and had Maverick's team flying SEAD in EA-18s for the F-35s doing the actual attack run so they wouldn't need F-35 wienerpit footage.
              They could still have the dogfight sequence as well, just have the enemy fighters go after the Growlers

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                F35 would shit on the enemy so hard it won't even be funny.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              It's more that the F-35 is single seat only. They needed two seaters for the flight sequences with the actors
              They could have done better though, and had Maverick's team flying SEAD in EA-18s for the F-35s doing the actual attack run so they wouldn't need F-35 wienerpit footage.
              They could still have the dogfight sequence as well, just have the enemy fighters go after the Growlers

              Tom cruise didn't actually fly the F-18, and even if there were two seater F-35s they still wouldn't have been cleared by the DoD to do flying scenes, you fricking morons

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Yes because F35 specs are still classified.

            • 2 years ago
              trannies burn in hell

              Just CGI in different wienerpits like one from a F15

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            You know Tom Cruise is in this movie right, he fly's jets, he would know.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >Tom Cruise is a real life fighter pilot
              It's a shame that this probably isn't even bait and that's what you actually think

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            They didn't use F35's because they're one seaters and the wienerpit is classified and Top Gun lives off it's wienerpit interactions. No Stealth fighters for the same reason. Plus you lose the drama element when you realize this would be a walk in the park for the pilots in reality.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Much easier / more sensible way they could have handled this. The smart / more tactical plan would have been to shoot JASSMs (Joint Air to Surface Standoff Missiles) from hundreds of miles away, which the FA18 can carry but the F35 currently cannot. This would better justify flying older plane needed for its second seat. Then suddenly the JASSM fail to hit the target for whatever reason so it's up to Mave and crew to do a close strike and do cool Top Gun stuff.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Real life fighter pilots have ripped the Iran strike scene apart
            Oh yes who doesnt enjoy some moronic Youtube reaction videos with the " surprised/shocked " face in the thumbnail.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Real life pilots are unbelievably boring geeks.

            Source:. Real life pilots.

            Dude I've done war. I still play call of duty even though I've been involved with the real thing. Yeah call of duty is pussy war but who gives a shit. If you want realistic flying in an hour and a half... I don't even know, get a simulator.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              You couldn't even bother to tell a half asked lie. Low quality bait.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            This. I am sick of hearing all the shills say this was a good movie. Mediocre at best.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              It's a great action movie. If you were watching Top Gun for the plot you're a moron

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                This, you're not really supposed to analyze a movie like this, it's just supposed to be cool. Unfortunately Hollywood has jaded everyone so much that it's a huge feat for them to turn out anything resembling cool, everyone's waiting to be assaulted.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                I feel like you forgot where the frick you are right now.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Fighter pilots react to Top Gun: Maverick

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >hurr durr muh real life pilots said
            if you let real life pilots decide the plot it would be some boring shit about flying level at 5,000 feet and launching a bunch of HARMs at SAM sites.

            Instead we got a based rollercoaster ride and Tom Cruise catching a missile means for another plane like it's a football. It's kino.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >realism autism

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >the original Top Gun, whose premise was entirely realistic and down to earth
            Like where they send a bunch of graduates who literally just finished a career course stateside to go straight out on a deployment to the Indian Ocean with no build up training and no currency training instead of just using the squadron that's actually deployed on the carrier in the first place?

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >Like where they send a bunch of graduates
              They weren't "graduates" moron. "Graduates" are the kids that finish flight school. These were full grown men who had been flying for years and just completed an elite program.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              What are the odds that all of them would end up on the same carrier anyway? Maverick was stationed there before, but Iceman wasn't.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Could have just gone with an Ace Combat plot.
            >Maverick is medically retired / forced out of flying
            >Has an existential crisis
            >Decides to go to some made up country and volunteer or be a mercenary
            >New war kicks off and he trains and leads small squadron using hand me down fighters
            If I was writing the script today instead of a few years ago then it would be set in Not-Ukraine fighting off the Not-Russian invasion.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Could be kino, he could become the Ghost of Not-Kwyf

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Yeah I'm someone who did nothing but bomb people from 30,000 feet.and I'm such in a rut that my "job" is being a stale youtuber who shits on movies.I know nothing of film making or how to make an interesting movie, I just REEEE when F/A-18Es are used instead of F/A-18Fs

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            frick off moron this is a MOVIE not a documentary you fricking homosexual... hurr durr shrek is not real enough for me.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            I fricking hate sim gays, frick off loser

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >I fricking hate sim gays, frick off loser
              >and real pilots too!!1

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I like how TERCOM is in purple, so we know that you clicked it, saw that you were fricking wrong and still posted.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          20th post, best post

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          kek'd

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          fricking killed him

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        So it has multiple guidance systems, including one that was jammed but still leaving several others that aren't, which proves that they couldn't have used Tomahawks? I don't think you thought this through.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        the air base don't have them it was a few miles away 2 to 3 minutes away in a jet

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    if webms work now does that mean i can post gifs too?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      homie are you from 2014?

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Agreed it was a good movie but the whole time i was thinking why don't they just fly a b2 over the base and drop a mini nuke?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      if thats all it takes then why has america been losing conflicts for decades and is too scared to fight russia?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Agreed it was a good movie but the whole time i was thinking why don't they just fly a b2 over the base and drop a mini nuke?

        https://i.imgur.com/tKWenbh.jpg

        The entire premise makes zero sense

        >Need to strike not-Iran's underground nuclear facility
        >magical "GPS" jammers somehow keep 5th gen fighters away which make no sense
        >magic GPS jammers somehow don't stop mass tomahawk strike even though they're GPS-guided
        >SAM systems somehow prevent high-flying aircraft even though they're shitty S-125's which every Westernized air force has been mogging since the 1970s
        >Need to do low-level Death Star trench run for some reason, enemy has no AAA or MANPAD's to remedy this which is the common counter to low-flying aircraft
        >Use navy aircraft which are rarely used for strategic strike
        >Don't use EW attack to shut down enemy air defenses even though lesser countries like Israel has done it vs. Syria multiple times
        >Don't hit any other targets to draw away enemy response units
        Why didn't they just send in some tomahawks and F-15E's to SEAD the area then send in some B-2's with MOAB's to destroy target as tomahawk and limited strikes are carried out on other targets in country to sow disarray. Would have been ez.

        And don't let me start on the F-14 using AAM's despite not having its radar operational

        >why don't they use
        i despise the pseud zoomer who wants to appear more intelligent than the military and yet has never heard or fathomed " rules of engagement". jesus fricking christ, education systems have failed

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Don't care. Didn't ask. Saged.

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >AMERICA
    >FRICK YEAH!

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I think the unnamed baddie is North Korea.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      how did they get f14s

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        They got one F14 by stealing it from the destroyed enemy base which they ejected near.
        Then they fired it up and made a run for it which means they wouldn't even have an INS alignment but somehow fired missiles without one and took out two out of 3 SU-57s with guns.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          no I meant how did the north korea get f14s according to that guy
          everything about THAT f14 was too silly and contradictive but shooting down the first SU with a suckerpunch was good although they wouldn't let themselves be suckerpunched like this

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Chinese knockoffs

  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The enemy is Denmark.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      no wonder the climb was that crazy

  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    not being able to use the F-35 was just an asspull, but the rest I could buy into. Great movie, nitpicks be damned.

  17. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Stop watching propaganda.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      But you wouldn't even be able to tell it's DoD backed if you blurred out all the identification.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >you wouldn't even be able to tell

        You're glowing.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >Top Gun is military recruitment
          holy kek

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            I mean that's basically all movies where they get Pentagon approval to use actual military equipment and get their cooperation. It's all propaganda to make the military look good.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            You don't think the Navy gave them access to pilots and billion dollar aircraft for shits and giggles do you?

