Why? They got sanctioned and lost. I don’t like blacks moving to actual civilized countries but it’s kind of hard to say that the whites in Rhodesia weren’t doing the same thing to them.
>taming uncharted territory through skill and a thirst for adventure >moving into a country to take advantage of welfare
If you can't tell the difference you'll never get it.
>Bantus had lived there for centuries anon
Cool. Post one of their charts from before white men took on the burden to bring them a better way of life.
>muh white man's burden
why though? for hating Black folk so much, you sure seem eager to want to interact with them
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
Says who? I think the colonists should have eradicated all of them immediately. Trying to integrate them into civilization was a mistake. Humanity can't move forward without cutting off its infected parts.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
Says the guy whose using his time to cry and whine on an imageboard. Man, people's egoes are the funniest thing. I guess you see yourself as some sort of savior too that requires worship too?
>The two are mutually exclusive.
Correct. One is the heroic plight of bringing civilization where there was none before while the other is taking advantage of the civilization of others have built. Adventure vs welfare. Simple as.
neither are good. the less contact whites have with blacks the better.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
Nope. Adventuring in Africa has always been based.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
I don't underestimate their achievements, but at the end of the day it is still a case of white people moving closer to black people and giving black people the means to move closer to whites.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
Don't care. It was based.
What charts? They lived there for years and smelted iron and herded cattle. Pretty much what Scandinavians did for centuries until people from southern Europe showed up.
>What charts?
So it was adventure into uncharted territory then. I accept your concession.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>moving closer to blacks, lifting their living standards enough so that they could travel internationally, and leaving behind a legacy that can easily and endlessly be exploited by those who seek to harm whites is based
no.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
Can you please just shut the frick up, you small souled little hobbit frick?
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>not recognizing an untapped underclass living on mountains of resources >so infested by libtardism he projects it back into his understanding of history
NGMI, pleb. NGMI
The Bantu expansion is actually pretty interesting
There is linguistic evidence for this expansion – a great many of the languages which are spoken across sub-Equatorial Africa are remarkably similar to each other, suggesting the common cultural origin of their original speakers. The linguistic core of the Bantu languages, which comprise a branch of the Atlantic-Congo language family, was located in the southern regions of Cameroon.[8] Genetic evidence also indicates that there was a large human migration from central Africa, with varying levels of admixture with local population.[4][9]
The expansion is believed to have taken place in at least two waves, between about 4,000 and 2,000 years ago (approximately 2,000 BC to AD 1). Linguistic analysis suggests that the expansion proceeded in two directions: the first went across or along the Northern border of the Congo forest region (towards East Africa),[10] and the second – and possibly others – went south along Africa's Atlantic coast into what is now the Republic of the Congo, Gabon, Cameroon, Democratic Republic of the Congo, and Angola, or inland along the many south-to-north flowing rivers of the Congo River system. The expansion reached South Africa, probably as early as AD 300
neither are good. the less contact whites have with blacks the better.
This
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>none exist >I actually know nothing about the subject >I'll copy/paste Wikipedia
Lol, gay.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
What charts? They lived there for years and smelted iron and herded cattle. Pretty much what Scandinavians did for centuries until people from southern Europe showed up.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>WE WUZ JUST LIKE SCANDINAVIANS AND SHEEIT >WE WUZ SMELTING IRON!!! >YOU IS JUST LIKE US
Does this one still work on anybody?
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>acktully, Wikipedia says they were doing something humans were doing 4000 years before so they had civilization when Europeans arrived
Lol
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
Except that they had no writing system, wasn't nearly as advanced in their metallurgy and didn't have the ship building technology to explore the world lol
not sure why you're choosing to die on that hill tbh.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
Who gives a shit if cannibalistic, primitive warrior people fricked an area up first? They've misused a beautiful, lush continent. The world would be better off without them squatting there.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
I don't consider Africa beautiful, and the demographic/geographic realities of the situation meant a white settlement was doomed from the start. I'd prefer if whites had had no contact at all with Africans.
Post pre-European bantu charts and maps of the region
blacks won, whites got kicked out. the strong while the weak make silly doodle on obscure corners of the internet.
Why are you talking like some right wing homosexual “the strong vghhh the weak vghh”
Why? They got sanctioned and lost. I don’t like blacks moving to actual civilized countries but it’s kind of hard to say that the whites in Rhodesia weren’t doing the same thing to them.
Why are you pretending to be le both sides when you’re some lefty cuck. Total Black person death. It doesn’t matter if whites do it too, because whites are the good guys.
>moving closer to blacks, lifting their living standards enough so that they could travel internationally, and leaving behind a legacy that can easily and endlessly be exploited by those who seek to harm whites is based
no.
post face
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
Can you please just shut the frick up, you small souled little hobbit frick?
>not recognizing an untapped underclass living on mountains of resources >so infested by libtardism he projects it back into his understanding of history
NGMI, pleb. NGMI
It would undeniably be better for Europe if blacks in Africa were left like pic related, and if we hadn't shared inventions with them which led to their massive population growth.
We have nothing to show for Rhodes life but a bunch of angry shitskins in Western universities demanding "decolonization." Unless you've inherited some of that DeBeers diamond wealth, of course.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>not recognizing an untapped underclass living on mountains of resources >so infested by libtardism he projects it back into his understanding of history
NGMI, pleb. NGMI
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
list a single benefit you've received from African colonization >pro tip >you can't
It has been a net negative for all but a few very rich white families.
This has nothing at all to do with liberalism. I simply recognize that blacks benefited more from African colonization (and continue to do so) than whites generally did or do.
A country like Poland that never had any African colonies doesn't have to deal with the baggage that countries like France and Britain do. It is much harder to guilt the Polish population into demographic suicide because of this. Countries that didn't have African slaves don't have the problems the USA does.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>not recognizing an untapped underclass living on mountains of resources >so infested by libtardism he projects it back into his understanding of history
NGMI, pleb. NGMI
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>pro tip >you can't
still waiting for some example of African colonization being anything other than a continued nuisance for the vast majority of whites. We could have done (and were doing) just as well without it, and we could have saved ourselves a lot of trouble that we still have to deal with to the present day.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>not recognizing an untapped underclass living on mountains of resources >so infested by libtardism he projects it back into his understanding of history
NGMI, pleb. NGMI
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
weak bruv. how did this "untapped underclass" benefit most whites, rather than hang an albatross around their necks that still remains to this day? Go on, lets hear the big-brained take.
This is the American slavery issue all over again. It would undeniably be better if American southerners had employed their own people to pick their own cotton. A few whites (like Rhodes) got very rich while the rest of us are saddled with all the downsides of African contact & colonization.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>It would undeniably be better if American southerners had employed their own people to pick their own cotton.
Yeah, but southerns are uneducated and moronic with no forethought.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>not recognizing an untapped underclass living on mountains of resources >so infested by libtardism he projects it back into his understanding of history
NGMI, pleb. NGMI
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
as expected.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
We should just kill em all. Nuke africa and build a huge solar power plant there instead.
Nuke india and the middle east too while we’re at it.
Funnily enough, that's how ZANU managed to win the war against a better-equipped better-educated and objectively superior enemy.
They convinced the world that they needed to destroy the most prosperous country in Africa because it was racist, and the world sat back and watched because they were too afraid in the modern world to be called racist, even if it meant that they were dooming millions of lives to be starved out, shot, hacked apart, and burned to death.
It turns out that the most powerful weapon against civilization is globalism.
>the noble savages weren't doing real communism
Lol
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
Communism would’ve certainly helped, the USSR was known throughout Africa for assisting the natives in non colonialist, imperialist fashion
>No, it was the sanctions, it was nothing to do with Bobby genociding tribes he didn't like and thinking printing one billion dollar bank notes would make his people rich
Sanctions make it to where there’s less to go around, so yes… do you know what sanctions are anon?
Rhodesia was more prosperous while being under significantly more sanctions than Zimbabwe. Mugabe was just that bad.
You know you're lying, but you got me to reply.
>betray the crown >expect the civilized world to respect you and not be considered the judas of nations.
maybe if they had actually played the game and not been autistic spergs they would still live there.
>betray the crown
Hilarious to pretend that's what it was about. The UDI was because the British government was making it clear they were going to frick the white people there and they refused to get fricked.
>No, it was the sanctions, it was nothing to do with Bobby genociding tribes he didn't like and thinking printing one billion dollar bank notes would make his people rich
The whole world embargo'd White Rhodesia. The only exceptions were Portuguese Angola/Mozambique, Israel, and South Africa (who abandoned them)
The whole world worshipped Zimbabwe, including both sides of the Cold War
>take a random rabble of 50 white people >cut them off from all civilization, infrastructure, anything >drop them in the middle of nowhere in Africa >within a few decades they have functioning utilities, economy, a schooling system, general wellness, security, and prosperity
>be Rhodesian, fight for your country alongside other blacks, the west calls you racist and turns it's back on you when you're way outnumbered, sanctions you, no war crimes or atrocities on from your side are committed >be Israel, get a pass for killing many civilians and deny them food and water, kill journalists and aid workers, openly call for the genocide of Palestinians >here's money for more rockets to kill kids with!
how unlucky for Rhodesians they don't control the media and are embedded in western governments.
The communist groups started targeting civilian areas, so the ruling class decided that since the people were suffering, and the whole world had forsaken them, that it was better to surrender power to the country and leave to minimize casualties.
In theater, this would be called dramatic irony. In reality, it's just called a very bad decision.
the fatal flaw of whites is the unwillingness to do your own shit labor.
Whites were 6% of the population in 1970. they could have easily partitioned the nation into white and black areas.
White Rhodesia and Black Zimbabwe. 2 separate and independent nations. South Africa should have done the same. who cares if blacks have more access to resources. it isn't like they know how to utilize them, so you can easily come in with FDI and extract what you like from their ultra corrupt governments. it's literally what every country does. and before somebody wants to b***h about whites, the Chinese do exactly the same thing and don't even pretend about how they're fricking them over.
In a based world we'd have kino celebrating the Rhodesian Bush War.
Why? They got sanctioned and lost. I don’t like blacks moving to actual civilized countries but it’s kind of hard to say that the whites in Rhodesia weren’t doing the same thing to them.
>taming uncharted territory through skill and a thirst for adventure
>moving into a country to take advantage of welfare
If you can't tell the difference you'll never get it.
The two are mutually exclusive. You can't go to Africa and frick up their half-functioning economy and then complain when they flee the country.
>frick up
The only rare nice parts of Africa are the parts where whites built cities, you fricking moron
>muh white man's burden
why though? for hating Black folk so much, you sure seem eager to want to interact with them
Says who? I think the colonists should have eradicated all of them immediately. Trying to integrate them into civilization was a mistake. Humanity can't move forward without cutting off its infected parts.
Says the guy whose using his time to cry and whine on an imageboard. Man, people's egoes are the funniest thing. I guess you see yourself as some sort of savior too that requires worship too?
>The two are mutually exclusive.
Correct. One is the heroic plight of bringing civilization where there was none before while the other is taking advantage of the civilization of others have built. Adventure vs welfare. Simple as.
neither are good. the less contact whites have with blacks the better.
Nope. Adventuring in Africa has always been based.
I don't underestimate their achievements, but at the end of the day it is still a case of white people moving closer to black people and giving black people the means to move closer to whites.
Don't care. It was based.
>What charts?
So it was adventure into uncharted territory then. I accept your concession.
>moving closer to blacks, lifting their living standards enough so that they could travel internationally, and leaving behind a legacy that can easily and endlessly be exploited by those who seek to harm whites is based
no.
Can you please just shut the frick up, you small souled little hobbit frick?
>not recognizing an untapped underclass living on mountains of resources
>so infested by libtardism he projects it back into his understanding of history
NGMI, pleb. NGMI
The Bantu expansion is actually pretty interesting
There is linguistic evidence for this expansion – a great many of the languages which are spoken across sub-Equatorial Africa are remarkably similar to each other, suggesting the common cultural origin of their original speakers. The linguistic core of the Bantu languages, which comprise a branch of the Atlantic-Congo language family, was located in the southern regions of Cameroon.[8] Genetic evidence also indicates that there was a large human migration from central Africa, with varying levels of admixture with local population.[4][9]
The expansion is believed to have taken place in at least two waves, between about 4,000 and 2,000 years ago (approximately 2,000 BC to AD 1). Linguistic analysis suggests that the expansion proceeded in two directions: the first went across or along the Northern border of the Congo forest region (towards East Africa),[10] and the second – and possibly others – went south along Africa's Atlantic coast into what is now the Republic of the Congo, Gabon, Cameroon, Democratic Republic of the Congo, and Angola, or inland along the many south-to-north flowing rivers of the Congo River system. The expansion reached South Africa, probably as early as AD 300
This
>none exist
>I actually know nothing about the subject
>I'll copy/paste Wikipedia
Lol, gay.
What charts? They lived there for years and smelted iron and herded cattle. Pretty much what Scandinavians did for centuries until people from southern Europe showed up.
>WE WUZ JUST LIKE SCANDINAVIANS AND SHEEIT
>WE WUZ SMELTING IRON!!!
>YOU IS JUST LIKE US
Does this one still work on anybody?
>acktully, Wikipedia says they were doing something humans were doing 4000 years before so they had civilization when Europeans arrived
Lol
Except that they had no writing system, wasn't nearly as advanced in their metallurgy and didn't have the ship building technology to explore the world lol
no?
watch me heh
>uncharted
Bantus had lived there for centuries anon
This, it’s especially true with America and Israel fricking up the Middle East and then getting mad about the refugee outflows.
>Bantus had lived there for centuries anon
Cool. Post one of their charts from before white men took on the burden to bring them a better way of life.
not sure why you're choosing to die on that hill tbh.
Who gives a shit if cannibalistic, primitive warrior people fricked an area up first? They've misused a beautiful, lush continent. The world would be better off without them squatting there.
I don't consider Africa beautiful, and the demographic/geographic realities of the situation meant a white settlement was doomed from the start. I'd prefer if whites had had no contact at all with Africans.
Thanks for sharing homosexual
go and live in Africa if you love it so much
Post pre-European bantu charts and maps of the region
Why are you talking like some right wing homosexual “the strong vghhh the weak vghh”
Why are you pretending to be le both sides when you’re some lefty cuck. Total Black person death. It doesn’t matter if whites do it too, because whites are the good guys.
post face
It would undeniably be better for Europe if blacks in Africa were left like pic related, and if we hadn't shared inventions with them which led to their massive population growth.
We have nothing to show for Rhodes life but a bunch of angry shitskins in Western universities demanding "decolonization." Unless you've inherited some of that DeBeers diamond wealth, of course.
list a single benefit you've received from African colonization
>pro tip
>you can't
It has been a net negative for all but a few very rich white families.
This has nothing at all to do with liberalism. I simply recognize that blacks benefited more from African colonization (and continue to do so) than whites generally did or do.
A country like Poland that never had any African colonies doesn't have to deal with the baggage that countries like France and Britain do. It is much harder to guilt the Polish population into demographic suicide because of this. Countries that didn't have African slaves don't have the problems the USA does.
>pro tip
>you can't
still waiting for some example of African colonization being anything other than a continued nuisance for the vast majority of whites. We could have done (and were doing) just as well without it, and we could have saved ourselves a lot of trouble that we still have to deal with to the present day.
weak bruv. how did this "untapped underclass" benefit most whites, rather than hang an albatross around their necks that still remains to this day? Go on, lets hear the big-brained take.
This is the American slavery issue all over again. It would undeniably be better if American southerners had employed their own people to pick their own cotton. A few whites (like Rhodes) got very rich while the rest of us are saddled with all the downsides of African contact & colonization.
>It would undeniably be better if American southerners had employed their own people to pick their own cotton.
Yeah, but southerns are uneducated and moronic with no forethought.
as expected.
We should just kill em all. Nuke africa and build a huge solar power plant there instead.
Nuke india and the middle east too while we’re at it.
>bantus
Lmao as if they're somehow better
You clearly know nothing about Rhodesia if you believe it was a battle between races.
Funnily enough, that's how ZANU managed to win the war against a better-equipped better-educated and objectively superior enemy.
They convinced the world that they needed to destroy the most prosperous country in Africa because it was racist, and the world sat back and watched because they were too afraid in the modern world to be called racist, even if it meant that they were dooming millions of lives to be starved out, shot, hacked apart, and burned to death.
It turns out that the most powerful weapon against civilization is globalism.
Lol so blacks had a high functioning society? What was it like the first and only one ever?
Never go full moron, anon.
The Boers were there first, most of South Africa are Bantu latecomers.
You can blame Bush for Iraq and Afghan but not the Zimbabwean war
?t=5
blacks won, whites got kicked out. the strong while the weak make silly doodle on obscure corners of the internet.
>blacks won
Really? Lol
i don't see any white people in that picture. is it from the UK?
>country that got sanctioned for years as revenge for defeating whitey is impoverished
Woah…
>the noble savages weren't doing real communism
Lol
Communism would’ve certainly helped, the USSR was known throughout Africa for assisting the natives in non colonialist, imperialist fashion
Sanctions make it to where there’s less to go around, so yes… do you know what sanctions are anon?
>Communism would’ve certainly helped
moron confirmed. Didn't bother reading the rest.
The USSR did aid Mugabe the whole time.
Rhodesia was more prosperous while being under significantly more sanctions than Zimbabwe. Mugabe was just that bad.
You know you're lying, but you got me to reply.
>betray the crown
Hilarious to pretend that's what it was about. The UDI was because the British government was making it clear they were going to frick the white people there and they refused to get fricked.
>Communism would’ve certainly helped
>Communism
>helped
>No, it was the sanctions, it was nothing to do with Bobby genociding tribes he didn't like and thinking printing one billion dollar bank notes would make his people rich
Found the israelite
The whole world embargo'd White Rhodesia. The only exceptions were Portuguese Angola/Mozambique, Israel, and South Africa (who abandoned them)
The whole world worshipped Zimbabwe, including both sides of the Cold War
>blacks won
>blacks turned formerly prosperous nation into poverty stricken shithole... again
>turn "the breadbasket of africa" into a starving shithole
>cry for the white farmers to return to fix things 50yrs later
"won"
>blacks won
With overwhelming global support.
>the strong
They inherited a turnkey country and somehow went back to starvation.
I can't wait to see your cope when China does worse to Africa than what any European colony ever did.
We say "Bazinga" now, don't we?
ONE FIRE FIGHTS ONE FIRE
ONE NAIL ONE NAIL
nice edit
NOTHING
NOTHING
NOTHING
NOTHING
also, I had GT with Jerome.
We say Schwarzland now, don't we?
No Ivan this doesn't agitate race violence either.
it was a better time
Nice to meet you, I'm from Atlantis.
Fascism has failed every single time it has ever been tried
>America is fascist btw
*has brought prosperity anywhere it's been tried
>take a random rabble of 50 white people
>cut them off from all civilization, infrastructure, anything
>drop them in the middle of nowhere in Africa
>within a few decades they have functioning utilities, economy, a schooling system, general wellness, security, and prosperity
scientists HATE this one neat trick
thats a rare green area tho
Africa would be paradise on Earth if it was populated by only whites.
twenty ninth post best post
His pidgin is still the funniest moment in cinema.
>Take your blatt as back to Zimbabwe
>I'm from Rhodesia Black person
>it's a bitter white rage thread
why wont you people just go outside and speak to white girls, it works like a charm for everyone else.
>white girls
yuck. i wish there were black girls in my country
>be Rhodesian, fight for your country alongside other blacks, the west calls you racist and turns it's back on you when you're way outnumbered, sanctions you, no war crimes or atrocities on from your side are committed
>be Israel, get a pass for killing many civilians and deny them food and water, kill journalists and aid workers, openly call for the genocide of Palestinians
>here's money for more rockets to kill kids with!
how unlucky for Rhodesians they don't control the media and are embedded in western governments.
>betray the crown
>expect the civilized world to respect you and not be considered the judas of nations.
maybe if they had actually played the game and not been autistic spergs they would still live there.
Harold Wilson is not the Crown. And while he may not have been an actual soviet agent he sure as frick acted like it.
the crown
heh
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1946_British_Embassy_bombing
Rhodesia lost. Why is it so celebrated? I'm a race realist but we need more successful nations as role models.
why is your pic ruined by chromatic aberration?
>Oy bruv, did you just dead name Zimbabwe?
This movie changed my view of DiCaprio. Really nailed that role and the weapon handling.
Danny Archer is literally me
ONE FIRE FIGHTS ONE FIRE
we say Aelia Capitolina now, don't we?
T I A
omg, they're firing weapons at unarmed people while wearing business attire. I am an operator now.
>at unarmed people
They just tried to rob an armored car and their truck exploded because the white guys shot a box of Molotov wienertails
being white in south africa is no fricking joke
>I'm Cecil Rhodes.
>We say Nig-Nig Poo Poo land now dont we??
WALOMBE
why did rhodesia fail, who betrayed who? what went down?
>why did rhodesia fail
me
>who betrayed who?
me
>what went down?
me
who betrayed them, no way whites with guns were defeated by a bunch of blacks from the stone age
The communist groups started targeting civilian areas, so the ruling class decided that since the people were suffering, and the whole world had forsaken them, that it was better to surrender power to the country and leave to minimize casualties.
In theater, this would be called dramatic irony. In reality, it's just called a very bad decision.
the fatal flaw of whites is the unwillingness to do your own shit labor.
Whites were 6% of the population in 1970. they could have easily partitioned the nation into white and black areas.
White Rhodesia and Black Zimbabwe. 2 separate and independent nations. South Africa should have done the same. who cares if blacks have more access to resources. it isn't like they know how to utilize them, so you can easily come in with FDI and extract what you like from their ultra corrupt governments. it's literally what every country does. and before somebody wants to b***h about whites, the Chinese do exactly the same thing and don't even pretend about how they're fricking them over.