If this movie was about a filmmaker instead of a musician, which director would be deleted from history.
If this movie was about a filmmaker instead of a musician, which director would be deleted from history.
If this movie was about a filmmaker instead of a musician, which director would be deleted from history.
WE ALL SHIT IN THE DESIGNATED STREET
THE DESIGNATED STREET
It’s got all the hits…
>WHY DONT WE POO IT IN THE ROAD
>HEY POO…
>WE ALL SHIT IN THE DESIGNATED STREETS
>THE CONTINUING STORY OF BENCHOD BILL
>I NEEDFUL YOU
>GOOD MORNING
Quality racist parody
Bravo
Hitchwiener or Spielberg
>noooooo I dislike them
Anyway they both have enough films that normal people might know that you could stretch the premise out to a full length movie
I don't think Hitchwiener could work with a modern audience that much. Maybe Psycho, but most of his other stuff wouldn't believably be great if they're remade as new today.
And yet, Disturbia was literally the best movie of 2007.
>Spielberg
100%
Hitchwiener
Spielberg
I think Spielberg could work in this premise. He's got plenty of cult movies that could be played with in the movie.
>Hitchwiener is deleted
>Tries to remake The Birds
>makes Birdemic
I don't think that would work. Painter or writer might work, but a movie isn't a one-man job, not like making a song is.
Hitchwiener though
what a stupid embarassing film
Most of the input in terms of visual presentation, editing directions comes from the director, directors also supervise and edit scripts often, or downright write the films themselves. Movie as a "collective art piece" is a meme unless the film is directed by several people in a collaboration or the film is not an art piece but a product manufactered by producers and studio executives like most capeshit.
Yeah, but you can pick up a guitar and play through most of The Beatles' hits and leave an impression to most people, while you would need to finance, film, and edit a film to show similar results
That's not what I mean, I mean you can't just present a movie without other people and money, while a guy can sing a song with a guitar by himself
moron youre not gonna be able to walk up to some Hollywood exec and just tell him what your movie will be, his first question will be are you israeli
finally a good fricking thread
the answer is scorcese because just like the beatles he was genre defining but if you look closely every fricking thing he released sounds exactly the fricking same
>released sounds exactly the fricking same
don't really like beatles but they had three songwriters with very distinct styles so most of their don't really sound the same
>they had three songwriters
ringo unironically contributed so much for every song to be iconic he deserved credit
thats written by george
>George Harrison, who assisted Starr with the song, commented: "'Octopus's Garden' is Ringo's song. It's only the second song Ringo has ever written, mind you, and it's lovely."
Please read, sir.
George was always a self-effacing man, Ringo just bangs out one chord (in the tapes and the film) while writing the song, it was George who basically completed it
this is the shittiest take I've read in like, half an hour
You're a dumb frickwit that doesn't know anything about either of the things you referenced.
Go jump off something high and die.
Walt Disney
Lucas
And the main character is played by Mike Stoklasa
>tries to make one of the famous movie which got erased from history
>israelite producers don't want to give money to a nobody
>end of the movie
powerful story
>haha what, a movie about a shark that we don't even see? a movie about an ugly alien that befriends a suburban kid? dna dinosaurs??? lmao get the frick out of my office
>There are unironically people who think The Beatles revolutionized anything about music and weren't just industry prostitutes
Lou Reed gays eternally seething but John Cale (the actual talent of the VU) said that there would be no Banana Album without Rubber Soul.
But, to be fair, Beatles wouldn't have made Rubber Soul if Bob Dylan didn't tell John Lennon that they can actually try making good music now with the fame and power they got.
>But, to be fair, Beatles wouldn't have made Rubber Soul if Bob Dylan didn't tell John Lennon that they can actually try making good music now with the fame and power they got.
Pretty sure that happened after Revolver
>“Sure,” Bob replied. “Hey - I got an idea. Why don’t you guys write a song and I’ll record it, and I’ll write a song for you to do? But I’ll write a real good song, so don’t write me no “Please Please Me” kind of thing,” he said, laughing.
> - Bob Dylan’s reactions to The Beatles playing them Revolver in May 1966.
Bob's song "Fourth Time Around" sounds like Norwegian Wood, is this by design
No, Lennon was trying be like Bob Dylan (I think he calls that time his Dylan-impersonation period) which Dylan really didn't like lmao
>some lads write some cool catchy songs that are still loved 60 years later
>AKCHUALLY THEY DIDN'T *REVOLUTIONALIZE* ANYTHING HAHA
Shut the frick up.
>t. moron who knows nothing about music
I went to UT and Majored in Music Theory
whats the most interesting thing about music you know
The most interesting thing is, in my own opinion, the history of the cello and bass tones in general. The physics of stringed instruments has always been incredibly fascinating. I mean it's the same sort of feeling as thinking about the stars and different galaxies, but these are stars you can reach out and touch and create resonating sounds with.
Lily James breasts
Where
>yfw Bob Dylan is still alive
He'll outlive us all
>Traveling Wilburys
kino
Vol 1 is unironically better than anything The Beatles ever did
lol it really isn't but I appreciate the (you) anon
I go through year-long bouts where I'm positive he's dead, and then he'll get an award, medal, knighthood, or some shit and remember that he's still alive.
>remember that he's still alive.
He has been touring non stop anon
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Never_Ending_Tour
the
>t. lusty Black
That is already a plot of a movie.
You guys saying Hitchwiener are out of your minds. As if anyone alive today is going to be any different now that The Birds never existed.
The only real answer would be Spielberg. Jaws changed a fricking ton about modern culture. He has a shitload of hits, many that are integral parts of our lexicon. I don’t see any other choice but Spielberg.
Hitchwiener could be cool if you make a film about 90 year old grandfathers
I haven't seen this movie but know the plot, does he keep the lyrics to "Saw Her Standing There" exactly the same?
Del Toro the director disappears and Del Toro the actor replaces him.
Scorsese
His movies are great and timeless
Shit Todd Philips did practically that in timeline where Scorsese exsists and still made over a billion dollars
is this actually worth watching.
it's okay, its a cool gimmick
you'll have more fun if you watch Tommy 1975 it's a bout this kid who walks in a guy fricking his mom and then becomes jesus