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >billion dollar aircraft
              >billion dollar
              >billion
              lol you fricking chimp

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Why are they next to the bathroom

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            They're next to the women's bathroom because that's where the kind of trannies that make up the modern US navy will be headed.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          This happened with the first film because of it's unexpected success causing a sudden recruitment spike, which led to recruiters showing up at theaters. It wouldn't have been unreasonable to expect the same thing would happen with the sequel. It's not "propaganda" when a film about fighter jets makes fighter jets look fricking cool. Only a total schizogay would cry conspiracy because a film or some other piece of media made someone more interested in a job. Where do you think kids get ideas for what they want to be when they grow up? Your dumbshit 1-bit brain can't tell the difference between
          >human minds are influenced by culture and life experience
          and
          >all culture and life experience is le evil reptilian mind control!!
          Go b***h about Israel homosexual

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >you wouldn't even be able to tell

            You're glowing.

            Air force is the least gay, least dangerous, and the most mentally demanding branch, 99% of people here wouldn't even make it anyway lol. Not that this place is into bettering their lives KEK

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Top Gun is navy, not air force though

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >It's not "propaganda" when a film about fighter jets makes fighter jets look fricking cool.

            It is when the US government is paying for its production. Shill harder.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              You're such a fricking moron. the producers paid the government to use those jets.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                This is bait.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          The funny thing is every country is using this to recruit people not just America.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Recruit pilots
            >When USAF plans to replace them with drones
            ????

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >women/men
          Now that's problematic.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      the pro-war and anti-war movies are equally propaganda my dude.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      everything is propaganda

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >wahhhh i kill people from a comfy office. dude war is...bad?!?!?!?!
      Nah bro, that's all fricking garbage we've heard ad nauseum.

  18. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    We don't even need to use US military assets to destroy the nuclear facility. Just let Israel bomb that place.

  19. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    "GPS" jammers somehow keep 5th gen fighters away which make no sense
    GPS jammers somehow don't stop mass tomahawk strike even though they're GPS-guided

    It's the canyon that jams GPS that they must fly through because all the SAMs will blow them up if they fly out of the canyon.

  20. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >YOU HAVE TO DO A TRENCH RUN AT SUICIDAL SPEEDS OTHERWISE ENEMY AIRCRAFT WILL HAVE TIME TO TAKE OFF AND FIGHT YOU.
    >Ok mission is go, oh and btw we're gonna bomb to airstrip so you dont have to worry about enemy jets and could actually take your time through the trench.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      You didn’t pay attention. The enemy jets already in the sky are the real threat. Bombing the air strip was so more can’t join in

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        They dont even mention them until the the start of the mission. They basically changed half the conditions.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          No dumbass, that was the entire purpose of the time limit from the beginning. Because of enemy aircraft intercepting them.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          You fricking moron
          >and to go home, Sir.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          They mention it at the very start. They say the reason they bomb the strip is so more aircrafts can't join them, BUT that it won't stop the aircrafts that are ALREADY IN THE AIR from intercepting them.

          What they didn't expect was enemy aircraft already closing in on them before they were even close to bombing their target, hence the "patrols?" line.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Zoomer attention span, everyone.

  21. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Why didnt they just use remote control drones or something?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      because then there would be no plot

  22. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    the enemy is obviously Iran

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      yeah just kind of weird they gave Iran 5th gen fighters.. unless they were russian

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Like 4 SU-57s loosing against F18s and a F14 seemed moronic to me

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Su-57s ironically have stealth characteristics on par with a Super Hornet according to Sukhoi's patent (and probably worse with the godawful manufacturing incompetence seen on existing Su-57s). Moreover, their long-touted "izdeliye 30" meme engines are still vaporware so they fly with legacy AL-41F1s instead. It's an utter shitshow of a plane.

  23. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    You forgot the biggest plot hole of all: why didn't they just shoot the TLAMs at the nuke plant itself? TLAM has an 80m CEP and they shot like 20 or 30 of them, so statistically at least 1-2 would have made it to the target. They also could have shot a shitload of JASSM, which can be mounted on FA-18. Or skip the whole FA-18 thing and fly a B2 in there at 50,000 feet and drop a couple of mini nukes or heavy conventional munitions.

    • 2 years ago
      trannies burn in hell

      Cause it’s a israeli recruitment movie

      The shoulda made it about drones replacing humans like in AC7 and Tom Cruise fights to show that humans are better than machine, but in the end the machines wins

      that woulda been a better story

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        This it’s islamophobic against our POC friends

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      they were trying to appeal to npc's by recreating the mission in star wars

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Except the Star Wars version sucked ass and this one was fantastic.
        Probably because Maverick went to great lengths to show how hard the training for this mission had been, so seeing them pull it off was so satisfying. It's one of those things you know will happen, but when it's done so masterfully you are excited anyway.

  24. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Don't use EW attack to shut down enemy air defenses even though lesser countries like Israel has done it vs. Syria multiple times
    imagine actually believing this

  25. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    An F14 doesn't even stand a chance vs an F18 but you expect them to beat multiple SU-57? Yeah. Not happening. It is an Ace Combat flick. Just enjoy it and suspend SOME belief.

  26. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I found him. i win

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >MOTHER GOOSE, YOU PUSSY!

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        this is a slider thread now

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >Yo, Ice. we may be tiny, but I don't like the look of this scientology guy. Let's go take my distinguished johnson back to the bar and bang some broads.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Was Slider a good bro yes or no

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Yo, Ice. we may be tiny, but I don't like the look of this scientology guy. Let's go take my distinguished johnson back to the bar and bang some broads.

      remember when he fricked tom cruise's wife?

  27. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    FRICK ARNOLD SWARZEBlack person

  28. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Would have made more sense if the bad guys were just using EMP thumpers to keep the possibility of 5th gen strikes at bay. A proper nuclear facility is well shielded from EMP shenanigans so it's not like their own EMP's would harm them.

  29. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Best action kinos don't make any sense. Look at Commandos, the plot is bonkers but it's still a testosterone driven Arnold-kino.
    So is TG:M

  30. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Maverick ejects while in Mach 10
    >Phoenix ejects after the bird strike
    >Somehow both of them are still capable of doing the mission within weeks/days timeframe
    Even at Phoenix's ejection it will still hurt her pretty bad, not to mention Maverick's Mach fricking 10 eject

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >The senate can SOCK ME

  31. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Why did they pretend this woman is Hispanic when the actress is Italian? 2/10 shit movie

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      because Italians aren't white

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Every minority pilot was useless which was low key based

  32. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    What's the advantage of the 1-seater fighter jet? Why does Phoenix has to have Bob but Mav and Rooster can fly solo?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >What's the advantage of the 1-seater fighter jet?

      You dont have a moron r/o constantly yelling in your ear.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Bob and Flyboy operated the laser guidance system so Maverick and Rooster could have an easier time pinging the target. A pilot is going to have a hard time flying and operating a laser pointer at the same time. That's why WSO's exist so they can do that shit while the pilot concentrates on flying

  33. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Why didn't they just use giant eagles?

  34. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    OP is right, I can't believe they did this
    I would like to speak to the kinoplex manager

  35. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
  36. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I’m sure the mission made sense in the original cut of the movie, but you could tell it was cut and reshot like 4 times.

  37. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    should have been an A10 Warthog movie

    with more testosterone and Ukraine setting

    but hey, maybe we'll get a part 3
    Top Gun 3 - obsolete excellence

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >but hey, maybe we'll get a part 3
      I'm all about more jet movies but I wouldn't want another film in the Top Gun franchise. Let it go down as a great set of films and die with dignity.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        It's definitely going to use the other characters, else why would they call it TG:M. Calling it now, we get a TG:Phoenix next.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >Top Gun: Phoenix
          No thanks. I'm holding out for Top Gun: War Ready staring Boyega

        • 2 years ago
          Stephbro

          I personally wish they'd do a streaming series about the supporting cast.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Top Gun:
      Obsol33t

      Maverick in random old metal against top kek gen7 chink drone planes (there's a twist just before the climax where the drones are revealed to be piloted by genetically engineered little jap girls).

  38. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The bombing mission was boring, trite and gay. The final action sequence with Rooster as a non flight officer in the Tomcat was great though. I wish the movie had more of that, and less about that boring ass mission

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      holy shit you mean the climax of the film was more exciting than the stuff before it? absolutely revolutionary film making there

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        They were both part of the climax dumbass, learn how movies work before commenting next time. Also it's not that the last sequence was more exciting, but that the other sequences WEREN'T

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I would say the contrast between the finale and the rest of the film was higher than contemporary films, it kind of builds up steadily, which is different than a lot of films where it's intense action sequences all the way through the film and the finale is only distinguishable by the plot wrapping up.

