these homies act like there hasn't been several hundred years of rebuttals to their arguments. there arguments are literally "i can't read, there for i am correct"
I used to watch God's Not Dead while I lied in bed with my ex-girlfriend in her little apartment at college. It's hard to watch now even though years have gone by. I've found another woman and I love her, even dated her longer at this point, but it's not the same. I'll never know the passion that I felt with my first love again, and I guess I'm alright with that. Smile that it happened as they say. Christ, I need a mother fricking drink but I told myself I'd cut down and not drink until the weekend. Lord give me fricking strength. Goddamn it. I quit smoking too.
>everyone that isn't a Christian is a prick, to include Muslims >the main "atheist" antagonist isn't atheist, he just hates God >gets run over by a car and dies after he attempts to repent and change his ways
this movie is a joke
>ok, what evidence do you have for that?
It doesn't matter if there's evidence or not, it can be dismissed just as easily. Realize that if religious people are asking for evidence for other's assertions, they must also be willing to provide evidence for their own. The argument in the OP is disingenuous as it attempts to shift the burden of proof on the atheist. God is a creation of the religious person, not the atheist. So one should ask, why should the atheist attempt to disprove something that the atheist never asserted (God's existence) in the first place?
read again what I wrote you stupid homosexual. these spiritual encounters you have contribute nothing to the spirit that is your nation and serves yourself. you are some pseudo-gnostic at heart if you think spirituality is some gamerscore you accrue individually
>HURRR MUH NATION
Why the frick would i care about corrupt bureaucrats and judges
2 years ago
Anonymous
I mean “nation” as in an immediate community or your distinct “people” - you know, like how your pagan forefathers defined it
2 years ago
Anonymous
Ah the definition christianity stole from paganism and the greeks and romans. I gotcha
2 years ago
Anonymous
>still deflects
gnostics are homosexuals and you have no tether to anyone anon. your “experiences” are only mild delusions in the face of mass ritual and communal mana. your beliefs are just self-isolationist antisocial cope
2 years ago
Anonymous
>willing accepts the thievery of their chosen sect of judaism >still holds it to be the highest ethical source of reason and truth
Cool story bra needs more israelites
I just have one thing to say
The Bible was not written by God, but by the hand of man, so regardless of what the Bible may say about me, and my boyfriend's lifestyle, the real God up in Heaven loves everybody. He doesn't care whether you are gay, or straight for we are all his children, and if by some miracle God doesn't approve of me, or my fricking b***h then quite frankly he is not a God worth worshipping
I read a post somewhere that said when Palestine got a little uppity recently with some stuff in the air, the blacked spam on /b/ and /gif/ stopped for a full day. hahah
It's not possible or necessary to prove the non-existence of something, its lack of existence is proof itself. What you're supposed to prove is the opposite.
No one can disprove that Odin exists, and Allah, and Buddah etc. Christians are the only npcs still too moronic and ignorant to realize they're the only ones left still asking this question as if it's a 'gotcha' on anyone who disagrees with them. Belief in god is mental illness and these NPCs demonstrate that every time they say something they believe is profound.
[...]
There is literally no reason to believe in religion or god when we live in the age of science and technology.
Part of the reason you guys never seem to receive answers to your queries (as the reasonably sufficiently high IQ individuals I assume you to be) is because you are so lost in the sauce that no one, who is even minimally qualified in spiritual matters, can even point you in the general direction of where to find the answers (though the likes of Rene Guenon and Julius Evola are a good start)
So instead you just get basic internet arguments and proselytizing christcucks, all of low IQ, whose ideas you compare to your middleschool understanding of theology (which was about the point you stopped looking into these matters in any greater detail anyway)
I'm not a CS Lewis expert but I can recommend his literary works like "The Problem of Pain". Someone more well read can make a better suggestion for specific books.
Why? God doesnt do shit for you, even if you believe in Him you wont hear from him and go to a sage of Him and they’ll just tell you “we don’t know God’s will/plan”.
Christianity is literally spirituality for the layman/working class. Its philosophy for people with room temp IQ in need of existential insurance. Thats all
All of it my dude. Christian theology has been patchworked over the centuries to just appeal to a majority of people. Nothing particularly fancy, just fulfilling the basic existential needs of the common man.
It adapts to the time its in, thats why its going along with the troony shit, to avoid fading into obscurity
If it's made to be a mass consumed product then it simply isn't Christianity. If they're supporting the transgender agenda then they're so far gone that they're going against scripture, there was a verse that said something like if one has crushed genitals they wont go near the Lord. Read: heresy. However there's millenia worth of literature and philosophy that's beyond this crap and from my limited experience with it, there is nothing in it that is a path of least resistance. It's not easy to be a Christian.
>It adapts to the time its in, thats why its going along with the troony shit, to avoid fading into obscurity
What can I tell you, putting it mildly, Christianity doesn't *need* the transgender mania to survive, it's a lot deeper than that. The heart of Christianity is its mysticism, which is not even on the menu for most of the world. Orthodoxy has its problems but its closer to the root IMO. If your issue with the faith is megapastors and rainbowflags in churches and everything being a mass consumption psyop, then I'm genuinely sorry because there's value to it, beyond the scope of this post and pic rel.
>christians literally believe ethereal sky wizard living on the clouds made this and everything else just cuz
"random" and "divine plan" are literally the same unknowable Incomprehensibe things the fact that you people are bending over backwards trying to differentiate them amuses me to no end
I took a shit that looked just like this a few days ago. What does it mean?
"random" and "divine plan" are literally the same unknowable Incomprehensibe things the fact that you people are bending over backwards trying to differentiate them amuses me to no end
nta but the divine plan as it's called, is not always unknowable. As far as I understand there is a consesus among theologians that taking evil and turning it into good is a large part of God's plan. As far as randomness is concerned, idk how to put it but Brownian motion doesn't equate to meaning that can only be seen in the future, in retrospect. But I don't know what you mean by "random" and "divine plan".
>You believe in god therefore I wil have an epic philosophy debate against you in front of the class and if you don't beat me, a PhD philosopher, you fail the class
Does this really happen in real universities?
You cant prove or disprove God’s existence the discussion is pointless
>t. Kant’s Epistemology.
>pointless
Not if it determines your fate in the next life.
your fate in the next life is determined by your charector and/or your faith, not in what you prove.
It’s impossible to prove what happens after death so yeah, discussion is pointless.
Prove there’s a next life.
There is literally no reason to believe in religion or god when we live in the age of science and technology.
>when we live in the age of science and technology.
that's sufficient reason. pray not to be replaced by an android.
The scientific method is limited in its derivation of knowledge.
Christ is king and until you actually choose faith you haven't ever made a choice and can't even really be called human
>christian using devil's proof "argument"
lol. lmao even.
I have superpowers, I don't have to prove it though. You have to disprove it, right?
literal middle school level understanding of philosophy
these homies act like there hasn't been several hundred years of rebuttals to their arguments. there arguments are literally "i can't read, there for i am correct"
I, personally know god does not exist. Can't prove me wrong.
Why don't you disprove it then :')
You cant fisprove the existenxe of anything. Read and White elephants exist, go ahead, disprove me
Isn't that there that jesus camp movie coming up? that sounds christian
I used to watch God's Not Dead while I lied in bed with my ex-girlfriend in her little apartment at college. It's hard to watch now even though years have gone by. I've found another woman and I love her, even dated her longer at this point, but it's not the same. I'll never know the passion that I felt with my first love again, and I guess I'm alright with that. Smile that it happened as they say. Christ, I need a mother fricking drink but I told myself I'd cut down and not drink until the weekend. Lord give me fricking strength. Goddamn it. I quit smoking too.
>everyone that isn't a Christian is a prick, to include Muslims
>the main "atheist" antagonist isn't atheist, he just hates God
>gets run over by a car and dies after he attempts to repent and change his ways
this movie is a joke
Protestants have a fricked up worldview.
brainlets in this thread think pic related is actually an intelligent statement
How is this not true
shut up
LARPing christgays
It depends on what you consider evidence.
I don't think you know what the word evidence means
I do.
What body of facts are present that prove God to be true
how am I supposed to prove a negative?
>what can be asserted without evidence should be scrutinized without queasiness
that better?
Literally soulless statement
>Literally soulless statement
>what can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
ok, what evidence do you have for that?
>ok, what evidence do you have for that?
It doesn't matter if there's evidence or not, it can be dismissed just as easily. Realize that if religious people are asking for evidence for other's assertions, they must also be willing to provide evidence for their own. The argument in the OP is disingenuous as it attempts to shift the burden of proof on the atheist. God is a creation of the religious person, not the atheist. So one should ask, why should the atheist attempt to disprove something that the atheist never asserted (God's existence) in the first place?
hopefully never, these movies are cringe. if you want Christ-kino just put on a Malick film.
I firmly agree with the statement on the right and I’m a pagan.
cringe, part of what builds “mana” and prevents the depletion of a nation’s virile spirit is the communal aspect of faith (whatever that might be)
>all paganism is cringe asf wicanism
Typical christcuck
During meditations I’ve had encounters with both Norse pagan and Greco-Roman pagan entities.
I firmly believe in the Stoic concept of The Logos
LMAO
>t hasnt had a spiritual experience with a god thats supposedly interpersonal and loves them
>I firmly believe in the Stoic concept of The Logos
Based as frick.
read again what I wrote you stupid homosexual. these spiritual encounters you have contribute nothing to the spirit that is your nation and serves yourself. you are some pseudo-gnostic at heart if you think spirituality is some gamerscore you accrue individually
>HURRR MUH NATION
Why the frick would i care about corrupt bureaucrats and judges
I mean “nation” as in an immediate community or your distinct “people” - you know, like how your pagan forefathers defined it
Ah the definition christianity stole from paganism and the greeks and romans. I gotcha
>still deflects
gnostics are homosexuals and you have no tether to anyone anon. your “experiences” are only mild delusions in the face of mass ritual and communal mana. your beliefs are just self-isolationist antisocial cope
>willing accepts the thievery of their chosen sect of judaism
>still holds it to be the highest ethical source of reason and truth
Cool story bra needs more israelites
Unironically you're both wrong, read Evola lmao
gimme qrd anon, will listen later. all I’ve heard about evola is sex magick sperg outs
>ripping off agnostic arguments
do christkeks really?
I just have one thing to say
The Bible was not written by God, but by the hand of man, so regardless of what the Bible may say about me, and my boyfriend's lifestyle, the real God up in Heaven loves everybody. He doesn't care whether you are gay, or straight for we are all his children, and if by some miracle God doesn't approve of me, or my fricking b***h then quite frankly he is not a God worth worshipping
Why can't atheists define atheism?
>>>/b/
lol.
Believe it or not, that spam is still going, 10 years strong.
Too bad /b/ is just a fricking dumpster fire of porn and forced cancer that it goes unnoticed
I read a post somewhere that said when Palestine got a little uppity recently with some stuff in the air, the blacked spam on /b/ and /gif/ stopped for a full day. hahah
They’re not. It’s just Christians that post here suck at communicating because they’re LARPing zoomers wanting to be trad
It's not possible or necessary to prove the non-existence of something, its lack of existence is proof itself. What you're supposed to prove is the opposite.
How long until we stop getting homosexual bait threads about religion.
No one can disprove that Odin exists, and Allah, and Buddah etc. Christians are the only npcs still too moronic and ignorant to realize they're the only ones left still asking this question as if it's a 'gotcha' on anyone who disagrees with them. Belief in god is mental illness and these NPCs demonstrate that every time they say something they believe is profound.
Part of the reason you guys never seem to receive answers to your queries (as the reasonably sufficiently high IQ individuals I assume you to be) is because you are so lost in the sauce that no one, who is even minimally qualified in spiritual matters, can even point you in the general direction of where to find the answers (though the likes of Rene Guenon and Julius Evola are a good start)
So instead you just get basic internet arguments and proselytizing christcucks, all of low IQ, whose ideas you compare to your middleschool understanding of theology (which was about the point you stopped looking into these matters in any greater detail anyway)
>qualified in spiritual matters
>still can't answer
CHRIST. IS. LORD.
>CHRIST. IS. LORD.
Lord of Flies
>myth
lmao christ's existence has already been proven
I see your Talmud and raise you a Rev 3:9
Uh.... excuse me chuddy... but christ WAZ KANGZ...
Science is literally the human interpretation of laws deigned by God to govern our universe
pssh...christian c*cks...
>6c6.jpg
Anyone who's taken a philosophy course can see right through that bullshit
Is this the one in which the christians leave the atheist dude to die after getting run over? Isn't that a form of extremely cruel euthanasia?
i wish i could get myself to believe in god
I'm not a CS Lewis expert but I can recommend his literary works like "The Problem of Pain". Someone more well read can make a better suggestion for specific books.
Why? God doesnt do shit for you, even if you believe in Him you wont hear from him and go to a sage of Him and they’ll just tell you “we don’t know God’s will/plan”.
Christianity is literally spirituality for the layman/working class. Its philosophy for people with room temp IQ in need of existential insurance. Thats all
>existential insurance
you're talking about American TV Christianity there, well said
All of it my dude. Christian theology has been patchworked over the centuries to just appeal to a majority of people. Nothing particularly fancy, just fulfilling the basic existential needs of the common man.
It adapts to the time its in, thats why its going along with the troony shit, to avoid fading into obscurity
If it's made to be a mass consumed product then it simply isn't Christianity. If they're supporting the transgender agenda then they're so far gone that they're going against scripture, there was a verse that said something like if one has crushed genitals they wont go near the Lord. Read: heresy. However there's millenia worth of literature and philosophy that's beyond this crap and from my limited experience with it, there is nothing in it that is a path of least resistance. It's not easy to be a Christian.
>It adapts to the time its in, thats why its going along with the troony shit, to avoid fading into obscurity
What can I tell you, putting it mildly, Christianity doesn't *need* the transgender mania to survive, it's a lot deeper than that. The heart of Christianity is its mysticism, which is not even on the menu for most of the world. Orthodoxy has its problems but its closer to the root IMO. If your issue with the faith is megapastors and rainbowflags in churches and everything being a mass consumption psyop, then I'm genuinely sorry because there's value to it, beyond the scope of this post and pic rel.
>athiests literally believe this is just random
natural selection is the opposite of random. the opposite.
Evolution is just a theory.
>Evolution is just a theory.
Just like god then lmao
God is less than a theory. He’s not even a hypothesis lmao
Religion is just a convenient delusion.
you're putting the cart before the horse
what you call "natural selection" is only made possible by the miracle of life in the first place
>christians literally believe ethereal sky wizard living on the clouds made this and everything else just cuz
"random" and "divine plan" are literally the same unknowable Incomprehensibe things the fact that you people are bending over backwards trying to differentiate them amuses me to no end
nta but the divine plan as it's called, is not always unknowable. As far as I understand there is a consesus among theologians that taking evil and turning it into good is a large part of God's plan. As far as randomness is concerned, idk how to put it but Brownian motion doesn't equate to meaning that can only be seen in the future, in retrospect. But I don't know what you mean by "random" and "divine plan".
I took a shit that looked just like this a few days ago. What does it mean?
I miss when the internet was just 78 page long christian vs atheist flame war threads
Me too bro. Simpler times
>You believe in god therefore I wil have an epic philosophy debate against you in front of the class and if you don't beat me, a PhD philosopher, you fail the class
Does this really happen in real universities?
Can I get a movie starring Archangel Michael, please?
Can we skip the Prophecy recc? Aside from Viggo's performance it's not much to look at.