How would (You) survive?

How would (You) survive?

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Rape

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I dont know. I didn't watch this movie.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      you should, it's really good

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I live in the woods and only go into town once a month. I would probably miss the entire outbreak.

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >let's frick up settlement and kill hundreds of people because 2 women will get raped
    Believe all women
    Protect all women
    Kill all men

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >soldiers go 3 (three) whole weeks without sex
      >turn into raping murdering psychopaths

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        They were always scum. They only survived the outbreak because they deserted and took over that manor house, definitely murdering whoever was there prior. Eccleston knew his control over them was tenuous at best and that letting them take the girls might keep them cohesive enough to stay together and not start killing eachother. His little speech to Jim is just to assuage his own guilt.

        Either that or the film's director/writers have a very low opinion of the British military in general.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Y'know the more I think about it I think the movie's plot just isn't that good and the whole series is carried pretty much by the setting and atmosphere. I mean it was just England that was infected so how the frick wouldn't there have been a quicker intervention from the world?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It spreads quickly, but in any case it seems like plenty of Brits got out. The kids in 28 Weeks mention a big refugee camp in Spain, there must have been others. Just because a few nobodies insisted that the government collapsed didn't mean it did, they were wrong about the virus spreading globally after all.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            What I don't understand is how the infected managed to die from starvation but not Dehydration?
            They puke and vomit and constantly excel saliva within two days they would've died.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Can you imagine going 3 weeks without sex? Must be horrific!

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        They were always scum. They only survived the outbreak because they deserted and took over that manor house, definitely murdering whoever was there prior. Eccleston knew his control over them was tenuous at best and that letting them take the girls might keep them cohesive enough to stay together and not start killing eachother. His little speech to Jim is just to assuage his own guilt.

        Either that or the film's director/writers have a very low opinion of the British military in general.

        The movie explained it already.
        When the sergeant went against the team in telling them its wrong, he was under the correct assumption that the Island was quarantined, the remainder of the Soldiers believe the world collapse as the last messages were infection in Paris and New York.
        I do have to admit though 3 Weeks to get rapey is quite a jump but to them it can be considered the end times.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >I do have to admit though 3 Weeks to get rapey is quite a jump
          have you considered that they were bongers and that one of them was underage? bongers are always going on and on about how brown people are pedophiles and that they must be deported, it's because they hate the competition.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >>turn into raping murdering psychopaths
        They were in the military

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >turn into raping murdering psychopaths
        Anon I'm not sure why image you have of men in the military but it's clearly very romanticized and not at all based in reality.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I don't know why people think the military turning to rape after three weeks of no sex is realistic. I have met more late 20s khhvs in the military than anywhere else. The vast majority are just guys who didn't have the qualifications to do a job they wanted in a civilian capacity and got sweet talked by a recruiter. They're gullible and moronic usually, not violent or depraved. Half of them can't look at women and the other half have wives and kids.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >I don't know why people think the military turning to rape after three weeks of no sex is realistic
            It's not "3 weeks no sex" it's the complete breakdown in social order into might makes right. The soldiers, the ones with guns and training to kill, would easily dominate everyone else and simply take whatever they wanted. Source: literally all of human history

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              This, plus as that anon said himself, soldiers are moronic and gullible and will follow along with the group. They've done all sorts of evil shit because of peer pressure. Plus, in this scenario, they also thought that human civilization had completely collapsed.

              Though come to think of it, I wish the movie had explained why everyone seemed to think that (save for that one soldier). Jim saw a plane and there would have likely been others, plus who would assume the entire world would just collapse like that?

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Soldiers are trained for situations where might makes right anyway. They don't automatically resort to depraved actions in war, at least not in the west bar the odd exception. They tend to still just listen to whoever is in charge because it's easier even if shit hits the fan on a serious scale. Even if a group of soldiers thought the world had ended, it would still be a case of
              >Sergeant said we have to go and scavenge for some food at the supermarket
              >Are we allowed to bring back booze?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The first thing you need to protect a woman from is her own bad decisions, and then you really won't need to protect her from much else after you do so.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >kill hundreds of people
      ?