  39. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    pic related premise doesn't make any sense either but it's a great fricking movie. maybe the plot isn't that important but the execution is?

  40. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Dude, stop being a homosexual

  41. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The film would've been way better if Cruise had died. Instead it's just never ending last second saves that would put most Marvel movies to shame.
    That's why picrel will always be higher regarded. Dicaprio would sacrifice himself or bury himself in the forest, something to give the movie actual feel and stakes.

  42. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I want phoenix to do barrel roll on my feenis

  43. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Why are they so autistic about not mentioning who's the enemy? Is CIA this pussy nowadays?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Never would have been like this under Trump's America.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      holdover from the OG you mong

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      It's so you can imagine it's who you hate the most although in the movie it's implied it's a non-Western country because they had to put their masks on.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      because real Iran isn't so scary, they don't have Su-57s. They rely on their own domestic F-5 ripoff lmao.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        god what a shitty Air Force

  44. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Why didn't they just carpet bomb the entire damned thing

  45. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Crazy how a 20 year old film can look less cgi, be more entertaining and more realistic.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Pearl Harbor was fricking shit and you know it

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Way better than both Top Guns, the 2nd one especially.
        Acting is better.
        Story is better.
        Flying is better.
        Action is better.
        Dialogue is better.
        Score is better.
        Girls are hotter.
        Doesn't look as plastic.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Not that anon you are replying to but it sucked.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >Flying is better.

          >the modified t-6 texans in Tora Tora Tora look better than Pearl Harbours CG zeroes

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Midway shits all over Pearl Harbkr

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        frick you it was kino

  46. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >struggles to shoot through a broken tree
    >loads up for 20 seconds

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The shot of it turning around to aim at Maverick was kino

  47. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    How does Cruise consistently achieve impossible levels of KINO?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Flying jets at low level is kino by itself, doesn't need any help

  48. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >caring about logic in your cruiseshit
    Its just capeshit with sunglasses dude

  49. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    wow it's almost like it's a movie.

  50. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    169187278
    I pray I never need attention as much as (you). Yikes.

  51. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    UH.... top gun bros?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous
      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        bruh

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      make an edit with a guy from the trannie ad

  52. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The writers know it makes no sense and they don't care

  53. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >the missile knows where it is, cause it knows where it isn't

  54. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    no one cares. Don't be a gay.

  55. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I'm not going to watch this unless I know there's at least one black female fighter pilot with lesbian tendencies. I'm sick of your racist sexist homosexuals.

  56. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >tomahawks
    >GPS guided

    look at this moron

  57. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    the intro with danger zone playing felt like watching a recruitment ad for military

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      you were

  58. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Oy veyyyyyy

  59. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >that opening on the carrier with planes taking off and those signaling dudes do crazy poses while Danger Zone blasts
    I could watch that shit all day

  60. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Wtf, Cinemaphile? I expected "Ukraine vs Russia" shitposting threads because of Su-57. No way you're this good.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Literally no one cares about Ukraine anymore, two months of undivided attention was sufficient.

  61. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I went to watch this with a buddy recently. You could tell everyone left satisfied with the movie. It felt refreshing, and you always sense that energy from a TC performance.

    It was a nostalgia movie done right, it gave everyone what they wanted in the correct amounts.

  62. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I'm glad the SU-57 pilot who pulled off that insane manouver to dodge rocket managed to eject. What a badass faceless enemy guy.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      that was so based

  63. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >DCS is now full of free frags because of movie hype
    Wasted opportunity from game developers tbh. Eagle Dynamics should have release Modern Air Combat to while iron is hot. But they're too moronic. Hell even Gaijin is making "Danger Zone" updated for WT

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      You should know that ED can't actually commit to a deadline.

  64. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The russians know about the F-35 NSA backdoored CPUs, can’t send them.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *