I am Diabetes! That's like me in the movie. I like the movie
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
I am Diabetes! That's like me in the movie. I like the movie
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
>we have to represent every type of person on screen or they will feel excluded
>frick you racist white boy why do you need to see other white people in movies are you really that fragile?
i hate you mayocucks so much it is unreal. you have this weird superiority complex yet cry like little fricking b***hes. frick you.
It isn’t a complex we just are.
frick off diabetoids
>mayocuck
What? Why isn't there a containment board for Americans so we don't have to listen to you?
American website
N
My self insert character is colonizing yours.
>i hate you mayocucks so much it is unreal.
Nah, you do.
>you reply
>you cry
Yeah I know you call logic white supremacy, but come on.
Sorry gay. If your movie includes anyone in the cast that isnt a white man, your movie is shit
What happens if I capital the letter between B and M?
Friendly reminder that has been seething about the "fook yu" gag in Goldmember for the past 20 years.
>No, you see, we're casting Black folk who can't act and hispanics who can't speak English because they're better than whitey, not because we love slurping corporate wiener and have a mandatory 80% Black folk and hispanics policy
nice (you)sT
all the replies just proving your point
I have t1d, I feel like this representation is unnecessary, the disease does not define who I am, and I don’t feel underrepresented or the need for representation.
I watched a movie the other day that didn't have a 6'2 white guy with a 7 inch penis (when erect) and I felt really depressed an uninterested by the end of it. I imagine that's how people with type I diabetes feel watching any movie that isn't Turning Red so I'm starting to understand this whole "representation matters" thing pretty well.
We don't have a superiority complex, you have an inferiority complex. We are objectively just all around better with few weak points.
>waah waah stop crying I'm not crying you are
I'm not crying, no one is crying, waah shitskins frick off
>mayocucks say they dont care
>proceed to prove your point by seething in the replies
We do care about how superior we are though.
Is it really that weird to have a superiority complex? I mean look around
>all those replies
lmao white ppl really do get triggered when you call them out on their mayo obsession.
This is even funnier than when you post a cover of “white fragility” with zero context and you get 6 gorillion seething replies about how white fragility doesn’t exist lmao
The post the broke Cinemaphile
Cumskins seething
>All these replies
Goddamn you proved your point I guess. I never realised when this site got filled with so many pussy homosexuals.
Two girls in the OP pic are white
where are the white males? yeah right
>where are the white males?
They're on Cinemaphile, acting like homosexuals.
Well, they claim to be white.
They are curled up in their mother's arms sucking breasts
Did you scream about the lack of white women in Pochahontas or Mulan?
Dude pretty much every movie has a white dude, even the "woke" ones still have white men as the main character
>even the "woke" ones still have white men as the main character
thats... not even remotely true in 2022.
funny
mexican novelas are 95% mexican
chinese movies are 95% chinese actors
indian movies 95% indian actors
weird how woke people dont complain
You are right anon, none of this makes any sense. It's doublethink, it's two contradictory ideals held at once, and it's designed to break you down mentally until you just stop questioning and stop resisting.
>where is the down syndrome kid?
>where is the cerebral palsy kid?
>where is the wheelchair kid?
>where is the leukemia kid?
>where is the blind kid?
>where is the deaf kid?
>where is the autistic kid?
>where is the very autistic kid?
>where is the Tourette's kid?
>where is the prosthetic arms kid?
>where is the kid with two moms who MUST walk into the classroom every morning to let everyone know that this kid in this class has TWO MOMS?
>where is the kid who is abused by his parent?
>where is the kid who is abused by her parent?
>where is the kid who is abused by their parent?
>where is the kid who is abused by xe parent?
>where is the kid who is abused by xis parent?
>where is the kid who is abused by its parent?
>where is the kid who is abused by the kid whose gender doesn't use pronouns parent?
Yeah I'm thinking this movie is problematic.
How many diabetic children are there in the world? I could see putting in one as an easter egg, but two?
Women writers doing mesearch.