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Id live on top of a building so I could throw myself off at a moment's notice.

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'd probably be fricked
    Even if I hid at home with food and shit it would probably still turn into the weeks intro, they're too vigilant and good at breaking in and stuff

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Full TMNT sewer mode

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I don't live in Bongistan and I own guns. My nearest neighbor is over a mile(1.6km) away.

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    God can you imagine going 28 days without having sex with a woman? I'd go crazy too. Any man (or penised woman) that didn't die from the outbreak would certainly die from exploded, semen-overladen testicles.

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >surviving
    Forget that I'm joining the infected, look at how much fun you get to have.

  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Hole up and fortify my living space and hope for the best. I always have a pretty good amount of useful supplies stored up.

    That's if I were in the UK, but I'm not, in the US this would just turn into a giant shooting spree and be over with pretty quick. I'd use up all my ammo before touching my main supply cache.

  12. 4 weeks ago
    Craig T. Nelson

    >fast zombies

    Frick you.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      There not actually zombies they're infected.

  13. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    brendan gleeson's character had the right idea: big, strong dude in a modern suit of armor holding a choke while those behind him killed the infected. scavenge the apartment buildings for supplies, clearing room by room using the same tactic as described above. the problem is that gleeson's character would eventually get a stray drop of blood in an orifice which would ruin everything but you'd have a chance. there's no way that a single man with zero farming knowledge is going to be able to subsistence farm his way to the other side of a zombie apocalypse as they suggest with the ending.
    >but anon, he has the two women to help him
    as i said, a single man would not be able to do it.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I don't think they were implying that ending, just that Jim and the women were holding up on a farm and getting by until help arrived, which would not have taken that long because the infected were already starving.

      I agree that Gleeson's character had the best plan.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Getting by with what exactly is the question then, though. Even if that little cabin was miraculously stocked with enough food for three people to live on for any length of time, where the frick were the original owners? It's been a while since I saw the film, but when they do that little flyover shot is there actually any kind of farm or livestock?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          They leave the manor house in a car and it doesn't seem like access to food is an issue at all. There would have been stores to stop by, much in the same way they passed by stores on the way to Manchester. Also, random country cottages do exist, they're frequently summer homes and the like, the owners might not have even been around (as is heavily implied, I doubt Jim killed them). Again, the infected die relatively quickly so they might have only been at the cottage for what, maybe a couple of weeks at most?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah, I just rewatched the end scene now and they make it pretty clear that the house has a ton of tinned food and there's nearby bodies of water to fish in. It also shows some infected on their last legs, probably dying of starvation or the disease's damage to their body.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              What if the fish are infected?

  14. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >we have to go to the army base because we are running out of water
    >btw on our way to the army base lets stop off at this grocery store

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They went to the army base because the army claimed they had the answer to infection, it was a ruse on their part. It wasn't the water.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Protection would also be desirable. I personally wouldn't expect a company of British soldiers to go full rape mode after only 28 days.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          How the frick were the British supposed to protect everyone when they were still using the shitty L86?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            They had knife licenses.

  15. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Assuming you don't live in a big city and just get bum rushed on your way home from work. It'd be pretty easy to survive. Board of your house/apartment, fill up a ton of containers with water and ride it out.

  16. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'd just jerk off.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Oi you got a loiscense to wack off wanka? Guns are illegal in bongland.

  17. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The zombies in 28 days later make no sense so I have no idea how to properly defend against them.

  18. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    28 Days Later "infected" just aren't a viable threat to humanity if you spend a second to think about it. The only way 28 Years Later is going to work is if they tweak the transmission or survivability or something. There's no scenario where they couldn't be contained by first world militaries in less than 2 weeks.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The infection is much like a famine or war, the people won't be eradicated but it will take decades to reach the same standard as before without foreign help.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The entire problem with zombies being the result of some virus is that it tries to explain it a scientifically plausible manner and that just creates dozens of plot holes. But even if you set a lot of the issues of zombies moving and not being devoured by insects aside, there's the simple fact that if a mob of unarmed people charging mindlessly were a threat to a professional military the Roman Empire never would've conquered most of Europe 2000 years ago.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        A Roman zombie flick would be kino.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >The entire problem with zombies being the result of some virus is that it tries to explain it a scientifically plausible manner
        No they don't, all they really want to do is make the zombies a result of science fiction.
        >if a mob of unarmed people charging mindlessly were a threat to a professional military the Roman Empire never would've conquered most of Europe 2000 years ago.
        Well zombies aren't really comparable to Romans. Romans weren't capable of surviving fatal injuries unless you destroyed their brains, they weren't capable of killing people with just a scratch or a bite and they weren't capable turning everyone they killed into one of their own. This also isn't mentioning the idea of animals turning into zombies or becoming infected with virus like birds or insects. Point is that there are a lot of ideas you could play around with to make this scenario more believable.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >No they don't, all they really want to do is make the zombies a result of science fiction.
          Which is exactly what I said. There's no way to make zombies explainable via science without making them non-threatening.

          >Well zombies aren't really comparable to Romans.
          I wasn't comparing them to Romans, I was comparing them to the barbarians the Romans fought, who often lacked professional armies and simply mobbed the Romans they outnumbered with disorganized charges, which is more or less the way Zombies fight. In fact, the barbarians were actually more threatening than the zombies because they at least had weapons and armor and knew how to fight, zombies just mindlessly attack without any concern for their own safety and would by mowed down easily by any disciplined force.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >There's no way to make zombies explainable via science without making them non-threatening.
            I said science fiction not science.
            >they at least had weapons and armor and knew how to fight
            Zombies can sometimes do some of those things, I mean in night of the living dead they were using rocks and tools sometimes.
            >zombies just mindlessly attack without any concern for their own safety and would by mowed down easily by any disciplined force.
            Zombies can afford to fight like that because they're hard to kill it doesn't take a lot for them to infect you and when they do you're on their side.

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >I said science fiction not science.
              I think you need to look up what science fiction means.

              >Zombies can sometimes do some of those things
              Not sci-fi zombies, which are always delirious "infected".

              >I mean in night of the living dead
              Which isn't sci-fi, it's supernatural, which as I already stated is inherently superior to sci-fi zombies.

              >Zombies can afford to fight like that because they're hard to kill
              lol no, especially not sci-fi zombies

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >I think you need to look up what science fiction means.
                No I think you do.
                >Not sci-fi zombies, which are always delirious "infected".
                Except for land of the dead and return to the living dead.
                >Which isn't sci-fi, it's supernatural
                No it's sci-fi.
                >lol no, especially not sci-fi zombies
                Yes they can.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        as far as we know the 28 days later infected don't eat or drink water due to their delirium, so they should all basically dehydrate and die in 72 hours or so after infection. they also dont eat their victims like conventional zombies so they aren't getting sustenance that way either.
        not the biggest fan of the games or especially the show but for that reason in its own way the fungus-based zombies from the last of us is a bit better from a suspension of disbelief perspective. mostly because i dont know shit about mushrooms so then i dont have the frame of reference to know how these mushrooms things are supposed to eat lol

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It's not, though you could argue that 28 Days hinted at and 28 Weeks clearly depicted that some infected were smarter than others and that might be used as a plot point later. But ultimately, the infected aren't that dangerous in the long term, both movies had the cliche "humans are the real evil" shit going on.

      A Roman zombie flick would be kino.

      Agreed.

