I am still mad about Jurassic park 3. We are supposed to believe a Spinosaurus could survive a T rex bite . 57,000 newtons of bite force would crush a spino.
Frick you Kathleen Kennedy, you have ruined all the autism media
 |
 UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
|
it was jack horner's idea to have spinosaurus in the film
blame universal studios and whoever wrote jp3 for making the film a giant pos
I blame Horner for everything bad that's happened in paleontology for the last 25 years.
Hey, moron, they weren't real dinosaurs.
They're giant frog monsters made to look like dinosaurs.
Hope this helps.
You've had 2 whole movies that starred that overrated fatass dino. Let others shine for once.
The T rex is an amazing animal that dominated north america's biosphere for millions of years. None of the other therapods compare to it.
I guess allosaurus much longer lifespan is cool, most of the mature t-rex we find are in their mid twenties.
Kennedy was in control of the movie
>Kennedy was in control of the movie
producer's role isn't creative, I doubt that
>None of the other therapods compare to it.
A bunch do, T-rex is one of the most boring and oversaturated dinosaur in existence.
t-rex lived fast and died young, violently
if you wanna get autistic about it, allosaurs were built for blitzing sauropods and biting a chunk out of them and rinse repeating til it bled out whereas t-rex was built for 1v1ing other giant dinosaurs, the mortality rate for a t-rex fighting a triceratops is definitely much higher than an allosaur dogging a bronto til it dies.
elder rex' were giga homies
fat fricks couldn't even run anymore and had to ambush prey before they could escape
there are some theories of t-rex having small packs composed of parents and children, but i'm not sure how true that is
>most of the mature t-rex we find are in their mid twenties.
Probably outdated by now but I remember my old DK T Rex book claiming that T Rex could live to over 100.
Dinosaurs are as fake and gay as outer space.
The T-Rex getting killed by the spino is the least of JP3's problems
Unironically.
OH NO NO NO SPINOSISTERS...We got too wienery!
I believe dinosaurs existed but the spinosaurus is a hard sell for me
How do you feel about Dimetrodon?
Why is it smiling at me?
He's a bit of a smilodon
My ancestor
Ive always wondered how well they and other synapids could move and how they would compare to similarly sized animals today
Man, I really want a Natalis or a Teutonis as a pet; Dimetrodons and Spinos are just the cutest.
He cute
Why would it go into the sea? Spinosaurus was fresh water adapted.
It's just a giant alligator, Anon.
Why did it need the massive fin then? It's not like they were using them to catch wind like the sails of a boat
Dinosaurs have spikes and horns and talons and growths and bumps and scutes and bullshit all over them but we’re drawing a line at spino having raised vertebrae?
Only male peawieners have those feathers and it's so the skinny no feather b***hes accept their cum. That's their main function
Maybe it helped them to float.
Or to dissipate heat when it wasn't swimming/wading
>Why did it need the massive fin then?
They're not a 100% sure since there's limited surviving examples and how much you can tell from fossilized remains, but it's a well-established part of biology, even within dinosaurs in the same region prior to the Spinosaurus (see pic, same region but earlier). Either threat display, mating attraction, or thermo-regulation (or all three) are the most common candidates. It was not likely an evolution specifically for water-use.
Don't forget Rebachisaurus who also had a sail/fin/hump
I believe OPs mom was around them and had something to do with a massive hump. According to fossilized bathroom graffiti
I really just do not buy the massive fins. The "maybe they were used for some menial task" just doesn't do it for me. Like what lizard has fins twice the size of their body even on a 6 inch long lizard now?
You actually raise a good point. Nature doesn't allow it. Science has lied yet again.
>Why would it go into the sea? Spinosaurus was fresh water adapted.
Because JP3 broke autistic manbabies minds to the point some of them grew up to be fraud paleontologists and glue three different animals together to make the Spinosaurus look moronic and incapable. Manbabies like
What the frick are you talking about? Most Allosaurs lived fast and died young, we don't even have any definitive adults. The Rex lived way longer
>None of the other Therapods
Spinosaurus was most likely larger, heavier and stronger
Carcharodontosaurus and Giganotosaurus spent their days hunting 100 ton sauropods, the T-Rex isn't invincible.
literal knuckle dragger
scrolling by, I initially thought these were chastity cages. my brain might be too far gone bros.
Hike the appalachian trail or something
been watching a lot of palaeontology vids lately like from that ben g thomas fella on youtube. mainly the sea dinos
>I am still mad about Jurassic park 3. We are supposed to believe a Spinosaurus could survive a T rex bite . 57,000 newtons of bite force would crush a spino.
Boy, I really hope somebody got fired for that blunder.
>this made rextards seethe for over TWO (2) decades
only reason it makes me seethe is the blatant abuse of CGI
that's the real reason no one likes the sequels, they went away from prosthetics and effort to lazy, outsourced CGI.
It looked like shit then and looks even worse now.
Fun fact, there were parts of the fight that were filmed with the animatronics fighting each other.
The only reason it's not in the movie is because the Spinosaurus animatronic knocked the head off the T. rex animatronic.
Front view is exploitable
>We are supposed to believe a Spinosaurus could survive a T rex bite
yes its a movie for kids
>for kids
If anything that means it should be less moronic. Have you ever seen boomer kids' movies and TV from the fifties and sixties? It's sometimes genuinely intelligent. Our generation had Spongebob, and now everyone talks and acts like morons.
>purposefully shows jaw not open
Did they just make up an entire dinosaur based on a few bones? Just look at the ribs the spino compared to the rex, they're a fricking puny.
They do that often. A lot of palentology is speculative pseudoscience at best with the little evidence they recover and most "facts" are wild extrapolation.
It's largely based on it's far more complete relatives, Suchomimus and Baryonyx
Allosaurus, of course.
They reconstructed Denisovians from a part of a jaw, a tooth, and a pinky bone.
And wait until you see how paleoartists handle living species with the same speculation they use on dinosaurs on regular animals. This is their attempt at a frickin baboon.
that wasn't made be a paleoartist
that was made by a regular artist, a bad one, trying to make a "point" about how paleontology was bad without having even the slightest bit of understanding about the field
nah i'm right.
They can guess what the bodyplan looked like by looking at related species and doing a comparison.
For example if you found the jawbone and half the paw of a mastiff it would be hard to reconstruct the body, but if you realized it was a canid and had the complete skeletons of a chihuahua and a coyote you could compare bone length ratios and end up with a decent guess of what the animal might have looked like.
The reason the sail is impossible to figure out is that it's incredibly hard to determine what the skin/fat/feather/hair etc on the outside looked like just by examining skeletal remains. They don't know if it was a big hump covered in fat or a thin sail like in the JP movie.
I don't care what anyone says. I loved it. Sure I was 13 or something but the Pteranodon walking out of the fog made me shit more bricks than pretty much any other movie.
Do we have a single dinosaur BONE or are they all rocks?
Frick it, Cinemaphile what's your favourite dinosaurs?
Mine is Suchomimus. It looks like a crocodile-raptor, and I think that's cool.
Ankylosaurus fricking rules, dude.