They focus on dumb details like this instead of just presenting a compelling story.
this is how women think. you know it to be true in your heart. they spent an hour talking about these moronic patches
Women crave seeing themselves on screen in one form or another. This is why twilight was so wildly successful. The main character is the most generic, plain american schoolgirl conceivable and females all watch that movie and say "shes literally me".
Shouldn't the gay audience be asking themselves why children have diabetes?
>why children have diabetes?
It's assumed to be type-1 diabetes, not type-2 beetus.
>There is a prevalence rate of 0.3% of type 1 among children and adolescents ages 0-19
The odds of two kids in the same class having type 1 diabetes is at almost impossible levels
I taught at a high school of 120 students and there were three girls with type-1 diabetes. Type-1 tends to run in families, so it will cluster when you have siblings and cousins in the same school. Two kids in the same class would be extremely rare if that class was a perfectly distributed sample of the US population, but it never is.
120 kids is more than three times the standard of 30 student class size and the two girls in the picture are not shown to be related
I only ever encountered one person with type 1 diabetes throughout my entire school years
>Your experience doesn't count because 120 is a lot of kids, not like 30
>I can tell those kids in the movie aren't related
>I only met one type-1 diabetic person in school, so I'm right
>The odds of two kids in the same class having type 1 diabetes is at almost impossible levels
i had this in my class
>movie has a giant red panda
>totally plausible
>movie has two kids in the same class with type 1 diabetes
>totally implausible, literally white genocide in the making
>needing ridiculous strawmen to justify that you're angry about a diabetic character in a children's movie
Do you not read what you post?
>The odds of two kids in the same class having type 1 diabetes is at almost impossible levels
Uh oh. Somebody doesn't know about the birthday problem.
a global statistical average doesn't mean it's impossible for smaller arbitrary samples to have deviance
>being so moronic you don't know about type 1 diabeetus
oh yeah, sure every kid had that.
And you have the gall to label others like that, yikes.
>"I-I bet you're an SJW! Y-You're a hypocrite!"
I never said I cared about people calling others moronic either. Quit having such a polarized worldview.
Kek. This board never ceases to amaze me with how many moronic zoomers there are here. How the frick does one not know the difference between type 1 and type 2 diabetes?
Take your insulin shot you fat frick with fat frick parents
>get btfo
>"U-Ur fat lol"
You need to be 18 to post here, kid
Why do you get angry about a character in a children's movie having type 1 diabetes? Also this thread belongs on Wrong board
Why do you get angry about a film thread on the film board?
>NO U!
There's practically zero discussion about the film in the entire thread. Its just people talking about diabeetus and a handful of posts pretending to care about how the representation is just for social media points.
> Also this thread belongs on Wrong board
i only knew one kid ever with diabetes they need a kid with auts that every one bullies and a mexican kid that pierces their eyebrow in class with a safety pin and cusses out the teacher and some other things idk
It must suck to have a needle stuck in you 24/7
What are the chances?
This film was also directed by Scott Malkinson
South park really was doing the whole inclusion thing way before it was cool
how many people had diabetes in the 90s, wtf canada? I thought us burgers were the fat ones.
I didn't know of any kid growing up that had that shit.
I thought it was abortion pill patches that keep them from getting pregnant from their Groomer trannies rancid semen when he/she plays hide the diversity with them after class.
We didn't have that in the 90s, we were just normal
Maybe if filmmakers focused more on making quality content as opposed to checking off boxes in the endless list of asses their movie needs to kiss,
the people they're pandering to would actually go and see their movie instead of rewatching old stuff that was actually good because it cared about the shit that actually matters.
Why don't they just get it over with and make a movie exclusively filled with black and disabled people? Once it flops they'll see how little their inclusivity matters.
i will diabeat these bucks so hard that they will chuck and frick
>men make a masterpiece like wall-e about a robot and the planet dying from pollution
>women just make self insert fan fiction based on themselves and how tough their life was in upper class suburban canada
Amazing.
>Oh no, they put a thing that exists in a movie, this makes me upset for some reason
Cry more.
Didn't exist in 2001, especially on two kids who are not even fat.
OP's screencap explicitly states "Type-1 diabetes"
you're picking a weird hill to die on.
type-1 or type-2, it's not common enough to make a big deal about, like in the OP tweet. The entire thread consists of people railing on this kind of hollow representation, yet autistic you only can correct the people (who probably don't give a single frick) about what type of diabetes was referred to.
>you're picking a weird hill to die on
You're the one literally getting mad about some background character in a cartoon for children having diabeetus. I would suggest re-evaluating your life and getting other hobbies than "muh culture war" if miniscule things like this upset you.
>you only can correct the people (who probably don't give a single frick) about what type of diabetes was referred to
If you claim diabetes didn't exist in the 90's because childhood obesity wasn't as prevalent back then and then someone says "learn to read, it specifically states the characters had it from birth" its not autism its just pointing out your illiteracy. Thats just moving goalposts because you can't admit you're wrong and that you're getting angry about tiny details in children's cartoons as a grown man.
Not him but but the difference between type 1 and 2 are so big that it makes you look like a moron saying stuff like that
>you're picking a weird hill to die on.
>Reeeee that background character in a CGI kid flick about a girl turning into a Panda is totally unrealistic reeeeeee
>doesn't know about type 1 diabetes
moron alert
movie needed more 9/11
both my parents are diabetics but I haven't been diagnosed yet
Genetically defective people shouldn't have kids.
They already had Scott Malkinson though.
>OMG! My diabetes has now been made a product of! YAY!
Taste your pee. If it’s sweet, you have diabetes.
While you're at it, you should also taste my pee. You know... to check for diabetes, haha.
I have hemorrhoids. Where’s my representation in Pixar movies?
All of those fat fricks in Wall-E probably had hemorrhoids.
How is the audience supposed to know without a scene of them applying hemorrhoid cream or shitting in agony?
What? An animated child has diabetes? This is literally white genocide.
What? An animated child has diabetes? This is literally stunning and brave and will own the chuds!
Where those even widely available at the time? I used to babysit a kid with an insulin pump ten years ago and his was at least twice that size.
does your tingles on your feet and/or are a bit swolen? if the answer is yes you have diabetes and you'll probably lose your right foot
Wow! I love how inclusive these fictional cartoons are getting. They're traumatizing. When are we going to see kids with AIDS or morons with downs syndrome?
Those sensors are a pretty recent invention , isnt this movie set in the 90's? My little brother is type 1 and he just got one
This movie in no way represents the actual 90s, its kind of a weird hybrid with present times.
honestly a bit grubhubesque.
I mean at the end of the day its just some dumb thing some writer put in so she can feel represented. Pretty fricking stupid. My brother doesnt need people with sensors on TV to know other people like him exist , but hes not a fricking dumbass
It's the early oughts.
ahh , still I dont think they were invented till 2010's
I'm glad their around regardless, they seem like a blessing to people w/ diabetes.
But this movie didn't give a shit, they just wanted their positives tweets! At least show a kid having to prick their figure which sucks and how kids did it when I school, graduated in '11.
Yeah , My brother used to be all over the place now his A1C ( 3 month average ) is 6.5 which is excellent
when i saw the diabetes patch I CLAPPED and IT WAS EVERYTHING
When I saw it, I came to Cinemaphile to complain about being oppressed.
*puts a jolly rancher in your mouth*
heh what now b***h
they should have showed the kids' degenerating retinae instead
Heres a clever little detail people may have missed. In season 11 of the simpsons in the tomacco episode, Homer comes across a farm with a strange name 'Sneeds seed and feed, formerly chucks'. When he walks past both farmer 1 and farmer 2 on the porch they both have blue patches on their arms. They are actually Insulin infusion sets for type-1 diabetes. Chuck, the former owner of the establishment was diagnosed with type-1 diabetes as a child.
>N-No dude! I-I totally care about children with diabetes and how the representation is shallow! I'm totally just not getting angry because /tvpol/ told me to!
The antiwork moderator looked healthy before the transition. Many such cases. Sad!
Why do you want children's cartoons to be propaganda? Where did you get this idea from? Because to anyone who hasn't been mentally destroyed it's distasteful.
How is showing insulin patches propaganda?
>showing children with diabetes existing is propaganda
Now I wan't diabetes too!
they/them transitioned, they go by Doreen now you fricking bigot
I have type 1 diabetes. Got diagnosed as a teenager but some people get diagnosed as kids. It's so rare that kids seeing other kids who have the same condition they do is very comforting, even if it's just in a movie. I take it this is more incel b***hing about non-issues.
>I’m Scott Malkinson and I have diabetes : southpark
I hate that character , but to be fair I think Matt and Trey hate that character as well
ITT chuds being genocided by little girls with diabetes
why is Cinemaphile talking about a children's cartoon? what is going on here?
K
How the frick do you get diabeetus as a child?
Because type 1 is through genetics and is commonly diagnosed at a young age
Type one is not genetic , its cause some illness attacks your pancreas and fricks up your ability to produce insulin. Type 2 on the other hand is a mixture of genetics and being generally unhealthy
No type 1 is genetics and only rarely are there cases where the person gets it without a parent also having it. The cause is still currently unknown what causes type 1 but the white blood cells gets into the pancreas and start destroying the cells inside which creates insulin. Type 2 is passed through genetically but can also be caused due to having a high body mass which is why type 2 is a lot more common than type 1
Alright thanks for clarifying.
I've never known anyone who has had diabetes from young age.
>How the frick do you get diabeetus as a child?
Be American.
I wonder why they never say, just hide behind homies instead.
>chink
>fat
>panda
is every child in canada disabled somehow?
we're down to like two now
Not even close to the truth. Touch the grass, have the sex, take the meds.
Tom cruise and who else?
Not him but we also had Chris Pratt AKA Jurassic Park Starlord guy.
Why would a diabetic person want to watch references to their weakening condition on the media?
Its ironic cause you probably have 20+ chronic ailments including critical thinking
Its a children's movie, children with diabetes will probably like to see a character thats like them on the screen.
Only women care about this, which is why they have to self-insert into everything they make. I didn't get get butthurt as a kid because nobody in Star Wars worse glasses like I did.
Of course you didn’t. Just like how the kids with diabetes patches don’t get upset because a movie doesn’t have a character with a patch. However, you probably would have noticed if a character in Star Wars DID have glasses. Maybe you wouldn’t have cared, but there are kids out there that would have noticed and thought it was cool. It’s not hard to understand.
>Maybe you wouldn’t have cared, but there are kids out there that would have noticed and thought it was cool. It’s not hard to understand.
Yes and those kids are girls, who were the target audience for Turning Red. Like I said, it's something only women care about for the most part. Boys want movie characters to be cool so they can imagine they'll grow up to be like those characters someday. Girls want the movie characters to look and act exactly like they do, because females all think they're the center of the universe.
>yay I can celebrate my fat moronic mommy and daddy passing on their illnesses to be thx to their shit lifestyle yay xoxoxox
>coming up with blatant strawmen to defend the fact that you are a grown man who gets angry when a children's movie shows a character having diabetes
Nobody said anything about celebrating it. Children with illnesses/disabilities often feel comforted by the fact that a fictional character has it too. You might also want to look up how type 1 diabetes works. Its not like aids where you get it and then its passed onto your children.
you'd probably be dead if you had type 1 diabetes and didn't know it past age 20
I've had type 1 diabeetus for 30 years.
I only ever met one other kid with it growing up. I also never tell anyone I have it.
Do you not wear libras or insulin pumps then? I used to not tell anyone about it, not that Imm embarrassed but because I didnt think it was relevant
I don't need your fancy technology, I just use insulin pens + finger pokes.
I used to think that too, I still use the pen but after using the libra I found it better than the finger pricker in every way. I only used it for a test trial but it’s just a lot more convenient and faster to check and I’ve not had a problem with them yet
I have a pump with a sensor , its done wonders for my A1C , I still finger check 3 times a day , but the sensor gives me a 24 picture of my levels
Blonde girl is the cutest character in the movie
Don't tell me, they're lusting over a mulatto boy band member.
No that's the scene where they see how cute Mei's panda form is
I also get excited when I see a white man on the big screen. Representation is very important:
imagine being afraid of sugar
Self inserts have ruined everything
Didn't these patches not exist at the time the movie is set? Also, nobody would've noticed if it wasn't for the tech supervisor pointing it out
Of course people would have noticed it. Specifically the people who have diabetes.
The general public wouldn't have noticed though.
Those characters are seen for like 3 seconds. And I doubt kids with diabeetus actively look for characters with beetus patches.
>movie takes place in late 90s/early 2000s
>Insulin Infusion Patches didn't exist until 2011
If israelitemerica and israel disappeared there would be complete world peace in a few months.
Because China would have conquered all of it and outfited every person on the planet with slave collars that kill them if they disobey the government?
without America, the middle east would develop a massive amount of nuclear arms within 3 years, a terrorist cell would take over a major facility, and they would detonate the entire non-islamic world. you're a complete fricking moron if you think this wouldnt happen
>detonate the entire non-islamic world.
So Europe has nothing to worry about?
so nuke those as well
nuke every country that isnt european(excluding sweden) and japan
new masterrace
Where are all the Incel lonely dudes back in the class making plans to shoot up the school? Where is my representation?
can we talk about the opposite? was south park constantly making a joke out of a diabetic kid actually funny?
yes
wasnt this filmed in 2001 those patches are a more recent invention
representation MATTERS
uh oh stinky
> "We put blue patches on two of the girls in reference to someone on our staff who has diabetes."
WOW, WHAT AN EXCITING EASTER EGG HOLY SHIT. THIS IMPROVES THE MOVIE TIMES A BILLION I'M GONNA SEE THIS MOVIE NOW WHOOOOA NELLY
seriously though who the frick cares? i was too busy jerking off to the mom and her kid in panda form to care about some diabetes refererence nobody noticed
I wish the most brutal and merciless death upon that diabetes ridden slag
Diabetes is such an awful, horrible fricking disease, that I can’t even get mad or upset, I just feel bad. And don’t you get it as a kid by inheriting it?
lmao when will they include for no reason downies and kids with fricked up limbs?
>no pilonidal cyst representation
When will it be our turn, lads?
>that one kid who faked having diabetes so he could eat in class
Imagine being so fricking boring your only noteworthy attribute is a disease you happen to have.
>182 posts for this
You're all a bunch of fricking losers
Why does the b***h on the right look like she has downs?
How come morons aren't celebrating they're being represented?
All women are prostitutes
Please disney, make my dream come true! Im an nerdy guy who became awkward and stayed awkward and got laid at 25y first time and got alcohol problem. I dont know how to have sex and it was awkward. Im afraid of things.
diabetes rules
>look! everyone is diseased and sexually deviant!
Genuinely distributing.
Wouldn't better representation be one of these diabetic kids having a seizure because of their levels? Like who is watching this seeing a half a second shot of a patch and then going WOW REP.
>acting like homosexuals on here don't see themselves as ryan gosling in drive and br2049 cuz he plays an autist and a robot
>Hey you, stupid kid with the wheelchair.
>I know you want a breid escape from the harsh reality of your legs not working, but we want to keep reminding you of how miserable we want you to be.
Oh so that's why whites want over representation in movies. It all makes sense now
Tumblr ruined a generation of women
Tumblr used to be pretty good for porn.
ITT
>movies shows someone with a disease
>WTF. WHITE GENOCIDE. WHITE GENOCIDE. AAAAAAAAAAA
There's legit no issue here. Get fricked. No one is saying everything needs representation in every movie.
You already made this post. I fart in your face and you swallow it lmao
First post in this thread. If others posted it, it means its probably correct. And since it's the most logical argument, it's even FURTHER guaranteed to be such.
when you have that thousand yard type-1 diabetes stare