I don't mind spider-verse visual style in spider-verse, but i hate to see it in non-spider-verse.

I don't mind spider-verse visual style in spider-verse, but i hate to see it in non-spider-verse. Does that make sense?

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    yeah i get it. If every animated film now wants to be spider-verse inspired it will ironically make them all the same.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Beauty and the Beast is a hit
      >almost every animated film going forward is a kids' musical
      >Toy Story is a hit
      >CG animation becomes the new norm
      >Shrek is a hit
      >more animated features become star-powered and pop culture referential
      Is anyone really shocked?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Spider-Verse wasn't a hit though and every movie that copied its gimmick flopped

        Big Hero 6 made more money than ATSV adjusted for inflation and you don't see anyone copying that

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Spider-Verse wasn't a hit
          The Academy begs to differ.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            So beauty and the beast, toy story and shrek were hits because of the academy?

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Literally yes (of course among other things).

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >So beauty and the beast, toy story and shrek were hits because of the academy?

              All of those have much better reviews

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >animation oscar
            >post 2016 especially
            Who gives a shit really, Happy Feet, Brave, Big Hero 6, Soul etc all have one and aren't considered hits by anyone

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Spider-Verse wasn't a hit though and every movie that copied its gimmick flopped

          It's sequel made more than double the amount the first one did and the first one made a decent (but not spectacular) haul at the box office with a insane surge of popularity once it hit streaming on Netflix. Puss in Boots 2 (one of the more notable "spider verse style" films also made a decent amount at the box office and is widely praised by next to everyone.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >It's sequel made more than double the amount the first one did and
            Second lowest grossing Spider-Man ever
            >the first one made a decent (but not spectacular) haul at the box office
            Lowest grossing Spider-Man ever
            >with a insane surge of popularity once it hit streaming on Netflix.
            [citation needed]
            >Puss in Boots 2 (one of the more notable "spider verse style" films also made a decent amount at the box office and is widely praised by next to everyone.
            Lowest grossing Shrek ever

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >>It's sequel made more than double the amount the first one did and
              >Second lowest grossing Spider-Man ever
              Considering that Spider verse 2 cost only 100 million dollars to make and made (as I'm typing this) 689 million and something like The Amazing Spiderman 2 cost 200-300 million to make and made only 709 million it's still far in away a considerably successful spiderman film, not to mention all the praise it's received.

              >>the first one made a decent (but not spectacular) haul at the box office
              >Lowest grossing Spider-Man ever
              Lot of factors at play there.
              1. It's a Sony pictures animated film, a studio that isn't a household name with its highest grossing movie (before spider verse 2) being "the lego movie" which made a decent but not spectacular 468 million.
              2. It's an animated superhero movie, which don't tend to do as well as live action ones (i.e the Lego Batman, Batman Mask of the Phantasm)
              3. It's an animated movie that isn't particularly aimed at children which also impacted it's demographics and therefore potential box office.

              >>with a insane surge of popularity once it hit streaming on Netflix.
              >[citation needed]
              Not bullshitting when I can't say I can't find the article because all of the searches are filled with "when will across the spiderverse come to streaming" results. Either way the fact that word of mouth alone caused the sequel to make as much money as it did still proves the point that the movie received a lot of attention after it's initial release.

              >>Puss in Boots 2 (one of the more notable "spider verse style" films also made a decent amount at the box office and is widely praised by next to everyone.
              >Lowest grossing Shrek ever
              Its a sequel to a spinoff and dreamworks best movie in a while.

              Also I hate how every single spider verse hater uses "box office gross" as a legitimate method to bash the films success. Fucking Iron Giant flopped massively and its considered one of the greatest animated movies of all time.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Miles "masterpiece" sequel couldn't outgross The Amazing Spider-Man 2 even with a decade of inflation. It couldn't outgross the first Raimi-Man even with two decades of inflation. Miles is only a success with critics and critics today are a bunch of limp-wristed gays.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Christ was this all about shitting on miles? I feel like that's /co's #1 motive for shitting on Spider verse quite frankly.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                As somebody who likes Spider-Verse there's a lot of issues with them
                >Peni, Ham, and Noir are completely unneeded and do not serve the plot anyway as they're comedic bit characters
                >they cut Ganke's role as Miles' best friend and single normal person who Miles is able to confide in allowing him to grow without Peter for these bit characters
                >Tombstone and Scorpion exist only as thugs to be beat up and serve zero purpose beyond it and I can't remember a single thing Tombstone says across the entire film
                >the Spot and Miles attempting to live a normal life while juggling superhero responsibilities would have made for a much more interesting film than whatever the fuck Spider-Society is
                >Spider-Society is such a fundamental misunderstanding of Peter Parker's trauma as the entire point of his guilt is he refuses to let others come to harm and experience the pain he once experienced by being selfish and letting those he loved down by refusing to intervene
                >Miguel and Ben are so completely misrepresented in Spider-Verse they're essentially entirely different characters from their original incarnations who have a passing likeness to the originals
                >the crux of the plot in Spider-Verse is essentially bitching about how people won't accept Miles as a true Spider-Man instead of making a good Spider-Man story with Miles instead of Meta-Fiction bullshit
                >the Spider-Society exist to be humiliated and clowned on as a strawman to the Spider-Men that the filmmakers actually liked

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                sometimes i really wish tha these movies were just straight-up Miles stories with no multiverse shit included. I always prefer simpler stories in my capeshit

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                *to the idpol tokens that the filmmakers actually liked

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Miles is a shit character and his movies exist to prop him up at the expense of better characters. He and his dickriders deserve nothing but scorn.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                None of that changes the fact people don't want to see the art style compared to stuff like Minions or Mario which easily clears billions

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >"No one wants to see new animation techniques as opposed to same-y budget friendly ones"

                This is the most anti-creativity/ anti-art take I have ever seen. Imagine fucking standing behind "Minions" as a bastion of western animation...

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                see

                Spider-Verse wasn't a hit though and every movie that copied its gimmick flopped

                Big Hero 6 made more money than ATSV adjusted for inflation and you don't see anyone copying that

                The argument is about the movies in that style flopping. They look ugly, have a subversive rather than innovative take on art, have shit social themes, so I don't mind them flopping, though I'm not happy about Minions doing well either. I was hoping for a 2D revival but these cel shaded 3D movies have put a dampener on that.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >as opposed to same-y budget friendly ones"
                You mean like the "Spider-Verse" style?

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Yes, you're a gatekeeper

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The framerate thing, ok, but films like Mutant Mayhem aren't as derivative as many here claim. This is a busy, glitchy sorta techy schizo style, and the Turtles is dirty, funky, stylized. Aesthetically completely different.

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah. I like the style, but I didn't think it served Puss in Boots as well as it did Spider-Verse. I prefer to see some 2D techniques in 3D films, but imitating the low framerate action in Spider-Verse goes too far into mimicry in my opinion. Last Wish would have been better served doing its own thing.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The style worked well for Puss in boots 2, besides borrowing the whole "low framerate" shit the artstyle itself combined with the animation made it feel like a moving storybook as opposed to a comic book like Spiderverse honestly.

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I think it'd be fine if it weren't the same techniques / shaders being used. TMNT was flying a little too close for my liking, but stayed enough towards looking like "kid's shitty notebook drawings" that it still set itself apart.

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >mfw the framerate drops

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      don't for get about anxiety and panic attacks!

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        as a dude who actually has anxiety (and might have had an panic attack), this trend and the people praising it grind my fucking gears

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Because most of the time people fake it

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    TMNT had one scene with a normal framerate for some reason (could be an error) and it was like joy to my eyes, I hope the movies keep flopping so the retarded trend doesn't catch on

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No, it's an eyesore and your brand loyalty is showing.

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >peni miles posters finally got tired
    /toon/ is healing

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >corporation who paid to win it's award and praise from the media are surprised when it turns out their movie is actually a flop

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No.
    That's like saying you like cel shading in Wind Waker but hate it in Jet Set Radio

  12. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >mpreg

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *