He was actually one of the more entertaining parts of the movie, to be honest. I like how his random comment about working on a show with the FBI turned out to be crucial to the ending.
>so why can't another movie make fun of it?
Because it's fricking Disney taking the potshots, and they have no room to throw stones after their godawful LA movies, yet this movie does nothing BUT throw stones.
It's not about punching up/down, but the hypocrisy of a Disney product making fun of shit they do as well. Maybe you can say it's self-effacing, but it comes across more like a large corporation tryimg to show it's "hip with the kids".
It's not about punching up/down, but the hypocrisy of a Disney product making fun of shit they do as well. Maybe you can say it's self-effacing, but it comes across more like a large corporation tryimg to show it's "hip with the kids".
It barely makes fun of anything. The only way they were able to get the cameos in the movie was that the lawyers for every company that owns the rights to the characters had to sign off on them first. So they weren't allowed to poke fun at them out of fear of offending the corporate lawyers. It's all fake parodies of movies that don't exist.
And Disney never truly makes fun of itself because Disney as a company has no self awareness.
Jealous of the superior children's film. Sonic 2 has shown a new level of children's storytelling innovation so it can be learned from clearly by children and adults.
If people can learn from this film to make even better children's movies, work like the Rescue Rangers movie will be left in the past to collect as garbage for when God exposes the works of sinners
You sound like you worked on the movie if you think that's clever.
I still can't believe multiple people were involved in designing that character and no one had the balls to say "Holy crap this is an a abomination, guys how did we go from the classic style to THIS?"
America, as opposed to who, frickhead? The ugly ass Christopher Robin movie directed by swiss-german, or the numerous indie 3d european movies that are so hard on the eyes?
>X movie >Not a continuation of the X show or an adaptiaon of the X source material >But X in "the real world" >See Also: The Smurfs
Why? Like literally why? Did this idea work exactly once and they're trying to copy it? How did this even came to be?
Because model makers, animatronics builders, and 90s-Disney tier hand drawn animators are highly skilled craftspeople that have a union to demand good wages for their services that the overseas render jockeys lack.
Why does modernity hate models?
The viewing public has more money to spend and the techniques to create them have only gotten cheaper.
The Viewing public doesn't care about models enough to invest when CGI will yield better results and is more versatile..
And the prequels had more models AND more actual sets than the original trilogy.
The prequels had more models in them than the original trilogy did and every single star wars film has a shit ton of practical effects. You have no idea what you're talking about.
The past 10 years of Internet media consumption has been nothing but lard-laden circlejerking. Star Wars 7 was its peak, now we're on the downhill path that leads to civil unrest and war with Israel.
Kinda wish pluto was the villain instead, Peter Pan's whole is way to similiar to what happened to his VA, which is worse
Oh wait this is modern disney, the people who filmed live action Mulan near a concentration camp and thanked them in the credits. Might as well be shouting kill all uighurs at the top of their lungs while being fricked by the chinese leaders
>A movie that's entire premise, script and visuals consist of "Remember <old thing>?" while doing nothing clever or interesting with it's celebrity voiced characters has a 7/10 on IMDB and 81% audience score on rotten tomatoes.
I CLAPPED WHEN I SAW THE THING FROM MY CHILDHOOD
IT BROKE NEW GROUND
(Rich Evans laugh)
Rich: "Now, see, this is a woman I'd actually frick."
Jesse: "RICH!"
Uh, meow?
I hate looking at this character because I can tell exactly what he smells like
like what?
He was actually one of the more entertaining parts of the movie, to be honest. I like how his random comment about working on a show with the FBI turned out to be crucial to the ending.
you need to be shot
What? I found it funny. Everyone finds Ugly Sonic to be a hilarious frickup for Sega and Paramount, so why can't another movie make fun of it?
no you are alone
>so why can't another movie make fun of it?
Because it's fricking Disney taking the potshots, and they have no room to throw stones after their godawful LA movies, yet this movie does nothing BUT throw stones.
It's funny, we had people complaining about punching up but when the top dogs do it suddenly it's a problem
*punching down
It's not about punching up/down, but the hypocrisy of a Disney product making fun of shit they do as well. Maybe you can say it's self-effacing, but it comes across more like a large corporation tryimg to show it's "hip with the kids".
It barely makes fun of anything. The only way they were able to get the cameos in the movie was that the lawyers for every company that owns the rights to the characters had to sign off on them first. So they weren't allowed to poke fun at them out of fear of offending the corporate lawyers. It's all fake parodies of movies that don't exist.
And Disney never truly makes fun of itself because Disney as a company has no self awareness.
Jealous of the superior children's film. Sonic 2 has shown a new level of children's storytelling innovation so it can be learned from clearly by children and adults.
If people can learn from this film to make even better children's movies, work like the Rescue Rangers movie will be left in the past to collect as garbage for when God exposes the works of sinners
You sound like you worked on the movie if you think that's clever.
But I didn't. I just think it's funny he was even in it.
I'm alone in thinking Ugly Sonic is ugly?
you should have a nice day
No, you should have a nice day.
Youre right, ignore the other hamfingers who cant have fun.
I still can't believe multiple people were involved in designing that character and no one had the balls to say "Holy crap this is an a abomination, guys how did we go from the classic style to THIS?"
This guy is a horror show just to look at.
Remember the Smurf movies?
America is really fricking weird about adding unnecessary realistic details.
tbh no, I only saw one of them and then repressed the memories.
But beyond that... you have a point.
Damn, since when does T B H (to be honest) gets filtered to tbh?
hello newfren
enjoy your stay
you're here forever
America, as opposed to who, frickhead? The ugly ass Christopher Robin movie directed by swiss-german, or the numerous indie 3d european movies that are so hard on the eyes?
Arcane and the Lupin movie looked pretty good
Funny enough, CG Dale looks like he came from the late 2000’s - early 2010’s era of live action/animated films
>X movie
>Not a continuation of the X show or an adaptiaon of the X source material
>But X in "the real world"
>See Also: The Smurfs
Why? Like literally why? Did this idea work exactly once and they're trying to copy it? How did this even came to be?
Why does modernity hate models?
The viewing public has more money to spend and the techniques to create them have only gotten cheaper.
The Viewing public doesn't care about models enough to invest when CGI will yield better results and is more versatile..
And the prequels had more models AND more actual sets than the original trilogy.
Because model makers, animatronics builders, and 90s-Disney tier hand drawn animators are highly skilled craftspeople that have a union to demand good wages for their services that the overseas render jockeys lack.
The prequels had more models in them than the original trilogy did and every single star wars film has a shit ton of practical effects. You have no idea what you're talking about.
I clapped at the Slither reference.
so does this universe just have 2 sonics running around for some reason
Why did they replace Jar Jar with Ugly Sonic?
It’s funny how this Sonic is supposed to be a mockery of the original ugly design but it’s actually superior because it was made with intention.
that homie looks like something Penders would draw
The past 10 years of Internet media consumption has been nothing but lard-laden circlejerking. Star Wars 7 was its peak, now we're on the downhill path that leads to civil unrest and war with Israel.
Why try to make a good movie when you can shove in a bunch of shit that'll make people clap at the reference instead?
Like, I get the joke but I wasn't laughing.
Kinda wish pluto was the villain instead, Peter Pan's whole is way to similiar to what happened to his VA, which is worse
Oh wait this is modern disney, the people who filmed live action Mulan near a concentration camp and thanked them in the credits. Might as well be shouting kill all uighurs at the top of their lungs while being fricked by the chinese leaders
>A movie that's entire premise, script and visuals consist of "Remember <old thing>?" while doing nothing clever or interesting with it's celebrity voiced characters has a 7/10 on IMDB and 81% audience score on rotten tomatoes.
How much did they pay sega for this?