How is this movie any different from capeshit?

>Hero can apparently do no wrong
>Hero's instincts are always right
>Hero almost on the verge of losing until miraculously rescued
>Through self-belief, hero defeats villain despite huge odds stacked against him

I could go on and on, the entire plot of this movie was unrealistic from the get go.

  1. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    >how is this movie any different from capeshit
    Because it's good and I like it.

  2. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    only fags like that shit

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      yellow minuscule clawlike fingers typed this

  3. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    >how is this movie any different from capeshit
    hero is a straight white male

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      So who was the hero in Captain america : first avenger?

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        I dont know, I dont watch capeshit

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Like Thor, GotG, every Spiderman, Dr Strange, Iron Man, Captain America, Ant Man and Loki?

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        Dr Strange is gay, chud

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        Half of them are gnomish

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          Literally only RDJ and Rudd. More like 20%.

  4. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    It is capeshit, like every good blockbuster it is considered a Marvel movie to normies

  5. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Hero constantly fucks up. Crashed superjet. Puts people in risky situations. Has social and behavioural and mental issues. Literally the only thing he's good at is flying and that's only because of 30 years experience.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Crashed superjet.
      Was it an F-35? Because that's pretty unfair of you, unlimited American taxpayer monies are lucky to keep 20% of those things in the air.
      It's like blaming the pilot when an Osprey crashes and kills everyone.

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        no, some experimental Aurora class black project from area 51 conspiracy

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          And it's totally pointless. There's no reason not to bring the SR-71 out of retirement for one last ride. Plus, I totally would have pissed and shit and jizzed all over myself in excitement if they put a Blackbird on the screen instead of some scifi bullshit.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            >And it's totally pointless. There's no reason not to bring the SR-71
            These films exist to promote the next big USAF budget ask, they are already chomping to replace the horrendously expensive F-35 with a hawt new advanced jet.

            • 4 months ago
              Anonymous

              That is the way the US military has worked for years. Get one new aircraft out the door and immediately begin development on the next. The development cycle is so long by the time you finish the old aircraft has already reached half of its service life.

              Or something something military industrial comple .

              • 4 months ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah but now you can have 500% cost overruns, end up with a product that works only 20% of the time, and everyone just shrugs and starts working on the next generation.
                In the good old days the loss of a Shuttle or two would bring the entire project to a halt.

              • 4 months ago
                Anonymous

                >That is the way the US military has worked for years.
                That is probably why the US has the best jets.

              • 4 months ago
                Anonymous

                It has a lot to do with having a military budget comparable to the rest of the globe combined more than anything.

            • 4 months ago
              Anonymous

              lol you are a bit behind, the prototype for the Next Generation Air Dominance/F35 replacement has already flown back in 2020. Now they are trying to get money to replace the F16, seeing as they finally realised that the F35 is too expensive to replace it as they had previously advertised.

              • 4 months ago
                Anonymous

                Were the F-16/F-18s the last great American fighter jets? Ones that didn't require an intravenous drip of billions to keep airworthy?

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Sounds like Tony Stark lmao

  6. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    >How is this movie any different from capeshit?
    It has practical effects and good cinematography, and there's no quips every five minutes.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      >It has practical effects
      It's mostly CGI, say 90%. I was lured to believe it would be real shots like in the good old days, but it wasn't.

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        I won't deny that there is CGI, but a good chunk of it was done with practical. It felt real enough to me minus the stuff that was harder to pull off like explosions, etc.

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          Some cockpit shots ok (but not all), and most if not all the aerial scenes were definitely CGI.

  7. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    >REEEEEEEEEE

    I WANT TO HATE EVERYTHING

    Touch grass gay.

  8. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Wow you've just described every hollywood movie ever. Congrats, op.

  9. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Who cares? It was kino

  10. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    if it was capeshit there would be
    >more quips
    >set up for another sequel
    >90% more cgi
    >shitty camerawork

    >>Hero can apparently do no wrong
    he trashes a jet at the beginning. also they repeat a lot in the movie that he fucks up constantly but ice man keeps saving his ass from being demoted.
    he definitely makes less mistakes than in the first movie because his character he has grown up

    >>Through self-belief, hero defeats villain despite huge odds stacked against him
    it's supposed to be an heroic film, did you know capeshit didn't invent that, right?

    still a solid 8/10 film

  11. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    He literally gets fired in the first 15min for going too far and only got bailed out because his best buddy is a four star admiral.

  12. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Hero can apparently do no wrong
    Just like Tom Cruise ?

  13. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    That's Tom Cruise's life though.

  14. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    >You hated Top Gun: Maverick
    >You hated the Northman
    >You hated Everything Everywhere All at Once
    >You masturbated to Doctor Strange 2
    I know your game.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      This, is easy to notice the pattern.

  15. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Makes Capeshitters and Soiwars babies cry in desperation
    >BTFOs twittertrannies
    >Makes chinkoids and Vlads seethe in agony
    >The cocky white male saves the day
    >garden gnomes and democrats seething about muh "enlistment movie"
    >Makes sexist jokes that are validated trough the film
    >Movie makes a Cruisillion dollars at the box office and all normal non-deranged people loves it

    Can't Bruise the Cruise!!

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Absolutely based, this film is the ultimate litmus test for if you’re a gay ass chud or not.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Why do morons hate this movie so much?

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        He's right though, it's like claiming the Jurassic sequels captured the same magic as the original.

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        It’s a high t movie. Low test betas need not apply.

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        I don't care what a black women thinks about top gun it wasn't made for you.

        Brie Larson.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous
    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Went to watch this last Friday. Nary a nignog or a chud in sight.

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        Why do morons hate this movie so much?

        Are blacks retarded ?

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      CAN'T BRUISE THE CRUISE

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      If chinks hate it, it's based and I'll watch it. Fuck chinks.

  16. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    >when the hero is an actual good guy and not a morally grey fuck up

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Maverick was always an arrogant, childish bastard who's greatest challenge was overcoming his feelings of guilt over killing his best friend with his ass-headed antics.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      This is good though

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      It’s the midwit cycle. They think they’re being intelligent and counter culture when the current culture is constantly churning out the slop they want. We get a rare callback to 80s kino and they seethe because it’s “below” them.

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        >We get a rare callback to 80s kino
        Hollywood has churned out ENDLESS sequels and reboots of 80's action-shit.
        The original Top Gun was competently made Hollywood formulaic military propaganda. You're just pissed because your Mother's drug and alcohol abuse kept you from reaching up to midwit status.

  17. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    most movies are barely different from a comic plot. its why its fucking retarded when some people use the "good guy always win in the end" argument to say why its bad. most movies have the hero winning. there have been ten mission impossible movies and I dont recall cruise losing in a single one. at least the mcu had thanos winning in one movie. thats more than other franchises can say in terms of letting the bad guy win

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Starlord loses his father and dad as the cost of saving the galaxy, the movie ends on a somber note. Cruise movies typically end with the reaffirmation that Tom(s character) is teh greatest who evar lived.

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        If we're going by that logic then Tom Cruise's character lost his wingman Goose in the first movie and that fucked him up mentally, he spends the rest of the movie trying to overcome this tragedy. And then the guilt comes back to him again in the sequel with Goose's son and again he spends the entire movie trying to overcome this guilt and be in good terms with Goose's son. The protagonist is far from having it easy.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      >at least the mcu had thanos winning in one movie
      In the first part of a two-parter movie.

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        Strange Fails pretty thoroughly in the latest one, he gets a ton of sorcerors killed, the Book of Vishanti destroyed, and Earth only survives because the antagonist has a moment of self-realization and commits sudoku. And now Strange is corrupted by dark alien magics as a result and never managed to "get the girl" in any reality.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      >at least the MCU had Thanos winning in one movie. Y'know unlike other franchises...

      Are you mentally disabled?

  18. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    There's no better evidence of capeshit sapping people's imaginations than their insistence to supplant the term 'action adventure blockbuster' with 'Marvel/Superhero-like'

  19. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Forrest Gump with planes?

  20. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's not based on comic books? Because for me that's the difference between capeshit and any other blockbuster.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Is Hancock capeshit? Is The Incredibles capeshit?
      What about A History of Violence or The Road to Perdition?

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        those film are based on comic-books...

        If ' based on a comic' meant being a direct adaptation than the entire MCU would be disqualified from the term

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          Hancock and Incredibles are NOT based on comic books.
          Road and History are.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            Do you seriously think that the incredibles is not based around the comic book genre, simply because it's not an adaptation?

            • 4 months ago
              Anonymous

              >the comic book genre
              There are at least a dozen genres published in the form of comic books.

            • 4 months ago
              Anonymous

              Comic books aren't a genre.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            Adaptation =/= based on a comic

  21. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    It was kino and making little dick asians seethe to their absolute core is just an added bonus. Consider this revenge for your bbc posting chang

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      shut up moron lover

  22. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Do you guys think AI could replace pilots in the future?

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Guided missiles and drones practically have already. Ask Russian tank drivers.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yes.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      not entirely but yeah I can see A.I. and drones piloted from a persons desk doing a large chunk of the work one day. you might want a couple man piloted planes out there but really only in low numbers.

  23. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    because it doesn't have space aliens and magic in it you moron

  24. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    all actors literary experiencing 7g while acting
    no cgi with the exception of 5gen figheers, explosions and anti air launchers . great sound effects and soundtrack

  25. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    >I didn't like top gun because it was unrealistic
    Imagine hating fun this much

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      not to mention only america coming up with suecide squad plan is unrealistic, the whole setting is great idea to have excuse for close range fighting
      (planes shooting messiles from beyond visual range is not fun)

  26. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Besides the US government being good and a ~55 yo being able to handle that much G force, it's kinda realistic. Plus the feel is just different: the drama, retro, and macho elements are more fleshed out.

  27. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    it's not filled with gays and strong black womyn and diversity hires
    marvel is for gays and trannies

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      There were black and female pilots though, it just wasn't cringe about it.

  28. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Minimal use of CGI, nothing happened that was inherently impossible

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Minimal use of CGI

  29. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Brainlets will disagree with you but Maverick is definitely an unbeatable superhero. And the movie had tons of CGI too, at least 50% of it, and it's very obvious if you watch the movie. Don't fall for the marketing.

Your email address will not be published.