Because you just compared this context to American political scandals of 20 years ago?
Roman senators were probably diddling child prostitutes, getting into mass orgies and nobody would've given a shit. Why is Star Wars relying on modern standards of scandals?
yeah it's so weird that an elected politician would be afraid of her romance with a member of a clergy who swore celibacy coming to public light, George Lucas is a FRICKING HACK WHO LITERALLY RAPED MY CHILDHOOD I HATE HIM I HATE HIM I WANTED DARK VADER SLICING PEOPLE AND BEING BADASS I HATE YOU LUCAS I HATE YOU I HATE YOU AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
>with a member of a clergy who swore celibacy coming to public light,
I don't remember this scene in the movie. Padme can't frick because she's a senator (this makes sense in Lucas' head). The movie doesn't mention anything about Jedi not being allowed to frick.
>The movie doesn't mention anything about Jedi not being allowed to frick
That's rule number 1 of being a jedi in the prequels dipshit. None of them have wives, and they're all sworn to celibacy. Would have been more realistic if they were all child diddlers though.
Literally never stated.
All we’re ever told is they are not allowed to love.
After his divorce I’d have thought lucas would know you don’t need to love to have hot sex.
Also, maybe stop wearing sexy revealing wienerteasing outfits while you blue balls “anakin”
You're wrong it was nowhere stipulated as a rule, matter of fact the movies give you all the hints that sex is allowed but getting a wife or a kid, being attached and possessive isn't.
Jedi's are nothing like monks aside from the vague connection of the attire, they're more like Freemasons.
>hormones are new age schizo shit
How did the world come to this?
https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/275795#what_is_oxytocin
https://www.healthline.com/health/love-hormone
https://www.businessinsider.com/what-happens-to-your-brain-after-sex-2018-6
https://people.howstuffworks.com/love7.htm
The bondage suit represents her alligience to a seemingly just - perhaps less just in spite and *more in virtue of* - an ominous 'dark force' that resides within the 'good' bureaucracy of her life as a representative to the galactic senate, despite the fact that her participating disrupts the enactment of the failed prophecy. People might critique the choice of clothing here, saying it's on the nose. Really, it's more than that. I'd wager this is one of the most visible 'fourth wall' breaks of all time - the whole point is thus: Anakin KNEW this, she didn't have to say a word - that little peep is her defenses falling, prefiguring her fate, the kiss with anakin is the senates 'breaking of chains' that also puts into motion consequences contrary to the original intent, - the clones (lea and luke being twins) - just like Hitler broke the chain only for germany to be dragged through the mud for 50+ years afterward, his land decimated. This is why George cast not just one, but TWO israeli actresses to play the main female leads. Don't get me wrong, George is far from a Nazi - I believe this casting choice is the MOST intentional decision of his entire ouvre, as if he were playing 'toy soldiers' with the precedings of the 20th century, before the empire can coat up in black leather, the ceremonial mother takes the first step. Padme's bondage suit wasn't just a prefigurement of vader, but his trap. Any other outfit wouldn't have worked. It was chosen, by the force, that padme would make darth vader real by luring him into the darkside before she could even bear his children. Not by breaking allegiance, but by sporting such a sultry visage.
George Lucas thinks it's illegal to have sex. Always has.
Try try as hard as you can you’ll never too slave prostitute leia
>a sitting galactic senator fricking her teenage bodyguard while they are supposed to be hiding from assassins
Maybe it’s just cause zoomers live in this degenerate time but such things 20 years ago were scandalous
Why does an intergalactic senate that existed a bajillion years ago work on the same logic of modern American senate politics?
it doesn't, what gave you the idea?
Because you just compared this context to American political scandals of 20 years ago?
Roman senators were probably diddling child prostitutes, getting into mass orgies and nobody would've given a shit. Why is Star Wars relying on modern standards of scandals?
>you just compared this context to American political scandals
Where did he mention Americans?
Obsessed
When they first meet they were 9-10 ( Anakin ) respectively 14.
When they fricked Anakin was in his 20s, do the math.
yeah it's so weird that an elected politician would be afraid of her romance with a member of a clergy who swore celibacy coming to public light, George Lucas is a FRICKING HACK WHO LITERALLY RAPED MY CHILDHOOD I HATE HIM I HATE HIM I WANTED DARK VADER SLICING PEOPLE AND BEING BADASS I HATE YOU LUCAS I HATE YOU I HATE YOU AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
>with a member of a clergy who swore celibacy coming to public light,
I don't remember this scene in the movie. Padme can't frick because she's a senator (this makes sense in Lucas' head). The movie doesn't mention anything about Jedi not being allowed to frick.
>The movie doesn't mention anything about Jedi not being allowed to frick
That's rule number 1 of being a jedi in the prequels dipshit. None of them have wives, and they're all sworn to celibacy. Would have been more realistic if they were all child diddlers though.
Literally never stated.
All we’re ever told is they are not allowed to love.
After his divorce I’d have thought lucas would know you don’t need to love to have hot sex.
Also, maybe stop wearing sexy revealing wienerteasing outfits while you blue balls “anakin”
Where do they say that though
Leave then
>Would have been more realistic if they were all child diddlers though.
not explicitly stated, but heavily implied
You're wrong it was nowhere stipulated as a rule, matter of fact the movies give you all the hints that sex is allowed but getting a wife or a kid, being attached and possessive isn't.
Jedi's are nothing like monks aside from the vague connection of the attire, they're more like Freemasons.
>he thinks it's possible to frick without attachment
The modern world is so brainwashed it's unreal.
Frick off to your new age blog schizo.
>hormones are new age schizo shit
How did the world come to this?
https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/275795#what_is_oxytocin
https://www.healthline.com/health/love-hormone
https://www.businessinsider.com/what-happens-to-your-brain-after-sex-2018-6
https://people.howstuffworks.com/love7.htm
Jedi are a gay order, like the Templars
>gay order
like the LGBT?
Why would she care, it’s not like she was elected or anything. She was royalty and handed the role because of her family lineage. Same as her daughter
All I want in this life is Padme Amidala in that outfit, spreadeagled in tight bondage for me to tickle torture daily. Is it too much to ask for?
>I'm married, Anakin. I can't.
That would have been too deep for the prequel audience, I guess.
George Lucas didn't understand Romeo and Juliet
You don't understand Romeo and Juliet
What's that got anything to do with romeo and juliet you dumb tard?
The bondage suit represents her alligience to a seemingly just - perhaps less just in spite and *more in virtue of* - an ominous 'dark force' that resides within the 'good' bureaucracy of her life as a representative to the galactic senate, despite the fact that her participating disrupts the enactment of the failed prophecy. People might critique the choice of clothing here, saying it's on the nose. Really, it's more than that. I'd wager this is one of the most visible 'fourth wall' breaks of all time - the whole point is thus: Anakin KNEW this, she didn't have to say a word - that little peep is her defenses falling, prefiguring her fate, the kiss with anakin is the senates 'breaking of chains' that also puts into motion consequences contrary to the original intent, - the clones (lea and luke being twins) - just like Hitler broke the chain only for germany to be dragged through the mud for 50+ years afterward, his land decimated. This is why George cast not just one, but TWO israeli actresses to play the main female leads. Don't get me wrong, George is far from a Nazi - I believe this casting choice is the MOST intentional decision of his entire ouvre, as if he were playing 'toy soldiers' with the precedings of the 20th century, before the empire can coat up in black leather, the ceremonial mother takes the first step. Padme's bondage suit wasn't just a prefigurement of vader, but his trap. Any other outfit wouldn't have worked. It was chosen, by the force, that padme would make darth vader real by luring him into the darkside before she could even bear his children. Not by breaking allegiance, but by sporting such a sultry visage.
She meant: "This is some of the worst writing in cinematic history."