How many problems would Batman solve if he just killed the Joker?

How many problems would Batman solve if he just killed the Joker?

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I have a better idea...

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Gotham would make a holiday after that and Batman would be a national hero.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        their version of Gandalf raping day

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The DC Universe would magically make up some bullshit to frick up Batman.

      >For God's sake no. Even if I somehow held it together long enough to molest that pasty white ass, I could never look at myself the same way. I so wished that I could hurt him in ways that only he be hurt. Even after 5 rounds and a wig, I couldn't bring myself to do it. I'm afraid that if I slip my dick into that skinny unwashed butthole, I could never return.

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >How many problems would Batman solve if he just killed the Joker?

    None. Batman doesn't kill isn't because of restraint — it's trauma. Matter of fact, him not killing keeps him from going further into insanity.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Who cares, we won't have any fun stories if he killed him, these are never ending characters moron.

      Why can you autists never use your imagination and answer a simple question.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >moron OP seethes that his totally "original" question is not answered to his liking

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Not the OP, I just see posts like these every time a hypothetical question is given and it is tiring.

          You're the autist who doesn't understand it doesn't matter anyways cuz these stories will never end.

          It's a "What-If", I doubt OP is Bendis who's gonna take your thoughts to heart and include them in a mainline Batman run. What's wrong with just thinking about a what-if scenario.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            fine I'll bite if it makes you feel better. It would solve a ton of fricking issues where modern joker is concerned. The frick that Batman doesn't at very least allow Jason to just do it and take the burden of killing off his shoulders is non sense to me. But trying to make sense of Cape Comics is like trying to tell your mother not to slob on my knob. It's a pointless endeavor. Better?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >the fact that batman
              >nonsense
              was gonna bother me if I didn't correct myself.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >The frick that Batman
              Heh.
              >But trying to make sense of Cape Comics
              Why do that to yourself? Why not just have casual fun with reading cape stuff like you're usually meant to. If you over analyze a genre like this you won't gain much fun out of it, that's just what I think though, thanks for sharing your thoughts anon.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Why do that to yourself?
                I don't thats my point, as much as I don't like mass killer joker I don't sit around and speculate what would be different if he would just kill him. I enjoy cape for what it is.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        You're the autist who doesn't understand it doesn't matter anyways cuz these stories will never end.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        As soon as Batman kills joker, everyone turns on Batman. They see him as the crazy one now and gordon or anyone that knows his no kill will never trust him , BECASUE it was the joker he did in.

        Birth of the bat in the abyss.

        I got you

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Who cares, we won't have any fun stories if he killed him, these are never ending characters moron.

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    or...OR people can stop the joker wank, and reel it the frick back with the killing he does.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Joker a villain who rarely kills and not physical threat at all like 70's to 90's till later 90's really changed shit.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I always thought it would be cool if the Joker had a No-Kill rule like the Batman in a twisted mirror sort of way.

        Also removes the issue of the genocide level of murders he'd have when caught.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Likely none, given the point of comics is the fantastic conflicts, Joker's death would likely just lead to something filling his vacuum.

          That might actually be funny make Joker gas really excruciating though. The idea of it just being absolutely a horrible ordeal as a kid fricked me up for a while.

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Many. So many.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    1.

    The Joker

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Well joker himself would no longer be able to commit crimes, but I’m sure he’d have copycat killers, plus all batmans other rogues would still exist

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    All

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    None
    There’s always another reboot

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The most comprehensive, up-to-date list (going up to July 2021) totalled Joker as having murdered 3051 people onscreen in canon as of 2 years ago
    https://listofdeaths.fandom.com/wiki/The_Joker_(Kill_Count)
    So 3051 problems

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    None. There's just one more killer out in the world.

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >implying Joker wouldn't just come back to life whether by lazarus pit, cloning, necromancy, or any of the other fricktillion reasons he's come back despite seemingly dying a brutal hideous death

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      None of those have happened except the lazarus pit, and that was because BRUCE put him in the lazarus pit. Joker has never died once in canon.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Detective Comics #64
        >June, 1942
        >The Joker decides to surrender himself to the Gotham City Police Department and confesses all his past crimes. The list is too long and the penalty for him is death. Sentenced to die in the electric chair, Joker complies and soon he is officially declared dead. However, this was all just a ruse and soon, the Joker is taken out of the morgue by some of his henchmen and revived with a special serum.

        >The Joker is now free to roam the streets once again without fear of being taken to jail, since he was already executed for all his crimes.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Burger laws really!?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Yep. Cause charging a formerly dead man for crimes he's already been executed for would be "double jeopardy". Obviously.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Dick killed the Joker during Last Laugh.
        Legally dead.
        Batman did CPR till he came back.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Last Laugh was not canon and was set on Earth 32

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Last Laugh was a line-wide crossover in the early 00’s, it was 100% canon. Not an elseworld.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              It was moved to Earth Thirty Two afterwards like a few events they wanted to retcon. Said in an omnibus or something.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                How is that even possible? Earth 32 was the Green Lantern Batman earth, for In Darkest Knight.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                The other one, earth Thirty-Two (spelled out)
                https://dc.fandom.com/wiki/Earth-Thirty-Two
                Yes, DC has 2 earth-32s

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    lol

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      WTF.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Died from bofa.

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It'd be better if anyone but Batman killed Joker. Because it would point out the flaws of his philosophy. Showing that sometimes the greater good is killing that which is irredeemably evil.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Jason was wrong. Deal with it.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        No. The only thing Jason did wrong was try to control crime. There was always going to be more infighting & death. Better to put fear in them of actual death over the fear Batman puts in them of just getting punched & maybe arrested.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Jason was just as evil as Joker, if not worse because he’s not even crazy. That’s why Batman beat the shit out of Jason: because he was always a weak and cowardly little b***h and the weakest robin. Killing criminals does nothing, or else Batman should kill Jason and then Jason would be begging for mercy like the little cuck he is

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >just as evil
            He didn't kill any innocent people, children, or cripple a woman for life. I see now you can't even argue in good faith.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Still a killer, picking straws changes nothing. They’re all the same. Jason should be beaten to death by Batman if he wants Batman to take the weak, cowardly way out by killing like Jason wants. Bruce grew up in hell and he still became a true hero. That’s the difference between them: Bruce is a man, and Jason is a weak cowardly little cuckold.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Bruce is a man, and Jason is a weak cowardly little cuckold
                >Refuses to avenge his friends
                >A man

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Jason doesn’t know even half of the suffering Bruce has been through and yet he betrayed Bruce and betrayed all the good that Bruce stood for despite his dark and traumatised past. Jason is weak and pathetic and he stopped being Bruce’s friend the moment he beyrayed him, he was only a pathetic failure.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              So he's punisher

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Magog killed Joker in Kingdome Come and the apocalypse happened because of it. Murder is evil and will always lead you down the wrong path. End of story.

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Jason was always the worst robin. Even Alfred said Jason was always weak and couldn’t fight because he’s a pussy. Alfred would beat the shit out of him in a fight.

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Zero. He'd create a thousand new ones in the copy cat Jokers who would overwhelm Bats and the GCPD with chaos and fatalities.
    Most of the Zodiac killings were not performed by the actual Zodiac killer.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Everyone in Gotham thought Batman killed Joker for a year after Faces of Death.
      There were some small protests but absolutely 0 copycat killers.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >it's an anon thinks a storyline from the past 15 years is relevant episode
        come on bro

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Robin’s Regulars should have been referenced during We Are Robin and the Robin War.
          That or the time Dick ran a summer camp as Robin. Or his official fan club.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            They would all vacate after learning Tim’s a gay

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Would Batman killing the Joker scare the shit out of his rogue's gallery knowing now or at least thinking now they could be next?

    "But Batman never kills..."

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      There's plenty of scenarios where the Joker died and Gotham was still the crime ridden shit hole it was when Joker was still alive. In Universe Batman has his no kill rule because he knows if he kills he'll get a taste for blood and just be another Joker

      Also, because he doesn't want to lose GCPD's support, which is contingent on him not being a murderous vigilante.

      As soon as Batman kills joker, everyone turns on Batman. They see him as the crazy one now and gordon or anyone that knows his no kill will never trust him , BECASUE it was the joker he did in.

      Birth of the bat in the abyss.

      Batman gets hunted down, loses Alfreds respect(maybe giving him a heart attack) this alienates Bruce more where it's deemed by news that Batman not only killed joker but allegedly killed bruce Wayne aswell.
      Batman is now only Batman, fully, have joker haunt him making him more and more unhinged (maybe not that's kinda like Arkham) either way looses some tech or he goes full off grid. Rouges and mobs fear the shit out of him becasue he's full on embraced vengance and the night, basically is a crazy punisher/owlmam in bat cosplay without guns, just a grapple and makeshift batarangs at first, the more unhinged and more villians he kills, he could keep new "trophy's" like 2 faces skull, also could possibly rob the villians he takes out for their tech/tools.
      His new cave becomes amusmemt mile docks or some shit, people think it's haunted, also he covers his mouth now like Cassandra's Batgirl, making him look less human and more knightmareish.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I'ma say Alfred gets put on batman's list too by the news even if he died from a heart attack

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Besides of some stern lectures from the justice league and some angry editorials from some newspapers, I don't see much negative stuff happening if Batman suddenly says "enough" and kills the Joker.
    All of Gotham's underworld would shit it's pants in terror at the idea of having to face a Batman who doesn't hesitate to kill anymore, and even heavy hitters like Ra's al ghul would think twice before crossing their path with Bats.

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    If you kill The Joker you become The Joker.

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Jason makes Batman kill The Joker
    >Batman goes insane from the trauma of what he's done and the cliffedge he's just jumped down
    >Bruce's mind snaps and he becomes The Batman Who Laughs and easily beats Jason to death with his bare fists now that he's no longer holding back
    >tortures the entire Justice League to death, then gains cosmic powers with his genius intelligence and kills the source
    >creates a twisted, evil multiverse of murder just like he's becomes and destroys all of existence
    Well done. You've just doomed all of reality because you wanted Batman to stop being a hero. Well you got what you wanted. Hope you like dying to The Batman Who Laughs.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I've said it before and I'll say it again.
      Batman Who Laughs is a shitty concept that should've stayed a one off.
      It is the height of Batwank.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Seething little supercuck

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          You're assuming that I don't like Batman or something?
          I like both, I just hate it when Batman gets powerwanked, especially in an event as dumb as that one was.
          And for the record, there are plenty of bad Superman stories too.
          But, well, this is a Batman thread.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Seethe. BatChad was always able to beat the shit out of your beta daddy supercuck and make him beg for mercy. That's what happens when you get handed powers for doing nothing and expect to win a fight against someone who trained and worked like hell for his strength. You get your ass fricking kicked.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Got it, you're shitposting and unable to comprehend the fact I like both characters but dislike a certain way of portraying one of them.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              But...all the anti-bats could only beat Superman by using powers that were either handed to them, or required almost no work to get access to.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                It required work to train his intelligence until he could create the Doomsday Virus, work to genetically modify himself until he is atlantean, work to create the nanite alfred body, unlimited willpower to use the green lantern ring better than the entire lantern corps combined, work to use Ares' powers better than Ares himself could.
                And Batkek is just Batman if he stopped always holding back.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Doombat
                The blueprints were literally already laid out for him since Doomsday is a parasite. He could've just done a blood transfusion and obtained his powers.
                >Drowned and Speedbat
                You can make arguments for them working for their powers, but the bullshit that they got alongside said powers required no work to obtain.
                >Alfredbat
                I don't even need to comment on this one.
                >In Darkest Knight Bat
                It did not require unlimited willpower to corrupt the ring, it just required Bruce to mask his anger and hatred as willpower, and that was enough to frick up the lanterns light.
                >Bat of War
                The helm did all of the work. It gave him that power outright, just like how it powered up Ares.
                >Batkek
                That's just Bruce but CUHRAZEE!!! So he had access to the Batforce and the Clownforce, neither of which he had to work for to obtain. Okay I'm shitposting with this one, but he's the only other Bat member aside from Speedbat to actually need to do any sort of thinking.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >batman who laughs
      >skinny dyel
      >beats jason
      lol

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        he already did kill his Jason. and he beat Batman in a fistfight too. Compared to beating Bruce, Batkek would punch Jason once in the snout and he'd start crying like the pussy he is

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    There's plenty of scenarios where the Joker died and Gotham was still the crime ridden shit hole it was when Joker was still alive. In Universe Batman has his no kill rule because he knows if he kills he'll get a taste for blood and just be another Joker

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Also, because he doesn't want to lose GCPD's support, which is contingent on him not being a murderous vigilante.

  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >How many problems would Batman solve if he just killed the Joker?
    Lots, but then Batman would have a bigger problem: how does he justify his existence without a totally fun and entertaining group of bad guys to catch and release?

    He's a billionaire playing vigilante in his spare time. If he wanted to really make an impact on crime he'd donate money to the police but what he really wants is to play-fight with frenemies while he figures out his trauma from watching his parents die.
    Who cares if a few plebs get caught in the cross-fire? They're just poorgays after all

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    2

  24. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    he'd be preventing the deaths of every person the joker was going to go on to kill. 'Slippery slope' arguments are illogical because they assume people lack personal judgement, batman killing the joker doesn't mean he suddenly is going to become a violent psychopath, that's some third-grade writing right there. Batman should be perfectly capable of moderation and judgement and going 'okay, the joker's going to be the one exception', and actually hold by that. And someday, maybe there'd be a second exception. And maybe a third! But the point is that that doesn't mean he's going to suddenly start slitting the throat of someone who is littering.

  25. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    As soon as Batman kills joker, everyone turns on Batman. They see him as the crazy one now and gordon or anyone that knows his no kill will never trust him , BECASUE it was the joker he did in.

    Birth of the bat in the abyss.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Pretty sure in this one-shot Batman goes straight to Gordon and turns himself in.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      That train of thought makes no sense. I'd buy him a drink for doing the right thing.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Then you have joker gang wannabes become bat man wannbees and they are people like you that would like him, these people help Batman hide from police.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >everyone turns on Batman
      yeah, Diana totally gonna be against murder

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        This isn't considering the league but I mean this man has a way to kill or stop all of them already.
        Let's get it.

  26. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The problem isn't Batman not killing the Joker, it's Batman going out of his way to save the Joker's life.

  27. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Anon, I'm going to explain the real reason why Batman doesn't kill the Joker, and to be sure that you understand, I'll explain it in your native language.

    Durr, if Batman kill Joker, durr, writers no can use Joker no more, durr. Durr, Joker popular, durr, Joker sell comics, durr, Joker sell movie tickets, durr, Joker sell merch, durr, no kill goose that lays golden eggs, durr durr durr durr duuuurrrrrrrrrr.

    Do you get it now, or should I try grunts instead?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Even that's not true, Joker could just come back.
      Batman doesn't kill Joker more because they're way up their asses about the No Kill Rule but most writers are too dumb to really write it well so Batman needs to act like a literal moron to make conflict out of something ultimately simple.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >they're way up their asses about the No Kill Rule

        The No Kill Rule exists so they can keep reusing the same old villains, and don't have to create new ones. Look at the Punisher: Frank doesn't have a No Kill Rule, but he can only kill villains either nobody cares about, or who were created for the specific purpose of being killed by Frank. If he tries to kill an A-list villain, he WILL fail.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Even Frank has had his own rogues come back from the dead. Death means fricking nothing. The No Kill Rule exists because it was when Batman was purely trying to appeal to kids but when it got "serious" again they wanted to keep the whole No Kill bullshit as part of his mythos. Batman's villains have died and come back, JOKER has died and come back. Tons of villains die and come back all the fricking time, writers don't see death as an impediment. The No Kill Rule exists purely because people think BATMAN DOESN'T KILL is an important part of his character.

  28. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The only good Joker is TAS Joker.

  29. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >How many problems would Batman solve if he just killed the Joker?
    One. The joker. What kind of fricking stupid question is this?

  30. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    almost all of them. Most of his rogies gallery are only alive because they bring in the sales. The moral code is just a bullshit excuse to explain away why he keeps them around. Even one of the best Batman stories has him admit acknowledge this, and then he finally kills him.

  31. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    If it's not his place to kill the Joker, that's alright with me. But the governments and the law in cape worlds are worse than ours about keeping the scum inside steel bars and burying them into the ground than ours and that's saying something

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      If they could keep villains in prison, it would effectively be the same as the villains dying and staying dead: the villains would no longer be usable.

      Look at it like this: imagine that DC is a daycare, the writers are the kids, and the characters are the toys. All of the kids want a turn playing with the popular toys like Joker, so if one of the kids breaks the popular toy, no one can play with it anymore.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I know the irl reasons for it but it almost makes me want a citizen in a cape world to bomb all the government buildings in revenge for being sinfully and egregiously slothful, after their family member got murdered after some repeat murderer villain escaped prison again 3 months after sentencing

  32. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    A lot of lower tier villains would quit knowing Batman isn't a pacifist anymore.

  33. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    why should batman do it? why haven't one of the police done it? why hasn't the city of gotham signed off on the death penalty and just killed him? Batman has caught that homie so many times now why can't someone else just kill him off while he's in custody or in prison? Nothing about comic books make sense anon. just enjoy

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      LOL right why do they keep sending him to the world's shittiest prison where deranged killers can keep escaping over and over again why don't they ever send him to ADX Florence or something where nobody has ever escaped? Just repeat the MST3K mantra and relax

  34. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    He could him on a wheelchair permanently. Crippled one or both arms. Frick him up good enough and he shouldn't be much of a threat to the public.

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *