Alan Moore and troons of Cinemaphile blown the frick out. It's over
 Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
 Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
HOLY FRICKING SHIT
Alan Moore and troons of Cinemaphile blown the frick out. It's over
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
they were both right
The holocaust was situational ethics
I enjoy fantasy.
Checked, but it happened. Be glad that it did.
It is a permanently poisoned foundation myth to justify the creation of Israel and the eternal guilt of white people.
What happened to all of that 109 countries shit? I thought you homosexuals were all about “TJD” and shit. Now you insist that your greatest achievement is a lie? Make up your mind, moron.
TKD is a moral imperative
Wrong.
Alan Moore seething eternally by making his antagonistic point of view towards right-wingers a cool character loved by everyone who read his bad Charlton Comics fanfic.
Don't even mention the Comedian.
What if Veidt is vegetarian and Kovacs is a meatcuck? Veidt, even after slaughtering NYC, would have less blood on his hands than your average meatcuck.
Rorsach ate anything, but mostly cold, canned food, because he was practical and also because he was homeless.
I'm having another steak for dinner just to piss off vegan homosexuals.
This is like a cannibal continuing to eat humans to spite people with morals. You just end up looking like a moron without morals.
>t. Cheating vegan
???
You are a lying gayBlack person who only takes up these positions in arguments to “own the chuds.” There is not a single ounce of honesty within your mind.
What the frick are you talking about you schizo? Who do you think you're talking to?
You wouldn’t know what veganism is if it raped your mother in front of you. Frick off, faker. Go get an incantation from that tainted twat Alan Poore for all we care.
I'm genuinely confused about this conversation. Did you take your meds? Are you well?
>incessant questions like a Redditor
You will never be a woman.
I’m going to enjoy 102 years of kicking ass, thank you very much. Oh and I quit beef even when I still ate animals because chickens are superior. I’m not a moral vegan, just one concerned with health. Try getting real with what you put in your body for once.
Go leave you fricking nutcase.
Go back to Roddit, where people are allowed to be poseurs and not get called out on it.
Poseurs? What the frick are you talking about you mentally ill loser? I'm vegan. I don't eat animal products. You concocted some moronic story in your subhuman low IQ brain that doesn't make sense to anyone but you.
Do you enjoy beefy farts as a substitute and sniff them up in elevators to satiate your cravings?
I said vegetarian once and you spun it into a seethefest over vegans
Take note, aspiring comic makers if you want to create decades of seethe you should make your moral greek tragedy monologuers insult meatcucks once lololololol
You must have the wrong guy. I’m the actual vegan here, and I enjoyed my jackfruit TexMex and rye toast dinner just 30 minutes ago without the need to chug Parkinson’s liquid (cow milk) or to fry a dead kid on a pan (egg). You can kindly join the rest of the carnies in the Shit Pit, rapist murderer, and you can also cope and seethe knowing that Rorschach was always right.
#beanjuiceforever
Suck it vegan homosexual.
But it's not because anon's not a cow, unless he has a very large keyboard designed for use with hooves
unironically,
if you love cows so much why dont you marry one
Because I'm already married to justice.
Trolley problem
Wasnt most of Alan moores seething less about rorshach himself and more the fact every person he met who talked about how big a fan they were was a creep?
NO YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND. HE EATS BEANS, HOW COULD YOU POSSIBLY LIKE HIM. HE EATS BEANS, HE EATS BEEEEANS
Why do anti-Moore troons always strawman him to hell and pretend he didn’t intentionally make Rorshach to be likeable? You homosexuals are unable to think of characters being something outside of “represents thing good” and “represents thing bad”. Rorschach is supposed to be both a sympathetic AND morally challenging character. Moore was seething about people saying that Rorschach was literally them, not liking the character.
An anti-Moore troon would hate Watchmen entirely not be a Rorschach fan
Heh, nice try tho. You and Moore are the troons!
>anti-Moore troons
all comic books are for trannies homosexual
These people are moronic and think that Moore making Rorschach out to be the most potent and heroic POV character was somehow an accident.
Like he just accidentally wrote Rorschach as the only hero that wasn't either useless.
The point was always the contrast. Rorschach was a delusional right wing thug that judged everything strictly according to his deranged morals. But he was also genuinely heroic and wanted to do what he thought was best for the world with his own hands, no matter the cost.
But no, because Moore was a socialist or whatever, that means it was completely accidental.
*either useless or just absent
>Leftist commie larpers think its morally okay to kill millions of innocent people if its for muh greater good and stability
>Tell them that the war in Iraq is good because it strengthens their home country and they call you ontologically evil and unempathetic
Leftists talk shit but they don't have the conviction to carry any of their beliefs out all the way
I'm not surprised in the least.
What about the US getting stronger is for the greater good of the world?
He'd have to be a different character entirely for that.
>Something being for the greater good of your own family and people doesn't count, greater good only means for the world only!
Nice cope, but by your own logic now killing any amount of humans is a moral good because the existence of humans doesn't work well for the greater good of the earths species which greatly out number humans. So the US is doing a net good by killing arabs.
Here's another hypothetical for you anon, poverty within western nations is for the greater good because only a small percentage of people starve while the greater masses live well off within a capitalistic system. Now go ahead and tell me how angry this makes you and how unempathetic I am to the poor.
I dont read the words, i just like when he punches people, how do you make his costume stick so close to his muscles?
>how do you make his costume stick so close to his muscles
Never made sense as a question for a comic.
It's like asking how do you make his skin blue
>innocent
>people
Some never mature past 14, sad.
oooooh lok at mommy's little edgy boy! you are a person so you cant be innocent. I guess you wont mind when I glass you at the bar this weekend for no reason, because after all you deserve it because you are human right?
When people make arguments like this are they okay if they happen to be one of those one million?
This is why I think Ozymandias would have had a stronger moral standing if he had intentionally killed himself in that same blast. It would have cemented how strong of a conviction he had that this was the only path forward and that he knew that he had no right to sacrifice these people for a world they would never see so at least he was willing to put himself in the same position as them.
Someone like that would have the arrogance to believe the world could not continue without him.
>Ozymandias would have had a stronger moral standing if he had intentionally killed himself
I disagree. If he killed himself I'd think "he's running away from the shame! He can't face the music!"
Maybe a couple of years later. But when he did it he felt that he was absolutely correct in doing so. It doesn't matter how other people in-universe would have interpreted his suicide. The question is what we, as the readers, would have thought of him. And if he had killed himself in that situation with the conviction that it was the right thing to do, it would have demonstrated that he was just as morally grounded as Rorschach, just with different beliefs.
Yes, but that'd require Oz not to be the epitome of arrogance and ego.
>you can't glass a million people because... because you just can't, ok?
>This makes Alan Moore piss and shit his pants in terror and disgust
Oh, I get it now. They think every story has a good guy. They really are illiterate.
YEAH BASED MORALISM, HEY YOU KNOW WHAT? LETS KILL THAT homosexual REDDITOR WHO WRITE THAT BIT AND TAKE HIS ORGANS, BLOOD AND BONEMATTER TO SAVE 5 PEOPLE
genuinely good idea anon, impressive, very nice
what undermine moore's message is his cynicism. let's review the end of watchmen in detail
>Owlboy and Silk are fricking after Ozy has ""won"
>Dr. Manhattan killed Rorschach because he was cucked and gave up on humanity
>Ozzy's plan is made to look like saturday morning crap, like Gi Joe's Cobra
Rorschach appears to be right, because he is right. Moore ends up disproving his point by being a smartass
Redditschach wasn’t right just because the others were wrong. You can just as easily say, “Ozy was right because Rorschach got killed like a moron and amounted to changing nothing”. None of them were right. The only character you get the sense that Moore thinks has a reasonable reaction to the events is Blue Autism Man who just wants nothing to do with it.
He doesn't want anything, because of pussy. He left because Silk didn't want to frick him, Moore wrote the same plot in miracleman and swamp thing
Night Owl and Silk being extremely self-centered was intentional.
He wasn't Batman. He was just a dude.
Ultimately I think the importance of Moore's own work escapes him.
He wrote watchmen as the greatest psyop in human history. I doubt he realized it but what he was writing about was the Holocaust.
His other works also chart the decline of western civilization (LOEG) and how sexual freedom inevitably leads to degeneracy and madness (Providence).
Moore and Watchmengays were BTFO even before Watchmen was released.
Squadron Supreme was always the superior moral examination of capeshit
it's not that good, comic book nerd
they didn't even use the same artist throughout
>le art in watchmen is so deep because it's symmetrical
get out of here with your bs, it's still capeshit, and it doesn't contribute to the story told.
next you're gonna tell us the black freighter is a good allegory
What makes SS much better than Watchmen is that Gruenwald didn't pretend he wrote Hamlet
'Truth' isn't even a relevant axion when discussing utilitarianism vs moral relativism vs moral absolutism. This guy doesn't even understand the words he's using to soapbox with.
stfu you fricking nerd
>what if superheroes were… le bad?
Watchmen was always moronic and Moore is a commie homosexual.
The only meta superhero story that managed to work perfectly as both a commentary on the genre/artform AND as a self contained superhero story that you could have fun reading from issue to issue. Everyone else should just stick to making straight superhero stories. Even Moore’s straight capeshit is better than his subversionshit.