sexuality is complex and essential to self awareness which human children arguably don't even have until maybe 2-3 years of age. If self awareness didn't exist they would have instincts, by observing animals and especially complex social fission fusion animal societies you have sexual behaviors by instinct and by cultural pressure (bonobos always 'present' to other bonobos divorced from need/desire to mate). On top of this humans carry a kind of virus which exists for itself at our expense: memes, language, memeplexes where memes form into essential interdependencies the biggest one being what Susan Blackmore called the 'selfplex'. This sits on top of our social pressures to perform all kinds of behavior (including sexual and definitely gendered such as little girls told to keep their play dresses clean and little boys expected to get dirty) plus our biological instincts which can rarely be homosexual as it happens in animals. This is a genetic strategy. If you pass down androphilia (the over sexual interest in males) to five daughters and one son you off set the lack of children from the son with more children from the daughters --same with gynophilia.
Most humans/social animals are most likely bisexual in some fashion instinctively. Culture pressures humans in the west to be heterosexual just as in ancient Rome they pressured most men to enjoy boys (if they genuinely wanted to or not) over women. There is an artificial pressure toward exclusive heterosexual pairing where the 'natural' human probably prefers bisexual polyamory.
But leaving all that aside over all our nature and rules of nature is SELF AWARENESS which overrides everything. A long lasting human tradition not found in any species is monasticism - life long chosen celibacy. Humans are not statistics, although there are certainly 'gay' kids, even this is a mindless semantic distinction that means little. Humans don't naturally get married in church, either.
most people are. The Kinsey scale might be flawed but is also pretty revealing. All people taken together are most likely a bell curve. But there are HUGE consequences to expressing your homosexual feelings, not only this there are tons of 'approved' ways to express it. Wresting other boys, sports in general, they're pretty much all excuses to touch other guys. Dressing up as a girl for Halloween 'harmless fun', it's everywhere in society just as we have this pressure to be flawlessly straight. This attitude is religious, sure, but all stems from a desire to convert (babies are easy to convert than fully grown brains that have a small amount of common sense) and have bigger armies than the other guy.
Most people go either way. If your culture punishes people who don't have kids or shames them if they pair up with the same gender you don't have to be draconian or totalitarian to get the results you want. You scare enough bisexual people into getting married under god and country to pump out little soldiers for you.
Society has no more need for endless flesh and blood soldiers anymore and suddenly now it's A-OK to be gay. In fact the elites are worried of over population and too many poors so they are actively trying to push culture into pro-gay and "gay people are better" neoliberal hegemony.
Actual homosexuals or bisexuals that don't want to be shamed (or even people who are mostly heterosexual but experimented in college and don't feel the need to be condemned for it) only want equal protection. They don't want to be the new authority. But that would be convenient for the mega elite that no longer need human workers/soldiers when they have robots and drones.
Why can't people just be straight/gay as well. Why do people have to be "secretly" so and so?
Also if most people went either way I feel like ex-gay therapy wouldn't be so hilariously ineffective
Even if sexuality is spectrum-like, why would an equal part of the population be inclined to non-reproductive sexual activities?
Wouldn't the fact that people who prefer reproductive sexual activities produce more people who prefer reproductive sexual activities, produce a heavy lean in that bell-curve toward heterosexuality?
Or are you suggesting that sexuality is genitically a blank-slate trait, and it gets set at some point in development?
But even then, there would still likely be some genetically affected traits that still could influence sexuality, and therefore produce a selective pressure toward heterosexuality.
Human civilization had no problems with men fricking men before the Abrahamic cults started showing up and pushing their ideologies on people and grooming their children to be in line with their beliefs.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Grooming
Couldn't someone say this about gay/bi stuff?
2 years ago
Anonymous
If you can be convinced to suck wiener, chances are you never needed convincing in the first place.
My friends know I'm bi and we have conversations about it. They have a VERY distinct disgust reaction to 2 men having sex. there's no amount of grooming to remove that from a person, no matter what age. When boys hit puberty, they either developed that response or they don't. The ones that do are straight, and the ones who don't can be straight bi or gay. trans is mental Illness and isn't counted.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>trans is mental Illness and isn't counted
Ok transphobe
2 years ago
Anonymous
The only halfway-legitimate manifistation of it is gender dysphoria, and that is a mental illness.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Shut the frick up and go join the 41% you abomination.
You understand humans are one of a number of species that have sex for other purposes too, right?
Also, people who 'prefer reproductive sexual activities' are the ones who would be causing an increase in the incidence of gay boys, since it increases in likelihood with the number of brothers one has.
>Grooming
Couldn't someone say this about gay/bi stuff?
>why would an equal part of the population be inclined to non-reproductive sexual activities?
Are you REALLY asking that question honestly?
2 years ago
Anonymous
I can see how the way I termed that can cause you're response.
What I mean is that heterosexual activities are in principle capable of reproduction. Homosexual activities are not.
I was about to go into more detail, but I think I mightve realized the answer.
My guess is that, all or most animals use homosexuality as a means of population control when a local group of species obtains extremely prosperous times. Perhaps some signal cascade causes some of them to become more bisexual or homosexual, and that slows down an eventual overpopulation event.
This feature could then provide the basis for bisexuality in species in general.
With humans specifically, when we obtained civilization, we reached fairly constant relatively higher prosperous state than the one we evolved in. This meant our sexual drive was higher than our reproductive need. And because contraception was fairly ineffective back then, that provided the impetus for people to set up homosexuality-based social structures, where sexual release was possible without reproductive risk.
From what I understand though, many of those homosexuality-based social structures were pretty morally-fricked though, frequently being pedophilic in nature.
Although heterosexuality-social structures were also morally-fricked too.
Perhaps the problem with modern times then, is that most of society is heterosexual and knows the monster of heterosexual pedophilia and fights it frequently. But we aren't as familiar with homosexual pedophilia, and it's not always clear to what degree homosexual people are also against homosexual pedophilia, because homosexuality is already so foreign to heterosexual people, it's not always easy to trust them at their word.
This is all just an attempt at explanation. I still generally think most gay people probably have baseline morality.
2 years ago
Anonymous
I think its more about modern standards of sexual maturity being higher aged, than anything historic being pedophilic. I don't know about you but I was ready to go at about 13-14.
Just be honest, homosexuality makes you uncomfortable, that's at least an explanation that makes sense and I understand. I don't need everyone to be into my lifestyle. All I expect is that my sexual habits not be interpreted as some sort of destructive pedophilic agenda.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>What I mean is that heterosexual activities are in principle capable of reproduction. Homosexual activities are not.
[...]
Population control is my fringe-theory too, especially given how many gay whites and israelites there are. But besides microplastics and cow hormones I also subscribe to the notion that gays promote strong same-sex bonds, the good ol' bros before hoes, except permanently without a hoe. Can't quite remember the details but it's easy to imagine how someone immune to the manipulative charms of The Female can be a rock that grounds everyone else, much like how left handedness has its own widely accepted niche in social interactions.
Also really like [...]'s point. It's very unique and I've never heard it before but it brings up an interesting point. I used to be "straight" because I'd give flowers to girls and want to hold their hands, so I do think kids are impressionable since the only reason I had to do what I did was because I was imitating movies and shit and can see why conservative parents would be concerned over seeing kids acting gay. But like you said, that's being framed through the view of childhood innocence, which only became a thing in the late 1800s to combat child labor. The idea that there is something to corrupt in kids is a modern notion that stems from that era to rebuke a specific problem. Childhood isn't as innocent as our modern sensibilities make it out to be. Kids are naturally dumb and can't understand or communicate their feelings. They are just as likely to change their sexuality as they do their favorite color, and seeing them exhibit certain traits on the outside doesn't necessarily change what they feel on the inside.
>Population control is my fringe-theory too
Thing is, there's some evidence that gays boost reproduction in a roundabout way
Being gay isn't good to pass on YOUR genes, but if you have a gay sibling your kids would be the best chance for them to pass their genes on, plus they'll (probably) be emotionally invested in them so... win-win for you, or at least it should be on average
It might also go some way to explain why the chance someone is gay rises when they're born later in the mother's life and the further away they are from being the first child
People like to frick. People get bored of one type of frick, so they look for new kind. People get bored at different rates. It really all comes back to boredom. Same reason so many fat asses exist.
well it's pretty mysterious, we have a couple of huge blind spots. We can compare ourselves to monkeys but monkeys are complex social animals and even with them it's not concrete. We examine them looking to reinforce our biases, even our unconscious ones. We want things to make sense but we are biological creatures dependent on random mutations, sexual preferences (which do weird things like create peawieners and other royally fricked species) then pack cultures and then fission-fusion societies, and a singular example (ourselves) of a lingual self-aware metacognitive 'society?' that seems to favor our IDEAS more than our bodies/lives. Humans go through life scrubbing their own history, calling themselves supernatural demi-gods or the sons of sea monsters, declare themselves heaven mandated Kings (after they act like bandits for a few years) and desperately seek a form of immortality through legacy and monuments that depict a sanitized and 'unreal' form of the pathetically mortal, diseased, old, delusional warmonger.
What's important to understand that sex itself is an IDEA that dominates us. We are slaves to our ideas. Unless we can think THROUGH them, we are slaves OF them. Sexuality isn't a spectrum it's a set of behaviors that animals perform that we identify with and then FORCE into paradigms that are useful to our memetic systems-- systems that only exist to perpetuate the systems. Kings do not become immortal, they merely force development of concepts and industries like stonecutting, art, memes. The more you think about sexuality the more your reach an apex of philosophy and psychology that reveals everything is a con-job. Society is the moment when the self-concept escapes the flesh. We do what we do and are manipulated into doing whatever, based on whatever will benefit the same moronic 'kings' (power elite) that think they're building immortal pyramids for themselves. But in the end its all for the virus.
I can see how the way I termed that can cause you're response.
What I mean is that heterosexual activities are in principle capable of reproduction. Homosexual activities are not.
I was about to go into more detail, but I think I mightve realized the answer.
My guess is that, all or most animals use homosexuality as a means of population control when a local group of species obtains extremely prosperous times. Perhaps some signal cascade causes some of them to become more bisexual or homosexual, and that slows down an eventual overpopulation event.
This feature could then provide the basis for bisexuality in species in general.
With humans specifically, when we obtained civilization, we reached fairly constant relatively higher prosperous state than the one we evolved in. This meant our sexual drive was higher than our reproductive need. And because contraception was fairly ineffective back then, that provided the impetus for people to set up homosexuality-based social structures, where sexual release was possible without reproductive risk.
From what I understand though, many of those homosexuality-based social structures were pretty morally-fricked though, frequently being pedophilic in nature.
Although heterosexuality-social structures were also morally-fricked too.
Perhaps the problem with modern times then, is that most of society is heterosexual and knows the monster of heterosexual pedophilia and fights it frequently. But we aren't as familiar with homosexual pedophilia, and it's not always clear to what degree homosexual people are also against homosexual pedophilia, because homosexuality is already so foreign to heterosexual people, it's not always easy to trust them at their word.
This is all just an attempt at explanation. I still generally think most gay people probably have baseline morality.
Population control is my fringe-theory too, especially given how many gay whites and israelites there are. But besides microplastics and cow hormones I also subscribe to the notion that gays promote strong same-sex bonds, the good ol' bros before hoes, except permanently without a hoe. Can't quite remember the details but it's easy to imagine how someone immune to the manipulative charms of The Female can be a rock that grounds everyone else, much like how left handedness has its own widely accepted niche in social interactions.
Also really like
[...]
's point. It's very unique and I've never heard it before but it brings up an interesting point. I used to be "straight" because I'd give flowers to girls and want to hold their hands, so I do think kids are impressionable since the only reason I had to do what I did was because I was imitating movies and shit and can see why conservative parents would be concerned over seeing kids acting gay. But like you said, that's being framed through the view of childhood innocence, which only became a thing in the late 1800s to combat child labor. The idea that there is something to corrupt in kids is a modern notion that stems from that era to rebuke a specific problem. Childhood isn't as innocent as our modern sensibilities make it out to be. Kids are naturally dumb and can't understand or communicate their feelings. They are just as likely to change their sexuality as they do their favorite color, and seeing them exhibit certain traits on the outside doesn't necessarily change what they feel on the inside.
2 years ago
Anonymous
There are more gay [insert minority] here. Most of them are just on the DL because their culture makes it hard for them to be out.
One of my favorite things about LGBT debate is that everyone has their own little theory and constantly fight each other about it >Gays were molested >Born this way >the "everyone is bi" anon >Bis don't exist and are in denial >Being OP
Are there any other theories I'm missing?
>being gay is a problem because if we made it alright to be gay, everyone would just be gay >I mean, everyone knows how awesome it would be to frick someone of their own gender and be in a relationship with them because of how disgusting and ridiculous the opposite gender is >this is something we all think >but we need to keep a lid on these instincts and desires that literally everyone has for the good of society
"gay" and "straight" are cultural artefacts that are packaged and sold to people as ideology. Cletus sucks dick behind the gas station on Tuesday but joins his brothers in beating down queers (any man wearing a shirt) on weekends and he sees no problem or contradiction. He has a hunting buddy where instead of hunting they frick but he also has a wife and kid and his aforementioned homophobic brothers that he commits insurance fraud with and sells meth for. This is how it used to be, too. People would frick and not think about it being attached to their identity.
When I say most people are bisexual I don't mean it in the sexual identity politics sense. People frick. If stuck on an island with someone of the same gender, 'straight' people frick. It's a big thing in prisons, on boats as enlisted men, at camp far away from home, and so on. Corporations and government wants to codify and 'own' human experience so they define, reduce, and accuse people of things they used to ignore. Gay guys used to hide from their wives and kids on weekends and go to bath houses and clubs to suck dick or get fricked. Suddenly, out of the fricking blue, the police started sting operations where they had cops get blowjobs and then arrest the ones doing it. Taxes paid for this shit. An anti-gay hysteria swept the nation and the west and hasn't really settled down. But those married men who liked to jam it in young boys on weekends NEVER thought of themselves as 'gay' or even unusual. All their friends did it. If you look at human history and their actual behaviors, most people swing both ways. They simply don't talk about it or don't think it's not manly and Christian and American or whatever.
You care about this false dichotomy (gay straight) because it's convenient to manipulate you with and you're a fricking simp for the power elite.
It's a bell curve, plus culture that pressures people in 'heteronormative' directions. So most people are bisexual (for lack of a better word) but pressured to be straight to the point where there are probably lots of people left of center who are 'more' gay than bisexual who cling on hard to that little amount of heterosexual feelings they have in order to not be pilloried, hated, disowned, told they're going to hell, etc. There is obviously an uncomfortable line where people who are MOSTLY gay but can force themselves to be 'normal' struggle. That's not the middle of the bell curve, though. While most humans (minus culture) might be equally interested in fricking men and women who are young and healthy, we live in a culture that makes them incredibly uncomfortable about their feelings for the same gender but they're comfortable enough ignoring or sublimating that with football and wrestling or the occasional drunken kiss or wienersucking they swear up and down never happened. Much like in ancient Rome there were men who were MOSTLY straight who probably felt incredibly uncomfortable being socially and culturally pressured to have sex with young boys. They did it anyway like your average closet case does today. Society 'works' for most of us. Most humans throughout time were pressured to prefer one gender despite our natural tendency not to prefer either. Ancient Greeks were no picnic for the mostly straight humans just like today under Western Imperialism it's no picnic for mostly gay people.
But people who aren't in the middle (mostly gay or mostly straight) are a minority and will always feel the yoke more than the majority.
mindless people will always mindlessly defend cultural hegemony even when they suffer the most.
People are not 'gay' or 'straight', it's too simple of an idiotic reduction for a self aware, socially complex, animal. Animals that have instincts, subject to fission-fusion social dynamics which co-evolve with the constantly evolving instincts, and then on top of all that an unprecedented metacognition not found anywhere else in the known galaxy where the individual animal subject to the most complex social animal dynamics can also think for themselves and choose their own behaviors beyond social pressure and animal instincts.
But no. We all must be 'gay' (tm, copyright by Disney corp) or 'straight' (as dictated by the holy Bible where God will strike you down if you dare spill your seed outside a woman's vegana for purposes of procreation like he did in Genesis 38). Never mind that humans throughout history have a long tradition of being celibate for spiritual purposes.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Idk man, I like the cervix. I can’t get it if partner don’t have one. Its impossible.
Gay thoughts are same as killing baby & Intrusive thoughts.
2 years ago
Anonymous
it's not like people who are 'mostly straight' don't exist, they're simply not the majority.
Culture not only wants all men (they ignore lesbians for the most part) to get married and have kids they condemn lots of innocuous sexual behavior that has nothing to do with gay/straight. Wanting to do your wife in the butt is also abnormal and sinful. Only procreation. It's not actually about how you feel about people's bodies it's a mandate where you are indoctrinated to serve a social role. Lesbian little girls STILL dress up in wedding dresses, and want to be princesses. It's not about sex, it's about emulating mom/dad and eventually fulfilling a purpose to bring more warm bodies into the credit system. More people means more debt, more mortgages, student loans, life insurance, health insurance, and keeps the power elite happy.
If anyone gives a frick about people's actual sexualities and freedoms to express that it's the LGBT community which pits itself AGAINST the culture hegemony. What do you do if you're a Sadist man who has a Masochist wife and you both enjoy BSDM sex? Well its not very Christian, is it? But what if you're not Christian and you don't want to be in the closet and you want to be respected as a human being instead of being told you are sinful and un-American? What if you have a foot fetish and your wife likes it? Well, guess what, that's not acceptable either. In fact. Sex itself is not acceptable. Politicians don't discuss what they do with their creepy Stepford wives, do they?
Heterosexuality as a practice is also verboten if you examine any typical heterosexual couple's actual behaviors you bet most of it would get them publicly shamed or demonized. Because it's not about sex it's about social performance. Get married, have kids. Your role now is raising kids for the power elite. Your sexuality is only a joke on insipid late night talk shows. You only think you're not repressed and abused because they abuse other people more.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Why are you writing multiple paragraphs at anons who say they just like one gender/sex?
I still don't understand why people just can't "live and let live" when it comes to LGB. It feels like everyone wants to dictate other's sexuality. If someone wants to be bi/attracted to both, fine. If they want/feel attracted to only one sex, fine. The whole "no one is bi"/ "everyone is bi" thing gets annoying.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>I still don't understand why people just can't "live and let live" when it comes to LGB. It feels like everyone wants to dictate other's sexuality. If someone wants to be bi/attracted to both, fine. If they want/feel attracted to only one sex, fine. The whole "no one is bi"/ "everyone is bi" thing gets annoying.
Because people are desperate for power and approval. Shit, the neogender crowd want the power to order you to emotionally validate them, no matter what you really think. They don't even want people to agree with them, they just want the symbolic ritual of approval.
Where did that anti-gay hysteria come from?
Y'know, if everybody is secretly okay with doing gay shit.
If Christians had wanted to be okay with gay people they could've done it a long time ago, the parts of the Bible that are against gay stuff could be easily ignored or re-interpreted. They do that with plenty of the other commandments.
>could be re-interpreted
They already were to create the excuse for bigotry you're pretending to have. Any actual bible scholar can tell you that.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Okay, so what made them want to interpret it that way.
My core question is:
If everybody is secretly fine with homosexuality or bisexuality, why is it so frequently scorned in the open?
I'm not really all that against homosexuality, my self. As a straight guy, I have the standard response of gay guys > gross, gay girls > hot.
But I acknowledge internally that finding gay guys gross isn't a good reason for looking down upon them or making them illegal.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Because people's interpretation of the bible and tradition means it's a hammer to deal with any loose nails. It's about control.
2 years ago
Anonymous
It would depend on what them you're talking about, because biblical reinterpretation has existed pretty much from the start. Usually the answer is simply enforcing a power structure to suit the people with an interest in control. The bible produces, among other things, a number of useful scapegoats, which all authorities love having available.
2 years ago
Anonymous
As for the frequency point, keep in mind we're looking at things from the perspective of a society that's already been immersed in particular semi-global narratives for longer than anyone's been alive. It's very easy to maintain certain moral bugbears when the peasants think their religion is natural and not an invention of the clergy to dominate their followers and extract money.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Anything you're reading form teh bible has been passed through protestant English translations.
That being said, Jesus Christ our Lord never said anything about homosexuality being unacceptable. You're not going to convince me that a man who associated with lepers would have a problem with gays.
Whats worse, a man loving another man, or a debilitating contagious disease that makes your fricking skin fall off?
2 years ago
Anonymous
what is a soul to you?
2 years ago
Anonymous
We are all the same soul who lack the perspective to understand that we are all the perfect creation of God existing simultaneously. We're both the same person, everyone is.
Heaven is harmony within that one soul
Hell is the understanding of how much you've hurt yourself.
2 years ago
Anonymous
your formatting is way too formal for a shitposting federal honeypot.
2 years ago
Anonymous
I just like sucking wiener dude I don't know what you want from me.
2 years ago
Anonymous
suck wiener a little less formally.
2 years ago
Anonymous
No
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Jesus Christ our Lord never said anything about homosexuality being unacceptable
This. I love that dude.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Jesus is inside you
2 years ago
Anonymous
Everyone is not ok with it, the frick are you talking about? It’s disgusting, and humans literally kill each other over less.
It came from their own obnoxious ungrateful behavior of forcing their sexual preferences into every facet of society, beyond what even straight people do, also record grooming and STDs
2 years ago
Anonymous
That's definitely a recent phenomenon that's making it a bit harder to maintain my gay-guys-are-ok-despite-being-gross position.
But it's possible that this phenomenon is being manufactured by forces outside gay people's control.
Also I'm not sure how present this phenomenon was in the past.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>it's possible this convenient right-wing meme to poorly excuse bigotry is being manufactured
impossible
2 years ago
Anonymous
There were several documented events recently of men in drag displaying themselves or otherwise being inappropriate to children.
That shits disturbing, and until the gay community untethers themselves from the movement supporting this shit, it reflects badly on them too.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>rightoid talking points they cooked up after making trannies their target following the loss of gay marriage as a viable culture war issue >won't someone PLEEEEEASE think of the children
wow how compelling
>sees no problem or contradiction
This Cletus you're talking about of course sees a problem as he is always keeping his fricking a secret and thinking about fuxking when he's at home with his family. It's a hyperminority of men that are interested in sucking wiener. That's just you
>Bis don't exist and are in denial
Dunno about this. I enjoy sex both with woman and man.
But I will never be sure if I would miss wiener on the long run.
Yeah I know that you just listed this things. I hear this everytime and I will never understand why are ppl mad about bis.
Thank you Anon.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Frick you bis are just bored straights. All they do is break gay hearts because inevitably they decided they have to frick a b***h to 'continue' their legacy.
As if anything matters once our galaxy gets pushed over the universal waterfall and we all become meaningless information until the next big bang
Yeah, that's pretty much what I suspect as well. I wouldn't call myself 'bi', but I could see the process by which I've become attracted some rather revolting women, also working on men. I don't really want to know.
The conclusion of this post, btw, is that you can indeed pressure children to become gay.
What kind of backwards hillbilly shithole do you live in where second graders have already been taught how to hate? Usually that shit starts in like middle school
I discovered I was bisexual at 12 years old after accidentally finding gay zelda porn on the internet
Didn't help that Death Note was new around the time and L was hot as frick
Obviously I mean Link.
Specifically the Ocarina of Time verison since that was the recognizable one at the time. Twilight Princess wasn't even out yet.
I specifically remember browsing the internet and stumbling on art of Link getting fricked in the ass and being confused and aroused and angry.
Nah, my grandpa bought me a VHS set with 100 of the "greatest" (too old to be expensive to repackage) cartoons so I could watch it in on 8 inch tv built into his car during road trips. One of them was the Betty Boop cartoon that ends with her laughing at how successful her diet was and inexplicably fattening up. It was immediately my favorite for reasons I couldn't explain.
I remember feeling very guilty but secretly happy shopping for underwear when I was a kid (like 7 or so?) just staring at bulges while I tried to hide me looking from mother.
Never molested, had both parents, great male role models. Never found out what gay was till middle school, when it clicked.
straight fragility is a thing. being gay makes you 'less of a man' and touching your pooper makes you gay.
I've seen (largely) amerimutts, defending that they don't use a bidet because water touching your butthole would turn them gay and damn them to an eternity in hell.
>batman and robin was directed by Joel Schumacher >Schumacher described himself as "extremely promiscuous", saying in a 2019 interview that he became sexually active at age eleven, and estimating that he had sex with between 10,000 and 20,000 men over the course of his life.
God I hate comics like these, and not just the ones made by this homosexual
wow we get it, random commonplace things not meant to be sexualized turned you gay
very funny and relatable, thank you for letting us know 50 times
It's this guy's version of the "lol, brain reminds me of an unrelated awkward situation when I finally enjoy myself/am going to bed"
I remember this happening but not the reception. But I totally would.
>Yes, using a paper towel is worst for the environment than a reusable wet towel, but boy are we socially conscious!
I put that with all the brands suddenly gloating about "responsible" farming a few years ago. And what have you been doing for the past 60 years? Being irresponsible little shits? >Yeah, but now I've come clean.
And you'll get nothing from me but a laugh.
I'm trying to imagine the story told by this sequence.
A happy dude, enjoying the white skin and green pea-ness of his life. This goes awry, leading him to become green himself, drowning him in a maudlin existence.
Then, he discovers corn and shit's great again. Then he gets a girl who is willing to get murdered by him and he is psychotically ecstatic. After murdering four women he's feeling pretty good. This leads him to be enjoy peas for their inherent pea-ness. But he doesn't forget his love of corn.
In the 60s he realized his hatred of women stemmed from his latent homosexuality and is happy as a bear. Then he gives being a bottom a try for a while. Finally he just enjoys hanging out, free as a bird.
He got cold for awhile and so murdered an anime character for his scarf. Finally, leading him to being the confidant beast we have today.
>A happy dude, enjoying the white skin and green pea-ness of his life.
Now he's an even happier dude, enjoying the white cum and green penis in his life.
I like what they were going for with the scarf, nice contrast, but it didn't quite match the design, like why give him a scarf when he's wearing a toga? He clearly doesn't care about the cold. I'd have given him gloves or a hood or something. Anyway I love the colors on 2014 also.
only one i woulden't outright go with 'gay' since i knew alot of boys that got dragged into watching it and getting there own sailor waifu's back in the day.
Well she's already there and depending on how bad is your condition, if you could just take five while a more able adult carries you to help, or maybe provide help themselves, would be appreciated.
Powerpuff girls isn't anything like a magical girl manga/anime. If you were going to say Sailor Moon, the other should have been something like winx club or WITCH.
For me it was Totally Spies.
I wasn't even aware of the fetish shit as a kid, I just legitimately thought it was cool.
I was kinda ashamed to watch it cuz it was a girl's show, though. Britney needed more episodes.
Sailor Moon was fricking awesome and was extremely high action compared to other crap on at the time. You'd be a huge loser kid to not play Sailor Moon. Mars > Mercury, he does have homosexual tastes though.
I can relate because I got my first rock hard boner watching the 2003 Hulk movie as a 5 y/o, all the scenes of Bruce transforming into Hulk turned me on before I even knew what that meant.
I think it was like 5 years ago or something when this same dude did his 'what I do during summer' comic and it was him posing like a homosexual while drinking some fru fru tropical fruit alcoholic smoothie at the beach like some kind of prancing la la homosexual man.
It's weird that adults now say it's wrong for kids to early on feel sexual attraction towards stuff, especially on
/co/. Not to say kids aren't impressionable and won't be talked into believing they're gay. I remember being a wee lad going to see Tokyo Drift with my dad and realizing asian girls made me horny. I think it's just natural kids have reactions like that they just don't know what it means or can't put it into words.
Posting on Cinemaphile amplifies this, but people have trouble adjusting their perspective to how their brain used to work. We always make the joke on here that cartoonists were making their fetish and kids get corrupted... but mostly that's probably just retroactive thinking. We get exposed to tons of shit, and baseline humans tend to form fetishes... so if it wasnt over the muscle growth or something you didn't really do much on when you first saw it, it'd be for the funny nose you saw on the one beautiful lady two tribes over or whatever.
Most people who saw Lola Bunny didnt become furries. Most people who saw He Man and Skeletor going at it didn't become gay.
Most people are straight, some people are fully gay. Very few people were on the precipice until they saw a burly lumberjack paper towel mascot
It might be worth noting that things like the Brawny mascot or Batman and Robin being gay awakenings are staple gay in-jokes too. A gay audience isn't going to question the plausibility.
I think some people are aware of what your talking about. Their aware that seeing certain things in certain contexts can produce a permanent rewiring of their mind. And if that rewiring causes them to have unnatural or immoral preferences, then that event will be undesirable.
So if, as an adult, they see shit similar to what they saw get directed at kids, it's understandable for them to be upset.
He was talking about media causing kid's to make realizations about themselves.
The thing is, kids are so malleable at that point that they could, at different points in their development, discover different contradictory things about themselves.
So the realization they're making is more like a fleeting thought that gets turned into a near-permanent attribute by the implication of acceptance by an authority figure (whatever media it is that they are consuming).
I believe he's talking about realizing something more fundamental about yourself, not having a stray thought that Bat-butt is sexy because Schumacher blasted a 40-foot picture of one at you. They are potentially similar in the cause but not in how they feel.
It is true to an extent that kids sometimes at different points realize contradictory things, but usually that's because kids will assume they're 'normal' and not consider something like bisexuality until later. Starting with the assumption that you're gay is possible but a weird leap for any kid to make. Note that the jokes in the comic start with an implicit assumption of heterosexuality being upended by something. The kid already knows what gay and straight are but hadn't considered himself gay before.
If looking a women could make you straight a young age, no one would ever be gay. I remember seeing stripperilla as a kid and getting nothing out of unless a guy was there to make a dick joke.
I'm really more focusing on weird fetishes than homo/heterosexuality.
I'm willing to believe that that sexuality can come from something deeper.
At the same time, I wouldn't entirely rule out the possibility that circumstances could have a heavy impact on sexual orientation.
I bet corporations are glad they don't have to do go through all the effort of becoming green or whatever anymore and they can just change some branding to make the left happy. Probably saves them tons of money.
I don't know the exact history of KKK and blacks, so I can't talk about that.
But the shit the lgbtq community is doing nowadays is disturbing. I want to believe the lgb portion of the community is separate from them, and lgbtq is just using the lgb to maintain credibility. They seem to have a pattern of taking terms from other more credible-looking marginalized-group's movements.
Sexuality is not essential. Sex is not essential to your existence. This whole fricking ideology rests upon the flimsy notion that sex is somewhat necessary in our day to day live. No. People need to wake up, but they don't want to.
Wasn't this the comic artist who had a comic idea stolen by short-film-makers?
But then it turns out he stole a comic idea from somebody else.
But ge doubled down by editing his comic archive to make it look like his version was older, but it didn't match the InternetArchive cache.
So he is a thief that tried to frame the original artist as a thief.
Was raped and groomed as a kid.
Something vad happened that I can't fully remember but makes me feel real fricked up
Now I'm pan, hypersexual, have a terrible sexual compulsion problem and will have dangerous sex with almost anyone if there is no possibility of there being a relationship or actual closeness.
Just had god awful sex an hour ago with a gross person I don't even know
fricked the dog shit out of them nutted washed my dick in the sink and left without saying a word
tried to kill myself in the post sex suicidal depressive haze on the drive back home
I actually honestly hate sex to be honest and will go back on libido killing amounts of steroids.
Problem. is that I become attractive and a textbook stud when I do that.
Yeah, what I find horrible about our current reality, is that it seems those frickers can pretty much play with our fricking society like putty in their hands.
Like, what kind of sick shit will they do next? Do we have any control over it at all?
I find the people doing their work disgusting, but, yeah, that almost makes me complicit, since my reaction of anger and disgust is part of their designs.
And it's difficult to know what we can do or should do to stop them, since it's not outside of the possibility that it's practically impossible.
And all we can really hope for is some sort of black swan event to topple their order.
There are two types of self-insert artists.
Those who draw themselves as ugly, average, or as basic as what they actually look like in real life.
Or, those who draw themselves as supermodels only.
In the new brawny commercials his jeans are too baggy and you can't even see his buttcheeks as he walks away. They nerfed him because he was too sexy and don't even show his face
>entire basis of Christianity often includes the concept of inherited sin
CRT is just about pointing out that it's super easy to show that just because legally you can't say "no blacks allowed" anymore, there still are plenty of laws/social constructs out there that have a similar effect.
Basically, don't feel guilty for being white... but maybe feel some guilt if you bought into talking points about how the wealthy part of your city (that got that way due to snapping up federal housing stuff/GI bill benefits preferentially for whites and has HOAs that previously barred blacks) deserves to become it's own district and not pay taxes into funding the black... I mean "intercity" schools or whatever.
This description is clearly an ideology, not a field of study. This is not about facts, it is about politicized interpretation of facts and assumptions based on those interpretations and then making broad sweeping assumptions based on those already assumed interpretations.
This is science or history. Its not even objective enough to be philosophy. This ideology, and frankly does seem inappropriate to teach as fact to young children alongside chemistry and biology.
conservatives are the dimmest most gullible people alive
the worst part is this is how conservatives operate off of Cinemaphile too
you're all actually this stupid everywhere
thats cool
have you decided whether or not CRT exists or not yet, or whether its only taught in law school, or whether its just basic history?
you already lost this fight two years ago, but don't let me stop you from continuing to aimlessly flail around
I do see how institutions can be racist, but at this point the cause and affect of racial differences has looped around so many times it's hard to know what's innate.
At this point in time, there is a difference between black and white people in America. I'm of the opinion, that it probably is caused by an accumulation of the shitty treatment are elites have caused to befall black people.
This results in them being more prone to violence and crime, which in turn, cause white people who wouldn't otherwise be racist against them, to become racist against them.
It's just another way that the elites has molded our society against us all.
What would be wrong with sending them back to Africa at that point in time (1870)? Especially when America had been nothing but hell for them up to that point? Why would they want to continue living near people who hated them so much and viewed them as subhuman?
Sure anon, they're all over this board that hates them, they're in the room right now, they're in your walls making you browse /ss/ and e-girl threads.
Trannies are always whining about how the world hates them, and they're at risk of suicide and violence, and a troony genocide is right around the corner.
But then when you ask, why are such a ridiculous number of kids coming out as trans or nonbinary nowadays, how do they respond?
"The world is much more accepting of trans people now, so they are comfortable with coming out as their true selves."
Almost like things can be marginally better but still not great.
Almost like the US has more accepting areas and more regressive areas.
You'd undoubtedly accept that its easier to be openly gay now than 20 years ago, yet here you and other anons still are calling them groomers and to kill themselves for simply existing.
So when most of a friend group of girls all decide they're boys or otherwise not-girls, that's just because it's become more acceptable within their local environment?
I do agree with a certain part of your imagery, there are more accepting areas and less accepting areas. But there are also areas where it's so acceptable to be trans/nb, that it actually becomes less acceptable not to be.
And that's where troony-shit is a social contagion.
>we stop repressing a thing with violence and people feel more comfortable expressing it
You know interracial relationships were more common after the 50s too? Must be a mental illness!
I will never stop being surprised by how fricking stupid conservatives can be. 4 year olds can process cause and effect better than the average rightoid
2 years ago
Anonymous
There are two potential causes here.
That it's acceptable to be what you were all along.
Or it's trendy to pretend to be something that is so broadly defined that no one can contest that you aren't.
We have plenty of examples in the past of kids getting involved in some counter-culture thing that changes their outfit, language, and beliefs for a while. And then eventually they discard it.
And having a whole group of girls decide they are part of an extremely small minority that is supposed to be based on immutable trait, is plenty strange.
The only explanation that could work for you, is that the girls subconsciously knew that the others were also trans-inside, and became friends on that subconscious basis.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>gays only started existing because it was trendy, and nothing to do with the fact they got civil rights recognition so they were comfortable coming out
again, even 4 year olds have a better grasp of cause and effect than typical rightoids larping as logical.
2 years ago
Anonymous
You can't fake homosexuality. Not for long anyway.
You can EASILY fake trans/nb-shit. All you have to say is that,
"Oh, I've been doing some introspection, and realized my personality doesn't align PERFECTly with the ideals society has set for my sex. So, therefore, you have to change your language when you talk about me, so that you obfuscate any information on what my sex is, and validate whatever words I think reflects my gender identity better."
>But then when you ask, why are such a ridiculous number of kids coming out as trans or nonbinary nowadays, how do they respond?
By pointing out that things have improved considerably for these groups as acceptance and understanding has gotten better, and there are plenty of public role models for young people who want to come out to identify with now, but despite this there are still plenty of people still just want to discriminate and hate you for being different and it's politically expedient for the right to fearmonger over the topic for easy votes, which encourages that hate and fear.
fake. transexuals just want everybody to express their natural sexual preferences and desire, that also includes children who need to be guided by adults who already have the knowledge, this is called education, something you will never have.
>Transexuals just want everybody to express their natural sexual preferences and desire, >that also includes children who need to be guided by adults who already have the knowledge
Are you able to rephrase this in a way that is less creepy-sounding.
I could interpret it in a favorable way toward you, but I'd first like to know that my interpretation is accurate.
No, Christopher Rufo is not responsible for pushing CRT in schools, and there is nothing wrong with that definiton. If you rename CRT to.anything else, people will still be opposed to it, because they are opposed to the insane ideology underlying it, not to the name.
CRT is propaganda, and you haven't even said what your issue is with the actual definition, instead trying some weird ad hominem about the definition provided.
>It's gotten to the point to where alternative language like "involuntary relocated labor" is being suggested to get around saying "slavery"
And this is largely pushed by right wingers instead of liberals. Florida also has a law proposed to block history topics that give (white) children discomfort.
again, whatever you need to believe to avoid killing yourself I suppose. I'm a cis straight dude more of a man than you'll ever be.
You can't fake homosexuality. Not for long anyway.
You can EASILY fake trans/nb-shit. All you have to say is that,
"Oh, I've been doing some introspection, and realized my personality doesn't align PERFECTly with the ideals society has set for my sex. So, therefore, you have to change your language when you talk about me, so that you obfuscate any information on what my sex is, and validate whatever words I think reflects my gender identity better."
Yeah I get it, you think you see trans people around every corner. They're in your walls and the only explanation is they do it to spite you.
Cope, groomer.
I find a lot of the noisiest troon advocates in social media are claiming to be straight or asexual so they can play the rent-free card, which has no effect when played by an overt member of the group in question.
Royal people get to append some honorific in front of their face, and they get to watch common people have to force themselves to honor your change or else face the power you hold.
Same thing with trannies, the main difference is that they're still accumulating power. So they're powerplay is only partially effective. As someone else said here, they are more accepted in certain areas than others.
They certainly seem to have some surface-level power in a lot of corporations, due to Black Rock forcing woke talking points onto them.
But fortunately on here, I can say to troony men, "You will never be a woman." And the worse that might happen is some janny closes the thread earlier than is justified.
But I can't say that on Reddit or Twitter without getting banned.
And I've heard that alot of schools and workplaces are also getting pretty strict about that shit.
> # >again, whatever you need to believe to avoid killing yourself I suppose. I'm a cis straight dude more of a man than you'll ever be. >
You can't fake homosexuality. Not for long anyway.
You can EASILY fake trans/nb-shit. All you have to say is that,
"Oh, I've been doing some introspection, and realized my personality doesn't align PERFECTly with the ideals society has set for my sex. So, therefore, you have to change your language when you talk about me, so that you obfuscate any information on what my sex is, and validate whatever words I think reflects my gender identity better." # >Yeah I get it, you think you see trans people around every corner. They're in your walls and the only explanation is they do it to spite you.
Royal people get to append some honorific in front of their face, and they get to watch common people have to force themselves to honor your change or else face the power you hold.
Same thing with trannies, the main difference is that they're still accumulating power. So they're powerplay is only partially effective. As someone else said here, they are more accepted in certain areas than others.
They certainly seem to have some surface-level power in a lot of corporations, due to Black Rock forcing woke talking points onto them.
But fortunately on here, I can say to troony men, "You will never be a woman." And the worse that might happen is some janny closes the thread earlier than is justified.
But I can't say that on Reddit or Twitter without getting banned.
And I've heard that alot of schools and workplaces are also getting pretty strict about that shit.
>it's a fricking powerplay
Holy frick conservatives are so fricking fragile LMAO. Just KYS if you're this weak.
Yeah, it's kind of like how the IRS can't afford to go after sufficiently rich people who cheat the tax system, so they instead go after the poor people.
If you've got a system set up that demonizes white people, will it do anything substantial to the white people who are ACTUALLY causing all the harm that minorities are suffering from?
No, because they have protections layered upon protections to insulate them from your influence.
Good cope, so far, everyone is able to identify you're a moron instantly, and the best part is you don't even need a twitter post to do it because your schizo rants are so identifiable.
You only keep talking about black and white people. You're not talking about racism involving South Americans or Arabs or Chinese or Aboriginals or Filipinos or Indians or anybody else. Your fancy theories are only relevant in the Western bubble, while the rest of the world and their experiences with race get ignored. CRT seems pretty damn Americentric and arrogant to me.
>South Americans
never seen racism towards them, aside from the general "dey took r jerbs" surrounding latinos >Arabs
post-9/11, yeah >Chinese
only since the pandemic, but I like them as a whole >Aboriginals
don't have those here >Filipinos
I don't think people could pick them out of a lineup, and my best friend is one >Indians
feather yes, dot no >really I have no problem with any of the listed except burger blacks
>CRT seems pretty damn Americentric and arrogant to me.
because it's about America.
Foreigners get fricking confused because they consume so much American media but they're suddenly appalled that Americans discuss America in their media.
Americans from whatever race see themselves AS that race IN AMERICA, they don't associate with, or relate with their "brethren" elsewhere except on a conceptual level. So whenever you see Americans discuss race, you need to be aware that it's from that context.
I've been interested with muscular bara men since I was a pre-teen kid. I was obsessed with watching cartoons like He-Man and Dragon Ball Z and really any cartoon with hot muscular men in it and also watched a lot of those infomercials for exercise machines that usually showed male fitness models and bodybuilders. I was also very into transformation scenes at the time (muscle growth, body possession, etc.) and fondly remember any episode of a show that had those kinds of scenes. Adam's transformation to He-Man in the 2000's cartoon was a huge one for me.
I never realized those things were even fetishes until I knew what that word was and what it meant. When I knew the meaning I was already in my senior high school years when we were taught actual sex ed (because my country was severely conservative). That was also the year that I finally realized I was gay and yes when I learned what masturbation was.
Yes, I remember being fascinated with naked dudes. I really liked seeing male butt shots in tv and movies. It was all pre-sexual awakening, I didn't even think I was gay.
How is this Freud? An early experience with fat ass and pussy could forge an arousing connection between ass, pussy and fatness. I’m saying this because I know someone who’s into fat b***hes and he said he distinctly remembers being first aroused before puberty by a fat babysitter who almost sat on him. I’ve also heard of a scatophile who developed the connection by, for secrecy purposes, only jerking off on the toilet after taking a shit
Kid ain't gay because he finds masculinity attractive. Most men find masculinity attractive and strive to achieve such for themselves(I.E. gymrats). Now if the kid had fantasized about being drilled in the butt by the Brawny Man, he would be gay. This is not portrayed by the comic and as such leaves the question open as to why the kid thought he was gay. Which brings us here to 4kun to ask the question everyone needs the answer to. >TL;DR yes this kid is a homosexual.
>Most men find masculinity attractive and strive to achieve such for themselves(I.E. gymrats).
Men get Cinemaphile to look good, feel good, and attract women or other gays. It's not that deep. >Now if the kid had fantasized about being drilled in the butt by the Brawny Man, he would be gay.
A kid wouldn't know about buttfricking yet, genius. He's a gay kid but still a kid.
If kids can be gay what's wrong with me being a pedo and loving straight little girls
It should be okay since I became a pedo while being a child myself, simply being attracted to the females of my own age and it just kinda never went away
Is being gay not a sexual orientation?
Can you "prefer" women but be gay by sexual orientation? What does it make you?
If kids can be gay they can also be straight. The same kid from OP pic could've been a girl who saw me changing in a pool locker when she accidently entered men's
>Classroom instruction by school personnel or third parties on sexual orientation or gender identity may not occur in kindergarten through grade 3 or in a manner that is not age appropriate or developmentally appropriate for students in accordance with state standards.
Take a wild guess what gets to be considered not "age appropriate", and who is making those decisions.
A bill doesn’t have to explicitly list that x, y and z is now banned, thanks to how the wording is left vague enough that it can be interpreted in any way you want. And when it’s left vague, anyone who is directly affected by the law has to go out of their way avoiding anything with even a slim chance of opening yourself to a lawsuit, thus making certain things de facto banned even though it’s not technically said so in the law. And that’s what conservatives want, to silence and intimidate people to shut down and cower.
The Don’t Say Gay bill also didn’t ban rainbows from classrooms but schools removed them anyway because you could interpret that to be something that will get you into trouble because it’s associated with pride and being gay.
Same way a woman with an ectopic pregnancy will be denied abortion because hey, you aren’t in danger right this minute so it’d be illegal to do an abortion. Come back to us when you’re already internally bleeding to death and your vital’s are crashing, that’s a situation where the hospital is legally protected from being sued for an illegal abortion because now it’s literally a life or death situation. But not a second earlier. That is how these laws work in practice. Hopefully you learned something.
Age appropriate has no one specific and clear way to interpret it. All you need is one zealot who thinks having a picture of your gay spouse is not appropriate to kids and you're fricked.
Florida already has thousands of teacher vacancies. This is literally leading to kids being less well educated due to not enough people being available to hold classes. But that's what conservatives want, gut the public sector so that they can prop up expensive private schools that most people won't afford and generally keep people stupid.
Nah, the LGB movement spent decades of work convincing people to tolerate their disgusting lifestyle by making it clear they weren't going after people's kids, only for TQ++ genderclowns to undo that work in a hilariously short amount of time by going exclusively and publicly after people's kids.
That scene in the Incredibles gave me a boner when Bob got covered in those black balls at a fast rate of fire, but it always grossed me out that it was him and not Helen
exactly what part of arithmetic requires you to tell your students about your homosexual sex life in your homosexual sham of a marriage, and why would you ever think anyone will ever tolerate that behavior?
I'm a teacher, kids love asking questions about my personal life. I don't say much but I have mentioned my wife before (I'm a dude); I don't see how that's any different than a teacher who is gay mentioning their partner.
Your whole country is a sitcom
Im so glad i dont live in it >n****r on supreme court wants to ban gay marriage but not interracial marriage
What a clown show
It's pretty fricked up that someome who describes themselves as "pansexual" was even allowed near kids in the first place, but it sounds like the bill is doing its job.
I've had 5 gay teachers in my HS career and none ever mentioned their partners or sex lives. What greek statue pfp twitter did you take this image from?
Probably because they were merely homosexuals, and not TQ+++ genderclown groomers.
Notice how none of your straight teachers talked about their sex lives either?
Because it's not normal to talk to your students about your sex life.
I had plenty of teachers who mentioned their spouses. I even met some. It's also vastly more likely if it's a teacher who runs your extracurriculars because you speak to them more casually much more often.
>It prohibits conversation about sexual orientation and gives parents the means to take schools to court if they suspect sexual orientation has been discussed in school.
So it doesn't mention gays at all, and everything you just said is a good thing. >WHAT IF THEY ASK ABOUT INAPPROPRIATE SUBJECTS?
Then just like everything other inappropriate question, you tell them to ask their parents, not the government employed tutor.
If you can't follow this simple rule, you should avoid schools before you get lynched.
Not telling kids about being gay just leads them to become rapists and pedos
My anecdotal evidence is proof >find out friend from childhood is gay >had a controlling parent >larped at being straight, "dating" a girl >hear from some other people that knew him that he diddled some littleboys >hes a middle school gym coach now
Because it's harder to empathize with others who are different than you (the core liberal social view) than it is to find things that a large part of America finds weird and tie your opponents to it.
Gays are accepted enough where (mostly) republicans can't straight up make them villains. God didn't light the country on fire and gay marriage being legalized didn't lead to them getting hit on as much as they'd hoped.
But trans people? They are yucky and America agrees, so lets make our social commentary all about a fraction of a percent of people who don't really bother anybody because it polls well.
America was founded by puritans who left england because they were too lenient on sodomites (nor publicly beheading them)
America is still a protestant puritan shithole, its taken them 250 years for anyone to even have the slightest liberal mindset and even then, american liberalism is lukewarm conservatism.
Also capitalism and big corpo running the country
A lot of the b***hing about grooming is about drag queens which is a gay thing and not a transgender thing and it's baffling how people are still conflating the two.
Getting a lot of 'they eat the poo poo' African preacher vibes from a good chunk of the posters here. Hicks with internet, probably think the pull out method and that one fifth grade sex ed video they watched is all they ever needed.
I mean, sex-ed for 12 yrs old probably isn't the best idea, but after puberty hits for basically everyone I don't see much of a problem, as long as it's objective and very careful and delicate with the subject of course.
I meant kids younger than 12 yrs, I forgot to put that part.
Puberty can start (in normal kids) at 8 (for girls) to 9 (boys)... for childhood obesity aka fatties? The new American health crisis has the added bonus of speeding up puberty (fat cells contribute to estrogen production) in girls, some as early as 5-6 now.
I mean, you heard about that 10 year old who had to go for an abortion recently right? She was 9 when she got pregnant.
I suppose you are right, I guess it's just kinda weird if you think about it.
>hold on lemme move the goalpost
My sexed class was in grade 7, when i was 11.
Kids born in november/december should be held back a grade imo. Everyone always felt 1 year older than me..
Anyway they just taught about the penis and the vegana, stds and condom use.
Its weird to be taught about foreskin and be the only one in class who has it
Puberty can start (in normal kids) at 8 (for girls) to 9 (boys)... for childhood obesity aka fatties? The new American health crisis has the added bonus of speeding up puberty (fat cells contribute to estrogen production) in girls, some as early as 5-6 now.
I mean, you heard about that 10 year old who had to go for an abortion recently right? She was 9 when she got pregnant.
I meant kids younger than 12 yrs, I forgot to put that part.
[...]
I suppose you are right, I guess it's just kinda weird if you think about it.
Germany has been teaching kids in school, elementary age/as young as five sex ed since 1992.
Biggest change they saw was teen pregnancies dropped, nothing else really came of it.
Germany also put orphans in the care of pedos to try and make sure they never became masculine enough to become Nazis. I don't think we want to use them as a standard for anything.
My mistake, it was from someone else's schizophrenia, carry on.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Did you check their sources? Because that shit happened.
2 years ago
Anonymous
They didn't post their sources under the video... but more importantly I'm not motivated to engage with shizos who have time to watch a video podcast catering to your culture wars bullshit put for by "the lotus eaters"
2 years ago
Anonymous
NTA
here's a source by simply google searching the video title
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helmut_Kentler
way to out yourself as a worthless moron though, filtered
2 years ago
Anonymous
[...]
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/07/26/the-german-experiment-that-placed-foster-children-with-pedophiles
It took like three seconds when you go to their website.
And it takes three seconds reading it to realize that while he had funding from the German senate, he did not disclose the nature of the study/fact he was putting these children in these homes until the statute of limitations had run out, and when it was revealed it caused major scandal/investigations because the German government was not cool with it. Rather than you know, an adequate response to a sanctioned widespread government mandated educational initiative that I put forward... you brought up one widely reviled professor acting outside his mandate.
So... going to stand by what I said before when I called you a schizo.
2 years ago
Anonymous
I stand by what I said Germany did it, perhaps without knowing but they still did it. Just like how they turned off their nuclear reactors and hopped on the Russian oil tit to go green or that they had a little Nazi problem. Germans are constantly terrible and no one should use them as a role model.
2 years ago
Anonymous
It was one rogue guy who knew what he did was evil. That's like saying America is a nation that pushes cannibalism because there are probably some that got away with it/weren't arrested.
You can keep trying to broaden the conversation, but I stand by what I said before, if your entire criticism of a successful social program is 'but what about that one guy who secretly did something illegal decades before it'... was that really your best angle of attack? Your best point?
So yeah, I stand by asking you to take your meds.
2 years ago
Anonymous
NTA
here's a source by simply google searching the video title
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helmut_Kentler
way to out yourself as a worthless moron though, filtered
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/07/26/the-german-experiment-that-placed-foster-children-with-pedophiles
It took like three seconds when you go to their website.
There's nothing in common with troony groomers and sex ed, and crossdressing homosexuals who think men cn get pregnant shouldn't be teaching sex ed either.
>on this board
WHY DO YOU homosexualS KEEP CONFUSING Cinemaphile FOR REAL LIFE? WHAT SCHOOL DOES THIS LOOK LIKE? WHAT CHURCH IS THIS? WHAT CHILDCARE PROFESIONALS ARE WORKING WITH KIDS HERE? THIS IS A PLACE FOR homosexualS, moronS, AND MANCHILDERN. YOU FRICKING JOGGGER.
I'm not the one confused to why a place for rejects and failures is not the same as a company, government, or school. I just have to shout it to you deaf nogs
>infant
the infant doesnt give a frick, he's just happy that everyone else is having a good time
also the blame is on the parents for thinking this is a good thing to bring a kid now >oy vey i had a kid my social life is over >or is it >brings baby to PG13+ movies, loud venues, wherever >YOU CANT BE MAD AT ME OR YOU'RE IN THE WRONG
If gays and trannies are exploiting a climate of sympathy to abuse children they learned it by taking notes from Christians
2 years ago
Anonymous
>i-it's your fault I'm a troony groomer!
haha, face the wall
2 years ago
Anonymous
Go ahead, Keith. Pull the fourth reich lever. You b***h cowards have been threatening it for 40 years. Stockpiles of weapons and the evangelicals basically owning half the government and your kids are still turning fricking queer.
Im actually proud of rufogay, usually by now he's crying about how jannies are trannies and are censoring him, but he's finally got his thread to himself.
Why can't people who write this stop being homosexuals?
being a homosexual is their entire personality
kids can't be gay
sounds like a challenge
Everybody go home, anon just cured grooming
damn and I'm a catholic too
found the israelite
sexuality is complex and essential to self awareness which human children arguably don't even have until maybe 2-3 years of age. If self awareness didn't exist they would have instincts, by observing animals and especially complex social fission fusion animal societies you have sexual behaviors by instinct and by cultural pressure (bonobos always 'present' to other bonobos divorced from need/desire to mate). On top of this humans carry a kind of virus which exists for itself at our expense: memes, language, memeplexes where memes form into essential interdependencies the biggest one being what Susan Blackmore called the 'selfplex'. This sits on top of our social pressures to perform all kinds of behavior (including sexual and definitely gendered such as little girls told to keep their play dresses clean and little boys expected to get dirty) plus our biological instincts which can rarely be homosexual as it happens in animals. This is a genetic strategy. If you pass down androphilia (the over sexual interest in males) to five daughters and one son you off set the lack of children from the son with more children from the daughters --same with gynophilia.
Most humans/social animals are most likely bisexual in some fashion instinctively. Culture pressures humans in the west to be heterosexual just as in ancient Rome they pressured most men to enjoy boys (if they genuinely wanted to or not) over women. There is an artificial pressure toward exclusive heterosexual pairing where the 'natural' human probably prefers bisexual polyamory.
But leaving all that aside over all our nature and rules of nature is SELF AWARENESS which overrides everything. A long lasting human tradition not found in any species is monasticism - life long chosen celibacy. Humans are not statistics, although there are certainly 'gay' kids, even this is a mindless semantic distinction that means little. Humans don't naturally get married in church, either.
Why do bigays insist everyone is like them?
most people are. The Kinsey scale might be flawed but is also pretty revealing. All people taken together are most likely a bell curve. But there are HUGE consequences to expressing your homosexual feelings, not only this there are tons of 'approved' ways to express it. Wresting other boys, sports in general, they're pretty much all excuses to touch other guys. Dressing up as a girl for Halloween 'harmless fun', it's everywhere in society just as we have this pressure to be flawlessly straight. This attitude is religious, sure, but all stems from a desire to convert (babies are easy to convert than fully grown brains that have a small amount of common sense) and have bigger armies than the other guy.
Most people go either way. If your culture punishes people who don't have kids or shames them if they pair up with the same gender you don't have to be draconian or totalitarian to get the results you want. You scare enough bisexual people into getting married under god and country to pump out little soldiers for you.
Society has no more need for endless flesh and blood soldiers anymore and suddenly now it's A-OK to be gay. In fact the elites are worried of over population and too many poors so they are actively trying to push culture into pro-gay and "gay people are better" neoliberal hegemony.
Actual homosexuals or bisexuals that don't want to be shamed (or even people who are mostly heterosexual but experimented in college and don't feel the need to be condemned for it) only want equal protection. They don't want to be the new authority. But that would be convenient for the mega elite that no longer need human workers/soldiers when they have robots and drones.
Why can't people just be straight/gay as well. Why do people have to be "secretly" so and so?
Also if most people went either way I feel like ex-gay therapy wouldn't be so hilariously ineffective
Even if sexuality is spectrum-like, why would an equal part of the population be inclined to non-reproductive sexual activities?
Wouldn't the fact that people who prefer reproductive sexual activities produce more people who prefer reproductive sexual activities, produce a heavy lean in that bell-curve toward heterosexuality?
Or are you suggesting that sexuality is genitically a blank-slate trait, and it gets set at some point in development?
But even then, there would still likely be some genetically affected traits that still could influence sexuality, and therefore produce a selective pressure toward heterosexuality.
Human civilization had no problems with men fricking men before the Abrahamic cults started showing up and pushing their ideologies on people and grooming their children to be in line with their beliefs.
>Grooming
Couldn't someone say this about gay/bi stuff?
If you can be convinced to suck wiener, chances are you never needed convincing in the first place.
My friends know I'm bi and we have conversations about it. They have a VERY distinct disgust reaction to 2 men having sex. there's no amount of grooming to remove that from a person, no matter what age. When boys hit puberty, they either developed that response or they don't. The ones that do are straight, and the ones who don't can be straight bi or gay. trans is mental Illness and isn't counted.
>trans is mental Illness and isn't counted
Ok transphobe
The only halfway-legitimate manifistation of it is gender dysphoria, and that is a mental illness.
Shut the frick up and go join the 41% you abomination.
You understand humans are one of a number of species that have sex for other purposes too, right?
Also, people who 'prefer reproductive sexual activities' are the ones who would be causing an increase in the incidence of gay boys, since it increases in likelihood with the number of brothers one has.
They could, but they would be lying, unlike anon.
>why would an equal part of the population be inclined to non-reproductive sexual activities?
Are you REALLY asking that question honestly?
I can see how the way I termed that can cause you're response.
What I mean is that heterosexual activities are in principle capable of reproduction. Homosexual activities are not.
I was about to go into more detail, but I think I mightve realized the answer.
My guess is that, all or most animals use homosexuality as a means of population control when a local group of species obtains extremely prosperous times. Perhaps some signal cascade causes some of them to become more bisexual or homosexual, and that slows down an eventual overpopulation event.
This feature could then provide the basis for bisexuality in species in general.
With humans specifically, when we obtained civilization, we reached fairly constant relatively higher prosperous state than the one we evolved in. This meant our sexual drive was higher than our reproductive need. And because contraception was fairly ineffective back then, that provided the impetus for people to set up homosexuality-based social structures, where sexual release was possible without reproductive risk.
From what I understand though, many of those homosexuality-based social structures were pretty morally-fricked though, frequently being pedophilic in nature.
Although heterosexuality-social structures were also morally-fricked too.
Perhaps the problem with modern times then, is that most of society is heterosexual and knows the monster of heterosexual pedophilia and fights it frequently. But we aren't as familiar with homosexual pedophilia, and it's not always clear to what degree homosexual people are also against homosexual pedophilia, because homosexuality is already so foreign to heterosexual people, it's not always easy to trust them at their word.
This is all just an attempt at explanation. I still generally think most gay people probably have baseline morality.
I think its more about modern standards of sexual maturity being higher aged, than anything historic being pedophilic. I don't know about you but I was ready to go at about 13-14.
Just be honest, homosexuality makes you uncomfortable, that's at least an explanation that makes sense and I understand. I don't need everyone to be into my lifestyle. All I expect is that my sexual habits not be interpreted as some sort of destructive pedophilic agenda.
>What I mean is that heterosexual activities are in principle capable of reproduction. Homosexual activities are not.
>Population control is my fringe-theory too
Thing is, there's some evidence that gays boost reproduction in a roundabout way
Being gay isn't good to pass on YOUR genes, but if you have a gay sibling your kids would be the best chance for them to pass their genes on, plus they'll (probably) be emotionally invested in them so... win-win for you, or at least it should be on average
It might also go some way to explain why the chance someone is gay rises when they're born later in the mother's life and the further away they are from being the first child
People like to frick. People get bored of one type of frick, so they look for new kind. People get bored at different rates. It really all comes back to boredom. Same reason so many fat asses exist.
well it's pretty mysterious, we have a couple of huge blind spots. We can compare ourselves to monkeys but monkeys are complex social animals and even with them it's not concrete. We examine them looking to reinforce our biases, even our unconscious ones. We want things to make sense but we are biological creatures dependent on random mutations, sexual preferences (which do weird things like create peawieners and other royally fricked species) then pack cultures and then fission-fusion societies, and a singular example (ourselves) of a lingual self-aware metacognitive 'society?' that seems to favor our IDEAS more than our bodies/lives. Humans go through life scrubbing their own history, calling themselves supernatural demi-gods or the sons of sea monsters, declare themselves heaven mandated Kings (after they act like bandits for a few years) and desperately seek a form of immortality through legacy and monuments that depict a sanitized and 'unreal' form of the pathetically mortal, diseased, old, delusional warmonger.
What's important to understand that sex itself is an IDEA that dominates us. We are slaves to our ideas. Unless we can think THROUGH them, we are slaves OF them. Sexuality isn't a spectrum it's a set of behaviors that animals perform that we identify with and then FORCE into paradigms that are useful to our memetic systems-- systems that only exist to perpetuate the systems. Kings do not become immortal, they merely force development of concepts and industries like stonecutting, art, memes. The more you think about sexuality the more your reach an apex of philosophy and psychology that reveals everything is a con-job. Society is the moment when the self-concept escapes the flesh. We do what we do and are manipulated into doing whatever, based on whatever will benefit the same moronic 'kings' (power elite) that think they're building immortal pyramids for themselves. But in the end its all for the virus.
Population control is my fringe-theory too, especially given how many gay whites and israelites there are. But besides microplastics and cow hormones I also subscribe to the notion that gays promote strong same-sex bonds, the good ol' bros before hoes, except permanently without a hoe. Can't quite remember the details but it's easy to imagine how someone immune to the manipulative charms of The Female can be a rock that grounds everyone else, much like how left handedness has its own widely accepted niche in social interactions.
Also really like
's point. It's very unique and I've never heard it before but it brings up an interesting point. I used to be "straight" because I'd give flowers to girls and want to hold their hands, so I do think kids are impressionable since the only reason I had to do what I did was because I was imitating movies and shit and can see why conservative parents would be concerned over seeing kids acting gay. But like you said, that's being framed through the view of childhood innocence, which only became a thing in the late 1800s to combat child labor. The idea that there is something to corrupt in kids is a modern notion that stems from that era to rebuke a specific problem. Childhood isn't as innocent as our modern sensibilities make it out to be. Kids are naturally dumb and can't understand or communicate their feelings. They are just as likely to change their sexuality as they do their favorite color, and seeing them exhibit certain traits on the outside doesn't necessarily change what they feel on the inside.
There are more gay [insert minority] here. Most of them are just on the DL because their culture makes it hard for them to be out.
One of my favorite things about LGBT debate is that everyone has their own little theory and constantly fight each other about it
>Gays were molested
>Born this way
>the "everyone is bi" anon
>Bis don't exist and are in denial
>Being OP
Are there any other theories I'm missing?
>being gay is a problem because if we made it alright to be gay, everyone would just be gay
>I mean, everyone knows how awesome it would be to frick someone of their own gender and be in a relationship with them because of how disgusting and ridiculous the opposite gender is
>this is something we all think
>but we need to keep a lid on these instincts and desires that literally everyone has for the good of society
Oi wtf.
source?
"gay" and "straight" are cultural artefacts that are packaged and sold to people as ideology. Cletus sucks dick behind the gas station on Tuesday but joins his brothers in beating down queers (any man wearing a shirt) on weekends and he sees no problem or contradiction. He has a hunting buddy where instead of hunting they frick but he also has a wife and kid and his aforementioned homophobic brothers that he commits insurance fraud with and sells meth for. This is how it used to be, too. People would frick and not think about it being attached to their identity.
When I say most people are bisexual I don't mean it in the sexual identity politics sense. People frick. If stuck on an island with someone of the same gender, 'straight' people frick. It's a big thing in prisons, on boats as enlisted men, at camp far away from home, and so on. Corporations and government wants to codify and 'own' human experience so they define, reduce, and accuse people of things they used to ignore. Gay guys used to hide from their wives and kids on weekends and go to bath houses and clubs to suck dick or get fricked. Suddenly, out of the fricking blue, the police started sting operations where they had cops get blowjobs and then arrest the ones doing it. Taxes paid for this shit. An anti-gay hysteria swept the nation and the west and hasn't really settled down. But those married men who liked to jam it in young boys on weekends NEVER thought of themselves as 'gay' or even unusual. All their friends did it. If you look at human history and their actual behaviors, most people swing both ways. They simply don't talk about it or don't think it's not manly and Christian and American or whatever.
You care about this false dichotomy (gay straight) because it's convenient to manipulate you with and you're a fricking simp for the power elite.
Ok.
Still rather not frick both
It's a bell curve, plus culture that pressures people in 'heteronormative' directions. So most people are bisexual (for lack of a better word) but pressured to be straight to the point where there are probably lots of people left of center who are 'more' gay than bisexual who cling on hard to that little amount of heterosexual feelings they have in order to not be pilloried, hated, disowned, told they're going to hell, etc. There is obviously an uncomfortable line where people who are MOSTLY gay but can force themselves to be 'normal' struggle. That's not the middle of the bell curve, though. While most humans (minus culture) might be equally interested in fricking men and women who are young and healthy, we live in a culture that makes them incredibly uncomfortable about their feelings for the same gender but they're comfortable enough ignoring or sublimating that with football and wrestling or the occasional drunken kiss or wienersucking they swear up and down never happened. Much like in ancient Rome there were men who were MOSTLY straight who probably felt incredibly uncomfortable being socially and culturally pressured to have sex with young boys. They did it anyway like your average closet case does today. Society 'works' for most of us. Most humans throughout time were pressured to prefer one gender despite our natural tendency not to prefer either. Ancient Greeks were no picnic for the mostly straight humans just like today under Western Imperialism it's no picnic for mostly gay people.
But people who aren't in the middle (mostly gay or mostly straight) are a minority and will always feel the yoke more than the majority.
Ok.
anon if you genuinely think this is reflective of reality...
you're out of your fricking mind.
He didn't write anything particularly controversial though.
mindless people will always mindlessly defend cultural hegemony even when they suffer the most.
People are not 'gay' or 'straight', it's too simple of an idiotic reduction for a self aware, socially complex, animal. Animals that have instincts, subject to fission-fusion social dynamics which co-evolve with the constantly evolving instincts, and then on top of all that an unprecedented metacognition not found anywhere else in the known galaxy where the individual animal subject to the most complex social animal dynamics can also think for themselves and choose their own behaviors beyond social pressure and animal instincts.
But no. We all must be 'gay' (tm, copyright by Disney corp) or 'straight' (as dictated by the holy Bible where God will strike you down if you dare spill your seed outside a woman's vegana for purposes of procreation like he did in Genesis 38). Never mind that humans throughout history have a long tradition of being celibate for spiritual purposes.
Idk man, I like the cervix. I can’t get it if partner don’t have one. Its impossible.
Gay thoughts are same as killing baby & Intrusive thoughts.
it's not like people who are 'mostly straight' don't exist, they're simply not the majority.
Culture not only wants all men (they ignore lesbians for the most part) to get married and have kids they condemn lots of innocuous sexual behavior that has nothing to do with gay/straight. Wanting to do your wife in the butt is also abnormal and sinful. Only procreation. It's not actually about how you feel about people's bodies it's a mandate where you are indoctrinated to serve a social role. Lesbian little girls STILL dress up in wedding dresses, and want to be princesses. It's not about sex, it's about emulating mom/dad and eventually fulfilling a purpose to bring more warm bodies into the credit system. More people means more debt, more mortgages, student loans, life insurance, health insurance, and keeps the power elite happy.
If anyone gives a frick about people's actual sexualities and freedoms to express that it's the LGBT community which pits itself AGAINST the culture hegemony. What do you do if you're a Sadist man who has a Masochist wife and you both enjoy BSDM sex? Well its not very Christian, is it? But what if you're not Christian and you don't want to be in the closet and you want to be respected as a human being instead of being told you are sinful and un-American? What if you have a foot fetish and your wife likes it? Well, guess what, that's not acceptable either. In fact. Sex itself is not acceptable. Politicians don't discuss what they do with their creepy Stepford wives, do they?
Heterosexuality as a practice is also verboten if you examine any typical heterosexual couple's actual behaviors you bet most of it would get them publicly shamed or demonized. Because it's not about sex it's about social performance. Get married, have kids. Your role now is raising kids for the power elite. Your sexuality is only a joke on insipid late night talk shows. You only think you're not repressed and abused because they abuse other people more.
Why are you writing multiple paragraphs at anons who say they just like one gender/sex?
I think I'm starting to partly understand why bi-erasure is a thing now.
I still don't understand why people just can't "live and let live" when it comes to LGB. It feels like everyone wants to dictate other's sexuality. If someone wants to be bi/attracted to both, fine. If they want/feel attracted to only one sex, fine. The whole "no one is bi"/ "everyone is bi" thing gets annoying.
>I still don't understand why people just can't "live and let live" when it comes to LGB. It feels like everyone wants to dictate other's sexuality. If someone wants to be bi/attracted to both, fine. If they want/feel attracted to only one sex, fine. The whole "no one is bi"/ "everyone is bi" thing gets annoying.
Because people are desperate for power and approval. Shit, the neogender crowd want the power to order you to emotionally validate them, no matter what you really think. They don't even want people to agree with them, they just want the symbolic ritual of approval.
Where did that anti-gay hysteria come from?
Y'know, if everybody is secretly okay with doing gay shit.
If Christians had wanted to be okay with gay people they could've done it a long time ago, the parts of the Bible that are against gay stuff could be easily ignored or re-interpreted. They do that with plenty of the other commandments.
>could be re-interpreted
They already were to create the excuse for bigotry you're pretending to have. Any actual bible scholar can tell you that.
Okay, so what made them want to interpret it that way.
My core question is:
If everybody is secretly fine with homosexuality or bisexuality, why is it so frequently scorned in the open?
I'm not really all that against homosexuality, my self. As a straight guy, I have the standard response of gay guys > gross, gay girls > hot.
But I acknowledge internally that finding gay guys gross isn't a good reason for looking down upon them or making them illegal.
Because people's interpretation of the bible and tradition means it's a hammer to deal with any loose nails. It's about control.
It would depend on what them you're talking about, because biblical reinterpretation has existed pretty much from the start. Usually the answer is simply enforcing a power structure to suit the people with an interest in control. The bible produces, among other things, a number of useful scapegoats, which all authorities love having available.
As for the frequency point, keep in mind we're looking at things from the perspective of a society that's already been immersed in particular semi-global narratives for longer than anyone's been alive. It's very easy to maintain certain moral bugbears when the peasants think their religion is natural and not an invention of the clergy to dominate their followers and extract money.
Anything you're reading form teh bible has been passed through protestant English translations.
That being said, Jesus Christ our Lord never said anything about homosexuality being unacceptable. You're not going to convince me that a man who associated with lepers would have a problem with gays.
Whats worse, a man loving another man, or a debilitating contagious disease that makes your fricking skin fall off?
what is a soul to you?
We are all the same soul who lack the perspective to understand that we are all the perfect creation of God existing simultaneously. We're both the same person, everyone is.
Heaven is harmony within that one soul
Hell is the understanding of how much you've hurt yourself.
your formatting is way too formal for a shitposting federal honeypot.
I just like sucking wiener dude I don't know what you want from me.
suck wiener a little less formally.
No
>Jesus Christ our Lord never said anything about homosexuality being unacceptable
This. I love that dude.
Jesus is inside you
Everyone is not ok with it, the frick are you talking about? It’s disgusting, and humans literally kill each other over less.
It came from their own obnoxious ungrateful behavior of forcing their sexual preferences into every facet of society, beyond what even straight people do, also record grooming and STDs
That's definitely a recent phenomenon that's making it a bit harder to maintain my gay-guys-are-ok-despite-being-gross position.
But it's possible that this phenomenon is being manufactured by forces outside gay people's control.
Also I'm not sure how present this phenomenon was in the past.
>it's possible this convenient right-wing meme to poorly excuse bigotry is being manufactured
impossible
There were several documented events recently of men in drag displaying themselves or otherwise being inappropriate to children.
That shits disturbing, and until the gay community untethers themselves from the movement supporting this shit, it reflects badly on them too.
>rightoid talking points they cooked up after making trannies their target following the loss of gay marriage as a viable culture war issue
>won't someone PLEEEEEASE think of the children
wow how compelling
I am thinking of the children.
oh my
>think of the children
Why does everyone always blame the Christian’s ?
unironically pedophiles changed some of the bible to say gay instead of pedophile. look it up.
>the parts of the Bible that are against gay stuff
Is there anything like that tho?
God never said to hate gays.
Men who lie with men as they would a woman
This wasnt a warning against homosexuality, it wasa prophecy about FTMs and axe wounds,
Truly abominable
>sees no problem or contradiction
This Cletus you're talking about of course sees a problem as he is always keeping his fricking a secret and thinking about fuxking when he's at home with his family. It's a hyperminority of men that are interested in sucking wiener. That's just you
Nooooo I don't wanna fap to Bob!
Yes.
Yes you do
Fap to Teddy too
>Bis don't exist and are in denial
Dunno about this. I enjoy sex both with woman and man.
But I will never be sure if I would miss wiener on the long run.
I was just listing all the pointless debate/arguments. You're cool.
That said, I do believe that being OP is the root cause of homosex.
Yeah I know that you just listed this things. I hear this everytime and I will never understand why are ppl mad about bis.
Thank you Anon.
Frick you bis are just bored straights. All they do is break gay hearts because inevitably they decided they have to frick a b***h to 'continue' their legacy.
As if anything matters once our galaxy gets pushed over the universal waterfall and we all become meaningless information until the next big bang
>On top of this humans carry a kind of virus which exists for itself at our expense: memes, language
Shut up, Kojima
Man, that dog must be so happy.
I wish I could experience that sort of simple joy.
Yeah, that's pretty much what I suspect as well. I wouldn't call myself 'bi', but I could see the process by which I've become attracted some rather revolting women, also working on men. I don't really want to know.
The conclusion of this post, btw, is that you can indeed pressure children to become gay.
If you can't get a boner you cant be gay thinking otherwise makes you a pedophile
I'm 25 and I had an incredibly obvious gay classmate when I was in the 2nd grade. We'd call him a homosexual.
What kind of backwards hillbilly shithole do you live in where second graders have already been taught how to hate? Usually that shit starts in like middle school
Children are naturally hateful and mean, they have to be taught not to be
moron
work work work work work
I discovered I was bisexual at 12 years old after accidentally finding gay zelda porn on the internet
Didn't help that Death Note was new around the time and L was hot as frick
Wait, was Zelda gay or Link?
This is important.
Obviously I mean Link.
Specifically the Ocarina of Time verison since that was the recognizable one at the time. Twilight Princess wasn't even out yet.
I specifically remember browsing the internet and stumbling on art of Link getting fricked in the ass and being confused and aroused and angry.
I wish I didn't find anime when I was 11. It all just spiraled downwards from there.
>pic related awoken my love for hot men and cute boys.
Many such cases. Personally I wasn't a little b***h boy homosexual so I just tried to emulate what I saw as strong characters
Yeah I was
True I forgot gays dont get the homosexual update until age 13
If you didn't get this that means you're an outdated model
Tell that to the 5 year old me getting weird feelings for every muscular cartoon man in the 90s.
Same
Jorgen from Fairy odd parents, I wanted to see him naked
There was that one episode where he was down to his undies. Definitely solidified any doubts I had about me.
I remember that
Also Johnny Bravo bouncing his big chest did not help
We could go on forever. The 90s/early 2000s was packed with huge cartoon men. Modern cartoons can't even compete.
The things I want Zeus to do
Had a crush on a boy as early as second grade before sex was even a thing to me
I was gay for King Koopa
then kids can't be straight either :^)
I knew I was straight when I was 11, why wouldn't it be possible with homosexuals?
I knew I was a fatgay when I was 6, so I don't see why a gaygay couldn't have figured it out by then.
Yeah you knew because someone old hag sat on you didn’t she
Nah, my grandpa bought me a VHS set with 100 of the "greatest" (too old to be expensive to repackage) cartoons so I could watch it in on 8 inch tv built into his car during road trips. One of them was the Betty Boop cartoon that ends with her laughing at how successful her diet was and inexplicably fattening up. It was immediately my favorite for reasons I couldn't explain.
Haha excellent
Nice bait.
I remember feeling very guilty but secretly happy shopping for underwear when I was a kid (like 7 or so?) just staring at bulges while I tried to hide me looking from mother.
Never molested, had both parents, great male role models. Never found out what gay was till middle school, when it clicked.
Based, look at all the groomers you triggered
that was the aim
Why did this get so many (you)s? Are you guys this board and/or butthurt?
I'm not gay so i cant be butthurt
checkmate
Tell that to all the straight guys (they tell me so) I see in the ED who 'fell on' random shit we have to take out.
straight fragility is a thing. being gay makes you 'less of a man' and touching your pooper makes you gay.
I've seen (largely) amerimutts, defending that they don't use a bidet because water touching your butthole would turn them gay and damn them to an eternity in hell.
most I've ever gotten and now I know how to get them
Getting twitter clout just takes taking a dildo up the ass, or at least pretending to.
This is like the 4th comic he's made with this exact same joke.
What are the other 2?
defnitely
>groomer the comic
I like he's depiction of Emily, shame what's happening to her here.
Oh boy, my fetish
My mind telling me no
but my body...
My fricking sides.
Isn't made by the same guy that did Loss?
No.
In his defense, I mean...
It looks like plastic. I bet you're one shallow bastard.
What exactly was the point of giving the Robin suit nipples?
I like when he wears the shiny lip gloss.
Yeah.
Joel knew what he was doing
Saw him on a golf course in Illinois, once, during the summer this movie came out. He had such a defeated look on his face.
>batman and robin was directed by Joel Schumacher
>Schumacher described himself as "extremely promiscuous", saying in a 2019 interview that he became sexually active at age eleven, and estimating that he had sex with between 10,000 and 20,000 men over the course of his life.
hmmm
But that film had both Alicia Silverstone and Uma Thurman in it. Batman Forever was by far the gayer film.
That movie is a marvel for being the only time Uma was ever attractive. It's like how Cameron Diaz is only ever frickable in The Mask.
I didn't realize how much the New 52 Nightwing costume owed to this outfit.
God I hate comics like these, and not just the ones made by this homosexual
wow we get it, random commonplace things not meant to be sexualized turned you gay
very funny and relatable, thank you for letting us know 50 times
Do...you think Batman and Robin wasn't meant to turn you on? It's only redeeming factor is how horny it is.
It's this guy's version of the "lol, brain reminds me of an unrelated awkward situation when I finally enjoy myself/am going to bed"
>Yes, using a paper towel is worst for the environment than a reusable wet towel, but boy are we socially conscious!
I put that with all the brands suddenly gloating about "responsible" farming a few years ago. And what have you been doing for the past 60 years? Being irresponsible little shits?
>Yeah, but now I've come clean.
And you'll get nothing from me but a laugh.
aren't all his jokes about him being gay?
What the frick happened in 1970?
Hanna Barbera
Nah that's UPI
UPA I mean. Doy
Someone discovered the best art style
He got a side gig on Schoolhouse Rock
Rosebud's frozen peas.
Full of country goodness and green pea-ness...
>"Hey, that book The Giving Tree is selling real well, what if we just blatantly copy its artstyle?"
It's called SOUL
Acid
Hippies.
70's equivalent of picrel
They were probably trying to make the design more kid friendly
Please don't tell me the big green giant turns you on...
GIANT GREEN PEA NESS
There's actually porn of Green Giant.
There’s porn of everything
I'm trying to imagine the story told by this sequence.
A happy dude, enjoying the white skin and green pea-ness of his life. This goes awry, leading him to become green himself, drowning him in a maudlin existence.
Then, he discovers corn and shit's great again. Then he gets a girl who is willing to get murdered by him and he is psychotically ecstatic. After murdering four women he's feeling pretty good. This leads him to be enjoy peas for their inherent pea-ness. But he doesn't forget his love of corn.
In the 60s he realized his hatred of women stemmed from his latent homosexuality and is happy as a bear. Then he gives being a bottom a try for a while. Finally he just enjoys hanging out, free as a bird.
He got cold for awhile and so murdered an anime character for his scarf. Finally, leading him to being the confidant beast we have today.
>A happy dude, enjoying the white skin and green pea-ness of his life.
Now he's an even happier dude, enjoying the white cum and green penis in his life.
I don't know why I just made this
spiff
Mango is ebin
The shoes weird me out for some reason.
I like what they were going for with the scarf, nice contrast, but it didn't quite match the design, like why give him a scarf when he's wearing a toga? He clearly doesn't care about the cold. I'd have given him gloves or a hood or something. Anyway I love the colors on 2014 also.
I feel like the correct play would be to give him some kind of sash, maybe flower themed
>caveman goku was the original mascot
>mfw my Giants win the Eries
45, 60, or 70s please.
Ideal ship
>tags: size_difference, stomach_bulge, large_insertion, impossible_fit, cum_inflation, all_the_way_through, vanilla, handholding
A spikey boy ahead of his time.
I always thought he was hot
He’s hardly gay
the frick happened in 1970, he looks like a children's cartoon character
Looks like a venture bros characters
Green Giant knows how to treat a lady, "HO! HO! HO!"
70's version may have been to get more kids to eat veggies? I wonder if that artist did other mascots for the company?
1928
>soul
1930
>souless
1936
>soulful
1945
>soulful
1948
>souless
1950
>soul
1955
>soulful
1960
>soul
1970
>soul half souless half
1976
>soulful
1980
>soul
2014
>soul
Porn When?
what came out of that time he was gonna sue that indie film crew for stealing his idea?
so the punchline is he became gay as a child? how disturbing also
>single mom
ah, makes sense
moms boyfriend raped him not really very funny joke imo
Anon just because someone has a single mom doesn’t mean they’ll turn out gay (I.e. myself)
i don't know man you read like someone who swallows a million wieners per day
only one i woulden't outright go with 'gay' since i knew alot of boys that got dragged into watching it and getting there own sailor waifu's back in the day.
Mercury is bae.
>not picking jupiter
homosexuals all of you
jupiter is best girl!
Mars.
Didn't Brawny Guy used to have a beard?
Mars, then Jupiter then the rest I'm just sort of indifferent to.
>Mars
Patrician choice
What about Neptune and Venus?
Venus is too high maintenance, Jupiter is a good time gal, she'd be up for it, but you'd just be added to the collection of exes.
This isn't gay, this is a kid just replicating something cool he saw.
But cartoon girl did it so only a gay boy would do it I guess
I do wanna frick the mom yes
Same.
>man stubbornly refuses to drink water to prove point, dies of dehydration
He should have drawn himself as a kid for this one so it doesn’t look like a fricking 30 year old begging his mommy to fix his tummy ache
Considering how much jaundice he's displaying in the third panel, yes, he should have drank water.
Again why is this adult asking for mommy’s help with a tummy ache?
Well she's already there and depending on how bad is your condition, if you could just take five while a more able adult carries you to help, or maybe provide help themselves, would be appreciated.
He should have listened rather than fetching pokemon creatures.
We all had guilty pleasures. Some, it was Sailor Moon, others it was Powerpuff Girls.
Powerpuff girls isn't anything like a magical girl manga/anime. If you were going to say Sailor Moon, the other should have been something like winx club or WITCH.
PPG wasn't specifically made for girls
For me it was Totally Spies.
I wasn't even aware of the fetish shit as a kid, I just legitimately thought it was cool.
I was kinda ashamed to watch it cuz it was a girl's show, though.
Britney needed more episodes.
>We all had guilty pleasures.
I hate to tell you this, but if you felt guilty about it, you were weak.
Sailor Moon was fricking awesome and was extremely high action compared to other crap on at the time. You'd be a huge loser kid to not play Sailor Moon. Mars > Mercury, he does have homosexual tastes though.
The biggest problem here is that his favorite scout is Mercury. It should be Jupiter.
You see, only a poser would have anyone but Venus as their best girl.
I mean plenty of kids pretend to have powers controlling Water and replicating cool moves they saw on tv it’s not an indicator of anything Gay
Well at least he has good taste in Sailor Scouts
i just realize im in Cinemaphile. with shitty gay posts like this one i thought this was Cinemaphile
What was the earliest age that you felt sexual attraction?
I can relate because I got my first rock hard boner watching the 2003 Hulk movie as a 5 y/o, all the scenes of Bruce transforming into Hulk turned me on before I even knew what that meant.
>play FFXI
>life ruined forever.
What's this?
From a short 5 page Becky Prim comic Karl Hadrika did.
I think it was like 5 years ago or something when this same dude did his 'what I do during summer' comic and it was him posing like a homosexual while drinking some fru fru tropical fruit alcoholic smoothie at the beach like some kind of prancing la la homosexual man.
So he's probably gay.
Those tropical wienertails can frick you up way faster than any beer. They're loaded with booze.
It's weird that adults now say it's wrong for kids to early on feel sexual attraction towards stuff, especially on
/co/. Not to say kids aren't impressionable and won't be talked into believing they're gay. I remember being a wee lad going to see Tokyo Drift with my dad and realizing asian girls made me horny. I think it's just natural kids have reactions like that they just don't know what it means or can't put it into words.
Posting on Cinemaphile amplifies this, but people have trouble adjusting their perspective to how their brain used to work. We always make the joke on here that cartoonists were making their fetish and kids get corrupted... but mostly that's probably just retroactive thinking. We get exposed to tons of shit, and baseline humans tend to form fetishes... so if it wasnt over the muscle growth or something you didn't really do much on when you first saw it, it'd be for the funny nose you saw on the one beautiful lady two tribes over or whatever.
Most people who saw Lola Bunny didnt become furries. Most people who saw He Man and Skeletor going at it didn't become gay.
Most people are straight, some people are fully gay. Very few people were on the precipice until they saw a burly lumberjack paper towel mascot
It might be worth noting that things like the Brawny mascot or Batman and Robin being gay awakenings are staple gay in-jokes too. A gay audience isn't going to question the plausibility.
Was Batman and Robin the one where they had Batman's ass pressed against the screen and ice age killed the dinosaur or no?
Sounds about right. There were a lot of campy jokes and loving shots of the male actors. The Chris O'Donnell Robin was a notable dreamboat.
I think some people are aware of what your talking about. Their aware that seeing certain things in certain contexts can produce a permanent rewiring of their mind. And if that rewiring causes them to have unnatural or immoral preferences, then that event will be undesirable.
So if, as an adult, they see shit similar to what they saw get directed at kids, it's understandable for them to be upset.
That's not what he's talking about.
He was talking about media causing kid's to make realizations about themselves.
The thing is, kids are so malleable at that point that they could, at different points in their development, discover different contradictory things about themselves.
So the realization they're making is more like a fleeting thought that gets turned into a near-permanent attribute by the implication of acceptance by an authority figure (whatever media it is that they are consuming).
I believe he's talking about realizing something more fundamental about yourself, not having a stray thought that Bat-butt is sexy because Schumacher blasted a 40-foot picture of one at you. They are potentially similar in the cause but not in how they feel.
It is true to an extent that kids sometimes at different points realize contradictory things, but usually that's because kids will assume they're 'normal' and not consider something like bisexuality until later. Starting with the assumption that you're gay is possible but a weird leap for any kid to make. Note that the jokes in the comic start with an implicit assumption of heterosexuality being upended by something. The kid already knows what gay and straight are but hadn't considered himself gay before.
If looking a women could make you straight a young age, no one would ever be gay. I remember seeing stripperilla as a kid and getting nothing out of unless a guy was there to make a dick joke.
I'm really more focusing on weird fetishes than homo/heterosexuality.
I'm willing to believe that that sexuality can come from something deeper.
At the same time, I wouldn't entirely rule out the possibility that circumstances could have a heavy impact on sexual orientation.
So which uncle sexually abused you?
I mean, why did they make him so hot?
To give housewives something to fantasize about.
I remember this happening but not the reception. But I totally would.
Brawny? More like SCRAWNY am I right?
>didn't make the girl brawny as frick
YOU HAD ONE JOB BRAWNY, TO BE BRAWNY
AND YOU FRICKING FAILED IT
I bet corporations are glad they don't have to do go through all the effort of becoming green or whatever anymore and they can just change some branding to make the left happy. Probably saves them tons of money.
>strong, masculine full sheets
> weak feminine half sheets
Appropriate
uncle got you early eh?
>kids can't be gay
>I was gay when I was a kid
>that doesn't count because you obviously were molested!
damn the denial is strong in you morons
its simple cause and effect
Gay AND a manlet.
I don't know the exact history of KKK and blacks, so I can't talk about that.
But the shit the lgbtq community is doing nowadays is disturbing. I want to believe the lgb portion of the community is separate from them, and lgbtq is just using the lgb to maintain credibility. They seem to have a pattern of taking terms from other more credible-looking marginalized-group's movements.
Sexuality is not essential. Sex is not essential to your existence. This whole fricking ideology rests upon the flimsy notion that sex is somewhat necessary in our day to day live. No. People need to wake up, but they don't want to.
The pizza guy was pretty hot.
Thread needs a bit more homolust.
Goofy does have a pretty nice ass there.
I will lay out my generalizations on the internet and there is nothing you can do to stop me. Go outside if you want to be productive.
Wasn't this the comic artist who had a comic idea stolen by short-film-makers?
But then it turns out he stole a comic idea from somebody else.
But ge doubled down by editing his comic archive to make it look like his version was older, but it didn't match the InternetArchive cache.
So he is a thief that tried to frame the original artist as a thief.
Was raped and groomed as a kid.
Something vad happened that I can't fully remember but makes me feel real fricked up
Now I'm pan, hypersexual, have a terrible sexual compulsion problem and will have dangerous sex with almost anyone if there is no possibility of there being a relationship or actual closeness.
Just had god awful sex an hour ago with a gross person I don't even know
fricked the dog shit out of them nutted washed my dick in the sink and left without saying a word
tried to kill myself in the post sex suicidal depressive haze on the drive back home
I actually honestly hate sex to be honest and will go back on libido killing amounts of steroids.
Problem. is that I become attractive and a textbook stud when I do that.
Can painkillers kill off sexual urges?
Anti-depressants and smoking marijuana cause low libido.
Sleeping less and over drinking alcohol are the unhealthier options.
>your sexuality was created by advertising firms
lmao
What in the frick even is this thread?
An entrance to the nightmare dimension
/co/. you're on Cinemaphile.
post 2015 Cinemaphile.
post steven universe Cinemaphile.
post she-ra Cinemaphile.
post owl house Cinemaphile.
the director himself was gay
>U R GEY!
>NUH UH!
Yeah, what I find horrible about our current reality, is that it seems those frickers can pretty much play with our fricking society like putty in their hands.
Like, what kind of sick shit will they do next? Do we have any control over it at all?
I find the people doing their work disgusting, but, yeah, that almost makes me complicit, since my reaction of anger and disgust is part of their designs.
And it's difficult to know what we can do or should do to stop them, since it's not outside of the possibility that it's practically impossible.
And all we can really hope for is some sort of black swan event to topple their order.
How many variations of this scenario has he made now?
what a shitty art style.
It's weird that he's still better looking than his comic version.
Dude is legit handsome.
There are two types of self-insert artists.
Those who draw themselves as ugly, average, or as basic as what they actually look like in real life.
Or, those who draw themselves as supermodels only.
oooh I'm a lumberjack and I'm OK
After reading this thread i understand why this place was Cinemaphilenfirmed as the gay/troony board
no shit Black person
Why are the necks so thin?
It's an older strip. His necks get thicker over time.
I had this girl come out as a demisexual recently, and I’m just glad I didn’t put the energy into banging her, as it would’ve taken years.
In the new brawny commercials his jeans are too baggy and you can't even see his buttcheeks as he walks away. They nerfed him because he was too sexy and don't even show his face
I'm not even 100% certain what CRT is.
If it's just teaching people about race, then sure it's fine.
If it's teaching white kids that they've inherited sin, and owe other races, then it's pretty fricking garbage.
I'm not sure which of those things are true.
>entire basis of Christianity often includes the concept of inherited sin
CRT is just about pointing out that it's super easy to show that just because legally you can't say "no blacks allowed" anymore, there still are plenty of laws/social constructs out there that have a similar effect.
Basically, don't feel guilty for being white... but maybe feel some guilt if you bought into talking points about how the wealthy part of your city (that got that way due to snapping up federal housing stuff/GI bill benefits preferentially for whites and has HOAs that previously barred blacks) deserves to become it's own district and not pay taxes into funding the black... I mean "intercity" schools or whatever.
and because they insist making it about race and not class, they'll always stay slaves... sorry, "temporary embarrassed billionaires"
This description is clearly an ideology, not a field of study. This is not about facts, it is about politicized interpretation of facts and assumptions based on those interpretations and then making broad sweeping assumptions based on those already assumed interpretations.
This is science or history. Its not even objective enough to be philosophy. This ideology, and frankly does seem inappropriate to teach as fact to young children alongside chemistry and biology.
>random cropped screencap of text
conservatives are the dimmest most gullible people alive
the worst part is this is how conservatives operate off of Cinemaphile too
you're all actually this stupid everywhere
thats cool
have you decided whether or not CRT exists or not yet, or whether its only taught in law school, or whether its just basic history?
you already lost this fight two years ago, but don't let me stop you from continuing to aimlessly flail around
>twittersceenshot
honestly just kys instead of proving how stupid rightoid 'academics' are
I do see how institutions can be racist, but at this point the cause and affect of racial differences has looped around so many times it's hard to know what's innate.
At this point in time, there is a difference between black and white people in America. I'm of the opinion, that it probably is caused by an accumulation of the shitty treatment are elites have caused to befall black people.
This results in them being more prone to violence and crime, which in turn, cause white people who wouldn't otherwise be racist against them, to become racist against them.
It's just another way that the elites has molded our society against us all.
What would be wrong with sending them back to Africa at that point in time (1870)? Especially when America had been nothing but hell for them up to that point? Why would they want to continue living near people who hated them so much and viewed them as subhuman?
>board with the most trannies has the most pedophile groomers
makes you think
this isnt lgbt ?
no, they're second, all the trannies come here to spam troony universe threads
Look at
and then
not even sure what you mean by that
Sure anon, they're all over this board that hates them, they're in the room right now, they're in your walls making you browse /ss/ and e-girl threads.
Yeah, you troony abominations should hurry up and kill yourelves.
Case and point. I'm a straight cis white dude who fits the masculine archtype more than you ever will. (Wife, fit, engineering job, manly hobbies)
But I wrongthink so must be troony.
Honestly just end it Anon, you're just making your side look as pathetic as it is.
Nah, you can't even pass on an anonymous image board.
Whatever you need to believe to keep from killing yourself lmao.
Heere's a bit of curiosity.
Trannies are always whining about how the world hates them, and they're at risk of suicide and violence, and a troony genocide is right around the corner.
But then when you ask, why are such a ridiculous number of kids coming out as trans or nonbinary nowadays, how do they respond?
"The world is much more accepting of trans people now, so they are comfortable with coming out as their true selves."
Almost like things can be marginally better but still not great.
Almost like the US has more accepting areas and more regressive areas.
You'd undoubtedly accept that its easier to be openly gay now than 20 years ago, yet here you and other anons still are calling them groomers and to kill themselves for simply existing.
I know it's difficult to see on a board where everybody is anonymous, but I'm not calling gay people groomers.
You realize that doesn't negate the point
no one said YOU did you fricking moron
"yet here you and other anons still are calling them groomers and to kill themselves for simply existing."
shut the frick up, illiterate moron.
So when most of a friend group of girls all decide they're boys or otherwise not-girls, that's just because it's become more acceptable within their local environment?
I do agree with a certain part of your imagery, there are more accepting areas and less accepting areas. But there are also areas where it's so acceptable to be trans/nb, that it actually becomes less acceptable not to be.
And that's where troony-shit is a social contagion.
>we stop repressing a thing with violence and people feel more comfortable expressing it
You know interracial relationships were more common after the 50s too? Must be a mental illness!
I will never stop being surprised by how fricking stupid conservatives can be. 4 year olds can process cause and effect better than the average rightoid
There are two potential causes here.
That it's acceptable to be what you were all along.
Or it's trendy to pretend to be something that is so broadly defined that no one can contest that you aren't.
We have plenty of examples in the past of kids getting involved in some counter-culture thing that changes their outfit, language, and beliefs for a while. And then eventually they discard it.
And having a whole group of girls decide they are part of an extremely small minority that is supposed to be based on immutable trait, is plenty strange.
The only explanation that could work for you, is that the girls subconsciously knew that the others were also trans-inside, and became friends on that subconscious basis.
>gays only started existing because it was trendy, and nothing to do with the fact they got civil rights recognition so they were comfortable coming out
again, even 4 year olds have a better grasp of cause and effect than typical rightoids larping as logical.
You can't fake homosexuality. Not for long anyway.
You can EASILY fake trans/nb-shit. All you have to say is that,
"Oh, I've been doing some introspection, and realized my personality doesn't align PERFECTly with the ideals society has set for my sex. So, therefore, you have to change your language when you talk about me, so that you obfuscate any information on what my sex is, and validate whatever words I think reflects my gender identity better."
>But then when you ask, why are such a ridiculous number of kids coming out as trans or nonbinary nowadays, how do they respond?
By pointing out that things have improved considerably for these groups as acceptance and understanding has gotten better, and there are plenty of public role models for young people who want to come out to identify with now, but despite this there are still plenty of people still just want to discriminate and hate you for being different and it's politically expedient for the right to fearmonger over the topic for easy votes, which encourages that hate and fear.
fake. transexuals just want everybody to express their natural sexual preferences and desire, that also includes children who need to be guided by adults who already have the knowledge, this is called education, something you will never have.
>Transexuals just want everybody to express their natural sexual preferences and desire, >that also includes children who need to be guided by adults who already have the knowledge
Are you able to rephrase this in a way that is less creepy-sounding.
I could interpret it in a favorable way toward you, but I'd first like to know that my interpretation is accurate.
/LULZ/ definitely has to be 3rd place.
No, Christopher Rufo is not responsible for pushing CRT in schools, and there is nothing wrong with that definiton. If you rename CRT to.anything else, people will still be opposed to it, because they are opposed to the insane ideology underlying it, not to the name.
CRT is propaganda, and you haven't even said what your issue is with the actual definition, instead trying some weird ad hominem about the definition provided.
>It's gotten to the point to where alternative language like "involuntary relocated labor" is being suggested to get around saying "slavery"
And this is largely pushed by right wingers instead of liberals. Florida also has a law proposed to block history topics that give (white) children discomfort.
It's too easy to just make shit up online. Any predditor can do it.
These are easily verifiable facts.
No, I'm pointing out that you're a liar who can't keep their story straight, because CRT is indefensible.
great thread
>again, even 4 year olds have a better grasp of cause and effect than typical rightoids larping as logical.
again, whatever you need to believe to avoid killing yourself I suppose. I'm a cis straight dude more of a man than you'll ever be.
Yeah I get it, you think you see trans people around every corner. They're in your walls and the only explanation is they do it to spite you.
Cope, groomer.
I find a lot of the noisiest troon advocates in social media are claiming to be straight or asexual so they can play the rent-free card, which has no effect when played by an overt member of the group in question.
It's a fricking powerplay, dillweed.
Royal people get to append some honorific in front of their face, and they get to watch common people have to force themselves to honor your change or else face the power you hold.
Same thing with trannies, the main difference is that they're still accumulating power. So they're powerplay is only partially effective. As someone else said here, they are more accepted in certain areas than others.
They certainly seem to have some surface-level power in a lot of corporations, due to Black Rock forcing woke talking points onto them.
But fortunately on here, I can say to troony men, "You will never be a woman." And the worse that might happen is some janny closes the thread earlier than is justified.
But I can't say that on Reddit or Twitter without getting banned.
And I've heard that alot of schools and workplaces are also getting pretty strict about that shit.
> #
>again, whatever you need to believe to avoid killing yourself I suppose. I'm a cis straight dude more of a man than you'll ever be.
>
You can EASILY fake trans/nb-shit. All you have to say is that,
"Oh, I've been doing some introspection, and realized my personality doesn't align PERFECTly with the ideals society has set for my sex. So, therefore, you have to change your language when you talk about me, so that you obfuscate any information on what my sex is, and validate whatever words I think reflects my gender identity better." #
>Yeah I get it, you think you see trans people around every corner. They're in your walls and the only explanation is they do it to spite you.
(you)
>it's a fricking powerplay
Holy frick conservatives are so fricking fragile LMAO. Just KYS if you're this weak.
>Did you hear about how Chris Chan raped his own mother?
>HER NAME IS CHRISTINE, AND HER PRONOUNS ARE SHE/HER, YOU BIGOT!
i'm really sick of homosexuals and i'm really sick of their obssesion with children
CRT literally just turns every class issue into a race issue against working class whites.
Yeah, it's kind of like how the IRS can't afford to go after sufficiently rich people who cheat the tax system, so they instead go after the poor people.
If you've got a system set up that demonizes white people, will it do anything substantial to the white people who are ACTUALLY causing all the harm that minorities are suffering from?
No, because they have protections layered upon protections to insulate them from your influence.
Yes, there is, it's called an ESG score which directly affects a company's ability to secure financing.
Man, I wish I was gay. Heterosexual relationships are so toxic.
Reminder that Rufogay isnt paid to shill, he's posted screenshots of himself donating to twitter, so he pays to shill.
Imagine getting blown out by the exact same twitter screenshots day in and day out.
Good cope, so far, everyone is able to identify you're a moron instantly, and the best part is you don't even need a twitter post to do it because your schizo rants are so identifiable.
I don't rant because you get btfo by the same twitter screencaps over and over.
>i don't rant
Cope. You been doing that in this thread already.
Keep going. You might win the culture war this way.
I am positive that discrimination against trans people will increase and that it is both justified and necessary.
You only keep talking about black and white people. You're not talking about racism involving South Americans or Arabs or Chinese or Aboriginals or Filipinos or Indians or anybody else. Your fancy theories are only relevant in the Western bubble, while the rest of the world and their experiences with race get ignored. CRT seems pretty damn Americentric and arrogant to me.
>South Americans
never seen racism towards them, aside from the general "dey took r jerbs" surrounding latinos
>Arabs
post-9/11, yeah
>Chinese
only since the pandemic, but I like them as a whole
>Aboriginals
don't have those here
>Filipinos
I don't think people could pick them out of a lineup, and my best friend is one
>Indians
feather yes, dot no
>really I have no problem with any of the listed except burger blacks
>CRT seems pretty damn Americentric and arrogant to me.
because it's about America.
Foreigners get fricking confused because they consume so much American media but they're suddenly appalled that Americans discuss America in their media.
Americans from whatever race see themselves AS that race IN AMERICA, they don't associate with, or relate with their "brethren" elsewhere except on a conceptual level. So whenever you see Americans discuss race, you need to be aware that it's from that context.
Pretty much yeah
Oh, hey. It's that guy that faked a ghost haunting to get attention on Twitter.
O bet you are that teacher whonsaid that teaching teanny shit isnt grooming and calimed "we arwnt geooming your kids".
Then proceeded to get arrested for sexually abusing kids.
For all the gay anons on this thread. Let me ask you an honest question, did you have these feelings before you discovered masturbation? Yes or No?
I've been interested with muscular bara men since I was a pre-teen kid. I was obsessed with watching cartoons like He-Man and Dragon Ball Z and really any cartoon with hot muscular men in it and also watched a lot of those infomercials for exercise machines that usually showed male fitness models and bodybuilders. I was also very into transformation scenes at the time (muscle growth, body possession, etc.) and fondly remember any episode of a show that had those kinds of scenes. Adam's transformation to He-Man in the 2000's cartoon was a huge one for me.
I never realized those things were even fetishes until I knew what that word was and what it meant. When I knew the meaning I was already in my senior high school years when we were taught actual sex ed (because my country was severely conservative). That was also the year that I finally realized I was gay and yes when I learned what masturbation was.
Yes, I remember being fascinated with naked dudes. I really liked seeing male butt shots in tv and movies. It was all pre-sexual awakening, I didn't even think I was gay.
As a straight guy I was humping my pillow and squeezing my dick in the first Harry Potter book before I ever came or associated arousal with women
How is this Freud? An early experience with fat ass and pussy could forge an arousing connection between ass, pussy and fatness. I’m saying this because I know someone who’s into fat b***hes and he said he distinctly remembers being first aroused before puberty by a fat babysitter who almost sat on him. I’ve also heard of a scatophile who developed the connection by, for secrecy purposes, only jerking off on the toilet after taking a shit
Video games?
Are you lost Cinemaphile anon?
no. only pain.
Kid ain't gay because he finds masculinity attractive. Most men find masculinity attractive and strive to achieve such for themselves(I.E. gymrats). Now if the kid had fantasized about being drilled in the butt by the Brawny Man, he would be gay. This is not portrayed by the comic and as such leaves the question open as to why the kid thought he was gay. Which brings us here to 4kun to ask the question everyone needs the answer to.
>TL;DR yes this kid is a homosexual.
>Most men find masculinity attractive and strive to achieve such for themselves(I.E. gymrats).
Men get Cinemaphile to look good, feel good, and attract women or other gays. It's not that deep.
>Now if the kid had fantasized about being drilled in the butt by the Brawny Man, he would be gay.
A kid wouldn't know about buttfricking yet, genius. He's a gay kid but still a kid.
Once you know what conclusion you want, anything can be proof of it
If kids can be gay what's wrong with me being a pedo and loving straight little girls
It should be okay since I became a pedo while being a child myself, simply being attracted to the females of my own age and it just kinda never went away
if you were still a child there would be nothing bad about being attracted to children
It's about sexual orientation and not my age
OP kid isn't attracted to a little boy either
well orientation is different from preference. if you like underage girls you still like girls
Is being gay not a sexual orientation?
Can you "prefer" women but be gay by sexual orientation? What does it make you?
If kids can be gay they can also be straight. The same kid from OP pic could've been a girl who saw me changing in a pool locker when she accidently entered men's
>Even the "don't say gay" bill is about preventing conversations about how it's okay to have two dads.
Can you cite where on the bill it said that?
>Classroom instruction by school personnel or third parties on sexual orientation or gender identity may not occur in kindergarten through grade 3 or in a manner that is not age appropriate or developmentally appropriate for students in accordance with state standards.
Take a wild guess what gets to be considered not "age appropriate", and who is making those decisions.
A bill doesn’t have to explicitly list that x, y and z is now banned, thanks to how the wording is left vague enough that it can be interpreted in any way you want. And when it’s left vague, anyone who is directly affected by the law has to go out of their way avoiding anything with even a slim chance of opening yourself to a lawsuit, thus making certain things de facto banned even though it’s not technically said so in the law. And that’s what conservatives want, to silence and intimidate people to shut down and cower.
The Don’t Say Gay bill also didn’t ban rainbows from classrooms but schools removed them anyway because you could interpret that to be something that will get you into trouble because it’s associated with pride and being gay.
Same way a woman with an ectopic pregnancy will be denied abortion because hey, you aren’t in danger right this minute so it’d be illegal to do an abortion. Come back to us when you’re already internally bleeding to death and your vital’s are crashing, that’s a situation where the hospital is legally protected from being sued for an illegal abortion because now it’s literally a life or death situation. But not a second earlier. That is how these laws work in practice. Hopefully you learned something.
If you have no idea what "age appropriate" means, you shouldn't be an elementary school teacher.
Simple as.
Frick off.
Age appropriate has no one specific and clear way to interpret it. All you need is one zealot who thinks having a picture of your gay spouse is not appropriate to kids and you're fricked.
Florida already has thousands of teacher vacancies. This is literally leading to kids being less well educated due to not enough people being available to hold classes. But that's what conservatives want, gut the public sector so that they can prop up expensive private schools that most people won't afford and generally keep people stupid.
this, they should be more like our commiefornian leftist dystopia
Good, let it become the third world shithole that everyone thinks it is.
Nah, the LGB movement spent decades of work convincing people to tolerate their disgusting lifestyle by making it clear they weren't going after people's kids, only for TQ++ genderclowns to undo that work in a hilariously short amount of time by going exclusively and publicly after people's kids.
Yeah yeah, poor homosexuals dindu nuffin, it only started when trannies came by
No, the homosexuals just had enough sense to keep the groomers from publicly representing them.
Well their hands aren't tied now are they
So it's wrong for kids to be gay you say? Because why would it be if it's not ok for them to be straight
How exactly am I manipulating anyone if said hypothetical girl is attracted to me herself
Ig anything she's manipulating me since I'm a pedo
That scene in the Incredibles gave me a boner when Bob got covered in those black balls at a fast rate of fire, but it always grossed me out that it was him and not Helen
Why isn't it okay for me to touch and get touched by a little girl who's interested in me
exactly what part of arithmetic requires you to tell your students about your homosexual sex life in your homosexual sham of a marriage, and why would you ever think anyone will ever tolerate that behavior?
I'm a teacher, kids love asking questions about my personal life. I don't say much but I have mentioned my wife before (I'm a dude); I don't see how that's any different than a teacher who is gay mentioning their partner.
Not a single part of your post is true.
Just report him. His spam crossed into vacationland hours ago.
Florida
https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-news/florida-teacher-allegedly-fired-discussing-sexuality-students-rcna27656
Based.
https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-politics-and-policy/floridas-not-alone-19-states-eye-lgbtq-school-bills-rcna23304
Your whole country is a sitcom
Im so glad i dont live in it
>n****r on supreme court wants to ban gay marriage but not interracial marriage
What a clown show
It's pretty fricked up that someome who describes themselves as "pansexual" was even allowed near kids in the first place, but it sounds like the bill is doing its job.
>had a husband
>describes herself as pansexual
I think she was just hoping for dome /ss/ before shet got fired
I've had 5 gay teachers in my HS career and none ever mentioned their partners or sex lives. What greek statue pfp twitter did you take this image from?
Probably because they were merely homosexuals, and not TQ+++ genderclown groomers.
Notice how none of your straight teachers talked about their sex lives either?
Because it's not normal to talk to your students about your sex life.
I had plenty of teachers who mentioned their spouses. I even met some. It's also vastly more likely if it's a teacher who runs your extracurriculars because you speak to them more casually much more often.
TL;DR The whole thread: Straighties angry they have to deal with women so they take it out on gay men lmao
goddamn I come back from work hours later and this thread is still alive and full of screeching rightoids
all genuinely kys
The bill doesn't mention "gay" at all.
>It prohibits conversation about sexual orientation and gives parents the means to take schools to court if they suspect sexual orientation has been discussed in school.
So it doesn't mention gays at all, and everything you just said is a good thing.
>WHAT IF THEY ASK ABOUT INAPPROPRIATE SUBJECTS?
Then just like everything other inappropriate question, you tell them to ask their parents, not the government employed tutor.
If you can't follow this simple rule, you should avoid schools before you get lynched.
No, they have a mother and a father, one or more of which may be absent. They were not conceived through gay ass sex.
Is that a kid?
Not telling kids about being gay just leads them to become rapists and pedos
My anecdotal evidence is proof
>find out friend from childhood is gay
>had a controlling parent
>larped at being straight, "dating" a girl
>hear from some other people that knew him that he diddled some littleboys
>hes a middle school gym coach now
Get your wife's boyfriend's dick out of your mouth before you start typing again
>tfw learned about being gay in HS when i discovered the yaoi genre
I'm sure this sounded a lot better in your deranged groomer mind.
"Let me groom your kids to protect them from people like me" is certainly an interesting development in groomer tactics.
>just normalize pedophilia
you're not supposed to say that part out loud
>normal healthy adults
Lol
Lmao even
There is no such thing as a normal healthy adult
Especially in muttmerica
Amerimutts home from wagie, dinner is done time to ruin Cinemaphile f9r everyone else
I'm sure whatever you just posted was very interesting, but has failed to convince me that we should let trannies groom children.
Why did the conversation went from the gays to the trannies?
The right thinks gay = troony
But gay = troony is fact
Not really, one quite enjoys having their penis fully intact, the other not so much.
All gays are bottoms, all bis are tops
I'm gay and I'm a top, and not even the shitty femboygay type, sorry.
You're bi*
I assure you, pussy is gross as frick, I went to search for it on the internet, not great.
You already know he will just keep replying, save yourself the trouble and the time and stop replying
Because it's harder to empathize with others who are different than you (the core liberal social view) than it is to find things that a large part of America finds weird and tie your opponents to it.
Gays are accepted enough where (mostly) republicans can't straight up make them villains. God didn't light the country on fire and gay marriage being legalized didn't lead to them getting hit on as much as they'd hoped.
But trans people? They are yucky and America agrees, so lets make our social commentary all about a fraction of a percent of people who don't really bother anybody because it polls well.
America was founded by puritans who left england because they were too lenient on sodomites (nor publicly beheading them)
America is still a protestant puritan shithole, its taken them 250 years for anyone to even have the slightest liberal mindset and even then, american liberalism is lukewarm conservatism.
Also capitalism and big corpo running the country
A lot of the b***hing about grooming is about drag queens which is a gay thing and not a transgender thing and it's baffling how people are still conflating the two.
Getting a lot of 'they eat the poo poo' African preacher vibes from a good chunk of the posters here. Hicks with internet, probably think the pull out method and that one fifth grade sex ed video they watched is all they ever needed.
I mean, sex-ed for 12 yrs old probably isn't the best idea, but after puberty hits for basically everyone I don't see much of a problem, as long as it's objective and very careful and delicate with the subject of course.
12 year olds is grade 7/8...
When i was in grade 7/8, kids were already suckin n fricking
I meant kids younger than 12 yrs, I forgot to put that part.
I suppose you are right, I guess it's just kinda weird if you think about it.
>hold on lemme move the goalpost
My sexed class was in grade 7, when i was 11.
Kids born in november/december should be held back a grade imo. Everyone always felt 1 year older than me..
Anyway they just taught about the penis and the vegana, stds and condom use.
Its weird to be taught about foreskin and be the only one in class who has it
Puberty can start (in normal kids) at 8 (for girls) to 9 (boys)... for childhood obesity aka fatties? The new American health crisis has the added bonus of speeding up puberty (fat cells contribute to estrogen production) in girls, some as early as 5-6 now.
I mean, you heard about that 10 year old who had to go for an abortion recently right? She was 9 when she got pregnant.
Germany has been teaching kids in school, elementary age/as young as five sex ed since 1992.
Biggest change they saw was teen pregnancies dropped, nothing else really came of it.
Germany also put orphans in the care of pedos to try and make sure they never became masculine enough to become Nazis. I don't think we want to use them as a standard for anything.
>source, my schizophrenia
MEDS
My mistake, it was from someone else's schizophrenia, carry on.
Did you check their sources? Because that shit happened.
They didn't post their sources under the video... but more importantly I'm not motivated to engage with shizos who have time to watch a video podcast catering to your culture wars bullshit put for by "the lotus eaters"
NTA
here's a source by simply google searching the video title
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helmut_Kentler
way to out yourself as a worthless moron though, filtered
And it takes three seconds reading it to realize that while he had funding from the German senate, he did not disclose the nature of the study/fact he was putting these children in these homes until the statute of limitations had run out, and when it was revealed it caused major scandal/investigations because the German government was not cool with it. Rather than you know, an adequate response to a sanctioned widespread government mandated educational initiative that I put forward... you brought up one widely reviled professor acting outside his mandate.
So... going to stand by what I said before when I called you a schizo.
I stand by what I said Germany did it, perhaps without knowing but they still did it. Just like how they turned off their nuclear reactors and hopped on the Russian oil tit to go green or that they had a little Nazi problem. Germans are constantly terrible and no one should use them as a role model.
It was one rogue guy who knew what he did was evil. That's like saying America is a nation that pushes cannibalism because there are probably some that got away with it/weren't arrested.
You can keep trying to broaden the conversation, but I stand by what I said before, if your entire criticism of a successful social program is 'but what about that one guy who secretly did something illegal decades before it'... was that really your best angle of attack? Your best point?
So yeah, I stand by asking you to take your meds.
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/07/26/the-german-experiment-that-placed-foster-children-with-pedophiles
It took like three seconds when you go to their website.
There's nothing in common with troony groomers and sex ed, and crossdressing homosexuals who think men cn get pregnant shouldn't be teaching sex ed either.
I spent too long learning English to be bothered with learning the latest edition of Newspeak.
Yeah but they didn't change what a woman means on me.
From what I gathered from this thread is things could be a easier if people were more honest with themselves and each other.
>vague statement
WOW
YOU SAID IT ANON
VERY BADED
>on this board
WHY DO YOU homosexualS KEEP CONFUSING Cinemaphile FOR REAL LIFE? WHAT SCHOOL DOES THIS LOOK LIKE? WHAT CHURCH IS THIS? WHAT CHILDCARE PROFESIONALS ARE WORKING WITH KIDS HERE? THIS IS A PLACE FOR homosexualS, moronS, AND MANCHILDERN. YOU FRICKING JOGGGER.
>allcaps
>uses jogger
go chimpout somewhere else you stupid google
I'm not the one confused to why a place for rejects and failures is not the same as a company, government, or school. I just have to shout it to you deaf nogs
A janny literally deleted 70 posts to keep this going. You can't make this shit up.
This thread has crossed the line of gay and right into unadulterated homosexualry.
>janny leaves the rufogay posts
And these morons think they're being censored
lol
>infant
the infant doesnt give a frick, he's just happy that everyone else is having a good time
also the blame is on the parents for thinking this is a good thing to bring a kid now
>oy vey i had a kid my social life is over
>or is it
>brings baby to PG13+ movies, loud venues, wherever
>YOU CANT BE MAD AT ME OR YOU'RE IN THE WRONG
You've never seen an infant at a stripper bar?
Uh.
No.
It happens. Some women can't afford a babysitter and need to pay the bills.
No, I haven't you disgusting groomer.
If gays and trannies are exploiting a climate of sympathy to abuse children they learned it by taking notes from Christians
>i-it's your fault I'm a troony groomer!
haha, face the wall
Go ahead, Keith. Pull the fourth reich lever. You b***h cowards have been threatening it for 40 years. Stockpiles of weapons and the evangelicals basically owning half the government and your kids are still turning fricking queer.
Even sadder is that he's been here all day
Im actually proud of rufogay, usually by now he's crying about how jannies are trannies and are censoring him, but he's finally got his thread to himself.
I think he applied to be a janny. Lets see how long it lasts.
That looks like a bachelor party where the friends are fricking with the groom. Not a reading club btw.
>rufogay is now going to delete all the posts calling him a homosexual
You really cant make this shit up.
>cries over deleted posts while accusing anyone else of crying over deleted posts
lol
Nobody is crying rufogay, they're calling you a homosexual.
Keep those b***h tears flowing lol
Ok homosexual
>Cinemaphile - Comics & Cartoons
This comic is haram
Brothers
It would be arab spring if there were 4 arab men circled around him and sexually assaulting him though.
So why aren't mad at the ice cream shop for advertising their slogan at the drag club?
It happened at the ice cream shop though. I guess be mad that it's their slogan lol.
it's been a good run boys
janny killed thread in an effort to keep it alive
How did he try to keep it alive? All he did was make it a sandbox for rufo twittergays
No. No it hasn't
kys