  19. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    find a big guy who can defend me and pay him by sucking

  20. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I live in a big city in Bongistan, probably kill the neighbours in my apartment and have the block of flats to myself. Fill as much things with water, live off my fat reserves and eat occasionally. Just be cozy and read books until im rescued, killed or starve.
    My favourite movie, it was the first horror I ever watched as a kid. I had to walk home from my friends house in the dark and was terrified 🙂

  21. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Neighbour has two little kids with some fresh meat.

  22. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    i'm a shut in who doesn't leave the house for a month at a time, they'd all be starving by the time i leave
    unless it happens while buying groceries then i'd almost certainly die

  23. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >get canned food I have stocked out of convenience
    >get out of big city
    >drive to the main cell tower with a maintenance room raised above ground
    >remove the retractable ladder
    >stay there until the infected die off
    the only problem would be knowing if they either starve or not, depending on it I would probably try and scav local stores, if I knew they would eventually die, I'd just stay huddle up.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >>get out of big city
      Everyone else has that same plan and it won't work for that reason.

      >No they don't, all they really want to do is make the zombies a result of science fiction.
      Which is exactly what I said. There's no way to make zombies explainable via science without making them non-threatening.

      >Well zombies aren't really comparable to Romans.
      I wasn't comparing them to Romans, I was comparing them to the barbarians the Romans fought, who often lacked professional armies and simply mobbed the Romans they outnumbered with disorganized charges, which is more or less the way Zombies fight. In fact, the barbarians were actually more threatening than the zombies because they at least had weapons and armor and knew how to fight, zombies just mindlessly attack without any concern for their own safety and would by mowed down easily by any disciplined force.

      The 28 Days Later infected are certainly threatening. And the other anon is right, that the infected and quickly and immediately infect and turn people into infected doesn't really make the situation comparable.

      i'd be dead quickly without much of a chance. i have no useful skills for an adult male. i always avoided my dad and brother when they were doing work around the house because something about it felt bad, but maybe i just didn't like them in particular. and it's always felt easy for me to get sick or infected.

      moreover i need glasses for my awful eyesight which i'm guessing would be in short supply.

      All you would need to do is have a bunch of supplies in a somewhat fortified situation. It doesn't have to be fancy, just safe enough. Then just wait for the whole thing to blow over.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >>get out of big city
        that's the hard part, yes, the cell tower though very few people here know about it, I used to camp near the base of it since is way high into a hill.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Top tip anon, get a little battery controlled radio or one with a handle to recharge and make a list of a couple different common military frequencies. That way you don't need to even bother with the scav shit if you've got enough resources. Just tune in every once in a while and listen because even if the military fell apart, people would try to communicate and most military vehicles have some kind of radio. They're also quite high power and wouldn't be encrypted because it's not like you need secure comms with zombies.

  24. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    should i watch 28 days later?

    i completely avoid zombie/survival/horror stuff but i thought the opening of the last of us was pretty awesome so it's got me interested.

    the moment when something is "off" and you see both a character and the wider world catching onto that fact. you see some fighter jets. you see more people on the street than usual. a loved one isn't returning calls. then things spiral out of control and people scramble for their lives and try to escape the suburbs/cities. eventually lockdowns and military law is imposed.

    oh also that literal survivalist homosexual stuff was cool.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >the moment when something is "off" and you see both a character and the wider world catching onto that fact
      28 Days Later has basically none of that. It starts with a dude waking up from a coma after all that stuff is over. The apocalypse is still very fresh and not everything is totally destroyed yet, but the "fall" is done and people have already shifted into survival mode.

  25. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    i'd be dead quickly without much of a chance. i have no useful skills for an adult male. i always avoided my dad and brother when they were doing work around the house because something about it felt bad, but maybe i just didn't like them in particular. and it's always felt easy for me to get sick or infected.

    moreover i need glasses for my awful eyesight which i'm guessing would be in short supply.

  26. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Abandon my useless wife.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *