In the last year we have gotten
>AI art
>AI animation
>AI Dialog
>AI voice acting
How will this effect indie and internet animations?
Will Korean sweat shops no longer be required in the future for big time studies either?
In the last year we have gotten. >AI art. >AI animation. >AI Dialog. >AI voice acting
This phonograph "reads" a rock’s rough surface and transforms it into beautiful ambient music pic.twitter.com/PYDzYsWWf8
— Surreal Videos (@SurrealVideos) March 3, 2023
>All the twitter tards trying to argue AI art is illegal because web scraping!
>In the last year we have gotten
>>AI art
>>AI animation
>>AI Dialog
>>AI voice acting
>How will this effect indie and internet animations?
>Will Korean sweat shops no longer be required in the future for big time studies either?
>>All the twitter tards trying to argue AI art is illegal because web scraping!
Use an AI generated image next time
Twitter tards a year ago
>WHO CARES ABOUT COPYRIGHT COPYRIGHT IS EVIL HERE IS MY STEVEN UNIVERSE PORN I AM SELLING FOR MONEY
Twitter tards now
>NOOOOOOOOOO AI CAN'T JUST LOOK AT MY PUBLICALLY AVAILABLE ART WORK
>Twitter tards a year ago
>>WHO CARES ABOUT COPYRIGHT COPYRIGHT IS EVIL HERE IS MY STEVEN UNIVERSE PORN I AM SELLING FOR MONEY
>Twitter tards now
AI CAN'T JUST LOOK AT MY PUBLICALLY AVAILABLE ART WORK
>Use an AI generated image next time
Actually reading, this seems to be outside the context of that case. Twitterfags seem to be right on this one. AI"art" i s just thievery if you don't have the artist's consent.
>movie studios and news stations constantly steal entire pieces of artwork and videos from independent artists and youtubers
>now it's bad though because anyone could steal 1/1000 of an image by generating their own
What does web scraping have to do with using stolen art? You still can't have copyright over stolen art
You cant scrape ip like people's art
Websites are ip
Cartoons are dead.
>Cartoons are dead.
Considering you need to know what you are doing with any of these programs to get the same results as hiring somene, the only people who seem to be getting anything out of it are those selling the programs to people who believe AI is the future.
Netflix made an anime short using AI
>Netflix
>they used an ai
>a human that's not even credited had to draw every background twice
I think AI art is fine as long as it will only be used to solve like the small annoying shit in art and animation. Like same way the transition to digital helped solve the annoyances of traditional. The problem how ever if when fags with zero skill are trying to claim their real artist with their ai generated images that steal from other peoples work.
Indies and professional animation companies can't use ai anyway without ai giving a list of artists to credit and pay for royalties. It's cheaper to hire animators than paying thousands of artists to use their art for ai consumption. Plus there's no profits for stuff you can't even copyright
And yet we still don't have robots to cook and clean.
It's because pajeets don't know what that is, they just want to destroy creation and culture.
ai art uses the same technology as those filters like faceapp have used retard and that shits been around for a long while