How blasphemous is this?

How blasphemous is this?

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Drinking and smoking is OK according to the Church as long as you don't indulge too much

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    not at all, looks comfy

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    funny how the right went full 1984 this censorship that when they basically invented the idea of wrongthink with "blasphemy" and "heresy"

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Tbh we wouldn’t be in this mess if they hadn’t loosened up and tried to be cool. Should have just kept roasting edgelords into the modern era

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      It really…makes you think…we live in a society

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      funny how hollywood is afraid to make shows shitting on muslims.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >the modern American right/left dichotomy existed in the dark ages
      I would expect as much retardation from somebody who unironically thinks in terms of “right or left”

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >dark ages
        you’re just as retarded

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      He's right you know

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      cool where is "the young imam" where he smokes and says he doesn't believe in allah

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I never understood the whole "heresy" thing
      >your beliefs and my beliefs are 99% the same, but because there is 1% that's different, I must kill you

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        heresy is any (bad enough) deviation from core beliefs. It's relative. Catholics and prots disagree, and prots disagree among themselves, but we all still believe some core tenets like Christ is the son of God, God himself, died and rose, etc.
        Common Christian heresies are rejecting the trinity, rejecting the bodily resuscitation (super liberal modern prots), rejecting Christs divinity (islam), following any prophets after Christ (mormons).
        But in practice everyone just calls everyone else heretics so might aswell meme it

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          My Heresy is believing that Jehova, YHWH, Allah, Ahura Mazda, and possibly Janus are all the same God. There could be even more "outsider" faiths and and independent reached by reason like the various "Godheads" in philosphy.

          Where do I fall on the heresy scale? Do I get the stake?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Indifferentism

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Oh I don't actually believe that. Merely that God is a person, and like all people his public perception changes from person to person and from time to time. I still think Christianity is the closest and so far final Revelation but it's no doubt far incomplete on the truth and nature of God just like historical account of a legendary king could say very little of the truth of that person.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            yeah you would be a heretic for most of those since they declare themselves to be the only and true god.

            Indifferentism

            didn't even know this existed, for me it sounds like new age spirituals.

            Oh I don't actually believe that. Merely that God is a person, and like all people his public perception changes from person to person and from time to time. I still think Christianity is the closest and so far final Revelation but it's no doubt far incomplete on the truth and nature of God just like historical account of a legendary king could say very little of the truth of that person.

            you could say the abrahamic god is the same, no one knows for sure where allah came from. Jesus says he is the last truth, and so does muhammad, so you have to do a lot of mental gymnastics to say they are all true.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Heresy only became an issue in Christianity when the heretics started directly smack talking the church and the pope. Before that a heresy was basically just some monks arguing between each other about whether communal wine actually turns into the blood of Christ when you drink it. Its not until like the 13th century that the church start actually taking heresies like catharism so seriously that they're willing to launch crusades over it and just about as soon as they do they realize that crusading over heresies is a horrible way to solve the issue. Of course they didn't solve the issues with the church that catharism was largely driven by so later you have the protestant reformation being driven by largely the same issues. That results in religious wars all over Europe because people all over Europe start breaking off from the church and start doing legit insane shit. For example the catholic church never went around burning witches, that's something that only starts happening after protestants break from catholic dogma and some cathologic are rightfully horrified by a huge amount of things that various movements are doing and try to stop them which ends up turning into wars. Those wars start deciding actual national borders with denominations being the key dividing line and you have resentment between nations which fuels more wars. These things evolve over hundreds of years and eventually you have issues like Brexit possibly resulting in a new IRA forming over the border dispute between EU Ireland and UK Northern Ireland.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Before that a heresy was basically just some monks arguing between each other about whether communal wine actually turns into the blood of Christ when you drink it. Its not until like the 13th century that the church start actually taking heresies like catharism so seriously.

          Nah m8, heresy was a huge deal even when Western Rome was still in power. Christian bishops feuded with each other and whole Christian communities rioted over ideas like how the Trinity worked or if the Eucharist was the blood of Christ or just symbolic.

          "Against Heresies" was written in 180 AD by Saint Irenaeus. Even in early Christianity there were Gnostics trying to appropriate Christ and Catholic bishops who tried to push heresies among their flock.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        If you knew about early church history, you'd understand why it's important. There were countless different sects with different beliefs, and when Constantine decided to legitimize Christianity, he forced them to gather together to form an actual canon they could all agree on, which didn't even work as some popular Christian belief systems - like Arius' - were denounced as heresy right from the start. Since then it's been a constant battle to keep all the shit together. It works in much the same way a nation's government needs to clear out rebel factions forming inside its territory so it doesn't splinter into a thousand small pieces.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      1984 was just as much an allegory of past church practices as it was a projection of 20th century political trends.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        It was literally an emulation of what state atheist communist countries were doing at the time, coping homosexual

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >emulation

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >the right invented "blasphemy" and "heresy"
      How can Americans be so stupid? Your country was founded by heretics and blasphemers.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        They were founded by masons larping as Romans lmao.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The "right wing" were never Christians to begin with. You're thinking in completely modern terms and trying to equivocate it to the medieval era. The US was not founded on Christianity (the puritans weren't the US), and neither was the rest of 1800s Europe. The concept of "free speech" is completely alien to Christianity, it is an Enlightenment principle.

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    it's not

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The show? Incredibly blasphemous according to my tradcath ex gf

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      what about her presumably having relations out side of marriage

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The Pope is not supposed to have emotions. He's supposed to sit in a circular room and meditate all day long in the criss-cross-applesauce position.

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Blasphemous? Hard to say
    Historically speaking? It's pretty on par for a lot of popes in history

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    still better than pope Fr*ncis

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It'll make you legitimacy respect catholicism more.

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Redpill me on the holocaust guys. I'm ready.

    Starvation and typhus because the allies bombed the German supply lines?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Starvation and typhus because the allies bombed the German supply lines?

      The remains of more than 350,000 people are in the mass graves at Belzec alone, a camp with a maximum capacity for 11,000 prisoners. Did the entire population of the camp succumb to typhus and starvation 32 times over in two years? Or maybe it was the gas chambers...

      Mass Graves at Nazi Extermination Camps
      http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2010/05/mass-graves-at-nazi-extermination-camps.html

      Human remains inside the mass graves at Chełmno, Bełżec and Sobibór
      http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2011/08/human-remains-inside-mass-graves-at.html

      Mass Graves and Dead Bodies
      http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2010/10/mass-graves-and-dead-bodies.html

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >350k at Belzec
        Even Yid controlled Wikipedia doesn’t support this. There is zero evidence of this as no excavation has been done.
        They estimate some 11k-33k “cremated” remains are distributed among “mass graves there.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >There is zero evidence of this as no excavation has been done.

          Except that's not true. Let me repost these for you:

          Mass Graves at Nazi Extermination Camps
          http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2010/05/mass-graves-at-nazi-extermination-camps.html

          Human remains inside the mass graves at Chełmno, Bełżec and Sobibór
          http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2011/08/human-remains-inside-mass-graves-at.html

          Mass Graves and Dead Bodies
          http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2010/10/mass-graves-and-dead-bodies.html

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            To be clear your angle is that it’s bullshit right because anybody looking at these numbers can tell

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >photographic evidence
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photography_of_the_Holocaust
      >eyewitness testimony
      https://www.archives.gov/exhibits/eyewitness/html.php?section=7
      >confession of former nazis

      ?t=144
      >document evidence
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H%C3%B6fle_Telegram
      >physical evidence
      https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/unearthing-the-atrocities-of-nazi-death-camps/

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    A lot just by virtue of treating the papacy with irreverency.

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    First season is excellent, the last 3 episodes are incredible, the speech about God is Peace to the African warring tribes was amazing.

    Also the show has Miracles and tries to explain how Lenny " aka The Pope " is a living Saint.You'll love the Miracle scene. This show is far from blasphemy, it's almost perfect.

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The speech is still one of my favorite in any TV show or movie. Pure Christina Kino.

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    read into some of the other popes, this one is basically a saint

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    he's literally a saint

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I only watched the first season, but I thought it was great. It's a bit irreverent but I wouldn't say it's blasphemous at all, it's a very earnest take on faith and Catholicism

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >a cucktholic
    straight down to hell

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Religion is only good as a shallow aesthetic. Try to find deeper meaning and you need to plug your ears and go NANANANANA at least a dozen times in order for anything to make sense.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      literally all of the most profound literature in history is religious. all atheism has produced is sophomoric slop

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I only watched the first season and it was really good. I wish there was a version with no sex so I could watch it with my mom

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    looks like a holy man partaking in some of the natural flora that God blessed the earth with
    nothing blasphemous about it

  21. 1 month ago
    Dunkaccino

    Jude Law can do whatever the fuck he wants because he’s Jude Law

  22. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    he says he doesn't believe in god at the end of the pilot, I think that's more blasphemous than smoking

  23. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH I'M GONNA EXCOMMUNICATE AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH I'M EXCOMMUNICATING AAAAAAAHHHHH

  24. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Not too bad. New Pope on the other hand is super pozzed

  25. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Kill yourself, shill. Stop spamming this evil shit

  26. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Season 2 is worse in terms of blasphemy because of how heavily and unnecessarily sexualized it is compared to the first. The first season does have its moments though:

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I straight up didn’t watch it after seeing the woman with the miracle baby white herself out to a retarded boy egged on by her new boyfriend after splitting from her husband. What I just posted is a microchosm for why s2 was so bad

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah, that was atrocious, also, it was terrible without Jude Law

  27. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It has the pope praying to God to kill a nun and he complies.

    Which is based don't get me wrong, but propably counter to church teachings.

  28. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >The Young Pope
    Not at all. It's a genuine love letter to Christianity. It's the only piece of media to come out in the last ten years which has religion as a focus and isn't intent on shitting on it.
    It made me laugh. It made me smile. It made me tear up. It's kino.
    >The New Pope
    I would argue it's a bit more up there. It's literally the fallout of a saint dying. I didn't like it.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *