All the cards were stacked against it, and yet it came out as the single greatest film of the 2010s. Even did a better job adapting the book than the original, amazing.
 |
 |
|
How could a sequel to such a shitty movie like Blade Runner be so kino?
>it's the blade runner autist again
???
>Everyone on Cinemaphile is one person
>Reddit frog
>phoneposter filename
Stop posting.
suck muh dick
Maybe stop spamming the same thread every day
>A movie by a specific director is currently relevant
>People get reminded about his earlier work as a consequence
>They start discussing the early work as well
This is pretty simple, but considering you're braindead and probably autistic, I know this might be hard for you.
>discussing
where is the discussion? This thread is just you acting like a villeneuve fanboy and calling anyone who disagrees with you a moron. You want the truh? Both movies are mid. Now feel free to call me a braindead autist again
Villenuhack shills really are trying to force his shitty dull movies its pathetic
It's better than the original Blade Runner. That's my sincere opinion. Nostalgia goggles cloud peoples' judgement on the first Blade Runner
It has to appreciated that BR2049 is perhaps the only movie of his oeuvre where Villeneuve decides to indulge in a colour palette. I say this as a fan of DUNC 2, despite the limited palette. BR2049 is actually colourful. Please use more colour in the future Denis
The biggest problem with BR2049 is the awful posters and marketing
You go girl… I mean, I’m sorry for your loss? I don’t know I didn’t read it
>Nostalgia goggles cloud peoples' judgement on the first Blade Runner
I saw the original after 2049, and prefer the original.
Then you're just moronic, or a zoomer obsessed with old things even when they're shit.
>old bad, new good!
No, I have the actual capacity to judge whether or not I like things.
And, for how we know you’re the same person as yesterday (
), it’s that you are aggressively against the original, and continue to claim that 2049 was instantly more popular than it here (
), which wasn’t true.
>old bad, new good!
As compared to your old good new bad?
>and continue to claim that 2049 was instantly more popular than it here
That's just fact and anyone who was here can remember it
It's a derivative arthouse flick riding the coattails of the original. There wasn't a real need for it to be made. I say this as someone who only watched the first film like a year or two before 2049 came out.
Oh boy the same general plot and meaning from the first film but with a less inspired, more generic and boring visual style...This is SOOO much better...
Trick statement, the original didn't have a plot, br2049 did.
They are two halfs making a whole, they are ying and yang.
More villenuhack shill threads.... you shills and tourists from reddit are glowing so bad
>Calls me the tourist
BR2049 was certified as Cinemaphilecore when it came out, when you weren't even posting here. Everyone already agreed back then that it was kino and a improvement over the original.
the only kino thing was the scenes which became memes but other than that it shits upon the original and is a dull soulless adaptation just like his Dune movies where the 80s original movie is better
You're a braindead boomer if you think that. Everything the original did, 2049 did better.
>y-you have to like new and soulless slop
It's literally more soulful than the original.
this is true, that was the sentiment and retroactively deciding villeneuve is a hack and lumping him in with nolan are both new teevee opinions
This movie was kino for the first half. But as soon as Harrison Ford appears it turns to slop. Could just feel all the redditors making basedjack faces around me and saying "We sloppin' now".
Daily reminder that his kino will always be bettter than the original, the first one was a shlock Sci Fi detective flick, but a pretty bad one at that.
>The first one wasn't a detective film!
It had all the elements of a noir film, too bad they forgot about the case halfway trough the film and they just have the replicants land into Deckards hand.
Even Harrison Ford says that about the fricking movie
>B-But the first one was deeper!
If you think the first one was deep or somehow deeper you are a fricking moron.
The new one actually properly developed the ideas of the book, the first one didn't, and even the detective mystery sucked because Deckard just waited the case to come to him
>T-The movie was better than the book anyway
Please explain how? Because all it did was throw some ideas and themes from the book but they never properly work.
Blade Runner 2049 is kino. The best movie to come out in the past 20 years.
it would be even better if you remove Harrison Ford and his storyline
Harrison Ford gave a great performance in this film. It's kind of the opposite of what happened with Star Wars TFA where he phoned it in
You need Ford there so the Goose can play off him in his belief that he's something special, because the most important development is the Goose realising he's nothing special
i mean because of member berries, i have nothing against Harrison Ford
>Harrison Ford gave a great performance in this film
>Refuses to wear costume so spends the entire movie in a grey t shirt from his own wardrobe
Men who live past their 50s are a bad thing
He's living alone in New Vegas with his dog, drinking himself to death and feeling bitter. WTF would you be wearing?
>implying 2049 has a performance as kino as rutger hauer's
This movie is sci-fi Drive and I wouldn't be convinced otherwise.
The craziest part is that it's a Columbia Pictures (aka Sony) film. Shit is a literal miracle that it's not an embarrassing clusterfrick of corporate meddling and decades of rewrites.
I'm not even a plotgay but the original movie is just boring because Deckard is a terrible character. Roy Batty is great and all but unfortunately he can't carry the entire movie. It's supposed to be this noir detective thing but everything about the case feels arbitrary and just barely, BARELY strung together on a scene by scene basis, there's no flow and if you're doing a noir detective story it is pretty important to have some kind of a flow as the fricking detective explores the case and learns more which takes him deeper, but there's none of that in BR, its just "here's a scene, and here's a scene"
Which would be a lot more tolerable if Deckard was actually a good character but he's not.
It sure looks better than 2049 does, and the music is way better than the Hans Zimmer slop in 2049. But K is a much better portagonist, there's an actual story, it has much better pacing and is all around a more engaging movie.