he low-key spitting tho?

he low-key spitting tho?

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >Tolkien doesn't like something that isn't good
    Shocking. The real-life affects of good and evil on a people and it's landscape is kino and always will be. Some clichés people just love

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      in real life nothing is good or bad, everything has shades of grey and contex-dependant variables

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        *ahem*
        Landlords.
        And don't give me that opportunistic waffle or muh pension alternative.
        Landlords. No shades of grey, all bad.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          How exactly? Because you have to pay them to use something they own?

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Because they charge you to live someplace they shouldn't be allowed to own for profit.

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              Why not? Why for that one specific thing? You get charged for everything else. Unless you're stupid to think you have "free" healthcare.
              For the argument you're making you should be mad at your government, not at the citizens who own property. If you'd prefer getting taxed more so renting is free you're still paying for the rent and landlords will still be getting paid.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >someplace they shouldn't be allowed to own for profit
                Why shouldn't they?
                They bought it. They spend the money/labour/resources to maintain it.

                Because Private Property hurts your feefees?

                Mmmm loving that boot taste

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >take out home loan
                >rent home for more than your mortgage
                >free money glitch
                Capitalism is so fun

              • 7 days ago
                Anonymous

                >take out loan to buy machinery
                >produce and sell items for more than your loan
                >free money glitch
                uhmm capitalismbros???

              • 7 days ago
                Anonymous

                I'll take elastic vs inelastic demand for 500 Alex

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              >someplace they shouldn't be allowed to own for profit
              Why shouldn't they?
              They bought it. They spend the money/labour/resources to maintain it.

              Because Private Property hurts your feefees?

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Landlords are so evil that even economists hate them.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          Landlords are so evil that even economists hate them.

          I have a Landlord and the guy is an absolute peach.
          Straightforward, responsive, friendly, accommodating, when our AC broke down due to a Freon Leak and the Repairman couldn't help for another 3 days he paid $450 out of his own pocket just to have enough Freon dumped into our AC to keep us cool & comfy until it could be fixed.

          I don't get what the beef with Landlords is.
          If you just INHERENTLY hate them...then don't rent to live somewhere? Buy your own property?

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            but I do anon.
            I just don't believe in economic rent, any neither do economists

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Most landlords are good, but there is a minority who is absolutely terrible. Commies hate them because they view them as parasites, furthermore in many Western countries the law is skewed in favour of investors and landlords at the expense of young families wanting to buy their first home.
            I say this as someone who has no intrinsic problem with landlords.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          you should have a nice day

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          Because they charge you to live someplace they shouldn't be allowed to own for profit.

          [...]
          Mmmm loving that boot taste

          have you tried not being poor and ugly and smelly?

          • 7 days ago
            Anonymous

            Have you tried not being a parasite?

            • 7 days ago
              Anonymous

              lol poor
              I'm raising rent on this family next year to cover costs for replacing their fridge, and you can't do shit about it

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >in real life nothing is good or bad
        Except of course white males, Republicans, Christians, Trump, etc.
        Those are all DEFINITELY bad, right?

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          take a break from the internet you brain rotten cretin

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Self-professed """moral relativists""" on the Internet always, ALWAYS hypocritically harbor very, very strong feelings about morals in any other argument outside the ones they're arguing for moral relativism in.
            Every single time.

            It's the same as shit like this.
            All you need to do is bring up the contradiction and their argument collapses.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >in real life
        The genre is called Fantasy you pleb

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Everyone who says this ends up being outed as a degenerate, weirdo, or no moral character at all

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          Women love a man who trolls it seems.

          Is that woman his wife? Is that why he works in the cuck second house he bought?

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          everyone says this because its true and if you think differently you are either a child or in denial of reality

          Self-professed """moral relativists""" on the Internet always, ALWAYS hypocritically harbor very, very strong feelings about morals in any other argument outside the ones they're arguing for moral relativism in.
          Every single time.

          It's the same as shit like this.
          All you need to do is bring up the contradiction and their argument collapses.

          why are you posting twitter screencaps take a break from the internet this is not real life

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Child rape is always bad. I'm gonna go out on a limb and say that murder is always bad.
            Here's a question for moral relativist; if what you say is true why should I believe it?

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              if you dont sacrifice this child i will brutally murder seven million people. whether its justifiable can be debated but the fact alone that there is a moral conondrum providing ground for a debate already proves its not binary. philosophers have been arguing about greater good for centuries man

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                That's easy to solve. No matter what I do you're the one responsible. Putting someone into such a situation puts the moral onus on you, they would just be one of your victims.
                But really, if what you say is true, why should I believe you? You can't answer this because it refuses any moral relativism.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                but we're discussing your actions, your choice will determine the outcome. you dont have to believe me, you can ignore reality but you cannot ignore the consequences of reality.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                Again the dilemma is solved by pointing out that you are the one forcing me to make a decision. Hypothetically, in this hypothetical, I could be anyone, but you are the only person who wants to kill a baby/7 billion people.
                Also why should I believe your position if it's true? You still haven't answered that question. Do you understand it? I'm pointing out that if there is no moral onus then there is no reason why anyone should believe the truth, either. "Should" has a necessary precondition of morality.

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              Specific actions are a different thing that the moral ambiguity of humans. Humans, as any person over 12 who isn't a moron understands, are flawed, that makes them vulnerable to fall into the same things they condemned once but also capable of recognizing mistakes and try to do better. No human has ever escaped this duality. That is why stories of all good and bad people are boring to grown ups, because they can't relate to it.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >Specific actions are a different thing that the moral ambiguity of humans. Humans, as any person over 12 who isn't a moron understands, are flawed, that makes them vulnerable to fall into the same things they condemned once but also capable of recognizing mistakes and try to do better. No human has ever escaped this duality.
                Non sequitur. The duel nature of humanity is a different subject than wether or not
                >in real life nothing is good or bad
                Which was the original claim. I'm saying there are clearly things that are absolutely bad with no good.
                >That is why stories of all good and bad people are boring to grown ups, because they can't relate to it.
                I agree, good thing every character in LOTR except for God is corrupted to a certain extent and needs redemption both through their actions and from a higher power (the source of morality).

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >in real life nothing is good or bad, everything has shades of grey and contex-dependant variables
        Being honorable or selfless isnt good or bad, it just has shades of grey.
        The love a mother has for her child isnt good or bad, it just has shades of grey.
        Rape isnt good or bad, it just has shades of grey.
        Slavery isnt good or bad, it just has shades of grey.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          yes, everyone with multiple braincells can think of scenarios where each of these concepts can be good or bad, such as too loving nad overbearing mother rising a child too socially inept and unprepared for life. platonic ideals can be crystalized and put into good and evil categories but their practical realizations in the real world are contextual and often twisted. come one

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        leftoids are all awful people

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        >in real life nothing is good or bad, everything has shades of grey and contex-dependant variables

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        Autists can only see the world as black and white due to their mental disability, That is why they love children's media like Tolkein and hate this post lmao

        • 7 days ago
          Anonymous

          Yes and this is why the YID controls you perfectly

  2. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Also this kind of thinking shows a level of creativity that amounts to
    >I'll just the do opposite of what this guy did, that's original!

  3. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO WHY ARE THE PEOPLE WHO HATE THE VOLCANO MAN GIVING HIS VOLCANO A TOPONYM WITH NEGATIVE CONNOTATIONS I DUN GET IT
    Buffoon.

  4. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah. LOTRgays are so unbearable for being into what is essentially harry potter from one century ago

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      even harry potter has more nuance and moral ambigiuity

  5. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    There's nothing wrong with a well written good vs evil story.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      correct. and there is everything wrong with outrightly dismissing all stories that arent good vs evil basic b***h fairytales

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Alright I love Tolkien but that's a stupid quote. Don't study "evil" because it turns out the guy might make some pretty good points? Kek

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          It’s not about “good points” it’s about corruption through power, the basic message of LotR

          • 7 days ago
            Anonymous

            It wasn't power, it was corruption by the temptation of easy given power by an evil source.
            Power itself isn't bad in LOTR. The ascension of a rightful king is lauded. Being strong and swift and beautiful is considered a good thing.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          >Gaze long into the abyss and the abyss gazes also into you

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            >so instead just close your eyes
            No

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              >criticizing "Black & White" themes in LOTR while being unable to think if any other terms
              Comedy

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                I never said that, I think you need to reread the chain of posts that led you here

                >Alright I love Tolkien but that's a stupid quote. Don't study "evil" because it turns out the guy might make some pretty good points? Kek

                literally, figuratively, objectively & subjectively all of our societies current ills are from studying evil things for "good" reasons.

                I would say it's the opposite. Studying and doing "good" thing for bad reasons. Look at mass immigration

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >Both Tolkien and Nietzsche specify that spending TOO MUCH time obsessing over evil is counter-productive
                >SO I SHOULD CLOSE MY EYES AND NEVER THINK HUH?!
                You're not the sharpest tool in the shed are you?

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                no they didnt he destroyed you with a single line and now youre seething and posting with capslock lol

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                Okay let's be pedantic. How are you going to gain true understanding of a subject without giving it your full attention? Closing your eyes to it completely and merely looking at the surface level of an issue are the same thing.
                I don't think you unerstand Nietzsche's quote either. "If you gaze long into an abyss, the abyss also gazes into you" is a comment on how studying evil will reveal something about yourself you might not have been aware of. Your capacity to do evil yourself. It doesn't imply anything about the endeavour being counter-productive

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                If you truly gave it your full attention you'd have to murder and rape to gain full understanding. Which would make you evil

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            The abyss then averted its gaze, for it was disturbed by what it saw

          • 7 days ago
            Anonymous

            Take the Giger way
            >stare into the abyss
            >start to fap until the abyss looks away embarrassed

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          >Alright I love Tolkien but that's a stupid quote. Don't study "evil" because it turns out the guy might make some pretty good points? Kek

          literally, figuratively, objectively & subjectively all of our societies current ills are from studying evil things for "good" reasons.

          • 7 days ago
            Anonymous

            we got here because we did everything to suppress evil and never talk about it. look where that got us. now we study evil scientifically and that information is spread to everyone on the internet, making everyone acutely aware of evil at every moment.

  6. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >NOOOO YOU CAN'T JUST HAVE ALLEGORY WITH CLEARLY DEFINED CONFLICT! EVERYTHING HAS TO BE SUBVERSIVE AND CYNICAL AND GRAY!

  7. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    I look like that but I do NOT dance around like that

  8. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Sauron is a pretty conflicted dude though, He followed the devil to use the devils strength of will and action to help people and along the way in the end justifies the means the means became the end.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >what is this, good guys and bad guys in a story?

      I don't actually remember reading this in the Silmarillion, there he just shows up from one point as Morgoths second in command, and at no point is he shown to have any remorse for what he does.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >Sauron had never reached this stage of nihilistic madness. He did not object to the existence of the world, so long as he could do what he liked with it. He still had the relics of positive purposes, that descended from the good of the nature in which he began: it had been his virtue (and therefore also the cause of his fall, and of his relapse) that he loved order and co-ordination, and disliked all confusion and wasteful friction. (It was the apparent will and power of Melkor to effect his designs quickly and masterfully that had first attracted Sauron to him.)
        >When Thangorodrim was broken and Morgoth overthrown, Sauron put on his fair hue again and did obeisance to Eönwë, the herald of Manwë, and abjured all his evil deeds. And some hold that this was not at first falsely done, but that Sauron in truth repented, if only out of fear, being dismayed by the fall of Morgoth and the great wrath of the Lords of the West. But it was not within the power of Eönwë to pardon those of his own order, and he commanded Sauron to return to Aman and there receive the judgement of Manwë. Then Sauron was ashamed, and he was unwilling to return in humiliation and to receive from the Valar a sentence, it might be, of long servitude in proof of his good faith; for under Morgoth his power had been great. Therefore when Eönwë departed he hid himself in Middle-earth; and he fell back into evil, for the bonds that Morgoth had laid upon him were very strong.

  9. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >Black=Bad
    >White=Good
    Unironically true in like 99.75 % of cases.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous
      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        >erm, actually
        anon, all you have done is demonstrated that you are moronic or a woman and do not understand "generally"

  10. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Umm actually, Saruman was a bad guy and he wore white.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Saruman was a bad guy who wore a robe of rainbow colours.

  11. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >Sauron had never reached this stage of nihilistic madness. He did not object to the existence of the world, so long as he could do what he liked with it. He still had the relics of positive purposes, that descended from the good of the nature in which he began: it had been his virtue (and therefore also the cause of his fall, and of his relapse) that he loved order and co-ordination, and disliked all confusion and wasteful friction. (It was the apparent will and power of Melkor to effect his designs quickly and masterfully that had first attracted Sauron to him.)

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >forgot the jak

  12. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    But Saruman wore white?

  13. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    The "everything should be morally grey" morons should be shot alongside the moral relativists
    You are just arguing in favor of actual evil

  14. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Is Shoe0nhead a chudette?

  15. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    So many incisive professional critics taking time out of their busy lives to do volunteer work for twitter inc, an embarrassment of riches really

  16. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    As much as it might hurt to hear it, everything in life eventually whittles down to a simple binary on one side or the other.

    Good is to be protected even if it consumes oneself in the process. With maturity comes an understanding that you aren't the princess, you aren't the ends, you aren't the prize, you aren't the judge; we're each the gatekeeper who must do what he can for all that he holds dear. No relativism, no shades of grey. We all cast our lots, and if you don't protect what you love it will become steadily degraded, warped from its true, natural state.

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      well said, just because you cannot always perceive of what is what initially, all things are eventually revealed to be what they are, falling on the side of either good or evil

  17. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    Moral ambiguity is where lazy writing is actually at. You're either not confident in defining your character(s), or you're just trying too hard to be clever. And people absolutely hate these kinds of characters anyway.
    The most popular fictional characters throughout the history of pop culture occupy either extreme ends of the spectrum. People like the ultra righteous hero and the unapologetically evil villain. A "balanced" or "nuanced" character always ends up being unpopular.
    And that's why people hate Skyler.

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      you are talking about characters for children. you are a mental child. people dont hate skyler, you just hang out of incel infested image boards.

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        >people don't hate skyler

  18. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    @199049423
    You're not clever

  19. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    >it's for le children
    And?
    There is plenty of utter shite aimed for adults. A work being aimed at adults doesn't automatically make it good.

  20. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    >And?
    >There is plenty of utter shite aimed for adults. A work being aimed at adults doesn't automatically make it good.

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      >posts image of a work aimed at adults
      kids aren't buying tickets for disneywhorl

  21. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    cheating is objectively bad and evil.

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      hurting/torturing pets or otherwise harmless animals is objectively bad and evil.

      Not if either of these actions are performed to save human (male, caucasian, at least 6'0) life.

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        bad bait

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        Good point

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        At best you can only say the actions are net positive. The actions themselves are bad and evil. Just because you're saving a man's life doesn't mean a pet isn't being tortured.

        • 7 days ago
          Anonymous

          we do not have the luxury of analyzing real life occurences in isolation from the contex, the intention, and the outcome. manslaughter carries a different punishment than murder.

          • 7 days ago
            Anonymous

            >we do not have the luxury of analyzing real life occurences in isolation
            We do, though
            >manslaughter carries a different punishment than murder.
            That doesn't have anything to do with what we're talking about

  22. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    hurting/torturing pets or otherwise harmless animals is objectively bad and evil.

  23. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    Shut your useless broke ass zoomer mouths.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *