In 20 years, will people retroactively start liking the sequel trilogy too?

In 20 years, will people retroactively start liking the sequel trilogy too?

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Why would they?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Same reason people are now defending the prequels - childhood nostalgia.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >nostalgia
        Now try it without autistic buzzwords

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        the sequels were made for and enjoyed by man-children, not children
        children these days like peppa pig and minecraft, they couldn't care less about movies

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >man-children
          Sci-Fi and fantasy, in general, are right now and have always been designed for man-children. I realized this too late.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        People fundamentally misunderstand the criticism levied against the PT and the ST. It's not the same kind of criticism.

        What most people have a problem in the sequels is NOT the content (except Jar Jar and midichlorians maybe) but the execution of the prequel trilogy. Noone hates the IDEA of a republic turning itself into an empire through intrigue and conspiracy, or the tragic fall of Anakin to the dark side as he's being manipulated. they dislike the pacing, the acting or dislike the use of bluescreens and CGI (which in this day and age of marvel movies and the sequel trilogy I wish people would complain about) but ultimately it's a coherent, well-thought out story. So after a while you'll forget about the CGI and really the only thing that stays with you is the story. Which is why the prequels seem to "redeem" themselves after so long, because the main thing they offer is the completion of the story.

        The Sequel Trilogy on the other hand commits a whole different set of sins. It's the IDEA of this new empire rising basically undoing the OT and effectively retconning everything from Vader's sacrifice, Luke's triumph over the dark side. The entire story of the trilogy is completely incompatible with the OT, unlike the prequels. Even those that pretend to like the sequel trilogy secretly know it's garbage. They know TFA is just ANH remade, they know it makes no sense for the fallen order to exist in the first place. We all do.

        At least today, the sequels benefit from online memes and viral marketing and toy sales. 10 years from now that will be gone. It might already be over. Noone will remember the sequels fondly, especially the ones that got to know these movies as their first star wars movies.

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    a lot of morons are brain washed into thinking hating disney wars make you racist

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The prequels had good designs, an excellent soundtrack, and some genuinely good moments, e.g Order 66, duel of the fates, etc. What do the sequels have? You may call Anakin building 3PO stupid, but nothing beats the sheer moronation of the sequels.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      This. I would also add that Lucas actually planned out the prequels, whereas Disney was flying by the seat of their pants and changed directors twice.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Lucas actually planned out the prequels
        Sort of. In the sense that the ultimate outcome was predetermined he was always boxed in, but the movies themselves were made as he went (and sometimes revised even during production).

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          kids loved the prequels when they came out, nobody loved the sequels except monetized youtube critics that needed to protect their association with Disney

          The kids of the 70s and 80s took their kids and themselves to support Lucas' prequels. The associative merchandise reflects this. Disney nu wars can and will never say the same.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Or the sheer lack of creativity
      >all the aliens are generic blobs - almost no OT aliens return; destroying the world building
      >it’s an xwing - but it’s black!
      >it’s a tie fighter - but with a gunner seat!
      >it’s an ATAT - but it walks on its knuckles!
      >it’s a star destroyer - but it has big guns!
      >it’s a Death Star - but actually a planet!
      >it’s Hoth - but it’s salt instead of snow!
      >it’s the emperor - but in a gold robe!
      >it’s the emperor - but wait not let’s just reuse him anyway!
      Fricking lazy ass fricks.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Right, the PT had a lot of problems but it (the Republic and the Clone Wars) was a new "sandbox" to build new stories games etc from. The ST was an OT remake, instead of something new to carry the IP years from now

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      This. Also, good or bad, at least they told their own stories, instead of just rehashing the OT.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      anakin building c-3p0 only doesn't make sense if you're an ot boomer
      >dude darth vader built c-3p0 the galaxy is so small
      it makes sense when you watch it in chronological order
      >droids belong to Leia because they used to belong to Anakin and Obi-wan
      they say nothing about Luke and Leia being siblings though
      >the princeess I went to go rescue just happens to be my sister.
      >dude imagine a little kid han solo in the prequels amirite (which george didn't do because he knew it would be fricking dumb still doesn't give George any credit where it is due)

      This. I would also add that Lucas actually planned out the prequels, whereas Disney was flying by the seat of their pants and changed directors twice.

      Jar Jar Abrams was rushing to finish the script well into filming taking place since he fired the other screen writer who was making something more akin to George's plans but JJ wanted to take the direction of the movies away from the prequels. OT boomers hating on the prequels are directly responsible for the outcome of the sequels

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >anakin building c-3p0 only doesn't make sense if you're an ot boomer
        Incredible delusion.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Prequel Merchandise Made Billions! Try again Disney Shill

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Somehow Chuck is now Sneed

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Millennial kids generally enjoyed and were invested in the prequels.
      Zoomer kids mostly don't give a shit about the sequel trilogy.
      So when they grow up I think by and large they won't care about it.

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    it's all downhill culturally for the foreseeable future so yeah probably

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >KOTOR
    >Republics Commando
    There's tons of good Prequel Era stuff besides the movies. More than enough. What do the Sequels have in comparison?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >we had so many fricking games every year from the 90s-2005 ish
      >disney gave all the rights to EA and they've made nothing but pay to win garbage with battlefront

      Right, the PT had a lot of problems but it (the Republic and the Clone Wars) was a new "sandbox" to build new stories games etc from. The ST was an OT remake, instead of something new to carry the IP years from now

      >Jedi Knight series
      >KOTOR series
      >Battlefront series
      >Republic Commando

      Frick, man. Will Star Wars vidya ever be that good again? All we have now is some homosexual Dark Souls clone.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Oh no!
        And we used to have
        >Quake 3 clone with a lightsaber
        >Generic Bioware game that got old on release
        >Casual Battlefield clone
        >Casual 3 hour long Halo clone

        Frick, man. Star Wars vidya used to be so good...

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          You couldn't have outed yourself as more of a braindead zoomer if you tried.

          >Quake 3 clone with a lightsaber
          So, literally nothing like Quake 3. The lightsaber combat is completely different to Quake gameplay.

          >Generic Bioware game that got old on release
          Lol. You were too young to remember the hype around this series. KOTOR put Bioware on the map.

          >Casual Battlefield clone
          I'll give you this one, but it was fun.

          >Casual 3 hour long Halo clone
          It plays nothing like Halo. For one, it's actually not a console baby aim assist shitfest.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >So, literally nothing like Quake 3. The lightsaber combat is completely different to Quake gameplay.
            It literally reuses Quake assets. It is literally Quake clone.
            >Lol. You were too young to remember the hype around this series.
            Only because it was Star Wars. The game was garbage console shit. DnD mechanics in it were laughable.
            >It plays nothing like Halo.
            Yeah, it's worse.
            >For one, it's actually not a console baby aim assist shitfest.
            Republic Commando is literally console baby game with no real gunplay and any advanced FPS mechanics whatsoever. And it's also 3 hours long.

            The point is, I don't think there's ever been an original SW game that was good. All of it is casualized copy pasta with SW skin slapped onto it, which is the main selling point. As videogames, they were never that good, and whatever it is they were aping was always better.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              have a nice day sperg. 2 out of 4 of those games were masterpieces.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                nostalgia is hell of a drug, huh

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I love the Dark Forces/Jedi Knight games in particular but this is true.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Something being true doesn't make it relevant. The Great Gatsby uses some of the same words and letters as the The Catcher in the Rye. Would you say one is a clone of the other?

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              What a terrible comparison.

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >retroactively
    the prequels were actually liked at the time by people who weren't OT babies

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Super financially successful too. If people hated it, there wouldn't be entire sections of toy stores dedicated to them that sell like hotcakes. I don't think anyone can deny they made big bank.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I had like 15 Chancellor Valorum action figures
        I just wanted more and more of the cool spear for my stormtroopers
        I don't know why my parents kept letting me get the same one

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      so actual babies?

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Only when Yiddsney puts out an even worse trilogy

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    No... For several reasons
    >It wasn't made by George Lucas
    >It wasn't released in a period where the minds of people who watched it weren't tainted by zoomer tiktok/youtube/twitter internet
    >it wasn't memed on as much (in a charmful comedic way, rather than downright hating on it)
    >they'll still need to release a trilogy which ends up being worse than the sequels

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    yeah im sure.. that black janitor's whos name I can't even remember, I'm sure his toy will sell like hot cakes one day

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    No because the prequels had cool designs, comics, video games and such while the shitquels have none of that.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >we had so many fricking games every year from the 90s-2005 ish
      >disney gave all the rights to EA and they've made nothing but pay to win garbage with battlefront

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >almost 20 star shit threads in catalog
    what the frick is going on today

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >RLM reviewed the Obi Wan show and outed themselves as Disney shills
      >people point out that their positions on the Prequels can't possibly be trusted considering their track record of abhorrent taste
      >RLM fanboys start seething and spamming

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        looks more like people seething about rlm to me

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          RLM fanboys are the most insufferable people on the internet, so seething over them makes a lot of sense

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        didn't they all say it was bad but but mike and rich are just morons who like eating shit sometimes?

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Don't let this thread distract you from the fact that in 1998, The Undertaker threw Mankind off of Hell In A Cell, sending him plummeting 16 feet through an announcer's table.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      AS GOD IS MY WITNESS HE IS BROKEN IN HALF

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    People already like them, they'll just become less drowned out by the people that hate them

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      No one likes Disney's puke! Their merchandise never sold where as the prequel merchandise made billions.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >People already like them
      twitter doesn't count cuz they pretend to like anything out of spite

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    True fans supported George and so much so that the associative Merchandise made billions up until Disney bought the IP!
    Star Wars Merchandise Died since Disney!
    Try again, Mike!

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >be a millionare israelite with YT ceo in your backpocket
      >get BTFO by a humble bean salesman

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Jeremy Rules! And thats Sir Jeremy to you!

        ((Journalists and writers)) seem to like it, but that may be just them selling out to the mouse for continued access and paychecks.

        [...]
        You're right, I'm not. And you're clearly butthurt but have no argument or else you would address what I'm actually saying instead of resorting to buzzwords. Cope and seethe.

        Disney owes the investors nearly 20 billion on Star Wars. It was 4 billion in 2012, so its probably 4* that number today.

  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The only reason ((people)) like the shitquels now is because Disney's propaganda campaign is in full swing, pushing so hard for everyone to like them and insulting anyone who doesn't. Without that constant aura of artifical hype, people will start to recognize them as bread and circuses aimed at the lowest common denominator audiences who don't ask anything of their media. So no, in 20 years I say the opposite will happen. People will come around on the sequels, but in reverse from the prequels.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      No one likes it rhough. Fans of George bought his merchandise! Billions of dollars of merchandise bought! Disney merchandise bombs!

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        ((Journalists and writers)) seem to like it, but that may be just them selling out to the mouse for continued access and paychecks.

        >shitquels
        You are not a woman

        You're right, I'm not. And you're clearly butthurt but have no argument or else you would address what I'm actually saying instead of resorting to buzzwords. Cope and seethe.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >shitquels
      You are not a woman

  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >retroactively start liking the sequel trilogy
    That isn't the correct use of the word. The correct use would be that they retroactively describe the prequels as always being well liked and respected, despite this only being a recent phenomenon.

  17. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Yes. Prequel revisionism was pushed and funded by Disney corporate so they can just do it again.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Correct.

  18. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    no as they are literally just reboots of each film of the OT. they have terrible characters generic plots. only thing that coild be enjoyed is Rogue One.

    unless disney makes another trilogy thats somehow worse than 7-9 which is impossible to do. i dont think anything can be worse than8-9

  19. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    > t. people in this thread trying their hardest not to admit OP's point will happen

    star wars surely the most deluded of fanbases

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      It won't, only because """people""" already think disneywars is "good".
      There's nothing to turn around on.
      Whereas the small minority of people who still have an objective grasp on reality know the OT is the only worthwhile Star Wars. Period.

  20. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I doubt it, the prequels felt like a george lucas product, the sequels feel like it was engineered by a board of marketing executives

  21. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >dislike the force awakens because it's ANH again
    "at least it's not the prequels"
    >dislike the last jedi because it became abundantly clear disney had no plan for the trilogy
    "you just hate it because you hate strong women"
    >dislike the rise of skywalker because it's a hotter fricking mess than attack of the clones was
    >normies hate it too
    star wars fans are fricking weird

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Disney's dying. The prequels associative merchandise made billions. There's videos of businesses shredding dumping and crushing Disney's nu wars merchandise!

      The force awakens toys Bankrupted Toys R US!

      Disney's nu wars is dead!

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        not a disney gay but don't kids just not play with toys anyways? i thought they were obsessed with ipads

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Every other IP toys makes billions except for Star Wars. Look at Light Year! They're killing profits for the message and diversity! They're hoping Larry Fink bails them out.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Light year, Toys Story IP, is dead!

  22. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    the sequel trilogy to me is just working in Solo, Rogue One, and Last Jedi, it's fun for all that to tie together and for shit to have hit the fan after Return of the Jedi, a literal who shows up at the behest of Leia to say Luke is needed, but he is in the final throws of his jedidom, and blah blah words - he shows up and that entire sequence where a lone jedi heads off a fricking army using his force power, that's the end of Star Wars for me, the panning out over the galaxy talking up heroes coming to face off against villains and the inevitable rise of evil and imbalance of the force; THAT'S FRICKING STAR WARS.

  23. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    probably because zoomers dont know any better and are allergic to quality

  24. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    No, they are already largly forgotten. In 20 years we will just forget about them gor good

  25. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >OT - Lucas
    >PT - Lucas
    >ST- no Lucas
    >random shitposters on Cinemaphile: THEY'RE EXACTLY THE SAME HAHA
    To think the ST and PT are equivalent requires you to draw an arbitrary line between the OT and PT that doesn't exist

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      ST and PT both being bad doesn't mean they're equal
      the OT isn't even as good as star wars gays go on about

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >the OT isn't even as good as star wars gays go on about
        Unironically this
        >t. Old time fan

  26. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Nobody is even going to remember the sequels to begin with, hell people have already forgotten about them except for Cinemaphile.

  27. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >liking the sequel trilogy
    >Han's, Leia's and Luke's actors still alive
    >no reunion scene, they don't even give a frick about each other, exactly ONE scene with Han and Leia where they just talk like mopey weirdos who got divorced 20 years ago and are still seething about the thing
    >end of TRoS retroactively makes 8 movies irrelevant
    Absolutely, utterly impossible.

  28. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I tried really hard, for a time to get into the lore of the new canon and the ST, but to me it just doesn't really work. I liked some stuff, especially some of the books and most of them focus PT/OT characters or scenarios, there hardly is any relevant media for the ST.

    If I watched the ST and liked the characters and plotlines within there is very little to get attached to past the point of the actual movies, so I feel like kids who grew up in the 2010s and became SW fans will just gravitate to what the related media focuses on and that's PT/OT.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      This. They fricked up so hard by not creating an interesting universe for the ST to inhabit. The political state of the galaxy is nonsensical, no fricking Jedi to speak of, Han and Leia hate each other, Luke's in exile... Say what you want about the prequels but the world and lore are so naturally fascinating, conducive to tie-in stories, comics, merchandise, etc. You WANT to jump in and learn every random detail. With the sequels you just don't care because Disney doesn't care.

  29. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    No.

    The prequels were really stupid in some places but also had a lot of memorable scenes and characters.
    The sequels were mostly forgettable except for some really stupid stuff.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The prequels literally did not have a single character

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >The prequels literally did not have a single character
        what did he mean by this?

  30. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    TLJ is the only one that has any potential to experience some sort of retroactive appreciation
    the others are too soulless for that

  31. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I can’t think of a single quote or scene from the trilogy that could be used out of context in a humorous way. If it doesn’t even have that then I doubt it will age the same way the prequel trilogy has.

  32. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    There's nothing 'retroactive' about it lol. All that's happening is opinions are settling to a point that actualy reflects the quality of the movie in question

    You see it all the time when something is massively overhyped at release, people say it's the greatest thing ever made, then eventually consensus settles on something more reasonable.
    The reverse is also true. The vitriol towards the Prequels at release is in no way proportionate to the quality of the movies, so of course eventually less emotional and rabid people will re-evaluate them in a more positive way.

    With the sequels, the only one even comparable is The Last Jedi, and that's the only one I can see getting any kind of critical re-examination (also because, much like the prequels, a lot of the story and themes in TLJ have been completely distorted by internet discussion to make the movie seem worse). The Force Awakens already went through the 'overhyped to lukewarm' reception, and nobody cares enough about 9 to really have an opinion either way.

  33. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    A lot of people actually liked the prequels, especially ROTS even back then. I know I lost my shit in the theater back in 2005.

  34. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    TFA and TLJ were both successfully critically and financially, they both also have good user scores too, only TRoS has a mixed reception. 20 years from now idiots like you will say no one liked those movies when clearly a lot of people did, just like you are doing today

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      i went into a theater with a bunch of people excited to see TLJ (i hated TFA and joined them to hatewatch it) and every single one despised the last jedi. Rian Johnson having his own trilogy cut tells you everything you need to know.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Well shit I thought a bunch of people liked TFA and TLJ and that there was plenty of evidence in that from reviews and forum posts online, but I guess you and a bunch of your friends didn't like it then they must be lying.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      TLJ killed Star Wars. My friends and I all stopped going to Star Wars movies because of it.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >anecdotal shit oblivious to the facts
        Rise of Skywalker still clocked in the obligatory billion dollars, and they're still pumping out shows and side projects. TLJ is polarizing at best, but like it or not everyone still pays attention to it. Even the youtubers who utterly detest Didsneeyd can't stop talking about it. You want to see a movie that actually killed a franchise? Transformers 4.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Merchandise is dead in the water. Disney has bought tickets in the pass so a billion dollars box office means nothing!

          Merchandise is fan approval of which the prequels did Billions!
          Disney nu wars is dead!

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >b-but the le toys!
            Kids don't buy toys as a whole anymore, moron. It's all about iphones, fortnite and youtuber shirts now. When was the last time you walked in a Target or Walmart? It's not just Star wars stuff still sitting on shelves. Hell, the fact that Toys R Us doesn't even exist anymore should tell you how general the problem really is.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Disney killed Toys R Us! Disney literally Said, All your products has to be The Force Awakwns!

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >TFA makes 2 billion
          >TLJ makes 1.4 billion
          >ROS barely clocks in a billion
          You lost 50% of the audience lmao. They stopped making Star Wars movies and turned to cheap tv shows for a reason.

          Fricking Aquaman made more money than the conclusion of the sequel trilogy, Jesus Christ. And remember, Disney paid 4 BILLION for this franchise.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            TFA, were it about Ewoks and Robots, would have made 2 billion.

            TFA as it was killed the Merchandise.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Most people were fooled by TFA's nostalgia pandering and member berries. There was huge hype going into TLJ. All they had to was have Luke kick ass with his green lightsaber and train Rey, and it would have made 2+ billion easily, but Rian fricked it all up.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >TFA and TLJ were both successfully critically and financially
      i don't care about israelitemoney or the opinions or hacks

  35. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    No. And I liked the prequels from when they first came out and always will.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Prequels merchandise made billions. So you were in good company.

  36. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    20 years? Probably less!

    Reminder that The Force Awakens will be 10 in 3 years.

  37. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    kids loved the prequels when they came out, nobody loved the sequels except monetized youtube critics that needed to protect their association with Disney

  38. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    it doesn't have "memes" so no

  39. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Cartoons and games saved the prequel trilogy and its setting. No one is using the sequel trilogy for anything because it is too much of a wreck. Everything coming out now takes place before the OT.

  40. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The prequels were always good.
    The sequels never were and never will be good.

  41. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    yes, because it’ll be gold compared to the inevitably of sheboons twerking onscreen for 90 minutes straight
    >WET ASS PUSSY
    >WET ASS PUSSY
    >fo dat
    >WET ASS PUSSY

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      We already have this, though,

  42. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Padme he was 17 years, 364 days, 23 hours and 3500 seconds old you sick frick

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Padme was 5 years older than Anakin.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I learned recently that Han/Leia and Kylo/Rey both have a larger age gap than Padme/Anakin
      Kinda weird that only one gets talked about

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        That's becouse Padme meet Anakin when he was a child

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        That's because those characters meet while adults and don't feature hilarious dialogue like "Goodness you've grown!" that call attention to it.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          And yet the Prequels merchandise Made Billions! Can Disney say the same?

  43. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Prequels
    >great original stories and aesthetic
    >memorable quotes and characters
    >technological achievements
    >Made by George Lucas, so Canon
    Sequels
    >drab aesthetic and OT ripoffs
    >literally nothing memorable or memeable
    >corporate garbage, so fan-fiction

    Not an even comparison whatsoever. Everyone knows this. What’s more interesting are the motives of the homosexuals pushing this idea of ‘muh in 100years you’ll see...’ There’s a clear desire to bring down the prequels. After all, prequel-hate is why the sequels exist and only ripoff the OT, and why the sequels were tailored for the OT fanboy. The PT haters STILL can’t accept that people like these movies. This recent idea of equating the two is just their most recent attempt to relive their butthurt for the PT.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >prequel-hate is why the sequels exist and only ripoff the OT,
      This is somewhat true, but I don't think you can blame people that dislike the prequels. To me it just meant they failed to internalize why the prequels are turds and why the OT is good. The sequels are what they are because they were made by people with a facile understanding of Star Wars.

  44. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I always liked the prequels. I dont like the Disney.

  45. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Gen X’s will but kids won’t since they don’t care about Star Wars

  46. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    No but no one will still care about the prequels either
    little children will like something which disturbs and horrifies anyone that has already been born in 2022

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Prequels made its billions in merchandise! Of which Disney can never say!

  47. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    No, and this video does a good job of explaining why.

    The sequels don't stand alone and achieve anything as their own movies, each one is an anti-movie that exists only to undo and cancel out previous Star Wars movie/s.
    >Force Awakens is anti-prequel
    >Last Jedi is anti-Force Awakens
    >Rise of Skywalker is anti-Last Jedi

    The prequels have a lot of flaws but at least they are unique and try to expand the universe without shitting on any previous Star Wars material

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *