How did left BTFO right so hard? The entire film was an embarrassment but especially that interrogation scene with Riddler spazzing out.

How did left BTFO right so hard? The entire film was an embarrassment but especially that interrogation scene with Riddler spazzing out. A scene added in reshoots written and directed by Zack Snyder makes a better Batman movie than The Batman.

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Left is entirely original. You've a post-apocalyptic future with Batman and Joker being friends and wearing crazy clothes.
    Right is just that The Dark Knight scene but without any rhyme or reason.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      fpbp. Everything about The Batman felt like "didn't we already do this a few years ago in the Dark Knight Trilogy?" It's basically the same concept-- take the world of Batman, suck all the fantasy out of it and make it "real," except it's even darker and grittier and without any of the fanciful technology in the Nolan films.

      It wasn't bad but I think people way overhype it. It feels kind of like a fan-film spinoff of the Nolan trilogy. That's not to say it felt cheap or amateurish, but it has that kind of uncanny thing some fan films do where they get really close to matching the style and production quality of the real thing, but you can also tell that their resources are more limited and the actors are just whoever they had to work with, and they did they best they could but it still feels off.

      I'm not convinced that The Batman is going to be a franchise after all the behind the scenes reports of what a nightmare the production was. It made 3/4 of a billion dollars and probably got a ton of views on HBO, but was that enough to justify all of the headaches the production caused for the studio? Especially when, allegedly, it was the most expensive Batman film ever made? It looks like a $100 million movie, but with all the rewrites and reshoots it apparently cost close to $300 million.

      Other movies in the franchise did a lot more with a lot less, and personally I feel like if we have to suck all the fantasy out of the Batman IP, it's probably time to move on to something other than superheroes.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Hit the nail in the coffin. The problem is that directors just want emulate Nolan's sense of realism, when even Nolan never went too far-fetched with the realism. Director's are too afraid to make Batman the fantastical character he's supposed to be. This is why we are never going to see characters like Killer Croc, Luchador Bane, Mister Freeze, Clayface, Maxie Zeus, Lazarus addicted Ra's, and Posion Ivy on the big-screen.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        And the worst thing is that the tickets for the movie had a cost overrun and even then it didn't reach a billion

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Name one thing this movie did that Nolan also did.
        >there's an interrogation scene!
        Of course there is. Nearly every Batman comic has one.
        >there's a realistic Batman!
        Okay? You got a comic book one with Affleck.
        What did Reeves copy?

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    this joker will be shit but normies will eat it up and some will even compare it to joaquer and ledger. At this point Im convinced that most people have no soul/can’t tap into the objective realities of the universe to understand whats actually good and whats inherently bad. And no it doesn’t change even if 99% of humans think the bad thing is “good”. It is still objectively bad.
    Also all my opinions are facts and the people I disagree with are wrong, unironically

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >this joker will be shit but normies will eat it up
      the batman was a flop especially with normies, Suicide Squad was a hit with them

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >the batman was a flop especially with normies
        not true at all, it was a pretty mainstream film, especially among capeshit fans and widely regarded as better than the the nolan trilogy.
        I just thought it was an unnecessary, mediocre flick

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >especially among capeshit fans and widely regarded as better than the the nolan trilogy.
          But in reality that didn't happen.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Have you been living under a rock?

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              There was a brief buzz about The Batman that was gone after a week, people soured on it quickly.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Wonder how you got to that conclusion, everywhere on social media I saw people saying it was better than the nolan trilogy, even the threads on this board the general consensus is just that.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >everywhere on social media I saw people saying it was better than the nolan trilogy
                The frick are you talking about? TDK beat it in many polls in all the internet. TDK is still loved by everyone.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Doesn’t seem that unanimous to me

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        The only good character in suicide squad was Boomerang

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    are you fricking kidding me
    left is plastic capeshit
    right is hardcore acting
    Jared Leto better than Classic Paul Dano?
    NO NO NO NO NO
    And Ben Affleck looks like he's literally wearing a puffed-up Halloween costum

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >hardcore acting

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        The way Paul Dano snaps was kino
        cope

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          It was embarrassing anon multiple people were snickering in my theater.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >right is hardcore acting
      Reminder that Reeves cast a literally who as the joker, made him hideous and already locked because he doesn't want to use the joker in the sequel

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          My opinion is that it was a shitty scene in an even shittier movie. Matt Reeves direction is TV tier and his writing is atrocious.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah, the writing was cringe. But the acting in that scene was phenomenal. That's the only thing that really matters to me in a movie. The whole movie was worth it just to see Paul Dano wrench away from the glass into the room corner.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              The acting was fricking awful.
              You've Pattinson doing the same shit he did throughout the entire movie - look around the room as a brooding homosexual than look direct at the camera with an annoyed face before making a face as if he was about to cry.
              You also have Dano sperging like a motherfricker overracting.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >overracting
                lol okay, that's totally not what losers do when their reality gets shattered. People have freakouts like that, anon. I have seen Dano's full range and he was not overacting. Pattinson is a lesser actor, but he had a good reaction with the "He doesn't know it's me" twist because of how fast he turned the tables, which let Dano take control of the scene but not dominate it.

                I can't recall a single scene from MCU/DCEU that captures that intensity between two morally opposed psychos. Not even Ledger's Joker had that level of chemistry with Bale. The only reason Dano didn't match Phoenix is because Dano was hardly in the movie.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >Not even Ledger's Joker had that level of chemistry with Bale.
                Man, you're fricking tripping.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Ledger is a better actor than Dano, but he didn't play off Bale as well as Dano did Pattinson. That might just be the Batman/Joker dynamic not translating as well to the big screen in individual scenes, though.

                I'm sorry that Dano BTFO your favorite capeshit dynamic in the span of five minutes, but that's how it goes. Purist adaptations always translate poorly between mediums.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >Not even Ledger's Joker had that level of chemistry with Bale.
                Might be the worst take I've seen on this board and that's saying something.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                They came off as separate walls in their individual interactions, not as clashing forces. There was a connection between them about violence, but no mutual charisma. Ledger just outshined Bale in every scene. That's what overacting really is. And he died for it too lol

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                thats nolans frigid directing. i feel the same about the dano-pattinson scene, they feel like theyre in the same room. also pattinson weighing his manipulation on dano is very subtle but effective too.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >they feel like theyre in the same room
                I could not agree more. There's a wall between them, but they're close enough psychologically to stab a dagger in the other's heart. And then you get that moment of clarity "He's the only one we didn't get" and Dano instantly becomes the clear villain. Predictable, maybe. I wasn't trying to think too hard about an off-brand Batman movie. But I definitely perked up during the Batman/Riddler confrontation.

                That and the Penguin being low-key hilarious.
                >AM I THE ONLY PERSON WHO KNOWS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN EL AND LA?
                While also being low-key woke.

                Anon is the kind of guy who buys the hype and gets all worked up for a movie, then rewatches it and realizes it was shit.

                I saw it once and this is why I liked it. I rewatch a lot of things, but this isn't one of them

                >But the acting in that scene was phenomenal.
                It was very clear Dano was given zero direction beyond 'act weird!' or 'act moronic' and just phoned it. He looked visibly frustrated during the reshot scenes.

                Who gives a shit what about behind-the-scenes?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Anon is the kind of guy who buys the hype and gets all worked up for a movie, then rewatches it and realizes it was shit.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >But the acting in that scene was phenomenal.
              It was very clear Dano was given zero direction beyond 'act weird!' or 'act moronic' and just phoned it. He looked visibly frustrated during the reshot scenes.

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    rn watching that joker scene. whats with the aspect ratio, is that native imax? the crazy bokeh tells me it is, but just to be sure.

    i dont watch capeshit but that whole scene looks very good.

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The DCEU cast are mostly incredibly shitty people, and they're basically all miscast, but somehow they work out when Zack is producing if not directing. It's really weird the effect the Snyders have on certain people

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The right scene was good.
    You just expected to get something else and called what you got shit based on nothing.

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Snydershills are truly something else

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      People didn't audibly laugh at Snyder's films in the theater.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        What scene from The Batman got the biggest laugh at your theatre? For me it was the guy with bomb collar and a phone taped to his hand.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I actually left the theater about 45 minutes into the film, so I probably missed the biggest laugh moments like Riddler's spazz attack, but people giggled at the reveal of Riddler at the beginning of the film. He looks so stupid with his gimp mask just standing there trying to be ominous.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          My friend didn't see the trailers.
          She burst out laughing at the I am Vengeance scene.

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I thoguht the new batman was decent. I kind of was actually interested in finding out who the rat was and evyerhting , i normally dont really give a shit about the plot in these movies

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    if you watched left or right unironically, you could die right now and the world wouldn't miss you.
    you are worthless.

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    okay watched both scenes, and both work. also both leagues above marvel shit.

    my problem is with the interrogatory, dano was good, the batman seems like he runs out of acting halfway. the music was way too obvious, should have used something else.

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The Batman was the best superhero movie I’ve seen.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >The Batman was the best superhero movie I’ve seen.
      ESLs need to leave

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    IMDB scores
    >Batman Begins(2005) - 8.2
    >The Dark Knight(2008) - 9.0
    >The Dark Knight Rises(2012) - 8.4
    >Batman vs Superman(2016) - 6.4
    >Suicide Squad(2016) - 5.9
    >Birds of Prey(2020) - 6.0
    >The Suicide Squad(2021) - 7.2
    >The Batman(2022) - 7.9

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >IMpajeet
      worthless

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        The only film on there that was unduly criticized was BvS. The rest are accurate.

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Batman sucks shit. I'll never watch that movie again.

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    OP, this is one of, if not the worst fricking take I've ever had the displeasure of reading. It's seeing posts like these that make me want to leave this site forever and never look back on the moronation that festers here.
    Genuinely, unironically believing that Jared Fricking Leto gives a better performance in a CG scene than two actors who can actually act is embarrassing.
    You have shit taste and I don't know if it can ever be cured.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Genuinely, unironically believing that Jared Fricking Leto gives a better performance in a CG scene than two actors who can actually act is embarrassing.
      He did.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >a MoThEr? A fAtHeR? An AdOpTeD SoN?
        Frick off Sneederpajeet. You're not convincing because even the absolute lowest of the low scum on this planet would have fricking taste and the common sense to know that Leto butchers that entire fricking shitshow of a scene.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >>a MoThEr? A fAtHeR? An AdOpTeD SoN?
          Better acting than NOOOOOO NOOOOOO WHAAAAAAAAAAAAA

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Yes. I've worked with autistic kids my whole life and that's exactly how they act when they break down. It's clear that's what Riddler was and it was executed perfectly.
            Leto, beyond being given the direction to "act kooky" speaks with the respectable confidence of an MCR song and behaves like someone trying too hard to make an impact.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              So shit character acted moronic and that's brilliant because...? Despite same moron being able to easily kill several high profile people single handedly.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Great character acted moronic because imagine being mentally ill and basing your entire crusade on a figure that rejects you in your prime moment? Being socially unskilled and mental would result in that reaction, not some calculated, cold reply that normie cinema would portray.

                For a mocking gesture? Yes. Joker is whimsical and flamboyant in that scene. As he is supposed to be.

                >Whimsical
                >Flamboyant
                Neither of those, but definitely not fricking whimsical. It's cringe and bizarre acting that has nothing to do with the character unlike Riddler's reaction which is set up by him being fricking unstable and clearly ill.
                Who is Leto's Joker? What is he like? Why would he reply like this? Who knows? He only got ten minutes of screentime in Suicide Squad and what we got was shit.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >Great character acted moronic because imagine being mentally ill and basing your entire crusade on a figure that rejects you in your prime moment?
                The Riddler in the movie is capable of kidnapping, assassinating, and creating death traps as if he was 47 Agent, but then he turns into a fricking random moron just because the movie now needs to hit the audience with a hammer with its woke message that vigilante justice is bad mkay, and white lonely guys are like dangerous mkay.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >you must be a sane chad in order to build things to torture people with and Riddler was suddenly not a sane chad and that made me sad
                not the dude you're arguing with, but that's a shit fricking take and anyone who isn't disabled could refute it

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Do you see random Cinemaphilener morons physically taking down chief of polices, mayors, or DAs out there? Or building complex death traps and getting away with it?

                That shit doesn't happen. The best they can do is randomly shoot up schools and such.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                he didn't get away with it
                and yes, morons take out political figures
                once again, shit take

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                You cant complain "shit like that doesn't happen" when its about a man in a bat suit who tries to prevent a city from being flooded.

                You should just stop watching media all together.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                So i can't complain about characters not making sense in a movie that tries to sell itself as gritty and realistic as fricking Seven?

                Two pictures. One of the mayor, one of the commissioner.
                Both are taken from "high above" angle. So, that's any building taller than the Iceberg Lounge? They have to check every building during the beginning of the investigation?
                I know how it ends, but if we're thinking through the characters, they don't. So if they are stupid enough to do what you say they should do, all they have to go on is to search every place near the Iceberg Lounge that is taller than the Iceberg Lounge because someone could've taken a photo from there.
                How are you not getting this?

                Two pictures too many and the characters and the movie itself is moronic for not doing the obvious every viewer is thinking about. Throughout the whole movie i kept questioning myself why Batman wasn't investigating the building, or where the materials for the elaborate deathtraps could have come from, or the website Riddler was posting in, and the answer for all that is because the movie was fricking dumb as shit and the director needed the plot to follow as the way it did for the "cool" factor.

                This movie was dumber than Venom 2, and that was dumb as shit.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                You just can't fathom why the building thing is stupid so we'll move past that.
                >elaborate deathtraps
                He built them tard. Batman needed to track materials such as "pipes" and "duct tape"?
                >website
                I doubt that was a domain Riddler made. It seemed like a Cinemaphile type site. So what would be the point of tracking the origin of the website's maker? You'll no doubt say, "He should've tracked Riddler!" but Riddler probably used some sort of system jammer, and at this point in his career, it's clear Batman doesn't have all the technological resources. That's why we watch him grow.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >So what would be the point of tracking the origin of the website's maker?
                They would at the very least be able to know what Riddler and his followers were planning.

                The movie is dumb and so is you.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Tracking the location of the website owner would lead them to Riddler's plan?
                Are you fricking stupid?
                >so is you
                Oh. You are.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >Tracking the location of the website owner would lead them to Riddler's plan?
                They could keep an eye on the website and see the posters planning the fricking attack. They could trace the IP. They could investigate the video or images. They could do a number of things that real police do. Even police in stupid serial crime shows do.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >and at this point in his career, it's clear Batman doesn't have all the technological resources.
                Dude made contacts capable of recording image and sound, please.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >HOW SHE SUFFERED SO!!!
            you do have shit taste if you think leto did good

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              For a mocking gesture? Yes. Joker is whimsical and flamboyant in that scene. As he is supposed to be.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Genuinely, unironically believing that Jared Fricking Leto gives a better performance in a CG scene than two actors who can actually act is embarrassing.
      My greatest pleasure in life is watching losers like you scoff at these takes only to adopt them a few years later once it's safe to do so. Pathetic weak behavior.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >My greatest pleasure in life is watching losers like you scoff at these takes only to adopt them a few years later once it's safe to do so. >Pathetic weak behavior.
        As if your braindead fricking take is worth "adopting". That shit should be aborted, not adopted. Your take isn't intelligent, nor is it valuable. It comes from the minds of the same homosexuals who make scam calls.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >That shit should be aborted

  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >I drink your milkshake! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!111111111

  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    except Reeves film felt like reading a Batman comic while Snyder's felt like sitting through fanfic that wasn't worth reading...

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >except Reeves film felt like reading a Batman comic
      One that was written by a hack?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        nah one that was written by someone who finally understood the character more than Nolan
        say "hack" all you want it doesn't make it true

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >nah one that was written by someone who finally understood the character more than Nolan
          >Batman is dumb
          >Batman wears invincible armor
          >Batman isn't stealthy
          >Batman doesn't know how to fight
          >Batman only goes after petty crime
          >Batman doesn't know corruption exists
          >Batman kills
          Great understanding.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Batman is dumb
            Quite the opposite. He solves every riddle and only lets the final clue slip his mind because he thinks Riddler knows his identity. He was incredibly smart.
            >Wears invincible armor
            No. The film clearly shows it degrading throughout the runtime. From bullets to the bridge, the suit shows wear and tear until it is finally broken by the shotgun blast. But you'd have to have basic comprehension skills to have spotted that.
            >Batman isn't stealthy
            Intro scene, Batmobile reveal, final entrance into the Iceberg Lounge, elevator with goons. That's plenty of stealthy bat.
            >Batman doesn't know how to fight.
            He certainly does. He takes out every opponent he faces physically. Even the one Catwoman took out at first is stopped officially by him.
            >Batman only goes after petty crime
            Obviously not if he got Joker in Year One
            >Batman doesn't know corruption exists
            Why should he after only one year as Batman?
            >Batman kills
            He does not. Not one death. The pileup in the car chase is caused by Penguin and there's no proof of casualties and there's no other instance of him killing.
            It is a great understanding. I'm glad we agree.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              I am not going to read that wall of text, you homosexual. Batman couldn't solve shit and didn't even know proper Spanish despite being a rich kid. The movie was fricking moronic and the characters nonsensical.

              Take that jail scene. The Riddler says that he needed Batman because Batman was his muscle while he was the mind behind the operation, but throughout the whole movie the Riddler is the one personally attacking everyone physically without any issue. He's never shown as physically incapable or weak. Batman also never helps him other than falling for the traps like a fricking moron. There is not rapport between the characters. There is not even a good reason for why the Riddler cares so much about the Batman other than the movie needing Batman to (failing) solve the riddlers.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Of course you didn't read it. Many people avoid facing their downfall head-on.
                He knew the Spanish was wrong, and you not knowing that proves your observational incompetence. Alfred had told him previously but he went down another route of investigation.
                He needed Batman's physicality when it came to leading people in the right places at the right time. He could handle killing fat politicians because anyone could, but when it came to actual physical threats he needed Batman's help.
                Batman accidentally helped him several times by going down wrong avenues of investigation and buying him time for his plan to pan out. The reason Riddler cares so much about Batman is because his vigilantism inspired his vigilantism.
                Once again, it requires observation. Which is something you lack.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >He needed Batman's physicality as a tour guide
                LMAO

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Dude, give up. The movie is Laws & Order: Special Victims Unit levels of moronic. In any decent crime movie the following pic would have happened and that would be it.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                That's the stupidest argument that chuds on this site continue to push forward as if it contains intellectual merit.
                >let's look at every single building next to the crime scene because there's no way someone simply went on top of a building on some random night and took a photo. He must live somewhere near there!
                That's truly grasping for straws.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >>let's look at every single building next to the crime scene because there's no way someone simply went on top of a building on some random night and took a photo.
                The movie literally shows you the Riddler at that same fricking building watching down the club at several points throughout the movie.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Why are you this moronic? You posted an image in which the characters were speaking, I refuted the image also through the perspective of the characters. Therefore, the information they would have regarding this avenue of investigation is to look through random buildings, since they don't know Riddler lives and operates out of one building.
                You're wasting my fricking time at this point if that's where your argument is at.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                The image exist because the movie shows us the characters getting a bunch of pictures of high-profile people leaving the club and all the pictures are from the same vantage point: a building across the club.
                If this was fricking Bourch or something Detective Bourch would have checked the building out.
                Later the movie keeps showing you that same building and Riddler standing there at the window as a gotcha miss-and-you-see-it. Then later Batman learns the Riddler was always in that building planning his next big attack. He fricking kills Falcone from that bulding, for frick's sake.

                The movie is just too fricking moronic.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Two pictures. One of the mayor, one of the commissioner.
                Both are taken from "high above" angle. So, that's any building taller than the Iceberg Lounge? They have to check every building during the beginning of the investigation?
                I know how it ends, but if we're thinking through the characters, they don't. So if they are stupid enough to do what you say they should do, all they have to go on is to search every place near the Iceberg Lounge that is taller than the Iceberg Lounge because someone could've taken a photo from there.
                How are you not getting this?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                STOP FIGHTING THESE FRICKING IDIOTS
                You're wasting your time and this thread will be up forever if you keep trying to explain shit

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >They have to check every building during the beginning of the investigation?
                They would have spent less time investigating every building in front of the club than whatever moronic shit they did, where all their information came from some random and convenient as frick thug Catwoman kidnapped.

                Shit movie for morons who think they are smart.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                He was a cop. A cop who was directly involved with everything.
                You are the moron. You try to dispute a film you didn't even understand. They would need warrants to search all of those buildings. The film took place over a week. In that corrupt system, it would take more than a week to get those warrants.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >They would need warrants to search all of those buildings.
                >Batman
                >needing warrant
                >despite clocking cops and escaping murderous cops

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >you need a warrant to ask landlords for their cooperation.
                ???

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      This but the opposite

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        oooooh, what comic is that accurately adapting!
        oh shit. it's made up claptrap? damn...

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Snyder already gave us the most comic accurate batsuit he earned the right to experiment a bit.
          Also that knightmare look became so iconic they included it in the comics.
          https://www.cbr.com/batman-v-superman-knightmare-dc-comics-canon/

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Pattinson's is more comic accurate than that.
            Best thing about it is the cowl. Rest is cheap duct tape with a rectangle in the center.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >Pattinson's is more comic accurate than that.
              How when he looks like a Metal Gear Solid character and is invincible?

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >Pattinson's is more comic accurate than that.
              Are you moronic? How is armor plated tacticool shit more comics accurate?
              Afflecks is literally ripped directly from TDKR minus the undies. Which comic is Pattinsons suit from?

  17. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Warner hasn't even announced a sequel for the Batman.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Yes they did.

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *